Please don't template me! Everybody makes mistakes, and this user finds user warning templates impersonal and disrespectful. If there's something you'd like to say, please take a moment to write a comment below in your own words. |
I can tell when you template me and don't put any thought in your message. If you want to alert me to something, please actually link the edit(s) in question (if applicable), taking time writing the message in your owns words, and be respectful. Thanks! - RandomInfinity17 ( talk - contributions) 22:46, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
I'm Paine Ellsworth, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some
common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at
my talk page or type {{helpme}}
here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can
contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can
use a sandbox. You can
create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}}
on
your userpage.
Please remember to:
~~~~
at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your
signature, a link to your talk page, and a
timestamp.Thanks for the track, i' am no use the WTPC for the use in Android :( and no have Internet in my PC and me use te Paint, no see, all tracks it (Unknown) i'am me year see the colour ok i'an use two account (Cubano 153 and Unar64) OK, sorry for me english i'am help Unar64P ( talk) 01:25, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
My date of image it a weather-app seevice. in the app it a wind-weather app, you need download the aplicatation, thanks for the other(s) track(s) https://www.windy.com/ it the link of the Weather Service, All the Storm Liv it no conffirmed european windstorm, in the Groap of the Fub, (Bettina, Elke, Iris and Liv) liv a reppoet of the storm, thanks of the other tracks. Unar64P ( talk) 01:24, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Draft:2022–23_Caribean_Storm Season/ my page Unar64P ( talk) 20:06, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello RandomInfinity17,
You have reverted my edit about storm Nicole on 2022 Atlantic hurricane season, with the edit summary "Wikipedia doesn't do forecasts (WP:CRYSTALBALL)". Of course we don't do forecasts. We do, however, mention forecasts, if they are relevant. The "Forecast maps" in the article are one example. I don't think we need individual forecasts for every single storm. This one may be a good exception though, since it is relevant for the planned Artemis I launch. The storm is mentioned in that article, and the forecast is cited there. The storm's unusual nature is relevant. Renerpho ( talk) 01:46, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I saw your edit earlier removing the automatic updating of the link to the current European Windstorm list and have partially reverted it. Basically the coding needed to reflect that the season is 6-monthly like the Southern Hemisphere tropical cyclone seasons. Its simple when you know how :) Happy New Year. Jason Rees ( talk) 02:28, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, RandomInfinity17. I have a small question. Do you know how to create those global track images for the Tropical Cyclones in XXXX articles? I think the user ( User:Supportstorm) been kind of busy of late, and that is why they haven't created the image as of yet. Cyclonetracker7586 ( talk) 11:38, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Hey, I saw your infobox on the costliest TCs and wanted to suggest that you combine the SHEM lists into SIO and SPAC, since the Australian list will just generally contain TCs that either moved in or our of the basin eg: Freddy/Gabrielle. I also wanted to point you in the direction of the following TCs for the SPAC which almost certainly will need to be listed. Ofa, Val, Gita, Gabrielle, Yasi, Veena, Larry/Monica. (Ie: Systems that impact multiple countries) Also you might want to reach out to @ Hurricanehink: who has done some work on this previously as he maybe able to point you in the right direction of some more TCs. Jason Rees ( talk) 23:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
On 3 April 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Tornado outbreak of March 31, 2023, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 08:25, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Hurricane Fiona, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. If you wish to have the infobox changed to read "weather event" rather than "tropical cyclone (which indeed it was) I would suggest that you (as well as Iseriously) take it up on the article talk page. Thank you. Aloha27 talk 17:09, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Any specific reason why you removed the links to meteorology terms in Template:Infobox weather event/History? Chlod ( say hi!) 22:27, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
|category=
parameter to override the category. The reason why it didn't have that parameter in the first place was to avoid editors from supplying the category, which would be redundant as it's automatically calculated. I've thought of a solution for that just now; feel free to use the parameter as you wish.
Chlod (
say hi!)
01:58, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Very Strong La Nina simply doesn't exist. La Nina has never gotten strong enough for the creation of a very strong category. You can see this here. Noah Talk 23:04, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Hey, I know you are getting annoyed at me, but I hate to say it. Get used to it. It isn't my job to add sources to everything. The editor who changes the numbers should add a new source. I've taken so much flack for not discussing with editors enough & there is tons of unsourced lists in WP:Weather things. I'm working through tornado articles and I don't have the time to clean up after every editor who seems to think not adding a source after changing a death toll or damage total is ok. I've opened discussions and pinged some of those editors who don't add sources and they still don't. So as much as you don't like it, I'm going to keep creating discussions (as I was just mentioned to at an edit warring noticeboard) and citation needed templating every time these editors forget to add a dang source when they change numbers. If I didn't know better, I would take them to AN for failing to source hundreds of edits even after being mentioned that they have to add citations. Sorry, but I've taken too much flack for not communicating with editors, so if you don't like the discussion spam or citation needed spam, get through to the handful of editors who refuse to add citations because I sure can't. Elijahandskip ( talk) 23:49, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page March 2015 North American winter storm, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 20:56, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
The article List of costliest tropical cyclones has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
List fails #7 of WP:DEL-REASON. Per this RfC community consensus, lists regarding the monetary “rank” (costliest lists) need to have a secondary reliable source stating the list. This article does not contain a reliable secondary source stating the list (what is costlier than what), but rather a collection of NOAA and Aon reports which the article lists in a descending order. This exact situation for tornadoes was classified more along the lines of original research per that community RfC.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 10:00, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Just wanted to let you know this edit was reverting a SOCK of Andrew5. IP wasn't blocked as at the time of their initial SPI, the admin said blocking wasn't going to help and just wanted to PP anything they were interested in. The sock-master is easy to spot, with a clear WP:DUCK confirmation if baseball and weather edits occur. Should I have put an edit summary saying it was a SOCK reversion, yes. But, either way, I would like to ask for you to re-revert the edit, since you are technically supporting a reversion done by a disruptive editor ( sock-master). Cheers! The Weather Event Writer ( Talk Page) 23:35, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for taking my suggestions and expanding on your draft so you could publish a vital article! I thereby award you the Original Barnstar. There are a lot of topics that need to be explored in detail on Wikipedia, but thanks to your work, the October 2022 Southern Ocean cyclone is not one of them! ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 04:31, 14 October 2023 (UTC) |
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, RandomInfinity17. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Floods of 2022".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit 14:38, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Please don't template me! Everybody makes mistakes, and this user finds user warning templates impersonal and disrespectful. If there's something you'd like to say, please take a moment to write a comment below in your own words. |
I can tell when you template me and don't put any thought in your message. If you want to alert me to something, please actually link the edit(s) in question (if applicable), taking time writing the message in your owns words, and be respectful. Thanks! - RandomInfinity17 ( talk - contributions) 22:46, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
I'm Paine Ellsworth, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some
common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at
my talk page or type {{helpme}}
here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can
contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can
use a sandbox. You can
create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}}
on
your userpage.
Please remember to:
~~~~
at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your
signature, a link to your talk page, and a
timestamp.Thanks for the track, i' am no use the WTPC for the use in Android :( and no have Internet in my PC and me use te Paint, no see, all tracks it (Unknown) i'am me year see the colour ok i'an use two account (Cubano 153 and Unar64) OK, sorry for me english i'am help Unar64P ( talk) 01:25, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
My date of image it a weather-app seevice. in the app it a wind-weather app, you need download the aplicatation, thanks for the other(s) track(s) https://www.windy.com/ it the link of the Weather Service, All the Storm Liv it no conffirmed european windstorm, in the Groap of the Fub, (Bettina, Elke, Iris and Liv) liv a reppoet of the storm, thanks of the other tracks. Unar64P ( talk) 01:24, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Draft:2022–23_Caribean_Storm Season/ my page Unar64P ( talk) 20:06, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello RandomInfinity17,
You have reverted my edit about storm Nicole on 2022 Atlantic hurricane season, with the edit summary "Wikipedia doesn't do forecasts (WP:CRYSTALBALL)". Of course we don't do forecasts. We do, however, mention forecasts, if they are relevant. The "Forecast maps" in the article are one example. I don't think we need individual forecasts for every single storm. This one may be a good exception though, since it is relevant for the planned Artemis I launch. The storm is mentioned in that article, and the forecast is cited there. The storm's unusual nature is relevant. Renerpho ( talk) 01:46, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I saw your edit earlier removing the automatic updating of the link to the current European Windstorm list and have partially reverted it. Basically the coding needed to reflect that the season is 6-monthly like the Southern Hemisphere tropical cyclone seasons. Its simple when you know how :) Happy New Year. Jason Rees ( talk) 02:28, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, RandomInfinity17. I have a small question. Do you know how to create those global track images for the Tropical Cyclones in XXXX articles? I think the user ( User:Supportstorm) been kind of busy of late, and that is why they haven't created the image as of yet. Cyclonetracker7586 ( talk) 11:38, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Hey, I saw your infobox on the costliest TCs and wanted to suggest that you combine the SHEM lists into SIO and SPAC, since the Australian list will just generally contain TCs that either moved in or our of the basin eg: Freddy/Gabrielle. I also wanted to point you in the direction of the following TCs for the SPAC which almost certainly will need to be listed. Ofa, Val, Gita, Gabrielle, Yasi, Veena, Larry/Monica. (Ie: Systems that impact multiple countries) Also you might want to reach out to @ Hurricanehink: who has done some work on this previously as he maybe able to point you in the right direction of some more TCs. Jason Rees ( talk) 23:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
On 3 April 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Tornado outbreak of March 31, 2023, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 08:25, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Hurricane Fiona, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. If you wish to have the infobox changed to read "weather event" rather than "tropical cyclone (which indeed it was) I would suggest that you (as well as Iseriously) take it up on the article talk page. Thank you. Aloha27 talk 17:09, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Any specific reason why you removed the links to meteorology terms in Template:Infobox weather event/History? Chlod ( say hi!) 22:27, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
|category=
parameter to override the category. The reason why it didn't have that parameter in the first place was to avoid editors from supplying the category, which would be redundant as it's automatically calculated. I've thought of a solution for that just now; feel free to use the parameter as you wish.
Chlod (
say hi!)
01:58, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Very Strong La Nina simply doesn't exist. La Nina has never gotten strong enough for the creation of a very strong category. You can see this here. Noah Talk 23:04, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Hey, I know you are getting annoyed at me, but I hate to say it. Get used to it. It isn't my job to add sources to everything. The editor who changes the numbers should add a new source. I've taken so much flack for not discussing with editors enough & there is tons of unsourced lists in WP:Weather things. I'm working through tornado articles and I don't have the time to clean up after every editor who seems to think not adding a source after changing a death toll or damage total is ok. I've opened discussions and pinged some of those editors who don't add sources and they still don't. So as much as you don't like it, I'm going to keep creating discussions (as I was just mentioned to at an edit warring noticeboard) and citation needed templating every time these editors forget to add a dang source when they change numbers. If I didn't know better, I would take them to AN for failing to source hundreds of edits even after being mentioned that they have to add citations. Sorry, but I've taken too much flack for not communicating with editors, so if you don't like the discussion spam or citation needed spam, get through to the handful of editors who refuse to add citations because I sure can't. Elijahandskip ( talk) 23:49, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page March 2015 North American winter storm, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 20:56, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
The article List of costliest tropical cyclones has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
List fails #7 of WP:DEL-REASON. Per this RfC community consensus, lists regarding the monetary “rank” (costliest lists) need to have a secondary reliable source stating the list. This article does not contain a reliable secondary source stating the list (what is costlier than what), but rather a collection of NOAA and Aon reports which the article lists in a descending order. This exact situation for tornadoes was classified more along the lines of original research per that community RfC.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 10:00, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Just wanted to let you know this edit was reverting a SOCK of Andrew5. IP wasn't blocked as at the time of their initial SPI, the admin said blocking wasn't going to help and just wanted to PP anything they were interested in. The sock-master is easy to spot, with a clear WP:DUCK confirmation if baseball and weather edits occur. Should I have put an edit summary saying it was a SOCK reversion, yes. But, either way, I would like to ask for you to re-revert the edit, since you are technically supporting a reversion done by a disruptive editor ( sock-master). Cheers! The Weather Event Writer ( Talk Page) 23:35, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for taking my suggestions and expanding on your draft so you could publish a vital article! I thereby award you the Original Barnstar. There are a lot of topics that need to be explored in detail on Wikipedia, but thanks to your work, the October 2022 Southern Ocean cyclone is not one of them! ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 04:31, 14 October 2023 (UTC) |
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, RandomInfinity17. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Floods of 2022".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit 14:38, 12 April 2024 (UTC)