![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
Hi Ryulong. Please undelete me. Firstly I honestly think the decision is wrong:
Secondly the process was flawed:
If you want to re-list we could have a proper AfD debate, but this wasn't it. Many thanks NBeale 23:10, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page. MrMacMan Talk 00:30, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for doing the right thing on that image list. I see you got a lot of fire for it and I hadn't really the stomach to join the fray on ANI at this point, just wanted to let you know I agree with your stance. Let me know if you should need support on other similar cases in the future. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:02, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
What are you doing mass-deleting an entire page full of images without a single day of warning given to even one person? This is completely against all policies. List of Fullmetal Alchemist episodes, List of Planetes episodes, and List of RahXephon media are all Featured-status lists and have a screenshot for every episode; they have have been left alone, so I see no reason why we're suddenly not allowed to imitate the best Wikipedia content. You have no right to go demolishing other people's work without even making an attempt at the correct procedures. -- Masamage ♫ 15:45, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Also: I have reverted the article back to its former state, though it leaves tons of blank links. You removed dozens of articles summeries. If you want to do something... Do it right. so go back and remove them with out removeing our other content. Lego3400: The Sage of Time 23:49, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Most of them were left untouched but somehow Image:SailorMoonEpisode172.JPG, which was also being used to Show the child form of that charcter on the Page about her Villen Group. Could that one be undeleated its use there is not a subject of controversy? Lego3400: The Sage of Time 15:36, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi, A checkuser IP Check case you filled has been completed by a CheckUser, and archived. You can find the results for 7 days at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/IP check/Archive. -- lucasbfr talk, checkuser clerk, 17:31, 1 May 2007 (UTC).
Just wanted to let you know I modified your block of the IP that identified as a banned user. His MO is to disconnect and reconnect from another IP, blocking his current IP for longer than a few hours serves only to inconvenience another user that is assigned that address. Rockpocke t 00:39, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Okay, I've obviously stepped on the wrong toes with trying to delete the redirect. Who did I piss off, and what makes that redirect so special that it shouldn't be deleted? -- Mhking 02:18, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello Ryulong, there's a small problem I'd like you to check up your records on. Before logging on tonight I paid a quick visit to en.wikipedia without logging in, being in two minds whether to do any work or not. Imagine my surprise when I found my IP (or rather the range my IP's in) has been blocked by you. As you can see I'm a registered user and have had no problems logging in. I can assure you I've done nothing to warrant a blocking. As well as being a fairly regular contributor here I'm a sysop on cy.wikipedia (under another name - hoping to dodge any vandals with a grudge!). Fine, I can still get here and edit, but I'm puzzled and a bit worried for fear I might find my account blocked the next time. By the way, there are no contributions recorded for the blocked IP address (88.111.169.225). If you could shed some light on this I'd be grateful. Best wishes, Enaidmawr 20:29, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Just had to vent out... the discussion was too long for me to add my input but you can guess I am for screenshots in episode lists. I rarely make comments like that which you can validate through my good edit history. What is the gist anyway with screenshots? >_> Berserkerz Crit 09:40, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
The history tab shows nothing suspicious... Grue 10:38, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
TheN0ble2 ( talk · contribs) submitted an unblock request (mailing list) apologizing for his actions at Hd dvd key. I think it was a good-faith attempt at an article, and I would like to unblock the user with a warning about reading policy for future reference. Thanks, Nishkid64 ( talk) 14:33, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
You blocked LOrdSteiN ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) as a SPA, and they are currently requesting to be unblocked. I agree that they clearly are an SPA, but that in and of itself is not a sufficient reason for a block. Their edits, while clearly POV were not really spam and they received no warnings about 3RR or POV-pushing. I think they should be unblocked but cautioned over POV-pushing and verifiability. What are your thoughts? —dgies t c 16:17, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost article I'm working on for Monday is about the non-free image debate. As a major contributor to the debate, I mentioned you in the article, which is here: User:Phoenix2/FL fair use. Feel free to change, add, or remove any information you see fit. -- Phoenix ( talk) 23:13, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Quite possibly - it wasn't my comment that was originally supposed to be struck out, but he forgot to close the striek tags so mne got struck out too. Viridae Talk 00:01, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Hey, i'm kinda new here, so I was wondering why the One Piece page I made to edit was deleted. Roselia92
IP-based editors keep making changes to the voice actors for the monsters for MMPRS1-2. Naturally, none of their stuff is sourced, as sourcing any monster actors from that time is pretty much impossible. Just an FYI. JPG-GR 20:27, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello. I just saw the delete log and saw you deleted the Emily (Band) article. As you can probably see, the article has been recreated. Please excuse me if I am wrong, since it is the first time I see the deletion log. Yours truly, Boricuaeddie Talk • Contribs • Spread the love! 00:44, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Would you mind commenting here? Aaron Bowen 07:31, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Violent-kun ( talk · contribs) has seriously fudged the category up by putting redirects in this category. Since you're the leet administrator, could you rollback most of that user's edits to remove the categories? This will work for most characters except for created pages - this user also created most of the Operation Overdrive character redirects, so there's nothing to revert to, and only mnaul removal will do it for those pages. hbdragon88 07:33, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Looks like you rollbacked most of Violdnet-kun's redirect changes in the three minutes between the post and my response. Thanks. hbdragon88 07:56, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Ryulong, what you there was wrong. Ma-hi-ya-sqa is not a word in our language, it's a phonetic equivalent, and in this case given the subject, it's wrong. This redirect needs to be removed. I corrected the site links into the article, and I fail to understand why that link canot be submitted as an Afd. What do you suggest be done here? Jeffrey Vernon Merkey 07:38, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Ryulong. May I ask why you deleted LionheartX' userpage? The reason is not apparent in the deletion log. Since he's not banned or indefinitely blocked (at least not yet), I assumed you did it at his request, but I just noticed on his talk that he's asking why, too, so I'm confused. Best wishes, Bishonen | talk 19:35, 6 May 2007 (UTC).
The user has responded to concerns about the manner in which he was editing. Considering the fact that the user had not edited in hours when you placed the block, was it really needed? Anyways, there is a small discussion brewing at the talk page and I have told the user that I would get your attention. HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 23:10, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
NEXT TIME!!! HalfShadow 03:34, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Are you being coy, or did you not get the Inspector Gadget reference? hbdragon88 23:15, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Ryulong, please take a look at the merge proposal in Talk:Image (disambiguation), and object there if you don't like the plan that you just jumped into the middle of. Thanks. Dicklyon 03:40, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Parthian, the Wikimedia Foundation really does require that you explicitly mention the source of the image if it is truly a photograph you have created and therefore own the copyright to. Copyright violation is a serious issue on Wikipedia and may bring the project into disrepute and legal trouble if the original photographer (if he is not you) finds that you have licensed his work for free when he was originally paid to do so. This is why aski is pressing the issue.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍) 06:09, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry but it seems that you need to read my previous reply again! ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 06:49, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
FYI, as you were the last admin to block him; I just blocked again for a month for another WP:BLP violation -- Steve (Stephen) talk 00:11, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
IP-based editors keep making changes to the voice actors for the monsters for MMPRS1-2. Naturally, none of their stuff is sourced, as sourcing any monster actors from that time is pretty much impossible. Just an FYI. JPG-GR 20:27, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
ru:Обсуждение_Википедии:Посольство#Open_Proxy User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 07:33, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
On what information did you determine that Skult was Nathan? - Mgm| (talk) 09:55, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
What happened with that important category you just removed from my user page????
— Cesar Tort 01:22, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
This sounds extremely bizarre to me. It's like saying that there's no problem in Calcutta or here, in Mexico City with more than 20 million, many of which are very poor. "Wikipedians interested in overpopulation issues" sounds to me as Newspeak's blackwhite speech: it conveys exactly the opposite idea of what I am concerned about. — Cesar Tort 01:55, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
What do you mean that it wouldn’t help? Any new user that sees this category could use it in his or her user page as a moral statement representing what historian Kenneth Clark, the author of the acclaimed TV series Civilisation, called the new barbarians: the people who breed like rabbits condemning millions to poverty. — Cesar Tort 02:14, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
But technically, Rinrinshi & BeastMan Forms are one and the same. Beast Man Forms are the supered-form of a Rinrinshi. Fractyl 02:43, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm giving you notification that I'll be bringing your banning of User:AmendmentNumberOne up in an RfA. - JNighthawk 03:23, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
User:John miller19677 e-mailed unblock-en-l asking to be unblocked so they could keep creating Delticom. While I don't think that the version they created was good, I think that an indef with no warnings is a little harsh. Or is there something that I'm missing? Veinor (talk to me) 20:44, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Take a look at this. TML 10:47, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I know you feel strongly that the block was appropriate, but I have some qualms about your reblock the other day of User:AmendmentNumberOne. The account was obviously created as an SPA and may well be a sock/alternate account, and I have previously opined on ANI that its approach to a difficult issue was unnecessarily confrontational and strident. Nonetheless, neither a harsh tone on talk pages nor an editor's protesting against his previous block on ANI is, of itself, a blockable offense. I don't see any other user misconduct (in fact, as you noted, there hasn't been any other user conduct at all yet, one way or the other). In your block summary—"User has only existed here to push a single point of view concerning the encryption key; no attempts have been made to edit a single article in the two days that this account was unblocked. This user is not here to contribute to the encyclopedia"—the first two sentences do not constitute a strong basis for a block, and the third is a conclusion based on what I consider insufficient evidence. Under the circumstances, I would have preferred, at a minimum, to allow more time to see whether problems developed before there was any consideration of reblocking. I'm sorry to be critical, and I'd welcome any additional thoughts you may have on this. Regards, Newyorkbrad 01:59, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Just out of interest, why, in the article on locus of control, did you remove my reference to Anderson's work? I did give a source for this research into attributional style, and what is more, if you go to the following website - www.psychology.iastate.edu/faculty/caa/abstracts/Personality/Attr. Style.html
You will see that it lists Anderson's work on the concept. ACEOREVIVED 16:27, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Don't know what you were planning there, but your edits broke the template. The change was reverted. Vegaswikian 19:39, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi, A checkuser IP Check case you filled has been completed by a CheckUser, and archived. You can find the results for 7 days at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/IP check/Archive. -- lucasbfr talk, checkuser clerk, 15:44, 13 May 2007 (UTC).
Pokémon Brown HalfShadow 02:08, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Now you're going to get "FUHKKING SUED!!!" (nyuknyuknyuk...) 02:14, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Where can I find the code for the cool calendar page with the clock that you have right above the archive links? lwalt 04:17, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Hey? What is the big deal about the penguin icon on the top right of the screen? Is it something special? King Lopez Contribs 08:08, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Very nice. King Lopez Contribs 08:12, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Not really often. Only when I have questions about Wikipedia and I need advice from a experince editor like you. If that bothers you I can ask those questions to someone else. King Lopez Contribs 09:02, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
for reverting vandalism on my user page. Gman124 21:45, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Is there some reason you reverted the move I made from Smoking pipe (tobacco) to Pipe smoking (tobacco)? I'm trying to implement a cleanup that has been discussed and agreed upon for several weeks now. The pipe-smoking-related articles have been a mess since the original article expanded and split, so if you have any suggestions on how to cleanly do this cleanup, I'd like to hear them. Frotz 09:37, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
You blocked this user, who is requesting unblocking, for uploading a lot of screenshots. As far as I can tell, although he's uploaded a lot of screenshots, they're all appropriately tagged, with FU rationales, and are used in articles in line with what seems like standard practice on Wikipedia, and he didn't have a warning or any discussion. Is there something I'm missing? Mango juice talk 17:21, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Many thanks for being gracious and polite, and offering an apology in which you explained that the removal of the reference to Anderson's work, in the article on locus of control, was simply an accident. I have now put this reference back in the article. Please do not worry, I take the point about the need to remove the category "Articles which have seen by internationally recognised figures who have published work in the field". After all, they may have seen it, but I do not think any of them edited the article. I raised the question of this category at Wikipedia: Village Pump, and had a similar negative response. ACEOREVIVED 20:16, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
What was the reason Kantojohtohoennshinnoh blocked? Just curious because of the long name. VK35 20:40, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Despite the fact I lengthened episode summaries, they still need to be terse and to the point. Expansions such at these get to the point where it is almost a copyright violation. We need to keep things at the length I had them at and to the point, and whatever is important for the plot of that arc is to be written about. We don't need to get too detailed. That's why it's a summary.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍) 22:52, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
I guess I understand, I'll try not to go that far. Fractyl 00:41, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Excuse me, but why did you delete the Michael Jackson photo from my user page? -- T-9000 09:34, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Could you perhaps give me the URL so I can add a ref properly?— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍) 21:03, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Here you go [6] Fractyl 22:54, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
I have to disagree with you, the imagin do have genders. Most being male. Fractyl 02:00, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
His name is meant as a homage to Bruce Lee. Plus, to further the homeage, in "Enter the Dragon", Lee(Bruce Lee) was asked, "What great technique you wish to aquire." To which Lee answered, "To have no technique". Fractyl 02:08, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Why did you delete it? It was encyclopedic material. - 2-16 13:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
From the movie page, Aki Hoshino is to appear as Senhime Den-O Sword-form and Senhime Fractyl 16:48, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Hey! I'm really sorry for talking to you only now, but with so many messages and work to do in th pt:wiki, I couldn't see your post until now. My english is kinda stuck, so, you may find some spelling problems - sorry about that!
But, well, did you solve your problem? Can I still help? You can talk to me here or in the pt:wiki. Lucia Carvalho Hey! 18:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Dear Ryulong, thankyou for the unblock after my autoblock. Would it be so unusual if I removed the whole unblock buisiness and that whole section from my talk page? Thanks, Anonymous Dissident Utter 22:14, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
It appears that there is some sort of issue with autoblock. Smee has 2 auto blocks and the IP's show as being registered to wikipedia. Lsi john 22:15, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Dear Ryulong,
Thank you so much for lifting my autoblock. I was very confused when it happened, and I'm glad you could remedy the issue. Again thanks!
Sincerely, Denise -- Candy156sweet 22:29, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the lifting my autoblock. I was in the middle of a big edit, and when I tried to submit and it came up. I was really confused. *** Clamster 02:38, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
At WP:ANI#Indef block to User:Billy Ego, you deleted the linkset "{{Usercheck|Billy Ego|ban=y}}", with the edit summary "this isn't WP:CSN". The summary doesn't seem to explain the deletion. The linkset is in no way restricted to WP:CSN; it provides links relevant to the discussion where it was posted. If your only reason to delete it was the belief that it had accidentally been posted on a different noticeboard than intended, please rest assured that this was not the case. Thank you. -- Ben TALK/ HIST 05:28, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
I was told at Protection policy that at one time you were forced to prevent consistent attacks on your user talk page by instituting indefinite semi-protection and creating an extra talk page solely for new users so that they could still leave you comments. I intended to look through your history to see how long this went on for, but after taking one look at how many edits you have, I decided it might be better just to ask. How long was this indefinite suspension for? Once it was removed, were the vandals gone, or did they return? Would you recommend using the same system for another user whose talk page is constantly vandalized? Did you run into any problems with using a subpage for a talk page for new users? What notice did you put on your talk page to explain to new users that they'd have to go to a different page to contact you?
I would appreciate any and all help you may give on this matter. — Eric Herboso 14:12, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
As usual, sources please.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍) 20:36, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Fractyl 20:45, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
If someone removes spoiler tags, don't add them back. The whole point of the RFC is to decide whether or not they are of any use to Wikipedia. Some of us are being bold and getting rid of them where they surely shouldn't be in the first place. Encyclopedias don't have spoiler warnings. Fansite message boards do.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍) 00:01, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Greetings, Ryulong. I just have a question here. Recently, you put a block on someone named YourLord, which was probably for the best, seeing as he was causing a bit of trouble in the pages regarding Bionicle. But you did not seem to use an "official" block like {subst:uw-block1}, or something like that. So can Admins use different methods to block someone? -- -- Gravitan 10:49, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
This page was created entirely by JB196 sockpuppets. A few admins have removed the g5 notice, as they haven't paid attention to the fact that yes, it was altered by many users, but only because the original accounts kept getting blocked. Please deny this user and delete the file. The Evil Spartan 13:21, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Here are the Ringi the duo used in Lesson 13.
Fractyl 05:45, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Ryuto at the episode 17 "To Be Continued" scene
Thanks for uploading Image:V archetypeicon corruptor.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ( ESkog)( Talk) 19:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Card promos
Fractyl 21:31, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I prefer the anal-retentive method. Every once in a while new users start bizarre edit warring over the old revisions (sometimes copyvio) of images. ˉˉ anetode ╦╩ 04:24, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Can you please follow this up? No need for {{ helpme}} tags there, could you also note that? Many thanks, Extranet is now E talk 07:55, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Will attempt to condense my summary of it. Fractyl 20:59, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
I said that Imagin do have gender, as they are human-like in form. Even Den-O Imagin have gender. So far we have see only male Imajin in the show. Fractyl 23:43, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi, why did you block Mac ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) without warning and not reply to any queries from the user (see [8])? Could you show me diffs that he or she was spamming so egregiously that an indef block w/o warning was necessary? Thanks, Iamunknown 04:50, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Ryulong. I am concerned about your remarks on User:Titan124's user talk page regarding his block and vandalism tonight. While I support your decision in blocking him, I think you handled it incivily and bit the newbie a little. I would just kindly ask that in the future, even if it is a blatant vandal, please hold yourself professionally. Thanks :). Kntrabssi 06:03, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Hey Ryulong, why are you delinking my user talk page?
Thanks,
Mathiastck 14:13, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
What speedy criterion are you using to delete things like Rocketfish and Double Redirect, please? I want to understand your methodology before I object. -- nae' blis 14:22, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Why did you revert my move without discussion? Your preferred title isn't even consistent with Enthalpy of fusion, which by the way references this as Heat of vaporization. The way, the truth, and the light 02:01, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
I don't consider you a sysop (as you had to ask a 'crat to promote you...) Ask someone who I do consider a sysop to ask me politely. Matthew 17:09, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
The user was blocked, but why did you remove the section at ANI? Cool Blue talk to me 00:40, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
I came across this unblock request that you declined, which occured in Novemeber of 2006. According to this link, you did not become an administrator until January of this year. Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't that falsely implying that you had admin. powers, to delcine an unblock request while you were not technically an admin.?(I've made comments on their talk page when some had made an unblock request, but I didn't decline, nor approve them on their talk page.)-- Wikipedier is now U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 01:04, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Peguinman how did you get youre userboxes to scrool? Anubiz 16:02, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I also want to know how to make a userbox to scroll, because I want to do that to my own userbox. Look, now my userpage is f***ed up! So I have to put a scroll to my userbox to overcome the mess... -- Edmundkh 17:20, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
The code has a disclamer, dos that mean you will not let us have scrrolling boxes? Anubiz 00:20, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
If you can see this message, then Ryulong's user page was transcluded (or transcluded then substituted) somewhere other than his user page. This page was never meant to be transcluded anywhere else on Wikipedia. As such, please deal with the user who decided to transclude it by blocking him as an impersonator
That. Anubiz 01:57, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for providing the code. But now, I would like to make my Babel box to be also able to scroll. But I still want it to look like the original one, just only adding a scroll to it. Do you know how to do it? I don't want my babel box to look like the other userboxes of mine. -- Edmundkh 16:48, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
OK nevermind, anyway thank you very much for helping, and I would turn to Misza13 instead... -- Edmundkh 05:42, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
I got to scroll but I messed up the rest my page. Help plese. Anubiz 11:56, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Well it was messed up I frougt to deleat that last post. Anubiz 11:03, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
I think it's obivous that Deneb is the Imagin used by Zeronos. Epecially with the pix of Zeronos "Vega" form.
Zeronos & Deneb "Vega-form" Vega-form 2
Fractyl 23:07, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Yes you may (or you can wait for the long message to WP:TV). Matthew 06:15, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
You said that there was no reason to delete Image:Skyfire-satellite.jpg. I thought that re-uploading images that had been deleted was not allowed? This image was originally uploaded by the same user as File:Skyfire-satelliteofdoom.jpg -- JediLofty User ¦ Talk 14:36, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
I have posted a compromise to the issues in the Talk:Regina Neighbourhoods. It is my hope that this will lead to a solution over the disputed figures and edits. I also hope that this will eliminate future accusations as to my identity and/or relation to other banned users. I would appreciate that you read over the compromise and comment on it. I just want to find a solution, that will satisfy all parties.-- 207.81.56.49 07:28, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Ryulong, I understand we haven't had the best relationship, but as a genuine member of this community, I'm going to assume your good faith: look closely. What is happening here has been happening for a long time, it is a very big deal, and it is completely unacceptable. Proabivouac 09:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Yes, this is the reincarnation of Uga Man but I come with a different message. I am sorry to you and to the entire wikipedia community because I now see that what I did was wrong. It was all just immaturity on my part and I have to learn from experiences like this to grow up. I have no plans to destroy wikipedia and I hope that no one else does. I wish everybody here good luck and I hope that the growth of wikipedia continues. Just remember that sockpuppets are people too, they have family, friends, and feelings just like the rest of you. We aren't criminals or thugs but just misguided individuals that want to stir up problems and cause confrontation. I apologize whole heartedly and just wish that I will get forgiveness even though I don't expect it.-- 209.244.187.183 16:51, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Noticing your comments on User:Hotwiki's talk page about not being able to display non-free images or audio files in userspace, I would just like to know if it's still acceptable to link to the image/audio description pages such as Image:Foo.jpg and Image:Bar.ogg. — AnemoneProjectors ( zomg!) 19:23, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Shorten by summary more. Plus, the Ringi should be kept as it was a major one in the plot. Plus, if Gekiwazas gets info provided, the non-important Ringi deserve it too. Fractyl 20:59, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
New pix, the new Fist Saint is said to be named "Sharkie Chan", but I'll keep they under my hat.
Gekijuu Shark-Fist Master GekiSaber GekiShark GekiSharkTohja
Fractyl 21:03, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
I see you caught him already.. Guess we're going to have to lock down those five articles for longer.. I'll add him to the open IP Check. SirFozzie 23:40, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
(outdent) Ferryut ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is the latest.
Yeah, I was trying to revert the edits of the banned user too, but my dyslexia flaired up or something and I read the edits backwards, reverting your's instead. My mistake. I've fixed it. Nikki311 01:08, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Last post. –– Lid( Talk) 03:22, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Hiya. Could you leave a note informing User:Horhay Sanchez that you've permanantly extended his block? I told him it was temporary, so I don't want us to look dishonest. Thanks! -- Masamage ♫ 04:08, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello Ryulong, CyclePat doesn't seem to be baking down he wrote this essay which has the same wording as his "complant" against me and the EA that he posted several times on various Wikipedia pages. If you can do anything about thi sthat would be great also I have started a user conduct RfC on him as a direct result of this essay (since he will not assume good faith, keeps making point issues and I'm taking this also as harassment against myself and the WP:EA). Thanks Æon Insanity Now! 06:24, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks Ryulong, should I keep the RfC going or should I back off? Æon Insanity Now! 06:30, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
How long should it be? What is the maximum character limit? - Bagel7 What ya say, 07:19, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed you have been speedy deleting images with no copyright tag which were only uploaded minutes before deletion, here are some of the images you deleted:
...and others. May I kindly ask you not to do this as the tag with {{no licence|day=31|month=May|year=2007}} should be applied if the image is missing copyright information, then if it has not been added after seven days then it qualifies for deletion but speedy deletion for these does not seem appropriate.
Kindest Regards
The Sunshine
Man
09:42, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello Ryulong. I was reading trough the new votes, and was somewhat puzzled by your comment: "It's about as "pimping" as an external link to the article or main page of the other free content project." This box however is used to replace exactly such types of external links... How is more HTML and a seperate position for this external link not pimping ? -- TheDJ ( talk • contribs) 14:35, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Hey, just wanted to say kudos on the edits to the various Kamen Rider series templates, I think it's a creative step in a positive direction. Also, while I'm here, do you happen to have any input on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tokusatsu#Template:Infobox Kamen Riders and the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tokusatsu#Kamen Rider Wiki? ( Guyinblack25 18:17, 31 May 2007 (UTC))
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
Hi Ryulong. Please undelete me. Firstly I honestly think the decision is wrong:
Secondly the process was flawed:
If you want to re-list we could have a proper AfD debate, but this wasn't it. Many thanks NBeale 23:10, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page. MrMacMan Talk 00:30, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for doing the right thing on that image list. I see you got a lot of fire for it and I hadn't really the stomach to join the fray on ANI at this point, just wanted to let you know I agree with your stance. Let me know if you should need support on other similar cases in the future. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:02, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
What are you doing mass-deleting an entire page full of images without a single day of warning given to even one person? This is completely against all policies. List of Fullmetal Alchemist episodes, List of Planetes episodes, and List of RahXephon media are all Featured-status lists and have a screenshot for every episode; they have have been left alone, so I see no reason why we're suddenly not allowed to imitate the best Wikipedia content. You have no right to go demolishing other people's work without even making an attempt at the correct procedures. -- Masamage ♫ 15:45, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Also: I have reverted the article back to its former state, though it leaves tons of blank links. You removed dozens of articles summeries. If you want to do something... Do it right. so go back and remove them with out removeing our other content. Lego3400: The Sage of Time 23:49, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Most of them were left untouched but somehow Image:SailorMoonEpisode172.JPG, which was also being used to Show the child form of that charcter on the Page about her Villen Group. Could that one be undeleated its use there is not a subject of controversy? Lego3400: The Sage of Time 15:36, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi, A checkuser IP Check case you filled has been completed by a CheckUser, and archived. You can find the results for 7 days at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/IP check/Archive. -- lucasbfr talk, checkuser clerk, 17:31, 1 May 2007 (UTC).
Just wanted to let you know I modified your block of the IP that identified as a banned user. His MO is to disconnect and reconnect from another IP, blocking his current IP for longer than a few hours serves only to inconvenience another user that is assigned that address. Rockpocke t 00:39, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Okay, I've obviously stepped on the wrong toes with trying to delete the redirect. Who did I piss off, and what makes that redirect so special that it shouldn't be deleted? -- Mhking 02:18, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello Ryulong, there's a small problem I'd like you to check up your records on. Before logging on tonight I paid a quick visit to en.wikipedia without logging in, being in two minds whether to do any work or not. Imagine my surprise when I found my IP (or rather the range my IP's in) has been blocked by you. As you can see I'm a registered user and have had no problems logging in. I can assure you I've done nothing to warrant a blocking. As well as being a fairly regular contributor here I'm a sysop on cy.wikipedia (under another name - hoping to dodge any vandals with a grudge!). Fine, I can still get here and edit, but I'm puzzled and a bit worried for fear I might find my account blocked the next time. By the way, there are no contributions recorded for the blocked IP address (88.111.169.225). If you could shed some light on this I'd be grateful. Best wishes, Enaidmawr 20:29, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Just had to vent out... the discussion was too long for me to add my input but you can guess I am for screenshots in episode lists. I rarely make comments like that which you can validate through my good edit history. What is the gist anyway with screenshots? >_> Berserkerz Crit 09:40, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
The history tab shows nothing suspicious... Grue 10:38, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
TheN0ble2 ( talk · contribs) submitted an unblock request (mailing list) apologizing for his actions at Hd dvd key. I think it was a good-faith attempt at an article, and I would like to unblock the user with a warning about reading policy for future reference. Thanks, Nishkid64 ( talk) 14:33, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
You blocked LOrdSteiN ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) as a SPA, and they are currently requesting to be unblocked. I agree that they clearly are an SPA, but that in and of itself is not a sufficient reason for a block. Their edits, while clearly POV were not really spam and they received no warnings about 3RR or POV-pushing. I think they should be unblocked but cautioned over POV-pushing and verifiability. What are your thoughts? —dgies t c 16:17, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost article I'm working on for Monday is about the non-free image debate. As a major contributor to the debate, I mentioned you in the article, which is here: User:Phoenix2/FL fair use. Feel free to change, add, or remove any information you see fit. -- Phoenix ( talk) 23:13, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Quite possibly - it wasn't my comment that was originally supposed to be struck out, but he forgot to close the striek tags so mne got struck out too. Viridae Talk 00:01, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Hey, i'm kinda new here, so I was wondering why the One Piece page I made to edit was deleted. Roselia92
IP-based editors keep making changes to the voice actors for the monsters for MMPRS1-2. Naturally, none of their stuff is sourced, as sourcing any monster actors from that time is pretty much impossible. Just an FYI. JPG-GR 20:27, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello. I just saw the delete log and saw you deleted the Emily (Band) article. As you can probably see, the article has been recreated. Please excuse me if I am wrong, since it is the first time I see the deletion log. Yours truly, Boricuaeddie Talk • Contribs • Spread the love! 00:44, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Would you mind commenting here? Aaron Bowen 07:31, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Violent-kun ( talk · contribs) has seriously fudged the category up by putting redirects in this category. Since you're the leet administrator, could you rollback most of that user's edits to remove the categories? This will work for most characters except for created pages - this user also created most of the Operation Overdrive character redirects, so there's nothing to revert to, and only mnaul removal will do it for those pages. hbdragon88 07:33, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Looks like you rollbacked most of Violdnet-kun's redirect changes in the three minutes between the post and my response. Thanks. hbdragon88 07:56, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Ryulong, what you there was wrong. Ma-hi-ya-sqa is not a word in our language, it's a phonetic equivalent, and in this case given the subject, it's wrong. This redirect needs to be removed. I corrected the site links into the article, and I fail to understand why that link canot be submitted as an Afd. What do you suggest be done here? Jeffrey Vernon Merkey 07:38, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Ryulong. May I ask why you deleted LionheartX' userpage? The reason is not apparent in the deletion log. Since he's not banned or indefinitely blocked (at least not yet), I assumed you did it at his request, but I just noticed on his talk that he's asking why, too, so I'm confused. Best wishes, Bishonen | talk 19:35, 6 May 2007 (UTC).
The user has responded to concerns about the manner in which he was editing. Considering the fact that the user had not edited in hours when you placed the block, was it really needed? Anyways, there is a small discussion brewing at the talk page and I have told the user that I would get your attention. HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 23:10, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
NEXT TIME!!! HalfShadow 03:34, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Are you being coy, or did you not get the Inspector Gadget reference? hbdragon88 23:15, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Ryulong, please take a look at the merge proposal in Talk:Image (disambiguation), and object there if you don't like the plan that you just jumped into the middle of. Thanks. Dicklyon 03:40, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Parthian, the Wikimedia Foundation really does require that you explicitly mention the source of the image if it is truly a photograph you have created and therefore own the copyright to. Copyright violation is a serious issue on Wikipedia and may bring the project into disrepute and legal trouble if the original photographer (if he is not you) finds that you have licensed his work for free when he was originally paid to do so. This is why aski is pressing the issue.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍) 06:09, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry but it seems that you need to read my previous reply again! ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk) 06:49, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
FYI, as you were the last admin to block him; I just blocked again for a month for another WP:BLP violation -- Steve (Stephen) talk 00:11, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
IP-based editors keep making changes to the voice actors for the monsters for MMPRS1-2. Naturally, none of their stuff is sourced, as sourcing any monster actors from that time is pretty much impossible. Just an FYI. JPG-GR 20:27, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
ru:Обсуждение_Википедии:Посольство#Open_Proxy User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 07:33, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
On what information did you determine that Skult was Nathan? - Mgm| (talk) 09:55, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
What happened with that important category you just removed from my user page????
— Cesar Tort 01:22, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
This sounds extremely bizarre to me. It's like saying that there's no problem in Calcutta or here, in Mexico City with more than 20 million, many of which are very poor. "Wikipedians interested in overpopulation issues" sounds to me as Newspeak's blackwhite speech: it conveys exactly the opposite idea of what I am concerned about. — Cesar Tort 01:55, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
What do you mean that it wouldn’t help? Any new user that sees this category could use it in his or her user page as a moral statement representing what historian Kenneth Clark, the author of the acclaimed TV series Civilisation, called the new barbarians: the people who breed like rabbits condemning millions to poverty. — Cesar Tort 02:14, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
But technically, Rinrinshi & BeastMan Forms are one and the same. Beast Man Forms are the supered-form of a Rinrinshi. Fractyl 02:43, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm giving you notification that I'll be bringing your banning of User:AmendmentNumberOne up in an RfA. - JNighthawk 03:23, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
User:John miller19677 e-mailed unblock-en-l asking to be unblocked so they could keep creating Delticom. While I don't think that the version they created was good, I think that an indef with no warnings is a little harsh. Or is there something that I'm missing? Veinor (talk to me) 20:44, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Take a look at this. TML 10:47, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I know you feel strongly that the block was appropriate, but I have some qualms about your reblock the other day of User:AmendmentNumberOne. The account was obviously created as an SPA and may well be a sock/alternate account, and I have previously opined on ANI that its approach to a difficult issue was unnecessarily confrontational and strident. Nonetheless, neither a harsh tone on talk pages nor an editor's protesting against his previous block on ANI is, of itself, a blockable offense. I don't see any other user misconduct (in fact, as you noted, there hasn't been any other user conduct at all yet, one way or the other). In your block summary—"User has only existed here to push a single point of view concerning the encryption key; no attempts have been made to edit a single article in the two days that this account was unblocked. This user is not here to contribute to the encyclopedia"—the first two sentences do not constitute a strong basis for a block, and the third is a conclusion based on what I consider insufficient evidence. Under the circumstances, I would have preferred, at a minimum, to allow more time to see whether problems developed before there was any consideration of reblocking. I'm sorry to be critical, and I'd welcome any additional thoughts you may have on this. Regards, Newyorkbrad 01:59, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Just out of interest, why, in the article on locus of control, did you remove my reference to Anderson's work? I did give a source for this research into attributional style, and what is more, if you go to the following website - www.psychology.iastate.edu/faculty/caa/abstracts/Personality/Attr. Style.html
You will see that it lists Anderson's work on the concept. ACEOREVIVED 16:27, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Don't know what you were planning there, but your edits broke the template. The change was reverted. Vegaswikian 19:39, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi, A checkuser IP Check case you filled has been completed by a CheckUser, and archived. You can find the results for 7 days at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/IP check/Archive. -- lucasbfr talk, checkuser clerk, 15:44, 13 May 2007 (UTC).
Pokémon Brown HalfShadow 02:08, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Now you're going to get "FUHKKING SUED!!!" (nyuknyuknyuk...) 02:14, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Where can I find the code for the cool calendar page with the clock that you have right above the archive links? lwalt 04:17, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Hey? What is the big deal about the penguin icon on the top right of the screen? Is it something special? King Lopez Contribs 08:08, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Very nice. King Lopez Contribs 08:12, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Not really often. Only when I have questions about Wikipedia and I need advice from a experince editor like you. If that bothers you I can ask those questions to someone else. King Lopez Contribs 09:02, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
for reverting vandalism on my user page. Gman124 21:45, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Is there some reason you reverted the move I made from Smoking pipe (tobacco) to Pipe smoking (tobacco)? I'm trying to implement a cleanup that has been discussed and agreed upon for several weeks now. The pipe-smoking-related articles have been a mess since the original article expanded and split, so if you have any suggestions on how to cleanly do this cleanup, I'd like to hear them. Frotz 09:37, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
You blocked this user, who is requesting unblocking, for uploading a lot of screenshots. As far as I can tell, although he's uploaded a lot of screenshots, they're all appropriately tagged, with FU rationales, and are used in articles in line with what seems like standard practice on Wikipedia, and he didn't have a warning or any discussion. Is there something I'm missing? Mango juice talk 17:21, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Many thanks for being gracious and polite, and offering an apology in which you explained that the removal of the reference to Anderson's work, in the article on locus of control, was simply an accident. I have now put this reference back in the article. Please do not worry, I take the point about the need to remove the category "Articles which have seen by internationally recognised figures who have published work in the field". After all, they may have seen it, but I do not think any of them edited the article. I raised the question of this category at Wikipedia: Village Pump, and had a similar negative response. ACEOREVIVED 20:16, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
What was the reason Kantojohtohoennshinnoh blocked? Just curious because of the long name. VK35 20:40, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Despite the fact I lengthened episode summaries, they still need to be terse and to the point. Expansions such at these get to the point where it is almost a copyright violation. We need to keep things at the length I had them at and to the point, and whatever is important for the plot of that arc is to be written about. We don't need to get too detailed. That's why it's a summary.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍) 22:52, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
I guess I understand, I'll try not to go that far. Fractyl 00:41, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Excuse me, but why did you delete the Michael Jackson photo from my user page? -- T-9000 09:34, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Could you perhaps give me the URL so I can add a ref properly?— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍) 21:03, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Here you go [6] Fractyl 22:54, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
I have to disagree with you, the imagin do have genders. Most being male. Fractyl 02:00, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
His name is meant as a homage to Bruce Lee. Plus, to further the homeage, in "Enter the Dragon", Lee(Bruce Lee) was asked, "What great technique you wish to aquire." To which Lee answered, "To have no technique". Fractyl 02:08, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Why did you delete it? It was encyclopedic material. - 2-16 13:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
From the movie page, Aki Hoshino is to appear as Senhime Den-O Sword-form and Senhime Fractyl 16:48, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Hey! I'm really sorry for talking to you only now, but with so many messages and work to do in th pt:wiki, I couldn't see your post until now. My english is kinda stuck, so, you may find some spelling problems - sorry about that!
But, well, did you solve your problem? Can I still help? You can talk to me here or in the pt:wiki. Lucia Carvalho Hey! 18:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Dear Ryulong, thankyou for the unblock after my autoblock. Would it be so unusual if I removed the whole unblock buisiness and that whole section from my talk page? Thanks, Anonymous Dissident Utter 22:14, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
It appears that there is some sort of issue with autoblock. Smee has 2 auto blocks and the IP's show as being registered to wikipedia. Lsi john 22:15, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Dear Ryulong,
Thank you so much for lifting my autoblock. I was very confused when it happened, and I'm glad you could remedy the issue. Again thanks!
Sincerely, Denise -- Candy156sweet 22:29, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the lifting my autoblock. I was in the middle of a big edit, and when I tried to submit and it came up. I was really confused. *** Clamster 02:38, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
At WP:ANI#Indef block to User:Billy Ego, you deleted the linkset "{{Usercheck|Billy Ego|ban=y}}", with the edit summary "this isn't WP:CSN". The summary doesn't seem to explain the deletion. The linkset is in no way restricted to WP:CSN; it provides links relevant to the discussion where it was posted. If your only reason to delete it was the belief that it had accidentally been posted on a different noticeboard than intended, please rest assured that this was not the case. Thank you. -- Ben TALK/ HIST 05:28, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
I was told at Protection policy that at one time you were forced to prevent consistent attacks on your user talk page by instituting indefinite semi-protection and creating an extra talk page solely for new users so that they could still leave you comments. I intended to look through your history to see how long this went on for, but after taking one look at how many edits you have, I decided it might be better just to ask. How long was this indefinite suspension for? Once it was removed, were the vandals gone, or did they return? Would you recommend using the same system for another user whose talk page is constantly vandalized? Did you run into any problems with using a subpage for a talk page for new users? What notice did you put on your talk page to explain to new users that they'd have to go to a different page to contact you?
I would appreciate any and all help you may give on this matter. — Eric Herboso 14:12, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
As usual, sources please.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍) 20:36, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Fractyl 20:45, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
If someone removes spoiler tags, don't add them back. The whole point of the RFC is to decide whether or not they are of any use to Wikipedia. Some of us are being bold and getting rid of them where they surely shouldn't be in the first place. Encyclopedias don't have spoiler warnings. Fansite message boards do.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍) 00:01, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Greetings, Ryulong. I just have a question here. Recently, you put a block on someone named YourLord, which was probably for the best, seeing as he was causing a bit of trouble in the pages regarding Bionicle. But you did not seem to use an "official" block like {subst:uw-block1}, or something like that. So can Admins use different methods to block someone? -- -- Gravitan 10:49, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
This page was created entirely by JB196 sockpuppets. A few admins have removed the g5 notice, as they haven't paid attention to the fact that yes, it was altered by many users, but only because the original accounts kept getting blocked. Please deny this user and delete the file. The Evil Spartan 13:21, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Here are the Ringi the duo used in Lesson 13.
Fractyl 05:45, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Ryuto at the episode 17 "To Be Continued" scene
Thanks for uploading Image:V archetypeicon corruptor.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ( ESkog)( Talk) 19:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Card promos
Fractyl 21:31, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I prefer the anal-retentive method. Every once in a while new users start bizarre edit warring over the old revisions (sometimes copyvio) of images. ˉˉ anetode ╦╩ 04:24, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Can you please follow this up? No need for {{ helpme}} tags there, could you also note that? Many thanks, Extranet is now E talk 07:55, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Will attempt to condense my summary of it. Fractyl 20:59, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
I said that Imagin do have gender, as they are human-like in form. Even Den-O Imagin have gender. So far we have see only male Imajin in the show. Fractyl 23:43, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi, why did you block Mac ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) without warning and not reply to any queries from the user (see [8])? Could you show me diffs that he or she was spamming so egregiously that an indef block w/o warning was necessary? Thanks, Iamunknown 04:50, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Ryulong. I am concerned about your remarks on User:Titan124's user talk page regarding his block and vandalism tonight. While I support your decision in blocking him, I think you handled it incivily and bit the newbie a little. I would just kindly ask that in the future, even if it is a blatant vandal, please hold yourself professionally. Thanks :). Kntrabssi 06:03, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Hey Ryulong, why are you delinking my user talk page?
Thanks,
Mathiastck 14:13, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
What speedy criterion are you using to delete things like Rocketfish and Double Redirect, please? I want to understand your methodology before I object. -- nae' blis 14:22, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Why did you revert my move without discussion? Your preferred title isn't even consistent with Enthalpy of fusion, which by the way references this as Heat of vaporization. The way, the truth, and the light 02:01, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
I don't consider you a sysop (as you had to ask a 'crat to promote you...) Ask someone who I do consider a sysop to ask me politely. Matthew 17:09, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
The user was blocked, but why did you remove the section at ANI? Cool Blue talk to me 00:40, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
I came across this unblock request that you declined, which occured in Novemeber of 2006. According to this link, you did not become an administrator until January of this year. Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't that falsely implying that you had admin. powers, to delcine an unblock request while you were not technically an admin.?(I've made comments on their talk page when some had made an unblock request, but I didn't decline, nor approve them on their talk page.)-- Wikipedier is now U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 01:04, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Peguinman how did you get youre userboxes to scrool? Anubiz 16:02, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I also want to know how to make a userbox to scroll, because I want to do that to my own userbox. Look, now my userpage is f***ed up! So I have to put a scroll to my userbox to overcome the mess... -- Edmundkh 17:20, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
The code has a disclamer, dos that mean you will not let us have scrrolling boxes? Anubiz 00:20, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
If you can see this message, then Ryulong's user page was transcluded (or transcluded then substituted) somewhere other than his user page. This page was never meant to be transcluded anywhere else on Wikipedia. As such, please deal with the user who decided to transclude it by blocking him as an impersonator
That. Anubiz 01:57, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for providing the code. But now, I would like to make my Babel box to be also able to scroll. But I still want it to look like the original one, just only adding a scroll to it. Do you know how to do it? I don't want my babel box to look like the other userboxes of mine. -- Edmundkh 16:48, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
OK nevermind, anyway thank you very much for helping, and I would turn to Misza13 instead... -- Edmundkh 05:42, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
I got to scroll but I messed up the rest my page. Help plese. Anubiz 11:56, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Well it was messed up I frougt to deleat that last post. Anubiz 11:03, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
I think it's obivous that Deneb is the Imagin used by Zeronos. Epecially with the pix of Zeronos "Vega" form.
Zeronos & Deneb "Vega-form" Vega-form 2
Fractyl 23:07, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Yes you may (or you can wait for the long message to WP:TV). Matthew 06:15, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
You said that there was no reason to delete Image:Skyfire-satellite.jpg. I thought that re-uploading images that had been deleted was not allowed? This image was originally uploaded by the same user as File:Skyfire-satelliteofdoom.jpg -- JediLofty User ¦ Talk 14:36, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
I have posted a compromise to the issues in the Talk:Regina Neighbourhoods. It is my hope that this will lead to a solution over the disputed figures and edits. I also hope that this will eliminate future accusations as to my identity and/or relation to other banned users. I would appreciate that you read over the compromise and comment on it. I just want to find a solution, that will satisfy all parties.-- 207.81.56.49 07:28, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Ryulong, I understand we haven't had the best relationship, but as a genuine member of this community, I'm going to assume your good faith: look closely. What is happening here has been happening for a long time, it is a very big deal, and it is completely unacceptable. Proabivouac 09:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Yes, this is the reincarnation of Uga Man but I come with a different message. I am sorry to you and to the entire wikipedia community because I now see that what I did was wrong. It was all just immaturity on my part and I have to learn from experiences like this to grow up. I have no plans to destroy wikipedia and I hope that no one else does. I wish everybody here good luck and I hope that the growth of wikipedia continues. Just remember that sockpuppets are people too, they have family, friends, and feelings just like the rest of you. We aren't criminals or thugs but just misguided individuals that want to stir up problems and cause confrontation. I apologize whole heartedly and just wish that I will get forgiveness even though I don't expect it.-- 209.244.187.183 16:51, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Noticing your comments on User:Hotwiki's talk page about not being able to display non-free images or audio files in userspace, I would just like to know if it's still acceptable to link to the image/audio description pages such as Image:Foo.jpg and Image:Bar.ogg. — AnemoneProjectors ( zomg!) 19:23, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Shorten by summary more. Plus, the Ringi should be kept as it was a major one in the plot. Plus, if Gekiwazas gets info provided, the non-important Ringi deserve it too. Fractyl 20:59, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
New pix, the new Fist Saint is said to be named "Sharkie Chan", but I'll keep they under my hat.
Gekijuu Shark-Fist Master GekiSaber GekiShark GekiSharkTohja
Fractyl 21:03, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
I see you caught him already.. Guess we're going to have to lock down those five articles for longer.. I'll add him to the open IP Check. SirFozzie 23:40, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
(outdent) Ferryut ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is the latest.
Yeah, I was trying to revert the edits of the banned user too, but my dyslexia flaired up or something and I read the edits backwards, reverting your's instead. My mistake. I've fixed it. Nikki311 01:08, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Last post. –– Lid( Talk) 03:22, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Hiya. Could you leave a note informing User:Horhay Sanchez that you've permanantly extended his block? I told him it was temporary, so I don't want us to look dishonest. Thanks! -- Masamage ♫ 04:08, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello Ryulong, CyclePat doesn't seem to be baking down he wrote this essay which has the same wording as his "complant" against me and the EA that he posted several times on various Wikipedia pages. If you can do anything about thi sthat would be great also I have started a user conduct RfC on him as a direct result of this essay (since he will not assume good faith, keeps making point issues and I'm taking this also as harassment against myself and the WP:EA). Thanks Æon Insanity Now! 06:24, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks Ryulong, should I keep the RfC going or should I back off? Æon Insanity Now! 06:30, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
How long should it be? What is the maximum character limit? - Bagel7 What ya say, 07:19, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed you have been speedy deleting images with no copyright tag which were only uploaded minutes before deletion, here are some of the images you deleted:
...and others. May I kindly ask you not to do this as the tag with {{no licence|day=31|month=May|year=2007}} should be applied if the image is missing copyright information, then if it has not been added after seven days then it qualifies for deletion but speedy deletion for these does not seem appropriate.
Kindest Regards
The Sunshine
Man
09:42, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello Ryulong. I was reading trough the new votes, and was somewhat puzzled by your comment: "It's about as "pimping" as an external link to the article or main page of the other free content project." This box however is used to replace exactly such types of external links... How is more HTML and a seperate position for this external link not pimping ? -- TheDJ ( talk • contribs) 14:35, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Hey, just wanted to say kudos on the edits to the various Kamen Rider series templates, I think it's a creative step in a positive direction. Also, while I'm here, do you happen to have any input on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tokusatsu#Template:Infobox Kamen Riders and the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tokusatsu#Kamen Rider Wiki? ( Guyinblack25 18:17, 31 May 2007 (UTC))