Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living persons. Thank you.--
John (
talk)
08:38, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
who are you
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an
edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at
David Ross (businessman). Although repeatedly
reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 19:34, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
You are free to remove posts that have not been replied to. Please do not remove posts that have replies as that renders the replies meaningless. -- NeilN talk to me 20:16, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Please do not
delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at
Talk:David Ross (businessman). Such edits are disruptive and appear to be
vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. The comments you removed were not yours, unless you are admitting to
sockpuppetry. --
Orduin ⋠
T⋡
20:23, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
I will stop posting on articles as I do not understand what is going on other than that I am being bullied off Wikipedia Goodbye ( Saskia2309 ( talk) 20:33, 7 January 2015 (UTC))
I have mentioned you at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Andcarr. You may wish to comment there. - Sitush ( talk) 02:21, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
I do not know how to do that, however I note that you are more concerned about my IP address than the content of my posts. When I prove you are being misleading you run to the administrators. That really is shameful. ( Saskia2309 ( talk) 02:32, 8 January 2015 (UTC))
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living persons. Thank you.--
John (
talk)
08:38, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
who are you
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an
edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at
David Ross (businessman). Although repeatedly
reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 19:34, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
You are free to remove posts that have not been replied to. Please do not remove posts that have replies as that renders the replies meaningless. -- NeilN talk to me 20:16, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Please do not
delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at
Talk:David Ross (businessman). Such edits are disruptive and appear to be
vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. The comments you removed were not yours, unless you are admitting to
sockpuppetry. --
Orduin ⋠
T⋡
20:23, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
I will stop posting on articles as I do not understand what is going on other than that I am being bullied off Wikipedia Goodbye ( Saskia2309 ( talk) 20:33, 7 January 2015 (UTC))
I have mentioned you at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Andcarr. You may wish to comment there. - Sitush ( talk) 02:21, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
I do not know how to do that, however I note that you are more concerned about my IP address than the content of my posts. When I prove you are being misleading you run to the administrators. That really is shameful. ( Saskia2309 ( talk) 02:32, 8 January 2015 (UTC))