Hi Slimshady75! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 13 October 2018 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Sanam Re, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jim1138 ( talk) 07:31, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
The exact same thing has been written twice that's why I removed it Slimshady75 ( talk) 07:33, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello. In New Zealand English we write numbers greater than 999 with commas as separators - so 5342 is written as 5,432; 10654231 is written as 10,654,231. This improves readability and maintains the style users will expect to see on an article associated with that country. The style of English expected in an article is often specified as a note within the wiki code at the top of the page. In the case of New Zealand English you can find this laid out in the New Zealand governments own style guides here and here for example. On wikipedia there is a section at WP:DIGITS that also makes this clear.
Please stop changing number formats away from those in general use in the country the article is associated with. It is disruptive. The same style is used for numbers greater than 999 in Australia, the UK and South Africa as well.
You should also know that we use long dashes to separate years rather than the minus sign on your keyboard - so, we would use 2000–2005 not 2000-2005.
In the infoboxes for cricketers, please don't add in last match played when it's not already in the article (the problem if articles not being updated frequently means that this actually creates significant reliability issues) and don't change dates for infobox stats unless you're actually updating the statistics - and certainly don't chnange them to a previous date. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 16:27, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Well I didn't know that so I won't change it but you can check the profile of any cricketer everywhere it is mentioned that when and against whom he played his last odi/T20/test match so why do you remove that?? Slimshady75 ( talk) 16:51, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
And second thing is that I change the statistics/dates whenever the player plays any match Slimshady75 ( talk) 16:55, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
I will not let that happen (incorrect dates) and I will make sure that I update the date and stats whenever Adam Milne plays any international/domestic match so kindly allow me to write the dates of his last odi and T20I in his Wikipedia profile Slimshady75 ( talk) 20:36, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Trent Boult, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please read the template documentation at Template:Infobox cricketer, in particular the note about using endash in the Club section and the note in the Stats section about which types of matches we usually include. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 12:59, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
You can check the player profile of any cricketer everywhere his T20I stats are mentioned kindly don't change them and add his List A stats as T20 is the most popular form in cricket and most people don't even know the full form of LA, second thing is that Trent Boult has been retained by Delhi Daredevils team for the upcoming Ipl so he is currently contracted to that team. Slimshady75 ( talk) 14:16, 2 December 2018 (UTC):
The dash issue is a very small thing but you need to realise that it is important to show the stats of a player in an international format (T20) and not his domestic stats and second Thing I am telling you again Trent Boult has been retained by Delhi Daredevils team for the upcoming Ipl so he is currently contracted to that team plz allow me to write his international T20I stats Slimshady75 ( talk) 14:38, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
The year is about to end very soon Slimshady75 ( talk) 14:55, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Travis Head, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bowler ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:27, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 18:36, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please see MOS:DATERANGE, read it and follow it. This is part of the MOS - it is not negotiable. To revert edits without using an edit summary and break the MOS at the same time is essentially vandalism. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 16:36, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Blue Square Thing ( talk) 16:40, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Andrew Tye. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. The manual of style is not optional. See MOS:DATERANGE. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 06:19, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. MOS:DATEFORMAT is very clear about the non-use of spaces between dates when they are used in the way they are in the infobox. Given your unwillingness to engage in discussion about this issue, your inability to follow the Manual of Style and your use of blank edit summaries, this is beginning to look like deliberate vandalism now. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 16:30, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Look Andrew Tye, Ish Sodhi, Trent Boult Colin Munro have all been retained by their Ipl teams which means they are contracted to those teams that is why I edit their profile and write the word present with the year so why you remove that?? Second thing in Martin Guptill's profile Derbyshire is already mentioned once you can add the year next to that why is the need to write Derbyshire while it is already mentioned Slimshady75 ( talk) 17:22, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Blue Square Thing. Your recent edit to the page Harry Gurney appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The infobox is used for teams the player has played for, not ones that they might do so in the future. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 19:00, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Harry Gurney was picked up by Kolkata Knight Riders in the Ipl auction and he was also signed by Quetta Gladiators in the Psl draft which means he will play for both of those teams this year so how do you think that this information is incorrect? Slimshady75 ( talk) 20:07, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Whether he plays or not is something which cannot be said right now but since he has signed with those teams so it required to mention about those teams in his profile if he doesn't play then that information can be removed later Slimshady75 ( talk) 20:19, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Andrew Tye. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. You are also quite deliberately and after separate warnings, not using the manual of style correctly on the same page. None of your reverts of my edits use edit summaries either. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 20:19, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Look Tye was contracted by Gujarat lions for 2016 Ipl and he was available for the whole tournament but the team did not select him and he is contracted by Kings XI Punjab for this year's Ipl but still you remove that information Slimshady75 ( talk) 20:22, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Kane Williamson did not play for Yorkshire in 2015 and 2017 but still in his profile you edit and mention 2013 - 2018 isn't that misleading?? Slimshady75 ( talk) 20:42, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
In Kane Williamson's Wikipedia page you can click on refrence no. 2 - List of First class matches played by Kane Williamson, there you will find out. In 2015 he was signed as a replacement for Aaron Finch but later when Finch was not selected in Australia's odi squad he was re signed by Yorkshire instead of Williamson and Kw did not play for Yorkshire in 2015, and in 2017 Kw played for Barbados Tridents in Cpl and he did not play and match in any format for Yorkshire, you can even check this on ESPN cricinfo website Slimshady75 ( talk) 02:34, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Kw has played at least one first class match every year for Northern Districts every year since his FC debut, but he did not play for Yorkshire in 2015 and 2017 so it is misleading Slimshady75 ( talk) 06:46, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Similarly Andrew Tye was also contracted by Gujarat Lions for the 2016 season and he was available for the whole tournament but you remove that info from his profile Slimshady75 ( talk) 06:56, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Sean Marsh shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
This is non-negotiable. You need to read and understand what you have done, change the article to how it was and respond here. If you continue to show you have no understanding of the basics of Wikipedia then there will be consequences.
Blue Square Thing (
talk)
20:52, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Blue Square Thing ( talk) 17:57, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Blue Square Thing ( talk) 07:37, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Edits: 1314; Edit summaries used: 0. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 20:42, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! ~SS49~ {talk} 13:36, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Please stop changing the tenfor value from 0 to n/a. Taking ten wickets in an innings is possible, so it should be a zero. You seem to be edit warring over this, and if you continue to do so, you could be blocked from editing. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 17:31, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
No player in the history of cricket has ever taken a 10 wicket haul in any of the limited overs format(domestic or international) so it is not possible Slimshady75 ( talk) 19:45, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
The first recognized 50 over domestic match was played in 1963, the first Odi in 1971, the first domestic T20 in 2003 and the first international T20 in 2005, so its been 56, 48, 16 and 14 years respectively since the first domestic and international 50 and 20 over game was played but till date no player from any team has ever picked up a 10 wicket haul so you need to understand this fact that it is not possible to get 10 wickets in any limited overs match Slimshady75 ( talk) 08:29, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
What you mentioned wasn't really a recognized cricket match it was at the under 19 level, I'm making a polite request the day someone picks up a 10 wicket haul in any limited overs format (Odi, LA, T20I, T20) you change the stats of every bowler but till then let it be n/a in the 10 Wicket haul column for limited overs cricket, possible?? Slimshady75 ( talk) 18:24, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Apart from Test matches and Fc cricket the profile of a player has any/all of these columns Odi, LA, T20I, T20 The best bowling figures in these formats are 1) Odi - 8/19 2) LA - 8/10 3) T20I - 6/8 4) T20 - 6/5 The profile doesn't include any other column so 10 WH column should have an N/a Slimshady75 ( talk) 16:43, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
What I'm saying is that normally the profile of a player has any/all of these columns Odi, LA, T20I and T20 and till date no player from any team has ever picked up a 10 wicket haul in any of these formats, the day someone picks up a 10 wicket haul in the above mentioned formats you change the stats from n/a to 0 but till then let it remain n/a. Possible? Slimshady75 ( talk) 20:12, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Well I'm just requesting you to kindly wait until someone takes a 10 wicket haul in any of the limited overs format until then let it be n/a, you can even check on ESPN cricinfo website if you click on the statsguru bowling analysis of a bowler for Odi and T20 format it will show only 2 columns 1) 4 wicket haul 2) 5 wicket haul, the column of a 10 wicket haul only shows up when you check the test record of any player, this shows that even they believe that it is impossible for someone to get a 10 wicket haul in limited overs cricket. Slimshady75 ( talk) 11:53, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
You keep adding the name of the team twice in Glenn Maxwell's profile while it is already mentioned once you can add the year in front of the team's name what is the need to mention the team's name again and again? Slimshady75 ( talk) 11:55, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. You have currently made 1,454 edits and used an edit summary once (the words "added content" when you were, in fact, reverting an edit made by someone else). It is not acceptable to not use edit summaries to explain your edits on this sort of basis. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 08:11, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Shaun Marsh is not contracted to Perth Scorchers 2018/19 was his last season, he is currently contracted to Melbourne Renegades and the other thing when he has played for a same team in 2 different years the year number can be added in front of the team's name there is no need to mention the team's name again and again Slimshady75 ( talk) 08:12, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting inappropriately and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 09:14, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
When a team's name is mentioned once you can add the year in front of the that name there is no need to mention the team's name again and again, there is absolutely nothing wrong in that no one feels any difficulty in reading from that, you are the only person who thinks that it is incorrect, I have shown it to many other people they consider it absolutely fine so kindly do not write a team's name again and again. Slimshady75 ( talk) 10:05, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
At least allow me to write the name of the team in a proper way what's the use of writing the team's name without using brackets Slimshady75 ( talk) 12:24, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Adam Voges shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 11:01, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Why do you think that his T20I stats should not be included in his profile Slimshady75 ( talk) 11:02, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting inappropriately and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 16:35, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Harry Gurney has given up red ball cricket and he is more of a T20 specialist now so is it not important for people to know about his domestic T20 stats, you said that it is not necessary to include T20 stats in Adam Voges's profile but for someone who specializes in the shortest format isn't it necessary to include his numbers in that particular format? Slimshady75 ( talk) 20:58, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Whilst I'm at it, be aware that editing whilst not logged in counts in terms of 3RR and that that is a serious business. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 19:45, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Martin Guptil while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting inappropriately and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Again, this means you're at 3RR. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 19:46, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Martin Guptil shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Very clearly editing as an IP address as well as logged in editor. Passes duck test by a mile.
Blue Square Thing (
talk)
21:24, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Martin Guptill is New Zealand's leading run scorer in T20 Internationals and the 2nd highest run scorer in international T20IS in the world but still you think that people should not get to know his T20I numbers, instead you add the stats of a domestic format, do you really think this makes any sense? Slimshady75 ( talk) 21:30, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Martin Guptil, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You are consistently editing against the consensus agreed by the project since at least 2009. You're being disruptive and are headed for trouble if you continue to do so. You haven't read the infobox documentation and don't appear to understand anything about the idea of working with consensus or coming to an agreement about something. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 20:42, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You are consistently editing against the consensus agreed by the project since at least 2009 and doing so in a way which is unexplained as you continue to not appear to understand the importance of using edit summaries. You're being disruptive and are headed for trouble if you continue to do so. You haven't read the infobox documentation and don't appear to understand anything about the idea of working with consensus or coming to an agreement about something. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 06:29, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting inappropriately and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 16:53, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. I have reverted a number of unexplained edits that don't adhere to the infobox documentation. There are STANSDARDS that we stick to. One of those is explaining our edits. I'll take this to ANI in the morning - your edits are utterly irresponsible and demonstrate a total lack of understanding of how wikipedia works. You need action taken against you at this point. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 20:45, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
20:46, 2 May 2019 (UTC)I've reset the clock on your block as you are clearly evading the block through logged-out edits here. You cannot edit under any account or IP while this block is in place. If this continues, I will block you indefinitely.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 15:40, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi Slimshady75! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 13 October 2018 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Sanam Re, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jim1138 ( talk) 07:31, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
The exact same thing has been written twice that's why I removed it Slimshady75 ( talk) 07:33, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello. In New Zealand English we write numbers greater than 999 with commas as separators - so 5342 is written as 5,432; 10654231 is written as 10,654,231. This improves readability and maintains the style users will expect to see on an article associated with that country. The style of English expected in an article is often specified as a note within the wiki code at the top of the page. In the case of New Zealand English you can find this laid out in the New Zealand governments own style guides here and here for example. On wikipedia there is a section at WP:DIGITS that also makes this clear.
Please stop changing number formats away from those in general use in the country the article is associated with. It is disruptive. The same style is used for numbers greater than 999 in Australia, the UK and South Africa as well.
You should also know that we use long dashes to separate years rather than the minus sign on your keyboard - so, we would use 2000–2005 not 2000-2005.
In the infoboxes for cricketers, please don't add in last match played when it's not already in the article (the problem if articles not being updated frequently means that this actually creates significant reliability issues) and don't change dates for infobox stats unless you're actually updating the statistics - and certainly don't chnange them to a previous date. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 16:27, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Well I didn't know that so I won't change it but you can check the profile of any cricketer everywhere it is mentioned that when and against whom he played his last odi/T20/test match so why do you remove that?? Slimshady75 ( talk) 16:51, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
And second thing is that I change the statistics/dates whenever the player plays any match Slimshady75 ( talk) 16:55, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
I will not let that happen (incorrect dates) and I will make sure that I update the date and stats whenever Adam Milne plays any international/domestic match so kindly allow me to write the dates of his last odi and T20I in his Wikipedia profile Slimshady75 ( talk) 20:36, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Trent Boult, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please read the template documentation at Template:Infobox cricketer, in particular the note about using endash in the Club section and the note in the Stats section about which types of matches we usually include. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 12:59, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
You can check the player profile of any cricketer everywhere his T20I stats are mentioned kindly don't change them and add his List A stats as T20 is the most popular form in cricket and most people don't even know the full form of LA, second thing is that Trent Boult has been retained by Delhi Daredevils team for the upcoming Ipl so he is currently contracted to that team. Slimshady75 ( talk) 14:16, 2 December 2018 (UTC):
The dash issue is a very small thing but you need to realise that it is important to show the stats of a player in an international format (T20) and not his domestic stats and second Thing I am telling you again Trent Boult has been retained by Delhi Daredevils team for the upcoming Ipl so he is currently contracted to that team plz allow me to write his international T20I stats Slimshady75 ( talk) 14:38, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
The year is about to end very soon Slimshady75 ( talk) 14:55, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Travis Head, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bowler ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:27, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 18:36, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please see MOS:DATERANGE, read it and follow it. This is part of the MOS - it is not negotiable. To revert edits without using an edit summary and break the MOS at the same time is essentially vandalism. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 16:36, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Blue Square Thing ( talk) 16:40, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Andrew Tye. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. The manual of style is not optional. See MOS:DATERANGE. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 06:19, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. MOS:DATEFORMAT is very clear about the non-use of spaces between dates when they are used in the way they are in the infobox. Given your unwillingness to engage in discussion about this issue, your inability to follow the Manual of Style and your use of blank edit summaries, this is beginning to look like deliberate vandalism now. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 16:30, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Look Andrew Tye, Ish Sodhi, Trent Boult Colin Munro have all been retained by their Ipl teams which means they are contracted to those teams that is why I edit their profile and write the word present with the year so why you remove that?? Second thing in Martin Guptill's profile Derbyshire is already mentioned once you can add the year next to that why is the need to write Derbyshire while it is already mentioned Slimshady75 ( talk) 17:22, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Blue Square Thing. Your recent edit to the page Harry Gurney appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The infobox is used for teams the player has played for, not ones that they might do so in the future. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 19:00, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Harry Gurney was picked up by Kolkata Knight Riders in the Ipl auction and he was also signed by Quetta Gladiators in the Psl draft which means he will play for both of those teams this year so how do you think that this information is incorrect? Slimshady75 ( talk) 20:07, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Whether he plays or not is something which cannot be said right now but since he has signed with those teams so it required to mention about those teams in his profile if he doesn't play then that information can be removed later Slimshady75 ( talk) 20:19, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Andrew Tye. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. You are also quite deliberately and after separate warnings, not using the manual of style correctly on the same page. None of your reverts of my edits use edit summaries either. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 20:19, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Look Tye was contracted by Gujarat lions for 2016 Ipl and he was available for the whole tournament but the team did not select him and he is contracted by Kings XI Punjab for this year's Ipl but still you remove that information Slimshady75 ( talk) 20:22, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Kane Williamson did not play for Yorkshire in 2015 and 2017 but still in his profile you edit and mention 2013 - 2018 isn't that misleading?? Slimshady75 ( talk) 20:42, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
In Kane Williamson's Wikipedia page you can click on refrence no. 2 - List of First class matches played by Kane Williamson, there you will find out. In 2015 he was signed as a replacement for Aaron Finch but later when Finch was not selected in Australia's odi squad he was re signed by Yorkshire instead of Williamson and Kw did not play for Yorkshire in 2015, and in 2017 Kw played for Barbados Tridents in Cpl and he did not play and match in any format for Yorkshire, you can even check this on ESPN cricinfo website Slimshady75 ( talk) 02:34, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Kw has played at least one first class match every year for Northern Districts every year since his FC debut, but he did not play for Yorkshire in 2015 and 2017 so it is misleading Slimshady75 ( talk) 06:46, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Similarly Andrew Tye was also contracted by Gujarat Lions for the 2016 season and he was available for the whole tournament but you remove that info from his profile Slimshady75 ( talk) 06:56, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Sean Marsh shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
This is non-negotiable. You need to read and understand what you have done, change the article to how it was and respond here. If you continue to show you have no understanding of the basics of Wikipedia then there will be consequences.
Blue Square Thing (
talk)
20:52, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Blue Square Thing ( talk) 17:57, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Blue Square Thing ( talk) 07:37, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Edits: 1314; Edit summaries used: 0. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 20:42, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! ~SS49~ {talk} 13:36, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Please stop changing the tenfor value from 0 to n/a. Taking ten wickets in an innings is possible, so it should be a zero. You seem to be edit warring over this, and if you continue to do so, you could be blocked from editing. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 17:31, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
No player in the history of cricket has ever taken a 10 wicket haul in any of the limited overs format(domestic or international) so it is not possible Slimshady75 ( talk) 19:45, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
The first recognized 50 over domestic match was played in 1963, the first Odi in 1971, the first domestic T20 in 2003 and the first international T20 in 2005, so its been 56, 48, 16 and 14 years respectively since the first domestic and international 50 and 20 over game was played but till date no player from any team has ever picked up a 10 wicket haul so you need to understand this fact that it is not possible to get 10 wickets in any limited overs match Slimshady75 ( talk) 08:29, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
What you mentioned wasn't really a recognized cricket match it was at the under 19 level, I'm making a polite request the day someone picks up a 10 wicket haul in any limited overs format (Odi, LA, T20I, T20) you change the stats of every bowler but till then let it be n/a in the 10 Wicket haul column for limited overs cricket, possible?? Slimshady75 ( talk) 18:24, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Apart from Test matches and Fc cricket the profile of a player has any/all of these columns Odi, LA, T20I, T20 The best bowling figures in these formats are 1) Odi - 8/19 2) LA - 8/10 3) T20I - 6/8 4) T20 - 6/5 The profile doesn't include any other column so 10 WH column should have an N/a Slimshady75 ( talk) 16:43, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
What I'm saying is that normally the profile of a player has any/all of these columns Odi, LA, T20I and T20 and till date no player from any team has ever picked up a 10 wicket haul in any of these formats, the day someone picks up a 10 wicket haul in the above mentioned formats you change the stats from n/a to 0 but till then let it remain n/a. Possible? Slimshady75 ( talk) 20:12, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Well I'm just requesting you to kindly wait until someone takes a 10 wicket haul in any of the limited overs format until then let it be n/a, you can even check on ESPN cricinfo website if you click on the statsguru bowling analysis of a bowler for Odi and T20 format it will show only 2 columns 1) 4 wicket haul 2) 5 wicket haul, the column of a 10 wicket haul only shows up when you check the test record of any player, this shows that even they believe that it is impossible for someone to get a 10 wicket haul in limited overs cricket. Slimshady75 ( talk) 11:53, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
You keep adding the name of the team twice in Glenn Maxwell's profile while it is already mentioned once you can add the year in front of the team's name what is the need to mention the team's name again and again? Slimshady75 ( talk) 11:55, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. You have currently made 1,454 edits and used an edit summary once (the words "added content" when you were, in fact, reverting an edit made by someone else). It is not acceptable to not use edit summaries to explain your edits on this sort of basis. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 08:11, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Shaun Marsh is not contracted to Perth Scorchers 2018/19 was his last season, he is currently contracted to Melbourne Renegades and the other thing when he has played for a same team in 2 different years the year number can be added in front of the team's name there is no need to mention the team's name again and again Slimshady75 ( talk) 08:12, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting inappropriately and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 09:14, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
When a team's name is mentioned once you can add the year in front of the that name there is no need to mention the team's name again and again, there is absolutely nothing wrong in that no one feels any difficulty in reading from that, you are the only person who thinks that it is incorrect, I have shown it to many other people they consider it absolutely fine so kindly do not write a team's name again and again. Slimshady75 ( talk) 10:05, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
At least allow me to write the name of the team in a proper way what's the use of writing the team's name without using brackets Slimshady75 ( talk) 12:24, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Adam Voges shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 11:01, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Why do you think that his T20I stats should not be included in his profile Slimshady75 ( talk) 11:02, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting inappropriately and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 16:35, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Harry Gurney has given up red ball cricket and he is more of a T20 specialist now so is it not important for people to know about his domestic T20 stats, you said that it is not necessary to include T20 stats in Adam Voges's profile but for someone who specializes in the shortest format isn't it necessary to include his numbers in that particular format? Slimshady75 ( talk) 20:58, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Whilst I'm at it, be aware that editing whilst not logged in counts in terms of 3RR and that that is a serious business. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 19:45, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Martin Guptil while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting inappropriately and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Again, this means you're at 3RR. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 19:46, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Martin Guptil shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Very clearly editing as an IP address as well as logged in editor. Passes duck test by a mile.
Blue Square Thing (
talk)
21:24, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Martin Guptill is New Zealand's leading run scorer in T20 Internationals and the 2nd highest run scorer in international T20IS in the world but still you think that people should not get to know his T20I numbers, instead you add the stats of a domestic format, do you really think this makes any sense? Slimshady75 ( talk) 21:30, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Martin Guptil, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You are consistently editing against the consensus agreed by the project since at least 2009. You're being disruptive and are headed for trouble if you continue to do so. You haven't read the infobox documentation and don't appear to understand anything about the idea of working with consensus or coming to an agreement about something. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 20:42, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You are consistently editing against the consensus agreed by the project since at least 2009 and doing so in a way which is unexplained as you continue to not appear to understand the importance of using edit summaries. You're being disruptive and are headed for trouble if you continue to do so. You haven't read the infobox documentation and don't appear to understand anything about the idea of working with consensus or coming to an agreement about something. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 06:29, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting inappropriately and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 16:53, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. I have reverted a number of unexplained edits that don't adhere to the infobox documentation. There are STANSDARDS that we stick to. One of those is explaining our edits. I'll take this to ANI in the morning - your edits are utterly irresponsible and demonstrate a total lack of understanding of how wikipedia works. You need action taken against you at this point. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 20:45, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
20:46, 2 May 2019 (UTC)I've reset the clock on your block as you are clearly evading the block through logged-out edits here. You cannot edit under any account or IP while this block is in place. If this continues, I will block you indefinitely.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 15:40, 3 May 2019 (UTC)