Please reflect that Kanye is running as a independent with republican ties. An Joe Biden is the primary contender against donald trump.
![]() |
The Afghanistan Barnstar of National Merit | |
For the Creation of " Fall of Kabul (2021)" Randoperson1 ( talk) 05:21, 16 August 2021 (UTC) |
Congratulations Randoperson1 ( talk) 05:21, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi SAMBLAman! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 8 August 2020 (UTC) |
Hello SAMBLAman and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to 2020 United States presidential election, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
I hope you enjoy editing and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~
); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of
my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! —
Tartan357 (
Talk)
07:19, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Please read WP:CRYSTAL. Thanks! TrangaBellam ( talk) 09:30, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
And would this be because it's the FALL of Kabul, rather than the 'Battle of' ?:
https://www.smh.com.au/world/middle-east/taliban-approach-kabuls-outskirts-attack-north-afghan-city-20210814-p58isx.html
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Kabul (2021) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
AINH ( talk) 10:37, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against
naming conventions or
consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some
guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the
test Wikipedia. Thank you.
Gotitbro (
talk)
17:46, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
President of Afghanistan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your
sandbox for that. Thank you. ―
Tartan357
Talk
02:46, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Abdul Ghani Baradar does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a
Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences →
Editing →
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks!
Firestar464 (
talk)
03:57, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
― Tartan357 Talk 02:46, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Clown porn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clown porn. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sdrqaz ( talk) 23:39, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Porm. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Coulrophilia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cosmopolitan.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Category:Coulrophilia has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Crossroads -talk- 07:38, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Template:Coulrophilia has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:31, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
In the article Australia–New Zealand relations, you changed "some time before 1300" to "in waves roughly between 1320 and 1350" even though the linked source explicitly said it was "colonised in the late 13th century." This looks like deliberate mischief, vandalism. Did I miss something there? Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 07:46, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Talk:ZZ Top, you may be
blocked from editing.
I'm not sure what you are trying to achieve with edits
like
these, but consider this an only warning – any more vandalism, and you will be blocked from editing.
SuperMarioMan (
Talk)
23:49, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of flippant, vulgar and titillating proper names until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
( t · c) buidhe 04:57, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Dronebogus ( talk) 13:17, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Jehochman
Talk
14:28, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
SAMBLAman ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
My bad for trashing the filthy rumours aired to the ZZ Top talkpage in that way. Two wrongs don't make a right. Welcome me back. SAMBLAman ( talk) 23:22, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Doesn't really address why you were blocked, and seems rather flippant. — Daniel Case ( talk) 06:40, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Editing for your account has been disabled indefinitely for this edit: 1. You may request unblock by explaining what constructive things you plan to do, and showing that you sincerely understand the need to avoid making similarly offensive edits in the future. Jehochman Talk 14:41, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
User talk:SAMBLAman/clownporn, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:SAMBLAman/clownporn and please be sure to
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
User talk:SAMBLAman/clownporn during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
Dronebogus (
talk)
22:53, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
User:SAMBLAman/dicklist, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:SAMBLAman/dicklist and please be sure to
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
User:SAMBLAman/dicklist during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
Dronebogus (
talk)
22:55, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
The page Draft:List of flippant and titillating proper nouns has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 04:26, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Please reflect that Kanye is running as a independent with republican ties. An Joe Biden is the primary contender against donald trump.
![]() |
The Afghanistan Barnstar of National Merit | |
For the Creation of " Fall of Kabul (2021)" Randoperson1 ( talk) 05:21, 16 August 2021 (UTC) |
Congratulations Randoperson1 ( talk) 05:21, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi SAMBLAman! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 8 August 2020 (UTC) |
Hello SAMBLAman and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to 2020 United States presidential election, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
I hope you enjoy editing and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~
); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of
my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! —
Tartan357 (
Talk)
07:19, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Please read WP:CRYSTAL. Thanks! TrangaBellam ( talk) 09:30, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
And would this be because it's the FALL of Kabul, rather than the 'Battle of' ?:
https://www.smh.com.au/world/middle-east/taliban-approach-kabuls-outskirts-attack-north-afghan-city-20210814-p58isx.html
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Kabul (2021) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
AINH ( talk) 10:37, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against
naming conventions or
consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some
guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the
test Wikipedia. Thank you.
Gotitbro (
talk)
17:46, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
President of Afghanistan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your
sandbox for that. Thank you. ―
Tartan357
Talk
02:46, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Abdul Ghani Baradar does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a
Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences →
Editing →
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks!
Firestar464 (
talk)
03:57, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
― Tartan357 Talk 02:46, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Clown porn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clown porn. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sdrqaz ( talk) 23:39, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Porm. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Coulrophilia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cosmopolitan.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Category:Coulrophilia has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Crossroads -talk- 07:38, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Template:Coulrophilia has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:31, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
In the article Australia–New Zealand relations, you changed "some time before 1300" to "in waves roughly between 1320 and 1350" even though the linked source explicitly said it was "colonised in the late 13th century." This looks like deliberate mischief, vandalism. Did I miss something there? Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 07:46, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Talk:ZZ Top, you may be
blocked from editing.
I'm not sure what you are trying to achieve with edits
like
these, but consider this an only warning – any more vandalism, and you will be blocked from editing.
SuperMarioMan (
Talk)
23:49, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of flippant, vulgar and titillating proper names until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
( t · c) buidhe 04:57, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Dronebogus ( talk) 13:17, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Jehochman
Talk
14:28, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
SAMBLAman ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
My bad for trashing the filthy rumours aired to the ZZ Top talkpage in that way. Two wrongs don't make a right. Welcome me back. SAMBLAman ( talk) 23:22, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Doesn't really address why you were blocked, and seems rather flippant. — Daniel Case ( talk) 06:40, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Editing for your account has been disabled indefinitely for this edit: 1. You may request unblock by explaining what constructive things you plan to do, and showing that you sincerely understand the need to avoid making similarly offensive edits in the future. Jehochman Talk 14:41, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
User talk:SAMBLAman/clownporn, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:SAMBLAman/clownporn and please be sure to
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
User talk:SAMBLAman/clownporn during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
Dronebogus (
talk)
22:53, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
User:SAMBLAman/dicklist, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:SAMBLAman/dicklist and please be sure to
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
User:SAMBLAman/dicklist during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
Dronebogus (
talk)
22:55, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
The page Draft:List of flippant and titillating proper nouns has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 04:26, 30 November 2021 (UTC)