My discussion page...
Yes you can! I'm learning. I want to know everything. User:Bonaparte
Once you are done reading those articles I'd be happy to answer further questions. -- rydel 15:32, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
Sorry but your claims in several articles hold no validity. In the census of 1897 in the following Guberniyans the Belarussian speakers accounted for absoloute majority: (roughly after 100 years of Russian rule) and called their language nor Russian but instead Belarussian:
All Empire | 125640021 | 5885547 | 55667469 | 7931307 |
Guberniya | Total Population | Belarussian | Great Russian | Polish |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vilna | 1591207 | 891903 | 78623 | 130054 |
Vitebsk | 1489246 | 987020 | 198001 | 50377 |
Grodno | 1603409 | 1141714 | 74143 | 161662 |
Minsk | 2147621 | 1633091 | 83999 | 64617 |
Mogilev | 1686764 | 1389782 | 58155 | 17526 |
Smolensk | 1525279 | 100757 | 1397875 | 7314 |
Chernigov | 2297854 | 151465 | 495963 | 3302 |
Forevisla guberniyas | 9402253 | 29347 | 335337 | 6755503 |
!!!!! MAP1!!!!! !!!!! MAP2!!!!!
Conclusion: By the end of the 19th century on the territory gained in Polish partitions and in 1815 Russian language shows no dominating use. Therefore no evidence for Russifacations exist. Так что спи спокойно и прекрати бред нести. -- Kuban kazak 17:09, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
Here is more Here is more, same site, only about Post revolution data about the BSSR:
Census Year | Total Population | Belarussian | Great Russian | Polish |
---|---|---|---|---|
1939 | 5568994 | 4615496 | 364705 | 58380 |
1959 | 8054648 | 6532035 | 659093 | 538881 |
1970 | 9002338 | 7289610 | 938161 | 382600 |
1979 | 9532516 | 7567955 | 1134117 | 403169 |
1989 | 10151806 | 7904623 | 1342099 | 417720 |
BTW feel free to put this data on your blog, and share it with your fellow "Litvians". -- Kuban kazak 17:48, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
I'm still waiting my answer. Bonaparte 19:02, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
I'm still waiting my answer. Bonaparte
Halibutt and Piotrus have some crazy idea of making HoB into FAC. Could you take some time to read the article and say what it's missing and what is wrong there from the Belarusian perspective. Thanks. -- Lysy ( talk) 07:29, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
Support my mediation. You know I will keep a fair judge. I am a third party here. -- Bonaparte talk & contribs 11:53, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
It is a generic message to inform you that there was a User Conduct Request for Comments at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Ghirlandajo started recently. As you are one of the sides in the conflict and your name appears in the evidence of disputed behaviour section you might want to take a look at it. Halibu tt 00:27, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
Hi Rydel, I'm was about to transfer the photo Veronika cherkasova.jpg from the German and English Wikipedia to commons. In the German WP there was no copyright tag, in the English there is one that says the the picture is released under Public Domain. Could you please specify why it is supposed to be PD (because I assume you are not the photographer)? Or you can upload it at commons.wikipedia.org so the two copies at the German and the English Wikipedia could be deleted. -- Matt 314 21:49, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thanks for your link! -- Monkbel 22:08, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
Would you like to explain your actions of reverting my corrections, factual addition and a more NPOV approach? Considering that I have not ommited a single fact from the original text I would like a reason of not reporting your action to the WP:AN/3RR. Хотя сам говорил что закончил на Википедии...проясни.-- Kuban kazak 23:37, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
I tried to send a mail to you, but it did not work, because you did not type in the mail into your preferences. Could you please correct your preferencies and send me an email? Thanks.-- AndriyK 11:47, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
Hi Rydel! I suggest you to request a mediation. If you agree, please put me in the list of the involved parties. Ask also Lysy whether he agrees to participate.-- AndriyK 09:51, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
Rydel you are walking thin on ice. First of all stop personal accusations, they will get you nowhere (if you are keen file an arbitration and watch what happens). Second stop pushing your POV into wiki. You can write anything you want on pravapis or wherever else, but not in an international encyclopedia. And finally I would like that you engage in discussions. The Belarusian Laguage is still open to discussion and I have responded to everything there. А вообще-то я лично таких как ты в Беларуси никогда не видал...-- Kuban kazak 12:30, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
As this looks more like a content dispute, less a clear vandalism, check Wikipedia:Dispute resolution and see what applies in your case.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:02, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
Rydel, I got your message. We have to stop those "k-words" from thinking they own the world. They constantly insult, spread rumors, and falsify history. They call me a "Revert Warrior" - good! That's what they're gonna get. Space Cadet 16:52, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
You might want to read this article. Fascinating, isn't it... Halibu tt 13:47, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
I just created this new article. Would you please have a look over it for mistakes? Thanks. — Michael Z. 2006-02-12 22:55 Z
Look if you have a problem with the article then talk about them, discuss them in detail even the banned by arbcom troll AndriyK in the end participated in the discussion Talk:Belarusian language#Comments. Why do you have to be different? Have you ever read this WP:FAITH, have a look there. Once again it is not the content dispute, but the manner at which you handle it. -- Kuban Cossack 00:09, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Political views of Lukianenko are his view of future world, if it's not a joke. He is a science-fiction writer, and must predict future. He is not a politician to think how not to offend somebody. ellol 21:58, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
Rydel... Sorry... From that level of conversation that we have now, we'll not come to anything, except revert war. I'm constantly reading his livejournal, and from what i've read, i can't say that his position is anti-ukrainean, blah-blah-blah... My word against yours, => dead end. Let's discuss certain occasions.
1) As far as i remember, Lukianenko was NEVER against ukrainean nation. As far as i remember, Lukianenko opposed Uschenko's side during orange revolution. Is it enough to claim him to be "an enemy of ukraina"? Say truth: Lukianenko opposed Uschenko's government during orange revolution.
2) A fraction of his interview with magazine "Polden": Russian journalist: There’s a widespread (sic!) opinion that in the 21st century Russia will start collecting its “own” former territories. What do you think about that?
Sergei Lukyanenko: First of all, I would not put quotation marks around the word “own”! And I would not call them “former”, but “temporarily lost.” Yes, Russia will start getting them back. And it will get them back. And it will add more to what the communists have lost.
{However, translator was a bit of wrong: Da, nachnet. Da, soberet. I escho koe-chto pribavit, poteryannoe kommunistami is Yes, will start. Yes, will collect. And will add something more, which was lost by communists.}
I would call your attention to the following things: 1) there's no word Ukraina or Belorus, 2)It's a calm prognosis, not containing special parts to offend somebody. Have man a right to have his point of view? I think, that it would be hard to express the same point of view more politely. Sincerelly yours, ellol 11:10, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
3)"He said in several TV interviews during Orange revolution"... Rydel, what are you saying? I can remember only one Lukianenko's tv interview, it happened a couple of months ago. And that time he wrote in his blog that he'll have a tv interview, a day or two before it happened... Lukianenko had several radio talkings.. But. But. Presumption of innocence, yeah? ellol 09:06, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Please have a look at wikibooks:False Friends of the Slavist. With your language skills, you can help us very much there. See wikibooks:Talk:False Friends of the Slavist for details on what is still needed. -- Daniel Bunčić 18:21, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked [2] for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. William M. Connolley 17:06, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Rydel. :) I just stumbled across Belarusian Republican Youth Union and I noticed that it is a bit Russian-biased, so I thought of you... — Timwi 18:38, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Source: http://www.br23.net/en/2006/03/24/game-over/
Name: Kuban Cossack | E-mail: Kuban_kazak@mail.ru | IP: 144.82.106.25
Good work Belarus, all evil comes to an end and so did this one. I particulary liked the flag of the UPA - German collaborators who butchered close to 90 000 poles in Volhynia during the second world war - Lukashenko was right about the neo-fascist elements of the white-red-white flags. Hey given the Russophobia on Pravapiss.org that the author exhibits I am not surprised that this was another puny attempt to turn Belarus into another Apraheid-infested Latvia/Estonia. However at least 82.6 % of the Belarusian population have much more common sense than this author.
I do sincerely congradulate all of the Belarusian peoples that will eventually get rid of the Litviyak skeletons in their closets. And personally to Batka!
I want to yell.
together with our huge country.
to our Father (Batka):
"Thank you, our dear Father!"
Live a long life
But not longer.
Life is getting better.
Life is becoming fun.
Source: http://www.br23.net/en/2006/03/24/game-over/
Oh and the verse is wrongly translated
Wanting to say with
our huge country.
tell to (Batka):
"Thank you, our dear!"
Live a long life
and don't fall ill
Life became better.
Life became more fun.
--
Kuban Cossack
18:11, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Dear Rydel, your today's personal attacks against User:Kuban kazak prompted him to request the Wikicommunity to comment on your behaviour. You are welcome to provide your response on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Rydel. I hope this RfC will bring your mutual animosity to an end. Cheers, Ghirla -трёп- 19:35, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
I can't reach br23. Is it a work of Baćka's KGB?-- Amir E. Aharoni 18:44, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Please see this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Russsian_claims_about_Warsaw_Uprising_1794 The author tries to put information from non-objective source as objective article. The source is from Imperial Russia regarding Polish uprising against its occupation. Imperial Russia was known for fabricating and being source of many antipolish fabrications. Because I didn't want to delete this(no blanking) I moved it to a proper article that would deal with claim. -- Molobo 03:05, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
The article Tomasz Wawrzecki mentions a "small Belarusian city of Widsi." The link is red.
Is there such a thing?-- Amir E. Aharoni 17:49, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Wether it is the humiliation of how Lukashenko literally flushed your pathetic opposition head first down the toilet or is it your open racism against Russians (in all respects of that word) such POV-pushing is not going to pass on this encyclopedia. Feel free to put anything you want on your blog (I could not care less what you pollute the internet with it), but if you shall continue to insert POV material, like the Khatyn massacre or different language rules for Belarusian, the reader must be presented FACTS not opinions. А то доиграешся до арбитрации голубчик.-- Kuban Cossack 12:53, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi Rydel,
I've re-added a sentence to the Khatyn article about why it was probably chosen as the BSSR war memorial (to sow confusion with Katyń). While the previous mention of this, which you readded, was (IMHO) strongly POV and should have been rephrased, it was instead deleted by User:Burann (who, interestingly, states on his userpage: "As a Wikipedian, I am a strong believer that every information should be included and none should be deleted. For example, if someone adds some POV information (unless its completely wrong), I believe that it should be not deleted, but instead rewritten in a way telling that it is only a point of view of some group of society rather than an accepted truth.").
I hope my rephrased statement of the existence of this widely held belief will be acceptable to all (even Belarusians I talked to at the Khatyn site itself told me it had been chosen because of the name!); otherwise, we start to run into the rather dangerous precedent that only information about countries that has been approved by the dictatorships running them is acceptably "NPOV". ProhibitOnions 20:59, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
For the record Wikipedia is supposed to show names that are native to ENGLISH not Belarusian, google Gomel vs Homeil or Homyel, look into any foreign media to see what...Gomel. As for language name, please Belarusian not Belarusan, makes me question just how much Belarusian you really are. Finally 3RR four reverts per day, and as for Minsk its NPOV rather than the POV of the people that got what 6, sorry 3% on the elections... Now since I do believe that there is some good in you, do take care and revert all of those changes. So get cracking. Finally don't stalk other peoples' edits -- Kuban Cossack 18:40, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
The main entry is "Homel", and "Gomel" is merely a redirect to "Homel". "Homel" is the main article. -- rydel 22:18, 10 May 2006 (UTC) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Preview Remember that this is only a preview; changes have not yet been saved!
====Regarding reversions [4] made on May 10 2006 ( UTC) to Minsk====
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley 18:54, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
As I said above, Google count is not a good measurement of correctness, especially when it comes to obscure foreign geographic names of small towns (Google people acknowledge that result count gives a very-very rough estimate). Still, as you can see "Homel" is quite popular on Google. "Gomel" is 1.8 millions, and "Homel" is standing at 0.5 millions, which means it's on the same order (and even that shouldn't be relied upon, according to Google programmers). "Gomel" is a Russian, Soviet spelling, so if you have old books, or old sources that use books or papers or journals from the Soviet times or from Russian language sources, they naturally use "Gomel" (sometimes because they are used to, sometimes because they don't know, sometimes because they want to for political reasons to ensure that Russian version should be imposed upon English). So it's natural that "Gomel" is ahead (probably). "Homel", on the other hand, is the correct English spelling of the Belarusan city name. And "Gomel" is an archaic Soviet spelling or Russian-based spelling that it is still popular on the Web. That's it. The fact that it appears to be relatively popular doesn't make it correct. -- rydel 22:04, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Advice to all sides, from your friendly admin: WP:1RR is generally a good idea. Bludgeoning people with 3RR is not good. Spelling: always a bit of a nightmare. Your english-speaking admins can *not* really help. Myabe look at the good-old example of Gdansk which went through endless discussion and arbcomms and so on... and WP:DR. Its all better than reverting to death William M. Connolley 22:24, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Right then, so when the block expires, you do a WP:Requested moves, put a notice on all relevant portals and let the voting begin. As both of us have clearely opposite opinions let us see what third parties think. Remeber Orsha, same way, feel free to copypaste relevant sections out of this talk page onto Gomel's talk page. -- Kuban Cossack 12:00, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_%28city_names%29#Belarus -- Molobo 11:23, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
No problem. If you ever need any help don't hesitate to ask. -- Molobo 17:24, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Hmm, I have seen you use translits of Belarusian rather than Lacinka before, so maybe you will agree with my proposal that wiki ceases to use Lacinka and we adopt a standard Belarusian translit for all titles except those that have a clear use preference in English. Have a look here Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Cyrillic)#Proposal for Belarusian. -- Kuban Cossack 19:23, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Чалом! Вы цікавіцеся беларускай мовай й пішаце й гаворыце менавіта ў ёй. Тады азнаёмцеся з прапановай: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages. Дзяк.
I saw the post on your blog linked to by "missing Wikipedians". I you have my deep wishes for a complete recovery. Good luck! -- Storkk 18:26, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Dziady1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:03, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Pesniary volahda lp cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects ( talk) 20:34, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
The article KRIWI has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Epeefleche (
talk)
05:50, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Niamiha flood 2004.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn ( talk) 11:22, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kriwi (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Very Average Editor ( talk) 05:14, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for editing here and being a great person. I may have never known you but I want to pay my respects. Joey ( talk) 01:54, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
My discussion page...
Yes you can! I'm learning. I want to know everything. User:Bonaparte
Once you are done reading those articles I'd be happy to answer further questions. -- rydel 15:32, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
Sorry but your claims in several articles hold no validity. In the census of 1897 in the following Guberniyans the Belarussian speakers accounted for absoloute majority: (roughly after 100 years of Russian rule) and called their language nor Russian but instead Belarussian:
All Empire | 125640021 | 5885547 | 55667469 | 7931307 |
Guberniya | Total Population | Belarussian | Great Russian | Polish |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vilna | 1591207 | 891903 | 78623 | 130054 |
Vitebsk | 1489246 | 987020 | 198001 | 50377 |
Grodno | 1603409 | 1141714 | 74143 | 161662 |
Minsk | 2147621 | 1633091 | 83999 | 64617 |
Mogilev | 1686764 | 1389782 | 58155 | 17526 |
Smolensk | 1525279 | 100757 | 1397875 | 7314 |
Chernigov | 2297854 | 151465 | 495963 | 3302 |
Forevisla guberniyas | 9402253 | 29347 | 335337 | 6755503 |
!!!!! MAP1!!!!! !!!!! MAP2!!!!!
Conclusion: By the end of the 19th century on the territory gained in Polish partitions and in 1815 Russian language shows no dominating use. Therefore no evidence for Russifacations exist. Так что спи спокойно и прекрати бред нести. -- Kuban kazak 17:09, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
Here is more Here is more, same site, only about Post revolution data about the BSSR:
Census Year | Total Population | Belarussian | Great Russian | Polish |
---|---|---|---|---|
1939 | 5568994 | 4615496 | 364705 | 58380 |
1959 | 8054648 | 6532035 | 659093 | 538881 |
1970 | 9002338 | 7289610 | 938161 | 382600 |
1979 | 9532516 | 7567955 | 1134117 | 403169 |
1989 | 10151806 | 7904623 | 1342099 | 417720 |
BTW feel free to put this data on your blog, and share it with your fellow "Litvians". -- Kuban kazak 17:48, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
I'm still waiting my answer. Bonaparte 19:02, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
I'm still waiting my answer. Bonaparte
Halibutt and Piotrus have some crazy idea of making HoB into FAC. Could you take some time to read the article and say what it's missing and what is wrong there from the Belarusian perspective. Thanks. -- Lysy ( talk) 07:29, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
Support my mediation. You know I will keep a fair judge. I am a third party here. -- Bonaparte talk & contribs 11:53, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
It is a generic message to inform you that there was a User Conduct Request for Comments at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Ghirlandajo started recently. As you are one of the sides in the conflict and your name appears in the evidence of disputed behaviour section you might want to take a look at it. Halibu tt 00:27, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
Hi Rydel, I'm was about to transfer the photo Veronika cherkasova.jpg from the German and English Wikipedia to commons. In the German WP there was no copyright tag, in the English there is one that says the the picture is released under Public Domain. Could you please specify why it is supposed to be PD (because I assume you are not the photographer)? Or you can upload it at commons.wikipedia.org so the two copies at the German and the English Wikipedia could be deleted. -- Matt 314 21:49, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thanks for your link! -- Monkbel 22:08, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
Would you like to explain your actions of reverting my corrections, factual addition and a more NPOV approach? Considering that I have not ommited a single fact from the original text I would like a reason of not reporting your action to the WP:AN/3RR. Хотя сам говорил что закончил на Википедии...проясни.-- Kuban kazak 23:37, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
I tried to send a mail to you, but it did not work, because you did not type in the mail into your preferences. Could you please correct your preferencies and send me an email? Thanks.-- AndriyK 11:47, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
Hi Rydel! I suggest you to request a mediation. If you agree, please put me in the list of the involved parties. Ask also Lysy whether he agrees to participate.-- AndriyK 09:51, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
Rydel you are walking thin on ice. First of all stop personal accusations, they will get you nowhere (if you are keen file an arbitration and watch what happens). Second stop pushing your POV into wiki. You can write anything you want on pravapis or wherever else, but not in an international encyclopedia. And finally I would like that you engage in discussions. The Belarusian Laguage is still open to discussion and I have responded to everything there. А вообще-то я лично таких как ты в Беларуси никогда не видал...-- Kuban kazak 12:30, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
As this looks more like a content dispute, less a clear vandalism, check Wikipedia:Dispute resolution and see what applies in your case.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:02, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
Rydel, I got your message. We have to stop those "k-words" from thinking they own the world. They constantly insult, spread rumors, and falsify history. They call me a "Revert Warrior" - good! That's what they're gonna get. Space Cadet 16:52, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
You might want to read this article. Fascinating, isn't it... Halibu tt 13:47, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
I just created this new article. Would you please have a look over it for mistakes? Thanks. — Michael Z. 2006-02-12 22:55 Z
Look if you have a problem with the article then talk about them, discuss them in detail even the banned by arbcom troll AndriyK in the end participated in the discussion Talk:Belarusian language#Comments. Why do you have to be different? Have you ever read this WP:FAITH, have a look there. Once again it is not the content dispute, but the manner at which you handle it. -- Kuban Cossack 00:09, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Political views of Lukianenko are his view of future world, if it's not a joke. He is a science-fiction writer, and must predict future. He is not a politician to think how not to offend somebody. ellol 21:58, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
Rydel... Sorry... From that level of conversation that we have now, we'll not come to anything, except revert war. I'm constantly reading his livejournal, and from what i've read, i can't say that his position is anti-ukrainean, blah-blah-blah... My word against yours, => dead end. Let's discuss certain occasions.
1) As far as i remember, Lukianenko was NEVER against ukrainean nation. As far as i remember, Lukianenko opposed Uschenko's side during orange revolution. Is it enough to claim him to be "an enemy of ukraina"? Say truth: Lukianenko opposed Uschenko's government during orange revolution.
2) A fraction of his interview with magazine "Polden": Russian journalist: There’s a widespread (sic!) opinion that in the 21st century Russia will start collecting its “own” former territories. What do you think about that?
Sergei Lukyanenko: First of all, I would not put quotation marks around the word “own”! And I would not call them “former”, but “temporarily lost.” Yes, Russia will start getting them back. And it will get them back. And it will add more to what the communists have lost.
{However, translator was a bit of wrong: Da, nachnet. Da, soberet. I escho koe-chto pribavit, poteryannoe kommunistami is Yes, will start. Yes, will collect. And will add something more, which was lost by communists.}
I would call your attention to the following things: 1) there's no word Ukraina or Belorus, 2)It's a calm prognosis, not containing special parts to offend somebody. Have man a right to have his point of view? I think, that it would be hard to express the same point of view more politely. Sincerelly yours, ellol 11:10, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
3)"He said in several TV interviews during Orange revolution"... Rydel, what are you saying? I can remember only one Lukianenko's tv interview, it happened a couple of months ago. And that time he wrote in his blog that he'll have a tv interview, a day or two before it happened... Lukianenko had several radio talkings.. But. But. Presumption of innocence, yeah? ellol 09:06, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Please have a look at wikibooks:False Friends of the Slavist. With your language skills, you can help us very much there. See wikibooks:Talk:False Friends of the Slavist for details on what is still needed. -- Daniel Bunčić 18:21, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked [2] for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. William M. Connolley 17:06, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Rydel. :) I just stumbled across Belarusian Republican Youth Union and I noticed that it is a bit Russian-biased, so I thought of you... — Timwi 18:38, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Source: http://www.br23.net/en/2006/03/24/game-over/
Name: Kuban Cossack | E-mail: Kuban_kazak@mail.ru | IP: 144.82.106.25
Good work Belarus, all evil comes to an end and so did this one. I particulary liked the flag of the UPA - German collaborators who butchered close to 90 000 poles in Volhynia during the second world war - Lukashenko was right about the neo-fascist elements of the white-red-white flags. Hey given the Russophobia on Pravapiss.org that the author exhibits I am not surprised that this was another puny attempt to turn Belarus into another Apraheid-infested Latvia/Estonia. However at least 82.6 % of the Belarusian population have much more common sense than this author.
I do sincerely congradulate all of the Belarusian peoples that will eventually get rid of the Litviyak skeletons in their closets. And personally to Batka!
I want to yell.
together with our huge country.
to our Father (Batka):
"Thank you, our dear Father!"
Live a long life
But not longer.
Life is getting better.
Life is becoming fun.
Source: http://www.br23.net/en/2006/03/24/game-over/
Oh and the verse is wrongly translated
Wanting to say with
our huge country.
tell to (Batka):
"Thank you, our dear!"
Live a long life
and don't fall ill
Life became better.
Life became more fun.
--
Kuban Cossack
18:11, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Dear Rydel, your today's personal attacks against User:Kuban kazak prompted him to request the Wikicommunity to comment on your behaviour. You are welcome to provide your response on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Rydel. I hope this RfC will bring your mutual animosity to an end. Cheers, Ghirla -трёп- 19:35, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
I can't reach br23. Is it a work of Baćka's KGB?-- Amir E. Aharoni 18:44, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Please see this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Russsian_claims_about_Warsaw_Uprising_1794 The author tries to put information from non-objective source as objective article. The source is from Imperial Russia regarding Polish uprising against its occupation. Imperial Russia was known for fabricating and being source of many antipolish fabrications. Because I didn't want to delete this(no blanking) I moved it to a proper article that would deal with claim. -- Molobo 03:05, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
The article Tomasz Wawrzecki mentions a "small Belarusian city of Widsi." The link is red.
Is there such a thing?-- Amir E. Aharoni 17:49, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Wether it is the humiliation of how Lukashenko literally flushed your pathetic opposition head first down the toilet or is it your open racism against Russians (in all respects of that word) such POV-pushing is not going to pass on this encyclopedia. Feel free to put anything you want on your blog (I could not care less what you pollute the internet with it), but if you shall continue to insert POV material, like the Khatyn massacre or different language rules for Belarusian, the reader must be presented FACTS not opinions. А то доиграешся до арбитрации голубчик.-- Kuban Cossack 12:53, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi Rydel,
I've re-added a sentence to the Khatyn article about why it was probably chosen as the BSSR war memorial (to sow confusion with Katyń). While the previous mention of this, which you readded, was (IMHO) strongly POV and should have been rephrased, it was instead deleted by User:Burann (who, interestingly, states on his userpage: "As a Wikipedian, I am a strong believer that every information should be included and none should be deleted. For example, if someone adds some POV information (unless its completely wrong), I believe that it should be not deleted, but instead rewritten in a way telling that it is only a point of view of some group of society rather than an accepted truth.").
I hope my rephrased statement of the existence of this widely held belief will be acceptable to all (even Belarusians I talked to at the Khatyn site itself told me it had been chosen because of the name!); otherwise, we start to run into the rather dangerous precedent that only information about countries that has been approved by the dictatorships running them is acceptably "NPOV". ProhibitOnions 20:59, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
For the record Wikipedia is supposed to show names that are native to ENGLISH not Belarusian, google Gomel vs Homeil or Homyel, look into any foreign media to see what...Gomel. As for language name, please Belarusian not Belarusan, makes me question just how much Belarusian you really are. Finally 3RR four reverts per day, and as for Minsk its NPOV rather than the POV of the people that got what 6, sorry 3% on the elections... Now since I do believe that there is some good in you, do take care and revert all of those changes. So get cracking. Finally don't stalk other peoples' edits -- Kuban Cossack 18:40, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
The main entry is "Homel", and "Gomel" is merely a redirect to "Homel". "Homel" is the main article. -- rydel 22:18, 10 May 2006 (UTC) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Preview Remember that this is only a preview; changes have not yet been saved!
====Regarding reversions [4] made on May 10 2006 ( UTC) to Minsk====
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley 18:54, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
As I said above, Google count is not a good measurement of correctness, especially when it comes to obscure foreign geographic names of small towns (Google people acknowledge that result count gives a very-very rough estimate). Still, as you can see "Homel" is quite popular on Google. "Gomel" is 1.8 millions, and "Homel" is standing at 0.5 millions, which means it's on the same order (and even that shouldn't be relied upon, according to Google programmers). "Gomel" is a Russian, Soviet spelling, so if you have old books, or old sources that use books or papers or journals from the Soviet times or from Russian language sources, they naturally use "Gomel" (sometimes because they are used to, sometimes because they don't know, sometimes because they want to for political reasons to ensure that Russian version should be imposed upon English). So it's natural that "Gomel" is ahead (probably). "Homel", on the other hand, is the correct English spelling of the Belarusan city name. And "Gomel" is an archaic Soviet spelling or Russian-based spelling that it is still popular on the Web. That's it. The fact that it appears to be relatively popular doesn't make it correct. -- rydel 22:04, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Advice to all sides, from your friendly admin: WP:1RR is generally a good idea. Bludgeoning people with 3RR is not good. Spelling: always a bit of a nightmare. Your english-speaking admins can *not* really help. Myabe look at the good-old example of Gdansk which went through endless discussion and arbcomms and so on... and WP:DR. Its all better than reverting to death William M. Connolley 22:24, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Right then, so when the block expires, you do a WP:Requested moves, put a notice on all relevant portals and let the voting begin. As both of us have clearely opposite opinions let us see what third parties think. Remeber Orsha, same way, feel free to copypaste relevant sections out of this talk page onto Gomel's talk page. -- Kuban Cossack 12:00, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_%28city_names%29#Belarus -- Molobo 11:23, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
No problem. If you ever need any help don't hesitate to ask. -- Molobo 17:24, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Hmm, I have seen you use translits of Belarusian rather than Lacinka before, so maybe you will agree with my proposal that wiki ceases to use Lacinka and we adopt a standard Belarusian translit for all titles except those that have a clear use preference in English. Have a look here Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Cyrillic)#Proposal for Belarusian. -- Kuban Cossack 19:23, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Чалом! Вы цікавіцеся беларускай мовай й пішаце й гаворыце менавіта ў ёй. Тады азнаёмцеся з прапановай: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages. Дзяк.
I saw the post on your blog linked to by "missing Wikipedians". I you have my deep wishes for a complete recovery. Good luck! -- Storkk 18:26, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Dziady1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:03, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Pesniary volahda lp cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects ( talk) 20:34, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
The article KRIWI has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Epeefleche (
talk)
05:50, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Niamiha flood 2004.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn ( talk) 11:22, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kriwi (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Very Average Editor ( talk) 05:14, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for editing here and being a great person. I may have never known you but I want to pay my respects. Joey ( talk) 01:54, 22 March 2024 (UTC)