![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The fish people miss the famously kind and helpful RexxS and want him back so they can keep bothering him! :-(
darwin
fish
darwinbish
BITE
☠
15:04, 8 October 2013 (UTC).
You were like a real fellow. (If you are still participating, Fluorine could use some peer review help.) But priority on the person, not the Wiki crap.-TCO
Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013
by The Interior ( talk · contribs), Ocaasi ( talk · contribs)
Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...
New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian
Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.
New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??
New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges
News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY
Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions
New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration
Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. -- The Interior 20:51, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Did you know ...
and that your article appeared on DYK, pictured? Will go for GA quality next. Thank you for your help with the French, encouraging! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 18:58, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
And will be back to Wikipedia soon. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 01:30, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. I wanted to let you know that I've requested a deletion review of the outcome from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vedontakal Vrop. The review request has been posted at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2013 December 2. Regards. -- Whpq ( talk) 11:31, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 15:19, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for all of the fixin', like this. Because there has been such persistent opposition and battleground throughout that suite, I was over-attributing and sticking verrrrrry close to exactly what the sources said, since "they" were throwing around accusations of POV. My hope was that by using direct quotes and attributing them, the battleground would lessen, but noooo. Your brevity is much better, and you will find same needed everywhere. I was pushing uphill to get any of that done by myself (and now really need to take a few days to catch up on everything else I let drop ... ). Thanks so much for the improvements! SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 21:28, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
It spreads to
Schizophrenia, that has mentioned the cannabis connection since I can remember.
[1]
SandyGeorgia (
Talk)
02:16, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Nice to see you are back in action. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 09:52, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Your account has been granted the template editor
user right, allowing you to edit
templates and
modules that have been protected with
template protection. It also allows you to bypass the
title blacklist, giving you the ability to create and edit
edit notices.
You can use this user right to perform maintenance, answer edit requests, and make any other simple and generally uncontroversial edits to templates, modules, and edit notices. You can also use it to enact more complex or controversial edits, after those edits are first made to a test sandbox, and their technical reliability as well as their consensus among other informed editors has been established.
Before you use this user right, please read Wikipedia:Template editor and make sure you understand its contents. In particular, you should read the section on wise template editing and the criteria for revocation. This user right gives you access to some of Wikipedia's most important templates and modules; it is critical that you edit them wisely and that you only make edits that are backed up by consensus. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password.
If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
Useful links:
Happy template editing! — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 01:02, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Ϣere
SpielChequers is wishing you
Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's
Solstice or
Christmas,
Diwali,
Hogmanay,
Hanukkah,
Lenaia,
Festivus or even the
Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:WereSpielChequers/Dec13}} to your friends' talk pages.
![]() |
Best wishes |
for the holidays and 2014 from a warmer place than where you probably are ;) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 11:20, 21 December 2013 (UTC) |
![]() |
A very happy Christmas and New Year to you! |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
Merry Christmas and best wishes for a happy, healthy and productive 2014! |
Ruhrfisch ><>°° 15:47, 25 December 2013 (UTC) |
Long time no see, Rexx. Merry Christmas! the wub "?!" 17:47, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, yes, '8th St.' is doubtless correct given that it is the Cooper Union auditorium. I just knew "Sth' was nonsense. - Jmabel | Talk 20:07, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Your request for clarification has been archived at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Infoboxes#Request for clarification (December 2013).
For the Arbitration Committee,
-- Bbb23 ( talk) 17:58, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Do you know what this refers to? SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 03:38, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
{{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)."We conclude that healthcare providers should be cognizant that the existing literature suggests that marijuana use can cause physical harm. However, evidence is needed, and further research should be considered, to prove causal associations of marijuana with many physical health conditions."and just wants to pretend that the second part says 'cannabis doesn't cause any physical health problems'. It's late here now, but I'll take a look at it tomorrow. -- RexxS ( talk) 05:16, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Not interested in the irrelevent back-and-forth on the RFA, but when you wrote "clean start return as PumpkinSky without hiding his previous account," were you aware of [2], where he hides his previous account? Hipocrite ( talk) 17:40, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Yes, indeed, the north facade of Palazzo Pitti is extremely pink, especially in the setting sun [6], but not as pink as the former home of one of my dearest, most misunderstood and late friends Eva Peron. Oh how I used to enjoy my sojourns at the Casa Rosada advising poor Eva on etiquette and appearance. She once said to me "Lady Catherine, you would have made so much a better First Lady of Argentine than I." Poor darling Eva, I often feel her insightful perception and brain was never fully understood. The Lady Catherine de Burgh ( talk) 18:35, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
You understand that stupid place. some daft little admin there has just blocked me for trying to point out that I uploaded a photograph erroneously years ago to which I did not have the copyright. I thought it was one I took, but have now discovered that I didn't - an easy mistake ina house full of such photographsall of the same subject. The details are here [7] IIcan't be bothered to argue with Commons; it's not as though I ever uploaded it to them anyway. Thanks ex. Giano 22:32, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Hey RexxS, while I'm not involved in the governance of FLC any more, thanks again for your time and generous advice. Hope you're well. The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:28, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. It's a pity what happened and that we're now on bad terms. I trust the judgement of Cassinanto and Montanabw that you're a reasonable fellow. Just promise me something. If you ever disagree with anything I say again, can you at least warn me that you're considering taking it to arb. If you'd told me you had intended doing so over this I'd have slightly altered what I'd written to avoid it escalating. At the end of the day life is too short for this sort of disagreement and ill-feeling. I wish you all the best. Happy editing.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:07, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi RexxS! Thank you for the warm welcome and comments. Point taken! How odd my contributions would be so close to the text you mentioned since I have not read it. I guess I should be a travel guide writer! :) I do want to point out that the phrase you mentioned above was not my contribution and can still be found in the reverted article. I'm assuming my detailing of the rooms is what was so close to the text you mentioned?
You're right, I was too bold in my revisions and need to start off small. Thank you for taking the time to explain the process and keep me on the straight and narrow. I guess I do need to be adopted! -- Landry76 ( talk) 20:42, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
<meta name="robots" content="noindex,follow" />
, which will tell all the major search indexing spiders not to index these pages. Cheers --
RexxS (
talk)
18:39, 20 February 2014 (UTC)The Clarification Request you initiated on 8 February 2014 has been archived. You can view it here. For the Arbitration Committee, Rockfang ( talk) 14:57, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Well said on Giano's talk. You were measured and correct. I sometimes wonder why people who share so much in common fight over such small matters, though in this instance there was clearly some pot stirring. Anyway, take this as a friendly kudos. Ceoil ( talk) 11:19, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Like
Montanabw
(talk)
20:00, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
As one of the previous contributors to {{ Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!
I did thank people for chiming in on the issue at the Dyslexia article, but I want to personally thank you. So, umm, thank you. Dbrodbeck ( talk) 21:44, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Just a reminder that the West Midlands Police Museum editathon is this Saturday; I look forward to seeing you there. Please take a moment to re-read the event page, so you know what to bring with you, and what to expect on the day. Do let me know if you have any questions, or can't attend. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:54, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your helpful comments at peer review Wikipedia:Peer review/List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit!/archive1.
I must admit I was a little confused, as I modeled this page after List of awards and nominations received by The Vampire Diaries which was promoted to WP:FL quality in January 2013.
Can you help please with the WP:DTT coding suggestions you made for List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit! ?
It sounds like you are better at that sort of coding thing than me.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt ( talk) 03:37, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sara Dylan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Dylan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.. Alatari ( talk) 13:11, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Notifying you, as you participated in the Peer Review and asked to be notified:
I've started a Featured List nomination for List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit!.
Participation would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit!/archive1.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt ( talk) 15:31, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your time and contributions in Birmingham today. As always, it was good to see you; albeit we didn't get long enough to chat. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:38, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi, a question re Wikipedia:Requests for comment/QuackGuru2: You endorsed jps' outside view, which said, among other things, that Wikipedia "would be better off if the two editors endorsing the RfC were banned from these topics" (said topics, I assume, being the areas where QG's conduct is indicted in the RfC; it's unclear). AFAIK, I've had virtually no interaction with you, but assume you must have reviewed my edits (and block log etc.), and those of Mallexikon (the other RfC endorser), or you wouldn't have endorsed such a strong statement. Apart from whatever objections you have to the RfC itself, can you explain why you believe Mallexikon and myself deserve to be topic-banned, and from which topics particularly? What have we done that's that bad? Maybe you can show me a couple diffs that are representative of whatever ongoing problems there are. I'd appreciate the feedback; I'm pretty sure Mallexikon would too! Thanks. -- Middle 8 ( leave me alone • talk to me • COI) 09:22, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Fat fingered on my keyboard, my error I reverted my own edit. Sorry about that. Coal town guy ( talk) 02:26, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Mucho Macho Man is now at FAC, thanks for your help with the chart! Want to be a co-nom on the article? Montanabw (talk) 20:53, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
— Preceding undated comment added 20:12, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The fish people miss the famously kind and helpful RexxS and want him back so they can keep bothering him! :-(
darwin
fish
darwinbish
BITE
☠
15:04, 8 October 2013 (UTC).
You were like a real fellow. (If you are still participating, Fluorine could use some peer review help.) But priority on the person, not the Wiki crap.-TCO
Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013
by The Interior ( talk · contribs), Ocaasi ( talk · contribs)
Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...
New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian
Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.
New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??
New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges
News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY
Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions
New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration
Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. -- The Interior 20:51, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Did you know ...
and that your article appeared on DYK, pictured? Will go for GA quality next. Thank you for your help with the French, encouraging! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 18:58, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
And will be back to Wikipedia soon. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 01:30, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. I wanted to let you know that I've requested a deletion review of the outcome from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vedontakal Vrop. The review request has been posted at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2013 December 2. Regards. -- Whpq ( talk) 11:31, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 15:19, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for all of the fixin', like this. Because there has been such persistent opposition and battleground throughout that suite, I was over-attributing and sticking verrrrrry close to exactly what the sources said, since "they" were throwing around accusations of POV. My hope was that by using direct quotes and attributing them, the battleground would lessen, but noooo. Your brevity is much better, and you will find same needed everywhere. I was pushing uphill to get any of that done by myself (and now really need to take a few days to catch up on everything else I let drop ... ). Thanks so much for the improvements! SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 21:28, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
It spreads to
Schizophrenia, that has mentioned the cannabis connection since I can remember.
[1]
SandyGeorgia (
Talk)
02:16, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Nice to see you are back in action. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 09:52, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Your account has been granted the template editor
user right, allowing you to edit
templates and
modules that have been protected with
template protection. It also allows you to bypass the
title blacklist, giving you the ability to create and edit
edit notices.
You can use this user right to perform maintenance, answer edit requests, and make any other simple and generally uncontroversial edits to templates, modules, and edit notices. You can also use it to enact more complex or controversial edits, after those edits are first made to a test sandbox, and their technical reliability as well as their consensus among other informed editors has been established.
Before you use this user right, please read Wikipedia:Template editor and make sure you understand its contents. In particular, you should read the section on wise template editing and the criteria for revocation. This user right gives you access to some of Wikipedia's most important templates and modules; it is critical that you edit them wisely and that you only make edits that are backed up by consensus. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password.
If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
Useful links:
Happy template editing! — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 01:02, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Ϣere
SpielChequers is wishing you
Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's
Solstice or
Christmas,
Diwali,
Hogmanay,
Hanukkah,
Lenaia,
Festivus or even the
Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:WereSpielChequers/Dec13}} to your friends' talk pages.
![]() |
Best wishes |
for the holidays and 2014 from a warmer place than where you probably are ;) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 11:20, 21 December 2013 (UTC) |
![]() |
A very happy Christmas and New Year to you! |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
Merry Christmas and best wishes for a happy, healthy and productive 2014! |
Ruhrfisch ><>°° 15:47, 25 December 2013 (UTC) |
Long time no see, Rexx. Merry Christmas! the wub "?!" 17:47, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, yes, '8th St.' is doubtless correct given that it is the Cooper Union auditorium. I just knew "Sth' was nonsense. - Jmabel | Talk 20:07, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Your request for clarification has been archived at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Infoboxes#Request for clarification (December 2013).
For the Arbitration Committee,
-- Bbb23 ( talk) 17:58, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Do you know what this refers to? SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 03:38, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
{{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)."We conclude that healthcare providers should be cognizant that the existing literature suggests that marijuana use can cause physical harm. However, evidence is needed, and further research should be considered, to prove causal associations of marijuana with many physical health conditions."and just wants to pretend that the second part says 'cannabis doesn't cause any physical health problems'. It's late here now, but I'll take a look at it tomorrow. -- RexxS ( talk) 05:16, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Not interested in the irrelevent back-and-forth on the RFA, but when you wrote "clean start return as PumpkinSky without hiding his previous account," were you aware of [2], where he hides his previous account? Hipocrite ( talk) 17:40, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Yes, indeed, the north facade of Palazzo Pitti is extremely pink, especially in the setting sun [6], but not as pink as the former home of one of my dearest, most misunderstood and late friends Eva Peron. Oh how I used to enjoy my sojourns at the Casa Rosada advising poor Eva on etiquette and appearance. She once said to me "Lady Catherine, you would have made so much a better First Lady of Argentine than I." Poor darling Eva, I often feel her insightful perception and brain was never fully understood. The Lady Catherine de Burgh ( talk) 18:35, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
You understand that stupid place. some daft little admin there has just blocked me for trying to point out that I uploaded a photograph erroneously years ago to which I did not have the copyright. I thought it was one I took, but have now discovered that I didn't - an easy mistake ina house full of such photographsall of the same subject. The details are here [7] IIcan't be bothered to argue with Commons; it's not as though I ever uploaded it to them anyway. Thanks ex. Giano 22:32, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Hey RexxS, while I'm not involved in the governance of FLC any more, thanks again for your time and generous advice. Hope you're well. The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:28, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. It's a pity what happened and that we're now on bad terms. I trust the judgement of Cassinanto and Montanabw that you're a reasonable fellow. Just promise me something. If you ever disagree with anything I say again, can you at least warn me that you're considering taking it to arb. If you'd told me you had intended doing so over this I'd have slightly altered what I'd written to avoid it escalating. At the end of the day life is too short for this sort of disagreement and ill-feeling. I wish you all the best. Happy editing.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:07, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi RexxS! Thank you for the warm welcome and comments. Point taken! How odd my contributions would be so close to the text you mentioned since I have not read it. I guess I should be a travel guide writer! :) I do want to point out that the phrase you mentioned above was not my contribution and can still be found in the reverted article. I'm assuming my detailing of the rooms is what was so close to the text you mentioned?
You're right, I was too bold in my revisions and need to start off small. Thank you for taking the time to explain the process and keep me on the straight and narrow. I guess I do need to be adopted! -- Landry76 ( talk) 20:42, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
<meta name="robots" content="noindex,follow" />
, which will tell all the major search indexing spiders not to index these pages. Cheers --
RexxS (
talk)
18:39, 20 February 2014 (UTC)The Clarification Request you initiated on 8 February 2014 has been archived. You can view it here. For the Arbitration Committee, Rockfang ( talk) 14:57, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Well said on Giano's talk. You were measured and correct. I sometimes wonder why people who share so much in common fight over such small matters, though in this instance there was clearly some pot stirring. Anyway, take this as a friendly kudos. Ceoil ( talk) 11:19, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Like
Montanabw
(talk)
20:00, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
As one of the previous contributors to {{ Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!
I did thank people for chiming in on the issue at the Dyslexia article, but I want to personally thank you. So, umm, thank you. Dbrodbeck ( talk) 21:44, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Just a reminder that the West Midlands Police Museum editathon is this Saturday; I look forward to seeing you there. Please take a moment to re-read the event page, so you know what to bring with you, and what to expect on the day. Do let me know if you have any questions, or can't attend. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:54, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your helpful comments at peer review Wikipedia:Peer review/List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit!/archive1.
I must admit I was a little confused, as I modeled this page after List of awards and nominations received by The Vampire Diaries which was promoted to WP:FL quality in January 2013.
Can you help please with the WP:DTT coding suggestions you made for List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit! ?
It sounds like you are better at that sort of coding thing than me.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt ( talk) 03:37, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sara Dylan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Dylan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.. Alatari ( talk) 13:11, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Notifying you, as you participated in the Peer Review and asked to be notified:
I've started a Featured List nomination for List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit!.
Participation would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit!/archive1.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt ( talk) 15:31, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your time and contributions in Birmingham today. As always, it was good to see you; albeit we didn't get long enough to chat. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:38, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi, a question re Wikipedia:Requests for comment/QuackGuru2: You endorsed jps' outside view, which said, among other things, that Wikipedia "would be better off if the two editors endorsing the RfC were banned from these topics" (said topics, I assume, being the areas where QG's conduct is indicted in the RfC; it's unclear). AFAIK, I've had virtually no interaction with you, but assume you must have reviewed my edits (and block log etc.), and those of Mallexikon (the other RfC endorser), or you wouldn't have endorsed such a strong statement. Apart from whatever objections you have to the RfC itself, can you explain why you believe Mallexikon and myself deserve to be topic-banned, and from which topics particularly? What have we done that's that bad? Maybe you can show me a couple diffs that are representative of whatever ongoing problems there are. I'd appreciate the feedback; I'm pretty sure Mallexikon would too! Thanks. -- Middle 8 ( leave me alone • talk to me • COI) 09:22, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Fat fingered on my keyboard, my error I reverted my own edit. Sorry about that. Coal town guy ( talk) 02:26, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Mucho Macho Man is now at FAC, thanks for your help with the chart! Want to be a co-nom on the article? Montanabw (talk) 20:53, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
— Preceding undated comment added 20:12, 19 March 2014 (UTC)