This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 30 | ← | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 | Archive 36 | → | Archive 40 |
Merry Christmas, Rosguill | |
Or Season's Greetings or Happy Winter Solstice! |
I wish you and your loved ones a Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year. Best regards RV ( talk) 12:10, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
Happy adminship anniversary! Hi Rosguill! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your successful request for adminship. Enjoy this special day! CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:14, 23 December 2022 (UTC) |
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Rachel Levine on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:31, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
No objection to the close, but wanted to bring out that there was one voter not preferring the current target (other was the nom) who had his queries answered / responded to. So this may not have been a divided decision. Jay 💬 05:48, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi Rosguill and El C, hope you're doing well and happy holidays. I don't have space to comment in AE but I'd like to clarify one thing; it seems like Abrvagl brought up a talk page snippet from this discussion in their latest AE comment. I'm not sure if I have to reply to that or not, but it was part of a larger discussion about the wording of this stamp section in the article, among other things. The summary of it; I tried to find additional third party sources that supported the current wording ("seemingly depicting"), Abrvagl raised issues about the sources on talk (and apparently I find new things in AE they didn't mention on talk), they later asked me to take to RSN to which I replied if they think there are issues with the third party sources, they should take to RSN themselves. That's it. I haven't even used these sources in the article as I generally try to get consensus before adding something that I know will likely get contested based on the talk discussion.
What I don't understand is why are they bringing up a snippet from a larger discussion to AE without replying for a week now (as you can see my reply is the last comment) or taking to RSN? And they haven't even mentioned this discussion snippet in their initial report diffs, perhaps maybe just maybe because this isn't AE worthy at all?
p.s. Regarding that stamp not being registered by Universal Postal Union is also true which I show here with a source. For the record, it was just part of the discussion and my reply to Abrvagl's "online hysteria" comment, and I didn't even suggest adding it to the article, nor (again) I ever added it. I just find it problematic cherry-picking these snippets from large discussions without providing full context. ZaniGiovanni ( talk) 13:18, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Since you pulled back, we are running at double the backlog (two months now). Josh and I are doing most of the reviews as of late, but combined I don't think we are doing as many as you did. I've been waiting to see if you were taking a temporary break, but it appears not. If that's the case, we are going to have to ask more people to help out with redirects. If so, I'll bring this up in the next newsletter so let me know. MB 03:24, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Can you enhance the close statement for WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 22#2000 (Joey Badass mixtape)? Jay 💬 06:44, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
argued for deletion outrightpart, which you may have referred to the vote by Ss112. If someone says
I don't mind if this is deleted, but ..., I would not see it as outright, but either as a second choice, or conditional. Jay 💬 07:46, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Rosguill,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
—
Moops ⋠
T⋡
22:54, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠ T⋡ 22:54, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Rosguill,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (
talk)
03:17, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Abishe ( talk) 03:17, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Saw you tagged this for notability, then noticed the claim in the lead that they are Emmy-nominated. Now, I agree with your tag, but was interested in hearing why you think the article currently doesn't establish notability. I just want to see if it's for the same reason as I had. Oh, and Happy New Year! Onel5969 TT me 17:27, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Redirect Ninja Master Award | ||
For over 49,000 redirect reviews during 2022. - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 02:42, 2 January 2023 (UTC) |
The New Page Reviewer's Silver Award | ||
For over 2,000 article reviews during 2022. Well done! Keep up the good work! - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 02:42, 2 January 2023 (UTC) |
When you handed out a topic ban on "telegony" to Call-me-Ishmae1, did you mean Telegony (the lost poem) or Telegony (inheritance), or both? Preferably, add a blue link to their entry at Wikipedia:Editing restrictions/Unblock conditions. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 04:10, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Free Democratic Party (Germany) on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:31, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Sorry to ping again, i don't think that you would give me autopatrolled. But still I'm asking for it. Am i eligible for that? If I'm eligible then please allot me, i am going to create many more articles in future. I saw that I'm also listed in list of eligible to be Autopatrolled. Please help. --- Hey It's Patnaite☝️ (talk) 20:38, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Since you said that the this revision of the By the Way Tour article needs to have sources that provide significant coverage, are the following sources okay?
Apter, Jeff (November 23, 2004). Fornication: The Red Hot Chili Peppers Story. (page 347)
Red Hot Chili Peppers, Mullen, Brendan (October 19, 2010). An Oral/Visual History by the Red Hot Chili Peppers. (page 211)
Red Hot Chili Peppers plot first U.S. dates behind 'By the Way'
The Red Mellowed Out Chili Peppers
Red Hot Chili Peppers - Live At Slane Castle (5.1/DTS)
Tattooed Love Boys (page 3)
These sources are used in
the Tour section of the By the Way album article.
Additionally, I found these reviews of the
Live at Slane Castle DVD:
Red Hot Chili Peppers at Slane Castle 2003: a festival concert to get you through the lockdown
Are any of these sources acceptable? Thank you in advance!
Chris25689 (
talk)
08:37, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Hey, Rosguill. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the
Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman ( talk) 19:18, 3 January 2023 (UTC) |
Hi Rosguill
I have been helping Bukky Leo as a PR consultant, as you can see I have been working on his Wiki draft and submitted it several times for review, most recently I added a Guardian reference. All the references I added were notable, but I felt the Wiki was being rejected unfairly. Also Paul W told me I could subbmit notable offline references, as long as they were from notable sources, which they were via The Guardian, and Telegraph, even a chart position, but the Wiki was still getting rejected. Bukky then was contacted by someone offering to get the Wiki page verified, he definitely did not pay anyone, including me. There has been no violation of Wikipedia's policies.
In any case, I can now see this Wiki has been created, cut n pasting and editing the draft
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bukky_Leo_(Musician)
How do we now introduce links to it, do I need to find other Wiki pages that reference Bukky now?
How do I merge the page history of the draft with the new page?
Hope you can help?
Thanks
PressgirlV
PressgirlV (
talk)
21:39, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill,
Sorry to bother you, my account was blocked due to copyright infringement issues around 1 month ago and i'm not sure if this is a bug or not but my unblock request has not been reviewed and it's nearly been 2 weeks, if this is a bug, can you please review it (since you were the only one who viewed my request) or maybe put it on a waitlist for review? Here's my account's talk page.
Hopefully someone can review my request so I can continue doing my best to make Wikipedia a better place.
Thank you,
Gtgamer79 158.140.175.144 ( talk) 12:56, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi - I confirmed all of the socks but the creator, who is stale, but I've blocked as suspected. Certainly, it should be not be in article space, but it's probably eligible for G5 - can I leave you to consider that? Cheers Girth Summit (blether) 11:30, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Amendment request: Armenia-Azerbaijan_2 and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Wikipedia:Arbitration guide may be of use.
Thanks, Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 23:36, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, dear Rosguill. Happy New Year. I wish every good thing for you in 2023. I think you would be the ideal person to review the draft page I have created < Draft:The Warrior Prophet: Muhammad and War > and wonder if you would please be willing to do so, if you aren't too busy. Thanks so much. WantingOnlyTheTruth ( talk) 04:59, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Came across this editor again during NPP, with Draft:Kelly McLaughlin. Which I've obviously moved to draftspace, due to its obvious COI/UPE concerns. Then I remembered Draft:Sara Lewis, which also has obvious COI/UPE issues. Looking at the comments on their talkpage, User talk:Lindakeb, MrsSnoozyTurtle also noticed their editing habits regarding Tufts. Should this go to some admin board for looking into for COI/UPE? Onel5969 TT me 13:11, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Today While using my facebook, i searched for Wikipedia and was surfing over there and saw many Facebook Groups which provide Paid Wikipedia works one of them is "Md. Saidul Islam Rana", done by Facebook User Ameer Ali. I can send screenshots of that post. I had before added Akash Yadav (entrepreneur) for AfD is also claimed by Ameer Ali that he created that article in one of his Facebook post and many other articles. I Can surely provide screenshot for that also. How can we stop this. I pinged you because i thought you will help in this definitely. I am not so trained to start a sockpuppet investigation over this. You can scold me if I'm wrong. Thanks --- Hey It's Patnaite☝️ (talk) 19:26, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Akshata Prabhu also posted on that group regarding Wikipedia. Hey It's Patnaite☝️ (talk) 19:32, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Check those posts here [1] and [2]. Can you check these? --- Hey It's Patnaite☝️ (talk) 19:35, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Again.. User:Jonysin recreated Md. Saidul Islam Rana. Check pls . Misterrrrr ( talk) 12:07, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill! I am taking a look at how much patrols I have been doing and I saw you had done more than 3,000+ review on redirects in the past 7 days. How do you manage to do that? Do you have special bot or special method to do that, or you do it manually? Thank you very much! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 17:00, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Previously i left a message of your talkpage about a Facebook Group where Ameer Ali Salman was running Paid Wikipedia Creation Agency, Just Now i was surfing and reached that group, I tried to Find Ameer Ali Salman but is didn't got his account. Whatever, People in that group are offering people for Paid works and Some are doing there also. How can we fix that? How can i run a SPI? If i can run a SPI, then i would never ping you and make you feel bad. --- Misterrrrr ( talk) 16:07, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to updates on the Arbitration Committee's contentious topics procedure revision process.
In December, the Arbitration Committee adopted the contentious topics procedure, which replaces the former discretionary sanctions system. The contentious topics procedure is now in effect following an initial implementation period.
The drafting arbitrators warmly thank all those who have worked to implement the new procedure during this implementation period and beyond. KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 19:44, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Hey, How are you? Hope you're well.. i saw an article Nalneesh Neel, the person himself shared google knowledge graph screenshot to his Instagram Page. The creator and recent editors are sock blocked..! What we can do here? --- Misterrrrr ( talk) 17:38, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
hi. I wanted to ask about the possibility or options of being adopted by you? I could use some input. I see that you're an admin. that could be very helpful. thanks! Sm8900 ( talk) 01:25, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
That editor has already removed the discussion, but just wanted to thank you for fixing that. Onel5969 TT me 02:19, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill,
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Armenia-Azerbaijan 3. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Armenia-Azerbaijan 3/Evidence. Please add your evidence by February 10, 2023, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Armenia-Azerbaijan 3/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration.
For the Arbitration Committee, ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:49, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).
|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).
|
|
Hi
I found you on the adoption page and thought I'd ask if you would take me on.
I have tried with two other mentors initially.
Zippybonzo took me on but got busy and ToastGuard didn't have an opening when I went back.
I have also asked SoWhy but they didn't realise they were on the currently adopting list.
So here I am :)
If your interested you might have a look at the little I have contributed (and possibly the questions I have asked Zippybonzo on his Talk- some archived) and get an idea of where I am coming from and if I'd be of any interest. Lukewarmbeer ( talk) 09:44, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Where are the sources for these changes, also you are editing informaton on enacted treatys. This information was not just added, if i cant be provided with evidence for changes im going to have to assume fraud. 174.247.208.191 ( talk) 23:28, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
So im very curious to of where you got your information from today, as of now of out thin air? Also i would have to assume they should be null and void if alterable 174.247.208.191 ( talk) 23:33, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Provide sources for altering longitudes and latitudes, removing kings and queens name, changing trip to it happened o it didnt, and that the cooridinates were previously correct. 174.247.208.191 ( talk) 00:25, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Altering enacted treatys, locations, trips, longitudes and latitudes , kings and queens names without providable souces. I screen shot all of this. This was not just added. This is fraud 174.247.208.191 ( talk) 00:31, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Do what you like 174.247.208.191 ( talk) 00:33, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Unbelievable... you closed it as I was relisting it! (What were the chances for such an old discussion!) I was going to !vote to delete after relisting and then to say that moving without leaving a redirect for a redirect is just silly since there is no meaningful history to preserve but it doesn't matter now that you've done it, I'll undo the relisting if you haven't already. A7V2 ( talk) 23:37, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Hey Rosguill. I noticed that Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect autopatrol list hasn't had any archiving done since the very beginning of 2022. Do you mind if I archive some of the older requests and add them to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect autopatrol list/Old requests with the appropriate format? Just wanted to ask before I did so in case there was a reason they hadn't been archived. Hey man im josh ( talk) 00:26, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:S.U.C.C.E.S.S. on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:43, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi Rosguill. I used AWB to replace all of the instances of those templates listed in the RfD accordingly other than in archives and a few user pages that were not userspace drafts (lists of useful templates, and the like), so the RfD should be able to be closed now. Cheers! Tartar Torte 14:30, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill,
Three parties have been added to the Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 arbitration case. The evidence phase has been extended and will close on February 21, 2023.
Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Armenia-Azerbaijan 3/Evidence. Please add your evidence by February 21, 2023, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Armenia-Azerbaijan 3/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration.
For the Arbitration committee,
~ ToBeFree (
talk)
21:42, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Sword of the Spirit on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Once again hello Rosguill. If our discussion in Talk:Fyappiy keeps on "beating around the bush" (as if it's going around in circles without end). What could be done to end the dispute? WikiEditor1234567123 ( talk) 20:09, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
This is a non-content-dispute-zone, move along signed, Rosguill talk 15:32, 15 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
---|---|---|---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | |||
Reiner Gavriel, you said:
|
Hello,
I have studied documentation relevant to New pages patrol and would like to go through the training program to hone the skills.
Are you currently available as a trainer? Epifanove 💬 19:16, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
I'm very sorry to bother you once again but please take a look at Товболатов purposely spamming unrelated information here in many different articles (mainly articles about Ingush): [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]. When I returned to previous versions, he immediately reported me ( [16]) and started claiming that I remove referenced text when the only reason I remove that was because it was completely unrelated with the articles and was spam (to me it looks clear that he's trying to block objectionable user). It also looked like nationalistic editing with him highlighting the word "Chechen". WikiEditor1234567123 ( talk) 12:54, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill, I also wanted to gain your attention as you are already aware of the situation. It has come to my attention that some Ingush pages on my watchlist as mentioned here by WikiEditor1234567123 have been spammed with mulitple nationalist edits by user Товболатов. Ingush and Chechens are separate nations who are not mutually intelligible. It seems to be on ongoing issue, as I keep stumbling on these kind of edits by the same users on Ingush-related pages. It appears these users refuse to acknowledge the Ingush identity as a nation, which false under the category of nationalist editing. -- Muqale ( talk) 16:50, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 30 | ← | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 | Archive 36 | → | Archive 40 |
Merry Christmas, Rosguill | |
Or Season's Greetings or Happy Winter Solstice! |
I wish you and your loved ones a Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year. Best regards RV ( talk) 12:10, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
Happy adminship anniversary! Hi Rosguill! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your successful request for adminship. Enjoy this special day! CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:14, 23 December 2022 (UTC) |
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Rachel Levine on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:31, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
No objection to the close, but wanted to bring out that there was one voter not preferring the current target (other was the nom) who had his queries answered / responded to. So this may not have been a divided decision. Jay 💬 05:48, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi Rosguill and El C, hope you're doing well and happy holidays. I don't have space to comment in AE but I'd like to clarify one thing; it seems like Abrvagl brought up a talk page snippet from this discussion in their latest AE comment. I'm not sure if I have to reply to that or not, but it was part of a larger discussion about the wording of this stamp section in the article, among other things. The summary of it; I tried to find additional third party sources that supported the current wording ("seemingly depicting"), Abrvagl raised issues about the sources on talk (and apparently I find new things in AE they didn't mention on talk), they later asked me to take to RSN to which I replied if they think there are issues with the third party sources, they should take to RSN themselves. That's it. I haven't even used these sources in the article as I generally try to get consensus before adding something that I know will likely get contested based on the talk discussion.
What I don't understand is why are they bringing up a snippet from a larger discussion to AE without replying for a week now (as you can see my reply is the last comment) or taking to RSN? And they haven't even mentioned this discussion snippet in their initial report diffs, perhaps maybe just maybe because this isn't AE worthy at all?
p.s. Regarding that stamp not being registered by Universal Postal Union is also true which I show here with a source. For the record, it was just part of the discussion and my reply to Abrvagl's "online hysteria" comment, and I didn't even suggest adding it to the article, nor (again) I ever added it. I just find it problematic cherry-picking these snippets from large discussions without providing full context. ZaniGiovanni ( talk) 13:18, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Since you pulled back, we are running at double the backlog (two months now). Josh and I are doing most of the reviews as of late, but combined I don't think we are doing as many as you did. I've been waiting to see if you were taking a temporary break, but it appears not. If that's the case, we are going to have to ask more people to help out with redirects. If so, I'll bring this up in the next newsletter so let me know. MB 03:24, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Can you enhance the close statement for WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 22#2000 (Joey Badass mixtape)? Jay 💬 06:44, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
argued for deletion outrightpart, which you may have referred to the vote by Ss112. If someone says
I don't mind if this is deleted, but ..., I would not see it as outright, but either as a second choice, or conditional. Jay 💬 07:46, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Rosguill,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
—
Moops ⋠
T⋡
22:54, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠ T⋡ 22:54, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Rosguill,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (
talk)
03:17, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Abishe ( talk) 03:17, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Saw you tagged this for notability, then noticed the claim in the lead that they are Emmy-nominated. Now, I agree with your tag, but was interested in hearing why you think the article currently doesn't establish notability. I just want to see if it's for the same reason as I had. Oh, and Happy New Year! Onel5969 TT me 17:27, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Redirect Ninja Master Award | ||
For over 49,000 redirect reviews during 2022. - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 02:42, 2 January 2023 (UTC) |
The New Page Reviewer's Silver Award | ||
For over 2,000 article reviews during 2022. Well done! Keep up the good work! - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 02:42, 2 January 2023 (UTC) |
When you handed out a topic ban on "telegony" to Call-me-Ishmae1, did you mean Telegony (the lost poem) or Telegony (inheritance), or both? Preferably, add a blue link to their entry at Wikipedia:Editing restrictions/Unblock conditions. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 04:10, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Free Democratic Party (Germany) on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:31, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Sorry to ping again, i don't think that you would give me autopatrolled. But still I'm asking for it. Am i eligible for that? If I'm eligible then please allot me, i am going to create many more articles in future. I saw that I'm also listed in list of eligible to be Autopatrolled. Please help. --- Hey It's Patnaite☝️ (talk) 20:38, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Since you said that the this revision of the By the Way Tour article needs to have sources that provide significant coverage, are the following sources okay?
Apter, Jeff (November 23, 2004). Fornication: The Red Hot Chili Peppers Story. (page 347)
Red Hot Chili Peppers, Mullen, Brendan (October 19, 2010). An Oral/Visual History by the Red Hot Chili Peppers. (page 211)
Red Hot Chili Peppers plot first U.S. dates behind 'By the Way'
The Red Mellowed Out Chili Peppers
Red Hot Chili Peppers - Live At Slane Castle (5.1/DTS)
Tattooed Love Boys (page 3)
These sources are used in
the Tour section of the By the Way album article.
Additionally, I found these reviews of the
Live at Slane Castle DVD:
Red Hot Chili Peppers at Slane Castle 2003: a festival concert to get you through the lockdown
Are any of these sources acceptable? Thank you in advance!
Chris25689 (
talk)
08:37, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Hey, Rosguill. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the
Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman ( talk) 19:18, 3 January 2023 (UTC) |
Hi Rosguill
I have been helping Bukky Leo as a PR consultant, as you can see I have been working on his Wiki draft and submitted it several times for review, most recently I added a Guardian reference. All the references I added were notable, but I felt the Wiki was being rejected unfairly. Also Paul W told me I could subbmit notable offline references, as long as they were from notable sources, which they were via The Guardian, and Telegraph, even a chart position, but the Wiki was still getting rejected. Bukky then was contacted by someone offering to get the Wiki page verified, he definitely did not pay anyone, including me. There has been no violation of Wikipedia's policies.
In any case, I can now see this Wiki has been created, cut n pasting and editing the draft
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bukky_Leo_(Musician)
How do we now introduce links to it, do I need to find other Wiki pages that reference Bukky now?
How do I merge the page history of the draft with the new page?
Hope you can help?
Thanks
PressgirlV
PressgirlV (
talk)
21:39, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill,
Sorry to bother you, my account was blocked due to copyright infringement issues around 1 month ago and i'm not sure if this is a bug or not but my unblock request has not been reviewed and it's nearly been 2 weeks, if this is a bug, can you please review it (since you were the only one who viewed my request) or maybe put it on a waitlist for review? Here's my account's talk page.
Hopefully someone can review my request so I can continue doing my best to make Wikipedia a better place.
Thank you,
Gtgamer79 158.140.175.144 ( talk) 12:56, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi - I confirmed all of the socks but the creator, who is stale, but I've blocked as suspected. Certainly, it should be not be in article space, but it's probably eligible for G5 - can I leave you to consider that? Cheers Girth Summit (blether) 11:30, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Amendment request: Armenia-Azerbaijan_2 and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Wikipedia:Arbitration guide may be of use.
Thanks, Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 23:36, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, dear Rosguill. Happy New Year. I wish every good thing for you in 2023. I think you would be the ideal person to review the draft page I have created < Draft:The Warrior Prophet: Muhammad and War > and wonder if you would please be willing to do so, if you aren't too busy. Thanks so much. WantingOnlyTheTruth ( talk) 04:59, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Came across this editor again during NPP, with Draft:Kelly McLaughlin. Which I've obviously moved to draftspace, due to its obvious COI/UPE concerns. Then I remembered Draft:Sara Lewis, which also has obvious COI/UPE issues. Looking at the comments on their talkpage, User talk:Lindakeb, MrsSnoozyTurtle also noticed their editing habits regarding Tufts. Should this go to some admin board for looking into for COI/UPE? Onel5969 TT me 13:11, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Today While using my facebook, i searched for Wikipedia and was surfing over there and saw many Facebook Groups which provide Paid Wikipedia works one of them is "Md. Saidul Islam Rana", done by Facebook User Ameer Ali. I can send screenshots of that post. I had before added Akash Yadav (entrepreneur) for AfD is also claimed by Ameer Ali that he created that article in one of his Facebook post and many other articles. I Can surely provide screenshot for that also. How can we stop this. I pinged you because i thought you will help in this definitely. I am not so trained to start a sockpuppet investigation over this. You can scold me if I'm wrong. Thanks --- Hey It's Patnaite☝️ (talk) 19:26, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Akshata Prabhu also posted on that group regarding Wikipedia. Hey It's Patnaite☝️ (talk) 19:32, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Check those posts here [1] and [2]. Can you check these? --- Hey It's Patnaite☝️ (talk) 19:35, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Again.. User:Jonysin recreated Md. Saidul Islam Rana. Check pls . Misterrrrr ( talk) 12:07, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill! I am taking a look at how much patrols I have been doing and I saw you had done more than 3,000+ review on redirects in the past 7 days. How do you manage to do that? Do you have special bot or special method to do that, or you do it manually? Thank you very much! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 17:00, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Previously i left a message of your talkpage about a Facebook Group where Ameer Ali Salman was running Paid Wikipedia Creation Agency, Just Now i was surfing and reached that group, I tried to Find Ameer Ali Salman but is didn't got his account. Whatever, People in that group are offering people for Paid works and Some are doing there also. How can we fix that? How can i run a SPI? If i can run a SPI, then i would never ping you and make you feel bad. --- Misterrrrr ( talk) 16:07, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to updates on the Arbitration Committee's contentious topics procedure revision process.
In December, the Arbitration Committee adopted the contentious topics procedure, which replaces the former discretionary sanctions system. The contentious topics procedure is now in effect following an initial implementation period.
The drafting arbitrators warmly thank all those who have worked to implement the new procedure during this implementation period and beyond. KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 19:44, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Hey, How are you? Hope you're well.. i saw an article Nalneesh Neel, the person himself shared google knowledge graph screenshot to his Instagram Page. The creator and recent editors are sock blocked..! What we can do here? --- Misterrrrr ( talk) 17:38, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
hi. I wanted to ask about the possibility or options of being adopted by you? I could use some input. I see that you're an admin. that could be very helpful. thanks! Sm8900 ( talk) 01:25, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
That editor has already removed the discussion, but just wanted to thank you for fixing that. Onel5969 TT me 02:19, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill,
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Armenia-Azerbaijan 3. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Armenia-Azerbaijan 3/Evidence. Please add your evidence by February 10, 2023, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Armenia-Azerbaijan 3/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration.
For the Arbitration Committee, ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:49, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).
|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).
|
|
Hi
I found you on the adoption page and thought I'd ask if you would take me on.
I have tried with two other mentors initially.
Zippybonzo took me on but got busy and ToastGuard didn't have an opening when I went back.
I have also asked SoWhy but they didn't realise they were on the currently adopting list.
So here I am :)
If your interested you might have a look at the little I have contributed (and possibly the questions I have asked Zippybonzo on his Talk- some archived) and get an idea of where I am coming from and if I'd be of any interest. Lukewarmbeer ( talk) 09:44, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Where are the sources for these changes, also you are editing informaton on enacted treatys. This information was not just added, if i cant be provided with evidence for changes im going to have to assume fraud. 174.247.208.191 ( talk) 23:28, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
So im very curious to of where you got your information from today, as of now of out thin air? Also i would have to assume they should be null and void if alterable 174.247.208.191 ( talk) 23:33, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Provide sources for altering longitudes and latitudes, removing kings and queens name, changing trip to it happened o it didnt, and that the cooridinates were previously correct. 174.247.208.191 ( talk) 00:25, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Altering enacted treatys, locations, trips, longitudes and latitudes , kings and queens names without providable souces. I screen shot all of this. This was not just added. This is fraud 174.247.208.191 ( talk) 00:31, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Do what you like 174.247.208.191 ( talk) 00:33, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Unbelievable... you closed it as I was relisting it! (What were the chances for such an old discussion!) I was going to !vote to delete after relisting and then to say that moving without leaving a redirect for a redirect is just silly since there is no meaningful history to preserve but it doesn't matter now that you've done it, I'll undo the relisting if you haven't already. A7V2 ( talk) 23:37, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Hey Rosguill. I noticed that Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect autopatrol list hasn't had any archiving done since the very beginning of 2022. Do you mind if I archive some of the older requests and add them to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect autopatrol list/Old requests with the appropriate format? Just wanted to ask before I did so in case there was a reason they hadn't been archived. Hey man im josh ( talk) 00:26, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:S.U.C.C.E.S.S. on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:43, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi Rosguill. I used AWB to replace all of the instances of those templates listed in the RfD accordingly other than in archives and a few user pages that were not userspace drafts (lists of useful templates, and the like), so the RfD should be able to be closed now. Cheers! Tartar Torte 14:30, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill,
Three parties have been added to the Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 arbitration case. The evidence phase has been extended and will close on February 21, 2023.
Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Armenia-Azerbaijan 3/Evidence. Please add your evidence by February 21, 2023, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Armenia-Azerbaijan 3/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration.
For the Arbitration committee,
~ ToBeFree (
talk)
21:42, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Sword of the Spirit on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Once again hello Rosguill. If our discussion in Talk:Fyappiy keeps on "beating around the bush" (as if it's going around in circles without end). What could be done to end the dispute? WikiEditor1234567123 ( talk) 20:09, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
This is a non-content-dispute-zone, move along signed, Rosguill talk 15:32, 15 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
---|---|---|---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | |||
Reiner Gavriel, you said:
|
Hello,
I have studied documentation relevant to New pages patrol and would like to go through the training program to hone the skills.
Are you currently available as a trainer? Epifanove 💬 19:16, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
I'm very sorry to bother you once again but please take a look at Товболатов purposely spamming unrelated information here in many different articles (mainly articles about Ingush): [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]. When I returned to previous versions, he immediately reported me ( [16]) and started claiming that I remove referenced text when the only reason I remove that was because it was completely unrelated with the articles and was spam (to me it looks clear that he's trying to block objectionable user). It also looked like nationalistic editing with him highlighting the word "Chechen". WikiEditor1234567123 ( talk) 12:54, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill, I also wanted to gain your attention as you are already aware of the situation. It has come to my attention that some Ingush pages on my watchlist as mentioned here by WikiEditor1234567123 have been spammed with mulitple nationalist edits by user Товболатов. Ingush and Chechens are separate nations who are not mutually intelligible. It seems to be on ongoing issue, as I keep stumbling on these kind of edits by the same users on Ingush-related pages. It appears these users refuse to acknowledge the Ingush identity as a nation, which false under the category of nationalist editing. -- Muqale ( talk) 16:50, 16 February 2023 (UTC)