Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:User pages. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 04:22, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
hello. i do not see why my userpage was locked, when an administrator has a penis on his. it seems unfair, and removing my satanic userbox smacks of religious discrimination. i request that you unlock my page kthx. - badmachine 20:01, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Salvio, I've unprotected that page, and with a little luck we can all move on to something more productive. Bm has promised to behave, which is a bonus already. Hope you don't mind.
Rich
Farmbrough,
03:55, 1 May 2012 (UTC).
![]() |
Protector of the mouse award |
Thank you for changing the visibility by hiding content and edit summary details of the disgusting comment off my talk page. Highly appreciated. Wesley ☀ Mouse 11:00, 1 May 2012 (UTC) |
Finally he made his pro debut and pass WP:Footy criteria. I would create a version in my subpage User:matthew_hk/Michelangelo Albertazzi would you mind move it to main namespace as it was protected? Matthew_hk t c 19:07, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Please review the diffs I provide directly above your comment, and then DJSasso's his repudiation of his promises, his explanation for what appears to be wikistalking, and then my refutation of that explanation. Hipocrite ( talk) 20:51, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
When you have a moment, could you please have another word with User:Vyasan. They are becoming increasingly heated at Talk:Nair and for that reason I have just deleted their most recent contribution to what is quite clearly becoming a pointless thread. Sure, the deleted item is not terrible on the PA scale but you have warned them previously and they have had the castewarning thing, so there really is no need for the personal comments etc. I'm off for the weekend - have a good one. - Sitush ( talk) 18:06, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
There have been multiple complaints about User:Sitush but nobody seems to care. He/she has some close friends on wikipedia admins. What chance does a n00b like me stand huh?
Ciao Salvio, ho una domanda. I am very sure there is someone on the English wikipedia who used to edit under a specific name on the German wikipedia. This someone had very strong opinions on Afghanistan-related issues over there but claims to be only interested in technical issues here while still pursueing same methods as on the German wikipedia. Can the CU check across different language wikipedias? JCAla ( talk) 09:37, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
I'm not really sure what you're describing actually warrants a check, much less a cross-wiki one, but, if you wish, you can send me an e-mail and, if I believe a cross-wiki check is warranted, I'll forward it to the checkuser mailing list, if you authorise me. Salvio Let's talk about it! 15:14, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/ChronicalUsual
They have been very active again.
Sopher99 ( talk) 23:17, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
We would like the the Syrian_uprising_(2011-present) page and its talk to be protected, as it is under constant attack by chronical and his socks, not to mention the occasional vandalism by ips.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Syrian_uprising_(2011–present)#RFP_.3F
23:17, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Official website. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 05:16, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
A few months ago you protected Serama, as an IP continuously comes back adding unsourced information, promoting "Mr. Brian Sparks of Wisconsin". A couple of other IPs have edited too, I think from rival US serama groups or something, making edits like this. I think it's probably a good idea to indefinitely semi-protect it, as obviously the building limited semi's haven't worked. I'm surprised all this can occur because of a chook. CMD ( talk) 14:21, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Salvio; I'm asking you and Boing! said Zebedee, as admins who sometimes handle India caste-related issues, to review an edit war at Nambudiri. Two users, one of whom I have a well known on-wiki relationship with, were edit warring. I fully protected the article for 24 hours to stop the edit warring, but it may be that blocks are appropriate (both editors crossed 3RR). While I felt that protecting the article was safe under WP:INVOLVED, I don't think I can make a fair blocking decision. Thanks for your assistance. Qwyrxian ( talk) 14:54, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
I am going to guess that this is a pattern of attack on once so-called forward castes of Kerala. Good work User:Sitush, User:Qwyrxian and User:Boing Zebedee. You are a good team in slandering who communities.
Hi Sal, hows tricks? I created an essay a while ago [1] and have just noticed that essays are meant to be uppercase only, but there is already a redirect with the same name [2] Would it be possible to either delete the old redirect so my essay can be moved there, or merge my poor try at humor to the existing one? Darkness Shines ( talk) 19:22, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
Thanks for your contributions! SwisterTwister talk 22:39, 18 May 2012 (UTC) |
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Blocking policy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 06:16, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
As you closed the SPI before I had a chance to respond (Sleep and whatnot) I wanted to draw your attention to the comment I made after you closed the investigation as the filer of the SPI appeared to be making a WP:POINT violation in using the process. Hasteur ( talk) 14:49, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:User pages. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 04:22, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
hello. i do not see why my userpage was locked, when an administrator has a penis on his. it seems unfair, and removing my satanic userbox smacks of religious discrimination. i request that you unlock my page kthx. - badmachine 20:01, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Salvio, I've unprotected that page, and with a little luck we can all move on to something more productive. Bm has promised to behave, which is a bonus already. Hope you don't mind.
Rich
Farmbrough,
03:55, 1 May 2012 (UTC).
![]() |
Protector of the mouse award |
Thank you for changing the visibility by hiding content and edit summary details of the disgusting comment off my talk page. Highly appreciated. Wesley ☀ Mouse 11:00, 1 May 2012 (UTC) |
Finally he made his pro debut and pass WP:Footy criteria. I would create a version in my subpage User:matthew_hk/Michelangelo Albertazzi would you mind move it to main namespace as it was protected? Matthew_hk t c 19:07, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Please review the diffs I provide directly above your comment, and then DJSasso's his repudiation of his promises, his explanation for what appears to be wikistalking, and then my refutation of that explanation. Hipocrite ( talk) 20:51, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
When you have a moment, could you please have another word with User:Vyasan. They are becoming increasingly heated at Talk:Nair and for that reason I have just deleted their most recent contribution to what is quite clearly becoming a pointless thread. Sure, the deleted item is not terrible on the PA scale but you have warned them previously and they have had the castewarning thing, so there really is no need for the personal comments etc. I'm off for the weekend - have a good one. - Sitush ( talk) 18:06, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
There have been multiple complaints about User:Sitush but nobody seems to care. He/she has some close friends on wikipedia admins. What chance does a n00b like me stand huh?
Ciao Salvio, ho una domanda. I am very sure there is someone on the English wikipedia who used to edit under a specific name on the German wikipedia. This someone had very strong opinions on Afghanistan-related issues over there but claims to be only interested in technical issues here while still pursueing same methods as on the German wikipedia. Can the CU check across different language wikipedias? JCAla ( talk) 09:37, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
I'm not really sure what you're describing actually warrants a check, much less a cross-wiki one, but, if you wish, you can send me an e-mail and, if I believe a cross-wiki check is warranted, I'll forward it to the checkuser mailing list, if you authorise me. Salvio Let's talk about it! 15:14, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/ChronicalUsual
They have been very active again.
Sopher99 ( talk) 23:17, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
We would like the the Syrian_uprising_(2011-present) page and its talk to be protected, as it is under constant attack by chronical and his socks, not to mention the occasional vandalism by ips.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Syrian_uprising_(2011–present)#RFP_.3F
23:17, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Official website. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 05:16, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
A few months ago you protected Serama, as an IP continuously comes back adding unsourced information, promoting "Mr. Brian Sparks of Wisconsin". A couple of other IPs have edited too, I think from rival US serama groups or something, making edits like this. I think it's probably a good idea to indefinitely semi-protect it, as obviously the building limited semi's haven't worked. I'm surprised all this can occur because of a chook. CMD ( talk) 14:21, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Salvio; I'm asking you and Boing! said Zebedee, as admins who sometimes handle India caste-related issues, to review an edit war at Nambudiri. Two users, one of whom I have a well known on-wiki relationship with, were edit warring. I fully protected the article for 24 hours to stop the edit warring, but it may be that blocks are appropriate (both editors crossed 3RR). While I felt that protecting the article was safe under WP:INVOLVED, I don't think I can make a fair blocking decision. Thanks for your assistance. Qwyrxian ( talk) 14:54, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
I am going to guess that this is a pattern of attack on once so-called forward castes of Kerala. Good work User:Sitush, User:Qwyrxian and User:Boing Zebedee. You are a good team in slandering who communities.
Hi Sal, hows tricks? I created an essay a while ago [1] and have just noticed that essays are meant to be uppercase only, but there is already a redirect with the same name [2] Would it be possible to either delete the old redirect so my essay can be moved there, or merge my poor try at humor to the existing one? Darkness Shines ( talk) 19:22, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
Thanks for your contributions! SwisterTwister talk 22:39, 18 May 2012 (UTC) |
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Blocking policy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 06:16, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
As you closed the SPI before I had a chance to respond (Sleep and whatnot) I wanted to draw your attention to the comment I made after you closed the investigation as the filer of the SPI appeared to be making a WP:POINT violation in using the process. Hasteur ( talk) 14:49, 20 May 2012 (UTC)