This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 45 | ← | Archive 50 | Archive 51 | Archive 52 | Archive 53 | Archive 54 | Archive 55 |
Tripple-ddd ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Time: Feb 14, 2017 22:48:51
Message: Hi, I am thinking of making them the Standard Offer - may I have your views, please?
Notes:
-- UTRSBot ( talk) 22:48, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Hey Serge, I've been working recently to improve the page for Sonic '06. Could you help? I'm trying to get it to "good article" status, and I don't think I can on my own. ( TheJoebro64 ( talk) 23:52, 9 February 2017 (UTC))
now you get it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonicgalaxy27 ( talk • contribs) 06:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
I guess — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Sonicgalaxy27 (
talk •
contribs)
08:20, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
This is a notice that a discussion you participated in, either at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents or at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 February 8 has resulted in a Request for comment at Wikipedia talk:User categories#Request for Comment on the guidelines regarding "joke" categories. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 20:38, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Dynasty Warriors Gundam: Reborn is the 4th game in the Dynasty Warriors Gundam franchise, and the only us released DW and DWG game that doesn't have its own page.
I don't know how to code and make these pages, and am using my phone to boot.
But can I please get some help turning this from a redirect to the first games page the merely mentions it exists. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Dynasty_Warriors_Gundam_Reborn&redirect=no
and a second redirect that is what the page I tryed to make for it has been turned into that goes to a list of Dynasty Warriors spin offs, /info/en/?search=Dynasty_Warriors_Gundam_Reborn
To it's own page with as much respect as the other 3 games in it's franchise and the DW franchise it's spun from?
The only reason I'm even attemptin is because a few years ago before this games release it had a page, but since then has been reduced to a couple sentances on Dynasty Warriors: Gundams main page.
If I knew how to pull up the page from 4 years ago and reinstate it I would but all dynasty warriors gundam reborn redirect to that small section.
I asked for help, my query got removed. I've asked agin, no one seems to care so I'm just trying to get someone interested who knows what there doing. I've recently lost my job, and am moving, and have no working pc so my time and resources are limited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RoseEclipz ( talk • contribs) 20:53, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Are you able to do this? Remy Ma is popular right now due her releasing a diss track. The page looks like it's getting some vandalism.-- Jennica✿ / talk 20:24, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Do you wanna help me improve the Spit (album) article? I wanna make it good enough to be a good article or maybe even a featured article (which would be very hard). Statik N ( talk) 19:54, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
I'm Sorry i keep making 2017 FIFA Interactive World Cup but sometimes i get excited about this and want to have everything sorted and easier to look up and i make this page terrible. I wont make this page anymore.
And about the darts stuff i'm sorry but i like darts and i want to have everything easier to look up. I thought this was a good way to make that happen but apperently not. If you want me to make it different tell me. And if you want me to stop making this stuff tell me that too. Then i'll figure something out to have it sorted for me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garmt02 ( talk) 20:57, 28 February 2017 (UTC +1)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2017).
We may need to keep an eye on Home video game console I just reverted an edit made today by a user that was placing Nintendo Switch as part of the 9th generation. ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 08:57, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Was there really no article on Wikipedia about this game until now? GamerPro64 15:02, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
So I need somebody who can give these two (or maybe the same? the last editor has only worked on articles related to the game) users a warning, or perhaps lock the page long enough for me/you/somebody else to fix it without being reverted on sight. Notability at this point as been established, but the article is still a mess that doesn't follow general WP:MOS and WP:VG guidelines, and any attempt I make to fix that gets reverted for "trolling". ~ Dissident93 ( talk) 19:11, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Hey Serge, I've been trying to get Sonic the Hedgehog (1991 video game) to FA status recently. I need someone who's familiar with the page to give me suggestions for what needs to be improved; can you help? TheJoebro64 talk 12:10 PM, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
I just wanted to ask you if it'd be a good thing to merge Sonic Crackers into Knuckles' Chaotix. The Crackers page is extremely small and has only three reliable sources (Sega-16 is not a reliable source, and Nintendo Player appears to just be a fansite); it seems like it would be better to expand the "development" section on KC to include Crackers. TheJoebro64 talk 9:30 PM, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Hey there,
Sorry, but I need some help/advice from an admin on the Koei / Koei Tecmo pages (and you're the only one I remember, soz) While editing the date of Koei being disbanded, an IP user pointed out that Koei, the developer, simply renamed itself Koei Tecmo Games Co. Ltd., when absorbing Tecmo, rather than becoming a newly established company called Koei Tecmo. I checked this on Koei Tecmo Holding's company site, and yeah, Koei turned into KOEI TECMO GAMES CO., LTD, meaning some of the information is written wrongly on these pages, and that would have to be corrected, but I digress.
https://www.koeitecmo.co.jp/e/company/group/#koeitecmogames (or the legal document https://www.koeitecmo.co.jp/news/docs/news_20110207_01.pdf - It's using the Emperor Date System, so, 昭和53年)
But... here's the mess; Technically, this means
Koei Tecmo should be moved to Koei Tecmo Holdings Co., Ltd., and Koei should be moved to Koei Tecmo Games Co., Ltd., right? As a normal user, I can't do either, as people have already created redirect pages a long time ago. But this would also mean that most of the pages linking to Koei Tecmo right now, should actually direct to Koei Tecmo Games - which, as I said, is Koei right now.
And that's, well, that's a lot of pages. Not to mention, the Koei page would need to receive a major overhaul, since it wasn't updated to accommodate this.
Maybe I'm missing something. Do you have any advice or solutions on what to do here?
Sincerely, Kyoushu~ ►Talk Page 16:19, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi there!
You had left some very valuable feedback on my first wikipedia page. I have tried to incorporate yours suggestions as best as possible. Please do have a look to suggest if its okay. I am new to this, hence keen to learn and contribute. Also, I realise when I type Melissa Leach wikipedia in google search then only I see her page, I was wondering shouldnt the wikipedia page come on its own the moment I type her name? Let me know if I have got something wrong.
Thanks and cheers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hansdar ( talk • contribs) 20:33, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
I noticed you removed some empty entries, but not others. As it stands, "Shaddup You Face", Joe Dolce Music Theatre (1980); "Barbie Girl", Aqua (1997); "Faith", Limp Bizkit (1998); and "Stupid Hoe", Nicki Minaj (2011) are all entries with no text or references. If you are waiting for content/refs for these, ignore this message. Otherwise, could you please remove them? Thanks. 82.132.224.83 ( talk) 21:07, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi! Could you help me move JoJo no Kimyō na Bōken: Ōgon no Kaze (2002 video game) to GioGio's Bizarre Adventure? This game is consistently called JoJo's Bizarre Adventure (NA title) and GioGio's Bizarre Adventure (EU title) in English RSs (see refs in the article), and GioGio is the more preferable of the two due to the existence of JoJo's Bizarre Adventure (video game) and how it doesn't need a "(video game)" appended to the title.-- IDV talk 13:10, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Good afternoon, Serge. A question for you re: WP:DR since you have a lot more experience than me.
Another editor reverted every word of six paragraphs - fully cited -- that I had added to a short article about a lighthouse and refused to discuss it. i.e. Gave some vague reason when I asked but then refused to reply when I replied to that. So I started Mediation. (No edit warring ... my content is still not in the article since he had reverted it all.)
If the Mediator sides with him, or proposes a compromise, that's fine; I'll understand.
But what if he refuses Mediation as I suspect he will? I have read WP:DR and did not notice any option if that happens.
Is there some WP procedure in a situation of that type? Surely this type of situation is not uncommon. Thanks, Peter K Burian ( talk) 20:22, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Those would be the 3 avenues I'd take. Like I said, I believe I've been able to solve most disputes I've been in, or provided assistance from, with those three. There's also WP:30 (Third Opinion) where you could potentially get help. But I don't recall ever using that one - only hearing about it - so I can't attest to how to do it or how well it works.
Let me know if you have further questions, I'm happy to help. Sergecross73 msg me 20:44, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Well Serge, obviously I handled the situation badly. My fault. Not sure I have any useful recourse now. Thankfully, this is not an important article for me. It was just the principle of the situation. A good learning experience.
Reject. Fails to satisfy prerequisite to mediation #4, "The parties must have first engaged in extensive discussion of the matter in dispute at the article talk page and discussion only through edit summaries will not suffice". Once the conduct comments and allegations are taken out of the discussion, there is very little discussion about the content issues. It is, moreover, disturbing that the discussion began under a section entitled "Reverted all of my edits? Mediation to follow" (emphasis added). Dispute resolution is not to be used as a threat or as a substitute for adequately engaging in discussion on the article talk page and engaging in discussion in this manner evinces a profound misunderstanding of the purposes and abilities of dispute resolution at Wikipedia. Finally, if this request had not been rejected under prerequisite #4, it would almost certainly have been rejected under prerequisite #9. For the Mediation Committee
Peter K Burian ( talk) 22:09, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi there. Just wanted to let you know that a user by the name of NamcoKid43 created an unnecessary template called {{ Franchises by Taito Corporation}} despite being fully aware that all Taito franchises are stored under {{ Square Enix franchises}} I've provided a speedy deletion to the Franchises by Taito Corporation template, not only because it's a duplicate that came later than the Square Enix franchise template, but the fact that all the entries that are in the Taito Corporation, which are not in Square Enix franchise templates section of Taito are standalone games to begin with. Would you be able to keep an eye out on his activity, he also had a tendency to add standalone games to the {{ Bandai Namco franchises}} template too, and I'm concerned that he may unintentionally go into spam territory with activity like this. Regards. Iftekharahmed96 ( talk) 20:06, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
There is an ongoing discussion on whether infobox single and infobox song should be merged at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs. Your thoughts would be appreciated. Thank you. Erick ( talk) 14:19, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Good afternoon, Serge. An Admin question for you.
I know that this is the type of citation format that WP prefers:
"History" (PDF). Waterloo Historical Society 1930 Annual Meeting. Waterloo Historical Society. 1930. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
However, is this shorter format acceptable to WP? [1]
Would appreciate your comments. Cheers, Peter K Burian ( talk) 22:23, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
name and reuse existing references to avoid duplication, rather than specifying them multiple times. .... Yes, Serge, I should.... but in truth, I find that more time consuming than doing the templates. Isn't there some bot that will do so? Peter K Burian ( talk) 02:03, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello Sergecross73, I hope you don't mind but I was hoping to ask for your advice as I've seen you've been involved in other gaming/technology discussions. I have been trying to engage with an anomymous (IP) editor who is repeatedly making the same uncited edits on the Jaguar (microarchitecture) page. The editor has not engaged in the discussion on the talk page here and has become increasing hostile in the edit summaries. I am not sure how to deal with this without it degenerating into edit warring. I asked for help via Wikipedia:Requests for page protection but was declined as this is a 'content dispute', which may be true but if the editor will not engage and is increasingly attacking, I'm not sure what to do.
Any thoughts about what to do would be greatly appreciated. Dbsseven ( talk) 15:16, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Is GameCrate a reliable source? It's a site owned by Newegg. TheJoebro64 talk 09:28 PM, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
You might want to keep an eye on this user... I suspect it might be a sock of Sonicgalaxy27. This similarly-named account was created hours after he was blocked, and it re-introduced the same to Tails (character) that he did. It also made the same on Knuckles the Echidna. -- ThomasO1989 ( talk) 05:36, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Twilight hack. Since you had some involvement with the Twilight hack redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ppp ery 20:37, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 45 | ← | Archive 50 | Archive 51 | Archive 52 | Archive 53 | Archive 54 | Archive 55 |
Tripple-ddd ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Time: Feb 14, 2017 22:48:51
Message: Hi, I am thinking of making them the Standard Offer - may I have your views, please?
Notes:
-- UTRSBot ( talk) 22:48, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Hey Serge, I've been working recently to improve the page for Sonic '06. Could you help? I'm trying to get it to "good article" status, and I don't think I can on my own. ( TheJoebro64 ( talk) 23:52, 9 February 2017 (UTC))
now you get it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonicgalaxy27 ( talk • contribs) 06:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
I guess — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Sonicgalaxy27 (
talk •
contribs)
08:20, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
This is a notice that a discussion you participated in, either at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents or at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 February 8 has resulted in a Request for comment at Wikipedia talk:User categories#Request for Comment on the guidelines regarding "joke" categories. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 20:38, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Dynasty Warriors Gundam: Reborn is the 4th game in the Dynasty Warriors Gundam franchise, and the only us released DW and DWG game that doesn't have its own page.
I don't know how to code and make these pages, and am using my phone to boot.
But can I please get some help turning this from a redirect to the first games page the merely mentions it exists. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Dynasty_Warriors_Gundam_Reborn&redirect=no
and a second redirect that is what the page I tryed to make for it has been turned into that goes to a list of Dynasty Warriors spin offs, /info/en/?search=Dynasty_Warriors_Gundam_Reborn
To it's own page with as much respect as the other 3 games in it's franchise and the DW franchise it's spun from?
The only reason I'm even attemptin is because a few years ago before this games release it had a page, but since then has been reduced to a couple sentances on Dynasty Warriors: Gundams main page.
If I knew how to pull up the page from 4 years ago and reinstate it I would but all dynasty warriors gundam reborn redirect to that small section.
I asked for help, my query got removed. I've asked agin, no one seems to care so I'm just trying to get someone interested who knows what there doing. I've recently lost my job, and am moving, and have no working pc so my time and resources are limited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RoseEclipz ( talk • contribs) 20:53, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Are you able to do this? Remy Ma is popular right now due her releasing a diss track. The page looks like it's getting some vandalism.-- Jennica✿ / talk 20:24, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Do you wanna help me improve the Spit (album) article? I wanna make it good enough to be a good article or maybe even a featured article (which would be very hard). Statik N ( talk) 19:54, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
I'm Sorry i keep making 2017 FIFA Interactive World Cup but sometimes i get excited about this and want to have everything sorted and easier to look up and i make this page terrible. I wont make this page anymore.
And about the darts stuff i'm sorry but i like darts and i want to have everything easier to look up. I thought this was a good way to make that happen but apperently not. If you want me to make it different tell me. And if you want me to stop making this stuff tell me that too. Then i'll figure something out to have it sorted for me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garmt02 ( talk) 20:57, 28 February 2017 (UTC +1)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2017).
We may need to keep an eye on Home video game console I just reverted an edit made today by a user that was placing Nintendo Switch as part of the 9th generation. ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 08:57, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Was there really no article on Wikipedia about this game until now? GamerPro64 15:02, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
So I need somebody who can give these two (or maybe the same? the last editor has only worked on articles related to the game) users a warning, or perhaps lock the page long enough for me/you/somebody else to fix it without being reverted on sight. Notability at this point as been established, but the article is still a mess that doesn't follow general WP:MOS and WP:VG guidelines, and any attempt I make to fix that gets reverted for "trolling". ~ Dissident93 ( talk) 19:11, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Hey Serge, I've been trying to get Sonic the Hedgehog (1991 video game) to FA status recently. I need someone who's familiar with the page to give me suggestions for what needs to be improved; can you help? TheJoebro64 talk 12:10 PM, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
I just wanted to ask you if it'd be a good thing to merge Sonic Crackers into Knuckles' Chaotix. The Crackers page is extremely small and has only three reliable sources (Sega-16 is not a reliable source, and Nintendo Player appears to just be a fansite); it seems like it would be better to expand the "development" section on KC to include Crackers. TheJoebro64 talk 9:30 PM, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Hey there,
Sorry, but I need some help/advice from an admin on the Koei / Koei Tecmo pages (and you're the only one I remember, soz) While editing the date of Koei being disbanded, an IP user pointed out that Koei, the developer, simply renamed itself Koei Tecmo Games Co. Ltd., when absorbing Tecmo, rather than becoming a newly established company called Koei Tecmo. I checked this on Koei Tecmo Holding's company site, and yeah, Koei turned into KOEI TECMO GAMES CO., LTD, meaning some of the information is written wrongly on these pages, and that would have to be corrected, but I digress.
https://www.koeitecmo.co.jp/e/company/group/#koeitecmogames (or the legal document https://www.koeitecmo.co.jp/news/docs/news_20110207_01.pdf - It's using the Emperor Date System, so, 昭和53年)
But... here's the mess; Technically, this means
Koei Tecmo should be moved to Koei Tecmo Holdings Co., Ltd., and Koei should be moved to Koei Tecmo Games Co., Ltd., right? As a normal user, I can't do either, as people have already created redirect pages a long time ago. But this would also mean that most of the pages linking to Koei Tecmo right now, should actually direct to Koei Tecmo Games - which, as I said, is Koei right now.
And that's, well, that's a lot of pages. Not to mention, the Koei page would need to receive a major overhaul, since it wasn't updated to accommodate this.
Maybe I'm missing something. Do you have any advice or solutions on what to do here?
Sincerely, Kyoushu~ ►Talk Page 16:19, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi there!
You had left some very valuable feedback on my first wikipedia page. I have tried to incorporate yours suggestions as best as possible. Please do have a look to suggest if its okay. I am new to this, hence keen to learn and contribute. Also, I realise when I type Melissa Leach wikipedia in google search then only I see her page, I was wondering shouldnt the wikipedia page come on its own the moment I type her name? Let me know if I have got something wrong.
Thanks and cheers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hansdar ( talk • contribs) 20:33, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
I noticed you removed some empty entries, but not others. As it stands, "Shaddup You Face", Joe Dolce Music Theatre (1980); "Barbie Girl", Aqua (1997); "Faith", Limp Bizkit (1998); and "Stupid Hoe", Nicki Minaj (2011) are all entries with no text or references. If you are waiting for content/refs for these, ignore this message. Otherwise, could you please remove them? Thanks. 82.132.224.83 ( talk) 21:07, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi! Could you help me move JoJo no Kimyō na Bōken: Ōgon no Kaze (2002 video game) to GioGio's Bizarre Adventure? This game is consistently called JoJo's Bizarre Adventure (NA title) and GioGio's Bizarre Adventure (EU title) in English RSs (see refs in the article), and GioGio is the more preferable of the two due to the existence of JoJo's Bizarre Adventure (video game) and how it doesn't need a "(video game)" appended to the title.-- IDV talk 13:10, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Good afternoon, Serge. A question for you re: WP:DR since you have a lot more experience than me.
Another editor reverted every word of six paragraphs - fully cited -- that I had added to a short article about a lighthouse and refused to discuss it. i.e. Gave some vague reason when I asked but then refused to reply when I replied to that. So I started Mediation. (No edit warring ... my content is still not in the article since he had reverted it all.)
If the Mediator sides with him, or proposes a compromise, that's fine; I'll understand.
But what if he refuses Mediation as I suspect he will? I have read WP:DR and did not notice any option if that happens.
Is there some WP procedure in a situation of that type? Surely this type of situation is not uncommon. Thanks, Peter K Burian ( talk) 20:22, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Those would be the 3 avenues I'd take. Like I said, I believe I've been able to solve most disputes I've been in, or provided assistance from, with those three. There's also WP:30 (Third Opinion) where you could potentially get help. But I don't recall ever using that one - only hearing about it - so I can't attest to how to do it or how well it works.
Let me know if you have further questions, I'm happy to help. Sergecross73 msg me 20:44, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Well Serge, obviously I handled the situation badly. My fault. Not sure I have any useful recourse now. Thankfully, this is not an important article for me. It was just the principle of the situation. A good learning experience.
Reject. Fails to satisfy prerequisite to mediation #4, "The parties must have first engaged in extensive discussion of the matter in dispute at the article talk page and discussion only through edit summaries will not suffice". Once the conduct comments and allegations are taken out of the discussion, there is very little discussion about the content issues. It is, moreover, disturbing that the discussion began under a section entitled "Reverted all of my edits? Mediation to follow" (emphasis added). Dispute resolution is not to be used as a threat or as a substitute for adequately engaging in discussion on the article talk page and engaging in discussion in this manner evinces a profound misunderstanding of the purposes and abilities of dispute resolution at Wikipedia. Finally, if this request had not been rejected under prerequisite #4, it would almost certainly have been rejected under prerequisite #9. For the Mediation Committee
Peter K Burian ( talk) 22:09, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi there. Just wanted to let you know that a user by the name of NamcoKid43 created an unnecessary template called {{ Franchises by Taito Corporation}} despite being fully aware that all Taito franchises are stored under {{ Square Enix franchises}} I've provided a speedy deletion to the Franchises by Taito Corporation template, not only because it's a duplicate that came later than the Square Enix franchise template, but the fact that all the entries that are in the Taito Corporation, which are not in Square Enix franchise templates section of Taito are standalone games to begin with. Would you be able to keep an eye out on his activity, he also had a tendency to add standalone games to the {{ Bandai Namco franchises}} template too, and I'm concerned that he may unintentionally go into spam territory with activity like this. Regards. Iftekharahmed96 ( talk) 20:06, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
There is an ongoing discussion on whether infobox single and infobox song should be merged at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs. Your thoughts would be appreciated. Thank you. Erick ( talk) 14:19, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Good afternoon, Serge. An Admin question for you.
I know that this is the type of citation format that WP prefers:
"History" (PDF). Waterloo Historical Society 1930 Annual Meeting. Waterloo Historical Society. 1930. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
However, is this shorter format acceptable to WP? [1]
Would appreciate your comments. Cheers, Peter K Burian ( talk) 22:23, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
name and reuse existing references to avoid duplication, rather than specifying them multiple times. .... Yes, Serge, I should.... but in truth, I find that more time consuming than doing the templates. Isn't there some bot that will do so? Peter K Burian ( talk) 02:03, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello Sergecross73, I hope you don't mind but I was hoping to ask for your advice as I've seen you've been involved in other gaming/technology discussions. I have been trying to engage with an anomymous (IP) editor who is repeatedly making the same uncited edits on the Jaguar (microarchitecture) page. The editor has not engaged in the discussion on the talk page here and has become increasing hostile in the edit summaries. I am not sure how to deal with this without it degenerating into edit warring. I asked for help via Wikipedia:Requests for page protection but was declined as this is a 'content dispute', which may be true but if the editor will not engage and is increasingly attacking, I'm not sure what to do.
Any thoughts about what to do would be greatly appreciated. Dbsseven ( talk) 15:16, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Is GameCrate a reliable source? It's a site owned by Newegg. TheJoebro64 talk 09:28 PM, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
You might want to keep an eye on this user... I suspect it might be a sock of Sonicgalaxy27. This similarly-named account was created hours after he was blocked, and it re-introduced the same to Tails (character) that he did. It also made the same on Knuckles the Echidna. -- ThomasO1989 ( talk) 05:36, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Twilight hack. Since you had some involvement with the Twilight hack redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ppp ery 20:37, 22 March 2017 (UTC)