|
Your recent editing history at Sikh shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's
talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents
consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant
noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary
page protection. You may still be blocked for
edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.
Saddhiyama (
talk)
13:04, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Saddhiyama, don't try to threaten me with barring, i don't care at all. The thing here is not whether i did 3 undos or not , the thing is whether those undos were right or not. Just prove me here, that those were wrong and then post something else on my user talk page. Untill then don't waste my time by posting crap things on my talk page
You have a new message at Talk:Sikh#Unexplained_deletions. --v/r - T P 14:08, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 17:19, 31 December 2011 (UTC) Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
User talk:Sitush with
this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Oxfordwang (
talk)
00:04, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did at
User talk:Sitush with
this edit. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you,
Oxfordwang (
talk)
00:13, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Sherepunjab. I've reverted your addition to the Prathiba Patel article. Please note that BLPs should be written responsibly, cautiously, and in a dispassionate tone, avoiding both understatement and overstatement. Negative information, in particular, should be presented very carefully and only if sources are of the highest quality. If some material is contentious or is challenged, you should discuss it on the talk page and get consensus before adding it to the article. Regards. -- regentspark ( comment) 00:31, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Qwyrxian (
talk)
03:03, 13 April 2012 (UTC)@Qwyrxian suck my dick
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Darkness Shines ( talk) 17:56, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Pakistan, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
SMS
Talk
17:58, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
User talk:Racerx11 with
this edit. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Excirial (
Contact me,
Contribs)
18:03, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents with
this edit, you may be
blocked from editing.
Excirial (
Contact me,
Contribs)
18:07, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|your reason here}}
below.
Excirial (
Contact me,
Contribs)
18:11, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
|
Your recent editing history at Sikh shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's
talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents
consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant
noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary
page protection. You may still be blocked for
edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.
Saddhiyama (
talk)
13:04, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Saddhiyama, don't try to threaten me with barring, i don't care at all. The thing here is not whether i did 3 undos or not , the thing is whether those undos were right or not. Just prove me here, that those were wrong and then post something else on my user talk page. Untill then don't waste my time by posting crap things on my talk page
You have a new message at Talk:Sikh#Unexplained_deletions. --v/r - T P 14:08, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 17:19, 31 December 2011 (UTC) Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
User talk:Sitush with
this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Oxfordwang (
talk)
00:04, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did at
User talk:Sitush with
this edit. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you,
Oxfordwang (
talk)
00:13, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Sherepunjab. I've reverted your addition to the Prathiba Patel article. Please note that BLPs should be written responsibly, cautiously, and in a dispassionate tone, avoiding both understatement and overstatement. Negative information, in particular, should be presented very carefully and only if sources are of the highest quality. If some material is contentious or is challenged, you should discuss it on the talk page and get consensus before adding it to the article. Regards. -- regentspark ( comment) 00:31, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Qwyrxian (
talk)
03:03, 13 April 2012 (UTC)@Qwyrxian suck my dick
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Darkness Shines ( talk) 17:56, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Pakistan, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
SMS
Talk
17:58, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
User talk:Racerx11 with
this edit. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Excirial (
Contact me,
Contribs)
18:03, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents with
this edit, you may be
blocked from editing.
Excirial (
Contact me,
Contribs)
18:07, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|your reason here}}
below.
Excirial (
Contact me,
Contribs)
18:11, 20 April 2012 (UTC)