![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 3 | 17 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 00:59, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey Sephiroth... BCR, saw the message you left me and I'm "writing" back to ya, cause I'm very much interested in getting an admin coach, and if you're still offering, I'd like to accept your offer, if... you know... the offer is still there. You don't say? Your were Gary's mentor? Very nice to meet ya and I would like to say that me and Gary are homies. ;) Well, I see in his page that he does not want to be an Admin., I respect that, but I think he would be a phenomenal one. :P I wouldn't want to "push him" over the "limit". If that slot is open, count me in, if its open. Peace, -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 04:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey, if you have some time, can you take a look at Dream Focus ( talk · contribs) actions of late regarding the Gantz equipment list, Card Clow AfD, etc. It seems pretty disruptive to me, but may just be because he's starting to get on my nerves. He's dismissing all consensus discussions as not being consensus because they don't have "enough" participants, no matter how many are there, and implied that I was "vote staking" discussions because only "my friends" participate. Also, to me this seems like canvassing by attempting to claim that his list is the "same" and that if one is deleted then the other will be to. [1] I removed it as canvassing, but he has restored it (twice) [2]-- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 04:31, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Sorry to have to bother about this again, but DF is again making personal remarks and falsifying statements made in a conversation on my talk page in an AfD [3] the coming to a Wikiquette alert filed on my behalf (unasked, I might note) and made more ther. [4] -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 13:53, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
*sigh* [5] [6] he apparently is now determined to make his own additions anywhere and everywhere to make false statements and be harassing and contrib stalking (which at this point, seems to be his only purpose). -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 02:16, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
*scream* I'd saw its obvious he's following me around at this point. [7] [8] He has absolutely nothing to do with local articles like this, and seems to be deliberately looking for reasons to oppose me anywhere he thinks he can. -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 05:33, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for replying to some of the other editors at Talk:Stargate SG-1 and being so calm about it. I noticed that I was giving too much of a WP:FUCK and needed some time off (which presented itself by visiting a friend over the weekend), and I think I have mostly regained my cool and my old wiki-perspective now. I just want to say that I really appreciate that I wasn't left alone to fight all the bad faith targeted at me (this is new for me). – sgeureka t• c 18:42, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey, just wanted to pop a note to see where the merge of List of Naruto antagonists to List of Naruto characters is at? I see the discussion on the main list talk page seemed to have consensus in October. (curiosity mostly roused because someone is arguing that because Naruto has two, so should their favorite series).-- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 14:31, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 4 | 24 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Delivered at 05:02, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot ( Disable)
I am considering nominating Naruto Uzumaki for GA status. Comparing it to the GAs Sasuke Uchiha, Sakura Haruno, Kakashi Hatake, Orochimaru (Naruto), Shikamaru Nara, Rock Lee, and Gaara, I believe it is ready. What are your thoughts on a possible nomination? Scapler ( talk) 16:42, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
As you may have noticed, it was nominated for removal 15 days after promotion. I don't know what your policy is for such circumstances, but could you please leave it open for now? I do want to try to address this user's concerns. Thanks, Scorpion 0422 21:31, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Personal_attacks Gimmetrow 17:02, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Don't know if you are aware of this, but I left a couple comments after my support that still stand unaddressed. Dabomb87 ( talk) 22:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Are there any other recognizable symbols of the franchise? I can use the flame from the logo, but without the red element it's not very distinctive. I might try just a "B" done up a similar way. -- Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk) 22:09, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey, can you delete Category:Wikipedia featured topics Nobel Laureates and its subcategories? They're no longer needed. Thanks, rst20xx ( talk) 18:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 5 | 31 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 22:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Gatoclass 01:48, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
The January 2009 issue of the WikiProject Films newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you and happy editing! -- Nehrams2020 ( talk) 20:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video games Newsletter | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
You referenced my position during your comment at WT:Notability (fiction). This is to inform you that due to revisions of the guideline, I have had to switch my position from support to strong oppose.— Kww( talk) 16:58, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I am reviewing your article, Jutsu (Naruto), for GA and have started my comments at Talk:Jutsu (Naruto)/GA1. I like the article and find it interesting, but I am concerned, first, with one fundamental issue. I am worried that this article is too much a series of embedded lists rather than an articles. Could you consider and discuss this issue with me? Regards, — Mattisse ( Talk) 03:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Please look at what is going on now. here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#Collectonian_and_Farix_refuse_to_honor_the_Merge_consensus_on_AFD I have two editors following me around accusing me of forum shopping, among other things, which make no sense at all. Both of them refuse to honor an AFD consensus. I mention it now, since whenever there is a problem, she post here, and you end up on my talk page discussing whatever she told you. Also as an administrator, perhaps you can tell me if they are breaking some rules. Dream Focus ( talk) 15:06, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Modelled after List of Naruto characters, I created two test articles: User:JSH-alive/Sandbox/WC characters for Winx Club, and User:JSH-alive/Sandbox/TS! characters for Totally Spies.
I need your help, or at least your comment for those articles. Also, What can be done for Code Lyoko ( 1, 2, 3), Atomic Betty, The Powerpuff Girls, PPGZ ( 1, 2), Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends, Ed, Edd n Eddy, Codename: Kids Next Door ( 1, 2, 3, 4) and Ben 10 ( 1, 2) ? -- JSH-alive talk • cont • mail 13:40, 8 February 2009 (UTC) And Huntik? -- JSH-alive talk • cont • mail 07:54, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi Sephiroth BCR, it's now been over half a year since my previous request for the mop, and reviewing that RfA reveals that you were one of my opposers last time round. I was wondering if you'd like to comment on my current status in the Wikipedia community, and if you believe I would be ready to run for adminship again in future? Please respond wherever you feel it is most appropriate. Kind regards. — Cyclonenim ( talk · contribs · email) 16:24, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Featured topics/Castlevania: Aria of Sorrow is now missing an image :/ rst20xx ( talk) 19:16, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 6 | 8 February 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 22:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Check this. Your comment would help. Tintor2 ( talk) 16:59, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Dear Sephiroth BCR, what should we do with the FLRC of List of Nobel Peace Prize laureates. We have to fix some rationales on List of Nobel Peace Prize laureates, but we can fix them. Should we close the FLRC? Have a nice day. :-) AdjustShift ( talk) 17:05, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
I've gone through and pared down almost all of the individual sections at List of Tokyo Mew Mew characters except the Ichigo section and the Saint Rose Crusaders. For the rest, do you think they are better or do they still need work? G.A.S wondered if there was still too much plot retelling/repetition? -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 03:09, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
I share your frustration with A Nobody -- his comments become Le Grande-er every day, and I take some solace in these otherwise uncertain times in seeing him revert to predictable type. But, I think it might be better not to respond to his asinine baiting and trolling. None of us is going to make headway with him -- and, fortunately (and as you've pointed out), he's not making headway with anyone else. Save your bandwidth for his next barrage of ARS spam. -- EEMIV ( talk) 17:21, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey Sephiroth, I'm wondering if you'd be willing to do a history merge of List of Shaman King chapters and User:Dinoguy1000/List of Shaman King chapters. It doesn't matter which gets deleted for the merge. Thanks in advance! 「 ダイノ ガイ 千?!」(Dinoguy1000) 19:42, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
User_talk:Gary_King#Re:admin Gary King ( talk) 21:17, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 07:40, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() | Sabre ( talk) 20:51, 18 February 2009 (UTC) |
Hey Sephiroth, could you delete Template:Infobox animanga/Dorama? It was moved to {{ Infobox animanga/Drama}} in 2006, and it looks like it wasn't used much before then - nothing transcludes it now, at any rate. Also, could you take a look at Template:Infobox animanga/Novel/Light? I'm not so sure it can be deleted, since it sounds like it was merged to {{ Infobox animanga/Novel}}, but I don't know enough about the history. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千?!」(Dinoguy1000) 20:11, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello, hope you're doing well. A reviewer at the FLC for Arnold Schwarzenegger filmography requested that somebody perform a copyedit of the lead of the list. Looking at your extensive contributions to FLs, I was wondering if you could take a look? If you can't, no worries. Thanks and happy editing! -- Nehrams2020 ( talk) 09:57, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
i really believe that it should be said that Sen to Chihiro is a foreign language film that won an oscar. Regardless of whether the Academy used an english dubbed version to send to voters, the film itself is still originally in japanese, and the award belongs to the japanese creative team that made the film, not the english voice cast. The page i tried to edit was simply about foreign language films that had won oscars not counting the best foreign language film. I think this film fits that category, and is pertinent information as this is the only non-american, non-english film so far to fin that oscar, and as of 2002 the first japanese film to win an oscar since 1955. The page itself was not about what the academy "thought" they were voting on, but on film history itself. I think this film deserves to be on that same list.
i understand i might be arguing a non-important issue. If needed why not let me update the page with a note that the academy used an english dubbed version, though the film itself is originally japanese? thanks for listening Tsuchinoko33 ( talk) 11:58, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Tsuchinoko33
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:
The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 21:52, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Congratulations for the Bleach seasons FT, good work! By the way I wanted to know why does the main episode list uses the a logo image; the first dvd used in season 1 already has the logo, so it could be used also in the main list, couldnt it be? Regards. Tintor2 ( talk) 15:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
This discussion is due to close in a few days, and it could do with someone neutral to close it and draw some sort of conclusion. As the only project coordinator not to comment in the discussion, and being an admin of sound mind, do you think you would be able to do it? :) Thanks in advance either way! PC78 ( talk) 18:15, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
The February 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Happy editing! -- Nehrams2020 ( talk) 00:23, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 08:40, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
A while back on my talk page, you expressed an interest in this article. We've finished building the content up as far as we know how, and are looking for some guidance as to the next steps, possibly looking towards FAC. Would you be willing to drop by the article talk page and comment? — Quasirandom ( talk) 22:32, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video games Newsletter | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
There seems to be some progress being made towards redrafting the guideline. Most of the arguments for a permissive guideline seem to have been countered in the sense that they have been found not to be viable. My attempts to obtain a compromise earlier this year seem to be leading towards a slightly stricter applciation of WP:V for fiction that should discourage topics which are only the subject of in universe plot summary, trivia and cruft. A recent post at WT:FICT#The rules seems to make this clear. Can you provide some cool and clear support towards drafting a compromise that is compliant with existing Wikipedia policies and guidelines? -- Gavin Collins ( talk) 19:31, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry to bother you, but there is a discussion going on at Talk:List of D.Gray-man characters regarding the cast of English language anime adaption and whether they should be added to the article. Your comments would appreciated. ~ Itzjustdrama C ? 23:51, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
SDF-1 Macross has been nominated for deletion and you were involved in
a previous AfD about a different article involving the same cartoon series. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SDF-1 Macross. Thank you.--
Sloane (
talk)
00:37, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
I've got no problem letting it go. I was done arguing anyway and was just going to request third-party mediation from WP:MEDCAB, but I guess that is no longer necessary. If the problem arises again in the future, that's the first thing I'll do. Thanks. Khalfani Khaldun 07:53, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Is it possible to speedy delist FLs? List of European Union member states by accession is now a redirect. Dabomb87 ( talk) 22:33, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 00:45, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I'm looking for an admin coach, saw you listed, and wondered if you could help me? Thanks for your time, -- Chzz ► 01:07, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm asking for you advice cause i see that you seem to have tried some mediation between these two editors. Again it has arrived at a wikiquette alerts with both editors throwing bad faith accusations back and forth. Neither seem that interested in the advice given or accepting that this behaviour is unproductive which is about the limit of what can be done at WQA. Can you suggest anything? take it to ANI, mediation? A topic ban? A ban on interaction? I suggested that they both draw a line under the past and assmue good faith in future but i'm not convinced it will be effective. Thanks in advance. --neon white talk 06:08, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
I know you said you didn't want to hear from either of us, but this is ridiculous. I can not be expected to ignore any anime/manga AfDs just because Dream Focus commented on them first. Nor did I appear "straight" after him. 4-5 HOURS difference on one, 30 minutes on the other, and HE has no history of editing either either. And no mention of the opposite happening at both Lucifer and the Biscuit Hammer and its AfD, nor his immediately removing a CSD tag I put on an article [14] nor his popping into a discussion at the South Park episode page [15] only after I did (and continuing his "merge doesn't mean merge" arguments. Despite my questioning Neon white's neutrality at this point, I have tried very hard not to respond to Dream Focus' continuing personal attacks at the AfDs mentioned, in the TWO 3RR reports against Dream Focus at the moment, and here in which he continues perpetuating the false statements that I was the first and only editor to remove a rescue tag from an article, when I was neither the first NOR the last, yet Neon white actually told Dream Focus that he should have reported all THREE editors to AN/I instead of edit warring with us. [16] I don't really see how Neon white can claim to want to resolve the situation while appearing to be throwing even more fuel on the fire.-- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 20:20, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
"I have never tagged anything with the Rescue squadron tag before. I don't recall ever using any tag previously for anything. She on the other hand has a terrible habit of going around to articles that were voted keep, and erasing them anyway, calling it a Merge. Look through her history, and you can see she has done that quite regularly. You have an editor who refuses to follow closing AFD consensus, and is obsessed with deleting every single article she can get away with. Is there a way to search for how many articles she has added a redirect to, after they were voted Keep? Dream Focus 21:57, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Have you had the opportunity to review the restrictions that I linked to for Sephiroth BCR? Do you think that this might provide a basis for you and Collectonian to move forward in the editing of the encyclopedia, once the current matter is resolved? Cheers, LessHeard vanU ( talk) 22:03, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Please look at the edit history of that article. Remember, read from the bottom, it coming first. http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Misa_Kobayashi&action=history
Just read through that please. She appeared to believe only administrators could delete those tags, despite the fact it says if anyone disagrees with the speedy delete, they should remove it. Prods and speedy delete are just if no one would possibly object to the deletion of an article. Otherwise, you send it to AFD and discuss it, forming a consensus.
And if I delete her CSD tag right away, its because I had added that page to my watchlist after removing the prod placed by someone else. And I removed the speedy delete tag, for the same reason.
I would like others to read her comments there in the edit summaries, as well as on the AFD page as well, and comment. Did I do anything wrong? What about her adding the speedy delete tag back after I removed it? Isn't that rather uncalled for? I only mention the event at all, since it was brought up in the discussion above. I thought it just a common mistake, although a strange one, since the tag clearly states that anyone can remove it if they disagree, not just an administrator.
Notice that she appears to believe that everyone is out to get her. Do I appear in even 1% of the articles she is involved in? She edits a tremendous number of articles every day it seems. I'm certainly not stalking her, if we both show up in the anime/manga discussion, or something else we both signed up for on our watch list. Her constant behavior to ignore anything that the AFD voted keep, and then erase it when no one is looking, replacing it with a redirect, and calling it a "merge" despite nothing being merged, is a source of conflict. This is how this all got started again, she doing that to an article I had on my watchlist, and then in her edit comment calling me a "stalker" once again for it. I am certainly not stalking her. Dream Focus 01:42, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
My problems are with her constant accusations, none of which make any sense. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#Collectonian.27s_behavior
Every chance she gets, she accuses me of going after her because she nominated one of my articles for deletion, the Gantz Equipment page. You can see on my user page that that only happened, after I criticized her actions elsewhere, and then told her not to erase a message on a talk page, because she didn't like what it said. She then nominated my article for deletion. I had problems with her in the past. Does anyone who has seen the facts, believe her constant accusation that I'm simply out to get her because she deleted one article of mine? She makes false accusations to try to sway others to her side.
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia%3AWikiquette_alerts&diff=276813655&oldid=276812516 She accuses me of forum shopping, on a recent history of quatrains page, despite the fact I only posted on the wikiquette, and then was told where to post instead, and then posted a second time at that location. Does anyone consider that forum shopping? And that article was kept, as consensus, after enough attention was brought to the fact that a few were determined to delete it, and put just a redirect in its place.
Those who have looked through the issue, please answer my questions.
Dream Focus 05:10, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Sephiroth. I conducted an image review at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of United States Naval Academy alumni, but the nominator has said that I was over the top, and too strict and nitpicky. I've asked Ecobbola, who is more experienced in image reviewing to comment, and I was wondering if you, as a non-image reviewer would be able to visit and comment also. Was I too strict? Does correct license tagging on Commons matter for article purposes, or should it be kept a separate thing?
I know an image needs a FUR if it is not GFDL or Creative Commons licensed or in the public domain, but when an image is said to be in the public domain, does that need to be verified or can it be assumed by, for example, the age or career of the subject in the photo?
This was my first image review, so if I was wrong, I'd like to know for future purposes. Regards, Matthewedwards ( talk • contribs • email) 00:47, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi Sephiroth, just wanted to pop by and say nice job with the List of Nobel laureates affiliated with King's College London :) Flaming Ferrari ( talk) 06:20, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 23:52, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Hey I hear you Sephiroth BCR, I just want to win this thing. I'll stop being innappropriate. Shamwow86 ( talk) 22:28, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 3 | 17 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 00:59, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey Sephiroth... BCR, saw the message you left me and I'm "writing" back to ya, cause I'm very much interested in getting an admin coach, and if you're still offering, I'd like to accept your offer, if... you know... the offer is still there. You don't say? Your were Gary's mentor? Very nice to meet ya and I would like to say that me and Gary are homies. ;) Well, I see in his page that he does not want to be an Admin., I respect that, but I think he would be a phenomenal one. :P I wouldn't want to "push him" over the "limit". If that slot is open, count me in, if its open. Peace, -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 04:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey, if you have some time, can you take a look at Dream Focus ( talk · contribs) actions of late regarding the Gantz equipment list, Card Clow AfD, etc. It seems pretty disruptive to me, but may just be because he's starting to get on my nerves. He's dismissing all consensus discussions as not being consensus because they don't have "enough" participants, no matter how many are there, and implied that I was "vote staking" discussions because only "my friends" participate. Also, to me this seems like canvassing by attempting to claim that his list is the "same" and that if one is deleted then the other will be to. [1] I removed it as canvassing, but he has restored it (twice) [2]-- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 04:31, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Sorry to have to bother about this again, but DF is again making personal remarks and falsifying statements made in a conversation on my talk page in an AfD [3] the coming to a Wikiquette alert filed on my behalf (unasked, I might note) and made more ther. [4] -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 13:53, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
*sigh* [5] [6] he apparently is now determined to make his own additions anywhere and everywhere to make false statements and be harassing and contrib stalking (which at this point, seems to be his only purpose). -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 02:16, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
*scream* I'd saw its obvious he's following me around at this point. [7] [8] He has absolutely nothing to do with local articles like this, and seems to be deliberately looking for reasons to oppose me anywhere he thinks he can. -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 05:33, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for replying to some of the other editors at Talk:Stargate SG-1 and being so calm about it. I noticed that I was giving too much of a WP:FUCK and needed some time off (which presented itself by visiting a friend over the weekend), and I think I have mostly regained my cool and my old wiki-perspective now. I just want to say that I really appreciate that I wasn't left alone to fight all the bad faith targeted at me (this is new for me). – sgeureka t• c 18:42, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey, just wanted to pop a note to see where the merge of List of Naruto antagonists to List of Naruto characters is at? I see the discussion on the main list talk page seemed to have consensus in October. (curiosity mostly roused because someone is arguing that because Naruto has two, so should their favorite series).-- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 14:31, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 4 | 24 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Delivered at 05:02, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot ( Disable)
I am considering nominating Naruto Uzumaki for GA status. Comparing it to the GAs Sasuke Uchiha, Sakura Haruno, Kakashi Hatake, Orochimaru (Naruto), Shikamaru Nara, Rock Lee, and Gaara, I believe it is ready. What are your thoughts on a possible nomination? Scapler ( talk) 16:42, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
As you may have noticed, it was nominated for removal 15 days after promotion. I don't know what your policy is for such circumstances, but could you please leave it open for now? I do want to try to address this user's concerns. Thanks, Scorpion 0422 21:31, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Personal_attacks Gimmetrow 17:02, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Don't know if you are aware of this, but I left a couple comments after my support that still stand unaddressed. Dabomb87 ( talk) 22:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Are there any other recognizable symbols of the franchise? I can use the flame from the logo, but without the red element it's not very distinctive. I might try just a "B" done up a similar way. -- Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk) 22:09, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey, can you delete Category:Wikipedia featured topics Nobel Laureates and its subcategories? They're no longer needed. Thanks, rst20xx ( talk) 18:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 5 | 31 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 22:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Gatoclass 01:48, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
The January 2009 issue of the WikiProject Films newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you and happy editing! -- Nehrams2020 ( talk) 20:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video games Newsletter | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
You referenced my position during your comment at WT:Notability (fiction). This is to inform you that due to revisions of the guideline, I have had to switch my position from support to strong oppose.— Kww( talk) 16:58, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I am reviewing your article, Jutsu (Naruto), for GA and have started my comments at Talk:Jutsu (Naruto)/GA1. I like the article and find it interesting, but I am concerned, first, with one fundamental issue. I am worried that this article is too much a series of embedded lists rather than an articles. Could you consider and discuss this issue with me? Regards, — Mattisse ( Talk) 03:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Please look at what is going on now. here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#Collectonian_and_Farix_refuse_to_honor_the_Merge_consensus_on_AFD I have two editors following me around accusing me of forum shopping, among other things, which make no sense at all. Both of them refuse to honor an AFD consensus. I mention it now, since whenever there is a problem, she post here, and you end up on my talk page discussing whatever she told you. Also as an administrator, perhaps you can tell me if they are breaking some rules. Dream Focus ( talk) 15:06, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Modelled after List of Naruto characters, I created two test articles: User:JSH-alive/Sandbox/WC characters for Winx Club, and User:JSH-alive/Sandbox/TS! characters for Totally Spies.
I need your help, or at least your comment for those articles. Also, What can be done for Code Lyoko ( 1, 2, 3), Atomic Betty, The Powerpuff Girls, PPGZ ( 1, 2), Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends, Ed, Edd n Eddy, Codename: Kids Next Door ( 1, 2, 3, 4) and Ben 10 ( 1, 2) ? -- JSH-alive talk • cont • mail 13:40, 8 February 2009 (UTC) And Huntik? -- JSH-alive talk • cont • mail 07:54, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi Sephiroth BCR, it's now been over half a year since my previous request for the mop, and reviewing that RfA reveals that you were one of my opposers last time round. I was wondering if you'd like to comment on my current status in the Wikipedia community, and if you believe I would be ready to run for adminship again in future? Please respond wherever you feel it is most appropriate. Kind regards. — Cyclonenim ( talk · contribs · email) 16:24, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Featured topics/Castlevania: Aria of Sorrow is now missing an image :/ rst20xx ( talk) 19:16, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 6 | 8 February 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 22:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Check this. Your comment would help. Tintor2 ( talk) 16:59, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Dear Sephiroth BCR, what should we do with the FLRC of List of Nobel Peace Prize laureates. We have to fix some rationales on List of Nobel Peace Prize laureates, but we can fix them. Should we close the FLRC? Have a nice day. :-) AdjustShift ( talk) 17:05, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
I've gone through and pared down almost all of the individual sections at List of Tokyo Mew Mew characters except the Ichigo section and the Saint Rose Crusaders. For the rest, do you think they are better or do they still need work? G.A.S wondered if there was still too much plot retelling/repetition? -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 03:09, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
I share your frustration with A Nobody -- his comments become Le Grande-er every day, and I take some solace in these otherwise uncertain times in seeing him revert to predictable type. But, I think it might be better not to respond to his asinine baiting and trolling. None of us is going to make headway with him -- and, fortunately (and as you've pointed out), he's not making headway with anyone else. Save your bandwidth for his next barrage of ARS spam. -- EEMIV ( talk) 17:21, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey Sephiroth, I'm wondering if you'd be willing to do a history merge of List of Shaman King chapters and User:Dinoguy1000/List of Shaman King chapters. It doesn't matter which gets deleted for the merge. Thanks in advance! 「 ダイノ ガイ 千?!」(Dinoguy1000) 19:42, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
User_talk:Gary_King#Re:admin Gary King ( talk) 21:17, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 07:40, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() | Sabre ( talk) 20:51, 18 February 2009 (UTC) |
Hey Sephiroth, could you delete Template:Infobox animanga/Dorama? It was moved to {{ Infobox animanga/Drama}} in 2006, and it looks like it wasn't used much before then - nothing transcludes it now, at any rate. Also, could you take a look at Template:Infobox animanga/Novel/Light? I'm not so sure it can be deleted, since it sounds like it was merged to {{ Infobox animanga/Novel}}, but I don't know enough about the history. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千?!」(Dinoguy1000) 20:11, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello, hope you're doing well. A reviewer at the FLC for Arnold Schwarzenegger filmography requested that somebody perform a copyedit of the lead of the list. Looking at your extensive contributions to FLs, I was wondering if you could take a look? If you can't, no worries. Thanks and happy editing! -- Nehrams2020 ( talk) 09:57, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
i really believe that it should be said that Sen to Chihiro is a foreign language film that won an oscar. Regardless of whether the Academy used an english dubbed version to send to voters, the film itself is still originally in japanese, and the award belongs to the japanese creative team that made the film, not the english voice cast. The page i tried to edit was simply about foreign language films that had won oscars not counting the best foreign language film. I think this film fits that category, and is pertinent information as this is the only non-american, non-english film so far to fin that oscar, and as of 2002 the first japanese film to win an oscar since 1955. The page itself was not about what the academy "thought" they were voting on, but on film history itself. I think this film deserves to be on that same list.
i understand i might be arguing a non-important issue. If needed why not let me update the page with a note that the academy used an english dubbed version, though the film itself is originally japanese? thanks for listening Tsuchinoko33 ( talk) 11:58, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Tsuchinoko33
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:
The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 21:52, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Congratulations for the Bleach seasons FT, good work! By the way I wanted to know why does the main episode list uses the a logo image; the first dvd used in season 1 already has the logo, so it could be used also in the main list, couldnt it be? Regards. Tintor2 ( talk) 15:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
This discussion is due to close in a few days, and it could do with someone neutral to close it and draw some sort of conclusion. As the only project coordinator not to comment in the discussion, and being an admin of sound mind, do you think you would be able to do it? :) Thanks in advance either way! PC78 ( talk) 18:15, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
The February 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Happy editing! -- Nehrams2020 ( talk) 00:23, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 08:40, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
A while back on my talk page, you expressed an interest in this article. We've finished building the content up as far as we know how, and are looking for some guidance as to the next steps, possibly looking towards FAC. Would you be willing to drop by the article talk page and comment? — Quasirandom ( talk) 22:32, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video games Newsletter | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
There seems to be some progress being made towards redrafting the guideline. Most of the arguments for a permissive guideline seem to have been countered in the sense that they have been found not to be viable. My attempts to obtain a compromise earlier this year seem to be leading towards a slightly stricter applciation of WP:V for fiction that should discourage topics which are only the subject of in universe plot summary, trivia and cruft. A recent post at WT:FICT#The rules seems to make this clear. Can you provide some cool and clear support towards drafting a compromise that is compliant with existing Wikipedia policies and guidelines? -- Gavin Collins ( talk) 19:31, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry to bother you, but there is a discussion going on at Talk:List of D.Gray-man characters regarding the cast of English language anime adaption and whether they should be added to the article. Your comments would appreciated. ~ Itzjustdrama C ? 23:51, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
SDF-1 Macross has been nominated for deletion and you were involved in
a previous AfD about a different article involving the same cartoon series. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SDF-1 Macross. Thank you.--
Sloane (
talk)
00:37, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
I've got no problem letting it go. I was done arguing anyway and was just going to request third-party mediation from WP:MEDCAB, but I guess that is no longer necessary. If the problem arises again in the future, that's the first thing I'll do. Thanks. Khalfani Khaldun 07:53, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Is it possible to speedy delist FLs? List of European Union member states by accession is now a redirect. Dabomb87 ( talk) 22:33, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 00:45, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I'm looking for an admin coach, saw you listed, and wondered if you could help me? Thanks for your time, -- Chzz ► 01:07, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm asking for you advice cause i see that you seem to have tried some mediation between these two editors. Again it has arrived at a wikiquette alerts with both editors throwing bad faith accusations back and forth. Neither seem that interested in the advice given or accepting that this behaviour is unproductive which is about the limit of what can be done at WQA. Can you suggest anything? take it to ANI, mediation? A topic ban? A ban on interaction? I suggested that they both draw a line under the past and assmue good faith in future but i'm not convinced it will be effective. Thanks in advance. --neon white talk 06:08, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
I know you said you didn't want to hear from either of us, but this is ridiculous. I can not be expected to ignore any anime/manga AfDs just because Dream Focus commented on them first. Nor did I appear "straight" after him. 4-5 HOURS difference on one, 30 minutes on the other, and HE has no history of editing either either. And no mention of the opposite happening at both Lucifer and the Biscuit Hammer and its AfD, nor his immediately removing a CSD tag I put on an article [14] nor his popping into a discussion at the South Park episode page [15] only after I did (and continuing his "merge doesn't mean merge" arguments. Despite my questioning Neon white's neutrality at this point, I have tried very hard not to respond to Dream Focus' continuing personal attacks at the AfDs mentioned, in the TWO 3RR reports against Dream Focus at the moment, and here in which he continues perpetuating the false statements that I was the first and only editor to remove a rescue tag from an article, when I was neither the first NOR the last, yet Neon white actually told Dream Focus that he should have reported all THREE editors to AN/I instead of edit warring with us. [16] I don't really see how Neon white can claim to want to resolve the situation while appearing to be throwing even more fuel on the fire.-- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 20:20, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
"I have never tagged anything with the Rescue squadron tag before. I don't recall ever using any tag previously for anything. She on the other hand has a terrible habit of going around to articles that were voted keep, and erasing them anyway, calling it a Merge. Look through her history, and you can see she has done that quite regularly. You have an editor who refuses to follow closing AFD consensus, and is obsessed with deleting every single article she can get away with. Is there a way to search for how many articles she has added a redirect to, after they were voted Keep? Dream Focus 21:57, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Have you had the opportunity to review the restrictions that I linked to for Sephiroth BCR? Do you think that this might provide a basis for you and Collectonian to move forward in the editing of the encyclopedia, once the current matter is resolved? Cheers, LessHeard vanU ( talk) 22:03, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Please look at the edit history of that article. Remember, read from the bottom, it coming first. http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Misa_Kobayashi&action=history
Just read through that please. She appeared to believe only administrators could delete those tags, despite the fact it says if anyone disagrees with the speedy delete, they should remove it. Prods and speedy delete are just if no one would possibly object to the deletion of an article. Otherwise, you send it to AFD and discuss it, forming a consensus.
And if I delete her CSD tag right away, its because I had added that page to my watchlist after removing the prod placed by someone else. And I removed the speedy delete tag, for the same reason.
I would like others to read her comments there in the edit summaries, as well as on the AFD page as well, and comment. Did I do anything wrong? What about her adding the speedy delete tag back after I removed it? Isn't that rather uncalled for? I only mention the event at all, since it was brought up in the discussion above. I thought it just a common mistake, although a strange one, since the tag clearly states that anyone can remove it if they disagree, not just an administrator.
Notice that she appears to believe that everyone is out to get her. Do I appear in even 1% of the articles she is involved in? She edits a tremendous number of articles every day it seems. I'm certainly not stalking her, if we both show up in the anime/manga discussion, or something else we both signed up for on our watch list. Her constant behavior to ignore anything that the AFD voted keep, and then erase it when no one is looking, replacing it with a redirect, and calling it a "merge" despite nothing being merged, is a source of conflict. This is how this all got started again, she doing that to an article I had on my watchlist, and then in her edit comment calling me a "stalker" once again for it. I am certainly not stalking her. Dream Focus 01:42, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
My problems are with her constant accusations, none of which make any sense. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#Collectonian.27s_behavior
Every chance she gets, she accuses me of going after her because she nominated one of my articles for deletion, the Gantz Equipment page. You can see on my user page that that only happened, after I criticized her actions elsewhere, and then told her not to erase a message on a talk page, because she didn't like what it said. She then nominated my article for deletion. I had problems with her in the past. Does anyone who has seen the facts, believe her constant accusation that I'm simply out to get her because she deleted one article of mine? She makes false accusations to try to sway others to her side.
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia%3AWikiquette_alerts&diff=276813655&oldid=276812516 She accuses me of forum shopping, on a recent history of quatrains page, despite the fact I only posted on the wikiquette, and then was told where to post instead, and then posted a second time at that location. Does anyone consider that forum shopping? And that article was kept, as consensus, after enough attention was brought to the fact that a few were determined to delete it, and put just a redirect in its place.
Those who have looked through the issue, please answer my questions.
Dream Focus 05:10, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Sephiroth. I conducted an image review at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of United States Naval Academy alumni, but the nominator has said that I was over the top, and too strict and nitpicky. I've asked Ecobbola, who is more experienced in image reviewing to comment, and I was wondering if you, as a non-image reviewer would be able to visit and comment also. Was I too strict? Does correct license tagging on Commons matter for article purposes, or should it be kept a separate thing?
I know an image needs a FUR if it is not GFDL or Creative Commons licensed or in the public domain, but when an image is said to be in the public domain, does that need to be verified or can it be assumed by, for example, the age or career of the subject in the photo?
This was my first image review, so if I was wrong, I'd like to know for future purposes. Regards, Matthewedwards ( talk • contribs • email) 00:47, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi Sephiroth, just wanted to pop by and say nice job with the List of Nobel laureates affiliated with King's College London :) Flaming Ferrari ( talk) 06:20, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 23:52, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Hey I hear you Sephiroth BCR, I just want to win this thing. I'll stop being innappropriate. Shamwow86 ( talk) 22:28, 17 March 2009 (UTC)