This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 9 |
|
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:21, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
I disagree with the tagging of the YouTube video as an unreliable source, as the information comes from the official Hollyoaks YouTube account, and whilst it may not be the most formal, it still gives relevant information that has been backed up from other sources, such as Digital Spy. Yoshi876 ( talk) 00:12, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
I don't understand this what you're saying. All main cast, including children, have had infoboxes across most soaps. Is there any rule or agreement you can show to prove this?
Thanks,
Grangehilllover ( talk) 18:52, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:20, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
{{
wayback}}
in
Clare BatesWhy did you add a non-functioning template to this article? diff. -- Green C 16:34, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi again, Soaper1234. As you may have seen already, an editor has expressed willingness to review the Casualty (series 30) article against the Good Article criteria. Just thought I'd inform you in case you were unaware. ElectrodeandtheAnode ( talk) 22:22, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
Just so you know, I really don't mind you adding to the pages I'm working on, because I sometimes get a bit jammed with words and stuff and when others help, I can learn from it. Thank you for what you are doing.
Grangehilllover ( talk) 20:22, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Lofty Chiltern at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! - Vivvt ( Talk) 06:45, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your thanks! It's something I'm doing very sporadically and inefficiently when I've got a spare moment but I'm glad it's appreciated. Skteosk ( talk) 08:08, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
I finished going through all the Episode Summaries and gave the adjustments that I think need to be made. As soon as the Summaries are adjusted I will consider WP:GA Criteria 1A(Prose) to be fulfilled and I think I will probably be able to finish up my GA Review shortly. Shearonink ( talk) 03:52, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Congratulations, it's a... | |
... Wikipedia Good Article!! Shearonink ( talk) 16:38, 29 March 2017 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of awards and nominations received by Holby City, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Metro (newspaper) and David Ames. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:00, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of EastEnders characters (2000), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matthew Robinson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:48, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
That's what happens when you edit late at night. Thank you for correcting it. - JuneGloom07 Talk 19:37, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Thought I'd come over to your talk page to ask this: I don't suppose you have anything in any of the soap magazines about the recent "Reap the Whirlwind" pair of episodes which can be added to a reception section do you? No worries if you do not, just thought it would be worth an ask. Many thanks in advance. ElectrodeandtheAnode ( talk) 21:05, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
The article Too Old for This Shift you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Too Old for This Shift for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 ( talk) 02:41, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for participating in the DYK process. Please be aware that if you review an article, you cannot promote it to prep. I returned the hook to the nominations area for another editor to promote.
As a side note, when you do promote a hook to prep, you also need to add the credit line to the prep page (near the bottom) so the page creator will get credit for it. Yoninah ( talk) 22:13, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
On 1 June 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lofty Chiltern, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the role of Lofty Chiltern in Casualty was specifically written for actor Lee Mead? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lofty Chiltern. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Lofty Chiltern), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:33, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
On 6 June 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Babe Smith, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the billed personality of EastEnders character Babe Smith was swapped with that of Stan Carter? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Babe Smith. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Babe Smith), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter ( talk) 00:03, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi again! Just thought I would let you know that I have virtually finished the rewrite of the Casualty (series 29) article. I have expanded on the lead, finished the production and reception section and written all the summaries. I have also checked the reference section and it seems fine to me. Not sure if you want to have a final look over the article, and if you think it is good to go, then the Casualty (series 29) article can be overwritten with the updated, rewritten article. ElectrodeandtheAnode ( talk) 14:32, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Babe Smith you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sagecandor -- Sagecandor ( talk) 21:21, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
The article Babe Smith you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Babe Smith for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sagecandor -- Sagecandor ( talk) 21:02, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
On 22 June 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Too Old for This Shift, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Casualty producers worked with the Association of Air Ambulances for over half a year on the special episode " Too Old for This Shift"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Too Old for This Shift. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Too Old for This Shift), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
IronGargoyle ( talk) 01:54, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
I do mind somewhat. It might seem silly, but I really dislike it when people edit my userspace without at least dropping me a note first, as it completely throws me off. Personally, I don't think there was a need to add the archive link right that minute, as it wasn't going anywhere (once it's archived, it's archived). But nevermind, at least you weren't that IP sock causing disruption. :) - JuneGloom07 Talk 16:22, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
On 16 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Casualty (series 29), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the BBC medical drama series Casualty received criticism for a series 29 episode which featured a crash that viewers believed resembled the 2014 Glasgow bin lorry crash? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Casualty (series 29). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Casualty (series 29)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
IronGargoyle ( talk) 00:03, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello again, Soaper1234. I was actually planning to come and write on your talk page sometime in the near future wondering if you would be interested in creating an article for the episode "One" with me − however it looks like you beat me to it! I just wanted to say your user article for "One" looks incredible so far, some brilliant progress on that article, so well done. Keep it up!
On another note, I would really like it if we could get the Main Characters section sorted for Holby City articles; in my honest opinion it looks a mess. I am aware that other editors have looked at this in the past, but overall there was no action made to improve the Main Characters section. I have an idea of what to do to try and neaten up the main character section, but I thought I would come to you first and see if you had any suggestions. ElectrodeandtheAnode ( talk) 08:56, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi User:Soaper1234, can you add an entry for the character Rich (a source here [1]) on List of Coronation Street characters (2017) please? Because it's a character crucial to a stryline and doesn't have an entry on article.-- Theo Mandela ( talk) 04:13, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Just seen the new set up been done for Casualty cast, in my opinion it should be change back to what it was. Just the character and actor is bland and boring, the job role and hierarchy of characters was much more organised and effiecient. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.3.62.159 ( talk) 22:15, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi again Soaper1234, it's me... once again!
I was wondering if, when you get a few minutes, you could possibly have a read-through and, where necessary, copyedit, the rewrite of the HolbyBlue article I have created in my sandbox? If you do read through it and think it is okay, then I will go ahead and overwrite the original article with my rewrite, before putting it up for a GAN. Don't worry if you do not have the time at the moment, I can always ask another editor if necessary. (P.S. Loving the "One" article you are working on, it is honestly looking fantastic.) All the best, ElectrodeandtheAnode ( talk) 23:11, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Do you think you would make a page for Harry now he has been revealed as Amy's killer?
Hey!
I've noticed and rectifying your doings on Holby series 1-19 wiki pages, Could you please respect the way the cast format is like and not change them to your own way / change them back to the way they were? I'm changing the Holby ones back myself, but could you do me a favour and change the Casualty ones back? Thanks in Advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.253.210.31 ( talk) 15:51, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi again, this guy - ElectrodeandtheAnode, told me to respond to you instead of doing an edit war (which for ElectrodeandtheAnode's knowledge improvment, I only did like 2 edits before my previous message to Soaper, after which I stopped) so here I am to talk. I really did not want to respond at first because it really is useless because it won't change anything so I'll be brief: I don't like the new format, in fact, hate it but won't do anything against it since last time I changed someone's edit on a wiki page (in fact I made a sentence correct) I got a death threat so I don't need any butthurt editors trying to kill me (not saying you're butthurt btw). I hope one day the format will be changed back to the better one as now my work on Holby series 1-8 has been practically undone and it feels bad. Thank you for your time.
On 24 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kirsty Clements, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in order to accurately portray her character Kirsty Clements' domestic violence storyline, actress Lucy Gaskell spoke to women affected by domestic abuse? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kirsty Clements. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Kirsty Clements), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Sam Nicholls.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:50, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi again, Soaper1234! I just want to apologise now for taking so long to create this, but I finally have written a summary for your article, "One". I will get it added to your article by this evening. I might make a few tweaks after I have added it as I am not completely satisfied with the plot, and it is also just slightly (about 20 words) over 400 words, however after working on it and making many changes to the plot over the past month and a bit, I think it is appropriate now to be added. I am surprised myself in how difficult it was to write an extended summary for this episode! Hope you are doing well! ElectrodeandtheAnode ( talk) 13:19, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Hey. Thank you for correcting the category and episode title errors in the episode article. I had to admit defeat this morning and put it in the main space. When I started it I expected lots of episode reviews and magazine sources. It was not to be though, it is kind of lacklustre as a result.. Rain the 1 23:30, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi again, Soaper1234. So I reviewed the current List of Casualty episodes article tonight, and it came to my attention that the Specials section of the article is, quite literally, a mess. I have began creating a new version of the Special episodes table, and aim to get it overwritten on the current Specials episode table by the middle of next week. However, I have come across a "special" that I quite frankly am left querying myself about. The "Blue Peter Special" "episode" is the one I am talking about (Special 5) − I am struggling to find any source which even recognises this Casualty snippet, as I would personally refer it to, as being a notable event. What is your opinion on this "special episode"? Hope you are keeping well. ElectrodeandtheAnode ( talk) 23:03, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi again Soaper1234. I was wondering if it might be worth starting to consider moving User:ElectrodeandtheAnode/List of Casualty characters over to the current main article? If we update the user article first, do you think it would be ready to be moved over? ElectrodeandtheAnode ( talk) 18:47, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I really appreciate the update you did in the lead to User:AnemoneProjectors/List of EastEnders episodes (2017). The monthly sections still need paragraphs added with their notable storylines, arrivals and departures, and I think the best thing to do is to source the notable storylines first (especially those that were announced or trailed, had a big impact or continued across multiple weeks) and then use that to update the lead section with the year's notable storylines. It's a job I fell behind, as well as updating the cast section with the cast changes. Would you be willing to help out on those bits? — anemone projectors 09:02, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font>
tags, which are causing
Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.
You are encouraged to change
[[User:Soaper1234|<font color="#FF7400">'''Soaper1234'''</font>]] - <small>[[User talk:Soaper1234|<font color="#00A6FF">talk</font>]]</small>
:
Soaper1234 -
talkto
[[User:Soaper1234|<b style="color: #FF7400;">Soaper1234</b>]] - <small>[[User talk:Soaper1234|<span style="color: #00A6FF;">talk</span>]]</small>
:
Soaper1234 -
talkRespectfully, Anomalocaris ( talk) 22:08, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Soaper1234. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Merry Christmas Soaper1234!!
Hi Soaper1234, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year,
Thanks for all your help and contributions on the 'pedia!
,
–
Davey2010
Merry Xmas / Happy New Year
15:13, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Belated Merry Christmas back at you and Happy New Year! Skteosk ( talk) 08:54, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 9 |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 9 |
|
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:21, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
I disagree with the tagging of the YouTube video as an unreliable source, as the information comes from the official Hollyoaks YouTube account, and whilst it may not be the most formal, it still gives relevant information that has been backed up from other sources, such as Digital Spy. Yoshi876 ( talk) 00:12, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
I don't understand this what you're saying. All main cast, including children, have had infoboxes across most soaps. Is there any rule or agreement you can show to prove this?
Thanks,
Grangehilllover ( talk) 18:52, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:20, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
{{
wayback}}
in
Clare BatesWhy did you add a non-functioning template to this article? diff. -- Green C 16:34, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi again, Soaper1234. As you may have seen already, an editor has expressed willingness to review the Casualty (series 30) article against the Good Article criteria. Just thought I'd inform you in case you were unaware. ElectrodeandtheAnode ( talk) 22:22, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
Just so you know, I really don't mind you adding to the pages I'm working on, because I sometimes get a bit jammed with words and stuff and when others help, I can learn from it. Thank you for what you are doing.
Grangehilllover ( talk) 20:22, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Lofty Chiltern at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! - Vivvt ( Talk) 06:45, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your thanks! It's something I'm doing very sporadically and inefficiently when I've got a spare moment but I'm glad it's appreciated. Skteosk ( talk) 08:08, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
I finished going through all the Episode Summaries and gave the adjustments that I think need to be made. As soon as the Summaries are adjusted I will consider WP:GA Criteria 1A(Prose) to be fulfilled and I think I will probably be able to finish up my GA Review shortly. Shearonink ( talk) 03:52, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Congratulations, it's a... | |
... Wikipedia Good Article!! Shearonink ( talk) 16:38, 29 March 2017 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of awards and nominations received by Holby City, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Metro (newspaper) and David Ames. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:00, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of EastEnders characters (2000), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matthew Robinson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:48, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
That's what happens when you edit late at night. Thank you for correcting it. - JuneGloom07 Talk 19:37, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Thought I'd come over to your talk page to ask this: I don't suppose you have anything in any of the soap magazines about the recent "Reap the Whirlwind" pair of episodes which can be added to a reception section do you? No worries if you do not, just thought it would be worth an ask. Many thanks in advance. ElectrodeandtheAnode ( talk) 21:05, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
The article Too Old for This Shift you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Too Old for This Shift for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 ( talk) 02:41, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for participating in the DYK process. Please be aware that if you review an article, you cannot promote it to prep. I returned the hook to the nominations area for another editor to promote.
As a side note, when you do promote a hook to prep, you also need to add the credit line to the prep page (near the bottom) so the page creator will get credit for it. Yoninah ( talk) 22:13, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
On 1 June 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lofty Chiltern, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the role of Lofty Chiltern in Casualty was specifically written for actor Lee Mead? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lofty Chiltern. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Lofty Chiltern), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:33, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
On 6 June 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Babe Smith, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the billed personality of EastEnders character Babe Smith was swapped with that of Stan Carter? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Babe Smith. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Babe Smith), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter ( talk) 00:03, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi again! Just thought I would let you know that I have virtually finished the rewrite of the Casualty (series 29) article. I have expanded on the lead, finished the production and reception section and written all the summaries. I have also checked the reference section and it seems fine to me. Not sure if you want to have a final look over the article, and if you think it is good to go, then the Casualty (series 29) article can be overwritten with the updated, rewritten article. ElectrodeandtheAnode ( talk) 14:32, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Babe Smith you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sagecandor -- Sagecandor ( talk) 21:21, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
The article Babe Smith you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Babe Smith for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sagecandor -- Sagecandor ( talk) 21:02, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
On 22 June 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Too Old for This Shift, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Casualty producers worked with the Association of Air Ambulances for over half a year on the special episode " Too Old for This Shift"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Too Old for This Shift. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Too Old for This Shift), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
IronGargoyle ( talk) 01:54, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
I do mind somewhat. It might seem silly, but I really dislike it when people edit my userspace without at least dropping me a note first, as it completely throws me off. Personally, I don't think there was a need to add the archive link right that minute, as it wasn't going anywhere (once it's archived, it's archived). But nevermind, at least you weren't that IP sock causing disruption. :) - JuneGloom07 Talk 16:22, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
On 16 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Casualty (series 29), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the BBC medical drama series Casualty received criticism for a series 29 episode which featured a crash that viewers believed resembled the 2014 Glasgow bin lorry crash? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Casualty (series 29). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Casualty (series 29)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
IronGargoyle ( talk) 00:03, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello again, Soaper1234. I was actually planning to come and write on your talk page sometime in the near future wondering if you would be interested in creating an article for the episode "One" with me − however it looks like you beat me to it! I just wanted to say your user article for "One" looks incredible so far, some brilliant progress on that article, so well done. Keep it up!
On another note, I would really like it if we could get the Main Characters section sorted for Holby City articles; in my honest opinion it looks a mess. I am aware that other editors have looked at this in the past, but overall there was no action made to improve the Main Characters section. I have an idea of what to do to try and neaten up the main character section, but I thought I would come to you first and see if you had any suggestions. ElectrodeandtheAnode ( talk) 08:56, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi User:Soaper1234, can you add an entry for the character Rich (a source here [1]) on List of Coronation Street characters (2017) please? Because it's a character crucial to a stryline and doesn't have an entry on article.-- Theo Mandela ( talk) 04:13, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Just seen the new set up been done for Casualty cast, in my opinion it should be change back to what it was. Just the character and actor is bland and boring, the job role and hierarchy of characters was much more organised and effiecient. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.3.62.159 ( talk) 22:15, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi again Soaper1234, it's me... once again!
I was wondering if, when you get a few minutes, you could possibly have a read-through and, where necessary, copyedit, the rewrite of the HolbyBlue article I have created in my sandbox? If you do read through it and think it is okay, then I will go ahead and overwrite the original article with my rewrite, before putting it up for a GAN. Don't worry if you do not have the time at the moment, I can always ask another editor if necessary. (P.S. Loving the "One" article you are working on, it is honestly looking fantastic.) All the best, ElectrodeandtheAnode ( talk) 23:11, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Do you think you would make a page for Harry now he has been revealed as Amy's killer?
Hey!
I've noticed and rectifying your doings on Holby series 1-19 wiki pages, Could you please respect the way the cast format is like and not change them to your own way / change them back to the way they were? I'm changing the Holby ones back myself, but could you do me a favour and change the Casualty ones back? Thanks in Advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.253.210.31 ( talk) 15:51, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi again, this guy - ElectrodeandtheAnode, told me to respond to you instead of doing an edit war (which for ElectrodeandtheAnode's knowledge improvment, I only did like 2 edits before my previous message to Soaper, after which I stopped) so here I am to talk. I really did not want to respond at first because it really is useless because it won't change anything so I'll be brief: I don't like the new format, in fact, hate it but won't do anything against it since last time I changed someone's edit on a wiki page (in fact I made a sentence correct) I got a death threat so I don't need any butthurt editors trying to kill me (not saying you're butthurt btw). I hope one day the format will be changed back to the better one as now my work on Holby series 1-8 has been practically undone and it feels bad. Thank you for your time.
On 24 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kirsty Clements, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in order to accurately portray her character Kirsty Clements' domestic violence storyline, actress Lucy Gaskell spoke to women affected by domestic abuse? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kirsty Clements. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Kirsty Clements), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Sam Nicholls.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:50, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi again, Soaper1234! I just want to apologise now for taking so long to create this, but I finally have written a summary for your article, "One". I will get it added to your article by this evening. I might make a few tweaks after I have added it as I am not completely satisfied with the plot, and it is also just slightly (about 20 words) over 400 words, however after working on it and making many changes to the plot over the past month and a bit, I think it is appropriate now to be added. I am surprised myself in how difficult it was to write an extended summary for this episode! Hope you are doing well! ElectrodeandtheAnode ( talk) 13:19, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Hey. Thank you for correcting the category and episode title errors in the episode article. I had to admit defeat this morning and put it in the main space. When I started it I expected lots of episode reviews and magazine sources. It was not to be though, it is kind of lacklustre as a result.. Rain the 1 23:30, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi again, Soaper1234. So I reviewed the current List of Casualty episodes article tonight, and it came to my attention that the Specials section of the article is, quite literally, a mess. I have began creating a new version of the Special episodes table, and aim to get it overwritten on the current Specials episode table by the middle of next week. However, I have come across a "special" that I quite frankly am left querying myself about. The "Blue Peter Special" "episode" is the one I am talking about (Special 5) − I am struggling to find any source which even recognises this Casualty snippet, as I would personally refer it to, as being a notable event. What is your opinion on this "special episode"? Hope you are keeping well. ElectrodeandtheAnode ( talk) 23:03, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi again Soaper1234. I was wondering if it might be worth starting to consider moving User:ElectrodeandtheAnode/List of Casualty characters over to the current main article? If we update the user article first, do you think it would be ready to be moved over? ElectrodeandtheAnode ( talk) 18:47, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I really appreciate the update you did in the lead to User:AnemoneProjectors/List of EastEnders episodes (2017). The monthly sections still need paragraphs added with their notable storylines, arrivals and departures, and I think the best thing to do is to source the notable storylines first (especially those that were announced or trailed, had a big impact or continued across multiple weeks) and then use that to update the lead section with the year's notable storylines. It's a job I fell behind, as well as updating the cast section with the cast changes. Would you be willing to help out on those bits? — anemone projectors 09:02, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font>
tags, which are causing
Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.
You are encouraged to change
[[User:Soaper1234|<font color="#FF7400">'''Soaper1234'''</font>]] - <small>[[User talk:Soaper1234|<font color="#00A6FF">talk</font>]]</small>
:
Soaper1234 -
talkto
[[User:Soaper1234|<b style="color: #FF7400;">Soaper1234</b>]] - <small>[[User talk:Soaper1234|<span style="color: #00A6FF;">talk</span>]]</small>
:
Soaper1234 -
talkRespectfully, Anomalocaris ( talk) 22:08, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Soaper1234. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Merry Christmas Soaper1234!!
Hi Soaper1234, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year,
Thanks for all your help and contributions on the 'pedia!
,
–
Davey2010
Merry Xmas / Happy New Year
15:13, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Belated Merry Christmas back at you and Happy New Year! Skteosk ( talk) 08:54, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 9 |