![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | → | Archive 25 |
Thank you for taking decisive action. RashersTierney ( talk) 08:18, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
I haven't forgot, I just have a limited amount of time on the wiki and I'm trying to spend it on stuff for the Cup. I'll get around to it. — Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 16:28, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Rschen, I've noticed you've changed wording about the National Highway System on several articles, including featured article California State Route 52. Previously, "a network of roadways important to the country's economy, defense, and mobility". Your change: "a network of highways that are essential to the country's economy, defense, and mobility". This characterization is not supported by the included citation and per previous discussions, IMO this is original research. I don't want this wording to be enforced at articles I edit. I'd appreciate your reply. Thanks. -- Chaswmsday ( talk) 18:39, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
In my contribution history you'll find Jonathan Yip had returned. This time he's doing several "good" edits, sneaking in a bad one. HkCaGu ( talk) 04:14, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk)
15:59, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Volume 6, Issue 2 • Spring 2013 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS |
No wonder he was so pleased. I nailed him as a puppet but connected him to the wrong master. Lately, it feels like the world is full of nothing but socks.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 00:42, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed some strange edits at Talk:The Ren & Stimpy Show. The first user, Clopssite was blocked by you after two edits for multiple account abuse. Saw a similar test edit on the same page from user Ajarcelli and I thought I'd give you a heads-up in case it's the same person/bot. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:25, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mehrah13 . Blatant block evasion by a user you blocked. I am unfamiliar with the circumstances of the block however. Ramaksoud2000 ( Talk to me) 04:46, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
I would like to point you towards this AUSC announcement from two years ago:
WP:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 7#Checkuser practice regarding the association of IP addresses to accounts.
I for one do no longer go out of my way to avoid making an implicit connection public if a problem user deliberately edits anonymously. When he edits anonymously and continues the disruptive behavior of a named account, he implicitly accepted that the connection is seen publicly.
Standards vary of course, but I don't think you should decline a CU request merely because all supposed socks are IPs.
Cheers,
Amalthea
21:06, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Rschen, just to be sure we're on the same page: an apology is absolutely unnecessary! I see that my words have been received as personal criticism, but that was not at all my intent! I have to apologize for that. I also hope my feedback hasn't in any way made you reluctant to working on SPI cases -- if so I would have done us a great disservice.
Cheers,
Amalthea
10:04, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
I understand that linking to resdirects isn't a problem. What you did in California State Route 75, though, is not just link to redirects—they were piped links to redirects, such as [[San Ysidro, California|San Ysidro]], which pipes to San Ysidro, California, which in turn redirects to San Ysidro, San Diego. This is different from the cases in WP:NOTBROKEN, where, for example, the plain link [[Franklin Roosevelt]] redirects to [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]].
I'm not going to make an issue of it, but it does seem strange and pointless to me to revert all that work. Curly Turkey ( gobble) 01:05, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Here's a plate full of cookies to share! |
Hi Rschen7754/Archive 20, here are some delicious cookies to help brighten your day! However, there are too many cookies here for one person to eat all at once, so please share these cookies with at least two other editors by copying {{ subst:Sharethecookies}} to their talk pages. Enjoy! AutomaticStrikeout ( T • C • Sign AAPT) 01:28, 3 May 2013 (UTC) |
here i request you to check the relations between an not new and child star grown up.please it is important.
istion the ip of child star is 182.188.190.59 taken from its investigation page and my ip is 119.154.4.48.there is absolute no relation between range.the only relation which is visible is relation between location internet service provider and location.and it is because there is only one ISP in Pakistan that is PTCL.i request another clerks to please check my relation again.
please i request you to see once again. Dil e Muslim talk 06:30, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
for the heads-up. I was curious, so I did find the "how, what, and why" here: Wikipedia talk:Unified login/Finalisation — Ched : ? 22:02, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi, you recently blocked Sb2335 as a sock of Bs5522, per this SPI. They have reappeared at Arora as Bb35bb - this edit is a duck quacking through a megaphone job. Can you do the honours or should I open another SPI? - Sitush ( talk) 14:44, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
can you please check this request. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.154.59.198 ( talk) 13:56, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to {{
infobox road}}
. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.
You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:HWY
Nbound ( talk) 22:56, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the vandalism on my talk page. -- Jeremy ( blah blah • I did it!) 06:44, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
I'm writing articles on the Pasadena bungalow courts, and I think your pictures of the Court at 744-756½ S. Marengo Ave. (such as this one) may be of the wrong court. They don't match the pictures from the NRHP nomination, and the nomination itself says the court is Art Deco, which the houses pictured aren't. TheCatalyst31 Reaction• Creation 01:16, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
I recently reported some socks, mistakenly identifying them as socks of Rodhullandemu ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). You then retagged them as socks of Oakey Zass ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), one of the accounts I reported. Following further recent activity, I think that these are actually all puppets of indefinitely blocked serial vandal The abominable Wiki troll ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Could you take a look, and if appropriate retag these? RolandR ( talk) 10:48, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/MezzoMezzo/Archive That was a request which i made some days ago which is now closed.in this edit i presented some strong behavioural evidences about two users.but this edit went against me and they closed my account just by a possible tag. well this is a different matter i want to tell you that.in that request i wrote hundreds of time that look at evidences.my evidences are strong.but they didnt even made effort to see above part of page.mr admin regardless the term who i am my request was not wrong.I request you to once see upper part of page just read my evidences calmly.confirm it by opening pages and then decide was my request wrong.They completly neglected that.just think once with nutral point of view.I cant open that case now coz they will again prove me sock and this case will not be seen again.i kindly request you to once see and reopen that case as you can do it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.172.66.219 ( talk) 21:08, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
|
![]() |
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my talk page (and also for revdeleting it on my user page and talk page)! The Anonymouse ( talk | contribs) 04:18, 16 May 2013 (UTC) |
5.12.68.204 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS)
Could you give any more detail into why you've blocked them? Seems to me that you've blocked them simply for preferring to edit anonymously. As a SPI volunteer, you should know that you should prove evidence, and this seems like a bad-faith block here. Sceptre ( talk) 11:22, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Hate to say it, but I was looking at this CSD nom, and came to the conclusion that while I don't know if there will ever BE an I-2 (and doubt the road is notable at this point), that page wasn't a hoax. (See [1] It is bureaucratic nonsense, but again, not a G3) Courcelles 04:09, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Rschen7754! Can we run a quick sleeper check on the latest Bundy socks? I could file a SPI otherwise: and it may need to be done anyway. These types truly make WP suck. Cheers... Doc talk 08:54, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Okay - it won't be my first! You should be a CU, IMHO. Thanks for your help with this person! Doc talk 09:23, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
If you want to continue to receive the next issues every week, please subscribe to the newsletter. You can subscribe your personal talk page and a community page like this one. The newsletter can be translated into your language.
You can also become a tech ambassador, help us write the next newsletter and tell us what to improve. Your feedback is greatly appreciated. guillom 20:23, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
The above review has been inactive for 30 days, and this is the required notification of that effect, per WP:HWY/ACR. Interested editors are encouraged to enter "Keep" or "Remove" declarations, or continue working on the article to ensure that it will remain at A-Class standards. If no attempts are made to work on the article, and a net 3 Remove declarations have not been entered, the article will remain at A-Class. -- Rs chen 7754 23:51, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk)
13:53, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Rschen7754, I'm working on a project to study the running of WikiProject and possible performance measures for it. I learn from WikiProject U.S. Roads talk page that you are an active member of the project. I would like to invite you to take a short survey for my study. If you are available to take our survey, could you please reply an email to me? I'm new to Wikipedia, I can't send too many emails to other editors due to anti-spam measure. Thank you very much for your time. Xiangju ( talk) 17:22, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Why have you left a talkback notice on my page? Spinning Spark 23:10, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for [17]. Because all three user pages are redlinks (which I knew while creating the report), and because the page doesn't display "User:User:" links but seemingly correct "User:" links, I wasn't aware that what I saw wasn't what I got (if one of them should have been blue instead of red, it would have been more obvious). Not the most intuitive interface. Fram ( talk) 09:19, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
TheSyndromeOfaDown is a suspected sockpuppet of a user you have banned (See his talk), and has seemed to from thin air, weighed in on a discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Australian_Roads#AUshielding_conversions, with some particularly strong opinions. The specific post is a little above the horizontal rule you will find if you scroll down. I though this may be of interest to any currently running investigations. -- Nbound ( talk) 21:18, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Also, see his talk page for more info. Thanks. WorldTraveller101( Trouble?/ My Work) 20:18, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
AutomaticStrikeout
? is wishing you a Happy
Memorial Day! On this day, we recognize our fellow countrymen who have fought our nation's battles for the past several hundred years, protecting our freedom and safety. We remember those who paid the ultimate price and we support those who continue to willingly sacrifice their safety for the sake of their country. Happy Memorial Day!
Share this message by adding {{ subst:Memorial Day}} to a fellow American's talk page.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please inform other users about these changes.
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by Global message delivery • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Unsubscribe.
Please review Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thenightchicagodied as this user is back to socking. Thank you. Technical 13 ( talk) 18:48, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Apologies for editing the archive... did not have an idea about it. Thanks for pointing it out though. Amit ( talk) 05:02, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
What do you think of 71.145.140.37 ( talk)? -- Redrose64 ( talk) 09:06, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
No worries on the revert. I got no edit conflict warning, so didn't see Dennis had closed. I suspect the comment reached the intended recipient anyway. Cheers. Begoon talk 16:47, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
You recently edited this and seem to deal with these things often, so I figured you might know something.
It looks like including a map causes the country param to be required. There is no documentation indicating that this is the case. In fact, the template page lists country as only being for numbered routes. I noticed this on the previous version of the Sunset Blvd page. The person added the infobox with a map. It shows a glaring Script Error text. Since Sunset Blvd isn't a numbered route, there should be no need for a country and state. Including these params adds the section on highways in California, which Sunset Blvd obviously is not.
The backing module specifically mentions that country is required for maps. It seems like a strange requirement. Is this supposed to be the case? If it is, that should probably be mentioned on the template page. lukini ( talk | contribs) 18:58, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Sorry about joining the sockpuppet investigations channel with the nick sockpuppet, as given I'm new to Wikipedia IRC, I didn't realize harmless self humor such as that would constitute a ban from the channel. Are all Wikipedia IRC channels like that in the way of a serious nature?-- 1966batfan ( talk) 03:07, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Template:I-79 aux has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
JJ98 (
Talk)
06:00, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Interstate 8, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Switchback ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:05, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please inform other users about these changes.
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by Global message delivery • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
All OK. -- Rs chen 7754 22:52, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
I have already stop using the account chihonglee and I have already stoped requesting permissions on other wikis, only on wikiversity. Also, every time I request for the permission, you also opposite for the same reason, so do you mean that I will not get any permission for ever?-- Gabrielchihonglee ( talk) 07:48, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
I believe you are incorrect; i have cited policy for WikiProject tagging in my edit summaries. if you revert my edits, then to my understanding of policy, you are being disruptive. Please read the relevant policy, which i have linked to here. Note this is a highlighted policy point (which i did not contribute to). I understand how you feel about the Cal roads project (which is obviously an incredibly well organized project, with great results), but its a project, which is a social construct, and i am stating, as an active member of WikiProject California/SFBA task force, that roads which lie entirely within the state of california are to be included in the California Wikiproject and its task forces. I have removed task forces where the road goes through more than that task forces scope, such as california 1, as that seems like excessive tagging (which i am happy to discuss with members of the cali project if they disagree). In case you are curious, i am not doing this to increase the number of GA/FA articles at the cali projects, as i have probably added about 1,000 stub articles to the project, which doesnt help it look better. I am interested in making sure the California and in particular the sfba wikiprojects are reasonably complete, which doesnt affect the work of other projects in the slightest. I wont revert your reverts, but i may bring any reverts up at ANI, for clarification. Mercurywoodrose ( talk) 03:28, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers:
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.-- Dom497 ( talk) This message was sent out by -- EdwardsBot ( talk) 14:50, 9 June 2013 (UTC) |
Hi Rschen7754, I believe you are either a checkuser or clerk? Could you have a look at the TenMuses SPI and advise if anything is missing to go to next stage? I only ask since there are RMs ticking on that TenMuses precipated. Many thanks. In ictu oculi ( talk) 04:05, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello Rschen. As an experienced SPI clerk, I wonder if you might offer some advice. I re-opened WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Nickaang yesterday, after noticing his latest SP while doing NPP. The promotional tone of the article prompted me to look at the log, which showed that it had recently been deleted G5. But it would be tedious to do this for every new article I look at. How can a non-admin look for articles that have previously been speedied G5? Is there a log of G5'd articles somewhere, that isn't admin-only? Parsing user CSD logs one by one would be impractical, but if there were a central log, then I could write a SP hunting app, or add a feature to an existing utility. There are plenty of anti-vandalism tools, but no tools for sniffing out evidence of potential SPs that I can find. Thanks, Captain Conundrum ( talk) 09:01, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
The template was full of errors - don't you actually look at what you produce? There was a big red error message. Further, it has references to google which are not within WP:RS. I toyed with the idea of {{ db-g1}} first John of Cromer in transit ( talk) mytime= Tue 12:53, wikitime= 11:53, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
If it's not broken, why is it still sitting on Category:Pages with missing references list? Why don't you use your sandbox correctly, write a template correctly, instead of puting live tosh like this which has been broken more than one day (and is still there)? Use your time productively rather than bleat about other people who do. Why don't you pay attention to error messages? John of Cromer in transit ( talk) mytime= Wed 10:17, wikitime= 09:17, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please inform other users about these changes.
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by Global message delivery • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Unsubscribe.
20:04, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Since you’ve just blocked the user that prompted me to ask this Help Desk question about dealing with block evasion, I was wondering if you might be able to answer it. Thanks. — Frungi ( talk) 20:30, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello Rschen, Would you mind removing my reviewer and rollbacker rights? Currently they are useless due to matters surrounding my enwiki account and on one/two occasions I have accidentally used them. So, removal is purely based on retirement of all non account related work. Thanks, John F. Lewis ( talk) 12:34, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi there - I noticed your name at the Meetup LA8 page for the wicnic so I thought 1920s in Los Angeles might interest you. If not, no worries. -- Rosiestep ( talk) 21:33, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Soulflytribe where the page does not display a link to the archive. Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 14:04, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please inform other users about these changes. Translations are available.
__DISAMBIG__
to mark disambiguation pages.
[58]Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by Global message delivery • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Unsubscribe. 00:27, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | → | Archive 25 |
Thank you for taking decisive action. RashersTierney ( talk) 08:18, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
I haven't forgot, I just have a limited amount of time on the wiki and I'm trying to spend it on stuff for the Cup. I'll get around to it. — Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 16:28, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Rschen, I've noticed you've changed wording about the National Highway System on several articles, including featured article California State Route 52. Previously, "a network of roadways important to the country's economy, defense, and mobility". Your change: "a network of highways that are essential to the country's economy, defense, and mobility". This characterization is not supported by the included citation and per previous discussions, IMO this is original research. I don't want this wording to be enforced at articles I edit. I'd appreciate your reply. Thanks. -- Chaswmsday ( talk) 18:39, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
In my contribution history you'll find Jonathan Yip had returned. This time he's doing several "good" edits, sneaking in a bad one. HkCaGu ( talk) 04:14, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk)
15:59, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Volume 6, Issue 2 • Spring 2013 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS |
No wonder he was so pleased. I nailed him as a puppet but connected him to the wrong master. Lately, it feels like the world is full of nothing but socks.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 00:42, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed some strange edits at Talk:The Ren & Stimpy Show. The first user, Clopssite was blocked by you after two edits for multiple account abuse. Saw a similar test edit on the same page from user Ajarcelli and I thought I'd give you a heads-up in case it's the same person/bot. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:25, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mehrah13 . Blatant block evasion by a user you blocked. I am unfamiliar with the circumstances of the block however. Ramaksoud2000 ( Talk to me) 04:46, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
I would like to point you towards this AUSC announcement from two years ago:
WP:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 7#Checkuser practice regarding the association of IP addresses to accounts.
I for one do no longer go out of my way to avoid making an implicit connection public if a problem user deliberately edits anonymously. When he edits anonymously and continues the disruptive behavior of a named account, he implicitly accepted that the connection is seen publicly.
Standards vary of course, but I don't think you should decline a CU request merely because all supposed socks are IPs.
Cheers,
Amalthea
21:06, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Rschen, just to be sure we're on the same page: an apology is absolutely unnecessary! I see that my words have been received as personal criticism, but that was not at all my intent! I have to apologize for that. I also hope my feedback hasn't in any way made you reluctant to working on SPI cases -- if so I would have done us a great disservice.
Cheers,
Amalthea
10:04, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
I understand that linking to resdirects isn't a problem. What you did in California State Route 75, though, is not just link to redirects—they were piped links to redirects, such as [[San Ysidro, California|San Ysidro]], which pipes to San Ysidro, California, which in turn redirects to San Ysidro, San Diego. This is different from the cases in WP:NOTBROKEN, where, for example, the plain link [[Franklin Roosevelt]] redirects to [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]].
I'm not going to make an issue of it, but it does seem strange and pointless to me to revert all that work. Curly Turkey ( gobble) 01:05, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Here's a plate full of cookies to share! |
Hi Rschen7754/Archive 20, here are some delicious cookies to help brighten your day! However, there are too many cookies here for one person to eat all at once, so please share these cookies with at least two other editors by copying {{ subst:Sharethecookies}} to their talk pages. Enjoy! AutomaticStrikeout ( T • C • Sign AAPT) 01:28, 3 May 2013 (UTC) |
here i request you to check the relations between an not new and child star grown up.please it is important.
istion the ip of child star is 182.188.190.59 taken from its investigation page and my ip is 119.154.4.48.there is absolute no relation between range.the only relation which is visible is relation between location internet service provider and location.and it is because there is only one ISP in Pakistan that is PTCL.i request another clerks to please check my relation again.
please i request you to see once again. Dil e Muslim talk 06:30, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
for the heads-up. I was curious, so I did find the "how, what, and why" here: Wikipedia talk:Unified login/Finalisation — Ched : ? 22:02, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi, you recently blocked Sb2335 as a sock of Bs5522, per this SPI. They have reappeared at Arora as Bb35bb - this edit is a duck quacking through a megaphone job. Can you do the honours or should I open another SPI? - Sitush ( talk) 14:44, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
can you please check this request. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.154.59.198 ( talk) 13:56, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to {{
infobox road}}
. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.
You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:HWY
Nbound ( talk) 22:56, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the vandalism on my talk page. -- Jeremy ( blah blah • I did it!) 06:44, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
I'm writing articles on the Pasadena bungalow courts, and I think your pictures of the Court at 744-756½ S. Marengo Ave. (such as this one) may be of the wrong court. They don't match the pictures from the NRHP nomination, and the nomination itself says the court is Art Deco, which the houses pictured aren't. TheCatalyst31 Reaction• Creation 01:16, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
I recently reported some socks, mistakenly identifying them as socks of Rodhullandemu ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). You then retagged them as socks of Oakey Zass ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), one of the accounts I reported. Following further recent activity, I think that these are actually all puppets of indefinitely blocked serial vandal The abominable Wiki troll ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Could you take a look, and if appropriate retag these? RolandR ( talk) 10:48, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/MezzoMezzo/Archive That was a request which i made some days ago which is now closed.in this edit i presented some strong behavioural evidences about two users.but this edit went against me and they closed my account just by a possible tag. well this is a different matter i want to tell you that.in that request i wrote hundreds of time that look at evidences.my evidences are strong.but they didnt even made effort to see above part of page.mr admin regardless the term who i am my request was not wrong.I request you to once see upper part of page just read my evidences calmly.confirm it by opening pages and then decide was my request wrong.They completly neglected that.just think once with nutral point of view.I cant open that case now coz they will again prove me sock and this case will not be seen again.i kindly request you to once see and reopen that case as you can do it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.172.66.219 ( talk) 21:08, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
|
![]() |
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my talk page (and also for revdeleting it on my user page and talk page)! The Anonymouse ( talk | contribs) 04:18, 16 May 2013 (UTC) |
5.12.68.204 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS)
Could you give any more detail into why you've blocked them? Seems to me that you've blocked them simply for preferring to edit anonymously. As a SPI volunteer, you should know that you should prove evidence, and this seems like a bad-faith block here. Sceptre ( talk) 11:22, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Hate to say it, but I was looking at this CSD nom, and came to the conclusion that while I don't know if there will ever BE an I-2 (and doubt the road is notable at this point), that page wasn't a hoax. (See [1] It is bureaucratic nonsense, but again, not a G3) Courcelles 04:09, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Rschen7754! Can we run a quick sleeper check on the latest Bundy socks? I could file a SPI otherwise: and it may need to be done anyway. These types truly make WP suck. Cheers... Doc talk 08:54, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Okay - it won't be my first! You should be a CU, IMHO. Thanks for your help with this person! Doc talk 09:23, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
If you want to continue to receive the next issues every week, please subscribe to the newsletter. You can subscribe your personal talk page and a community page like this one. The newsletter can be translated into your language.
You can also become a tech ambassador, help us write the next newsletter and tell us what to improve. Your feedback is greatly appreciated. guillom 20:23, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
The above review has been inactive for 30 days, and this is the required notification of that effect, per WP:HWY/ACR. Interested editors are encouraged to enter "Keep" or "Remove" declarations, or continue working on the article to ensure that it will remain at A-Class standards. If no attempts are made to work on the article, and a net 3 Remove declarations have not been entered, the article will remain at A-Class. -- Rs chen 7754 23:51, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk)
13:53, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Rschen7754, I'm working on a project to study the running of WikiProject and possible performance measures for it. I learn from WikiProject U.S. Roads talk page that you are an active member of the project. I would like to invite you to take a short survey for my study. If you are available to take our survey, could you please reply an email to me? I'm new to Wikipedia, I can't send too many emails to other editors due to anti-spam measure. Thank you very much for your time. Xiangju ( talk) 17:22, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Why have you left a talkback notice on my page? Spinning Spark 23:10, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for [17]. Because all three user pages are redlinks (which I knew while creating the report), and because the page doesn't display "User:User:" links but seemingly correct "User:" links, I wasn't aware that what I saw wasn't what I got (if one of them should have been blue instead of red, it would have been more obvious). Not the most intuitive interface. Fram ( talk) 09:19, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
TheSyndromeOfaDown is a suspected sockpuppet of a user you have banned (See his talk), and has seemed to from thin air, weighed in on a discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Australian_Roads#AUshielding_conversions, with some particularly strong opinions. The specific post is a little above the horizontal rule you will find if you scroll down. I though this may be of interest to any currently running investigations. -- Nbound ( talk) 21:18, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Also, see his talk page for more info. Thanks. WorldTraveller101( Trouble?/ My Work) 20:18, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
AutomaticStrikeout
? is wishing you a Happy
Memorial Day! On this day, we recognize our fellow countrymen who have fought our nation's battles for the past several hundred years, protecting our freedom and safety. We remember those who paid the ultimate price and we support those who continue to willingly sacrifice their safety for the sake of their country. Happy Memorial Day!
Share this message by adding {{ subst:Memorial Day}} to a fellow American's talk page.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please inform other users about these changes.
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by Global message delivery • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Unsubscribe.
Please review Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thenightchicagodied as this user is back to socking. Thank you. Technical 13 ( talk) 18:48, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Apologies for editing the archive... did not have an idea about it. Thanks for pointing it out though. Amit ( talk) 05:02, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
What do you think of 71.145.140.37 ( talk)? -- Redrose64 ( talk) 09:06, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
No worries on the revert. I got no edit conflict warning, so didn't see Dennis had closed. I suspect the comment reached the intended recipient anyway. Cheers. Begoon talk 16:47, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
You recently edited this and seem to deal with these things often, so I figured you might know something.
It looks like including a map causes the country param to be required. There is no documentation indicating that this is the case. In fact, the template page lists country as only being for numbered routes. I noticed this on the previous version of the Sunset Blvd page. The person added the infobox with a map. It shows a glaring Script Error text. Since Sunset Blvd isn't a numbered route, there should be no need for a country and state. Including these params adds the section on highways in California, which Sunset Blvd obviously is not.
The backing module specifically mentions that country is required for maps. It seems like a strange requirement. Is this supposed to be the case? If it is, that should probably be mentioned on the template page. lukini ( talk | contribs) 18:58, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Sorry about joining the sockpuppet investigations channel with the nick sockpuppet, as given I'm new to Wikipedia IRC, I didn't realize harmless self humor such as that would constitute a ban from the channel. Are all Wikipedia IRC channels like that in the way of a serious nature?-- 1966batfan ( talk) 03:07, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Template:I-79 aux has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
JJ98 (
Talk)
06:00, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Interstate 8, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Switchback ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:05, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please inform other users about these changes.
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by Global message delivery • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
All OK. -- Rs chen 7754 22:52, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
I have already stop using the account chihonglee and I have already stoped requesting permissions on other wikis, only on wikiversity. Also, every time I request for the permission, you also opposite for the same reason, so do you mean that I will not get any permission for ever?-- Gabrielchihonglee ( talk) 07:48, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
I believe you are incorrect; i have cited policy for WikiProject tagging in my edit summaries. if you revert my edits, then to my understanding of policy, you are being disruptive. Please read the relevant policy, which i have linked to here. Note this is a highlighted policy point (which i did not contribute to). I understand how you feel about the Cal roads project (which is obviously an incredibly well organized project, with great results), but its a project, which is a social construct, and i am stating, as an active member of WikiProject California/SFBA task force, that roads which lie entirely within the state of california are to be included in the California Wikiproject and its task forces. I have removed task forces where the road goes through more than that task forces scope, such as california 1, as that seems like excessive tagging (which i am happy to discuss with members of the cali project if they disagree). In case you are curious, i am not doing this to increase the number of GA/FA articles at the cali projects, as i have probably added about 1,000 stub articles to the project, which doesnt help it look better. I am interested in making sure the California and in particular the sfba wikiprojects are reasonably complete, which doesnt affect the work of other projects in the slightest. I wont revert your reverts, but i may bring any reverts up at ANI, for clarification. Mercurywoodrose ( talk) 03:28, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers:
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.-- Dom497 ( talk) This message was sent out by -- EdwardsBot ( talk) 14:50, 9 June 2013 (UTC) |
Hi Rschen7754, I believe you are either a checkuser or clerk? Could you have a look at the TenMuses SPI and advise if anything is missing to go to next stage? I only ask since there are RMs ticking on that TenMuses precipated. Many thanks. In ictu oculi ( talk) 04:05, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello Rschen. As an experienced SPI clerk, I wonder if you might offer some advice. I re-opened WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Nickaang yesterday, after noticing his latest SP while doing NPP. The promotional tone of the article prompted me to look at the log, which showed that it had recently been deleted G5. But it would be tedious to do this for every new article I look at. How can a non-admin look for articles that have previously been speedied G5? Is there a log of G5'd articles somewhere, that isn't admin-only? Parsing user CSD logs one by one would be impractical, but if there were a central log, then I could write a SP hunting app, or add a feature to an existing utility. There are plenty of anti-vandalism tools, but no tools for sniffing out evidence of potential SPs that I can find. Thanks, Captain Conundrum ( talk) 09:01, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
The template was full of errors - don't you actually look at what you produce? There was a big red error message. Further, it has references to google which are not within WP:RS. I toyed with the idea of {{ db-g1}} first John of Cromer in transit ( talk) mytime= Tue 12:53, wikitime= 11:53, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
If it's not broken, why is it still sitting on Category:Pages with missing references list? Why don't you use your sandbox correctly, write a template correctly, instead of puting live tosh like this which has been broken more than one day (and is still there)? Use your time productively rather than bleat about other people who do. Why don't you pay attention to error messages? John of Cromer in transit ( talk) mytime= Wed 10:17, wikitime= 09:17, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please inform other users about these changes.
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by Global message delivery • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Unsubscribe.
20:04, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Since you’ve just blocked the user that prompted me to ask this Help Desk question about dealing with block evasion, I was wondering if you might be able to answer it. Thanks. — Frungi ( talk) 20:30, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello Rschen, Would you mind removing my reviewer and rollbacker rights? Currently they are useless due to matters surrounding my enwiki account and on one/two occasions I have accidentally used them. So, removal is purely based on retirement of all non account related work. Thanks, John F. Lewis ( talk) 12:34, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi there - I noticed your name at the Meetup LA8 page for the wicnic so I thought 1920s in Los Angeles might interest you. If not, no worries. -- Rosiestep ( talk) 21:33, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Soulflytribe where the page does not display a link to the archive. Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 14:04, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please inform other users about these changes. Translations are available.
__DISAMBIG__
to mark disambiguation pages.
[58]Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by Global message delivery • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Unsubscribe. 00:27, 17 June 2013 (UTC)