Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
Hi ReynTime! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Osarius ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 16:19, 24 November 2014 (UTC) |
This comment of yours should probably not be put in the section that has only been edited by administrators. Please remove it and place it in a separate section that looks like the "Statement by [screenname]" sections above the "Result concerning Ryulong" section.— Ryūlóng ( 琉竜) 04:31, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Oh, someone else did it for you.— Ryūlóng ( 琉竜) 04:32, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Just a tip - when an arbitrator removes something from a page, don't put it back. There's a reason they did that. NorthBySouthBaranof ( talk) 12:53, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Threaded discussion is not allowed at this page. Please move all your comments into your own section, or I will do it for you. There is a 500 word limit. RGloucester — ☎ 13:30, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
I'd suggest you refactor your gamergate comments that allege what Avono posted is "illegal" or that a third party "will be sued." Those can be construed as legal threats and we have a zero tolerance policy. See WP:NLT. I don't believe you have standing or authority to make good on those threats (whence another reason they should be refactored into non-legal language). Legal threats is a chilling argument style to use in collaborative environments. -- DHeyward ( talk) 18:05, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. It is apparent to me that you are a single-purpose account. You are also clearly not a new editor. Your first ever edits were to dive into the thread on Jimbo Wales' talk page and ANI like a seasoned pro and your editing has gone downhill from there. Your repeated use of talk pages as a forum and inability to refrain from your own commentary are unacceptable, and your snide remarks have contributed to the toxicity of the atmosphere in the topic area. As such, it is my conclusion that you have no interest in writing a neutral encyclopaedia, so I have blocked you indefinitely. Regards, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:15, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
Hi ReynTime! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Osarius ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 16:19, 24 November 2014 (UTC) |
This comment of yours should probably not be put in the section that has only been edited by administrators. Please remove it and place it in a separate section that looks like the "Statement by [screenname]" sections above the "Result concerning Ryulong" section.— Ryūlóng ( 琉竜) 04:31, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Oh, someone else did it for you.— Ryūlóng ( 琉竜) 04:32, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Just a tip - when an arbitrator removes something from a page, don't put it back. There's a reason they did that. NorthBySouthBaranof ( talk) 12:53, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Threaded discussion is not allowed at this page. Please move all your comments into your own section, or I will do it for you. There is a 500 word limit. RGloucester — ☎ 13:30, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
I'd suggest you refactor your gamergate comments that allege what Avono posted is "illegal" or that a third party "will be sued." Those can be construed as legal threats and we have a zero tolerance policy. See WP:NLT. I don't believe you have standing or authority to make good on those threats (whence another reason they should be refactored into non-legal language). Legal threats is a chilling argument style to use in collaborative environments. -- DHeyward ( talk) 18:05, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. It is apparent to me that you are a single-purpose account. You are also clearly not a new editor. Your first ever edits were to dive into the thread on Jimbo Wales' talk page and ANI like a seasoned pro and your editing has gone downhill from there. Your repeated use of talk pages as a forum and inability to refrain from your own commentary are unacceptable, and your snide remarks have contributed to the toxicity of the atmosphere in the topic area. As such, it is my conclusion that you have no interest in writing a neutral encyclopaedia, so I have blocked you indefinitely. Regards, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:15, 5 December 2014 (UTC)