I see that you have added relevant and interesting facts in several articles about food, also giving sources for your additions. Good work! However, it would be great if you could try to learn when to use and especially when not to use capital letters in English language prose. Keep up the good work. Regards! -- T*U ( talk) 16:01, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Per MOS:Ethnicity, "Ethnicity, religion, or sexuality should generally not be in the lead unless relevant to the subject's notability." Feel free to start a discussion, on relevant talk pages, to gain consensus. -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 16:33, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making abusive or otherwise inappropriate edit summaries or comments, as you did to
Talk:Zoroastrianism. Your edit summary or comment may have been removed. Please communicate with
civility and refrain from making
personal attacks. Thank you.
[1] --
Thinker78
(talk)
17:41, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Only PhD dissertations are considered reliable sources; Masters theses are not. Please do not use Masters theses (yours?) to source Zoroastrianism. If you disagree, take it to the reliable sources noticeboard to get consensus about your specific proposed sources. Please do not continue to edit-war to include them without such a consensus. Skyerise ( talk) 12:02, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Since one thesis was spammed in multiple places, Imma gonna have to assume it was yours. Best not to give the appearance of having a conflict of interest, when other sources exist.
Hello, Researcher1988. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on the page
Zarathustrianism, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Skyerise ( talk) 14:16, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Your edit to
Zoroastrianism has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.
GretLomborg (
talk)
19:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Zoroastrianism. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Skyerise ( talk) 01:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi there. Please take this in the mode of friendly and helpful advise. As a matter of courtesy it is generally preferable to use they / them pronouns for all editors unless they disclose otherwise in which case we should their preferred pronouns. In the case of VFF they state on their userpage that they prefer they / them specifically. It is generally good courtesy to comply in these cases. Simonm223 ( talk) 15:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Simonm223 (
talk)
12:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Please stop using bare URLs as citations. Please learn how to use the {{ cite}} templates to create a full citation with author, date, title, journal, publisher, ISBN, doi, etc. I will revert any further lazy use of bare URLs. Skyerise ( talk) 22:08, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Zoroastrianism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Skyerise ( talk) 10:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Do you read the entire article you are citing before you cite it? Because that is an essential part of the process of understanding what it actually says. Skyerise ( talk) 19:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
Skyerise (
talk)
20:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
I see that you have added relevant and interesting facts in several articles about food, also giving sources for your additions. Good work! However, it would be great if you could try to learn when to use and especially when not to use capital letters in English language prose. Keep up the good work. Regards! -- T*U ( talk) 16:01, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Per MOS:Ethnicity, "Ethnicity, religion, or sexuality should generally not be in the lead unless relevant to the subject's notability." Feel free to start a discussion, on relevant talk pages, to gain consensus. -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 16:33, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making abusive or otherwise inappropriate edit summaries or comments, as you did to
Talk:Zoroastrianism. Your edit summary or comment may have been removed. Please communicate with
civility and refrain from making
personal attacks. Thank you.
[1] --
Thinker78
(talk)
17:41, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Only PhD dissertations are considered reliable sources; Masters theses are not. Please do not use Masters theses (yours?) to source Zoroastrianism. If you disagree, take it to the reliable sources noticeboard to get consensus about your specific proposed sources. Please do not continue to edit-war to include them without such a consensus. Skyerise ( talk) 12:02, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Since one thesis was spammed in multiple places, Imma gonna have to assume it was yours. Best not to give the appearance of having a conflict of interest, when other sources exist.
Hello, Researcher1988. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on the page
Zarathustrianism, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Skyerise ( talk) 14:16, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Your edit to
Zoroastrianism has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.
GretLomborg (
talk)
19:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Zoroastrianism. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Skyerise ( talk) 01:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi there. Please take this in the mode of friendly and helpful advise. As a matter of courtesy it is generally preferable to use they / them pronouns for all editors unless they disclose otherwise in which case we should their preferred pronouns. In the case of VFF they state on their userpage that they prefer they / them specifically. It is generally good courtesy to comply in these cases. Simonm223 ( talk) 15:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Simonm223 (
talk)
12:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Please stop using bare URLs as citations. Please learn how to use the {{ cite}} templates to create a full citation with author, date, title, journal, publisher, ISBN, doi, etc. I will revert any further lazy use of bare URLs. Skyerise ( talk) 22:08, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Zoroastrianism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Skyerise ( talk) 10:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Do you read the entire article you are citing before you cite it? Because that is an essential part of the process of understanding what it actually says. Skyerise ( talk) 19:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
Skyerise (
talk)
20:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC)