Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
Happy editing! Cheers, 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 12:25, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to
Draft:Pir Alamah Sayyid Ihsanullah Shah Rashdi while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being
blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's
policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your
IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you.
Theroadislong (
talk) 19:54, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to
Sayyid Ihsanullah Shah Rashdi while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being
blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's
policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your
IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you.
Theroadislong (
talk) 21:57, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to
Sayyid Ihsanullah Shah Rashdi , you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors
do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. It is tiring and frustrating to other, more experienced, editors who are trying to help you if you re-add content that they advised doesn't belong in the article, or if you ignore the comments made in their edit summaries about why certain words should be deleted and re-insert them. We are all volunteers here and trying to help, but you need to help yourself.
Curb Safe Charmer (
talk) 09:13, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to
Sayyid Ihsanullah Shah Rashdi did not have an
edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be
quite brief.
The edit summary field looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a
Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences →
Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button.
Thanks!
Curb Safe Charmer (
talk) 09:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi SaneFlint! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at
Sayyid Ihsanullah Shah Rashdi that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see
Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.
Theroadislong (
talk) 20:37, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi,
I attempted to fix some of the citations in your draft, including a duplicated citation that somehow ended up in plain text. Also, make sure your topic is notable and is actually worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia. Also I would advise you to read WP:REFB for guidance about citations. Best, Seawolf35 T-- C 23:25, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Do you want me to take a fair look at your draft and do some cleanup? I may also remove unreliable sources and add the "need citation" tag. Let me know if you are okay with it. Jeraxmoira ( talk) 17:22, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Yes, share 3 of your best sources here that meets WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV or WP:SNG. Jeraxmoira ( talk) 21:58, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, SaneFlint!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Theroadislong (
talk) 08:49, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
|
I have concluded that this draft has reached end of its road.
We need neutral, flat prose. Dull-but worthy is the tone we aim for.
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 12:24, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Never, ever take it personally. If they have made deletions, they have made deletions.If they make additions, they make additions. Right now, be an interested spectator, nothing more. That is easy to hear, but hard to do. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 09:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
can you check again? I've fixed many things SaneFlint ( talk) 21:01, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 00:07, 27 November 2023 (UTC)You asked:
Question number 1 where I will need to show those references? in a discussion form?
question number 2. it should be short answer or I should also tell them the reason of submitting it for over 12 times or 10. as I was new here and I thought after submitting it I can calmly make edits while it will be under review thats why I wasted time to submit for over 10 times or even more dozens in a day. my English is second language that's why I had difficulty with changing its praising type tone. and every source I gave were legit which contains real information
The answer to Q1 is that you show it by doing t in the article
The answer to Q2 is that the reviews are now history, and irrelevant. The previous praising tone is now dealt with. This means all you need to deal with is the "Now", the present. All you need to find is references which pass the definition t hat you have now seen more than once. When you have done so, then make your reply, stating that you have edited the article to improve the referencing and prove notability (Assuming they prove notability) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 20:36, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sayyid Ihsanullah Shah Rashdi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Theroadislong ( talk) 18:14, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, SaneFlint. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on the page
Sayyid Ihsanullah Shah Rashdi, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. You are heavily invested in this topic, so it is logical to ask if you have any connection to them? Theroadislong ( talk) 08:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at
Sayyid, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use
your sandbox for that. Thank you.
Theroadislong (
talk) 15:49, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
MBlaze Lightning. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Khilafat Movement, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
MBlaze Lightning (
talk) 03:45, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi SaneFlint. Have you used any other account to edit Wikipedia previously, aside from SaneFlint? Jeraxmoira ( talk) 19:14, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello SaneFlint, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Badi' ud-Din Shah al-Rashidi, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badi' ud-Din Shah al-Rashidi (2nd nomination).
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}
. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk) 22:34, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.SaneFlint ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Subject: Urgent Appeal for Wikipedia Account Reinstatement - SaneFlint
Dear Wikipedia Administrators,
I humbly submit this appeal in earnest acknowledgment of the concerns surrounding my account, SaneFlint. I understand the gravity of the situation and wish to provide a compelling explanation for thoughtful consideration.
I take responsibility for accounts (only) created on my phone by a friend without emails, which were resulting in lose as they were without emails, This situation is akin to lending a licensed gun, where the wielder's actions become my responsibility. I genuinely regret this oversight and assure you that I am fully committed to abiding by Wikipedia's guidelines.
Upon joining Wikipedia, I was a complete newcomer, unaware of certain critical aspects. My sincere goal is to actively contribute to Wikipedia's growth, aligning my actions with the values of this community. I am dedicated to learning from my mistakes and ensuring that my future contributions adhere strictly to the platform's guidelines.
I am committed to clearing my name honorably, rejecting any notion of evading blocks. My loyalty lies with Wikipedia rules, and I seek the opportunity to prove my dedication through positive contributions. The chance to contribute honorably means more to me than any temporary workaround.
"I am eager to contribute meaningfully to Wikipedia by covering topics related to the Sindh region. Discussions in university classes have inspired an independent mentality, and I am committed to translating this inspiration into well-researched and informative articles. If given a second chance, I promise to dedicate myself to creating 5 to 10 different subjects in the coming days also alot in my sight requires fixing, addressing the gaps in coverage. My sincere aim is to add valuable content and showcase the richness of the Sindh region on English Wikipedia. I believe this commitment will demonstrate my genuine intent and contribute positively to the Wikipedia community.
Additionally, I recognize the role of University WiFi in the situation and assure you that, with a clearer understanding, such issues won't recur. I am committed to responsible use and request your consideration in granting me an opportunity to contribute positively to Wikipedia's community.
Your understanding and the chance to rectify my actions are of utmost importance to me. I appreciate your time and consideration in reviewing this appeal.
Thank you for considering my appeal."
Best regards,
( sorry I had to post it again as I was not able to reply on previous section probably due to glitch or block)
Decline reason:
We do not consider chatbot-generated requests. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 18:58, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
SaneFlint ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Dear Wikipedia admins, I'm here to humbly submit this appeal in earnest acknowledgement of concerns surrounding my account, SaneFlint, I have the importance of the situation and am willing to provide a productive explanation for thoughtful consideration, Let me take responsibility for accounts that were created on my device. Even it was created for a friend but it was my responsibility as it was created on my phone its same like a gun having a license on my name and I let someone else to use my gun for his actions. also, during that time, I wasn't aware of Wikipedia rules and policies, so I fell into that trap, but that's what made me understand rules and get better with that. I genuinely regret anything that happened in the past, which caused my account to suffer. Also, my time and peace were affected because of that mistake, which I believe was last will not happen again. After joining Wikipedia, I was a complete newbie. Who wasn't aware of anything literally nothing even fixing citations hard thing for me. My sincere goal is to actively contribute to the great Wikipedia growth, aligning my actions with the values of this amazing community. I have learnt from my mistakes, and I'm giving my promise that nothing like that will be repeated. Everyone deserves a chance to prove himself, and I am sure I will be able to prove myself. My future contributions adhere to the platform's rules and guidelines, I am more than committed to clearing my name honorably than avoiding blocks by using different internets and computers. I really seek the opportunity to prove myself through positive contributions. The last chance to contribute honorably which means more to me than any temporary workaround. I am eager to contribute meaningfully to Wikipedia by covering topics related to the Sindh region, My sincere aim is to showcase the richness of Sindh history and culture, which I felt is getting very poor courage on Wikipedia, especially on English one. Also by going thru different topics I found articles literally hundreds of articles which were not proper enough to be on Wikipedia. I would work to rebuild them as well. Which was kinda meaningful to me. I was usually using university shared WiFi and public shared internets but anything after all I am responsible and I accept this.
Sometimes accepting mistakes/ taking responsibility than arguing, solves more problems than a argument and disputes. Now my aim is to seek for a second last chance to prove myself nothing like that will happen again anymore. Your greater understanding and chance to rectify my actions are of utmost importance to me. I appreciate your time and consideration in reviewing this appeal, it means alot to me and I will appreciate it. Thank you for considering my appeal , With best regards and wishes.:)
Decline reason:
Again, this appears to be an AI generated request. I am declining this request. PhilKnight ( talk) 15:30, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
. SaneFlint ( talk) 19:28, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
First time I've seen it and heard of it from you I wasn't aware of this account who is he? strange urdu name in it. and I've never been to Russia 🇷🇺
seems someone who may hate me and want me down?
and one more question to you Jeraxmoira. where are you from? Irish or Indian? I hope you're not an Indian who is being biased to me for his views or oppositions 🤔🤔 SaneFlint ( talk) 19:46, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Please
stop attacking other editors, as you did on
User talk:SaneFlint. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
Theroadislong (
talk) 20:19, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
just answered him but he has been attacking me while being too personal from a long time, I have all proves but I will rather prefer to ignore them and work for the best.
he should leave me alone than watching my talk page all the time to attack / slander me :)
if he even know me in real life and I can't recognise him still all the best to him.
I respect you and Timtrent here the most,
SaneFlint ( talk) 20:26, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
--jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 21:55, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello, SaneFlint. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Allamah Sayyid Badiuddin Shah Rashdi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 11:06, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
Happy editing! Cheers, 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 12:25, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to
Draft:Pir Alamah Sayyid Ihsanullah Shah Rashdi while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being
blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's
policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your
IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you.
Theroadislong (
talk) 19:54, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to
Sayyid Ihsanullah Shah Rashdi while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being
blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's
policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your
IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you.
Theroadislong (
talk) 21:57, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to
Sayyid Ihsanullah Shah Rashdi , you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors
do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. It is tiring and frustrating to other, more experienced, editors who are trying to help you if you re-add content that they advised doesn't belong in the article, or if you ignore the comments made in their edit summaries about why certain words should be deleted and re-insert them. We are all volunteers here and trying to help, but you need to help yourself.
Curb Safe Charmer (
talk) 09:13, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to
Sayyid Ihsanullah Shah Rashdi did not have an
edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be
quite brief.
The edit summary field looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a
Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences →
Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button.
Thanks!
Curb Safe Charmer (
talk) 09:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi SaneFlint! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at
Sayyid Ihsanullah Shah Rashdi that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see
Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.
Theroadislong (
talk) 20:37, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi,
I attempted to fix some of the citations in your draft, including a duplicated citation that somehow ended up in plain text. Also, make sure your topic is notable and is actually worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia. Also I would advise you to read WP:REFB for guidance about citations. Best, Seawolf35 T-- C 23:25, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Do you want me to take a fair look at your draft and do some cleanup? I may also remove unreliable sources and add the "need citation" tag. Let me know if you are okay with it. Jeraxmoira ( talk) 17:22, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Yes, share 3 of your best sources here that meets WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV or WP:SNG. Jeraxmoira ( talk) 21:58, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, SaneFlint!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Theroadislong (
talk) 08:49, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
|
I have concluded that this draft has reached end of its road.
We need neutral, flat prose. Dull-but worthy is the tone we aim for.
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 12:24, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Never, ever take it personally. If they have made deletions, they have made deletions.If they make additions, they make additions. Right now, be an interested spectator, nothing more. That is easy to hear, but hard to do. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 09:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
can you check again? I've fixed many things SaneFlint ( talk) 21:01, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 00:07, 27 November 2023 (UTC)You asked:
Question number 1 where I will need to show those references? in a discussion form?
question number 2. it should be short answer or I should also tell them the reason of submitting it for over 12 times or 10. as I was new here and I thought after submitting it I can calmly make edits while it will be under review thats why I wasted time to submit for over 10 times or even more dozens in a day. my English is second language that's why I had difficulty with changing its praising type tone. and every source I gave were legit which contains real information
The answer to Q1 is that you show it by doing t in the article
The answer to Q2 is that the reviews are now history, and irrelevant. The previous praising tone is now dealt with. This means all you need to deal with is the "Now", the present. All you need to find is references which pass the definition t hat you have now seen more than once. When you have done so, then make your reply, stating that you have edited the article to improve the referencing and prove notability (Assuming they prove notability) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 20:36, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sayyid Ihsanullah Shah Rashdi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Theroadislong ( talk) 18:14, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, SaneFlint. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on the page
Sayyid Ihsanullah Shah Rashdi, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. You are heavily invested in this topic, so it is logical to ask if you have any connection to them? Theroadislong ( talk) 08:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at
Sayyid, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use
your sandbox for that. Thank you.
Theroadislong (
talk) 15:49, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
MBlaze Lightning. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Khilafat Movement, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
MBlaze Lightning (
talk) 03:45, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi SaneFlint. Have you used any other account to edit Wikipedia previously, aside from SaneFlint? Jeraxmoira ( talk) 19:14, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello SaneFlint, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Badi' ud-Din Shah al-Rashidi, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badi' ud-Din Shah al-Rashidi (2nd nomination).
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}
. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk) 22:34, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.SaneFlint ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Subject: Urgent Appeal for Wikipedia Account Reinstatement - SaneFlint
Dear Wikipedia Administrators,
I humbly submit this appeal in earnest acknowledgment of the concerns surrounding my account, SaneFlint. I understand the gravity of the situation and wish to provide a compelling explanation for thoughtful consideration.
I take responsibility for accounts (only) created on my phone by a friend without emails, which were resulting in lose as they were without emails, This situation is akin to lending a licensed gun, where the wielder's actions become my responsibility. I genuinely regret this oversight and assure you that I am fully committed to abiding by Wikipedia's guidelines.
Upon joining Wikipedia, I was a complete newcomer, unaware of certain critical aspects. My sincere goal is to actively contribute to Wikipedia's growth, aligning my actions with the values of this community. I am dedicated to learning from my mistakes and ensuring that my future contributions adhere strictly to the platform's guidelines.
I am committed to clearing my name honorably, rejecting any notion of evading blocks. My loyalty lies with Wikipedia rules, and I seek the opportunity to prove my dedication through positive contributions. The chance to contribute honorably means more to me than any temporary workaround.
"I am eager to contribute meaningfully to Wikipedia by covering topics related to the Sindh region. Discussions in university classes have inspired an independent mentality, and I am committed to translating this inspiration into well-researched and informative articles. If given a second chance, I promise to dedicate myself to creating 5 to 10 different subjects in the coming days also alot in my sight requires fixing, addressing the gaps in coverage. My sincere aim is to add valuable content and showcase the richness of the Sindh region on English Wikipedia. I believe this commitment will demonstrate my genuine intent and contribute positively to the Wikipedia community.
Additionally, I recognize the role of University WiFi in the situation and assure you that, with a clearer understanding, such issues won't recur. I am committed to responsible use and request your consideration in granting me an opportunity to contribute positively to Wikipedia's community.
Your understanding and the chance to rectify my actions are of utmost importance to me. I appreciate your time and consideration in reviewing this appeal.
Thank you for considering my appeal."
Best regards,
( sorry I had to post it again as I was not able to reply on previous section probably due to glitch or block)
Decline reason:
We do not consider chatbot-generated requests. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 18:58, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
SaneFlint ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Dear Wikipedia admins, I'm here to humbly submit this appeal in earnest acknowledgement of concerns surrounding my account, SaneFlint, I have the importance of the situation and am willing to provide a productive explanation for thoughtful consideration, Let me take responsibility for accounts that were created on my device. Even it was created for a friend but it was my responsibility as it was created on my phone its same like a gun having a license on my name and I let someone else to use my gun for his actions. also, during that time, I wasn't aware of Wikipedia rules and policies, so I fell into that trap, but that's what made me understand rules and get better with that. I genuinely regret anything that happened in the past, which caused my account to suffer. Also, my time and peace were affected because of that mistake, which I believe was last will not happen again. After joining Wikipedia, I was a complete newbie. Who wasn't aware of anything literally nothing even fixing citations hard thing for me. My sincere goal is to actively contribute to the great Wikipedia growth, aligning my actions with the values of this amazing community. I have learnt from my mistakes, and I'm giving my promise that nothing like that will be repeated. Everyone deserves a chance to prove himself, and I am sure I will be able to prove myself. My future contributions adhere to the platform's rules and guidelines, I am more than committed to clearing my name honorably than avoiding blocks by using different internets and computers. I really seek the opportunity to prove myself through positive contributions. The last chance to contribute honorably which means more to me than any temporary workaround. I am eager to contribute meaningfully to Wikipedia by covering topics related to the Sindh region, My sincere aim is to showcase the richness of Sindh history and culture, which I felt is getting very poor courage on Wikipedia, especially on English one. Also by going thru different topics I found articles literally hundreds of articles which were not proper enough to be on Wikipedia. I would work to rebuild them as well. Which was kinda meaningful to me. I was usually using university shared WiFi and public shared internets but anything after all I am responsible and I accept this.
Sometimes accepting mistakes/ taking responsibility than arguing, solves more problems than a argument and disputes. Now my aim is to seek for a second last chance to prove myself nothing like that will happen again anymore. Your greater understanding and chance to rectify my actions are of utmost importance to me. I appreciate your time and consideration in reviewing this appeal, it means alot to me and I will appreciate it. Thank you for considering my appeal , With best regards and wishes.:)
Decline reason:
Again, this appears to be an AI generated request. I am declining this request. PhilKnight ( talk) 15:30, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
. SaneFlint ( talk) 19:28, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
First time I've seen it and heard of it from you I wasn't aware of this account who is he? strange urdu name in it. and I've never been to Russia 🇷🇺
seems someone who may hate me and want me down?
and one more question to you Jeraxmoira. where are you from? Irish or Indian? I hope you're not an Indian who is being biased to me for his views or oppositions 🤔🤔 SaneFlint ( talk) 19:46, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Please
stop attacking other editors, as you did on
User talk:SaneFlint. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
Theroadislong (
talk) 20:19, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
just answered him but he has been attacking me while being too personal from a long time, I have all proves but I will rather prefer to ignore them and work for the best.
he should leave me alone than watching my talk page all the time to attack / slander me :)
if he even know me in real life and I can't recognise him still all the best to him.
I respect you and Timtrent here the most,
SaneFlint ( talk) 20:26, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
--jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 21:55, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello, SaneFlint. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Allamah Sayyid Badiuddin Shah Rashdi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 11:06, 10 May 2024 (UTC)