This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This is the archive of comments added to User talk:Salamurai for Jan 1, 2011 to Dec 31, 2016. - Salamurai ( talk) 08:19, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I wonder if you could suggest what we can do about the situation on the above article regarding deadlinks. I note that in your recent edit you have agreed with me that a link was dead ... but apparently it is not dead for people viewing the site from within India. I am aware that India block access to some non-Indian sites but am struggling to work out why (if?) they are blocking access to their own government sites, as appears to be the case with the link which I tagged as dead and with which comment your recent edit summary agreed.
The Wayback etc archives do not cover this stuff particularly well, which suggests that the issue has existed for some time. I've tried emailing the relevant Indian govt department and have also brought it up on the article talk page. Frankly, even allowing for WP:AGF, this presents something of a problem in my opinion, not least because it is not uncommon for official Indian sources to use WP as the basis for their published knowledge, thus creating a circular reference that no-one outside India can validate! I'm wondering whether to take this to the reliable sources noticeboard but your general thoughts would be appreciated. - Sitush ( talk) 01:10, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
... in the Governorship of Mitt Romney article. I got sloppy when I moved some things there from the Mitt Romney article, and the formatting in the Governorship article has always been half-baked from the beginning ... Wasted Time R ( talk) 11:07, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Was wondering why you said "Wrong kind of dash" with this edit. Page ranges take en dashes, per MOS:DASH and just about every style guide in existence.— Chowbok ☠ 19:52, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
I wish to express thanks for your clean ups on Gospel of the Hebrews. Content editors should be grateful to the small number of format editors like yourself who clean up the mess left by others. I apologise in advance that in the slow process of trying to pull the content of that page back from fringe/enthusiast content I am likely to leave more split hairs. Your forebearance is appreciated. :) In ictu oculi ( talk) 03:05, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I'm contacting you because you are listed as a member of WikiProject G.I. Joe, and I want to inform you that the article on Zartan has been nominated for deletion, in case you may be interested in commenting on the AfD. -- Jake Fuersturm ( talk) 11:36, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi there, I just wanted to thank you for your edit on Raniere's page. I appreciate it! U21980 ( talk) 05:26, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for catching my error! It's been fixed and I appreciate the chance to do it. Petropetro ( talk) 15:13, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Hey Salamurai -- thanks for your help tidying up the references in this article. Unfortunately, they came at a bad time! All the citations to Melton come from a single editor who's very inexperienced with citing his sources and hasn't provided page numbers for any of the claims he cites to Melton. I'm working with him to get those page numbers in there, but compacting the references down right now is only going to confuse him more. I've temporarily split these apart again so that he can get the pages in there, after which I'll show him how to compact them again! cheers -- Rlandmann ( talk) 11:54, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
It appears an IP snuck in there right in the middle of my doing a major cleanup, so thanks for rescuing the footnotes that you did. Any and all help sorting out the mess that is Yadav is most greatly appreciated! MatthewVanitas ( talk) 03:53, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
You have reverted, but 213.160.188.205 is a busy little vandal... Mark Sublette ( talk) 23:02, 29 May 2011 (UTC)Mark Sublette Mark Sublette ( talk) 23:02, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Citation completed as requested; thank you for drawing my attention to it. FeatherPluma ( talk) 00:25, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
for saving that reference in the IVF article! Mikael Häggström ( talk) 13:31, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi there, I saw your edit summary indicating confusion as to why a taxonomy template wouldn't update correctly. Following an edit to one of these templates, it helps to perform a null edit. You can do this by either clicking the "category listings out of date?" link or by clicking Edit and Save Page without making any changes. Bob the WikipediaN ( talk • contribs) 20:09, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
Kindly note that all the info is found on the Georgetown Official Website. I am a former student updating the page of my alma mater. Unfortunately I do not seem capable of including necessary links for reference as it turns into an error each time i do so. Any help would be appreciated in that regard - kindly do not revert back to very old info (From 2008!) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vassilli288 ( talk • contribs) 10:51, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Can you tell me when you've finished your edits as I have just had a big edit conflict while I was trying to move some of the excessively detailed content of the introduction. I'm happy to wait until you've finished, but perhaps you wouldn't mind having a quick check afterwards that my eddits haven't disrupted anything you've been doing. Thanks. Opbeith ( talk) 22:08, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
TY for your "rescue" in ovarian cancer. There has been a lot reverted so please feel free to jump in. I think this is going to get very "interesting' and appreciate the help. Namaste !!!! — DocOfSoc • Talk • 06:54, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
At least SOMEONE was able to correct my goof on Ep. 1&2 of R.L. Stine's The Haunting Hour episodes Tanks Silvershrek ( talk) 00:00, 10 July 2011 (UTC)Silvershrek
Thanks, but the IP editor has the right to blank their talk page and remove earlier warnings. Thank you, Drmies ( talk) 02:32, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello, you contacted me on August 16th regarding the changes I made to the When In Rome trademark dispute. The reason I amended the page was because wiruk added information that has already beed referenced ie. 9,10 and 11. There is no dispute over the bands name for touring as this has been resolved. The UK version are touring as Clive Farrington and Andrew Mann formerly of When In Rome. This is clearly stated in reference 9 and wiruk is aware of this.The user wiruk is Rob Juarez and he is using Wikipedia to elevate his importance in the band. He is a touring member of the band and is not an original member. Musicwerks ( talk) 06:31, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HI_xFQWiYU&ob=av2e You will see in the above link that Clive Farrington and Andrew Mann are the original writer / founder / vocalists for When In Rome. Why was the When In Rome band site not blocked from editing on the truth page that I edited last? It is so ridiculous that an ex member of the band has trademarked the name in order to prevent us from working with a name that we created and founded? However, this trademark is for live purposes only. If we cannot see that I, Clive Farrington is telling the truth, then can I please ask that the false site is taken down completely? This is the only resolve in this very unfair situation. Why would any band for instance list past members? That is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard of unless you are Whitesnake or AC/DC! Because the information in the edit that Wiki has decided to protect is for the most part false, can we please ask for the whole page to be removed? M. Nuttall has been selling his none original version of WIR to the ticket buying public as the original act which we find implorable! Please be assured that we are grown up people and have absolutely no reason to tell anything but the truth... Thank you and please look at the info that's already out there. Many fans are so disappointed that they paid money to see the M. Floreale non original version and in essence were duped... Please be aware that Rob Juarez has nothing to do with the edits, because even he wasn't there in my parents garden shed when we wrote The Promise (all verifiable facts) - Clive Farrington and Andrew Mann - When In Rome — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.242.211.182 ( talk • contribs) 15:54, October 4, 2011 (UTC)
Andrew: “Apart from When in Rome we’ve both been getting on with our lives outside of songwriting. Clive has a 9 year old daughter, Saskia, so he’s been busy! I’ve been doing some acting and I am director of a casting agency in London – It was inevitable that we would again be talking of studios & touring with When in Rome”
Please put {{ stub}} tags at the end of article, after everything except inter-wiki links, as per WP:FOOTERS, not as you did in A. A. Bondy. It saves time for stub-sorters if it's in the right place. Thanks. Pam D 09:03, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Confused by your revert that the Tracklisting template [on Reckoning (R.E.M. album), see edit of today] "smashes" the text - using the template, the text is the same height and width, and makes the tracklist only slightly longer than before (compare old & new in separate tabs). IMO the template "airs out" the list, making it easier to read. - Salamurai ( talk) 07:39, 8 November 2011 (UTC) Columns The track listing template (which you added to Reckoning (R.E.M. album)) has columns of pre-defined width so that long titles will be smashed together to the left--that's why I never use it. If an article has had it for awhile, then I don't take it out, but if an article has gone without it for awhile, I prefer to not add it for that reason. It also doesn't wrap with {{ Infobox album}}, so when an article on an album is short, then it ends up having a huge whitespace where it clears the bottom of that template but still doesn't actually extend any wider. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 15:47, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
(linked policy doesn't specify when to use or not use template)
I'm still not sure if Teresa Pica has died and as of yet there has been no news. I say we can either change it all back to present tense, or wait a few days to see if an obit pops up. I checked the local news and Penn news and haven't seen anything. Feel free to do with it what you will. The Haz talk 18:04, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
PLEASE don't delete this. I don't understand why you would feel the need to remove information about a topic. Leave that information in-tact. There are few places to find that type of information.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.189.145.89 ( talk • contribs) 17:38, November 18, 2011 (UTC)
My understanding of an encyclopedia is that it is a source of information. Why do you want to limit the amount of information available? I was not aware that you had put a note on the article's talk page or I would have responded. I think you should consider that within a few days of your edit that I noticed and had wanted that information. I knew that it was there previously and found the edit history. Wouldn't you then say perhaps that there is interest in this information? As for the source - the game itself would be the source. Some fans either combined resources to gather information about the release or some fortunate person with all the figures and cards entered it. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
24.159.244.27 (
talk •
contribs) 11:17, November 20, 2011
Hello, Salamurai! I wanted to make you aware of something, as I see that you have edited at least one article that our "mutual friend" has. I'm speaking of this edit, that I found while reverting the recent edits of an IP used by a prolific pest dubbed "The Voice Cast Vandal". That section you reverted was created by him, and many of the actors listed are favorite targets of his. He switches IPs constantly and targets a lot of different actors and actresses, but the behavior remains the same. If you encounter similar edits concerning fake cast lists on articles like this, don't hesitate to drop me a line on my talk page! Cheers :> Doc talk 08:09, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello: I see you have been on the supportive living page, and my contribution from earlier today has been erased. Any idea what happened to it? You are the only name entering after on my watchlist. Thanks. I think I saw some discussion on it..I didn't place any of my books on, but I have 3 including "Housing, support and community" (1993) from work nationwide in the US.````Julie Ann Racino — Preceding unsigned comment added by JARacino ( talk • contribs) 01:27, May 10, 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Dusty relic. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Firefly (TV series) that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dusty| 💬| You can help! 13:38, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
The Minor Barnstar | ||
for catching a minor but irritating error in use of See Also on Malaga Island , thanks ElijahBosley (talk ☞) 12:46, 25 September 2012 (UTC) |
Hi;
Thank you for improving some references I recently made. I will study your edit so I can do a better job in the future. Jim Derby ( talk) 18:39, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
The edits reverted by 107.4.229.24 were made public by the FCC, DCRTV.com (a Washington, DC area media website) and VARTV.com (a state-wide media website in Virginia). I expect by Monday, Inside Radio and other national radio business websites will pick it up. But the FCC is the official website for these things and if you can read it, they give information first. They are recognized as a reliable source as they are part of the US Government. Just some FYI there.
That aside, good work on revert the anon. I am going to track down an admin to see about having them blocked for edit warring. Don't worry, that won't effect you since you were reverting vandalism. :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 00:23, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi Salamurai, I'm right in the middle of clearing up the bibliography and removing redundant cite book and other entries. Could you hold off a bit to make any other corrections so we don't have edit conflicts? -- Gwillhickers ( talk) 04:10, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
First of all, thank you so much for streamlining the references on Genie; wiki-syntax and me don't get along very well, to put it mildly. I was wondering; do you have any way of getting them to work like they do on (for instance) Olivia Manning? If you click the book refs on that page, they take you down to the book being cited, and that doesn't seem to be happening on the Genie article. I don't dare screw with the formatting right now, and besides I'd rather spend the time touching up the last few content issues. If you can help, it'd be hugely appreciated, and if not it's really not a huge deal. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい) 20:50, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for fixing up the Slater & Gordon page after my edits. I don't know how to do the in-line citations... Kelvinbridge ( talk) 13:11, 13 February 2013 (UTC) |
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for tidying up after my edits. I am new to this. Kelvinbridge ( talk) 13:12, 13 February 2013 (UTC) |
Hi, sorry for interrupting, I just want to know about the genre problems of two pages: " So What" and " Sober", both are Pink songs. So please resolve.
"So What" is actually a pop rock, pop punk and power pop song, not dance-pop. I don't think it contains dance music influences on it.
"Sober" is actually a pop rock (primary genre) and alternative rock (secondary genre). But it shuffled to alternative rock and pop rock. I think would change back into pop rock and alternative rock, because pop rock is the primary genre, and alternative rock is the secondary genre. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lordofpyrus ( talk • contribs) 14:06, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
Please could you go here and add the photo? http://www.awm.gov.au/collection/P08727.001 Kelvinbridge ( talk) 10:43, 14 February 2013 (UTC) |
(for Slater & Gordon)
Thanks for diving in and helping on this one. I still don't understand why there is any need for this lawsuit stuff to be in the article at all. The opening sentence of that section says "There is no dispute about Princeton's south boundary...". Well if there is no dispute, why do we need a lengthy paragraph dealing with a lawsuit that is over and done with? I just don't get it. Thanks.-- ukexpat ( talk) 01:41, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
Thank you for correcting my mistake on
Been Caught Stealing article! - Myxomatosis57 ( talk) 19:44, 19 February 2013 (UTC) |
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
On Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting, in the past any article marked with "Wikipedia:" never appeared, now there are scads of them. I edited about a dozen, not really thinking about it, but most of them are archives and shouldn't be modified even to remove from the tracking category. Frankly none of these articles ought to be showing up in the Incorrect Ref category in the first place. I expect there was a software update that makes them show up, can something be done to prevent their appearance? Who does that get directed to? Thanks.
-- Salamurai ( talk) 05:13, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John Taylor Gatto may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 23:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Just wanted to let you know that I fixed the appearance of your request so that an administrator can handle the request properly. Amazing how equals signs can break a template like that. Steel1943 ( talk) 03:33, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
An article you contributed to is being considered for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top 100 meter times by NFL players Trackinfo ( talk) 20:42, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
... have looked a bit closer . Cheers - DVdm ( talk) 09:52, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Salamurai. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This is the archive of comments added to User talk:Salamurai for Jan 1, 2011 to Dec 31, 2016. - Salamurai ( talk) 08:19, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I wonder if you could suggest what we can do about the situation on the above article regarding deadlinks. I note that in your recent edit you have agreed with me that a link was dead ... but apparently it is not dead for people viewing the site from within India. I am aware that India block access to some non-Indian sites but am struggling to work out why (if?) they are blocking access to their own government sites, as appears to be the case with the link which I tagged as dead and with which comment your recent edit summary agreed.
The Wayback etc archives do not cover this stuff particularly well, which suggests that the issue has existed for some time. I've tried emailing the relevant Indian govt department and have also brought it up on the article talk page. Frankly, even allowing for WP:AGF, this presents something of a problem in my opinion, not least because it is not uncommon for official Indian sources to use WP as the basis for their published knowledge, thus creating a circular reference that no-one outside India can validate! I'm wondering whether to take this to the reliable sources noticeboard but your general thoughts would be appreciated. - Sitush ( talk) 01:10, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
... in the Governorship of Mitt Romney article. I got sloppy when I moved some things there from the Mitt Romney article, and the formatting in the Governorship article has always been half-baked from the beginning ... Wasted Time R ( talk) 11:07, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Was wondering why you said "Wrong kind of dash" with this edit. Page ranges take en dashes, per MOS:DASH and just about every style guide in existence.— Chowbok ☠ 19:52, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
I wish to express thanks for your clean ups on Gospel of the Hebrews. Content editors should be grateful to the small number of format editors like yourself who clean up the mess left by others. I apologise in advance that in the slow process of trying to pull the content of that page back from fringe/enthusiast content I am likely to leave more split hairs. Your forebearance is appreciated. :) In ictu oculi ( talk) 03:05, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I'm contacting you because you are listed as a member of WikiProject G.I. Joe, and I want to inform you that the article on Zartan has been nominated for deletion, in case you may be interested in commenting on the AfD. -- Jake Fuersturm ( talk) 11:36, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi there, I just wanted to thank you for your edit on Raniere's page. I appreciate it! U21980 ( talk) 05:26, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for catching my error! It's been fixed and I appreciate the chance to do it. Petropetro ( talk) 15:13, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Hey Salamurai -- thanks for your help tidying up the references in this article. Unfortunately, they came at a bad time! All the citations to Melton come from a single editor who's very inexperienced with citing his sources and hasn't provided page numbers for any of the claims he cites to Melton. I'm working with him to get those page numbers in there, but compacting the references down right now is only going to confuse him more. I've temporarily split these apart again so that he can get the pages in there, after which I'll show him how to compact them again! cheers -- Rlandmann ( talk) 11:54, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
It appears an IP snuck in there right in the middle of my doing a major cleanup, so thanks for rescuing the footnotes that you did. Any and all help sorting out the mess that is Yadav is most greatly appreciated! MatthewVanitas ( talk) 03:53, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
You have reverted, but 213.160.188.205 is a busy little vandal... Mark Sublette ( talk) 23:02, 29 May 2011 (UTC)Mark Sublette Mark Sublette ( talk) 23:02, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Citation completed as requested; thank you for drawing my attention to it. FeatherPluma ( talk) 00:25, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
for saving that reference in the IVF article! Mikael Häggström ( talk) 13:31, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi there, I saw your edit summary indicating confusion as to why a taxonomy template wouldn't update correctly. Following an edit to one of these templates, it helps to perform a null edit. You can do this by either clicking the "category listings out of date?" link or by clicking Edit and Save Page without making any changes. Bob the WikipediaN ( talk • contribs) 20:09, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
Kindly note that all the info is found on the Georgetown Official Website. I am a former student updating the page of my alma mater. Unfortunately I do not seem capable of including necessary links for reference as it turns into an error each time i do so. Any help would be appreciated in that regard - kindly do not revert back to very old info (From 2008!) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vassilli288 ( talk • contribs) 10:51, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Can you tell me when you've finished your edits as I have just had a big edit conflict while I was trying to move some of the excessively detailed content of the introduction. I'm happy to wait until you've finished, but perhaps you wouldn't mind having a quick check afterwards that my eddits haven't disrupted anything you've been doing. Thanks. Opbeith ( talk) 22:08, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
TY for your "rescue" in ovarian cancer. There has been a lot reverted so please feel free to jump in. I think this is going to get very "interesting' and appreciate the help. Namaste !!!! — DocOfSoc • Talk • 06:54, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
At least SOMEONE was able to correct my goof on Ep. 1&2 of R.L. Stine's The Haunting Hour episodes Tanks Silvershrek ( talk) 00:00, 10 July 2011 (UTC)Silvershrek
Thanks, but the IP editor has the right to blank their talk page and remove earlier warnings. Thank you, Drmies ( talk) 02:32, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello, you contacted me on August 16th regarding the changes I made to the When In Rome trademark dispute. The reason I amended the page was because wiruk added information that has already beed referenced ie. 9,10 and 11. There is no dispute over the bands name for touring as this has been resolved. The UK version are touring as Clive Farrington and Andrew Mann formerly of When In Rome. This is clearly stated in reference 9 and wiruk is aware of this.The user wiruk is Rob Juarez and he is using Wikipedia to elevate his importance in the band. He is a touring member of the band and is not an original member. Musicwerks ( talk) 06:31, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HI_xFQWiYU&ob=av2e You will see in the above link that Clive Farrington and Andrew Mann are the original writer / founder / vocalists for When In Rome. Why was the When In Rome band site not blocked from editing on the truth page that I edited last? It is so ridiculous that an ex member of the band has trademarked the name in order to prevent us from working with a name that we created and founded? However, this trademark is for live purposes only. If we cannot see that I, Clive Farrington is telling the truth, then can I please ask that the false site is taken down completely? This is the only resolve in this very unfair situation. Why would any band for instance list past members? That is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard of unless you are Whitesnake or AC/DC! Because the information in the edit that Wiki has decided to protect is for the most part false, can we please ask for the whole page to be removed? M. Nuttall has been selling his none original version of WIR to the ticket buying public as the original act which we find implorable! Please be assured that we are grown up people and have absolutely no reason to tell anything but the truth... Thank you and please look at the info that's already out there. Many fans are so disappointed that they paid money to see the M. Floreale non original version and in essence were duped... Please be aware that Rob Juarez has nothing to do with the edits, because even he wasn't there in my parents garden shed when we wrote The Promise (all verifiable facts) - Clive Farrington and Andrew Mann - When In Rome — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.242.211.182 ( talk • contribs) 15:54, October 4, 2011 (UTC)
Andrew: “Apart from When in Rome we’ve both been getting on with our lives outside of songwriting. Clive has a 9 year old daughter, Saskia, so he’s been busy! I’ve been doing some acting and I am director of a casting agency in London – It was inevitable that we would again be talking of studios & touring with When in Rome”
Please put {{ stub}} tags at the end of article, after everything except inter-wiki links, as per WP:FOOTERS, not as you did in A. A. Bondy. It saves time for stub-sorters if it's in the right place. Thanks. Pam D 09:03, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Confused by your revert that the Tracklisting template [on Reckoning (R.E.M. album), see edit of today] "smashes" the text - using the template, the text is the same height and width, and makes the tracklist only slightly longer than before (compare old & new in separate tabs). IMO the template "airs out" the list, making it easier to read. - Salamurai ( talk) 07:39, 8 November 2011 (UTC) Columns The track listing template (which you added to Reckoning (R.E.M. album)) has columns of pre-defined width so that long titles will be smashed together to the left--that's why I never use it. If an article has had it for awhile, then I don't take it out, but if an article has gone without it for awhile, I prefer to not add it for that reason. It also doesn't wrap with {{ Infobox album}}, so when an article on an album is short, then it ends up having a huge whitespace where it clears the bottom of that template but still doesn't actually extend any wider. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 15:47, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
(linked policy doesn't specify when to use or not use template)
I'm still not sure if Teresa Pica has died and as of yet there has been no news. I say we can either change it all back to present tense, or wait a few days to see if an obit pops up. I checked the local news and Penn news and haven't seen anything. Feel free to do with it what you will. The Haz talk 18:04, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
PLEASE don't delete this. I don't understand why you would feel the need to remove information about a topic. Leave that information in-tact. There are few places to find that type of information.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.189.145.89 ( talk • contribs) 17:38, November 18, 2011 (UTC)
My understanding of an encyclopedia is that it is a source of information. Why do you want to limit the amount of information available? I was not aware that you had put a note on the article's talk page or I would have responded. I think you should consider that within a few days of your edit that I noticed and had wanted that information. I knew that it was there previously and found the edit history. Wouldn't you then say perhaps that there is interest in this information? As for the source - the game itself would be the source. Some fans either combined resources to gather information about the release or some fortunate person with all the figures and cards entered it. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
24.159.244.27 (
talk •
contribs) 11:17, November 20, 2011
Hello, Salamurai! I wanted to make you aware of something, as I see that you have edited at least one article that our "mutual friend" has. I'm speaking of this edit, that I found while reverting the recent edits of an IP used by a prolific pest dubbed "The Voice Cast Vandal". That section you reverted was created by him, and many of the actors listed are favorite targets of his. He switches IPs constantly and targets a lot of different actors and actresses, but the behavior remains the same. If you encounter similar edits concerning fake cast lists on articles like this, don't hesitate to drop me a line on my talk page! Cheers :> Doc talk 08:09, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello: I see you have been on the supportive living page, and my contribution from earlier today has been erased. Any idea what happened to it? You are the only name entering after on my watchlist. Thanks. I think I saw some discussion on it..I didn't place any of my books on, but I have 3 including "Housing, support and community" (1993) from work nationwide in the US.````Julie Ann Racino — Preceding unsigned comment added by JARacino ( talk • contribs) 01:27, May 10, 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Dusty relic. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Firefly (TV series) that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dusty| 💬| You can help! 13:38, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
The Minor Barnstar | ||
for catching a minor but irritating error in use of See Also on Malaga Island , thanks ElijahBosley (talk ☞) 12:46, 25 September 2012 (UTC) |
Hi;
Thank you for improving some references I recently made. I will study your edit so I can do a better job in the future. Jim Derby ( talk) 18:39, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
The edits reverted by 107.4.229.24 were made public by the FCC, DCRTV.com (a Washington, DC area media website) and VARTV.com (a state-wide media website in Virginia). I expect by Monday, Inside Radio and other national radio business websites will pick it up. But the FCC is the official website for these things and if you can read it, they give information first. They are recognized as a reliable source as they are part of the US Government. Just some FYI there.
That aside, good work on revert the anon. I am going to track down an admin to see about having them blocked for edit warring. Don't worry, that won't effect you since you were reverting vandalism. :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 00:23, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi Salamurai, I'm right in the middle of clearing up the bibliography and removing redundant cite book and other entries. Could you hold off a bit to make any other corrections so we don't have edit conflicts? -- Gwillhickers ( talk) 04:10, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
First of all, thank you so much for streamlining the references on Genie; wiki-syntax and me don't get along very well, to put it mildly. I was wondering; do you have any way of getting them to work like they do on (for instance) Olivia Manning? If you click the book refs on that page, they take you down to the book being cited, and that doesn't seem to be happening on the Genie article. I don't dare screw with the formatting right now, and besides I'd rather spend the time touching up the last few content issues. If you can help, it'd be hugely appreciated, and if not it's really not a huge deal. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい) 20:50, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for fixing up the Slater & Gordon page after my edits. I don't know how to do the in-line citations... Kelvinbridge ( talk) 13:11, 13 February 2013 (UTC) |
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for tidying up after my edits. I am new to this. Kelvinbridge ( talk) 13:12, 13 February 2013 (UTC) |
Hi, sorry for interrupting, I just want to know about the genre problems of two pages: " So What" and " Sober", both are Pink songs. So please resolve.
"So What" is actually a pop rock, pop punk and power pop song, not dance-pop. I don't think it contains dance music influences on it.
"Sober" is actually a pop rock (primary genre) and alternative rock (secondary genre). But it shuffled to alternative rock and pop rock. I think would change back into pop rock and alternative rock, because pop rock is the primary genre, and alternative rock is the secondary genre. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lordofpyrus ( talk • contribs) 14:06, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
Please could you go here and add the photo? http://www.awm.gov.au/collection/P08727.001 Kelvinbridge ( talk) 10:43, 14 February 2013 (UTC) |
(for Slater & Gordon)
Thanks for diving in and helping on this one. I still don't understand why there is any need for this lawsuit stuff to be in the article at all. The opening sentence of that section says "There is no dispute about Princeton's south boundary...". Well if there is no dispute, why do we need a lengthy paragraph dealing with a lawsuit that is over and done with? I just don't get it. Thanks.-- ukexpat ( talk) 01:41, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
Thank you for correcting my mistake on
Been Caught Stealing article! - Myxomatosis57 ( talk) 19:44, 19 February 2013 (UTC) |
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
On Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting, in the past any article marked with "Wikipedia:" never appeared, now there are scads of them. I edited about a dozen, not really thinking about it, but most of them are archives and shouldn't be modified even to remove from the tracking category. Frankly none of these articles ought to be showing up in the Incorrect Ref category in the first place. I expect there was a software update that makes them show up, can something be done to prevent their appearance? Who does that get directed to? Thanks.
-- Salamurai ( talk) 05:13, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John Taylor Gatto may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 23:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Just wanted to let you know that I fixed the appearance of your request so that an administrator can handle the request properly. Amazing how equals signs can break a template like that. Steel1943 ( talk) 03:33, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
An article you contributed to is being considered for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top 100 meter times by NFL players Trackinfo ( talk) 20:42, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
... have looked a bit closer . Cheers - DVdm ( talk) 09:52, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Salamurai. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |