![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 50 | ← | Archive 55 | Archive 56 | Archive 57 | Archive 58 | Archive 59 | Archive 60 |
The outcomes of recent RfAs make it an opportune time to bring this up. I have considered bidding for adminship for the past week. I feel, with the new ways I am reaching out to contribute (article creations on different subjects, pending changes reviewer, Afds, DYKs, etc.) that I am gaining the knowledge required to be an admin. I intend to tackle more acts of vandalism in the coming months before I would consider taking another step foward with this idea. With all that being said, I wanted your opinion on the matter because I have always trusted you above all other experienced admins. Your complete and total honesty on my chances in the near future is appreciated. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 19:16, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
( talk page stalker) TGS, the fact that you created at least two sockpuppets to (1) impersonate a user and (2) harass another user is going to completely nuke any chances you have for adminship. The fact that you have still been apparently harassing said user is further damage. I don't see any reason that you need the tools or any evidence that you work in administrative areas. As others have said here, stick to content creation, which is what you apparently do best and what you apparently love. Softlavender ( talk) 05:05, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hyde Park, London, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kilburn and Powder magazine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:54, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
I noticed that "obvious vandalism" in User:Ritchie333/Plain and simple guide to A7 links to A3 and not G3. Thought I'd let you know as I'm not sure if I should boldly fix it. Adam9007 ( talk) 02:56, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
What is a "dog's breakfast" in this context lik you said? ★Trekker ( talk) 18:49, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Some Easter
Gwyn Hughes Jones
for you
![]() ![]() | |
"Pasg Hapus! ... Happy Easter to you" ... y geiriau. Martinevans123 ( talk) 17:50, 16 April 2017 (UTC) |
Diolch yn fawr, Martin. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:05, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Why did you delete the page it is rather important and hold mass significance in the Hearthstone community. It is even cited in a couple articles here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Odenk2 ( talk • contribs) 22:54, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
Hopefully, others and myself can make enough edits to make it a full blown article. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Odenk2 ( talk • contribs) 20:44, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie333
Hope you didn't mind me reverting a couple of times - it doesn't seem sensible to have an article at United Kingdom general election, 2017 and another one at Next United Kingdom general election, but maybe you disagree. The article hasn't been moved yet because there's still uncertainty with the vote in parliament coming up, but one the date is confirmed I'd imagine Next United Kingdom general election being quickly moved to the United Kingdom general election, 2017 title. Thanks — Amakuru ( talk) 10:55, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Heyy,
I want to make TravelTriangle page
pls tell me if that is possible
Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ambalika.gandhi9 ( talk • contribs) 13:52, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Please check my source. Xx236 ( talk) 08:17, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
I think you might have meant to block this account indefinitely, it's vandalism-only and now it already has a sockpuppet. If not, never mind. Home Lander ( talk) 22:23, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
(for the peanut gallery, or in the case of Fylbecatulous, the cat herd - the quotation here is parodying Mrs May's speech for the Tory Leadership last summer, to which end I have decided it's time for another userbox.... Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:42, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
This is how this user deals with conflict. --- The Old Jacobite The '45 22:19, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hyde Park, London, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horse Guard. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:56, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Not sure if this applies to blocks, but don't forget that Mlpearc has a legitimate alternate account: Mlpearc Phone. — Gestrid ( talk) 13:55, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Yucca&type=revision&diff=777022028&oldid=777021562
Is this some sort of suicide/violence threat? What do you reckon? I'm not sure... Adam9007 ( talk) 19:42, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie, I work for Woodward Gallery in NYC. We are the gallery that represents the artist Richard Hambleton. Thanks for your help with Richard Hambleton's birhtdate. I have another question regarding the website on his wiki page. We noticed that his website was changed back to richardhambleton.com. However that is not his official website. His official website is actually richardhambleton.art which has all of his biographical information, artist resume, exhibition history, a large selection of his works and news articles of past and present. Richardhambleton.art was the official website on his wikipage for years and has been Richard Hambleton's official website for 10 years. The other website is promotional material to a documentary film going on at the Tribeca Film Festival and was create for personal gain by a producer of the film. How do I get his official site changed back to richardhambleton.art? Thanks for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kwhipple90 ( talk • contribs) 15:17, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
I checked the page and it still says richardhambleton.com instead of richardhambleton.art
@ Ritchie333:Thank you both so much for your help last week and for changing the link to RichardHambleton.art. However someone keeps changing the website back to richardhambleton.com. Is there anyway I can stop this from happening? Thanks! Kevin
I've pinged the reverting editor, and requested they follow up your question on the talk page. That should hopefully sort things out. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:23, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Obscured by Clouds you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
FunkMonk --
FunkMonk (
talk)
09:20, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
"Does the very nature of the structure of Wikipedia drive out creative editors – content writers and those who significantly improve aricles – in favor of non-creative "rules"-following editors unable or unwilling to make complex evaluations of specific situations in favor of simply applying generalized solutions whether they are improvements or not?" [1] |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
I was not edit warring - I was reverting unexplained deletions of content. Denisarona ( talk) 11:19, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
"I don't understand why you're upset, sorry." I don't know what's wrong with yuor judgment lately, but this again shows that you need to rethink your approach to adminning. When one person (in this case, an IP without former edit history) is vandalizing a page (removing whole sections indiscriminately) and multiple well-established editors are reverting them, the solution is not to protect the page but to warn (already done by others) or block the IP involved, and give the vandal reverters a barnstar or a "thanks". Looking at the IP edits, you can see that they removed all sources from the 1965 section, removed the 1977 section completely twice thrice, and removed the 1999 section completely twice. Their final edits to the article again removed most of a section and added their only actual contribution, an unsourced POV line. This is vandalism. Please undo your protection, block the IP (or keep a close eye on it) and somehow indicate to Denisarona that you misread the situation. Perhaps that way we can prevent that a good, helpful editor is being driven off by a thoughtless admin action and reaction. Fram ( talk) 11:00, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
|
The article
Obscured by Clouds you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Obscured by Clouds for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
FunkMonk --
FunkMonk (
talk)
13:02, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
As it's obvious, I do not agree with your block of Mlpearc. First, they had two reverts of the Pink Floyd material, the last one ten hours before your block. Second, the IP they reported to AIV had already been blocked a few days ago for disruptive editing for the exact same behavior. There is no reason for Mlpearc to suffer for wildly inconsistent admin behavior. You also are editing in the Pink Floyd area (and indeed, have edited the same article you blocked Mlpearc for edit warring on), took them to ANI where there was little support for your position, and placed another very dubious block on another editor editing in the same area about five weeks ago. Can you please lift Mlpearc's block with an appropriate note? -- NeilN talk to me 19:03, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
FYI: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Block_review_of_Mlpearc -- NeilN talk to me 20:29, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
I'm not debating the merits of whether this is actually notable or appropriate for an A7 but in your decline of
Indy Hall you said "decline A7, has source, consider a redirect to Old City, Philadelphia
" but I'm a little confused as to how their own (currently non-working) website can be considered enough to satisfy CCS?
CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
16:43, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Hey, if you've got some time, would you be able to copyedit or look over Fighters Uncaged? It's not a topic that you normally edit, so I understand if you decline. Cheers, Anarchyte ( work | talk) 08:34, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
You accidentally removed the wikilink for the tram, leaving the hook linkless. DuncanHill ( talk) 15:06, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
TRM is great on MOS issues. Otherwise, or for helpfully pedantic and (I'll give it to him) usually correct third-party checking and general proofing, Tony1 is excellent. And helpful. -- Dweller ( talk) Become old fashioned! 15:54, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Hey @ Ritchie333:, first of all , I would like to say huge thank you for your support to my Wiki journey. You gave me many, extremely helpful tips ( talk ) and pointed me to the right direction on many occasions and supported me on my immature mistakes (e.g. my mistake creating Scott Galloway (professor) ) :) . However, I have a question on your CSD contest for Jordan French , as I've stated in my initial nomination, most of the references on this page are written by the same author Jordan French. In other words he is a contributor to these publications (HuffPost,Inc etc. ), so I believe there is a big issue. Going further, I could make a strong assumption that previous articles about his company on the same publications "has been strongly influenced/affiliated by/with this person" . In any case, I would highly appreciate your opinion and feedback, especially, I'm curious why did you make a decision to merge/redirect rather than delete? Thanks Jone Rohne Nester ( talk) 20:24, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dartford Crossing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ockenden. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:14, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi my fellow Wikipedian. Regarding your revert here, please note lie 50 second block where a point was after a sfn template and I removed it. This is an edit that improved Wikipedia and made it better for readers and people who enjoy printed version. Happy editing! -- Magioladitis ( talk) 10:16, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
{{
sfn}}
was both valid and good. Moving the {{
about}}
to the very top was also good, in accordance with
WP:HNP; this concerns accessibility. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
10:40, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
{{
about}}
and {{
good article}}
tags makes any difference whatsoever - surely it shouldn't?
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
10:43, 2 May 2017 (UTC)Your question is above the line for optional questions, not below the line. Just thought I'd point that out for you to correct as I'm not comfortable with contributing to RfA discussions (and their pages) just yet. Thanks! -=Troop=- ( talk) 16:22, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
For courageously stepping into the breach in defense of the project. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 15:32, 3 May 2017 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:58, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 50 | ← | Archive 55 | Archive 56 | Archive 57 | Archive 58 | Archive 59 | Archive 60 |
The outcomes of recent RfAs make it an opportune time to bring this up. I have considered bidding for adminship for the past week. I feel, with the new ways I am reaching out to contribute (article creations on different subjects, pending changes reviewer, Afds, DYKs, etc.) that I am gaining the knowledge required to be an admin. I intend to tackle more acts of vandalism in the coming months before I would consider taking another step foward with this idea. With all that being said, I wanted your opinion on the matter because I have always trusted you above all other experienced admins. Your complete and total honesty on my chances in the near future is appreciated. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 19:16, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
( talk page stalker) TGS, the fact that you created at least two sockpuppets to (1) impersonate a user and (2) harass another user is going to completely nuke any chances you have for adminship. The fact that you have still been apparently harassing said user is further damage. I don't see any reason that you need the tools or any evidence that you work in administrative areas. As others have said here, stick to content creation, which is what you apparently do best and what you apparently love. Softlavender ( talk) 05:05, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hyde Park, London, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kilburn and Powder magazine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:54, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
I noticed that "obvious vandalism" in User:Ritchie333/Plain and simple guide to A7 links to A3 and not G3. Thought I'd let you know as I'm not sure if I should boldly fix it. Adam9007 ( talk) 02:56, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
What is a "dog's breakfast" in this context lik you said? ★Trekker ( talk) 18:49, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Some Easter
Gwyn Hughes Jones
for you
![]() ![]() | |
"Pasg Hapus! ... Happy Easter to you" ... y geiriau. Martinevans123 ( talk) 17:50, 16 April 2017 (UTC) |
Diolch yn fawr, Martin. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:05, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Why did you delete the page it is rather important and hold mass significance in the Hearthstone community. It is even cited in a couple articles here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Odenk2 ( talk • contribs) 22:54, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
Hopefully, others and myself can make enough edits to make it a full blown article. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Odenk2 ( talk • contribs) 20:44, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie333
Hope you didn't mind me reverting a couple of times - it doesn't seem sensible to have an article at United Kingdom general election, 2017 and another one at Next United Kingdom general election, but maybe you disagree. The article hasn't been moved yet because there's still uncertainty with the vote in parliament coming up, but one the date is confirmed I'd imagine Next United Kingdom general election being quickly moved to the United Kingdom general election, 2017 title. Thanks — Amakuru ( talk) 10:55, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Heyy,
I want to make TravelTriangle page
pls tell me if that is possible
Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ambalika.gandhi9 ( talk • contribs) 13:52, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Please check my source. Xx236 ( talk) 08:17, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
I think you might have meant to block this account indefinitely, it's vandalism-only and now it already has a sockpuppet. If not, never mind. Home Lander ( talk) 22:23, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
(for the peanut gallery, or in the case of Fylbecatulous, the cat herd - the quotation here is parodying Mrs May's speech for the Tory Leadership last summer, to which end I have decided it's time for another userbox.... Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:42, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
This is how this user deals with conflict. --- The Old Jacobite The '45 22:19, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hyde Park, London, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horse Guard. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:56, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Not sure if this applies to blocks, but don't forget that Mlpearc has a legitimate alternate account: Mlpearc Phone. — Gestrid ( talk) 13:55, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Yucca&type=revision&diff=777022028&oldid=777021562
Is this some sort of suicide/violence threat? What do you reckon? I'm not sure... Adam9007 ( talk) 19:42, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie, I work for Woodward Gallery in NYC. We are the gallery that represents the artist Richard Hambleton. Thanks for your help with Richard Hambleton's birhtdate. I have another question regarding the website on his wiki page. We noticed that his website was changed back to richardhambleton.com. However that is not his official website. His official website is actually richardhambleton.art which has all of his biographical information, artist resume, exhibition history, a large selection of his works and news articles of past and present. Richardhambleton.art was the official website on his wikipage for years and has been Richard Hambleton's official website for 10 years. The other website is promotional material to a documentary film going on at the Tribeca Film Festival and was create for personal gain by a producer of the film. How do I get his official site changed back to richardhambleton.art? Thanks for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kwhipple90 ( talk • contribs) 15:17, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
I checked the page and it still says richardhambleton.com instead of richardhambleton.art
@ Ritchie333:Thank you both so much for your help last week and for changing the link to RichardHambleton.art. However someone keeps changing the website back to richardhambleton.com. Is there anyway I can stop this from happening? Thanks! Kevin
I've pinged the reverting editor, and requested they follow up your question on the talk page. That should hopefully sort things out. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:23, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Obscured by Clouds you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
FunkMonk --
FunkMonk (
talk)
09:20, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
"Does the very nature of the structure of Wikipedia drive out creative editors – content writers and those who significantly improve aricles – in favor of non-creative "rules"-following editors unable or unwilling to make complex evaluations of specific situations in favor of simply applying generalized solutions whether they are improvements or not?" [1] |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
I was not edit warring - I was reverting unexplained deletions of content. Denisarona ( talk) 11:19, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
"I don't understand why you're upset, sorry." I don't know what's wrong with yuor judgment lately, but this again shows that you need to rethink your approach to adminning. When one person (in this case, an IP without former edit history) is vandalizing a page (removing whole sections indiscriminately) and multiple well-established editors are reverting them, the solution is not to protect the page but to warn (already done by others) or block the IP involved, and give the vandal reverters a barnstar or a "thanks". Looking at the IP edits, you can see that they removed all sources from the 1965 section, removed the 1977 section completely twice thrice, and removed the 1999 section completely twice. Their final edits to the article again removed most of a section and added their only actual contribution, an unsourced POV line. This is vandalism. Please undo your protection, block the IP (or keep a close eye on it) and somehow indicate to Denisarona that you misread the situation. Perhaps that way we can prevent that a good, helpful editor is being driven off by a thoughtless admin action and reaction. Fram ( talk) 11:00, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
|
The article
Obscured by Clouds you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Obscured by Clouds for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
FunkMonk --
FunkMonk (
talk)
13:02, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
As it's obvious, I do not agree with your block of Mlpearc. First, they had two reverts of the Pink Floyd material, the last one ten hours before your block. Second, the IP they reported to AIV had already been blocked a few days ago for disruptive editing for the exact same behavior. There is no reason for Mlpearc to suffer for wildly inconsistent admin behavior. You also are editing in the Pink Floyd area (and indeed, have edited the same article you blocked Mlpearc for edit warring on), took them to ANI where there was little support for your position, and placed another very dubious block on another editor editing in the same area about five weeks ago. Can you please lift Mlpearc's block with an appropriate note? -- NeilN talk to me 19:03, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
FYI: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Block_review_of_Mlpearc -- NeilN talk to me 20:29, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
I'm not debating the merits of whether this is actually notable or appropriate for an A7 but in your decline of
Indy Hall you said "decline A7, has source, consider a redirect to Old City, Philadelphia
" but I'm a little confused as to how their own (currently non-working) website can be considered enough to satisfy CCS?
CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
16:43, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Hey, if you've got some time, would you be able to copyedit or look over Fighters Uncaged? It's not a topic that you normally edit, so I understand if you decline. Cheers, Anarchyte ( work | talk) 08:34, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
You accidentally removed the wikilink for the tram, leaving the hook linkless. DuncanHill ( talk) 15:06, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
TRM is great on MOS issues. Otherwise, or for helpfully pedantic and (I'll give it to him) usually correct third-party checking and general proofing, Tony1 is excellent. And helpful. -- Dweller ( talk) Become old fashioned! 15:54, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Hey @ Ritchie333:, first of all , I would like to say huge thank you for your support to my Wiki journey. You gave me many, extremely helpful tips ( talk ) and pointed me to the right direction on many occasions and supported me on my immature mistakes (e.g. my mistake creating Scott Galloway (professor) ) :) . However, I have a question on your CSD contest for Jordan French , as I've stated in my initial nomination, most of the references on this page are written by the same author Jordan French. In other words he is a contributor to these publications (HuffPost,Inc etc. ), so I believe there is a big issue. Going further, I could make a strong assumption that previous articles about his company on the same publications "has been strongly influenced/affiliated by/with this person" . In any case, I would highly appreciate your opinion and feedback, especially, I'm curious why did you make a decision to merge/redirect rather than delete? Thanks Jone Rohne Nester ( talk) 20:24, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dartford Crossing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ockenden. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:14, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi my fellow Wikipedian. Regarding your revert here, please note lie 50 second block where a point was after a sfn template and I removed it. This is an edit that improved Wikipedia and made it better for readers and people who enjoy printed version. Happy editing! -- Magioladitis ( talk) 10:16, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
{{
sfn}}
was both valid and good. Moving the {{
about}}
to the very top was also good, in accordance with
WP:HNP; this concerns accessibility. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
10:40, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
{{
about}}
and {{
good article}}
tags makes any difference whatsoever - surely it shouldn't?
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
10:43, 2 May 2017 (UTC)Your question is above the line for optional questions, not below the line. Just thought I'd point that out for you to correct as I'm not comfortable with contributing to RfA discussions (and their pages) just yet. Thanks! -=Troop=- ( talk) 16:22, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
For courageously stepping into the breach in defense of the project. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 15:32, 3 May 2017 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:58, 6 May 2017 (UTC)