![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
Greetings! I noticed your progress in creating stub templates, and I see that you've figured out some of the pitfalls of the process thereof. You seem to have good intentions and I would encourage you to check in with the stub sorting project when convenient. There you'll find guidelines on how to format the parts of a stub template and what to do with categories, for example:
These and other stub-related goodies are available at the link given above! Come by any time. Cheers, Her Pegship ( talk) 22:20, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi. If you could somehow flesh out as many of those footballer stubs as you can they can join the main list and be counted!♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:04, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Only today and tomorrow left on Wikipedia:WikiProject England/The West Country Challenge. We need 42 articles to pass 500. If you feel like fleshing out a few articles/ref fixing/cleanup of some articles that would be very welcome!♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:31, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scotland women's national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lee Alexander. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:32, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of weightlifters at the 2003 World Weightlifting Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of weightlifters at the 2003 World Weightlifting Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 19:25, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of weightlifters at the 2007 World Weightlifting Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of weightlifters at the 2007 World Weightlifting Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 19:27, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of weightlifters at the 1999 World Weightlifting Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of weightlifters at the 1999 World Weightlifting Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 19:27, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of weightlifters at the 2006 World Weightlifting Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of weightlifters at the 2006 World Weightlifting Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 19:27, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of weightlifters at the 1998 World Weightlifting Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of weightlifters at the 1998 World Weightlifting Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 19:28, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of weightlifters at the 2010 World Weightlifting Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of weightlifters at the 2010 World Weightlifting Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 19:28, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give
Francois Etoundi a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "
cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the
page history, which is
legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Dl2000 ( talk) 00:27, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:44, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
|
Thank you for adding so many female athlete bios in under-represented sports In ictu oculi ( talk) 15:50, 16 September 2016 (UTC) |
The previous title's Archive Talk:List of professional cyclists who died during a race/Archive 1 is now orphaned, could you please move it as well & fix any other archiving issues? Thanks, Shearonink ( talk) 00:18, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:54, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of weightlifters at the 2011 World Weightlifting Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of weightlifters at the 2011 World Weightlifting Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 19:28, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mónica Carrió, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alzira. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:55, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for starting Khadijah Hunter page. I did a little bit of expanding but I feel you should try adding some more content if you can find. Thank you! :) Jim Carter 15:06, 28 September 2016 (UTC) |
Hi, thanks for creating the lot of Bosnia and Herzegovina national sitting volleyball team players profile pages (like Safet Alibašić the one you created, and others). Help me dig up Sydney 2000 Paralympics results in sitting volleyball. I need the exact scores in each set. if not too much problem. I can not dig up any source. Keep up the good work. BiHVolim ( talk) 14:48, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
You are cordially welcome to join us in this discussion about the new intricate Filipino Nav box. -- Osplace 16:13, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Of late you have been creating a hoard of articles on weightlifters-who all share a common point-"participation in the 1999 world championships".You seem to provide very less data except that one particular info.Thus it would be kind of you to explain whether simple participation in a world championship suffices an encycloepadic entry for any person !!!!! Aru@baska ❯❯❯ Vanguard 12:08, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Hey. I've been adding wikiproject boxes to your talk pages for the new articles you've been making for female weightlifters. Just to let you know I'm heading off for the day so i won't be getting any more of them done. Its pretty much a copy paste job if you don't mind doing it yourself to save someone the time of tracking them down later. Insert CleverPhrase Here 12:56, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
According to Template:Infobox volleyball biography the number parameter is for the current club, not the national team. Thank you. -- Osplace 13:50, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:11, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Tayler Sanders. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Tyler Sanders. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Tyler Sanders – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Theo649 ( talk) 19:27, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
You put the category on the main space of new articles, please could you also back that up with minimally WP Biography|living=yes on the talk page at least, thanks JarrahTree 15:01, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Please note that in the past WP:BLP has been a serious issue, and any help in adding the requisite items is always appreciated JarrahTree 01:25, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi. You created the redirect Maria Fernanda Alvarez Zapata which goes to María Álvarez. María Álvarez is a Paralympic track athlete not a weightlifter. There doesn't seem to be an article on weightlifter. Tassedethe ( talk) 15:39, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Template:UHC2016riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
22:20, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Template:TPO2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
22:21, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Template:TIB2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
22:21, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Template:PAC2016riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
22:21, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Template:OPW2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
22:21, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Template:OGE2016riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
22:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Template:GPC2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
22:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Template:GPC2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
22:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Template:DNA2016riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
22:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello Sander.v.Ginkel,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Faitoga Togagae for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Xx236 ( talk) 13:14, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi, stubs are welcome for Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge. Some of your recent ones look like decent starts. Feel free to contribute! Asia needs to get off to a good start.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:03, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:05, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Template:FEN2005riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Primefac (
talk)
03:19, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Fixing the bias of History |
16% women on Wikipedia - We need to fix that and you are making a great contribution. You may have heard that the WiR wikiproject is a finalist for a UN-Women award - for this kind of work. A sample of your stubs are being tweeted at #wikiwomeninred. Thank you (on behalf of our g.daughters) for your efforts. Victuallers ( talk) 12:00, 22 October 2016 (UTC) |
![]() |
Moves like Kim Little Barnstar | |
As a recipient of the Kim Little barnstar, we'd like to thank you for make amazing Kim Little-like contributions to articles related to women's football (soccer) and WP:WOSO. Thank you for your diligent work! |
@ Hmlarson:, thanks a lot for this!! I saw the women's football players are under represented on Wikipedia. I started with the players at the world championships. But also the players who competed at other major international competitions are notable. So, it's just the beginning and will create many many more! Sander.v.Ginkel ( Talk) 07:53, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Two of yours; Lucie Záleská v. Lucie Hochmann ... same person? Fancy merging them? thanks
Also - have not checked if they're yours, but probably... Elizabeth Newell versus Elizabeth Hernandez (cyclist).
Finally Marta Pavlisová versus Marta Kroutilová. If you fancy doing anything with these three pairs, that'd be great. thanks -- Tagishsimon (talk) 18:35, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
G'day again, I have just fixed a few instances of "a Australian" in articles recently-created by your good self. Cheers YSSYguy ( talk) 02:04, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi! You added a small batch of Norwegian female footballers. Perhaps you should not have claimed that these players still play football, seeing as they are verging on age 40. Geschichte ( talk) 18:17, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for starting this list. Browsing through the template at the foot of the article, I noticed the actressess list. I'm going to make a note of that and start work on that one. Lugnuts Precious bodily fluids 19:56, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello Sander.v.Ginkel. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various
deletion criteria.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator.
Administrator note You have been grandfathered to this group based on prior patrolling activity - the technical flag for the group will be added to your account after the next software update. You do not need to apply at
WP:PERM. 20:56, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi, the women stubs count towards Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge, which you're very welcome to contribute to long term, or any of the other regional challenges. Keep up the good work!♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:25, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Esmost. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Văn Thị Thanh, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Є𐌔ⲘО𐌔𐍄 𐍄𐌀ℓК 21:09, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:19, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Tiven2240. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Wim Ernes, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Tiven gonsalves 11:22, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Google translate has almost 100% accuracy to translate Chinese name to English.-- AddisWang ( talk) 15:53, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
The article Siti Noor Halimi Hussain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. —
Yellow Dingo
(talk)
21:57, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
The article Nur Izzati Khairudin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. —
Yellow Dingo
(talk)
21:58, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
The article Farahiyah Ridzuan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. —
Yellow Dingo
(talk)
21:59, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Template:XSL2015riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Frietjes (
talk)
14:10, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Could you please fix Water polo at the 2007 World Aquatics Championships – Men's team rosters. It has links to 24 different disambiguation pages. The Banner talk 09:08, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
The article Sam Henderson (weightlifter) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The article creator is encouraged to peruse the linked guidelines and if additional sources exist that may lend themselves to establishing encyclopedic notability, please add them.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
16:53, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sam Henderson (weightlifter) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Henderson (weightlifter) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ad Orientem ( talk) 17:01, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Per MOS:OPENPARA#Birth date and place: "Birth and death places, if known, should be mentioned in the body of the article, and can be in the lead if relevant to the person's notability, but they should not be mentioned in the opening brackets of the lead sentence alongside the birth and death dates." – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 20:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heleri Saar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heleri Saar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 14:20, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Geit Prants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geit Prants until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 14:27, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Sander.v.Ginkel. Thanks again for your work in generating stub articles on women's footballers. Do you know of a way to automate tagging their talk pages with the Women's football taskforce? e.g., {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes|class=stub}} Hmlarson ( talk) 04:59, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello Sander.v.Ginkel.
Based on the patrols you made of new pages during a qualifying period in 2016, your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed.
New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Could you please change the name of the source ""2016–17 UCI Track Cycling World Cup (Glasgow) Enty List Men" and ""2016–17 UCI Track Cycling World Cup (Glasgow) Enty List Women"? Enty should be Entry. By the way, that source does not cover the type of race... The Banner talk 19:17, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Good morning, can you do me a favour, please? I am not really used to the English WP. Conords name is "Charlie", because he is French and not English. In Apeldoorn I asked him and he told me that "Charly" is wrong. -- Nicola ( talk) 09:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Grateful if you'd bring your full arsenal of obscure facts together to examine:
thanks :) -- Tagishsimon (talk) 18:35, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Sander.v.Ginkel. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove courtesy blanking from AFDs. It is only done when there are good reasons to do so, which may not be apparent to you from on-wiki discussions. Thanks. P.S. Your userpage looks like a WP:FAKEARTICLE. Could you please remove the lenghty content about your academic background per WP:USERBIO. SmartSE ( talk) 13:29, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, can you find a way to update the list here with flags for as many countries as possible?♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:48, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new Monitoring the system section in the tutorial.
With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation.
Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 09:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC) .
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Shyamala Shetty, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PageImp ( talk) 10:56, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Best Sander,
please crop the black margin before uploading.-- Recent contributor ( talk) 10:36, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Sander, here are some more photos: [2]. I read that you were born in Woerden. I was there once many years ago to make an interview with Arie van Vliet :) -- Nicola ( talk) 19:47, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, since Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Asian Month is semi-protected now, I post the following; you requested to put Asian characters romanized, and here they are. I'm not a native Chinese, but since Japanese share the same writing system (but we use traditional Chinese characters), I thought I could give you a hand.
BTW, would you mind to test Google translate or Wikipedia translation, by copy/paste a name and see what they give output? Most of the following, I used Google translate; by copy/paste names into the left box (Google translate), it shows below the box in gray the pronunciation. Hope those below will help you.
Nation / Name / simplified character = romanized / traditional character / $ ( zh:中国国家女子足球队#中國女足23人名单:)
-- Omotecho ( talk) 06:09, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
A link to a disambiguation, wrong. Xx236 ( talk) 13:10, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
No interwiki. Xx236 ( talk) 12:47, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
I undid your change. I can't find it in me to like the parentheses around sprinters, and around the whole list, in your version. The logic of the existing version was to start with Sportswomen, as a kind of list header which coincidently is a list name, and then show all of the sports in alpha order. With no parentheses, and certainly not with two levels of nested parentheses. "All are sportswomen and Sprinters are Athletes" may well be the case, but "you've made the list ugly for no tangible gain" is as easy to argue :) -- Tagishsimon ( talk) 06:10, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
As Fram ( talk · contribs) is screening my edit history and post every he don't like, I made a seperate page. See User talk:Sander.v.Ginkel/Fram. Sander.v.Ginkel ( Talk) 10:56, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Sherly Jeudy, already mentioned above: this one seems to have the wrong (or at least a dubious) date of birth as well. Fram ( talk) 14:47, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
And Schmid Charles. That's 3 out of your last 6 article creations. Fram ( talk) 14:51, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi, can you put entries you start up on the various Template:The 100,000 Challenge pages? Perhaps do them in batches if easier!♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:01, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:2014UCIWomenTeams has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
23:03, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:GIW2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
23:04, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:ARW2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
23:05, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
I read a posting between you and Ipigott on WiR about Estonians and am hoping one of you can help. Megalibrarygirl and I have an aviator, who did several firsts, but I can't figure out what her name should be in English. Some sources say she is Estonian, others Russian, and one says Latvian. Yes, I get that Estonia (and Latvia) was part of Russia at various times, but I don't know what to call her or how to spell her name. If she is Estonian, seems likely it would be Ljuba rather than the Russian Lyubov, but given how she wrote her last name, I tend to think we should disregard other spellings and go with what she wrote. Or am I crazy?
Russian Wiki just says Russian empire. [13] The French article uses a Russo-French spelling. Help would be greatly appreciated. User:SusunW ( talk) 02:23, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Name also written as Name2, Name3 and Name4 was a Russian born(?) Estonian aviator.
(Or something like this). To make it even a bit more confusing, during the Cold War Russia was the Soviet Union. Maybe people at Wikipedia:WikiProject Russia can help you better? Thanks, Sander.v.Ginkel ( Talk) 08:49, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:SKI2012riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
00:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 December 3, is considered
bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
The Banner
talk
00:18, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:GPC2012riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
00:42, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:TIB2012riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
10:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:GEW2012riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
10:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
You are creating many cycling team templates, and many get nominated for deletion. You give as reasons "minimize storage space", which is not a valid reason (WMF policy is that we shouldn't worry about storage at all and that that shouldn't come into play when editing) and minimize maintenance. As has been said at the deletion discussions, how much maintenance do 2010 squads need? You say "collect source text used in several articles", but as far as I can see, these are only used on one page (e.g. List of 2010 UCI Women's Teams and riders), so you don't decrease maintenance or storage space and don't really collect anything, you just remove information from the article directly and put it into a template, making it harder for non-veteran editors to edit when needed (which like I said won't be often if ever). I see no benefit at the moment from all these templates. A disadvantage though is that a page like List of 2010 UCI Women's Teams and riders now has many more "edit" links and many unecessary and distracting "view" links inserted into it (and a needless repetition of things like "ages as of January 2010, which you could otherwise have stated only once).
Another disadvantage, as can be seen in that article, is that at the mopment you have the same link to [19] with one description on 21 templates, and another description on 5 other templates. If the squads had been on the page instead of on a template, you would have had one named reference. Now you have to edit either 5 or 21 templates to give them all the same description, which means that your efforts have actually increased the maintenance needed, not decreased.
Please stop creating further such templates until it has been established that they really are beneficial. Fram ( talk) 12:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:TCW2011riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
14:42, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:TIB2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
22:37, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:GPC2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
22:37, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
You have now undone improvements to List of 2011 UCI Women's Teams and riders twice times, each time reintroducing factual errors to the page. No matter if these templates are kept or not, no one is under any obligation to use them. Reverting to an inferior version because it is your version is WP:OWNing a page, which is not allowed. Stop. Fram ( talk) 05:38, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Comparing my last version with your current version [20], it turns out that, as I expected, your claim that "important info was not copied", "you didn't copy all the information", "I had to put the information back manualy" was all a load of crap. On the contrary, you introduced a link to the 2012 Dolmans team on this 2011 teams page. Good grief... Fram ( talk) 10:16, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:GPC2011riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
22:37, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
/* visualisation of redirects and links to disambiguation pages */ .mw-redirect { background-color:#F5DEB3; } .mw-disambig { background-color:#AFEEEE; }
Just stop. This is yet another example of you being disruptive through carelessness. You add links and just hope that they are the correct ones? Really? And you then only correct those that get flagged by disambig bot, and don't bother to check the others? This, again, is really bad editing, but from your reply here seems to be your standard approach. Fram ( talk) 09:43, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Why do you list all these handball players (and many other sporting stubs you create) as "former" players? Without good evidence for such a claim, you better simply not include it. E.g. Mahmoud Hassaballah seems to be still active at the highest level, and many older players may still be active at lower levels. Please don't include things you can't source and haven't checked. Fram ( talk) 13:47, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) ( user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))
Dear Mr Ginkel,
The edit which you have effected on the above page creates an impression which is entirely factually incorrect. Firstly, the image labelled '1823 engraving' is in fact, an approximate ILLUSTRATION of an engraving, which was used to illustrate a discussion of the appearance of the painting at the Louvre in 1814. The illustration appeared in the 'Almanach des Dames' in 1823. The actual engraving, from which the 1823 illustration was derived, and from which the more recent 'copy after' by John Parker obtained a cartoon drawing, was an entirely different work by the well known French engraver - Tavernier. Tavernier's engraving was published in 1819, after having been exhibited in it's own right, in the Louvre exhibition of 1819. As a person who seemingly devotes a great deal of their time to ensuring the accuracy of Wikipedia articles, I feel sure that you wouldn't wish your error to remain in public view for too long. Kindest regards An art lover. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.12.39.176 ( talk) 09:16, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Dear Mr Ginkel, And my apologies to you for assuming that it was a malicious edit! You know how it is with your own areas of specialist interest, one can often wrongly assign 'general knowledge' status to information which is really quite obscure! Yes, the 1819 Tavernier engraving, which was reprinted throughout the 19th century (examples do come up for sale quite regularly) is likely to have been a very accurate monochrome representation of the original, given that it was accepted for exhibition at the Louvre in 1819, only five years after the original painting by Blondel had been exhibited there. The 1823 Delpech illustration for the 'Almanach des Dames' really was a rough approximation, intended principally as a visual reminder to the readership of the painting in question.
I have read john Parker's extensive research summary, connected to the reproduction, which is why, out of courtesy, I reinstated the caption copy 'after blondel' below the image. In his research, Parker both illustrates and explains how he used the Tavernier engraving to make a full sized cartoon drawing. He also went into great detail regarding the research into Blondel's pigments etc, but that's another issue! Yes, please do feel free to use any of this information in any way you think would be of benefit to Wikipedia. Kindest regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.12.39.176 ( talk) 09:57, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 17:20, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 17:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 17:27, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 17:28, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello! Sander.v.Ginkel,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Bradv
17:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
|
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 17:45, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 17:45, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 17:47, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 17:48, 9 December 2016 (UTC)As people on the discussion have said, you are still creating articles without good sources. Please stop now until the discussion is concluded. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 10:42, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Please also stop creating redirects and templates in draft space. These cannot be approved through WP:AFC, and only serve to plug up an already backlogged system. Bradv 17:51, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 17:53, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 21:04, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 21:14, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 21:14, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 21:15, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 21:15, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 21:16, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 21:16, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 21:17, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 21:17, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 21:17, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 21:19, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 21:19, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 21:19, 9 December 2016 (UTC)This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.
ONLY TWO DAYS LEFT TO VOTE
Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .
Khadidra Debesette vs Khadidra Debessette -- Tagishsimon ( talk) 13:37, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
I believe I have now approved all your AFC submissions, except for those which already exist (and you've been notified of those).
Can you please go back through all of them and move the redirects (or tag them for deletion)? There is no point in creating draft redirects, as they just result in doubles as soon as the article gets approved (and there's no way to approve redirects in AFC anyway).
I strongly recommend that we do not go this way in the future (automated submissions to AFC are a bad idea!) However, it is determined at AN/I that this will be the approach, please do not create templates or redirects in draft space. Also, let me know when you submit the articles (and maybe leave a list for me somewhere so I don't have to hunt), and I can approve them without tagging them as biographies and creating redundant defaultsorts and categories.
If there is another AFC reviewer who is going to review them for you instead, let them know of my comments here. Thank you. Bradv 21:26, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Why are you creating {{ UnitedStates-handball-bio-stub}} when {{ US-handball-bio-stub}} already exists and you haven't gone through the appropriate WP:WSS/P process? Stub templates are subject to consensus. There's a project where they're proposed and consensus is gathered to create them. There's no need to create duplicate new templates. ~ Rob13 Talk 07:44, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Barnstar of Diligence |
Hi Sander, I want to continue to lend a voice of support for the important work you are doing creating articles about women in sport. As long as an article meets standards, it has a place in Wikipedia and I'm grateful for your efforts to create it, no matter the size of the article. All of these women are from some city somewhere in the world, and there are girls in those cities looking up to the hometown hero. Some day, someone will come along and will expand those stubs. I don't care if it that's 5 years, 15 years, or 50 years from now, the wiki thumbprint helps assure that the person doesn't get omitted from the history books. I've written a lot of women's bios after finding the woman in old PD sources, and each time, I think, "Good... I found her! If I don't write this article now, then when? If I don't do it, then who will?" Thank you for what you do, and know that I appreciate your efforts. Rosiestep ( talk) 19:06, 14 December 2016 (UTC) |
Hi, the article for William Owen (footballer, born 1862) has 1862 as the year of birth in the title but states 1860 in the actual article. As the creator of the article, can you shed any light on which is the correct date? Kosack ( talk) 19:22, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
You claim that Eugen Mühlberger died in August 1943 without any evidence. What makes you give this date, instead of the date given in the source? Please explain! The Banner talk 19:57, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
With the first two there is nothing wrong with the age. They are all listed with the help of Template:death date and age, and they are all correct. I see also still the age is listed as how old they should be by now. That information is not needed in the articles and I removed it. For the other things, these people only meet WP:NSPORTS because they competed at the Olympics. Almost all of the former Olympians who are created, are created in this way. To create such an article 1 reliable source is enough the start the article with. I tagged the articles as a stub, a definition of a stub is: A stub is an article that, although providing some useful information, is too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject, and that is capable of expansion. But I you find some usefull information about the players with a reference, I invite you to add it to the article. I can explain you also how you could move a draft to the main space after you've screened some. This would be constructive for Wikipedia, and also not someone else has to do the same job as you did again. Or is it that you're only screening my draft looking for some errors to complain about me? Sander.v.Ginkel ( Talk) 09:00, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
I guess the "incomplete" is about the number of appearances for the national team, where you only list the olympic appearances. While this is noted in the infobox, I do think it is a rather poor way of handling this. For e.g. Max Schär, you could have used [21] which lists his olympic results and his statistics with the national team and in competition. Before starting a batch of articles, it would often be better if you looked for better sources, so that at least the basic information is reasonably complete. Now you way too often focus on one (important but small) aspect of a career to build your articles on. Fram ( talk) 09:55, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Please compare: your edit [22], my edit [23]. When you edit these articles, please check that the basics (like year of birth) are the same as in the source. While these dates have little real importance for long-dead people, they are of major importance for sporters, and may have real-life implications. Fram ( talk) 10:19, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
When you are changing links, e.g. at Ursula Lohn, who do you keep the less useful team link instead of using the individual player link? [24] Has all the info of the link you use, plus some more. Of course, a link that actually referenced the line it is following ("On club level she plays for TuS Ahrbach in Germany") would be even better. Fram ( talk) 10:50, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
A link like [25] would be really useful for the reader, and for the next editor willing to expand such a stub. Fram ( talk) 10:52, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
I would accept your Drafts but they need better sources than the sole SportsReference. SwisterTwister talk 19:47, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:12, 17 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:15, 17 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:23, 17 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:23, 17 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:24, 17 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:27, 17 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:28, 17 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:29, 17 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:30, 17 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:32, 17 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 22:12, 17 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 22:18, 17 December 2016 (UTC)I did some uploading, may be you like it [26] :) -- Nicola ( talk) 15:27, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eugen Mühlberger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eugen Mühlberger until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 13:32, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:14, 17 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:16, 17 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:22, 17 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:24, 17 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:25, 17 December 2016 (UTC)May I suggest that you start merging all outdated cycling squad templates with the relevant year articles, like List of 2010 UCI Women's Teams and riders for women squads out of 2010? The Banner talk 19:24, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:2016OlympicCyclingSchedule has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Frietjes (
talk)
18:14, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar of deep recognition for all your efforts on Women in Red throughout the year. Enjoy the end of year festivities and prepare to put more women on the world map in 2017. -- Ipigott ( talk) 09:03, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
You did a lot of damage to yourself with your "Proposal 4". I am hesitant about voting about the community ban, but seeing the way you act I must admit that I do not oppose it. You have made a spectacular mess of it and you have blown up your own credibility. It will take quite some time to restore that. Your battleground mentality, finger pointing, WP:IDHT, revenge proposals, following around, lack of quality is now coming back to you as a boomerang.
I will give you one last chance by voting for proposal 2 so you get a chance to show the community that your attitude can change and that the quality of your work can improve. But lie low and do not push your luck. The Banner talk 11:40, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
It was a bit childish, but his frustration is understandable. Fram isn't perfect, I think that was Sander's point. Going to ANI in the first place, expecting sympathy was one of the gravest mistakes to make though as the atmosphere tends to be hostile to content producers and WP:BOOMERANG usually results.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:46, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
There's been a closing of the discussion on AN/I by Avi. The three parts of the close are this:
You can read the entire text of the close, which includes caveats, at the discussion. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 05:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
It is quite disappointing how you react of your boomerang. Let me make it clear: what you did on Template:Bryan was close to vandalism. If you had properly read the template, you could have seen that you were supposed to add the page number when using it.
Stop doing such crap, or you will be back at AN/I soon. The Banner talk 22:07, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Sander. You probably don't know me that well, but I'm an editor in the sports field who has been following your case at ANI. As you know, the case has closed with some restrictions on you in terms of working on BLPs. I understand that this is likely difficult for you, as you are apparently used to working at a high rate of speed, but I admit to being concerned when I see that your first batch of edits after the ANI includes a series of tags added to articles that Fram has worked on. While you may have negative feelings towards them over the ANI, many of the users supporting a block were concerned by your attitude in proposing speedy deletion of all articles that user created. I can't read their minds, but I think they felt that you were trying to deflect attention from issues in your work, even if that wasn't the intention. There is probably going to be a segment of the community that will be keeping close tabs on your work in the near-future, and you need to show them that you are capable of changing and being more careful in your editing. Any edits that can be seen as going after Fram's articles just make it appear that you are trying to retaliate against them for criticizing you, which isn't the look you should be aiming for right now.
What you need to do is take that critical eye and use it in judging your own work. When reviewing articles by others, I often find it much easier to spot problems in their work than in mine, so I understand that this is hard, but it is doable. When editing, take a second before you save to check out what you are doing. Don't blindly trust websites like Wikidata or other Wikipedias, as they are only as good as the users who work there; we can all make mistakes, and any errors there can easily be replicated here if you're not careful. Be especially cautious with sensitive BLP info, such as any allegations or birth date controversies; you might want to avoid those topics for now, as several of us brought that up as a concern. My recommendation is to use your two BLP edits per day fixing issues in your previous work. I believe you mentioned that you were making a list of problematic BLP articles. That is a perfect place to start. If you do some work fixing your previously created articles, that would go a long way towards showing the community that you understand its concerns and want to better yourself and your work. Anyway, this is only my advice and you can take it or leave it. I feel like you've been given a second chance here, and I don't want you to waste it worrying about others' work. Focus on improving your own editing and things will take care of themselves. While I'm here, have a happy holidays. Giants2008 ( Talk) 21:42, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Belarus at the 2016 World Speed Skating Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belarus at the 2016 World Speed Skating Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 02:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Argentina at the 2015 UCI Track Cycling World Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argentina at the 2015 UCI Track Cycling World Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 02:44, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Algeria at the 2015 UCI Road World Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algeria at the 2015 UCI Road World Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 02:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Netherlands at the 2014 European Road Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:12, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article France at the 2013 European Road Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:13, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Netherlands at the 2013 European Road Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:13, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Netherlands at the 2013 UEC European Track Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:14, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Ukraine at the 2013 European Road Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:14, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Netherlands at the 2011 UEC European Track Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:14, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Netherlands at the 2012 UEC European Track Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Netherlands at the 2009 European Road Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Sweden at the 2009 European Road Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Netherlands at the 2010 UEC European Track Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Netherlands at the 2008 European Road Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Ukraine at the 2008 European Road Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Netherlands at the 2008 UEC European Track Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Belarus at the 2008 UEC European Track Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Great Britain at the 2008 UEC European Track Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Lithuania at the 2008 UEC European Track Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Netherlands at the 2006 European Road Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Netherlands at the 2007 European Road Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:AGG2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:47, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:HPU2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:ARC2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:LNL2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:CWT2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:SAF2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:VAI2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:TOG2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:KSK2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:MIC2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:GAU2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:USC2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:FUT2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:ESG2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:LTK2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:DKT2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:BPD2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:VLL2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:53, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:LLT2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:53, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:TIB2011riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:55, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:DPZ2011riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:HPU2011riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:NLB2011riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:VAI2011riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:TOG2011riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:MCG2011riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:MIC2011riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:FUT2011riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:GSD2011riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:LTK2011riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:VLL2011riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:VAI2012riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:VLL2012riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:MIC2012riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:MCG2012riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:HPU2012riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:TOG2012riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:DPZ2012riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:TOG2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:SEF2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:MIC2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:MCG2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:LBL2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:LKT2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:RVL2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:BPD2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:FUT2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:VAI2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:VLL2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:VAI2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:VLL2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:SEF2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:LBL2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:LKT2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:FTZ2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:FDA2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:BTC2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:BPD2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:BCT2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:TSC2006riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:NMC2006riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:ALI2006riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:HCT2006riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:18, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:UPT2006riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:18, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:RAC2007riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:19, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:ECC2007riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:19, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:CVA2007riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:19, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:SEM2007riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:19, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:TSC2007riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:19, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:CRW2007riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:20, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:COL2007riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:20, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:TGH2007riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:20, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:FRW2007riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:21, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:WEB2008riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
10:55, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:VBR2008riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
10:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:TLG2008riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
10:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:PRI2008riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
10:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:PAQ2008riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
10:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:EHN2008riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
10:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:TFA2008riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
10:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:FLX2009riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
10:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:PTG2009riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
10:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:DGC2009riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
10:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:BCT2009riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
10:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:MSI2009riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
10:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:VAD2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:RSC2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:MTW2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:FEN2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:01, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:FLF2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:FCL2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:TPW2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:AGG2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:GKS2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:EXG2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:SLT2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:CZT2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:BCF2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:EMF2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:RVL2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
11:30, 23 December 2016 (UTC)I've just gone through the latest batch of edits that have resulted in complaints, and I've seen enough. You need to take a break from editing while everyone assesses the situation, and it doesn't appear you can do that voluntarily. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:30, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Sander, this is the last time I am going to say this. You are one step away from having your editing privileges indefinitely revoked for inability to collaborate with others. You have been a lazy and careless editor causing an enormous amount of work for others to clean up. You are fortunate that most wikipedians are decent folk and that Wikipedia as a project is not interested in punishment but growth. However, when someone exhibits behavior which indicates that collaborative editing will not occur, the project suffers, no matter how prolific a content creator that person may be. Your content creation itself, for that matter, has been of more harm than good. Take this break week to seriously consider whether or not you are an editor whose skills and talents are best suited for the Wikipedia collaborative model. There is no shame in realizing one's talents lie in different areas, we all have unique personalities whose expressions differ. But realize that continuing the behavior you have exhibited this week, let alone over the past, will result in the project taking measures to protect itself which will almost certainly be the indefinite removal of your editing privileges. Happy Holidays and good luck. -- Avi ( talk) 16:11, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:FUT2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Sander.v.Ginkel ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
1) I am not allowed to make >2 edits per day on a BLP articles, but the pages I edited where not on BLP articles.
2) I was blocked for making about 10 edits like
this one. While I had a dispute with user Fram (the creator of the articles) I don't see why those edits are wrong and against guideliness. In my opinion the block was made out of sentiment and not following the rules that have been made.
Sander.v.Ginkel (
Talk)
20:26, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
What The Banner said: Seems like you have been tagging articles substantially edited by Fram in a way that suggests you were engaging in revenge tagging. If these edits were done in good faith one would expect at least several articles - if not most - to not be edited by her (?). It's also not the first time you have retaliated against Fram. Wikipedia is not interested in vendettas and disguising them as good edits doesn't fly. It's probably best if you step away from her and her contributions at all for a while. I also think it's ill advised to ignore the comments on one's own talk page that were posted immediately before you made the appeal. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello Sander. Wikipedia at times can be a particularly gruelling, hostile place. It's easy to get frustrated and before you know it you're blocked. As nobody else has thought of you here's some festive cheer, which I hope will mean something to you. I know you mean well and wanted to help wikipedia with your stubs, which few others seem to acknowledge. I hope there's a way you can learn from this and produce content of greater quality in the future.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:09, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Alejandro Vega requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WWGB ( talk) 01:45, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ukraine at the 2013 European Road Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ukraine at the 2013 European Road Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 02:32, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Netherlands at the 2013 UEC European Track Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Netherlands at the 2013 UEC European Track Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 02:35, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
Greetings! I noticed your progress in creating stub templates, and I see that you've figured out some of the pitfalls of the process thereof. You seem to have good intentions and I would encourage you to check in with the stub sorting project when convenient. There you'll find guidelines on how to format the parts of a stub template and what to do with categories, for example:
These and other stub-related goodies are available at the link given above! Come by any time. Cheers, Her Pegship ( talk) 22:20, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi. If you could somehow flesh out as many of those footballer stubs as you can they can join the main list and be counted!♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:04, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Only today and tomorrow left on Wikipedia:WikiProject England/The West Country Challenge. We need 42 articles to pass 500. If you feel like fleshing out a few articles/ref fixing/cleanup of some articles that would be very welcome!♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:31, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scotland women's national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lee Alexander. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:32, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of weightlifters at the 2003 World Weightlifting Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of weightlifters at the 2003 World Weightlifting Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 19:25, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of weightlifters at the 2007 World Weightlifting Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of weightlifters at the 2007 World Weightlifting Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 19:27, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of weightlifters at the 1999 World Weightlifting Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of weightlifters at the 1999 World Weightlifting Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 19:27, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of weightlifters at the 2006 World Weightlifting Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of weightlifters at the 2006 World Weightlifting Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 19:27, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of weightlifters at the 1998 World Weightlifting Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of weightlifters at the 1998 World Weightlifting Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 19:28, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of weightlifters at the 2010 World Weightlifting Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of weightlifters at the 2010 World Weightlifting Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 19:28, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give
Francois Etoundi a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "
cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the
page history, which is
legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Dl2000 ( talk) 00:27, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:44, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
|
Thank you for adding so many female athlete bios in under-represented sports In ictu oculi ( talk) 15:50, 16 September 2016 (UTC) |
The previous title's Archive Talk:List of professional cyclists who died during a race/Archive 1 is now orphaned, could you please move it as well & fix any other archiving issues? Thanks, Shearonink ( talk) 00:18, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:54, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of weightlifters at the 2011 World Weightlifting Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of weightlifters at the 2011 World Weightlifting Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 19:28, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mónica Carrió, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alzira. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:55, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for starting Khadijah Hunter page. I did a little bit of expanding but I feel you should try adding some more content if you can find. Thank you! :) Jim Carter 15:06, 28 September 2016 (UTC) |
Hi, thanks for creating the lot of Bosnia and Herzegovina national sitting volleyball team players profile pages (like Safet Alibašić the one you created, and others). Help me dig up Sydney 2000 Paralympics results in sitting volleyball. I need the exact scores in each set. if not too much problem. I can not dig up any source. Keep up the good work. BiHVolim ( talk) 14:48, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
You are cordially welcome to join us in this discussion about the new intricate Filipino Nav box. -- Osplace 16:13, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Of late you have been creating a hoard of articles on weightlifters-who all share a common point-"participation in the 1999 world championships".You seem to provide very less data except that one particular info.Thus it would be kind of you to explain whether simple participation in a world championship suffices an encycloepadic entry for any person !!!!! Aru@baska ❯❯❯ Vanguard 12:08, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Hey. I've been adding wikiproject boxes to your talk pages for the new articles you've been making for female weightlifters. Just to let you know I'm heading off for the day so i won't be getting any more of them done. Its pretty much a copy paste job if you don't mind doing it yourself to save someone the time of tracking them down later. Insert CleverPhrase Here 12:56, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
According to Template:Infobox volleyball biography the number parameter is for the current club, not the national team. Thank you. -- Osplace 13:50, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:11, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Tayler Sanders. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Tyler Sanders. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Tyler Sanders – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Theo649 ( talk) 19:27, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
You put the category on the main space of new articles, please could you also back that up with minimally WP Biography|living=yes on the talk page at least, thanks JarrahTree 15:01, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Please note that in the past WP:BLP has been a serious issue, and any help in adding the requisite items is always appreciated JarrahTree 01:25, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi. You created the redirect Maria Fernanda Alvarez Zapata which goes to María Álvarez. María Álvarez is a Paralympic track athlete not a weightlifter. There doesn't seem to be an article on weightlifter. Tassedethe ( talk) 15:39, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Template:UHC2016riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
22:20, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Template:TPO2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
22:21, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Template:TIB2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
22:21, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Template:PAC2016riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
22:21, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Template:OPW2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
22:21, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Template:OGE2016riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
22:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Template:GPC2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
22:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Template:GPC2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
22:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Template:DNA2016riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
22:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello Sander.v.Ginkel,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Faitoga Togagae for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Xx236 ( talk) 13:14, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi, stubs are welcome for Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge. Some of your recent ones look like decent starts. Feel free to contribute! Asia needs to get off to a good start.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:03, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:05, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Template:FEN2005riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Primefac (
talk)
03:19, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Fixing the bias of History |
16% women on Wikipedia - We need to fix that and you are making a great contribution. You may have heard that the WiR wikiproject is a finalist for a UN-Women award - for this kind of work. A sample of your stubs are being tweeted at #wikiwomeninred. Thank you (on behalf of our g.daughters) for your efforts. Victuallers ( talk) 12:00, 22 October 2016 (UTC) |
![]() |
Moves like Kim Little Barnstar | |
As a recipient of the Kim Little barnstar, we'd like to thank you for make amazing Kim Little-like contributions to articles related to women's football (soccer) and WP:WOSO. Thank you for your diligent work! |
@ Hmlarson:, thanks a lot for this!! I saw the women's football players are under represented on Wikipedia. I started with the players at the world championships. But also the players who competed at other major international competitions are notable. So, it's just the beginning and will create many many more! Sander.v.Ginkel ( Talk) 07:53, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Two of yours; Lucie Záleská v. Lucie Hochmann ... same person? Fancy merging them? thanks
Also - have not checked if they're yours, but probably... Elizabeth Newell versus Elizabeth Hernandez (cyclist).
Finally Marta Pavlisová versus Marta Kroutilová. If you fancy doing anything with these three pairs, that'd be great. thanks -- Tagishsimon (talk) 18:35, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
G'day again, I have just fixed a few instances of "a Australian" in articles recently-created by your good self. Cheers YSSYguy ( talk) 02:04, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi! You added a small batch of Norwegian female footballers. Perhaps you should not have claimed that these players still play football, seeing as they are verging on age 40. Geschichte ( talk) 18:17, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for starting this list. Browsing through the template at the foot of the article, I noticed the actressess list. I'm going to make a note of that and start work on that one. Lugnuts Precious bodily fluids 19:56, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello Sander.v.Ginkel. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various
deletion criteria.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator.
Administrator note You have been grandfathered to this group based on prior patrolling activity - the technical flag for the group will be added to your account after the next software update. You do not need to apply at
WP:PERM. 20:56, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi, the women stubs count towards Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge, which you're very welcome to contribute to long term, or any of the other regional challenges. Keep up the good work!♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:25, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Esmost. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Văn Thị Thanh, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Є𐌔ⲘО𐌔𐍄 𐍄𐌀ℓК 21:09, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:19, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Tiven2240. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Wim Ernes, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Tiven gonsalves 11:22, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Google translate has almost 100% accuracy to translate Chinese name to English.-- AddisWang ( talk) 15:53, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
The article Siti Noor Halimi Hussain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. —
Yellow Dingo
(talk)
21:57, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
The article Nur Izzati Khairudin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. —
Yellow Dingo
(talk)
21:58, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
The article Farahiyah Ridzuan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. —
Yellow Dingo
(talk)
21:59, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Template:XSL2015riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Frietjes (
talk)
14:10, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Could you please fix Water polo at the 2007 World Aquatics Championships – Men's team rosters. It has links to 24 different disambiguation pages. The Banner talk 09:08, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
The article Sam Henderson (weightlifter) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The article creator is encouraged to peruse the linked guidelines and if additional sources exist that may lend themselves to establishing encyclopedic notability, please add them.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
16:53, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sam Henderson (weightlifter) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Henderson (weightlifter) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ad Orientem ( talk) 17:01, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Per MOS:OPENPARA#Birth date and place: "Birth and death places, if known, should be mentioned in the body of the article, and can be in the lead if relevant to the person's notability, but they should not be mentioned in the opening brackets of the lead sentence alongside the birth and death dates." – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 20:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heleri Saar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heleri Saar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 14:20, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Geit Prants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geit Prants until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 14:27, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Sander.v.Ginkel. Thanks again for your work in generating stub articles on women's footballers. Do you know of a way to automate tagging their talk pages with the Women's football taskforce? e.g., {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes|class=stub}} Hmlarson ( talk) 04:59, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello Sander.v.Ginkel.
Based on the patrols you made of new pages during a qualifying period in 2016, your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed.
New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Could you please change the name of the source ""2016–17 UCI Track Cycling World Cup (Glasgow) Enty List Men" and ""2016–17 UCI Track Cycling World Cup (Glasgow) Enty List Women"? Enty should be Entry. By the way, that source does not cover the type of race... The Banner talk 19:17, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Good morning, can you do me a favour, please? I am not really used to the English WP. Conords name is "Charlie", because he is French and not English. In Apeldoorn I asked him and he told me that "Charly" is wrong. -- Nicola ( talk) 09:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Grateful if you'd bring your full arsenal of obscure facts together to examine:
thanks :) -- Tagishsimon (talk) 18:35, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Sander.v.Ginkel. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove courtesy blanking from AFDs. It is only done when there are good reasons to do so, which may not be apparent to you from on-wiki discussions. Thanks. P.S. Your userpage looks like a WP:FAKEARTICLE. Could you please remove the lenghty content about your academic background per WP:USERBIO. SmartSE ( talk) 13:29, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, can you find a way to update the list here with flags for as many countries as possible?♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:48, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new Monitoring the system section in the tutorial.
With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation.
Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 09:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC) .
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Shyamala Shetty, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PageImp ( talk) 10:56, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Best Sander,
please crop the black margin before uploading.-- Recent contributor ( talk) 10:36, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Sander, here are some more photos: [2]. I read that you were born in Woerden. I was there once many years ago to make an interview with Arie van Vliet :) -- Nicola ( talk) 19:47, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, since Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Asian Month is semi-protected now, I post the following; you requested to put Asian characters romanized, and here they are. I'm not a native Chinese, but since Japanese share the same writing system (but we use traditional Chinese characters), I thought I could give you a hand.
BTW, would you mind to test Google translate or Wikipedia translation, by copy/paste a name and see what they give output? Most of the following, I used Google translate; by copy/paste names into the left box (Google translate), it shows below the box in gray the pronunciation. Hope those below will help you.
Nation / Name / simplified character = romanized / traditional character / $ ( zh:中国国家女子足球队#中國女足23人名单:)
-- Omotecho ( talk) 06:09, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
A link to a disambiguation, wrong. Xx236 ( talk) 13:10, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
No interwiki. Xx236 ( talk) 12:47, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
I undid your change. I can't find it in me to like the parentheses around sprinters, and around the whole list, in your version. The logic of the existing version was to start with Sportswomen, as a kind of list header which coincidently is a list name, and then show all of the sports in alpha order. With no parentheses, and certainly not with two levels of nested parentheses. "All are sportswomen and Sprinters are Athletes" may well be the case, but "you've made the list ugly for no tangible gain" is as easy to argue :) -- Tagishsimon ( talk) 06:10, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
As Fram ( talk · contribs) is screening my edit history and post every he don't like, I made a seperate page. See User talk:Sander.v.Ginkel/Fram. Sander.v.Ginkel ( Talk) 10:56, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Sherly Jeudy, already mentioned above: this one seems to have the wrong (or at least a dubious) date of birth as well. Fram ( talk) 14:47, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
And Schmid Charles. That's 3 out of your last 6 article creations. Fram ( talk) 14:51, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi, can you put entries you start up on the various Template:The 100,000 Challenge pages? Perhaps do them in batches if easier!♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:01, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:2014UCIWomenTeams has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
23:03, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:GIW2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
23:04, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:ARW2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
23:05, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
I read a posting between you and Ipigott on WiR about Estonians and am hoping one of you can help. Megalibrarygirl and I have an aviator, who did several firsts, but I can't figure out what her name should be in English. Some sources say she is Estonian, others Russian, and one says Latvian. Yes, I get that Estonia (and Latvia) was part of Russia at various times, but I don't know what to call her or how to spell her name. If she is Estonian, seems likely it would be Ljuba rather than the Russian Lyubov, but given how she wrote her last name, I tend to think we should disregard other spellings and go with what she wrote. Or am I crazy?
Russian Wiki just says Russian empire. [13] The French article uses a Russo-French spelling. Help would be greatly appreciated. User:SusunW ( talk) 02:23, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Name also written as Name2, Name3 and Name4 was a Russian born(?) Estonian aviator.
(Or something like this). To make it even a bit more confusing, during the Cold War Russia was the Soviet Union. Maybe people at Wikipedia:WikiProject Russia can help you better? Thanks, Sander.v.Ginkel ( Talk) 08:49, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:SKI2012riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
00:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 December 3, is considered
bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
The Banner
talk
00:18, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:GPC2012riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
00:42, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:TIB2012riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
10:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:GEW2012riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
10:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
You are creating many cycling team templates, and many get nominated for deletion. You give as reasons "minimize storage space", which is not a valid reason (WMF policy is that we shouldn't worry about storage at all and that that shouldn't come into play when editing) and minimize maintenance. As has been said at the deletion discussions, how much maintenance do 2010 squads need? You say "collect source text used in several articles", but as far as I can see, these are only used on one page (e.g. List of 2010 UCI Women's Teams and riders), so you don't decrease maintenance or storage space and don't really collect anything, you just remove information from the article directly and put it into a template, making it harder for non-veteran editors to edit when needed (which like I said won't be often if ever). I see no benefit at the moment from all these templates. A disadvantage though is that a page like List of 2010 UCI Women's Teams and riders now has many more "edit" links and many unecessary and distracting "view" links inserted into it (and a needless repetition of things like "ages as of January 2010, which you could otherwise have stated only once).
Another disadvantage, as can be seen in that article, is that at the mopment you have the same link to [19] with one description on 21 templates, and another description on 5 other templates. If the squads had been on the page instead of on a template, you would have had one named reference. Now you have to edit either 5 or 21 templates to give them all the same description, which means that your efforts have actually increased the maintenance needed, not decreased.
Please stop creating further such templates until it has been established that they really are beneficial. Fram ( talk) 12:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:TCW2011riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
14:42, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:TIB2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
22:37, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:GPC2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
22:37, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
You have now undone improvements to List of 2011 UCI Women's Teams and riders twice times, each time reintroducing factual errors to the page. No matter if these templates are kept or not, no one is under any obligation to use them. Reverting to an inferior version because it is your version is WP:OWNing a page, which is not allowed. Stop. Fram ( talk) 05:38, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Comparing my last version with your current version [20], it turns out that, as I expected, your claim that "important info was not copied", "you didn't copy all the information", "I had to put the information back manualy" was all a load of crap. On the contrary, you introduced a link to the 2012 Dolmans team on this 2011 teams page. Good grief... Fram ( talk) 10:16, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:GPC2011riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
22:37, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
/* visualisation of redirects and links to disambiguation pages */ .mw-redirect { background-color:#F5DEB3; } .mw-disambig { background-color:#AFEEEE; }
Just stop. This is yet another example of you being disruptive through carelessness. You add links and just hope that they are the correct ones? Really? And you then only correct those that get flagged by disambig bot, and don't bother to check the others? This, again, is really bad editing, but from your reply here seems to be your standard approach. Fram ( talk) 09:43, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Why do you list all these handball players (and many other sporting stubs you create) as "former" players? Without good evidence for such a claim, you better simply not include it. E.g. Mahmoud Hassaballah seems to be still active at the highest level, and many older players may still be active at lower levels. Please don't include things you can't source and haven't checked. Fram ( talk) 13:47, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) ( user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))
Dear Mr Ginkel,
The edit which you have effected on the above page creates an impression which is entirely factually incorrect. Firstly, the image labelled '1823 engraving' is in fact, an approximate ILLUSTRATION of an engraving, which was used to illustrate a discussion of the appearance of the painting at the Louvre in 1814. The illustration appeared in the 'Almanach des Dames' in 1823. The actual engraving, from which the 1823 illustration was derived, and from which the more recent 'copy after' by John Parker obtained a cartoon drawing, was an entirely different work by the well known French engraver - Tavernier. Tavernier's engraving was published in 1819, after having been exhibited in it's own right, in the Louvre exhibition of 1819. As a person who seemingly devotes a great deal of their time to ensuring the accuracy of Wikipedia articles, I feel sure that you wouldn't wish your error to remain in public view for too long. Kindest regards An art lover. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.12.39.176 ( talk) 09:16, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Dear Mr Ginkel, And my apologies to you for assuming that it was a malicious edit! You know how it is with your own areas of specialist interest, one can often wrongly assign 'general knowledge' status to information which is really quite obscure! Yes, the 1819 Tavernier engraving, which was reprinted throughout the 19th century (examples do come up for sale quite regularly) is likely to have been a very accurate monochrome representation of the original, given that it was accepted for exhibition at the Louvre in 1819, only five years after the original painting by Blondel had been exhibited there. The 1823 Delpech illustration for the 'Almanach des Dames' really was a rough approximation, intended principally as a visual reminder to the readership of the painting in question.
I have read john Parker's extensive research summary, connected to the reproduction, which is why, out of courtesy, I reinstated the caption copy 'after blondel' below the image. In his research, Parker both illustrates and explains how he used the Tavernier engraving to make a full sized cartoon drawing. He also went into great detail regarding the research into Blondel's pigments etc, but that's another issue! Yes, please do feel free to use any of this information in any way you think would be of benefit to Wikipedia. Kindest regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.12.39.176 ( talk) 09:57, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 17:20, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 17:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 17:27, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 17:28, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello! Sander.v.Ginkel,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Bradv
17:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
|
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 17:45, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 17:45, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 17:47, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 17:48, 9 December 2016 (UTC)As people on the discussion have said, you are still creating articles without good sources. Please stop now until the discussion is concluded. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 10:42, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Please also stop creating redirects and templates in draft space. These cannot be approved through WP:AFC, and only serve to plug up an already backlogged system. Bradv 17:51, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 17:53, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 21:04, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 21:14, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 21:14, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 21:15, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 21:15, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 21:16, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 21:16, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 21:17, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 21:17, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 21:17, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 21:19, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 21:19, 9 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bradv 21:19, 9 December 2016 (UTC)This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.
ONLY TWO DAYS LEFT TO VOTE
Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .
Khadidra Debesette vs Khadidra Debessette -- Tagishsimon ( talk) 13:37, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
I believe I have now approved all your AFC submissions, except for those which already exist (and you've been notified of those).
Can you please go back through all of them and move the redirects (or tag them for deletion)? There is no point in creating draft redirects, as they just result in doubles as soon as the article gets approved (and there's no way to approve redirects in AFC anyway).
I strongly recommend that we do not go this way in the future (automated submissions to AFC are a bad idea!) However, it is determined at AN/I that this will be the approach, please do not create templates or redirects in draft space. Also, let me know when you submit the articles (and maybe leave a list for me somewhere so I don't have to hunt), and I can approve them without tagging them as biographies and creating redundant defaultsorts and categories.
If there is another AFC reviewer who is going to review them for you instead, let them know of my comments here. Thank you. Bradv 21:26, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Why are you creating {{ UnitedStates-handball-bio-stub}} when {{ US-handball-bio-stub}} already exists and you haven't gone through the appropriate WP:WSS/P process? Stub templates are subject to consensus. There's a project where they're proposed and consensus is gathered to create them. There's no need to create duplicate new templates. ~ Rob13 Talk 07:44, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Barnstar of Diligence |
Hi Sander, I want to continue to lend a voice of support for the important work you are doing creating articles about women in sport. As long as an article meets standards, it has a place in Wikipedia and I'm grateful for your efforts to create it, no matter the size of the article. All of these women are from some city somewhere in the world, and there are girls in those cities looking up to the hometown hero. Some day, someone will come along and will expand those stubs. I don't care if it that's 5 years, 15 years, or 50 years from now, the wiki thumbprint helps assure that the person doesn't get omitted from the history books. I've written a lot of women's bios after finding the woman in old PD sources, and each time, I think, "Good... I found her! If I don't write this article now, then when? If I don't do it, then who will?" Thank you for what you do, and know that I appreciate your efforts. Rosiestep ( talk) 19:06, 14 December 2016 (UTC) |
Hi, the article for William Owen (footballer, born 1862) has 1862 as the year of birth in the title but states 1860 in the actual article. As the creator of the article, can you shed any light on which is the correct date? Kosack ( talk) 19:22, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
You claim that Eugen Mühlberger died in August 1943 without any evidence. What makes you give this date, instead of the date given in the source? Please explain! The Banner talk 19:57, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
With the first two there is nothing wrong with the age. They are all listed with the help of Template:death date and age, and they are all correct. I see also still the age is listed as how old they should be by now. That information is not needed in the articles and I removed it. For the other things, these people only meet WP:NSPORTS because they competed at the Olympics. Almost all of the former Olympians who are created, are created in this way. To create such an article 1 reliable source is enough the start the article with. I tagged the articles as a stub, a definition of a stub is: A stub is an article that, although providing some useful information, is too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject, and that is capable of expansion. But I you find some usefull information about the players with a reference, I invite you to add it to the article. I can explain you also how you could move a draft to the main space after you've screened some. This would be constructive for Wikipedia, and also not someone else has to do the same job as you did again. Or is it that you're only screening my draft looking for some errors to complain about me? Sander.v.Ginkel ( Talk) 09:00, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
I guess the "incomplete" is about the number of appearances for the national team, where you only list the olympic appearances. While this is noted in the infobox, I do think it is a rather poor way of handling this. For e.g. Max Schär, you could have used [21] which lists his olympic results and his statistics with the national team and in competition. Before starting a batch of articles, it would often be better if you looked for better sources, so that at least the basic information is reasonably complete. Now you way too often focus on one (important but small) aspect of a career to build your articles on. Fram ( talk) 09:55, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Please compare: your edit [22], my edit [23]. When you edit these articles, please check that the basics (like year of birth) are the same as in the source. While these dates have little real importance for long-dead people, they are of major importance for sporters, and may have real-life implications. Fram ( talk) 10:19, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
When you are changing links, e.g. at Ursula Lohn, who do you keep the less useful team link instead of using the individual player link? [24] Has all the info of the link you use, plus some more. Of course, a link that actually referenced the line it is following ("On club level she plays for TuS Ahrbach in Germany") would be even better. Fram ( talk) 10:50, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
A link like [25] would be really useful for the reader, and for the next editor willing to expand such a stub. Fram ( talk) 10:52, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
I would accept your Drafts but they need better sources than the sole SportsReference. SwisterTwister talk 19:47, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:12, 17 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:15, 17 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:23, 17 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:23, 17 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:24, 17 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:27, 17 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:28, 17 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:29, 17 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:30, 17 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:32, 17 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 22:12, 17 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 22:18, 17 December 2016 (UTC)I did some uploading, may be you like it [26] :) -- Nicola ( talk) 15:27, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eugen Mühlberger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eugen Mühlberger until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 13:32, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:14, 17 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:16, 17 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:22, 17 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:24, 17 December 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 20:25, 17 December 2016 (UTC)May I suggest that you start merging all outdated cycling squad templates with the relevant year articles, like List of 2010 UCI Women's Teams and riders for women squads out of 2010? The Banner talk 19:24, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:2016OlympicCyclingSchedule has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Frietjes (
talk)
18:14, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar of deep recognition for all your efforts on Women in Red throughout the year. Enjoy the end of year festivities and prepare to put more women on the world map in 2017. -- Ipigott ( talk) 09:03, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
You did a lot of damage to yourself with your "Proposal 4". I am hesitant about voting about the community ban, but seeing the way you act I must admit that I do not oppose it. You have made a spectacular mess of it and you have blown up your own credibility. It will take quite some time to restore that. Your battleground mentality, finger pointing, WP:IDHT, revenge proposals, following around, lack of quality is now coming back to you as a boomerang.
I will give you one last chance by voting for proposal 2 so you get a chance to show the community that your attitude can change and that the quality of your work can improve. But lie low and do not push your luck. The Banner talk 11:40, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
It was a bit childish, but his frustration is understandable. Fram isn't perfect, I think that was Sander's point. Going to ANI in the first place, expecting sympathy was one of the gravest mistakes to make though as the atmosphere tends to be hostile to content producers and WP:BOOMERANG usually results.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:46, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
There's been a closing of the discussion on AN/I by Avi. The three parts of the close are this:
You can read the entire text of the close, which includes caveats, at the discussion. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 05:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
It is quite disappointing how you react of your boomerang. Let me make it clear: what you did on Template:Bryan was close to vandalism. If you had properly read the template, you could have seen that you were supposed to add the page number when using it.
Stop doing such crap, or you will be back at AN/I soon. The Banner talk 22:07, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Sander. You probably don't know me that well, but I'm an editor in the sports field who has been following your case at ANI. As you know, the case has closed with some restrictions on you in terms of working on BLPs. I understand that this is likely difficult for you, as you are apparently used to working at a high rate of speed, but I admit to being concerned when I see that your first batch of edits after the ANI includes a series of tags added to articles that Fram has worked on. While you may have negative feelings towards them over the ANI, many of the users supporting a block were concerned by your attitude in proposing speedy deletion of all articles that user created. I can't read their minds, but I think they felt that you were trying to deflect attention from issues in your work, even if that wasn't the intention. There is probably going to be a segment of the community that will be keeping close tabs on your work in the near-future, and you need to show them that you are capable of changing and being more careful in your editing. Any edits that can be seen as going after Fram's articles just make it appear that you are trying to retaliate against them for criticizing you, which isn't the look you should be aiming for right now.
What you need to do is take that critical eye and use it in judging your own work. When reviewing articles by others, I often find it much easier to spot problems in their work than in mine, so I understand that this is hard, but it is doable. When editing, take a second before you save to check out what you are doing. Don't blindly trust websites like Wikidata or other Wikipedias, as they are only as good as the users who work there; we can all make mistakes, and any errors there can easily be replicated here if you're not careful. Be especially cautious with sensitive BLP info, such as any allegations or birth date controversies; you might want to avoid those topics for now, as several of us brought that up as a concern. My recommendation is to use your two BLP edits per day fixing issues in your previous work. I believe you mentioned that you were making a list of problematic BLP articles. That is a perfect place to start. If you do some work fixing your previously created articles, that would go a long way towards showing the community that you understand its concerns and want to better yourself and your work. Anyway, this is only my advice and you can take it or leave it. I feel like you've been given a second chance here, and I don't want you to waste it worrying about others' work. Focus on improving your own editing and things will take care of themselves. While I'm here, have a happy holidays. Giants2008 ( Talk) 21:42, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Belarus at the 2016 World Speed Skating Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belarus at the 2016 World Speed Skating Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 02:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Argentina at the 2015 UCI Track Cycling World Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argentina at the 2015 UCI Track Cycling World Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 02:44, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Algeria at the 2015 UCI Road World Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algeria at the 2015 UCI Road World Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 02:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Netherlands at the 2014 European Road Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:12, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article France at the 2013 European Road Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:13, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Netherlands at the 2013 European Road Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:13, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Netherlands at the 2013 UEC European Track Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:14, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Ukraine at the 2013 European Road Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:14, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Netherlands at the 2011 UEC European Track Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:14, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Netherlands at the 2012 UEC European Track Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Netherlands at the 2009 European Road Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Sweden at the 2009 European Road Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Netherlands at the 2010 UEC European Track Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Netherlands at the 2008 European Road Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Ukraine at the 2008 European Road Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Netherlands at the 2008 UEC European Track Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Belarus at the 2008 UEC European Track Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Great Britain at the 2008 UEC European Track Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Lithuania at the 2008 UEC European Track Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Netherlands at the 2006 European Road Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Netherlands at the 2007 European Road Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk)
03:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:AGG2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:47, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:HPU2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:ARC2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:LNL2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:CWT2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:SAF2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:VAI2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:TOG2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:KSK2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:MIC2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:GAU2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:USC2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:FUT2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:ESG2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:LTK2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:DKT2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:BPD2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:VLL2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:53, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:LLT2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:53, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:TIB2011riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:55, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:DPZ2011riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:HPU2011riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:NLB2011riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:VAI2011riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:TOG2011riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:MCG2011riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:MIC2011riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:FUT2011riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:GSD2011riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:LTK2011riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:VLL2011riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:VAI2012riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:VLL2012riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:MIC2012riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:MCG2012riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:HPU2012riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
03:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:TOG2012riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:DPZ2012riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:TOG2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:SEF2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:MIC2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:MCG2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:LBL2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:LKT2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:RVL2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:BPD2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:FUT2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:VAI2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:VLL2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:VAI2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:VLL2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:SEF2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:LBL2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:LKT2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:FTZ2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:FDA2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:BTC2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:BPD2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:BCT2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:TSC2006riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:NMC2006riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:ALI2006riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:HCT2006riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:18, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:UPT2006riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:18, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:RAC2007riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:19, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:ECC2007riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:19, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:CVA2007riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:19, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:SEM2007riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:19, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:TSC2007riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:19, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:CRW2007riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:20, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:COL2007riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:20, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:TGH2007riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:20, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:FRW2007riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
04:21, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:WEB2008riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
10:55, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:VBR2008riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
10:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:TLG2008riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
10:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:PRI2008riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
10:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:PAQ2008riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
10:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:EHN2008riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
10:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:TFA2008riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
10:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:FLX2009riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
10:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:PTG2009riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
10:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:DGC2009riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
10:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:BCT2009riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
10:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:MSI2009riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
10:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:VAD2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:RSC2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:MTW2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:FEN2010riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:01, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:FLF2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:FCL2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:TPW2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:AGG2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:GKS2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:EXG2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:SLT2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:CZT2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:BCF2013riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:EMF2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:RVL2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
11:30, 23 December 2016 (UTC)I've just gone through the latest batch of edits that have resulted in complaints, and I've seen enough. You need to take a break from editing while everyone assesses the situation, and it doesn't appear you can do that voluntarily. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:30, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Sander, this is the last time I am going to say this. You are one step away from having your editing privileges indefinitely revoked for inability to collaborate with others. You have been a lazy and careless editor causing an enormous amount of work for others to clean up. You are fortunate that most wikipedians are decent folk and that Wikipedia as a project is not interested in punishment but growth. However, when someone exhibits behavior which indicates that collaborative editing will not occur, the project suffers, no matter how prolific a content creator that person may be. Your content creation itself, for that matter, has been of more harm than good. Take this break week to seriously consider whether or not you are an editor whose skills and talents are best suited for the Wikipedia collaborative model. There is no shame in realizing one's talents lie in different areas, we all have unique personalities whose expressions differ. But realize that continuing the behavior you have exhibited this week, let alone over the past, will result in the project taking measures to protect itself which will almost certainly be the indefinite removal of your editing privileges. Happy Holidays and good luck. -- Avi ( talk) 16:11, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:FUT2014riders has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Banner
talk
11:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Sander.v.Ginkel ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
1) I am not allowed to make >2 edits per day on a BLP articles, but the pages I edited where not on BLP articles.
2) I was blocked for making about 10 edits like
this one. While I had a dispute with user Fram (the creator of the articles) I don't see why those edits are wrong and against guideliness. In my opinion the block was made out of sentiment and not following the rules that have been made.
Sander.v.Ginkel (
Talk)
20:26, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
What The Banner said: Seems like you have been tagging articles substantially edited by Fram in a way that suggests you were engaging in revenge tagging. If these edits were done in good faith one would expect at least several articles - if not most - to not be edited by her (?). It's also not the first time you have retaliated against Fram. Wikipedia is not interested in vendettas and disguising them as good edits doesn't fly. It's probably best if you step away from her and her contributions at all for a while. I also think it's ill advised to ignore the comments on one's own talk page that were posted immediately before you made the appeal. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello Sander. Wikipedia at times can be a particularly gruelling, hostile place. It's easy to get frustrated and before you know it you're blocked. As nobody else has thought of you here's some festive cheer, which I hope will mean something to you. I know you mean well and wanted to help wikipedia with your stubs, which few others seem to acknowledge. I hope there's a way you can learn from this and produce content of greater quality in the future.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:09, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Alejandro Vega requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WWGB ( talk) 01:45, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ukraine at the 2013 European Road Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ukraine at the 2013 European Road Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 02:32, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Netherlands at the 2013 UEC European Track Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Netherlands at the 2013 UEC European Track Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 02:35, 27 December 2016 (UTC)