![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi, I have a quick question. Why isn't SineBot designed so that it or another bot automatically adds Template:Uw-tilde to the talk page of the person who didn't sign his post? I've noticed that, despite the banners and such, a lot of IP editors and new editors don't sign their posts, but mostly because they didn't know they needed to. So wouldn't SineBot be more helpful if it could also auto-add the notice template? Just wondering. Guoguo12 --Talk-- 19:08, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Hiya.
I'm guessing the above came about because it tried to put quotation marks around the section edited when the user in fact was editing the entire page instead. It's an exceptionally minor thing, but there's always the chance you feel like working on it.
Just thought I'd bring it to your attention. A F K When Needed 23:20, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
SineBot is "auto-signing" comments on Talk:SecureCRT that I had already signed. Any idea why it's doing that? -Stian 10:36, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the edit war at 2009 Little Caesars Pizza Bowl doesn't seem to be over as an anonymous editor changed it back to Bband11th's preference and cited the same reaons. If the anonymous editors aren't him, they only work on the same things he does and cite the same reasons for changing it back. The pages may need protection and so far attempts to discuss this have failed (not just today but previously too). This is ridiculous -- JonRidinger ( talk) 06:40, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi Kurt,
My proposal for a link for Timy-Soft is:
QUOTE Timy-Soft is a Business Software provided as part of an Excel based Time and Attendance System. Timy-Soft makes use of Excel macros and Visual Basic to automatically create employee time sheets when individuals are registered in the application. The application manages security for all employee time sheets, preventing unauthorised access through other methods, such as attempts to open time sheet data files without using the application itself. UNQUOTE
This article is intended to enable a reference to Timy-Soft in the table 'Comparison of time tracking software'.
On the same tabulation ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_time_tracking_software) ITimeSheet and Tenrox have been tagged as ads, but remain listed. All other products have links to articles that most readers would consider as advertising.
Thorley ( talk) 10:23, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
I tell you, the last three or four weeks here onthe various wikis have been just nuts. I was being stalked by a user who'd been banned by Jimbo for good reason; another banned vandal decided to join in the fun. So, anything having to do with these knuckleheads were being blocked just for good measure. The one really nasty vandal had to resort to proxies, so that's probably one I'd blocked for good measure. I'll unblock it ASAP. -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 21:18, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
I signed my paragraph, and the bot re-signed it, though it wasn't needed. Please look into the issue and try to fix it. Thank you. Gryllida 00:55, 5 September 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gryllida ( talk • contribs)
I set you an email a week ago but never received a response. FinalRapture - † ☪ 23:16, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
I dont know if it was a joke but sine bot told me to contact you so i want to say thanks for telling me to put my signature on stuff so yeah lol —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skullsbud ( talk • contribs) 21:20, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
i just sent a message saying thx for telling me to put my name on something so -- Skullsbud ( talk) 21:21, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
just lettin' u know dude -- weev talk 2 me G N A A™ 20:29, 9 September 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Weev ( talk • contribs)
Please make your bot avoid user subpages, such as mine. Softarch Jon ( talk) 04:08, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
i swear on the wiki gods that i am using the 4 ~'s when signing my name. however, it doesnt sign it the way i think you want it to. please advise? also, see below, as this is what happens when i leave the 4 ~'s:
-E 23:32, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
help.
~ericka. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Empress Ericka ( talk • contribs) 23:32, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
May you move WWE Tag Team Championship (2002-2010) to WWE Tag Team Championship (its okay to get rid of the disambiguation its not needed anymore), and move WWE Tag Team Championship (2010-present) to Unified WWE Tag Team Championship. These changes need to be reflected in which the company decided to continue the lineage of its original 2002 title. Thank you-- Truco 503 04:16, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Okay. But i did provide references in the new articles created by me under the external links sections. And also, the other edits made by me are all minor edits and also very commonly known world wide, then why does anyone would want reference to it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poddarrishabh ( talk • contribs) 05:45, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
And... I'm planning on borrowing a few of your userboxes. Best, ROBERTMFROMLI TALK/ CNTRB 05:46, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Add a way to opt-out of getting messages from SineBot (I know I keep forgetting to add the tildes, which means I edit them in right after)
Add a way to opt-out of sinebot signing your posts, but have it message you that you forgot, with a link to the edit.
Add a way to opt-in to have sinebot sign your posts with the generic signature three/four tildes creates (or even a custom signature/your custom signature?) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mofuggin bob ( talk • contribs) 13:40, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
I would like to try re-writing an article that was deleted. The entry was about a pioneer of solar energy research and education in the United States. May I try gain? The page that was deleted was here: [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trypnotik ( talk • contribs) 17:37, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob ( talk) 23:48, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi Slakr, I'm a friend of Bucket City Agency, and was interested in creating a wiki entry for the company. I read where you had deleted it. Please let me assert my reasons for wanting to create this page. It is important concerning many of the artists represented by the company. People like Charlie Louvin, T-Model Ford, and JoeBuck are just of the few artists on the roster for BCA. In order to properly interface with the current social networking facilities, it is necessary to include a wikipedia entry for the agency. It will be an integral part of networking the artists and their fans. Please let me know if this is suitable, or if some other venue should be pursued.
Regards, Doug Smith —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dougs510 ( talk • contribs) 01:29, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
I just got this message "Information.svg Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( Peter Ward 17:56, 25 September 2010 (UTC) ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Insert-signature.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:40, 25 September 2010 (UTC)"
As I'm signing my messages in this way (clicking on the signature button) I have no idea why I got this. There is an automatically entered signature at the end of my new messages when I save the page, and shortly afterwards a comment appears as if it wasn't signed. The page currently in question is Talk:10cc —Preceding unsigned comment added by Petergward ( talk • contribs) 17:56, 25 September 2010 (UTC) Peter Ward 17:58, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Slakr. I'm a bureaucrat from Chinese Wikipedia. I am intrested to build a robot which does similar works like User:ProcseeBot. Therefore, can you provide me the source code of that robot so I can run it directly after I get a permission from my community? Thanks. -- PhiLiP ( talk) 02:13, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello Slakr. See the block log for 88.187.16.37. ProcseeBot correctly identified him as an open proxy and blocked for two months. See WT:PHY#Large number of problematic edits. A blocked editor, Lysdexia, seems to be cruising around the web picking up open proxies, then returning to mess with physics articles. What are the chances that ProcseeBot could block open proxies for a worthwhile length of time, like one year? Is there a concern that the proxy-detection is not foolproof? I assume that when a human editor verifies a proxy he would be justified in blocking for five years. Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 02:45, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Looks to me like the above page is not on SineBot's list. If true, shouldn't it be? See here, for example.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 17:15, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Hidden categories: Non-talk pages that are automatically signed
Already is^ However, SineBot won't sign for a user with over 800 edits unless they opt-in. – xeno talk 22:29, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
A user recently posted on my talk page and incorrectly signed his username, putting a .com at the end of his username [2] (a n00b mistake, really). You'd hope SineBot might be wiser to it, but it wasn't, giving an edit summary repeating the link to the false userpage: [3] (edit summary: Dating comment by Chrisbrunner.com - ""). Your bot done goofed. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 20:30, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Sinebot added a timestamp to a signature that was already time stamped:
--
KMLP (
talk) 2:27 pm, Today (UTC−7) —Preceding
undated comment added 2:30 pm, Today (UTC−7).
Sinebot also got the time wrong. Whether it's an ongoing problem or not, the bot is not helping by adding the note that the comment posted and dated at 2:27 pm today was posted at 2:30 pm today.
[4]
-- KMLP ( talk) 21:56, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for making the bot fill in for some major flaws in the wiki software. If you have time, can you have it include a mention of which page the user forgot to sign?
Thanks for filling in. Good luck!
Veriss ( talk) 05:49, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
lamento pelo transtorno que fiz vc passa, eu estou arrependido por não ter respeitado a wikipedia que sempre me ajudou nais pesquisas que eu fiz. mais eu peço para que vc reconsidere, pois eu não vou cometer esse erro de novo. porque eu sei que a wikipedia e seria, e sei que o que eu fiz tambem e muito serio, porisso pesso desculpas. agora eu sei que isso e vandalismo pos na hora não passou pela minha cabeça.lamento! e me coloco a disposição para ajudar a com bater isso, pode cotar comigo.
Hello Slakr, Sinebot keeps signing posts I make with User:Alpha Quadrant (alt) even though I sign them. Example [5]. Is this a error? Thanks, -- Alpha Quadrant talk 16:49, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
ok i don't know how to move or how much i should move, but i did create a new archive page. but i messed up on that to and had to redirect it. you will see if you look, but if you can fix that too that would be great--Gerty 14:02, 18 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gdaly93 (talk • contribs)" just to let you know i use the sig button at the top to sign if that makes any difference. --Gerty 14:17, 18 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gdaly93 ( talk • contribs)
I have registered my nickname, Eagles247. Eagles 24/7 (C) 02:06, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I was undoing a vandalism 08:53, 19 October 2010 219.78.194.103 , but I could not, for an edit conflict, because in the meantime SinBot had signed it. If you look at the time stamp, there is one minute lag between the vandalism and SineBot intervention. I think perhaps it is better to wait, one hour or one day, say. It is not a urgent matter. -- GianniG46 ( talk) 09:11, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Manually, by copying and pasting, I think (and with risk of errors), if I do not have particular rights. Instead, for the bot I suppose it is not more difficult to modify past edits: it can look, for example, at the last hour (or few hours) edits. Or, it can look continuously, and, if it finds an unsigned item, it can annotate it on a file, and then check for it a few hours later. Otherwise, the accident I was signaling occurs almost always, because in talks vandalisms are rarely signed. -- GianniG46 ( talk) 08:55, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi. About this rm of yours, this IP vandal last warned on 29 March 2010, while he vandalized again today. I think we've got to be strict with such actions especially after final warning, other ways they won't take us serious and they'll continue vandalizing... A Macedonian ( talk) 09:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
I was under the impression, from things I've read before, that IP addresses can't opt out out of sinebot signing. Looking at the sinebot page this isn't stated. Am I mistaken? Cheers Nil Einne ( talk) 18:23, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
{{
NoAutosign}}
to their talk page, it should still work. That said, it's discouraged for all but static ips. --
slakr\
talk /
08:15, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
J made an autobiography of myself (Article: Can Balcioglu) and you deleted it even though I posted on its talk page that it was not a hoax and it was an autobiography. Please reverse this procedure Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blacklioncan ( talk • contribs) 17:54, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
99.184.231.13 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) which you just blocked, has in my estimation been unfairly treated as a vandal. I have evaluated the sum of their edits which were systematically reverted by user:Arthur Rubin, and I have found it necessary to reaffirm all edits done by the IP user as reasoned and appropriate, and as a consequence thereof I have reverted all undoings back to the state following IP user's edits. I encourage you to make a renewed venture into this matter. __ meco ( talk) 10:05, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Please monitor the Brunswick Records article and nip a brewing edit war in the bud. Steelbeard1 ( talk) 18:45, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
I think this page might be better for the Diff of Warning. [6] Random IP's had been taking out the "High Definition Graphics" picture that DCEovCE had placed into the article. They actually had to protect the page so it would stop. So I was actually trying to help keep DCE's contribution in the article at that time.-- Sexy Kick 07:51, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
I see that you were referring to the 3RR rule, Slakr, but I was reporting the guy for reverting edits since June (that's when I first noticed it). Interesting that he has been warned three times now without any consequences. DCEvoCE ( talk) 13:54, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Signbot has added a signature here that it should not have added. The history is that somebody removed an editor's contribution to a talk page and I restored it. It carries that editor's signature. Adding mine makes it appear that the comment is mine. I was only undoing censorship. -- Stfg ( talk) 10:56, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
It is also adding a signature when the user's signature points to its home wiki (not here at en.wp): Helder ( Talk) 14:07, 27 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Helder.wiki ( talk • contribs)
A talk page on my watchlist was just edited by SineBot, which is great. However I noticed that the was to a single section, but SineBot didn't mark it as such. Would it be possible for SineBot to make section edits wherever possible (so that there's a section link on my watchlist)? Thanks Rjwilmsi 20:54, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
please let me know how you would like to see the page improved. I am happy to do so...
Is it not similar to this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluskin_Sheff
Best regards, Jack ( A341672 ( talk) 21:34, 4 November 2010 (UTC))
I received this. Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( 84.217.70.124 ( talk) 02:07, 6 November 2010 (UTC) ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Insert-signature.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:05, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Cant to that, I dont have that key on my foreign keyboard!
Hi there, you deleted Talk:Blake Knight under G8, but the article is still there, at AfD. Could you please restore the talk page. Thanks. The-Pope ( talk) 16:35, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
See WP:AN3#User:Bluebadger1 reported by User:Soxwon (Result: 24h) for a case where knowing which edits are consecutive matters. (So they don't get counted as separate reverts). In my opinion, this is the most valuable thing which 3rr.php doesn't have yet. I wonder how hard it would be for the output to flag the consecutiveness of the edits. For example with an asterisk. EdJohnston ( talk) 03:00, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Please help me keep Chris Pumroy article on Wikipedia. I am the mother of a child with leukemia, and this man is raising money to help children like mine. He is notable with verifyable sources and this articles proposed deletion must be stopped. Please help. ( Calimonster ( talk) 12:59, 10 November 2010 (UTC))
please look at people's edit history before issuing warnings.all that ip has done is remove content Linguistic Geek 13:39, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
you issue me warnings for fighting borderline ip vandals.and i don't even get a reply.that is sorry to say plainly rude. Linguistic Geek 13:52, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
and that rationale is valid is it ?.if you have looked at the number of ips this chap uses and all he does is remove content with citations not only from this article but many related articles.how do you go to dispute resoltuion when the chap does not even respond on the talk page.seriously i shouldn't have got into this and should have left that article to be stub that it is. Linguistic Geek 14:06, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
great.thanks.my efforts are futile.cheers. Linguistic Geek 14:27, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
he is not a newbie.he uses various ips.i have been observing him for the past few months.i went after him yesterday because of it.all he does is remove content not only from this Tuluva article but various other article.btwn he is back with a new ip(all ips are from riyadh i think)on the tuluva page.also see his contribution on page Kasaragod Town.indulges in frivolous edit warrings and wastes time of serious editors. Linguistic Geek 07:09, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
more proof the ip is not a newbie uses mutiple ips and also has an account User:Pdheeru.used it when page got protected. Linguistic Geek 08:19, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
A discussion about longevity WP:COI has been initiated at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject World's Oldest People#End COI. As a recent contributor to this page, your comments are solicited. JJB 20:22, 11 November 2010 (UTC) (Redirected from User talk:SineBot) JJB 20:22, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello Slakr, here are my 2 cents [7] Tuscumbia ( talk) 13:46, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
I removed all logos, two screenshots and two photos from the article and subsequently removed the NFC tag. Please have a look at the current version of the article here and comment on the article's talk page if you agree with the changes (cause I fear they'll be reverted within the next few hours). Thanks. DCEvoCE ( talk) 17:36, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
I don't know if I can do it know, but there is an article being reviewed (Methark Technology), and I was trying to make a redirect from Methark. Can i do it with REDIRECT Methark Technology or should i wait for the article to be published? To access the article please Click here
Thanks in advance, Mark Garret 18:18, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi Slakr, your bot make mistakes, assigns the unsigned on me for mistake! Why? « CA » Talk 16:45, 25 November 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by « CA » ( talk • contribs)
Your botling's userpage sent me here, as it wasn't interested in hearing my tale of woe. I showed up because I'm actually curious as to how this happened, as I've not had bad results in the past...
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts&diff=399601571&oldid=399597976
As you can see by backtracking from that, SineBot dutifully added my 'signature' (or, rather, my IP), to a comment that I had, also quite dutifully, marked with the appropriate sign against evil--that is to say, my edit summary included one of the two optional remedies you have provided to keep this evil beast from spattering our unmentionables across the Intartube in plain text.
This hasn't actually happened to me before that I can recall (which may not mean anything, given that I don't tend to revisit my comments at a later time; even I don't listen to myself too intently), but it definitely happened this time.
Also, I had a question: in instances like this, we aren't given an 'edit summary' to fill out. What, then, should be done to keep the evil at bay? Could SineBot not be convinced to simply not pester those of us who, for the sake of our own health and sanity, don't have accounts at Wikipedia?
is this how you sign okay, see? Okay, see? ( talk) 05:29, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi, the signatures that SineBot is adding use
and this is creating very strange effects if you alter the text size in your browser (which I do, to help my eyes). From sandbox experiments, I believe the double-quote after "smaller;" may be the cause. -- Stfg ( talk) 10:43, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
{{
unsigned}}
and {{
undated}}
. If there's something amiss with those templates, it'd be best to bring it up on their talk page and/or make an {{
editprotected}}
request. --
slakr\
talk /
12:13, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
{{
undated}}
and I've left a message there. But I can't be expected to know which templates you use and how you combine them. That's implementation detail of your bot. I've done as much as I can. --
Stfg (
talk)
16:26, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
This username is against username policy and is being used for inappropriate editing. Can you please investigate? Thanks!! jsfouche ☽☾ Talk 06:05, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
The 3RR report helper tool does not have the field "Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page". Is it possible to add it? The helper tool is very helpful. TFD ( talk) 17:38, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Yes, I will admit that my usage of the tool was inappropriate, partly due to my great impatience and weariness at the time; I really shouldn't be doing any editing from 01:00 to 03:00. All last night and this morning, I was even preparing for the possibility of a 24-hour (what's with the popularity of 31?) block, so... Well do I get a chance to re-apply for rollback around the Northern summer solstice? -- HXL 's Roundtable, and Record 13:24, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Dear user Slakr, Recently you speedily deleted an article I was just starting to write: The New Message from God. I am writing this to ask you to reconsider your decision, and perhaps use the proposed deletion template instead, to give the article a chance. I believe the article has the potential to become encyclopedic. This article's subject matter has been covered in several radio stations nation wide and has several published books. I believe notability can be established for this non-commercial, non-profit organization.
A little about me: I am not advocate for anything within wikipedia, but I am interested in the major religions of the world as well as religious articles relating to New Age organizations. I plan to become and active participant in the WikiProject Wikipedia:WikiProject Religion. I objectively engage in the study of anything related to human spirituality.
Please reconsider your decision.
Respectfully, -- JDIAZ001 ( talk) 17:51, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
{{
db-g7}}
. On the other hand, if you're certain you want it back in the main space, feel free to move it back (I won't re-delete it). --
slakr\
talk /
20:56, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
I'm placing four tildes yet I just got a message saying that I didn't. What's wrong? --Taylor Reints 21:25, 12 December 2010 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DeinonychusDinosaur999 ( talk • contribs)
I just noticed an IP user removing signatures added by SineBot ( example). From WP:SIGN I see that all talk posts must be signed. Would it be possible for the bot to notice when SineBot-generated signatures are removed and restore them? -- Mepolypse ( talk) 17:20, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
I am disappointed that this has been declined, as the editor now sees it as vindication that he was technically correct all along. Two hours after it was declined, they reverted the edit in question with the summary, "Edit Warning was rejected." Since then they've been on a roll, re-applying these same claims to a range of articles. They left it with jet engine claiming that the Coandă-1910 was the first jet engined aircraft, with fuel burning in a duct, to fly in 1910: three claims that have absolutely no place there.
(also at WP:AN/EW) Andy Dingley ( talk) 11:44, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Waaaay back in August there was a discussion at Talk:2009 Little Caesars Pizza Bowl#Point spreads on college football games regarding the seemingly endless edit warring between two styles of expressing point spreads. The same anonymous editor ( Special:Contributions/64.183.42.63) has returned to this article for the same reason, and has done it with other related articles with the same unhelpful edit summaries and "revert until the other person gives up" mentality. He/She reverts the articles every few days or weeks. Perhaps some or all of them need some protection from new and unregistered users. The user's original account (likely Bband11th ( talk · contribs)) was blocked in August for ignoring edit warring warnings. Thanks for your time. -- JonRidinger ( talk) 04:20, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Sorry not to reply earlier. The template for reporting 3RR says, "You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too." Administrators may also protect a page if there is no discussion. TFD ( talk) 00:31, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I was told to turn to you. I do not really know who you are, but here is the topic I want to discuss:
Slovio is the first viable and usable inter-slavic langauge created since the demise of Old Church Slavonic, it was created in 1999 Websites: www.slovio.com www.interslavic.org, www.youtube.com/interslavic etc, etc. The creation of Slovio has "inspired" more than a dozen plagiarized copy-cat language "projects". One or several of the plagiators have been behind the removal of the article from wikipedia, and one of them especially, Jan van Steenbergen (Ijseren) to this day keeps removing all links to Slovio and keeps re-writing history and facts. In fact he has made from wikipedia his own PRIVATE and CENSORED encyclopedia for self-promotion. I want to caution you that Mr Steenbergen has several wikipedia logins (check the IPs) so it would not be so obvious what he is doing and altering. He is promoting his own "language" Slovianski, which he had "created" in 2006, after he has been a long-time member of various Slovio-forums, including forums on Yahoo and www.blognik.com. His "sudden creative inspiration" was a to make a plagiarized copy of Slovio and subsequently erase all mention of Slovio from wikipedia, as well the constant re-writing of history of Slavic conlangs in order to promote his own plagiarized copy-cat language. Please restore Slovio to its proper place and ban, permanently Mr Jan van Steenbergen (and all his logins)from Wikipedia. his censorship, self-promotion and removal and alteration of facts are only hurting wikipedia reputation. By the way the most important and most influential, the first and the original interslavic language of the modern era SLOVIO has been removed from wikipedia because it wasnt important enough, but about a dozen half-witted "linguistic creations" of Mr Jan van Steenbergen, and others found a place in wikipedia. ?!? Please check carefully the entire history of Mr Steenbergens "contributions and alterations" (under all his variou logins) in order to get and idea about the size of fraud and censorship that is going on here.
This is a real irony that the original interslavic language SLOVIO craeted in 1999 has been deleted and the name banned from re-creation, while such half-witted copy-cat projects as Slovianski, etc, have been allowed. By the way Slovianski and other copy-cat projects based on Slovio violate my copy rights. Yes it appears that IJzeren (Jan van Steenbergen) had at the time of deletion supported Slovio, but under his other logins he had opposed it and inspired deletion. He had bragged about his different logins on forums, I have no proof, only suspicion. Perhaps you can check it through your archives.
Please let me know why are you opposed to Slovio, the webpage that has not been created by me but by independent (to me unknown) users. The reason why I had finally registered was to get the record straight. In the meantime Mr Jan van Steenbergen is doing a real terror against me in forums and on the internet calling me various insulting names. I have never met the man, I just believe that his hate stems from the fact that he wants to destroy Slovio and me in order to rewrite the history (as was being done in wikipedia) and make himself the originator of the interslavic language idea. Just check google, I am sure you will find websites where he is insulting me and calling me all the dirtiest names one can think of. Why are you blocking the website? Is he a friend of yours? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blognik ( talk • contribs) 13:43, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Minutes ago a page i had recently added and was currently in the middle of editing was deleted. I wrote the "hang on" bit on the page as suggested by the speedy deletion memo, however it is possible i had written this in an incorrect format. I do realize that at the time the page did not demonstrate the significance of the subjectas was stated by the deleter, but it is only because i had not gotten there yet and was still working on constructing the page and figuring out the script commands, (being a relatively new wikipedia contributor and a first time page creator). anyways the subject of my page was a rising star, actor and incredibly accomplished martial artist who i believe deserves to be recognized. He has played in several large movies before including Jackie Chan's Honor as well as Break starring David Carradine. He is the creator of the "Urban Ninja" video on youtube which at one time was the 3rd most viewed video on the site of all time. He appeared in the 2009 season of american gladiators playing the gladiator "Zen", has played in numerous commercials for companys such as K-Swiss, Mattel, Darian Lakes and was also features in the music video for Weezer's song Pork and Beans. He is also the founder of the EMC Monkeys, a highly successful martial arts and stunts group based out of West Minster, California. He has a huge cult following and has been publicly recognized by Jackie Chan, who showcased him on his reality show The Diciple, and even Tina Turner who hired him to be the half time show for her final world tour last year. He is becoming more and more famous and in my oppinion is deserving of a wikipedia page. I hope i have argued my case sufficiently and i would be very thankful if you would restore my page and give me an opportunity to bring it up to standards before reavaluating it. Thank you very much for your time, Archangelt. ps. the pages name was "Xin Wuku: The Urban Ninja" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Archanelt ( talk • contribs) 07:24, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi there, you deleted a page that my friend and me wrote for the charity "Voice for Disability" for "blatant advertising", and we were wondering what needed changing in it in order for it to not be deleted...
As far as I can see there are tons of similar pages on Wikipedia (such as schools sites) that do exactly the same thing, so we were a bit confused!
Any help would be much appreciated,
Thanks,
Tim — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Timwest612 (
talk •
contribs)
19:35, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
He is not a blatant hoax. Please stop removing his page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kanden15 ( talk • contribs) 06:17, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
why u delete my thing — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sexychick1991 ( talk • contribs) 16:04, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
Regarding the blocking related to Coanda-1910, I will present the public Mea Culpa, when you'll explain me the rule I did break. Thanks in advance, with my WP:AAGF on your side.-- Lsorin ( talk) 13:05, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Sir: You are wasting my time. I am editing something I've written on the talk page of attachment theory and I have already had to redo it twice. I'm at the community college and need to get home before midnight, so bug off. (that's American. do you read?) If you want to discuss it do it on the talk page. Margaret9mary ( talk) 01:44, 29 December 2010 (UTC) Margaret9mary ( talk) 01:48, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Article titled Nuqudy has been deleted by you on grounds of a lack of notability. How would you change the article? Khalil al-Rahman ( talk) 12:49, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Good evening, Slakr. Earlier today I created an entry into the Wikipedia. Grizzly_tobacco And for some reason, You have deleted it, I read what you had posted on the entry, And if I may, or if it is even possible, See the previous entry on the "Grizzly Tobacco" subject. Secondly, by what I read("(G4: Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grizzly tobacco)") Are you pointing towards, Because another person had created the page badly, It cannot be remade? My page was almost an exact copy of Copenhagen_(tobacco) Yes theirs is still open? What I am getting at is, What was wrong with it, And what would I need to fix.
-- OutlaW1211 ( talk) 12:45, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
hello there,
I wonder how not to accept Laptop for all initiative as an important subject and definition since it is very important to the Palestinian community. Such initiative is a nationwide one and could be replicated worldwide for the poor.
I kindly ask to re-upload the page, if you want , please advise of the changes you want me to make to make it live.
thank you in advance; — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bdmanager ( talk • contribs) 14:38, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
What the hell did my page do it was for information reason u asshole — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ichgo245 ( talk • contribs) 00:30, 30 December 2010
Please re-consider the deletion of bthebusinessnetwork www.bthebusinessnetwork.com. The website lowers production costs and fossil fuel consumption of the business that use it, because it is a free online office where people can send each other work files, work on them, and discuss them individually, or in groups at the same time, anywhere in the world. The website also provides people with links to all the government websites (state and federal) that allow them to create their own business and pay their taxes online. This website IS significant in the world of business and it should be recognized by Wikipedia.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitch39everts ( talk • contribs) 03:31, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi Slakr,
I recently put up the iClothing page which was deleted. I have since rewritten the page to more closely follow the wikipeda guidelines and would like to post my new content up. How do I go about doing this?
Afpdb10 ( talk) 06:58, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Hey, I was checkin out the bthebusinessnetwork.com site and i think you shouldn't delete the page that was made for it. it looks like a pretty good site and i think it could end up being a really big and impportant thing for businesses. you should actually make an account and check it out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neolava2191 ( talk • contribs) 07:33, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
I have read this site for hours and tried to comply with everything yet you deleted both my article and my talk page within minutes without even giving me a reply. I really feel I am wasting my time. How can I talk about a particular piece of software without you saying it is blatant advertising? There are tons of articles just the same as the one I submitted. Look here Game Engines. Am I not allowed to start with a "stub" at least? I can't finish one big article in just one day, just to have it deleted. I am really trying here but I think you're a little trigger happy with the Delete button. Some meaningful help would be appreciated. Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by GLGX ( talk • contribs) 12:10, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Do you mean to tell me that all the applications listed at Game Engines that are on Wikipedia have more notability? There are like a hundred of them. But none can say they support the Web3D open standards. I am trying to understand you but I still can't say that I do. I know you're busy and have little time for reply but so am I and I spent hours yesterday working on your site. Thanks, GLGX ( talk) 14:51, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I am new to Wikipedia, and would enjoy some help with the page of the Lieutenant Governor-elect of Guam. The USER: Scanlan, continues to input biased information, which is verifiable, but I believe to be defamatory, considering Ray Tenorio goes into office in a few days. My edit is Neutral, and does not put Ray Tenorio in such a horrible light. Please help with this.
-Jeff
User: Mrgates — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrgates ( talk • contribs) 06:02, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Dave ( talk) 07:25, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi Slakr. I noticed you changed the DYK rules change template. I'm not sure if you've been following the discussion at WT:DYK over the past couple of months, but reviewing another nomination is now one of the requirements along with the existing requirements regarding article length, creation date, etc., so the change you made was not quite accurate. Perhaps we can work out a phrasing that's less "demanding" while still being clear that the requirement exists? 28bytes ( talk) 04:46, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi, I have a quick question. Why isn't SineBot designed so that it or another bot automatically adds Template:Uw-tilde to the talk page of the person who didn't sign his post? I've noticed that, despite the banners and such, a lot of IP editors and new editors don't sign their posts, but mostly because they didn't know they needed to. So wouldn't SineBot be more helpful if it could also auto-add the notice template? Just wondering. Guoguo12 --Talk-- 19:08, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Hiya.
I'm guessing the above came about because it tried to put quotation marks around the section edited when the user in fact was editing the entire page instead. It's an exceptionally minor thing, but there's always the chance you feel like working on it.
Just thought I'd bring it to your attention. A F K When Needed 23:20, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
SineBot is "auto-signing" comments on Talk:SecureCRT that I had already signed. Any idea why it's doing that? -Stian 10:36, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the edit war at 2009 Little Caesars Pizza Bowl doesn't seem to be over as an anonymous editor changed it back to Bband11th's preference and cited the same reaons. If the anonymous editors aren't him, they only work on the same things he does and cite the same reasons for changing it back. The pages may need protection and so far attempts to discuss this have failed (not just today but previously too). This is ridiculous -- JonRidinger ( talk) 06:40, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi Kurt,
My proposal for a link for Timy-Soft is:
QUOTE Timy-Soft is a Business Software provided as part of an Excel based Time and Attendance System. Timy-Soft makes use of Excel macros and Visual Basic to automatically create employee time sheets when individuals are registered in the application. The application manages security for all employee time sheets, preventing unauthorised access through other methods, such as attempts to open time sheet data files without using the application itself. UNQUOTE
This article is intended to enable a reference to Timy-Soft in the table 'Comparison of time tracking software'.
On the same tabulation ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_time_tracking_software) ITimeSheet and Tenrox have been tagged as ads, but remain listed. All other products have links to articles that most readers would consider as advertising.
Thorley ( talk) 10:23, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
I tell you, the last three or four weeks here onthe various wikis have been just nuts. I was being stalked by a user who'd been banned by Jimbo for good reason; another banned vandal decided to join in the fun. So, anything having to do with these knuckleheads were being blocked just for good measure. The one really nasty vandal had to resort to proxies, so that's probably one I'd blocked for good measure. I'll unblock it ASAP. -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 21:18, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
I signed my paragraph, and the bot re-signed it, though it wasn't needed. Please look into the issue and try to fix it. Thank you. Gryllida 00:55, 5 September 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gryllida ( talk • contribs)
I set you an email a week ago but never received a response. FinalRapture - † ☪ 23:16, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
I dont know if it was a joke but sine bot told me to contact you so i want to say thanks for telling me to put my signature on stuff so yeah lol —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skullsbud ( talk • contribs) 21:20, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
i just sent a message saying thx for telling me to put my name on something so -- Skullsbud ( talk) 21:21, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
just lettin' u know dude -- weev talk 2 me G N A A™ 20:29, 9 September 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Weev ( talk • contribs)
Please make your bot avoid user subpages, such as mine. Softarch Jon ( talk) 04:08, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
i swear on the wiki gods that i am using the 4 ~'s when signing my name. however, it doesnt sign it the way i think you want it to. please advise? also, see below, as this is what happens when i leave the 4 ~'s:
-E 23:32, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
help.
~ericka. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Empress Ericka ( talk • contribs) 23:32, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
May you move WWE Tag Team Championship (2002-2010) to WWE Tag Team Championship (its okay to get rid of the disambiguation its not needed anymore), and move WWE Tag Team Championship (2010-present) to Unified WWE Tag Team Championship. These changes need to be reflected in which the company decided to continue the lineage of its original 2002 title. Thank you-- Truco 503 04:16, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Okay. But i did provide references in the new articles created by me under the external links sections. And also, the other edits made by me are all minor edits and also very commonly known world wide, then why does anyone would want reference to it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poddarrishabh ( talk • contribs) 05:45, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
And... I'm planning on borrowing a few of your userboxes. Best, ROBERTMFROMLI TALK/ CNTRB 05:46, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Add a way to opt-out of getting messages from SineBot (I know I keep forgetting to add the tildes, which means I edit them in right after)
Add a way to opt-out of sinebot signing your posts, but have it message you that you forgot, with a link to the edit.
Add a way to opt-in to have sinebot sign your posts with the generic signature three/four tildes creates (or even a custom signature/your custom signature?) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mofuggin bob ( talk • contribs) 13:40, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
I would like to try re-writing an article that was deleted. The entry was about a pioneer of solar energy research and education in the United States. May I try gain? The page that was deleted was here: [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trypnotik ( talk • contribs) 17:37, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob ( talk) 23:48, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi Slakr, I'm a friend of Bucket City Agency, and was interested in creating a wiki entry for the company. I read where you had deleted it. Please let me assert my reasons for wanting to create this page. It is important concerning many of the artists represented by the company. People like Charlie Louvin, T-Model Ford, and JoeBuck are just of the few artists on the roster for BCA. In order to properly interface with the current social networking facilities, it is necessary to include a wikipedia entry for the agency. It will be an integral part of networking the artists and their fans. Please let me know if this is suitable, or if some other venue should be pursued.
Regards, Doug Smith —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dougs510 ( talk • contribs) 01:29, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
I just got this message "Information.svg Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( Peter Ward 17:56, 25 September 2010 (UTC) ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Insert-signature.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:40, 25 September 2010 (UTC)"
As I'm signing my messages in this way (clicking on the signature button) I have no idea why I got this. There is an automatically entered signature at the end of my new messages when I save the page, and shortly afterwards a comment appears as if it wasn't signed. The page currently in question is Talk:10cc —Preceding unsigned comment added by Petergward ( talk • contribs) 17:56, 25 September 2010 (UTC) Peter Ward 17:58, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Slakr. I'm a bureaucrat from Chinese Wikipedia. I am intrested to build a robot which does similar works like User:ProcseeBot. Therefore, can you provide me the source code of that robot so I can run it directly after I get a permission from my community? Thanks. -- PhiLiP ( talk) 02:13, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello Slakr. See the block log for 88.187.16.37. ProcseeBot correctly identified him as an open proxy and blocked for two months. See WT:PHY#Large number of problematic edits. A blocked editor, Lysdexia, seems to be cruising around the web picking up open proxies, then returning to mess with physics articles. What are the chances that ProcseeBot could block open proxies for a worthwhile length of time, like one year? Is there a concern that the proxy-detection is not foolproof? I assume that when a human editor verifies a proxy he would be justified in blocking for five years. Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 02:45, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Looks to me like the above page is not on SineBot's list. If true, shouldn't it be? See here, for example.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 17:15, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Hidden categories: Non-talk pages that are automatically signed
Already is^ However, SineBot won't sign for a user with over 800 edits unless they opt-in. – xeno talk 22:29, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
A user recently posted on my talk page and incorrectly signed his username, putting a .com at the end of his username [2] (a n00b mistake, really). You'd hope SineBot might be wiser to it, but it wasn't, giving an edit summary repeating the link to the false userpage: [3] (edit summary: Dating comment by Chrisbrunner.com - ""). Your bot done goofed. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 20:30, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Sinebot added a timestamp to a signature that was already time stamped:
--
KMLP (
talk) 2:27 pm, Today (UTC−7) —Preceding
undated comment added 2:30 pm, Today (UTC−7).
Sinebot also got the time wrong. Whether it's an ongoing problem or not, the bot is not helping by adding the note that the comment posted and dated at 2:27 pm today was posted at 2:30 pm today.
[4]
-- KMLP ( talk) 21:56, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for making the bot fill in for some major flaws in the wiki software. If you have time, can you have it include a mention of which page the user forgot to sign?
Thanks for filling in. Good luck!
Veriss ( talk) 05:49, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
lamento pelo transtorno que fiz vc passa, eu estou arrependido por não ter respeitado a wikipedia que sempre me ajudou nais pesquisas que eu fiz. mais eu peço para que vc reconsidere, pois eu não vou cometer esse erro de novo. porque eu sei que a wikipedia e seria, e sei que o que eu fiz tambem e muito serio, porisso pesso desculpas. agora eu sei que isso e vandalismo pos na hora não passou pela minha cabeça.lamento! e me coloco a disposição para ajudar a com bater isso, pode cotar comigo.
Hello Slakr, Sinebot keeps signing posts I make with User:Alpha Quadrant (alt) even though I sign them. Example [5]. Is this a error? Thanks, -- Alpha Quadrant talk 16:49, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
ok i don't know how to move or how much i should move, but i did create a new archive page. but i messed up on that to and had to redirect it. you will see if you look, but if you can fix that too that would be great--Gerty 14:02, 18 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gdaly93 (talk • contribs)" just to let you know i use the sig button at the top to sign if that makes any difference. --Gerty 14:17, 18 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gdaly93 ( talk • contribs)
I have registered my nickname, Eagles247. Eagles 24/7 (C) 02:06, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I was undoing a vandalism 08:53, 19 October 2010 219.78.194.103 , but I could not, for an edit conflict, because in the meantime SinBot had signed it. If you look at the time stamp, there is one minute lag between the vandalism and SineBot intervention. I think perhaps it is better to wait, one hour or one day, say. It is not a urgent matter. -- GianniG46 ( talk) 09:11, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Manually, by copying and pasting, I think (and with risk of errors), if I do not have particular rights. Instead, for the bot I suppose it is not more difficult to modify past edits: it can look, for example, at the last hour (or few hours) edits. Or, it can look continuously, and, if it finds an unsigned item, it can annotate it on a file, and then check for it a few hours later. Otherwise, the accident I was signaling occurs almost always, because in talks vandalisms are rarely signed. -- GianniG46 ( talk) 08:55, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi. About this rm of yours, this IP vandal last warned on 29 March 2010, while he vandalized again today. I think we've got to be strict with such actions especially after final warning, other ways they won't take us serious and they'll continue vandalizing... A Macedonian ( talk) 09:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
I was under the impression, from things I've read before, that IP addresses can't opt out out of sinebot signing. Looking at the sinebot page this isn't stated. Am I mistaken? Cheers Nil Einne ( talk) 18:23, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
{{
NoAutosign}}
to their talk page, it should still work. That said, it's discouraged for all but static ips. --
slakr\
talk /
08:15, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
J made an autobiography of myself (Article: Can Balcioglu) and you deleted it even though I posted on its talk page that it was not a hoax and it was an autobiography. Please reverse this procedure Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blacklioncan ( talk • contribs) 17:54, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
99.184.231.13 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) which you just blocked, has in my estimation been unfairly treated as a vandal. I have evaluated the sum of their edits which were systematically reverted by user:Arthur Rubin, and I have found it necessary to reaffirm all edits done by the IP user as reasoned and appropriate, and as a consequence thereof I have reverted all undoings back to the state following IP user's edits. I encourage you to make a renewed venture into this matter. __ meco ( talk) 10:05, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Please monitor the Brunswick Records article and nip a brewing edit war in the bud. Steelbeard1 ( talk) 18:45, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
I think this page might be better for the Diff of Warning. [6] Random IP's had been taking out the "High Definition Graphics" picture that DCEovCE had placed into the article. They actually had to protect the page so it would stop. So I was actually trying to help keep DCE's contribution in the article at that time.-- Sexy Kick 07:51, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
I see that you were referring to the 3RR rule, Slakr, but I was reporting the guy for reverting edits since June (that's when I first noticed it). Interesting that he has been warned three times now without any consequences. DCEvoCE ( talk) 13:54, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Signbot has added a signature here that it should not have added. The history is that somebody removed an editor's contribution to a talk page and I restored it. It carries that editor's signature. Adding mine makes it appear that the comment is mine. I was only undoing censorship. -- Stfg ( talk) 10:56, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
It is also adding a signature when the user's signature points to its home wiki (not here at en.wp): Helder ( Talk) 14:07, 27 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Helder.wiki ( talk • contribs)
A talk page on my watchlist was just edited by SineBot, which is great. However I noticed that the was to a single section, but SineBot didn't mark it as such. Would it be possible for SineBot to make section edits wherever possible (so that there's a section link on my watchlist)? Thanks Rjwilmsi 20:54, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
please let me know how you would like to see the page improved. I am happy to do so...
Is it not similar to this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluskin_Sheff
Best regards, Jack ( A341672 ( talk) 21:34, 4 November 2010 (UTC))
I received this. Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( 84.217.70.124 ( talk) 02:07, 6 November 2010 (UTC) ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Insert-signature.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:05, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Cant to that, I dont have that key on my foreign keyboard!
Hi there, you deleted Talk:Blake Knight under G8, but the article is still there, at AfD. Could you please restore the talk page. Thanks. The-Pope ( talk) 16:35, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
See WP:AN3#User:Bluebadger1 reported by User:Soxwon (Result: 24h) for a case where knowing which edits are consecutive matters. (So they don't get counted as separate reverts). In my opinion, this is the most valuable thing which 3rr.php doesn't have yet. I wonder how hard it would be for the output to flag the consecutiveness of the edits. For example with an asterisk. EdJohnston ( talk) 03:00, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Please help me keep Chris Pumroy article on Wikipedia. I am the mother of a child with leukemia, and this man is raising money to help children like mine. He is notable with verifyable sources and this articles proposed deletion must be stopped. Please help. ( Calimonster ( talk) 12:59, 10 November 2010 (UTC))
please look at people's edit history before issuing warnings.all that ip has done is remove content Linguistic Geek 13:39, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
you issue me warnings for fighting borderline ip vandals.and i don't even get a reply.that is sorry to say plainly rude. Linguistic Geek 13:52, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
and that rationale is valid is it ?.if you have looked at the number of ips this chap uses and all he does is remove content with citations not only from this article but many related articles.how do you go to dispute resoltuion when the chap does not even respond on the talk page.seriously i shouldn't have got into this and should have left that article to be stub that it is. Linguistic Geek 14:06, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
great.thanks.my efforts are futile.cheers. Linguistic Geek 14:27, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
he is not a newbie.he uses various ips.i have been observing him for the past few months.i went after him yesterday because of it.all he does is remove content not only from this Tuluva article but various other article.btwn he is back with a new ip(all ips are from riyadh i think)on the tuluva page.also see his contribution on page Kasaragod Town.indulges in frivolous edit warrings and wastes time of serious editors. Linguistic Geek 07:09, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
more proof the ip is not a newbie uses mutiple ips and also has an account User:Pdheeru.used it when page got protected. Linguistic Geek 08:19, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
A discussion about longevity WP:COI has been initiated at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject World's Oldest People#End COI. As a recent contributor to this page, your comments are solicited. JJB 20:22, 11 November 2010 (UTC) (Redirected from User talk:SineBot) JJB 20:22, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello Slakr, here are my 2 cents [7] Tuscumbia ( talk) 13:46, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
I removed all logos, two screenshots and two photos from the article and subsequently removed the NFC tag. Please have a look at the current version of the article here and comment on the article's talk page if you agree with the changes (cause I fear they'll be reverted within the next few hours). Thanks. DCEvoCE ( talk) 17:36, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
I don't know if I can do it know, but there is an article being reviewed (Methark Technology), and I was trying to make a redirect from Methark. Can i do it with REDIRECT Methark Technology or should i wait for the article to be published? To access the article please Click here
Thanks in advance, Mark Garret 18:18, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi Slakr, your bot make mistakes, assigns the unsigned on me for mistake! Why? « CA » Talk 16:45, 25 November 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by « CA » ( talk • contribs)
Your botling's userpage sent me here, as it wasn't interested in hearing my tale of woe. I showed up because I'm actually curious as to how this happened, as I've not had bad results in the past...
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts&diff=399601571&oldid=399597976
As you can see by backtracking from that, SineBot dutifully added my 'signature' (or, rather, my IP), to a comment that I had, also quite dutifully, marked with the appropriate sign against evil--that is to say, my edit summary included one of the two optional remedies you have provided to keep this evil beast from spattering our unmentionables across the Intartube in plain text.
This hasn't actually happened to me before that I can recall (which may not mean anything, given that I don't tend to revisit my comments at a later time; even I don't listen to myself too intently), but it definitely happened this time.
Also, I had a question: in instances like this, we aren't given an 'edit summary' to fill out. What, then, should be done to keep the evil at bay? Could SineBot not be convinced to simply not pester those of us who, for the sake of our own health and sanity, don't have accounts at Wikipedia?
is this how you sign okay, see? Okay, see? ( talk) 05:29, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi, the signatures that SineBot is adding use
and this is creating very strange effects if you alter the text size in your browser (which I do, to help my eyes). From sandbox experiments, I believe the double-quote after "smaller;" may be the cause. -- Stfg ( talk) 10:43, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
{{
unsigned}}
and {{
undated}}
. If there's something amiss with those templates, it'd be best to bring it up on their talk page and/or make an {{
editprotected}}
request. --
slakr\
talk /
12:13, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
{{
undated}}
and I've left a message there. But I can't be expected to know which templates you use and how you combine them. That's implementation detail of your bot. I've done as much as I can. --
Stfg (
talk)
16:26, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
This username is against username policy and is being used for inappropriate editing. Can you please investigate? Thanks!! jsfouche ☽☾ Talk 06:05, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
The 3RR report helper tool does not have the field "Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page". Is it possible to add it? The helper tool is very helpful. TFD ( talk) 17:38, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Yes, I will admit that my usage of the tool was inappropriate, partly due to my great impatience and weariness at the time; I really shouldn't be doing any editing from 01:00 to 03:00. All last night and this morning, I was even preparing for the possibility of a 24-hour (what's with the popularity of 31?) block, so... Well do I get a chance to re-apply for rollback around the Northern summer solstice? -- HXL 's Roundtable, and Record 13:24, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Dear user Slakr, Recently you speedily deleted an article I was just starting to write: The New Message from God. I am writing this to ask you to reconsider your decision, and perhaps use the proposed deletion template instead, to give the article a chance. I believe the article has the potential to become encyclopedic. This article's subject matter has been covered in several radio stations nation wide and has several published books. I believe notability can be established for this non-commercial, non-profit organization.
A little about me: I am not advocate for anything within wikipedia, but I am interested in the major religions of the world as well as religious articles relating to New Age organizations. I plan to become and active participant in the WikiProject Wikipedia:WikiProject Religion. I objectively engage in the study of anything related to human spirituality.
Please reconsider your decision.
Respectfully, -- JDIAZ001 ( talk) 17:51, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
{{
db-g7}}
. On the other hand, if you're certain you want it back in the main space, feel free to move it back (I won't re-delete it). --
slakr\
talk /
20:56, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
I'm placing four tildes yet I just got a message saying that I didn't. What's wrong? --Taylor Reints 21:25, 12 December 2010 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DeinonychusDinosaur999 ( talk • contribs)
I just noticed an IP user removing signatures added by SineBot ( example). From WP:SIGN I see that all talk posts must be signed. Would it be possible for the bot to notice when SineBot-generated signatures are removed and restore them? -- Mepolypse ( talk) 17:20, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
I am disappointed that this has been declined, as the editor now sees it as vindication that he was technically correct all along. Two hours after it was declined, they reverted the edit in question with the summary, "Edit Warning was rejected." Since then they've been on a roll, re-applying these same claims to a range of articles. They left it with jet engine claiming that the Coandă-1910 was the first jet engined aircraft, with fuel burning in a duct, to fly in 1910: three claims that have absolutely no place there.
(also at WP:AN/EW) Andy Dingley ( talk) 11:44, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Waaaay back in August there was a discussion at Talk:2009 Little Caesars Pizza Bowl#Point spreads on college football games regarding the seemingly endless edit warring between two styles of expressing point spreads. The same anonymous editor ( Special:Contributions/64.183.42.63) has returned to this article for the same reason, and has done it with other related articles with the same unhelpful edit summaries and "revert until the other person gives up" mentality. He/She reverts the articles every few days or weeks. Perhaps some or all of them need some protection from new and unregistered users. The user's original account (likely Bband11th ( talk · contribs)) was blocked in August for ignoring edit warring warnings. Thanks for your time. -- JonRidinger ( talk) 04:20, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Sorry not to reply earlier. The template for reporting 3RR says, "You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too." Administrators may also protect a page if there is no discussion. TFD ( talk) 00:31, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I was told to turn to you. I do not really know who you are, but here is the topic I want to discuss:
Slovio is the first viable and usable inter-slavic langauge created since the demise of Old Church Slavonic, it was created in 1999 Websites: www.slovio.com www.interslavic.org, www.youtube.com/interslavic etc, etc. The creation of Slovio has "inspired" more than a dozen plagiarized copy-cat language "projects". One or several of the plagiators have been behind the removal of the article from wikipedia, and one of them especially, Jan van Steenbergen (Ijseren) to this day keeps removing all links to Slovio and keeps re-writing history and facts. In fact he has made from wikipedia his own PRIVATE and CENSORED encyclopedia for self-promotion. I want to caution you that Mr Steenbergen has several wikipedia logins (check the IPs) so it would not be so obvious what he is doing and altering. He is promoting his own "language" Slovianski, which he had "created" in 2006, after he has been a long-time member of various Slovio-forums, including forums on Yahoo and www.blognik.com. His "sudden creative inspiration" was a to make a plagiarized copy of Slovio and subsequently erase all mention of Slovio from wikipedia, as well the constant re-writing of history of Slavic conlangs in order to promote his own plagiarized copy-cat language. Please restore Slovio to its proper place and ban, permanently Mr Jan van Steenbergen (and all his logins)from Wikipedia. his censorship, self-promotion and removal and alteration of facts are only hurting wikipedia reputation. By the way the most important and most influential, the first and the original interslavic language of the modern era SLOVIO has been removed from wikipedia because it wasnt important enough, but about a dozen half-witted "linguistic creations" of Mr Jan van Steenbergen, and others found a place in wikipedia. ?!? Please check carefully the entire history of Mr Steenbergens "contributions and alterations" (under all his variou logins) in order to get and idea about the size of fraud and censorship that is going on here.
This is a real irony that the original interslavic language SLOVIO craeted in 1999 has been deleted and the name banned from re-creation, while such half-witted copy-cat projects as Slovianski, etc, have been allowed. By the way Slovianski and other copy-cat projects based on Slovio violate my copy rights. Yes it appears that IJzeren (Jan van Steenbergen) had at the time of deletion supported Slovio, but under his other logins he had opposed it and inspired deletion. He had bragged about his different logins on forums, I have no proof, only suspicion. Perhaps you can check it through your archives.
Please let me know why are you opposed to Slovio, the webpage that has not been created by me but by independent (to me unknown) users. The reason why I had finally registered was to get the record straight. In the meantime Mr Jan van Steenbergen is doing a real terror against me in forums and on the internet calling me various insulting names. I have never met the man, I just believe that his hate stems from the fact that he wants to destroy Slovio and me in order to rewrite the history (as was being done in wikipedia) and make himself the originator of the interslavic language idea. Just check google, I am sure you will find websites where he is insulting me and calling me all the dirtiest names one can think of. Why are you blocking the website? Is he a friend of yours? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blognik ( talk • contribs) 13:43, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Minutes ago a page i had recently added and was currently in the middle of editing was deleted. I wrote the "hang on" bit on the page as suggested by the speedy deletion memo, however it is possible i had written this in an incorrect format. I do realize that at the time the page did not demonstrate the significance of the subjectas was stated by the deleter, but it is only because i had not gotten there yet and was still working on constructing the page and figuring out the script commands, (being a relatively new wikipedia contributor and a first time page creator). anyways the subject of my page was a rising star, actor and incredibly accomplished martial artist who i believe deserves to be recognized. He has played in several large movies before including Jackie Chan's Honor as well as Break starring David Carradine. He is the creator of the "Urban Ninja" video on youtube which at one time was the 3rd most viewed video on the site of all time. He appeared in the 2009 season of american gladiators playing the gladiator "Zen", has played in numerous commercials for companys such as K-Swiss, Mattel, Darian Lakes and was also features in the music video for Weezer's song Pork and Beans. He is also the founder of the EMC Monkeys, a highly successful martial arts and stunts group based out of West Minster, California. He has a huge cult following and has been publicly recognized by Jackie Chan, who showcased him on his reality show The Diciple, and even Tina Turner who hired him to be the half time show for her final world tour last year. He is becoming more and more famous and in my oppinion is deserving of a wikipedia page. I hope i have argued my case sufficiently and i would be very thankful if you would restore my page and give me an opportunity to bring it up to standards before reavaluating it. Thank you very much for your time, Archangelt. ps. the pages name was "Xin Wuku: The Urban Ninja" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Archanelt ( talk • contribs) 07:24, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi there, you deleted a page that my friend and me wrote for the charity "Voice for Disability" for "blatant advertising", and we were wondering what needed changing in it in order for it to not be deleted...
As far as I can see there are tons of similar pages on Wikipedia (such as schools sites) that do exactly the same thing, so we were a bit confused!
Any help would be much appreciated,
Thanks,
Tim — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Timwest612 (
talk •
contribs)
19:35, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
He is not a blatant hoax. Please stop removing his page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kanden15 ( talk • contribs) 06:17, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
why u delete my thing — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sexychick1991 ( talk • contribs) 16:04, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
Regarding the blocking related to Coanda-1910, I will present the public Mea Culpa, when you'll explain me the rule I did break. Thanks in advance, with my WP:AAGF on your side.-- Lsorin ( talk) 13:05, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Sir: You are wasting my time. I am editing something I've written on the talk page of attachment theory and I have already had to redo it twice. I'm at the community college and need to get home before midnight, so bug off. (that's American. do you read?) If you want to discuss it do it on the talk page. Margaret9mary ( talk) 01:44, 29 December 2010 (UTC) Margaret9mary ( talk) 01:48, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Article titled Nuqudy has been deleted by you on grounds of a lack of notability. How would you change the article? Khalil al-Rahman ( talk) 12:49, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Good evening, Slakr. Earlier today I created an entry into the Wikipedia. Grizzly_tobacco And for some reason, You have deleted it, I read what you had posted on the entry, And if I may, or if it is even possible, See the previous entry on the "Grizzly Tobacco" subject. Secondly, by what I read("(G4: Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grizzly tobacco)") Are you pointing towards, Because another person had created the page badly, It cannot be remade? My page was almost an exact copy of Copenhagen_(tobacco) Yes theirs is still open? What I am getting at is, What was wrong with it, And what would I need to fix.
-- OutlaW1211 ( talk) 12:45, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
hello there,
I wonder how not to accept Laptop for all initiative as an important subject and definition since it is very important to the Palestinian community. Such initiative is a nationwide one and could be replicated worldwide for the poor.
I kindly ask to re-upload the page, if you want , please advise of the changes you want me to make to make it live.
thank you in advance; — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bdmanager ( talk • contribs) 14:38, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
What the hell did my page do it was for information reason u asshole — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ichgo245 ( talk • contribs) 00:30, 30 December 2010
Please re-consider the deletion of bthebusinessnetwork www.bthebusinessnetwork.com. The website lowers production costs and fossil fuel consumption of the business that use it, because it is a free online office where people can send each other work files, work on them, and discuss them individually, or in groups at the same time, anywhere in the world. The website also provides people with links to all the government websites (state and federal) that allow them to create their own business and pay their taxes online. This website IS significant in the world of business and it should be recognized by Wikipedia.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitch39everts ( talk • contribs) 03:31, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi Slakr,
I recently put up the iClothing page which was deleted. I have since rewritten the page to more closely follow the wikipeda guidelines and would like to post my new content up. How do I go about doing this?
Afpdb10 ( talk) 06:58, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Hey, I was checkin out the bthebusinessnetwork.com site and i think you shouldn't delete the page that was made for it. it looks like a pretty good site and i think it could end up being a really big and impportant thing for businesses. you should actually make an account and check it out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neolava2191 ( talk • contribs) 07:33, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
I have read this site for hours and tried to comply with everything yet you deleted both my article and my talk page within minutes without even giving me a reply. I really feel I am wasting my time. How can I talk about a particular piece of software without you saying it is blatant advertising? There are tons of articles just the same as the one I submitted. Look here Game Engines. Am I not allowed to start with a "stub" at least? I can't finish one big article in just one day, just to have it deleted. I am really trying here but I think you're a little trigger happy with the Delete button. Some meaningful help would be appreciated. Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by GLGX ( talk • contribs) 12:10, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Do you mean to tell me that all the applications listed at Game Engines that are on Wikipedia have more notability? There are like a hundred of them. But none can say they support the Web3D open standards. I am trying to understand you but I still can't say that I do. I know you're busy and have little time for reply but so am I and I spent hours yesterday working on your site. Thanks, GLGX ( talk) 14:51, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I am new to Wikipedia, and would enjoy some help with the page of the Lieutenant Governor-elect of Guam. The USER: Scanlan, continues to input biased information, which is verifiable, but I believe to be defamatory, considering Ray Tenorio goes into office in a few days. My edit is Neutral, and does not put Ray Tenorio in such a horrible light. Please help with this.
-Jeff
User: Mrgates — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrgates ( talk • contribs) 06:02, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Dave ( talk) 07:25, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi Slakr. I noticed you changed the DYK rules change template. I'm not sure if you've been following the discussion at WT:DYK over the past couple of months, but reviewing another nomination is now one of the requirements along with the existing requirements regarding article length, creation date, etc., so the change you made was not quite accurate. Perhaps we can work out a phrasing that's less "demanding" while still being clear that the requirement exists? 28bytes ( talk) 04:46, 3 January 2011 (UTC)