![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
I will ask the editors, admins to review your controversial posts as quite biased based on your contributions to wikipedia to violate the very foundation of neutral view the goal of wikipedia is not an opinion based resource. You can create your own blog if you want to argue what is science vs whatever you choose to argue about. I checked your history and it's very clear that you have biases and you are prolific in trolling and spamming wikipedia with your content to assert your biases. CristieJ ( talk) 09:58, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
I was in the middle of signing when you edited this page... again intimidation tactics Roxy, the dog. You don't own wikipedia, you cannot proliferate content with your own biases and you clearly lack neutral view CristieJ ( talk) 09:58, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Roxy, the dog. In compliance with reporting you -- Please reference the Talk section of the reverted article that shows clear bias, which has been reported for the following:
Galobtter Please note the following:
Crystal Healing: [ [1]]
1. Lack of Neutral point of view in content and language to show bias for science and scientific study in an article clearly about: Crystals and Crystal healing. This is an opinion piece thinly disguised as educating people on Crystal healing. 2. Requests an editorial and admin POV check on the the entire article for using very strong biases in wording to substantiate it's claims that Crystal healing is not a science even though it doesn't claim it is a science... 3. Claiming editorial wars when wikipedia guidelines show that ANYONE can edit the articles and author in attempting to maintain opinion and bias by reverting edited content that was addressing the topic from a neutral perspective.
See referenced, the violations noted 1, 2 in dispute : [ [2]]
CristieJ ( talk) 10:39, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
How is Dailymail an unreliable source? -- Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 11:57, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
No, it is a list of common foods. Æbleskiver is mostly eaten at dinner, and very rarely at breakfast. » Shadowowl | talk 14:55, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
List of breakfast foods, did not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. I very much doubt
Rat-on-a-stick is eaten for breakfast anywhere. Plus you did not cite your source.
Tyw7 (
🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (
ping me)
14:56, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
Tyw7 (
🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (
ping me)
15:20, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of breakfast foods, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bacon and eggs ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:17, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
I think that the edit that you moved on Talk:Textile belongs at the bottom of the page in the discussion of merging Textile with Clothing material. I have left a message on the editor's talk page asking him if this was his intention. Leschnei ( talk) 13:03, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Roxy, appreciate your observations.i have added the required references to the chart, The basic difference between Fabric and Performance fabric is performance.which is enhanced in these fabrics. Don't hesitate to ask me again Thanks Rajiv Sharma ( talk) 17:44, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Roxy, the dog. hello, I will add more sources, and for your queries 1. You asked ..So exactly what performance do you mean...and enhanced from what state? @@Performance, it is about the attributes of the fabrics totally opposite in a manner to achieve added functionalities (Interestingly these added attributes enhance the scope of use of those fabrics) @@enhance from what state....The added properties/performances do not belong originally to those fabrics but they are enhanced by different things see the definition.And properties of fabrics basically belongs to their origin and their polymers and polymer structure etc. But in this case, these properties are engineered to achieve added advantages. Examples of Polyester which is hydrophobic becomes water-loving(makes it useful for sportswear) and cotton is possible to behave water repel(You must have seen types of denim claiming rain guard, stain repel ) I tried to answer everything but you are welcome any time, don't stop asking, One last thing should we improve the definition part, please advise thanks Rajiv Sharma ( talk) 01:57, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Shock Brigade Harvester Boris ( talk)Hi let me elaborate it little more without repeating what is performance and enhancement, Performance fabrics they are purposefully manufactured to meet the conditions(sometimes extreme) with a predetermined objective. The originally owned properties of those fabrics also remain important in the whole consideration. Allow me to redefine and add some more relevant sources,Drifit from Nike is a more convincing example anyway thanks Rajiv Sharma ( talk) 02:39, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for butting in.
SPECIFICO
talk
12:28, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Talk:Sealioning#RfC about the inclusion of suggested ways to deal with sealioning
(Notifying everyone who participated in the previous RfC.) -- Guy Macon ( talk) 01:45, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
You were missing some references and that was the only way to let you know and I have been told before by administrators that's the best way to let someone know. Then when they have their reference for that part they can add it in st a later date Wifey93 ( talk) 17:44, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Gotcha.Get back to me Themessengerofknowledge write to me 13:01, 31 August 2015 (UTC) 19:51, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
I just saw that ANI thread about blanking. Man, did that give me deja vu. It's the same exact disconnect from the rest of the community, the same I-can't-possibly-be-wrong-about-anything-and-you'd-best-recognize-that attitude, the same hurling-insults-while-whining-about-being-bullied behavior...
For the sake of fun, the next time somebody starts whining about ad-hominem fallacies, point out that it's not actually a fallacy unless the criticism has nothing to do with the topic. So, for example, pointing out that someone probably should not be trusted with a mop because they generally act like a spoiled brat whenever any sort of conflict arises is not a fallacy. It's just a statistical syllogism. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 20:44, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
What became of Roxy? The prognosis is usually passing over 4 weeks after detection. William Harris • (talk) • 11:13, 9 September 2018 (UTC
I must have accidentally reverted you without knowing it when I reviewed diffs the other night. Damn tiny phone. Sorry! - LuckyLouie ( talk) 12:35, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
"Wikipedia Administrators Apologetics Ministry On Patrol" is currently fighting a strange rearguard action to enable a disruptive admin to get unblocked.
It is really happening [ here] and I have become obsessed in a wikiway. This obsession is unhealthy, but watching swarms of admins fawning around desperately trying to insert some kind of understanding into this fifteen year veteran editor lacking any wp:clue whatsoever is galling. HE'S BEEN HERE FIFTEEN YEARS - HE SHOULD BE TEACHING YOU GUYS ALL THAT STUFF.
- Roxy, in the middle. wooF 06:51, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
The consensus over Michael Hardy seems clear, so stop the shit-stirring or you will end up as the one who is blocked. Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 09:29, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Damn, Roxy. Sorry to see this. Get it out of your system first it you must, but I'm ready to unblock. Awaiting your commit to cease and desist. It ain't worth it. My email is always open and I review WP:UTRS.-- Dlohcierekim ( talk) 18:06, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
I thought about saying "Angry white male-ness?" Then I remembered that I'm an angry (mostly) white male. So then I thought about saying "Good-ole 'Murikan muleheadedness?" But then I realized I'm muleheaded, 'Murikan good-ole boy.
As you can imagine, I was starting to feel pretty confused at that point. But then I settled on "a fact-proof, self-centered POV" and realized that I don't have that. At least I hope I don't... ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 13:17, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Re: removing Polyester from the List of Fabrics list: Why? It is a fabric, is it not? Johnnysama ( talk) 15:43, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
I’m afk same as last year.
I may respond from time to time, and will be back to services as usual within a week from now.
Lancaster canal for the curious.
Note that I’m on an ipad and can’t be bothered to go through the ridiculous rigmaroles I need to do to corrupt that link.
Roxy, in the middle. wooF 08:57, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Clarification request: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Paranormal and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Wikipedia:Arbitration guide may be of use.
Thanks, -- Guy Macon ( talk) 03:58, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
The way your comment was formatted makes mine look like it's in reply to yours when it's actually in reply Blue Raspberry's. My formatting change to make it clear that I'm replying to Blue Raspberry. The way our comments are formatted differently gives the appearance that my comment is directed at someone it isn't actually directed at.— Mythdon ( talk • contribs) 10:15, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
you have email JarrahTree 10:18, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
I just wanted to thank you for your reply on the talk page. I think I might have misspoke when titled what I had to say as defining. I responded to your comment. Also, since I am new, how can I tell when I have sufficient support from Wiki users on the talk page to revert the article back to my changes or leave it alone? The user who disputes my edit has threatened to block my IP address if I make any more changes to the article, calling my contributions vandalism. I don't want to chance getting blocked! Thanks. Itaren ( talk) 07:31, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
I am here because I saw a recent Ryanoo edit in the Horn of Africa page and as usual he scraped the words Northeast Africa from it. This person also targeted me and harassed me because I requested Wikipedia upholds its integrity to proven facts and not be biased toward a specific racial group but this user objected to it because he wanted to push is racial views. The racist comments he spewed in the talk page of North Africa lead me to believe that this person is a white nationalist and I am baffled Wikipedia lets this user run amok. I have requested that the Northeast Africa region be created but the Wikipedia editors who work with Ryanoo objected to it. Anthropology, archaeology and dna have shown that in the past there was constant migration in the Northeast Africa corridor representing Egypt, Sudan and the Horn of Africa through the Nile Valley but the words Northeast Africa can't be used anywhere in Wikipedia because Ryanoo and his friends would censure it. This level of censorship rivals china and I am convinced Wikipedia condones it, so I request that as an Admin you look into this issue too because they are denying Horn Africans their history. Arboleh ( talk) 18:38, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
@ Roxy, in the middle. wooF I think that this is clear evidence of what I was talking about Mr. Roxy. I and other users have reported this user Arboleh before for sock puppetry and now he is trying to attack me and do the same thing as the suspected sock Itaren which is another unmistakable behavioral evidence that he is sock of Midddayexpress, This Arboleh also had disruptively edited some Wikipedia pages, attacked me, editwarred me, reported me asking for administrator intervention and now he is asking for your help exactly same as what Itaren did!!!. The Somali user Middayexpress ( has the Canadian Nationality ) is a very persistent sock puppeteer who has been using many fake accounts in order to promote his racist Afrocentric agenda and vandalize Wikipedia, this user is trying to whitewash Horn Africans and link them to Middle Easterners and North Africans while distancing Horn Africans from their other fellow East Africans brothers which is very racist. At the same time, He is trying to black-wash Middle Easterners and North Africans and linking them to horn Africans:), this guy got really no life, he has been using hundreds of sock puppet accounts in order to vandalize Wikipedia and promote his Afrocentric agenda, for example, he is trying to deattach modern Egyptians from their ancient Egyptians origins and link the Egyptian civilization to Sub Saharan Africans who have nothing at all to do with Egypt or Egyptians which is extremely racist and ridiculous!!!. I have already filed a sock puppeting report against him but It was reverted because some other user before filed a sock puppeting report against the same user and the result was inconclusive because he is using proxy. You can check his IP history and you will find that he uses only proxies and that he never logged in through a legit IP address which means that he is trying to hide something, also this account was created shortly after the block of confirmed sock puppets Middayexpress, Soupforone, Geneticanthro, ....etc and he has been making the same edits on the same pages with almost identical edit summaries. You can also check the behaviors of these accounts and Middayexpress/Soupforone, you will find that the behavioral evidence is very clear and unmistakable. I wonder how can such person get blocked and then make a new account on Wikipedia and continue vandalizing it while remains unchallenged and me who is battling such vandals and puppeteers is blamed and warned!!!! How come?!!!!Unfortunately, users like this, are why Wikipedia occasionally gets a bad name. Those Afro-centrists are 24/7 insulting us Egyptians everywhere and are doing their best to to dattach us from our ancient Egyptian origins and appropriate our heritage and culture and all our mistake is that we are Egyptians!!! which is very racist and offensive, Enough is Enough!!!!! I didn't think that I will encounter such racist people on a main source of knowledge like Wikipedia. Thank you. Ryanoo ( talk) 19:16, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
@ Arboleh Bring a map and look where your country Somalia is located, you will find It is located in East Africa in Sub-Saharan Africa which have nothing at all to do with Egypt which is a Mediterranean transcontinental country located in North Africa and West Asia. Love yourself and stop trying to lump yourself with Egyptians, Middle Easterners and North Africans because you guys are simply not from the MENA area. Also please stop deattaching modern Egyptians from their ancient Egyptian origins like what you did on the Page of DNA history of Egypt because it is very racist. I am an Egyptian and you know and I know that Somalis are totally different racially, genetically, racially, culturally and in every aspect from Egyptians and other MENAs. Your history is in Somalia which is an East African country in Sub-Saharan Africa, not in North Africa. Ryanoo ( talk) 19:16, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
@ Ryanoo, racists like you are what is wrong with Wikipedia and why people don't trust it, I hope unbiased Admins deal with you but I don't have a high expectation, however know this, I will continue to fight for an unbiased Wikipedia where people like you don't spread racist views or censure facts. Arboleh ( talk) 20:44, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Roxy, I read your comments where you said you’ll withhold your input until the SPI investigation is complete. Fair enough! Hope your health improves soon, health comes first! Itaren ( talk) 23:51, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello Mr. Roxy, I am a 35 years old aracheogenetist and academic lecturer in the University, I am not a teenager, so please use more decent language while talking with me like what I am doing with you, I am not a vandal or sock puppet, I am just a scientific person who hates scientific dishonesty and misleading others, I might react harsh with scientific dishonest people, but that's because I respect science and myself. I am here for editing as a volunteer, you are n't my manager or something. I really think that registering on Wikipedia should be by using Identification card to avoid vandalism and sock puppeting which will save the community here a great deal of time wasted in fighting sock puppeting and vandalism and will also give more credibility. Moreover, I don't mind at all leaving Wikipedia if they don't want good users, it is OK :). Anyway, I plan with other scientists from around the globe to create an encyclopedia in the future and who knows it could be more famous than Wikipedia one day, it is crazy but there is nothing impossible. Regards. Ryanoo ( talk) 00:27, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Arboleh ( talk) 03:28, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
You can disregard this Roxy, I have reported him to @ Doug Weller and the vandalism channel. Wish you best with your recovery. Arboleh ( talk) 04:55, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Roxy, are you wearing some special scent that makes these *cough* "special" people come out of the woodwork? Or is it just the fact that you are incredibly good looking that attracts them? -- Guy Macon ( talk) 05:02, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
I'm sorry 124.150.24.103 ( talk) 08:43, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Why have you copy/pasted everything from Rope over to Fiber rope? I'm unsure if that is vandalism or not but please refrain from duplicating articles that underwent an AfD discussion with a Keep consensus. I've reverted your edit, and if you do it again, I will report you to an admin for vandalism. I find your attitude surrounding this discussion improper. Redditaddict69 (talk) (contribs) 09:48, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Redditaddict69
(talk)
(contribs)
20:00, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Roxy the dog. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
I'm too disruptive to be allowed to vote. haha. - Roxy, the naughty dog. wooF 17:14, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Sandstein
20:09, 20 November 2018 (UTC)Roxy the dog ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Block was applied based on a spurious reading of the block log, (see comment from blocking admin below) mitigating factors of poorly applied previous blocks, (one of which was for calling a sockpuppet "not here to improve the encyclopedia", and another for criticising the admin who applied that block. A recent one for calling out the uselessness of an admin on this page where a little more lattitude is expected. Clearly I'm not disruptive, more misunderstood. Roxy, the naughty dog. wooF 17:11, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 21:21, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This is in response to your disruption at Fiber rope. In no universe is simply overwriting an article with the contents of another constructive editing. The duration is in consideration of your past disruption as per your block log. Sandstein 20:10, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Roxy the dog ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
In NRP's decline for not addressing the reason for the block, stated by Sandstein as disruption at Fibre rope it would appear to be self evident that I will not be disruptive again, as the problem I had is no longer extant. I can't see how it is actually possible to be disruptive at Fibre rope as the project is now as it ought to be in this respect. Roxy, the naughty dog. wooF 00:10, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Blocks are preventative not punishment. Roxy states "I will not be disruptive again" and I think it is reasonable to take them at their word. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 07:17, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
A question following on from this mess. Jytdog has sorted out the issue, achieving in a moment what I had been trying to do for some time. I still do not understand what he did, or how he did it without any criticism from those criticising me. How? - Roxy, the naughty dog. wooF 09:00, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Please explain your recent edit to Talk:Sir_John_Nelthorpe_School where you have added that you are an alumni of John Nelthorpe School. So am I, probably many years before you, but I don't feel the need to brag about it. I deleted your edit because I thought it was not relevant to an encyclopedia. Dsergeant ( talk) 17:53, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi there. Could I ask for some feedback on your revert of my edits to Health Australia Party? The original article was a little biased, and I've attempted to rewrite it from a NPOV. You specifically said you reverted the 'NPOV edits'. How is that constructive? MrMarkBGregory ( talk) 19:36, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
Roxy I corrected inaccuracies on Cameron Kasky' page. He wasn't shot at. He wasn't shot. He didn't even see gun fire. That makes him a bystander at most. He is not a survivor. For reference only, I witnessed a shooting outside my apartment at 3:00pm a couple of years back on my sister's birthday. I was a bystander. I was not a survivor if it served a political agenda or my own teenage need for attention. I was just a bystander. Please let my edit stand without trying to undo it. I won't make the correction to his page again until I hear back from you. I'll pray for your recovery. The sleepwalker ( talk) 03:34, 10 December 2018 (UTC)The sleepwalker
You reverted me and templated me for fixing a typo/grammer issue. Which I clearly marked as such. So why did you accuse me of vandalism? Afootpluto ( talk) 16:47, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia is biased against Anatomy, Biology, and Psychology. Wikipedia actively promotes the fringe transgender ideology, even though it violates the most fundamental laws of anatomy, biology, and reason, and it is an established fact that transgenderism is considered a mental disorder in psychology. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.0.118.41 ( talk) 21:03, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019! |
Hello Roxy the dog, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
First of all, I would like to thank you for your interest! But my previous revision did not match my current content version. I changed it 3 times. And the latest is the most complete and clear and completely different from the last time you saw it. It won't bother, if you can read every single word and every single citation that I wrote. It was completely rewritten and it was impossible to stick any errors. Give me reason and look carefully before reverting. Thank you! I spent a lot of hours writing it, you can't delete many hours in 1 second. Please don't, you are making me cry! Enrico Vandenberg ( talk) 14:18, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Why did you just alert me in the Morocco talk.-- Sakiv ( talk) 15:28, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Johnnysama (
talk •
contribs)
23:39, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
re [5]: There's no agreement it exists (nearly 2 in 3 said it didn't), so why edit like it does? -- Middle 8 ( t • c | privacy • acupuncture COI?) 11:55, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
As you did here. -- Green C 00:46, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
I have closed this thread (
[6]), where you made a personal remark (Grow up, and grow a thicker skin
) that probably cannot be justified. Looking through your talk page posts for the past month, there seem to be a pattern of combative tone (I have not looked further; it may well be just isolated events). I am somewhat familiar with your work, and perhaps it's just me but these recent tone seem to be escalating. May I ask if you could be slightly more mindful? Thanks, and happy new year.
Alex Shih (
talk)
08:01, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Following the edits you made at Fiber rope recently. You said you would stop if your week-long block was removed early. Keep it up and I will get an admin involved again and prove that your block was ineffective, and that a new one should be reinstated with a longer time on it. Please do not reply to this with any personal attacks or you will only be proving my point. –– Redditaddict69 (talk) (contribs) 06:16, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
I am going to stop responding to a certain criticism. I don't see further discussion as being productive. Please consider dropping it as well. Or dropping it into a well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hYItcm_daM -- Guy Macon ( talk) 18:39, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
| .--. | ______.-------| | | (_____( | |\\\\| | __..--``--.._ __/ `-------| |---, | ``--..____.--'| \ ___ | | || | __..--``--.._ | | | | | | | || | ``--..___| | | |___| | | || The plug is pulled. `--.|_/ | | || Ignored is the disruptive one. ____\ .-------| |---` Feed him I will not. (_____( | |\\\\| | `-------| | | `--`
Hi Roxy. I see you share my concerns. I've never really looked at the Vital Article project, but this introduction has me quite worried. Have you ever done work with the project or had other interactions with editors who do? -- Ronz ( talk) 20:56, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
I just wanted to let you know that Ferryhill does have a history society, which was deleted from the page. Darrellsnixon ( talk) 22:44, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
This pretty much explains everything we see on Wikipedia: [7] I'm just saying. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 16:27, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Ice hockey. Boxing with sticks. Only in death does duty end ( talk) 01:31, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
I noticed by your characterization of my edits as "disgustingly bad" and your statment that something should "be done about it". It's a shame that you see me in this way, as I think our ultimate goals for the Rope worms article are basically the same, we both seem to want a factual and well sourced article that makes it clear the rope worms are not parasites and that enemas of ClO2 are harmful (I know that is what I want, and I assume you want the same). We disagree about how best to word things, but I still think we have the same goals and can work together to improve the article. I was arguably edit warring, which was a mistake, but as for the edits themselves, what did you find "disgustingly bad" about them? If you are confused by anything I say, don't be afraid to ask. Tornado chaser ( talk) 20:28, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
The best we can do is be honest...Yes, honest is saying "chlorine dioxide (a type of bleach)", this is perfectly accurate and is consistent with the sources. Tornado chaser ( talk) 00:59, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Jytdog has been banned by the Arbitration Committee notwithstanding your birthday wishes. Eschoryii ( talk) 01:28, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The 2018 Cure Award |
In 2018 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs. |
Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 17:41, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Can you please explain why you're deleting an entire article - including valid references - without any prior discussion or warning? Your revision comment is: "Rvting to last stable (not effected by a COI edit) version". It is not clear that there is a COI. Check the article prior to your edit: the COI label was removed! There are more than four international groups working on this subject, all of which are represented in the article. 28 publications are listed in the references, from everyone working in this field - including reviews and meta-studies - so where is the COI? There were criticisms to missing references which we had painstakingly added. All this was undone by your edit. Wikipedia is meant to work by consensus, not by solitary 'drive-by' edits and reversions. So, please explain why you did this. Logicwhatelse ( talk) 16:03, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Another comment: have you actually looked at the article you reverted to? Can you explain the rationale behind EIGHT references left 'hanging' in the article without any supporting content? And what is this article actually about now? There is no meaningful content any more. It's ridiculous! Logicwhatelse ( talk) 16:09, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This page in a nutshell: Do not edit Wikipedia in your own interests, nor in the interests of your external relationships. |
I'm not sure why you keeping removing the list of music videos that the Deaton-Flanigen team has directed, but they are supposed to be on their page for reference and information purposes. There are other music video directors (particularly in the country music field: Shaun Silva, Trey Fanjoy, Michael Salomon, Steven Goldmann, Wes Edwards, Peter Zavadil...just to name a few, and I welcome you to check those pages out) whose Wikipedia pages include a section of a list of videos they directed as a means of info and references, and nobody has ever deleted those sections. I only bring this up because I had this exact same problem with another Wikipedia user here who tried to give me an argument about how the Deaton-Flanigen Wikipedia page is "not the company website," and I tried to give this user this same explanation. Zredman ( talk) 15:44, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Highly entertaining discussion of the talk page of our favorite COI toothologist. A nod's as good as a wink to a blind bat, eh? (rubs elbow) [8] -- Guy Macon ( talk) 17:09, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
I will ask the editors, admins to review your controversial posts as quite biased based on your contributions to wikipedia to violate the very foundation of neutral view the goal of wikipedia is not an opinion based resource. You can create your own blog if you want to argue what is science vs whatever you choose to argue about. I checked your history and it's very clear that you have biases and you are prolific in trolling and spamming wikipedia with your content to assert your biases. CristieJ ( talk) 09:58, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
I was in the middle of signing when you edited this page... again intimidation tactics Roxy, the dog. You don't own wikipedia, you cannot proliferate content with your own biases and you clearly lack neutral view CristieJ ( talk) 09:58, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Roxy, the dog. In compliance with reporting you -- Please reference the Talk section of the reverted article that shows clear bias, which has been reported for the following:
Galobtter Please note the following:
Crystal Healing: [ [1]]
1. Lack of Neutral point of view in content and language to show bias for science and scientific study in an article clearly about: Crystals and Crystal healing. This is an opinion piece thinly disguised as educating people on Crystal healing. 2. Requests an editorial and admin POV check on the the entire article for using very strong biases in wording to substantiate it's claims that Crystal healing is not a science even though it doesn't claim it is a science... 3. Claiming editorial wars when wikipedia guidelines show that ANYONE can edit the articles and author in attempting to maintain opinion and bias by reverting edited content that was addressing the topic from a neutral perspective.
See referenced, the violations noted 1, 2 in dispute : [ [2]]
CristieJ ( talk) 10:39, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
How is Dailymail an unreliable source? -- Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 11:57, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
No, it is a list of common foods. Æbleskiver is mostly eaten at dinner, and very rarely at breakfast. » Shadowowl | talk 14:55, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
List of breakfast foods, did not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. I very much doubt
Rat-on-a-stick is eaten for breakfast anywhere. Plus you did not cite your source.
Tyw7 (
🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (
ping me)
14:56, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
Tyw7 (
🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (
ping me)
15:20, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of breakfast foods, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bacon and eggs ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:17, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
I think that the edit that you moved on Talk:Textile belongs at the bottom of the page in the discussion of merging Textile with Clothing material. I have left a message on the editor's talk page asking him if this was his intention. Leschnei ( talk) 13:03, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Roxy, appreciate your observations.i have added the required references to the chart, The basic difference between Fabric and Performance fabric is performance.which is enhanced in these fabrics. Don't hesitate to ask me again Thanks Rajiv Sharma ( talk) 17:44, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Roxy, the dog. hello, I will add more sources, and for your queries 1. You asked ..So exactly what performance do you mean...and enhanced from what state? @@Performance, it is about the attributes of the fabrics totally opposite in a manner to achieve added functionalities (Interestingly these added attributes enhance the scope of use of those fabrics) @@enhance from what state....The added properties/performances do not belong originally to those fabrics but they are enhanced by different things see the definition.And properties of fabrics basically belongs to their origin and their polymers and polymer structure etc. But in this case, these properties are engineered to achieve added advantages. Examples of Polyester which is hydrophobic becomes water-loving(makes it useful for sportswear) and cotton is possible to behave water repel(You must have seen types of denim claiming rain guard, stain repel ) I tried to answer everything but you are welcome any time, don't stop asking, One last thing should we improve the definition part, please advise thanks Rajiv Sharma ( talk) 01:57, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Shock Brigade Harvester Boris ( talk)Hi let me elaborate it little more without repeating what is performance and enhancement, Performance fabrics they are purposefully manufactured to meet the conditions(sometimes extreme) with a predetermined objective. The originally owned properties of those fabrics also remain important in the whole consideration. Allow me to redefine and add some more relevant sources,Drifit from Nike is a more convincing example anyway thanks Rajiv Sharma ( talk) 02:39, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for butting in.
SPECIFICO
talk
12:28, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Talk:Sealioning#RfC about the inclusion of suggested ways to deal with sealioning
(Notifying everyone who participated in the previous RfC.) -- Guy Macon ( talk) 01:45, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
You were missing some references and that was the only way to let you know and I have been told before by administrators that's the best way to let someone know. Then when they have their reference for that part they can add it in st a later date Wifey93 ( talk) 17:44, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Gotcha.Get back to me Themessengerofknowledge write to me 13:01, 31 August 2015 (UTC) 19:51, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
I just saw that ANI thread about blanking. Man, did that give me deja vu. It's the same exact disconnect from the rest of the community, the same I-can't-possibly-be-wrong-about-anything-and-you'd-best-recognize-that attitude, the same hurling-insults-while-whining-about-being-bullied behavior...
For the sake of fun, the next time somebody starts whining about ad-hominem fallacies, point out that it's not actually a fallacy unless the criticism has nothing to do with the topic. So, for example, pointing out that someone probably should not be trusted with a mop because they generally act like a spoiled brat whenever any sort of conflict arises is not a fallacy. It's just a statistical syllogism. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 20:44, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
What became of Roxy? The prognosis is usually passing over 4 weeks after detection. William Harris • (talk) • 11:13, 9 September 2018 (UTC
I must have accidentally reverted you without knowing it when I reviewed diffs the other night. Damn tiny phone. Sorry! - LuckyLouie ( talk) 12:35, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
"Wikipedia Administrators Apologetics Ministry On Patrol" is currently fighting a strange rearguard action to enable a disruptive admin to get unblocked.
It is really happening [ here] and I have become obsessed in a wikiway. This obsession is unhealthy, but watching swarms of admins fawning around desperately trying to insert some kind of understanding into this fifteen year veteran editor lacking any wp:clue whatsoever is galling. HE'S BEEN HERE FIFTEEN YEARS - HE SHOULD BE TEACHING YOU GUYS ALL THAT STUFF.
- Roxy, in the middle. wooF 06:51, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
The consensus over Michael Hardy seems clear, so stop the shit-stirring or you will end up as the one who is blocked. Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 09:29, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Damn, Roxy. Sorry to see this. Get it out of your system first it you must, but I'm ready to unblock. Awaiting your commit to cease and desist. It ain't worth it. My email is always open and I review WP:UTRS.-- Dlohcierekim ( talk) 18:06, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
I thought about saying "Angry white male-ness?" Then I remembered that I'm an angry (mostly) white male. So then I thought about saying "Good-ole 'Murikan muleheadedness?" But then I realized I'm muleheaded, 'Murikan good-ole boy.
As you can imagine, I was starting to feel pretty confused at that point. But then I settled on "a fact-proof, self-centered POV" and realized that I don't have that. At least I hope I don't... ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 13:17, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Re: removing Polyester from the List of Fabrics list: Why? It is a fabric, is it not? Johnnysama ( talk) 15:43, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
I’m afk same as last year.
I may respond from time to time, and will be back to services as usual within a week from now.
Lancaster canal for the curious.
Note that I’m on an ipad and can’t be bothered to go through the ridiculous rigmaroles I need to do to corrupt that link.
Roxy, in the middle. wooF 08:57, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Clarification request: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Paranormal and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Wikipedia:Arbitration guide may be of use.
Thanks, -- Guy Macon ( talk) 03:58, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
The way your comment was formatted makes mine look like it's in reply to yours when it's actually in reply Blue Raspberry's. My formatting change to make it clear that I'm replying to Blue Raspberry. The way our comments are formatted differently gives the appearance that my comment is directed at someone it isn't actually directed at.— Mythdon ( talk • contribs) 10:15, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
you have email JarrahTree 10:18, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
I just wanted to thank you for your reply on the talk page. I think I might have misspoke when titled what I had to say as defining. I responded to your comment. Also, since I am new, how can I tell when I have sufficient support from Wiki users on the talk page to revert the article back to my changes or leave it alone? The user who disputes my edit has threatened to block my IP address if I make any more changes to the article, calling my contributions vandalism. I don't want to chance getting blocked! Thanks. Itaren ( talk) 07:31, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
I am here because I saw a recent Ryanoo edit in the Horn of Africa page and as usual he scraped the words Northeast Africa from it. This person also targeted me and harassed me because I requested Wikipedia upholds its integrity to proven facts and not be biased toward a specific racial group but this user objected to it because he wanted to push is racial views. The racist comments he spewed in the talk page of North Africa lead me to believe that this person is a white nationalist and I am baffled Wikipedia lets this user run amok. I have requested that the Northeast Africa region be created but the Wikipedia editors who work with Ryanoo objected to it. Anthropology, archaeology and dna have shown that in the past there was constant migration in the Northeast Africa corridor representing Egypt, Sudan and the Horn of Africa through the Nile Valley but the words Northeast Africa can't be used anywhere in Wikipedia because Ryanoo and his friends would censure it. This level of censorship rivals china and I am convinced Wikipedia condones it, so I request that as an Admin you look into this issue too because they are denying Horn Africans their history. Arboleh ( talk) 18:38, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
@ Roxy, in the middle. wooF I think that this is clear evidence of what I was talking about Mr. Roxy. I and other users have reported this user Arboleh before for sock puppetry and now he is trying to attack me and do the same thing as the suspected sock Itaren which is another unmistakable behavioral evidence that he is sock of Midddayexpress, This Arboleh also had disruptively edited some Wikipedia pages, attacked me, editwarred me, reported me asking for administrator intervention and now he is asking for your help exactly same as what Itaren did!!!. The Somali user Middayexpress ( has the Canadian Nationality ) is a very persistent sock puppeteer who has been using many fake accounts in order to promote his racist Afrocentric agenda and vandalize Wikipedia, this user is trying to whitewash Horn Africans and link them to Middle Easterners and North Africans while distancing Horn Africans from their other fellow East Africans brothers which is very racist. At the same time, He is trying to black-wash Middle Easterners and North Africans and linking them to horn Africans:), this guy got really no life, he has been using hundreds of sock puppet accounts in order to vandalize Wikipedia and promote his Afrocentric agenda, for example, he is trying to deattach modern Egyptians from their ancient Egyptians origins and link the Egyptian civilization to Sub Saharan Africans who have nothing at all to do with Egypt or Egyptians which is extremely racist and ridiculous!!!. I have already filed a sock puppeting report against him but It was reverted because some other user before filed a sock puppeting report against the same user and the result was inconclusive because he is using proxy. You can check his IP history and you will find that he uses only proxies and that he never logged in through a legit IP address which means that he is trying to hide something, also this account was created shortly after the block of confirmed sock puppets Middayexpress, Soupforone, Geneticanthro, ....etc and he has been making the same edits on the same pages with almost identical edit summaries. You can also check the behaviors of these accounts and Middayexpress/Soupforone, you will find that the behavioral evidence is very clear and unmistakable. I wonder how can such person get blocked and then make a new account on Wikipedia and continue vandalizing it while remains unchallenged and me who is battling such vandals and puppeteers is blamed and warned!!!! How come?!!!!Unfortunately, users like this, are why Wikipedia occasionally gets a bad name. Those Afro-centrists are 24/7 insulting us Egyptians everywhere and are doing their best to to dattach us from our ancient Egyptian origins and appropriate our heritage and culture and all our mistake is that we are Egyptians!!! which is very racist and offensive, Enough is Enough!!!!! I didn't think that I will encounter such racist people on a main source of knowledge like Wikipedia. Thank you. Ryanoo ( talk) 19:16, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
@ Arboleh Bring a map and look where your country Somalia is located, you will find It is located in East Africa in Sub-Saharan Africa which have nothing at all to do with Egypt which is a Mediterranean transcontinental country located in North Africa and West Asia. Love yourself and stop trying to lump yourself with Egyptians, Middle Easterners and North Africans because you guys are simply not from the MENA area. Also please stop deattaching modern Egyptians from their ancient Egyptian origins like what you did on the Page of DNA history of Egypt because it is very racist. I am an Egyptian and you know and I know that Somalis are totally different racially, genetically, racially, culturally and in every aspect from Egyptians and other MENAs. Your history is in Somalia which is an East African country in Sub-Saharan Africa, not in North Africa. Ryanoo ( talk) 19:16, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
@ Ryanoo, racists like you are what is wrong with Wikipedia and why people don't trust it, I hope unbiased Admins deal with you but I don't have a high expectation, however know this, I will continue to fight for an unbiased Wikipedia where people like you don't spread racist views or censure facts. Arboleh ( talk) 20:44, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Roxy, I read your comments where you said you’ll withhold your input until the SPI investigation is complete. Fair enough! Hope your health improves soon, health comes first! Itaren ( talk) 23:51, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello Mr. Roxy, I am a 35 years old aracheogenetist and academic lecturer in the University, I am not a teenager, so please use more decent language while talking with me like what I am doing with you, I am not a vandal or sock puppet, I am just a scientific person who hates scientific dishonesty and misleading others, I might react harsh with scientific dishonest people, but that's because I respect science and myself. I am here for editing as a volunteer, you are n't my manager or something. I really think that registering on Wikipedia should be by using Identification card to avoid vandalism and sock puppeting which will save the community here a great deal of time wasted in fighting sock puppeting and vandalism and will also give more credibility. Moreover, I don't mind at all leaving Wikipedia if they don't want good users, it is OK :). Anyway, I plan with other scientists from around the globe to create an encyclopedia in the future and who knows it could be more famous than Wikipedia one day, it is crazy but there is nothing impossible. Regards. Ryanoo ( talk) 00:27, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Arboleh ( talk) 03:28, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
You can disregard this Roxy, I have reported him to @ Doug Weller and the vandalism channel. Wish you best with your recovery. Arboleh ( talk) 04:55, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Roxy, are you wearing some special scent that makes these *cough* "special" people come out of the woodwork? Or is it just the fact that you are incredibly good looking that attracts them? -- Guy Macon ( talk) 05:02, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
I'm sorry 124.150.24.103 ( talk) 08:43, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Why have you copy/pasted everything from Rope over to Fiber rope? I'm unsure if that is vandalism or not but please refrain from duplicating articles that underwent an AfD discussion with a Keep consensus. I've reverted your edit, and if you do it again, I will report you to an admin for vandalism. I find your attitude surrounding this discussion improper. Redditaddict69 (talk) (contribs) 09:48, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Redditaddict69
(talk)
(contribs)
20:00, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Roxy the dog. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
I'm too disruptive to be allowed to vote. haha. - Roxy, the naughty dog. wooF 17:14, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Sandstein
20:09, 20 November 2018 (UTC)Roxy the dog ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Block was applied based on a spurious reading of the block log, (see comment from blocking admin below) mitigating factors of poorly applied previous blocks, (one of which was for calling a sockpuppet "not here to improve the encyclopedia", and another for criticising the admin who applied that block. A recent one for calling out the uselessness of an admin on this page where a little more lattitude is expected. Clearly I'm not disruptive, more misunderstood. Roxy, the naughty dog. wooF 17:11, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 21:21, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This is in response to your disruption at Fiber rope. In no universe is simply overwriting an article with the contents of another constructive editing. The duration is in consideration of your past disruption as per your block log. Sandstein 20:10, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Roxy the dog ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
In NRP's decline for not addressing the reason for the block, stated by Sandstein as disruption at Fibre rope it would appear to be self evident that I will not be disruptive again, as the problem I had is no longer extant. I can't see how it is actually possible to be disruptive at Fibre rope as the project is now as it ought to be in this respect. Roxy, the naughty dog. wooF 00:10, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Blocks are preventative not punishment. Roxy states "I will not be disruptive again" and I think it is reasonable to take them at their word. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 07:17, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
A question following on from this mess. Jytdog has sorted out the issue, achieving in a moment what I had been trying to do for some time. I still do not understand what he did, or how he did it without any criticism from those criticising me. How? - Roxy, the naughty dog. wooF 09:00, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Please explain your recent edit to Talk:Sir_John_Nelthorpe_School where you have added that you are an alumni of John Nelthorpe School. So am I, probably many years before you, but I don't feel the need to brag about it. I deleted your edit because I thought it was not relevant to an encyclopedia. Dsergeant ( talk) 17:53, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi there. Could I ask for some feedback on your revert of my edits to Health Australia Party? The original article was a little biased, and I've attempted to rewrite it from a NPOV. You specifically said you reverted the 'NPOV edits'. How is that constructive? MrMarkBGregory ( talk) 19:36, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
Roxy I corrected inaccuracies on Cameron Kasky' page. He wasn't shot at. He wasn't shot. He didn't even see gun fire. That makes him a bystander at most. He is not a survivor. For reference only, I witnessed a shooting outside my apartment at 3:00pm a couple of years back on my sister's birthday. I was a bystander. I was not a survivor if it served a political agenda or my own teenage need for attention. I was just a bystander. Please let my edit stand without trying to undo it. I won't make the correction to his page again until I hear back from you. I'll pray for your recovery. The sleepwalker ( talk) 03:34, 10 December 2018 (UTC)The sleepwalker
You reverted me and templated me for fixing a typo/grammer issue. Which I clearly marked as such. So why did you accuse me of vandalism? Afootpluto ( talk) 16:47, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia is biased against Anatomy, Biology, and Psychology. Wikipedia actively promotes the fringe transgender ideology, even though it violates the most fundamental laws of anatomy, biology, and reason, and it is an established fact that transgenderism is considered a mental disorder in psychology. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.0.118.41 ( talk) 21:03, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019! |
Hello Roxy the dog, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
First of all, I would like to thank you for your interest! But my previous revision did not match my current content version. I changed it 3 times. And the latest is the most complete and clear and completely different from the last time you saw it. It won't bother, if you can read every single word and every single citation that I wrote. It was completely rewritten and it was impossible to stick any errors. Give me reason and look carefully before reverting. Thank you! I spent a lot of hours writing it, you can't delete many hours in 1 second. Please don't, you are making me cry! Enrico Vandenberg ( talk) 14:18, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Why did you just alert me in the Morocco talk.-- Sakiv ( talk) 15:28, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Johnnysama (
talk •
contribs)
23:39, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
re [5]: There's no agreement it exists (nearly 2 in 3 said it didn't), so why edit like it does? -- Middle 8 ( t • c | privacy • acupuncture COI?) 11:55, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
As you did here. -- Green C 00:46, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
I have closed this thread (
[6]), where you made a personal remark (Grow up, and grow a thicker skin
) that probably cannot be justified. Looking through your talk page posts for the past month, there seem to be a pattern of combative tone (I have not looked further; it may well be just isolated events). I am somewhat familiar with your work, and perhaps it's just me but these recent tone seem to be escalating. May I ask if you could be slightly more mindful? Thanks, and happy new year.
Alex Shih (
talk)
08:01, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Following the edits you made at Fiber rope recently. You said you would stop if your week-long block was removed early. Keep it up and I will get an admin involved again and prove that your block was ineffective, and that a new one should be reinstated with a longer time on it. Please do not reply to this with any personal attacks or you will only be proving my point. –– Redditaddict69 (talk) (contribs) 06:16, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
I am going to stop responding to a certain criticism. I don't see further discussion as being productive. Please consider dropping it as well. Or dropping it into a well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hYItcm_daM -- Guy Macon ( talk) 18:39, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
| .--. | ______.-------| | | (_____( | |\\\\| | __..--``--.._ __/ `-------| |---, | ``--..____.--'| \ ___ | | || | __..--``--.._ | | | | | | | || | ``--..___| | | |___| | | || The plug is pulled. `--.|_/ | | || Ignored is the disruptive one. ____\ .-------| |---` Feed him I will not. (_____( | |\\\\| | `-------| | | `--`
Hi Roxy. I see you share my concerns. I've never really looked at the Vital Article project, but this introduction has me quite worried. Have you ever done work with the project or had other interactions with editors who do? -- Ronz ( talk) 20:56, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
I just wanted to let you know that Ferryhill does have a history society, which was deleted from the page. Darrellsnixon ( talk) 22:44, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
This pretty much explains everything we see on Wikipedia: [7] I'm just saying. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 16:27, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Ice hockey. Boxing with sticks. Only in death does duty end ( talk) 01:31, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
I noticed by your characterization of my edits as "disgustingly bad" and your statment that something should "be done about it". It's a shame that you see me in this way, as I think our ultimate goals for the Rope worms article are basically the same, we both seem to want a factual and well sourced article that makes it clear the rope worms are not parasites and that enemas of ClO2 are harmful (I know that is what I want, and I assume you want the same). We disagree about how best to word things, but I still think we have the same goals and can work together to improve the article. I was arguably edit warring, which was a mistake, but as for the edits themselves, what did you find "disgustingly bad" about them? If you are confused by anything I say, don't be afraid to ask. Tornado chaser ( talk) 20:28, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
The best we can do is be honest...Yes, honest is saying "chlorine dioxide (a type of bleach)", this is perfectly accurate and is consistent with the sources. Tornado chaser ( talk) 00:59, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Jytdog has been banned by the Arbitration Committee notwithstanding your birthday wishes. Eschoryii ( talk) 01:28, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The 2018 Cure Award |
In 2018 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs. |
Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 17:41, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Can you please explain why you're deleting an entire article - including valid references - without any prior discussion or warning? Your revision comment is: "Rvting to last stable (not effected by a COI edit) version". It is not clear that there is a COI. Check the article prior to your edit: the COI label was removed! There are more than four international groups working on this subject, all of which are represented in the article. 28 publications are listed in the references, from everyone working in this field - including reviews and meta-studies - so where is the COI? There were criticisms to missing references which we had painstakingly added. All this was undone by your edit. Wikipedia is meant to work by consensus, not by solitary 'drive-by' edits and reversions. So, please explain why you did this. Logicwhatelse ( talk) 16:03, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Another comment: have you actually looked at the article you reverted to? Can you explain the rationale behind EIGHT references left 'hanging' in the article without any supporting content? And what is this article actually about now? There is no meaningful content any more. It's ridiculous! Logicwhatelse ( talk) 16:09, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This page in a nutshell: Do not edit Wikipedia in your own interests, nor in the interests of your external relationships. |
I'm not sure why you keeping removing the list of music videos that the Deaton-Flanigen team has directed, but they are supposed to be on their page for reference and information purposes. There are other music video directors (particularly in the country music field: Shaun Silva, Trey Fanjoy, Michael Salomon, Steven Goldmann, Wes Edwards, Peter Zavadil...just to name a few, and I welcome you to check those pages out) whose Wikipedia pages include a section of a list of videos they directed as a means of info and references, and nobody has ever deleted those sections. I only bring this up because I had this exact same problem with another Wikipedia user here who tried to give me an argument about how the Deaton-Flanigen Wikipedia page is "not the company website," and I tried to give this user this same explanation. Zredman ( talk) 15:44, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Highly entertaining discussion of the talk page of our favorite COI toothologist. A nod's as good as a wink to a blind bat, eh? (rubs elbow) [8] -- Guy Macon ( talk) 17:09, 10 February 2019 (UTC)