Hi, the copyright to that image of Jagjit Singh is owned by me and my company (Heritage Arts and Events Ltd./HAE Live UK). So, please don't remove it. Thanks!
Do not use copyrighted images. 98.248.32.178 ( talk) 16:37, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Your recent addition has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For
legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing.
98.248.32.178 (
talk)
16:45, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Adding external links to an article or user page for the purpose of promoting a website or a product is not allowed, and is considered to be spam.
98.248.32.178 ( talk) 19:21, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without
citing a
reliable source, as you did with
this edit to
Family of Barack Obama, is not consistent with our policy of
verifiability. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article.
Diannaa (
Talk)
22:26, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without citing
verifiable and
reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial
edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Bush family
Jojhutton (
talk)
22:37, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Please do not
vandalize pages, as you did with
this edit to
Bush family. If you continue to do so, you will be
blocked from editing.
George2001hi
(Discussion)
22:54, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Jagjit Singh performing at Symphony Hall, Birmingham.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MGA73 ( talk) 21:35, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Please specify any work of him released in 1961 before making the changes in 'years active'. Otherwise DON'T change that part now. Wikiglobaleditor ( talk) 08:49, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Jagjit Singh by supporting
advertisements posts. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. -
Animeshkulkarni (
talk)
12:18, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Make useful changes to Wikipedia. If new, use your sandbox or ask for help from other experienced editors. - Animeshkulkarni ( talk) 12:44, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add
unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. and edit warring to keep it in the article will get you blocked also.
Elen of the Roads (
talk)
15:50, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Apart from the issues mentioned above, there are other problems with your editing of
Jagjit Singh. Some of your editing has added subjective opinion, rather than verifiable fact. For example, describing something as "a milestone joint session" is making a judgement as to its significance. It is at best questionable whether the links to www.eventspakistan.com are compliant with the guidelines on external links. Despite attempts by other editors to communicate with you, you seem to have made no attempt to discuss your edits, to explain why they are justified, or to work towards consensus. Your editing of the article constitutes an
edit war. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, under Wikipedia's policy on edit warring you should not edit war even if you believe you are right. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson ( talk) 16:04, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Elen of the Roads ( talk) 17:53, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
I have reverted your last edits as it was edit warring to add the same unsourced personal opinion as you have been warned about previously Elen of the Roads ( talk) 17:56, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Elen of the Roads (
talk)
16:11, 17 October 2011 (UTC)Straight back to it, re-adding unsourced information and advertising puff - and in one case adding information into a sourced sentence that is not supported by the source. This time you have been blocked for a week. I suggest you try learning from this experience, because the next block will be for a month, should you repeat the offence. Elen of the Roads ( talk) 16:13, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- Animeshkulkarni ( talk) 18:25, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello! If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.
This includes the article about
Jagjit Singh as you are representing his "Promotion Team".
-
Animeshkulkarni (
talk)
08:24, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Jagjit Singh shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Sitush ( talk) 12:13, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Please don't re-add that copyrighted photograph to the infobox until we can verify that you hold the copyright; to do that, you need to contact WP:OTRS. Even after you do that, though, the image currently in the lead is a better one. The lead image should be a clear shot of the person, ideally at a normal angle, and ideally showing the person's face clearly. The image currently in the infobox does that far better than the one you're trying to add. Please note that if you continue to try to "force" your picture into the infobox, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia temporarily for edit warring. Qwyrxian ( talk) 12:16, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
JamesBWatson (
talk)
13:51, 11 January 2012 (UTC)Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi, the copyright to that image of Jagjit Singh is owned by me and my company (Heritage Arts and Events Ltd./HAE Live UK). So, please don't remove it. Thanks!
Do not use copyrighted images. 98.248.32.178 ( talk) 16:37, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Your recent addition has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For
legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing.
98.248.32.178 (
talk)
16:45, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Adding external links to an article or user page for the purpose of promoting a website or a product is not allowed, and is considered to be spam.
98.248.32.178 ( talk) 19:21, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without
citing a
reliable source, as you did with
this edit to
Family of Barack Obama, is not consistent with our policy of
verifiability. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article.
Diannaa (
Talk)
22:26, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without citing
verifiable and
reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial
edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Bush family
Jojhutton (
talk)
22:37, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Please do not
vandalize pages, as you did with
this edit to
Bush family. If you continue to do so, you will be
blocked from editing.
George2001hi
(Discussion)
22:54, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Jagjit Singh performing at Symphony Hall, Birmingham.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MGA73 ( talk) 21:35, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Please specify any work of him released in 1961 before making the changes in 'years active'. Otherwise DON'T change that part now. Wikiglobaleditor ( talk) 08:49, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Jagjit Singh by supporting
advertisements posts. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. -
Animeshkulkarni (
talk)
12:18, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Make useful changes to Wikipedia. If new, use your sandbox or ask for help from other experienced editors. - Animeshkulkarni ( talk) 12:44, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add
unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. and edit warring to keep it in the article will get you blocked also.
Elen of the Roads (
talk)
15:50, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Apart from the issues mentioned above, there are other problems with your editing of
Jagjit Singh. Some of your editing has added subjective opinion, rather than verifiable fact. For example, describing something as "a milestone joint session" is making a judgement as to its significance. It is at best questionable whether the links to www.eventspakistan.com are compliant with the guidelines on external links. Despite attempts by other editors to communicate with you, you seem to have made no attempt to discuss your edits, to explain why they are justified, or to work towards consensus. Your editing of the article constitutes an
edit war. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, under Wikipedia's policy on edit warring you should not edit war even if you believe you are right. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson ( talk) 16:04, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Elen of the Roads ( talk) 17:53, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
I have reverted your last edits as it was edit warring to add the same unsourced personal opinion as you have been warned about previously Elen of the Roads ( talk) 17:56, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Elen of the Roads (
talk)
16:11, 17 October 2011 (UTC)Straight back to it, re-adding unsourced information and advertising puff - and in one case adding information into a sourced sentence that is not supported by the source. This time you have been blocked for a week. I suggest you try learning from this experience, because the next block will be for a month, should you repeat the offence. Elen of the Roads ( talk) 16:13, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- Animeshkulkarni ( talk) 18:25, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello! If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.
This includes the article about
Jagjit Singh as you are representing his "Promotion Team".
-
Animeshkulkarni (
talk)
08:24, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Jagjit Singh shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Sitush ( talk) 12:13, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Please don't re-add that copyrighted photograph to the infobox until we can verify that you hold the copyright; to do that, you need to contact WP:OTRS. Even after you do that, though, the image currently in the lead is a better one. The lead image should be a clear shot of the person, ideally at a normal angle, and ideally showing the person's face clearly. The image currently in the infobox does that far better than the one you're trying to add. Please note that if you continue to try to "force" your picture into the infobox, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia temporarily for edit warring. Qwyrxian ( talk) 12:16, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
JamesBWatson (
talk)
13:51, 11 January 2012 (UTC)Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)