![]() This page is an archive of User Talk:Seresin (or perhaps something else). If you wish to discuss something here, feel free to bring it up again. The history for this page is here, not on the main talk page. Thanks. |
![]()
Until August 2007 —
September 2007 |
Thank you for your help. I was trying to explain the situation to that guy, but he did not want to hear me out. I don't know if you saw my message to him as I am still getting used to how this all works, but this is what I wrote to him. I only added the page because the Artistic Minds Society was listed in reference on the High IQ Societies article. In the article many of the societies listed had corresponding pages as well. This page does nor differ in any way from any of those, and if this one is deleted then those should as well. It makes no sense to allows all those societies to have articles but not this one.
There one nothing in this article touting it, making it sound better or special, or anything else that could be deemed as promotional. It is exactly along the lines of every other high iq society article included here.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmestre ( talk • contribs) 04:25, 1 March 2008 (UTC) Now Im confused. If my article was taken down for rule A7, and I created it because the society was referenced in the article 'High IQ Society', and many of the other societies mentioned have their own articles. Why exactly was mine deleted, and more importantly...why have those articles not been deleted?
Did you look at the article 'High IQ Society'? I think you should check it out, then you would understand why I am at a complete loss.The format of my article follows those of the societies with articles. I see that editors have seen those pages before, none were list for deletion. Plus I used their formats as the template for my article. Is there someone in charge I can take this up with. On top of all that, I just checked and you have tons of societies with articles. So far none have listed why they are significant. Most societies in general are of historical significance. Which is why this site has so many listed. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Rmestre (
talk •
contribs)
04:50, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi again Seresin. Sorry I couldn't answer your questions last night, it was nearly midnight when I'd returned from being out and I was too tired. Anyway, I see from your username history why you have a particular interest in this specialist area! You asked me "can non-crats mandate bureaucrats to act a certain way on specific requests?" I'd suggest that nobody can mandate anyone to anything in general. The community are 100% entitled to question and debate the way in which policies are derived and served so, as with most things, this would be a question of discussion and consensus. I'm not aware of a rename appeal process, I guess it would be handled on an ad-hoc basis on the WP:CHU talk page with a discussion initiated at a 'crat talk page.
As for withdrawing from a reconfirmation RfA, I'm inclined to say that re-sysoping would be out of the question. Should someone forgo their right to be re-sysoped without going through the process, thereby exposing themselves back to the scrutiny of the community, in my mind they have effectively forgone their right to be automatically re-sysoped. They should be advised that they need not go through the RfA process should they not be familiar with the ruling but if they insist on going ahead with it they should stand by the decision of the community. Again, I'm not convinced these scenarios are entirely covered by the rulings and I would discuss these with fellow 'crats but that's how I see things.
Thanks again for your ongoing interest and many questions! The Rambling Man ( talk) 09:34, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the smile! It made my day. It was good to see you around as well, having first met you during your Alcamae and "I" days at the ill-fated TV Review project. It's all cycling round there again, but I didn't have the patience to continue! Ref desk is much more fun. Gwinva ( talk) 01:00, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
...couldn't remember if these were yours or someone else's before this, if the latter, feel free to reward them as these are the sorta things we should be asking. Casliber ( talk · contribs) 08:16, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for asking those despite your support - I think it's very important that people make their decisions as informed as possible. I hope nothing in my answers makes you feel you should change your mind! ;) Feel free to ask anything else, if you need to. ~ Riana ⁂ 12:30, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
We are a state and federal contingency consisting of sheriffs, police, commissioners, wardens and jail administrators. We are relatively inexperienced at using Wikipedia and just reposted Corrections.com after we received feedback from JimBleak (wikipedia individual who deleted us last). He was very helpful at asking us to replace any subjective words with only factual and historical content. The new posting was based on the results from our last inter-agency meeting. We meet again for another inter-agency meeting in 5 days at the state house. Can you please provide us feedback on why we have been deleted so I may share with the group and make repairs. Thank you. March 2, 2008
cjneversleeps
Cjneversleeps (
talk)
20:26, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Please can you not delete my article Kebap 49 it is very important to me,and I want lots of people to find out about it!!!!!!!!! Mertozoro ( talk) 21:03, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. I have seen that you use huggle by the fact that you have automatically updated the huggle white list(it does this when closing huggle). I was wondering if you would add the category [[Category:Wikipedians who use Huggle]] to your user page so that it fills out and we know who actually uses huggle. If you do not want to you do not have to. I am also sorry if i have already talked to you about this or you no longer use huggle but i sent it to everyone that has edited the page since mid January. I hope we can start to fill out this category. If you would like to reply to this message then please reply on my talk page as i will probably not check here again. Thanks. ·Add§hore· Talk/ Cont 18:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
File:David,larry.JPG | My RFA | |
Thank you muchly for your support in
my recent request for adminship, which was successfully closed on 76%, finishing at 73 supports, 23 opposes and 1 neutral. The supports were wonderful, and I will keep in mind the points made in the useful opposes and try to suppress the Larry David in me! Now I'm off to issue some cool down blocks, just to get my money's worth!
Kidding btw. All the best, Deacon of Pndapetzim ( Talk) 11:45, 5 March 2008 (UTC) |
Thanks for reverting the article. I've been swamped with everything in life lately. If you reverted the article, that means it isn't online, right? Because I don't want another admin to nominate it for speedy deletion before I'm done with it. (Nothing against the admins, you people are great and I have so much respect for you). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bboy14 ( talk • contribs) 18:22, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi. The user who posted this incomprehensible little tome was responsible for several similar items. Most were copyvios, all but this one were deleted. I'd like to go ahead and restore the speedy and leave word on the talk page as to why. Thanks. -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 05:47, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Guess the rules have changed. Thanks for the update. With the copyright paranoia that's permeated this site lately, I have a feeling that whoever decides on its fate will likely err on the side of caution and send it packing. Again, thanks for updating me. Much obliged. :) -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 06:00, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Just so you know, you were right. I am watching the King Dedede page. You'll see many "anonymous users" editing it. However, it will just be me (mostly). -- 68.214.113.147 ( talk) 00:13, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Oh, and you probably won't see me "fixing" the Meta Knight article much. I just felt "generous" today. Well, I have to get ready to go to Gamestop to get Brawl. Goodbye, new "friend." -- 68.214.113.147 ( talk) 00:42, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Oh wiki your so fine your so fine you blow my mind (
talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thanks for taking the time to leave a comment on my page.
Hi there, I am "Oh wiki your so fine" under a new name. Thanks so much for explaining everything to me.
Adrian Fletcher (
talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thank you for the direction. I shared your feedback with the rest of the committee and we will begin the process of gathering articles that "give significant, non-trivial coverage and discussion of our site." Yes, we would find it very helpful if you could restore the article to a subpage until we are better prepared to move it back to the mainspace. Where would be access that? Thank you again for all your help. On behalf of the corrections community it is sincerely appreciated. Cjneversleeps ( talk) 17:13, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
One more question - our committee was using the following page as our format model -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Correctional_Association. After reading your feedback I am thinking their article may not be the proper one for us to follow? Are they considered different from us because they are a trade association in corrections? Would it be too much trouble to direct us to a better one to follow? Maybe something for an online community that hits the mark. Many thanks! Cjneversleeps ( talk) 17:34, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
See this. Will ( talk) 21:27, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
I see that you have proposed The Millionaires for deletion. I wonder if you could take a look at the other pages from EmmaButton and 58.166.109.89. My suspicion is that this user is a sockpuppet of Nede, for the reasons I outlined on Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/EmmaButton. The links on The Millionaires to Antoinette Moliterno and Eden Montana-Caceda, which have been repeatedly created by Nede sockpuppets, makes this seem quite likely. Ttwaring ( talk) 00:31, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for this note, I lose track of which ones are automagically notable. I've taken it to AfD :) TRAVELLINGCARI My story Tell me yours 03:59, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Just in need of some coffee or sleep, or fresh air, depending on the time of day where you are. -- Zsero ( talk) 02:31, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
I'm glad that your Google search found some stuff about 101 People Who Are Really Screwing America and that you've deprodded it. I'm not going to take it to AfD; I view it as a stub to be improved. Could you please add some evidence of notability to the article? Thanks, CWC 03:41, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
With the case closed, and posts such as this, I expect a lot of stuff to pop-up on my watchlist; I have better than three thousand items watched and a huge number are tv stuff. I do not want to get into a pattern of edit warring, but I will be one of those who will be very aware of resurrected articles. Appropriate response from the admin-class will be needed if this re-ignites. Cheers, Jack Merridew 08:22, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
...Take a look at King Dedede and Meta Knight. -- 72.155.80.144 ( talk) 20:25, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi, in your comment you said "I'm pretty sure it won't" -- presumably meaning that typing in a lowercase version of a name won't work in the Go box.
Simple exercise: try typing in
adam sandler
or
Adam sandler
...and you'll see that in both cases you go directly to the Adam Sandler page, even though no explicit redirect is present. (I originally tried "richard nixon" as my example, and found there was another bogus redirect defined.)
I've requested similar speedies for useless redirects before, and they've gone through. I think removing the spitzer (and nixon) links are similar cases to what I've requested in the past. Regards, -- NapoliRoma ( talk) 23:29, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for moving our page to a 'work area'. We're working on notability. We really appreciate the time and feedback you have given us. Cjneversleeps ( talk) 09:58, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
Dear Seresin, thank you for taking part in
my RfB. As you may know, it was
not passed by bureaucrats. |
No concensus to redirect. The closing admin's comments are quite clear:
A proposal was made to merge into a new article. No mention of a redirect to He-Man and the Masters of the Universe was ever made. PC78 ( talk) 01:08, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Sorry to bother you again. We just received a 'nominate to delete' notice on the subpage you created for us. See, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cjneversleeps/Corrections.com. What should we do? Many thanks in advance. Cjneversleeps ( talk) 16:18, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Seresin! Thank-you for your
support in my RfA (91/1/1).
|
You deleted the Frederic H Dustin article even though there were more keep votes and there was a concensus from even those that originally voted for deletion that the article had merit. As I pointed out in my keep vote, this is a case of systemic bias where if he had spent his accomplishments happened in a US state, there would have been no question about notability. *You* thought it was non-notable; fine, that's your right to have an opinion but you overturned the concensus that formed by nearly all those who voted that the man is of note but the article needed work. So how do we appeal and reverse a deletion that did not reflect the beliefs of those who voted in the article for deletion?-- 72.1.222.140 ( talk) 17:32, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of PAGE_NAME. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 72.1.222.140 ( talk) 18:16, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
== AFD ==th, 2008
Thanks for closing the AFD on Matthew Kozioł but you forgot to actually delete the article :) Reggie Perrin ( talk) 23:54, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You close the AfD with the result keep, possibly based on the majority of votes. However, if you read the discussion you can see that the institute in question does not meet WP:ORG and the article should be deleted, even if some voters think it should be kept (most of them are pushing a political agenda). Is there a way to nominate the article for deletion a second time? Thanks, -- Gabi S. ( talk) 07:34, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
you choose to delete "Sunset of my Sunrise" stating it to did not indicate Importance/Notability. However based on the Criteria for Notability, more specifically, #12: Has been the subject of a half hour or longer broadcast across a national radio or TV network, and in fact as the article in question stated, they were subject of an Hour long radio broadcast on March 8, 2008
Eh... there's a few reasons why I'm not restricting it. First, categories and portals do still provide some encyclopedic content, so I don't see much need to exclude those. Secondly, anyone with 1,500 edits is likely to be editing a lot more than just those anyway. Finally, MediaWiki is open to admins only, and there's no way anyone is passing an RfA with only 1,500 edits - in practice, less than 5,000.
As for the sentence, thanks. I've fixed it.
Hersfold (
t/
a/
c)
01:48, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
This vandal has been mass-reverting me for three days;
If it's not User:Grawp, it's a copy-cat, one of my impersonators or User:Jon Hobynx
Care to review and block;
See also; User talk:Sandstein#anon harassing my edits
Cheers, Jack Merridew 06:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
I dunno...I think you could do with a new signature, personally. I'm starting to ask myself who you used to be, because I can't remember. Sad on my part, I guess. dihydrogen monoxide ( H2O) 09:24, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
|
I'd like a subpage for Goal Line blitz —Preceding unsigned comment added by Justafish2002 ( talk • contribs) 15:22, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi, the template you added says "result2=KeepTe". I'm assuming the "Te" is a typo, right? I'd not 100% sure or I'd just correct it myself. TJRC ( talk) 05:26, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your changes on this article. I'm so used to going in and finding what amounts to vandalism that I was pleasantly surprised to find intelligent design. Wildhartlivie ( talk) 07:37, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
so nice to see u working amazingly well ,saw some of ur decisions in some AFD decisions so just wanted to make a let u know . best wishes . regards Pearll's sun ( talk) 14:10, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you!
Thank you for your support in my RFA. The final vote count was (73/3/1), so I am now an administrator. Please let me know if at any stage you need help, or if you have comments on how I am doing as an admin. Have a nice day! :) Aleta Sing 17:03, 22 March 2008 (UTC) |
We use edit summaries to communicate. E_dog95' Hi ' 18:46, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
I've removed the image per your comment on my talk page. It wa placed there by King Vegita. SynergeticMaggot ( talk) 23:12, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
How can i help on Ursup requests and name changes? -- Cream ( talk) 02:55, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Absolutely. Thanks for the warning, beforehand.
I've finished cleaning this up now if you still want to AFD it. I found that Feta cheese didn't belong in the list and can testify to its accuracy now. Colonel Warden ( talk) 22:42, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Monty Python - might like to hear from you - cheers Satu Suro 23:03, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
-- Bobet 18:13, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Can you please see my response to your oppose here? Thanks, - Milk's Favorite Cookie 01:43, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() This page is an archive of User Talk:Seresin (or perhaps something else). If you wish to discuss something here, feel free to bring it up again. The history for this page is here, not on the main talk page. Thanks. |
![]()
Until August 2007 —
September 2007 |
Thank you for your help. I was trying to explain the situation to that guy, but he did not want to hear me out. I don't know if you saw my message to him as I am still getting used to how this all works, but this is what I wrote to him. I only added the page because the Artistic Minds Society was listed in reference on the High IQ Societies article. In the article many of the societies listed had corresponding pages as well. This page does nor differ in any way from any of those, and if this one is deleted then those should as well. It makes no sense to allows all those societies to have articles but not this one.
There one nothing in this article touting it, making it sound better or special, or anything else that could be deemed as promotional. It is exactly along the lines of every other high iq society article included here.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmestre ( talk • contribs) 04:25, 1 March 2008 (UTC) Now Im confused. If my article was taken down for rule A7, and I created it because the society was referenced in the article 'High IQ Society', and many of the other societies mentioned have their own articles. Why exactly was mine deleted, and more importantly...why have those articles not been deleted?
Did you look at the article 'High IQ Society'? I think you should check it out, then you would understand why I am at a complete loss.The format of my article follows those of the societies with articles. I see that editors have seen those pages before, none were list for deletion. Plus I used their formats as the template for my article. Is there someone in charge I can take this up with. On top of all that, I just checked and you have tons of societies with articles. So far none have listed why they are significant. Most societies in general are of historical significance. Which is why this site has so many listed. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Rmestre (
talk •
contribs)
04:50, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi again Seresin. Sorry I couldn't answer your questions last night, it was nearly midnight when I'd returned from being out and I was too tired. Anyway, I see from your username history why you have a particular interest in this specialist area! You asked me "can non-crats mandate bureaucrats to act a certain way on specific requests?" I'd suggest that nobody can mandate anyone to anything in general. The community are 100% entitled to question and debate the way in which policies are derived and served so, as with most things, this would be a question of discussion and consensus. I'm not aware of a rename appeal process, I guess it would be handled on an ad-hoc basis on the WP:CHU talk page with a discussion initiated at a 'crat talk page.
As for withdrawing from a reconfirmation RfA, I'm inclined to say that re-sysoping would be out of the question. Should someone forgo their right to be re-sysoped without going through the process, thereby exposing themselves back to the scrutiny of the community, in my mind they have effectively forgone their right to be automatically re-sysoped. They should be advised that they need not go through the RfA process should they not be familiar with the ruling but if they insist on going ahead with it they should stand by the decision of the community. Again, I'm not convinced these scenarios are entirely covered by the rulings and I would discuss these with fellow 'crats but that's how I see things.
Thanks again for your ongoing interest and many questions! The Rambling Man ( talk) 09:34, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the smile! It made my day. It was good to see you around as well, having first met you during your Alcamae and "I" days at the ill-fated TV Review project. It's all cycling round there again, but I didn't have the patience to continue! Ref desk is much more fun. Gwinva ( talk) 01:00, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
...couldn't remember if these were yours or someone else's before this, if the latter, feel free to reward them as these are the sorta things we should be asking. Casliber ( talk · contribs) 08:16, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for asking those despite your support - I think it's very important that people make their decisions as informed as possible. I hope nothing in my answers makes you feel you should change your mind! ;) Feel free to ask anything else, if you need to. ~ Riana ⁂ 12:30, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
We are a state and federal contingency consisting of sheriffs, police, commissioners, wardens and jail administrators. We are relatively inexperienced at using Wikipedia and just reposted Corrections.com after we received feedback from JimBleak (wikipedia individual who deleted us last). He was very helpful at asking us to replace any subjective words with only factual and historical content. The new posting was based on the results from our last inter-agency meeting. We meet again for another inter-agency meeting in 5 days at the state house. Can you please provide us feedback on why we have been deleted so I may share with the group and make repairs. Thank you. March 2, 2008
cjneversleeps
Cjneversleeps (
talk)
20:26, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Please can you not delete my article Kebap 49 it is very important to me,and I want lots of people to find out about it!!!!!!!!! Mertozoro ( talk) 21:03, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. I have seen that you use huggle by the fact that you have automatically updated the huggle white list(it does this when closing huggle). I was wondering if you would add the category [[Category:Wikipedians who use Huggle]] to your user page so that it fills out and we know who actually uses huggle. If you do not want to you do not have to. I am also sorry if i have already talked to you about this or you no longer use huggle but i sent it to everyone that has edited the page since mid January. I hope we can start to fill out this category. If you would like to reply to this message then please reply on my talk page as i will probably not check here again. Thanks. ·Add§hore· Talk/ Cont 18:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
File:David,larry.JPG | My RFA | |
Thank you muchly for your support in
my recent request for adminship, which was successfully closed on 76%, finishing at 73 supports, 23 opposes and 1 neutral. The supports were wonderful, and I will keep in mind the points made in the useful opposes and try to suppress the Larry David in me! Now I'm off to issue some cool down blocks, just to get my money's worth!
Kidding btw. All the best, Deacon of Pndapetzim ( Talk) 11:45, 5 March 2008 (UTC) |
Thanks for reverting the article. I've been swamped with everything in life lately. If you reverted the article, that means it isn't online, right? Because I don't want another admin to nominate it for speedy deletion before I'm done with it. (Nothing against the admins, you people are great and I have so much respect for you). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bboy14 ( talk • contribs) 18:22, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi. The user who posted this incomprehensible little tome was responsible for several similar items. Most were copyvios, all but this one were deleted. I'd like to go ahead and restore the speedy and leave word on the talk page as to why. Thanks. -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 05:47, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Guess the rules have changed. Thanks for the update. With the copyright paranoia that's permeated this site lately, I have a feeling that whoever decides on its fate will likely err on the side of caution and send it packing. Again, thanks for updating me. Much obliged. :) -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 06:00, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Just so you know, you were right. I am watching the King Dedede page. You'll see many "anonymous users" editing it. However, it will just be me (mostly). -- 68.214.113.147 ( talk) 00:13, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Oh, and you probably won't see me "fixing" the Meta Knight article much. I just felt "generous" today. Well, I have to get ready to go to Gamestop to get Brawl. Goodbye, new "friend." -- 68.214.113.147 ( talk) 00:42, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Oh wiki your so fine your so fine you blow my mind (
talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thanks for taking the time to leave a comment on my page.
Hi there, I am "Oh wiki your so fine" under a new name. Thanks so much for explaining everything to me.
Adrian Fletcher (
talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thank you for the direction. I shared your feedback with the rest of the committee and we will begin the process of gathering articles that "give significant, non-trivial coverage and discussion of our site." Yes, we would find it very helpful if you could restore the article to a subpage until we are better prepared to move it back to the mainspace. Where would be access that? Thank you again for all your help. On behalf of the corrections community it is sincerely appreciated. Cjneversleeps ( talk) 17:13, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
One more question - our committee was using the following page as our format model -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Correctional_Association. After reading your feedback I am thinking their article may not be the proper one for us to follow? Are they considered different from us because they are a trade association in corrections? Would it be too much trouble to direct us to a better one to follow? Maybe something for an online community that hits the mark. Many thanks! Cjneversleeps ( talk) 17:34, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
See this. Will ( talk) 21:27, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
I see that you have proposed The Millionaires for deletion. I wonder if you could take a look at the other pages from EmmaButton and 58.166.109.89. My suspicion is that this user is a sockpuppet of Nede, for the reasons I outlined on Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/EmmaButton. The links on The Millionaires to Antoinette Moliterno and Eden Montana-Caceda, which have been repeatedly created by Nede sockpuppets, makes this seem quite likely. Ttwaring ( talk) 00:31, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for this note, I lose track of which ones are automagically notable. I've taken it to AfD :) TRAVELLINGCARI My story Tell me yours 03:59, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Just in need of some coffee or sleep, or fresh air, depending on the time of day where you are. -- Zsero ( talk) 02:31, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
I'm glad that your Google search found some stuff about 101 People Who Are Really Screwing America and that you've deprodded it. I'm not going to take it to AfD; I view it as a stub to be improved. Could you please add some evidence of notability to the article? Thanks, CWC 03:41, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
With the case closed, and posts such as this, I expect a lot of stuff to pop-up on my watchlist; I have better than three thousand items watched and a huge number are tv stuff. I do not want to get into a pattern of edit warring, but I will be one of those who will be very aware of resurrected articles. Appropriate response from the admin-class will be needed if this re-ignites. Cheers, Jack Merridew 08:22, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
...Take a look at King Dedede and Meta Knight. -- 72.155.80.144 ( talk) 20:25, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi, in your comment you said "I'm pretty sure it won't" -- presumably meaning that typing in a lowercase version of a name won't work in the Go box.
Simple exercise: try typing in
adam sandler
or
Adam sandler
...and you'll see that in both cases you go directly to the Adam Sandler page, even though no explicit redirect is present. (I originally tried "richard nixon" as my example, and found there was another bogus redirect defined.)
I've requested similar speedies for useless redirects before, and they've gone through. I think removing the spitzer (and nixon) links are similar cases to what I've requested in the past. Regards, -- NapoliRoma ( talk) 23:29, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for moving our page to a 'work area'. We're working on notability. We really appreciate the time and feedback you have given us. Cjneversleeps ( talk) 09:58, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
Dear Seresin, thank you for taking part in
my RfB. As you may know, it was
not passed by bureaucrats. |
No concensus to redirect. The closing admin's comments are quite clear:
A proposal was made to merge into a new article. No mention of a redirect to He-Man and the Masters of the Universe was ever made. PC78 ( talk) 01:08, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Sorry to bother you again. We just received a 'nominate to delete' notice on the subpage you created for us. See, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cjneversleeps/Corrections.com. What should we do? Many thanks in advance. Cjneversleeps ( talk) 16:18, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Seresin! Thank-you for your
support in my RfA (91/1/1).
|
You deleted the Frederic H Dustin article even though there were more keep votes and there was a concensus from even those that originally voted for deletion that the article had merit. As I pointed out in my keep vote, this is a case of systemic bias where if he had spent his accomplishments happened in a US state, there would have been no question about notability. *You* thought it was non-notable; fine, that's your right to have an opinion but you overturned the concensus that formed by nearly all those who voted that the man is of note but the article needed work. So how do we appeal and reverse a deletion that did not reflect the beliefs of those who voted in the article for deletion?-- 72.1.222.140 ( talk) 17:32, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of PAGE_NAME. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 72.1.222.140 ( talk) 18:16, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
== AFD ==th, 2008
Thanks for closing the AFD on Matthew Kozioł but you forgot to actually delete the article :) Reggie Perrin ( talk) 23:54, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You close the AfD with the result keep, possibly based on the majority of votes. However, if you read the discussion you can see that the institute in question does not meet WP:ORG and the article should be deleted, even if some voters think it should be kept (most of them are pushing a political agenda). Is there a way to nominate the article for deletion a second time? Thanks, -- Gabi S. ( talk) 07:34, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
you choose to delete "Sunset of my Sunrise" stating it to did not indicate Importance/Notability. However based on the Criteria for Notability, more specifically, #12: Has been the subject of a half hour or longer broadcast across a national radio or TV network, and in fact as the article in question stated, they were subject of an Hour long radio broadcast on March 8, 2008
Eh... there's a few reasons why I'm not restricting it. First, categories and portals do still provide some encyclopedic content, so I don't see much need to exclude those. Secondly, anyone with 1,500 edits is likely to be editing a lot more than just those anyway. Finally, MediaWiki is open to admins only, and there's no way anyone is passing an RfA with only 1,500 edits - in practice, less than 5,000.
As for the sentence, thanks. I've fixed it.
Hersfold (
t/
a/
c)
01:48, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
This vandal has been mass-reverting me for three days;
If it's not User:Grawp, it's a copy-cat, one of my impersonators or User:Jon Hobynx
Care to review and block;
See also; User talk:Sandstein#anon harassing my edits
Cheers, Jack Merridew 06:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
I dunno...I think you could do with a new signature, personally. I'm starting to ask myself who you used to be, because I can't remember. Sad on my part, I guess. dihydrogen monoxide ( H2O) 09:24, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
|
I'd like a subpage for Goal Line blitz —Preceding unsigned comment added by Justafish2002 ( talk • contribs) 15:22, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi, the template you added says "result2=KeepTe". I'm assuming the "Te" is a typo, right? I'd not 100% sure or I'd just correct it myself. TJRC ( talk) 05:26, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your changes on this article. I'm so used to going in and finding what amounts to vandalism that I was pleasantly surprised to find intelligent design. Wildhartlivie ( talk) 07:37, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
so nice to see u working amazingly well ,saw some of ur decisions in some AFD decisions so just wanted to make a let u know . best wishes . regards Pearll's sun ( talk) 14:10, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you!
Thank you for your support in my RFA. The final vote count was (73/3/1), so I am now an administrator. Please let me know if at any stage you need help, or if you have comments on how I am doing as an admin. Have a nice day! :) Aleta Sing 17:03, 22 March 2008 (UTC) |
We use edit summaries to communicate. E_dog95' Hi ' 18:46, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
I've removed the image per your comment on my talk page. It wa placed there by King Vegita. SynergeticMaggot ( talk) 23:12, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
How can i help on Ursup requests and name changes? -- Cream ( talk) 02:55, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Absolutely. Thanks for the warning, beforehand.
I've finished cleaning this up now if you still want to AFD it. I found that Feta cheese didn't belong in the list and can testify to its accuracy now. Colonel Warden ( talk) 22:42, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Monty Python - might like to hear from you - cheers Satu Suro 23:03, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
-- Bobet 18:13, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Can you please see my response to your oppose here? Thanks, - Milk's Favorite Cookie 01:43, 26 March 2008 (UTC)