Cleanup on August 7, 2017. Start new discussions under the line.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to
assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Edits with which you do not agree are not disruptive unless specifically designed to disrupt the article. Like you did with incorrect and excessive labeling of perfectly reasonable edits as vandalism, you have abused Wikipedia policies and expectations in order to intimidate other editors by describing perfectly reasonable edits as disruptive. It is clear you lack the good judgment to continue to edit here, you refuse or are unable to assume good faith on the part of other editors, and further action is needed. ----Dr.Margi ✉ 03:32, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
We have a crystal clear policy against making legal threats: WP:NLT. You are, of course, legally allowed to try to sue whoever you want to, but you cannot edit WP while doing so, or threatening to do so. You'll need to withdraw that legal threat if you wish to continue editing here. Since I've gone ahead and removed the clear violation of policy, the way to indicate you withdraw it is to say so here. -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 15:47, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Please
stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
Callmemirela 🍁
talk
22:16, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
The editors on Talk:Happy! (TV series) were asking a real question. Your revert and edit summary seems rather WP:BITEy. Answering them and explaining signature etiquette would have been a much friendlier way to handle it. Argento Surfer ( talk) 12:25, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
A discussion was started on Brojam's talk page and The List of This Is Us episodes talk page. Do not revert the edit until the discussion is complete. Also, there is a series of 4 edits done on 4 different pages. By you reverting just the 1 edit, you're making this much more confusing. Please stop. Rswallis10 ( talk) 21:58, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Good evening from Coreca, I'm writing to say hello, thank you and know how you are. I'm pretty good for now, working intensely in the olives. So I write to you to ask for a very but very valuable help, which will be generously and generously recompensed. I tell you these two articles that serve a hand of help, providence I dare say, and only you who are practical can help me. Right and no more than 10 minutes of your precious time to save Sabrina Ferilli and Katrin Heß, or rather their biographies. then if I can do something for you in Sicilian and Sicilian I will be happy to help you. a fervent greeting from Calabria-- Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino ( talk) 19:00, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Please
assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not do on
Rellik (TV series). Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Edit descriptions like, 'All edits by IP are BS' do not encourage editors to make constructive contributions. I fully believe they meant well in their additions. It would not have harmed for you to have explained your issues on their talk page, rather than leaving an unnecessarily rude revert message on an article page. Looking through your contributions, and this talk page, you have a history of 'losing your cool' when dealing with others. –
Sb
2001
00:34, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Why did you do what you did? Why would I want you to move a valid redirect into my userspace? Also, you didn't do it correctly. – Muboshgu ( talk) 04:24, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Robberey, you seem to have the mistaken idea that they only way to describe the remaining episode order for a 22 episode first season is as the "back nine." That's utter nonsense. Back nine is industry media jargon, coined by Variety Magazine, that is picked up and in common use. But it is far from being the only way to describe those additional nine episodes. Your reverts not only forced in industry jargon that ordinary readers may not understand, but it also added a grammatical error that suggested that the remaining order was 13, not nine, episodes. That was the principal reason for my reverts. Your grammar tends to be poor, and you frequently mis-use words. Most of the time these days, I leave that to other editors since your obnoxious interpersonal behavior hasn't improved and I'm simply tired of it, but this was too egregious an error imposed on my grammatically and semantically correct edit to overlook.
Describing those episodes as the final, remaining or additional episodes in the season order are perfectly correct, perfectly valid uses of other adjectives. This is an encyclopedia, not an industry publication, and there is no one way to describe the episodes that complete a full season order. You are both edit warring and editing disruptively, things you're very fond of accusing other editors of doing, by forcing that edit. The version that it there now is acceptable, so leave it alone. ----Dr.Margi ✉ 17:28, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Robberey1705. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
You recently deleted a very small addition I made to the page for Reverie. I was preparing to make a much larger edit but now am afraid I'll be wasting my time. You said IMDB was not an acceptable source. I work on the show. Am I an acceptable source? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barrycaldwell ( talk • contribs) 23:54, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
May I ask what " Suitable own purpose edit" means? Callmemirela 🍁 talk 20:27, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
I notice that you’ve recently created a disambiguation page for Ghost Nation. It should be noted that a disambiguation page is only required whenever, for a given word or phrase on which a reader might search, there is more than one existing Wikipedia article to which that word or phrase might be expected to lead. In this case there is only one article relating to Ghost Nation, therefore a disambiguation page is not required. Dan arndt ( talk) 22:46, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Babymissfortune. Robberey1705, thanks for creating Nightflyers (TV series)!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please provide references, once they became more available. Thanks.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Happy New Year!!! Baby miss fortune 16:23, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
I see that you have chosen to be belligerent rather than take advice with repect to your deletion proposal of this article. I don't know how you made your proposal, but you need to undo it and redo it according to the instructions at
WP:PROD. The way that you did it means that the proposal will not expire until March, rather than the usual seven days. This is nothing to do with the 24-hour clock, but simply that you have not followed the correct procedure by placing {{
subst:Proposed deletion|concern=reason for proposed deletion}}
on the page.
86.17.222.157 (
talk)
22:31, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Once again, a reminder to remain polite and civil when writing edit summaries. You can make your point just as effectively without talking to editors as though they are stupid. This summary is totally out of line; the editor made an honest mistake. Try assuming good faith, something you never do. ----Dr.Margi ✉ 16:54, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sankt Maik, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stromberg ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:21, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Utopia (UK TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:40, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
Please stop removing well-sourced material from Alternative for Germany or you may be blocked from editing. Note also that your own version is not coherent English; I don't understand what "Parts of the AfD have and tendencies linked to right wing parties movements" means. Bishonen | talk 18:09, 23 April 2018 (UTC).
Whilst you may consider information on WP as "unnecessary" let me assure you that useful information is exactly why WP is edited. In this instance it was details of the central location where the series is set, which will certainly be of interest to those who do not live in London. Given that presently the series is only available on BBC America that will be almost the entirety of the audience. -- AlisonW ( talk) 21:55, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Added the data, but kept it from intruding on visible table. Can follow up after final title is made known. Jmg38 ( talk) 08:51, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Your move of the Magnum P.I. has been reverted as a WP:BOLD edit and against WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. -- Alex TW 13:03, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Untitled ABC Studios International TV series for French broadcaster M6, Robberey1705!
Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Please move this article to a more appropriate title as soon as the actual title of the series becomes known.
To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 05:54, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
I saw in one of the reference links that season 1 released at 12AM. Is season 2 the same? You don't think people might like to know? (thanks for deleting my post.) still signed Robinrobin ( talk) 02:11, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Robberey1705,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Flack (TV series) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flack (TV series) .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
Jamez42 ( talk) 22:07, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Robberey1705,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether The Trial Of Christine Keeler should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Trial Of Christine Keeler .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
Jamez42 ( talk) 22:10, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Robberey1705,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Reckoning (TV series) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reckoning (TV series) .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
Jamez42 ( talk) 22:10, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Per this deletion discussion The Trial Of Christine Keeler has been moved to the draft space.
um you better check this out at http://tviv.org/F.B.I. to see who the real creator of this show
[2] Consistist of ten episodes." Read what you write...
--
Alex
TW
11:28, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Treadstone, has been published WP:TOOSOON. Per WP:NYF, series that have not begun principal photography should not have their own articles in the mainspace.
In the absence of extensive non-routine coverage by reliable sources, the article should stay in draftspace until principal photography begins (which according to the article, will occur in 2019) signed, Rosguill talk 22:24, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Robberey1705. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Muscle Shoals".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ― Abelmoschus Esculentus 09:17, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Robberey1705. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Metropolis".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo ( talk) 20:17, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Robberey1705. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Sandstein 23:00, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I would like to formally apologise for our little misunderstanding earlier. I hope we can both work on the Trial Of(/of X) ) Christine Keeler page together. Saxonvsjones ( talk) 18:13, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Famous (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Famous (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 19:12, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
It was moved to draft space because
It was redirect to Scarlet Witch as it has the information about the TV show as it was original only about her. Spshu ( talk) 14:53, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Draft:The Vision and Scarlet Witch requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Duplicate page of Draft:Vision and the Scarlet Witch. I suggest that the main draft should be renamed to this new title.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Trailblazer101 ( talk) 15:11, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi there - This edit appears, at first glance, to be quite rude. I would suggest you strike and rephrase it to not cast aspersions on the nominator; your Keep !vote will probably carry more weight that way, too. Additionally; this is enwiki, not dewiki. It is polite to speak English here - Although the nominator speaks German, there are other non-German speakers who are also interested in this topic. Bis bald! -- a. get in the spam hole | get nosey 16:33, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
The Dublin Murders, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). Further, because this is a show that is not yet released, it should not be published without evidence that it is out of pre-production, per
WP:NFF. I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Citrivescence (
talk)
02:54, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Untitled ABC Studios International TV series for French broadcaster M6. Since you had some involvement with the Untitled ABC Studios International TV series for French broadcaster M6 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 15:41, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
You have been warned multiple times about creating articles too early. Penny Dreadful: City of Angels and Resident Alien (TV series) have been moved to the draft space; neither series has yet began filming. -- / Alex/ 21 10:03, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for creating The Murders.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
please add plot, development, and critical reception sections
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Citrivescence}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Citrivescence ( talk) 15:05, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Robberey1705. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Metropolis".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 14:28, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
I just spotted your reversal at https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Librem_5&oldid=prev&diff=937871403 and still think that my edit makes sense. I've explained it in the revision comment: The pinephone is one of many already listed in "List of open-source mobile phones". The librem5 and pinephone are often compared with one another, but also with other phones, notably the fairphone. There doesn't seem to be a good reason to single out the pinephone on the librem5 page, just like the librem5 isn't mentioned on the pinephone page.
You suggest searching for a discussion before doing things like that, but the pinephone link was originally added without any discussion or comment: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Librem_5&diff=928838913&oldid=928838780 so why didn't that get reverted ? Both phones are IMHO great products, but Wikipedia should remain neutral, which I think means removing this particular link. Moltonel3xCombo ( talk) 18:45, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Robberey1705. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Brave New World".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 02:39, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
The article Gorilla and the Bird has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
"Upcoming" since 2018 with no further progress made. Sources say nothing except that it's coming soon and involves a director who is now dead, likely indicating that the show was aborted with no further verifiable content made.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (
What did I screw up now?)
04:36, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gorilla and the Bird until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 15:36, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The redirect
Avonmore (Bryan Ferry album has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 13 § Avonmore (Bryan Ferry album until a consensus is reached.
Utopes (
talk /
cont)
05:55, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Cleanup on August 7, 2017. Start new discussions under the line.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to
assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Edits with which you do not agree are not disruptive unless specifically designed to disrupt the article. Like you did with incorrect and excessive labeling of perfectly reasonable edits as vandalism, you have abused Wikipedia policies and expectations in order to intimidate other editors by describing perfectly reasonable edits as disruptive. It is clear you lack the good judgment to continue to edit here, you refuse or are unable to assume good faith on the part of other editors, and further action is needed. ----Dr.Margi ✉ 03:32, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
We have a crystal clear policy against making legal threats: WP:NLT. You are, of course, legally allowed to try to sue whoever you want to, but you cannot edit WP while doing so, or threatening to do so. You'll need to withdraw that legal threat if you wish to continue editing here. Since I've gone ahead and removed the clear violation of policy, the way to indicate you withdraw it is to say so here. -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 15:47, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Please
stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
Callmemirela 🍁
talk
22:16, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
The editors on Talk:Happy! (TV series) were asking a real question. Your revert and edit summary seems rather WP:BITEy. Answering them and explaining signature etiquette would have been a much friendlier way to handle it. Argento Surfer ( talk) 12:25, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
A discussion was started on Brojam's talk page and The List of This Is Us episodes talk page. Do not revert the edit until the discussion is complete. Also, there is a series of 4 edits done on 4 different pages. By you reverting just the 1 edit, you're making this much more confusing. Please stop. Rswallis10 ( talk) 21:58, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Good evening from Coreca, I'm writing to say hello, thank you and know how you are. I'm pretty good for now, working intensely in the olives. So I write to you to ask for a very but very valuable help, which will be generously and generously recompensed. I tell you these two articles that serve a hand of help, providence I dare say, and only you who are practical can help me. Right and no more than 10 minutes of your precious time to save Sabrina Ferilli and Katrin Heß, or rather their biographies. then if I can do something for you in Sicilian and Sicilian I will be happy to help you. a fervent greeting from Calabria-- Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino ( talk) 19:00, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Please
assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not do on
Rellik (TV series). Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Edit descriptions like, 'All edits by IP are BS' do not encourage editors to make constructive contributions. I fully believe they meant well in their additions. It would not have harmed for you to have explained your issues on their talk page, rather than leaving an unnecessarily rude revert message on an article page. Looking through your contributions, and this talk page, you have a history of 'losing your cool' when dealing with others. –
Sb
2001
00:34, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Why did you do what you did? Why would I want you to move a valid redirect into my userspace? Also, you didn't do it correctly. – Muboshgu ( talk) 04:24, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Robberey, you seem to have the mistaken idea that they only way to describe the remaining episode order for a 22 episode first season is as the "back nine." That's utter nonsense. Back nine is industry media jargon, coined by Variety Magazine, that is picked up and in common use. But it is far from being the only way to describe those additional nine episodes. Your reverts not only forced in industry jargon that ordinary readers may not understand, but it also added a grammatical error that suggested that the remaining order was 13, not nine, episodes. That was the principal reason for my reverts. Your grammar tends to be poor, and you frequently mis-use words. Most of the time these days, I leave that to other editors since your obnoxious interpersonal behavior hasn't improved and I'm simply tired of it, but this was too egregious an error imposed on my grammatically and semantically correct edit to overlook.
Describing those episodes as the final, remaining or additional episodes in the season order are perfectly correct, perfectly valid uses of other adjectives. This is an encyclopedia, not an industry publication, and there is no one way to describe the episodes that complete a full season order. You are both edit warring and editing disruptively, things you're very fond of accusing other editors of doing, by forcing that edit. The version that it there now is acceptable, so leave it alone. ----Dr.Margi ✉ 17:28, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Robberey1705. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
You recently deleted a very small addition I made to the page for Reverie. I was preparing to make a much larger edit but now am afraid I'll be wasting my time. You said IMDB was not an acceptable source. I work on the show. Am I an acceptable source? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barrycaldwell ( talk • contribs) 23:54, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
May I ask what " Suitable own purpose edit" means? Callmemirela 🍁 talk 20:27, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
I notice that you’ve recently created a disambiguation page for Ghost Nation. It should be noted that a disambiguation page is only required whenever, for a given word or phrase on which a reader might search, there is more than one existing Wikipedia article to which that word or phrase might be expected to lead. In this case there is only one article relating to Ghost Nation, therefore a disambiguation page is not required. Dan arndt ( talk) 22:46, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Babymissfortune. Robberey1705, thanks for creating Nightflyers (TV series)!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please provide references, once they became more available. Thanks.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Happy New Year!!! Baby miss fortune 16:23, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
I see that you have chosen to be belligerent rather than take advice with repect to your deletion proposal of this article. I don't know how you made your proposal, but you need to undo it and redo it according to the instructions at
WP:PROD. The way that you did it means that the proposal will not expire until March, rather than the usual seven days. This is nothing to do with the 24-hour clock, but simply that you have not followed the correct procedure by placing {{
subst:Proposed deletion|concern=reason for proposed deletion}}
on the page.
86.17.222.157 (
talk)
22:31, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Once again, a reminder to remain polite and civil when writing edit summaries. You can make your point just as effectively without talking to editors as though they are stupid. This summary is totally out of line; the editor made an honest mistake. Try assuming good faith, something you never do. ----Dr.Margi ✉ 16:54, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sankt Maik, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stromberg ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:21, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Utopia (UK TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:40, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
Please stop removing well-sourced material from Alternative for Germany or you may be blocked from editing. Note also that your own version is not coherent English; I don't understand what "Parts of the AfD have and tendencies linked to right wing parties movements" means. Bishonen | talk 18:09, 23 April 2018 (UTC).
Whilst you may consider information on WP as "unnecessary" let me assure you that useful information is exactly why WP is edited. In this instance it was details of the central location where the series is set, which will certainly be of interest to those who do not live in London. Given that presently the series is only available on BBC America that will be almost the entirety of the audience. -- AlisonW ( talk) 21:55, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Added the data, but kept it from intruding on visible table. Can follow up after final title is made known. Jmg38 ( talk) 08:51, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Your move of the Magnum P.I. has been reverted as a WP:BOLD edit and against WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. -- Alex TW 13:03, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Untitled ABC Studios International TV series for French broadcaster M6, Robberey1705!
Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Please move this article to a more appropriate title as soon as the actual title of the series becomes known.
To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 05:54, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
I saw in one of the reference links that season 1 released at 12AM. Is season 2 the same? You don't think people might like to know? (thanks for deleting my post.) still signed Robinrobin ( talk) 02:11, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Robberey1705,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Flack (TV series) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flack (TV series) .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
Jamez42 ( talk) 22:07, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Robberey1705,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether The Trial Of Christine Keeler should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Trial Of Christine Keeler .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
Jamez42 ( talk) 22:10, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Robberey1705,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Reckoning (TV series) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reckoning (TV series) .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
Jamez42 ( talk) 22:10, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Per this deletion discussion The Trial Of Christine Keeler has been moved to the draft space.
um you better check this out at http://tviv.org/F.B.I. to see who the real creator of this show
[2] Consistist of ten episodes." Read what you write...
--
Alex
TW
11:28, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Treadstone, has been published WP:TOOSOON. Per WP:NYF, series that have not begun principal photography should not have their own articles in the mainspace.
In the absence of extensive non-routine coverage by reliable sources, the article should stay in draftspace until principal photography begins (which according to the article, will occur in 2019) signed, Rosguill talk 22:24, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Robberey1705. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Muscle Shoals".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ― Abelmoschus Esculentus 09:17, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Robberey1705. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Metropolis".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo ( talk) 20:17, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Robberey1705. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Sandstein 23:00, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I would like to formally apologise for our little misunderstanding earlier. I hope we can both work on the Trial Of(/of X) ) Christine Keeler page together. Saxonvsjones ( talk) 18:13, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Famous (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Famous (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 19:12, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
It was moved to draft space because
It was redirect to Scarlet Witch as it has the information about the TV show as it was original only about her. Spshu ( talk) 14:53, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Draft:The Vision and Scarlet Witch requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Duplicate page of Draft:Vision and the Scarlet Witch. I suggest that the main draft should be renamed to this new title.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Trailblazer101 ( talk) 15:11, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi there - This edit appears, at first glance, to be quite rude. I would suggest you strike and rephrase it to not cast aspersions on the nominator; your Keep !vote will probably carry more weight that way, too. Additionally; this is enwiki, not dewiki. It is polite to speak English here - Although the nominator speaks German, there are other non-German speakers who are also interested in this topic. Bis bald! -- a. get in the spam hole | get nosey 16:33, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
The Dublin Murders, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). Further, because this is a show that is not yet released, it should not be published without evidence that it is out of pre-production, per
WP:NFF. I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Citrivescence (
talk)
02:54, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Untitled ABC Studios International TV series for French broadcaster M6. Since you had some involvement with the Untitled ABC Studios International TV series for French broadcaster M6 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 15:41, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
You have been warned multiple times about creating articles too early. Penny Dreadful: City of Angels and Resident Alien (TV series) have been moved to the draft space; neither series has yet began filming. -- / Alex/ 21 10:03, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for creating The Murders.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
please add plot, development, and critical reception sections
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Citrivescence}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Citrivescence ( talk) 15:05, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Robberey1705. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Metropolis".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 14:28, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
I just spotted your reversal at https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Librem_5&oldid=prev&diff=937871403 and still think that my edit makes sense. I've explained it in the revision comment: The pinephone is one of many already listed in "List of open-source mobile phones". The librem5 and pinephone are often compared with one another, but also with other phones, notably the fairphone. There doesn't seem to be a good reason to single out the pinephone on the librem5 page, just like the librem5 isn't mentioned on the pinephone page.
You suggest searching for a discussion before doing things like that, but the pinephone link was originally added without any discussion or comment: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Librem_5&diff=928838913&oldid=928838780 so why didn't that get reverted ? Both phones are IMHO great products, but Wikipedia should remain neutral, which I think means removing this particular link. Moltonel3xCombo ( talk) 18:45, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Robberey1705. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Brave New World".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 02:39, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
The article Gorilla and the Bird has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
"Upcoming" since 2018 with no further progress made. Sources say nothing except that it's coming soon and involves a director who is now dead, likely indicating that the show was aborted with no further verifiable content made.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (
What did I screw up now?)
04:36, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gorilla and the Bird until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 15:36, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The redirect
Avonmore (Bryan Ferry album has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 13 § Avonmore (Bryan Ferry album until a consensus is reached.
Utopes (
talk /
cont)
05:55, 13 January 2024 (UTC)