|
Hi - User:Lcarsdata has announced on his/her user page (recently) that he/she has permanently left the project but did not unsubscribe to signpost autodeliveries. Do you have any guards against the deliveries just piling up in situations like this? I happened to notice this case (and could remove the user from the delivery list), but it seems like this might be worth a more general solution (like, stopping delivery if a user's last edit is more than [pick a number] weeks/months ago). -- Rick Block ( talk) 02:21, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Hey, screw off, man. I can edit my own damn page. Why the hell do you think you have the right to just do whatever you want? Someone asked me to remove the image, and I was going to. You have no right to just do something to someone's user page without asking or explaining yourself. — Chris53516 ( Talk) 02:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
-- Docg 13:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Hey Ral, just letting you know that my profile on the signpost has only the first edit for User:Improv -- my prior account, User:Pgunn's first edit was in Dec 2002. -- Improv 16:05, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi Ral315. Thank you for the opportunity to be a part of this Signpost series.
What positions do you hold (adminship, mediation, etc.)?
Have you been involved in any arbitration cases? In what capacity?
Why are you running for the Arbitration Committee?
If you have any other questions, you know where to find me. :-) Can't sleep, clown will eat me 13:50, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Respectfully submitted, Kelly Martin ( talk) 19:35, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
I have to get medatation Re: The wikiproject report. - Nathannoblet 01:43, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
This template has 'elections underway' at December 11th, but according to the main page voting starts on December 4th. Is the date wrong, or is this intended to be an article written at the 'half way point', or something else I'm missing? -- Sam Blanning (talk) 13:24, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
I'm afraid there's a misunderstanding there. That page is not referring to WP:POST; it's referring to the internal project's newsletter, similar to how many WikiProjects do... Tito xd( ?!?) 01:19, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the questions! -- Golbez 01:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
I just reached your ArbCom voting page, which said "You're likely here because I've linked this page from my votes/opinions in the ArbCom elections." - in fact, I reached it from your signature on a talk page. I don't think that linking in this way from signatures is helpful. If you want to advertise the elections, it would be better to just link to the election page. Actually, scrub that, I've just investigated a little further, and found this diff where you are cleaning up those sigs, so I guess this was a mistake/bug of some sort. The one I spotted was in a thread at User talk:Geogre. That thread was about people starting discussions on the voting pages. For what it is worth, I think all comments should be stripped from the voting page, but the discussion/talk page should be used for people to raise concerns about the candidates. Pile-on voting is less likely if people see only a list of names in the support/oppose column. If it is not too late, is it not possible to clamp down on discussion on the actual vote pages, and to activate/create the talk pages as discussion venues? I'd like to raise this over at the election talk pages (maybe it is already being discussed there), but wanted to see what at least one other person thought first. Carcharoth 10:46, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
I recently found five possible sockpuppets of ForestH2. See my comments on Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/ForestH2. Squirepants101 23:24, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Not sure what you may be working on, but I can try to throw together a story on the one-millionth Commons file, one of the things that still needs to be covered. Hopefully won't take long to do. -- Michael Snow 03:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
I think Simetrical did have a tech report, it just wasn't listed. -- Michael Snow 05:44, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi, just doin' a litle public service and letting you know since you made the page..the 'vote' and 'questions' links for Will Beback on Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Special/2006-12/All actually link to Alex Bakharev. Dragomiloff 16:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Could you enter into Template:PMID as its decription is wrong. The template does not show the PubMed abstract number as is shown in the example.
Hence mediawiki PMID 12345 gives PMID 12345 but template of {{PMID|12345}} gives PMID 12345
So the templates description needs this code for the described outcome:
Shows: [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=12345 PubMed]
Thank you David Ruben Talk 18:15, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Try reading it in the proper mindset. Andre ( talk) 22:35, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Your input would be appreciated at this Request for Comments. Kelly Martin ( talk) 15:34, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
I noticed that you marked Freakofnuture as withdrawn from the ArbCom elections "following IRC discussions". I'm not quite sure of the best way to put this without causing offence, but is there any way that the candidate themselves can confirm this withdrawal? I notice the last contribution to date from Freakofnuture was on 3 December. Carcharoth 23:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for that. The bot actually overwrites the page every time, so it wouldn't stay, but I spotted it on my watchlist. I've made the change permanent now – Gurch 01:41, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
I have the right to do work for the Signpost.
I WILL implemt [[WP:DR].
I will take these steps.
I am also requesting a editior review to see where I Can help
Thank You
Nathannoblet 06:54, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi Ral315, Punk Boi 8 has brought this request for assistance to the Association of Members' Advocates' attention. Would you be willing to participate? Thanks, riana_dzasta 03:52, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Have you seen your new rival? Written by none other than... noblet :) -- Majo rly 19:35, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for cleaning up those bad-faith AfDs. I wasn't going to get to those for at least a few hours. I appreciate the help! | Mr. Darcy talk 02:32, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Was nosing around and saw this massive vote for the main page redesign (687). Is that the record for any single vote? I wonder what the total number voting in the various ArbCom elections has been, and how many voted in the various Wikimedia Foundation Board Elections (though that is not just en-wiki)? Oh, and I replied to your comment on my talk page. Thanks for that. Carcharoth 03:26, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
You have voted both in support of and in opposition to this candidate. Please remove (at least) one of these. — Cryptic 14:42, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Ral315 wrote:
Sorry about that. The bot was working fine, but the internet was off for several hours. Not sure why, probably some sort of maintenance as it affected the whole area. It's working again now – Gurch 03:28, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi,
I've just started an award, why not come and see what it is? Don't forget to vote!
Carrot Man 07:52, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
I spotted the 100th Signpost anniversary thing, and was wondering if the Signpost will cover the sixth anniversary of Wikipedia in January? Carcharoth 13:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Ral. IMO, polls like that are a bad idea and I don't vote in them. But, since it is going on, it has to be presumed to be the poll on the merits of the ArbCom decision, not on the merits of the case itself. As such, it's to my mind inappropriate for ArbCom members to vote in it - it's like admin candidates voting on their own RFAs, to use the closest analogy we have. I fear your vote may be perceived to be disrupting the poll, which isn't likely to do anybody any good. Zocky | picture popups 13:03, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Look, I am happy to merge only if I can somehow be involved with the signpost. I am not letting my newspaper collapsp just because you started a rouge merge.Anyway, I were never told of these requirements ever. You shold have told me so I could fix up my writing. I am very,very sorry and I think I have just wrecked my chance of getting on ArbCom next year. (sob bob). Sorry again -- Nathannoblet 06:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Just confirming that if you're interested, you can write a Signpost article; I wasn't sure if you'd checked back at the Signpost pages. If you're going to do one this week, please get it in as soon as possible; it'll probably be later than 17:00 UTC this week, but I try to get it published ASAP. Ral315 ( talk) 08:12, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Are you going to include Husnock's emergency [and likely permanent] desysopping in this week's edition? – Ch acor 16:50, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Ral315, my article, User:Ragesoss/Wikipedia and academia, is as done as it's going to get, content-wise. If you're not going to publish it this week, let me know what I need to do to get it into publishable shape.-- ragesoss 05:40, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Sorry bout that - I didn't get home until 1 am fixing the comp issue and just woke up. I'll do the double issue next week. -- Trödel 11:23, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you were the admin that upheld this person's permanent block. I was the "victim", where this user posted to my talk page pretending to be me. Since then, this has gotten very strange with Coolcat and I talking on e-mail. Coolcat claims to know the person and states he sent him to Wikipedia and helped him establish an account. Then he claims to not know him, then he claims to know him again. I also got two e-mails from the person themself (he gave me his real name and e-mail which I can't post here) swearing this was all a misunderstanding. I have to say, I believe him. I think this is someone who didnt understand our policies and got sucked up into a very intense situation with me in the middle of an arbcom. Anyway, in all fairness, this person was not a sockpuppet and appears to be a real person. He is practically begging to be let back on the site and has apologized twice for what he did. I don't think he wants any trouble and, with regards to me, is not even involved with the arbcom. I would hate to see someone banned from this site because of trying to help me. Can we unblock him? if anything negative happens, by all means ban him for good. But, I would suggest assuming good faith and giving him a second chance. Thanks for your time. - Husnock 15:17, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi Ral315, on this: as the Signpost is fairly widely read in the community, it also sets de facto writing standards I'm certain some people follow. I therefore think it is important that the Signpost follow the applicable writing guidelines. Thanks, Mikker (...) 22:06, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Hello, I had a question in regards to a comment you made on WP:AN/I
:: Most major Wikipedia channels, including #wikipedia and #wikipedia-en-admins, allow logging for personal use only. Thus, keeping copies for one's own use would be fine, and, presumably, reading logs to generalize a situation and responses would be fine. Quoting logs, making logs public, or sharing logs without the permission of all participants in the discussion is prohibited. (It may be worth noting that even private logging is illegal in some jurisdictions, but that's another story.) Ral315 ( talk) 10:04, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
When I first saw that comment, I immediately thought that you were violating WP:NLT, which probably wasn't the intention of your words(and it probably wouldn't matter since the rules around here don't seem to matter that much anyway), but I was curious as to the meaning of what you meant.
Just to clarify since things there seem to be heated, I wish no ill will to you or anybody else in that thread, i'm just wondering how such a thing would be illegal. Just H 18:28, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Once again though, thank you for helping clear things up. Just H 03:01, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Real life, it sucks, and I hate it. Especially the holiday crap. :( -- Phroziac ♥♥♥♥ 10:17, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Ive done the ArbCom signpost story. -- Punk Boi 8 08:03, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you, Ral, and best of luck! Flcelloguy ( A note?) 20:22, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Ral, I was considering trying to write an opinion column on cases before the arbcom, in addition and seperate to the ROLL, just giving my opinion and comment. Would you be interested in seeing a pilot, or do you think it's a complete non-starter? David Mestel( Talk) 20:30, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Sorry if I'm being an idiot, but isn't Template:ArbitrationCommitteeChartRecent meant to cover the current, former, and coming year, which would be from 01-01-2006 to 31-12-2008 - but you've just changed it to be 01-01-2007 to 31-12-2009, and I'm confused. :-)
James F. (talk) 00:02, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Shouldn't there be a section in the infobox for awards? For example, the The Treasure of the Sierra Madre article has in its infobox, the following:
| awards = Oscars: Best Director John Huston
Best Writing, Screenplay, John Huston
Best Actor in a Supporting Role, Walter Huston
But it does not display because the infobox does not support an awards section. Infoboxes for actors have an awards section, shouldn't films? Fistful of Questions 15:08, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Protection of the talk page of a blocked editor should be saved for cases where it's actually required. This guy wasn't cursing, pasing in pictures of penisesus, he wasn't even using the "unblock" template. He made one comment, and a fairly mild one at that. I've lifted the protection. - brenneman 00:44, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
I won't be able to write the ROLL next Saturday, Sunday or Monday, as I'm going away. I'll most probably write a report on Thursday or Friday, and it would be great if you or someone else could update it to reflect any developments. David Mestel( Talk) 21:06, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Template:HouseCharacter has been nominated for deletion for similar reasons for The Bill episode template (for which you voted delete). You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. The JPS talk to me 13:17, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Can you help save over 14 hours of work? It started with the WV page. I'm about to leave Wiki again, it gets old when you bust your ass. No wonder they don't have they money the need, people what give when you screw with them all the time. -- 71Demon 01:33, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Hi - User:Lcarsdata has announced on his/her user page (recently) that he/she has permanently left the project but did not unsubscribe to signpost autodeliveries. Do you have any guards against the deliveries just piling up in situations like this? I happened to notice this case (and could remove the user from the delivery list), but it seems like this might be worth a more general solution (like, stopping delivery if a user's last edit is more than [pick a number] weeks/months ago). -- Rick Block ( talk) 02:21, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Hey, screw off, man. I can edit my own damn page. Why the hell do you think you have the right to just do whatever you want? Someone asked me to remove the image, and I was going to. You have no right to just do something to someone's user page without asking or explaining yourself. — Chris53516 ( Talk) 02:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
-- Docg 13:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Hey Ral, just letting you know that my profile on the signpost has only the first edit for User:Improv -- my prior account, User:Pgunn's first edit was in Dec 2002. -- Improv 16:05, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi Ral315. Thank you for the opportunity to be a part of this Signpost series.
What positions do you hold (adminship, mediation, etc.)?
Have you been involved in any arbitration cases? In what capacity?
Why are you running for the Arbitration Committee?
If you have any other questions, you know where to find me. :-) Can't sleep, clown will eat me 13:50, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Respectfully submitted, Kelly Martin ( talk) 19:35, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
I have to get medatation Re: The wikiproject report. - Nathannoblet 01:43, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
This template has 'elections underway' at December 11th, but according to the main page voting starts on December 4th. Is the date wrong, or is this intended to be an article written at the 'half way point', or something else I'm missing? -- Sam Blanning (talk) 13:24, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
I'm afraid there's a misunderstanding there. That page is not referring to WP:POST; it's referring to the internal project's newsletter, similar to how many WikiProjects do... Tito xd( ?!?) 01:19, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the questions! -- Golbez 01:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
I just reached your ArbCom voting page, which said "You're likely here because I've linked this page from my votes/opinions in the ArbCom elections." - in fact, I reached it from your signature on a talk page. I don't think that linking in this way from signatures is helpful. If you want to advertise the elections, it would be better to just link to the election page. Actually, scrub that, I've just investigated a little further, and found this diff where you are cleaning up those sigs, so I guess this was a mistake/bug of some sort. The one I spotted was in a thread at User talk:Geogre. That thread was about people starting discussions on the voting pages. For what it is worth, I think all comments should be stripped from the voting page, but the discussion/talk page should be used for people to raise concerns about the candidates. Pile-on voting is less likely if people see only a list of names in the support/oppose column. If it is not too late, is it not possible to clamp down on discussion on the actual vote pages, and to activate/create the talk pages as discussion venues? I'd like to raise this over at the election talk pages (maybe it is already being discussed there), but wanted to see what at least one other person thought first. Carcharoth 10:46, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
I recently found five possible sockpuppets of ForestH2. See my comments on Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/ForestH2. Squirepants101 23:24, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Not sure what you may be working on, but I can try to throw together a story on the one-millionth Commons file, one of the things that still needs to be covered. Hopefully won't take long to do. -- Michael Snow 03:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
I think Simetrical did have a tech report, it just wasn't listed. -- Michael Snow 05:44, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi, just doin' a litle public service and letting you know since you made the page..the 'vote' and 'questions' links for Will Beback on Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Special/2006-12/All actually link to Alex Bakharev. Dragomiloff 16:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Could you enter into Template:PMID as its decription is wrong. The template does not show the PubMed abstract number as is shown in the example.
Hence mediawiki PMID 12345 gives PMID 12345 but template of {{PMID|12345}} gives PMID 12345
So the templates description needs this code for the described outcome:
Shows: [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=12345 PubMed]
Thank you David Ruben Talk 18:15, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Try reading it in the proper mindset. Andre ( talk) 22:35, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Your input would be appreciated at this Request for Comments. Kelly Martin ( talk) 15:34, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
I noticed that you marked Freakofnuture as withdrawn from the ArbCom elections "following IRC discussions". I'm not quite sure of the best way to put this without causing offence, but is there any way that the candidate themselves can confirm this withdrawal? I notice the last contribution to date from Freakofnuture was on 3 December. Carcharoth 23:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for that. The bot actually overwrites the page every time, so it wouldn't stay, but I spotted it on my watchlist. I've made the change permanent now – Gurch 01:41, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
I have the right to do work for the Signpost.
I WILL implemt [[WP:DR].
I will take these steps.
I am also requesting a editior review to see where I Can help
Thank You
Nathannoblet 06:54, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi Ral315, Punk Boi 8 has brought this request for assistance to the Association of Members' Advocates' attention. Would you be willing to participate? Thanks, riana_dzasta 03:52, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Have you seen your new rival? Written by none other than... noblet :) -- Majo rly 19:35, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for cleaning up those bad-faith AfDs. I wasn't going to get to those for at least a few hours. I appreciate the help! | Mr. Darcy talk 02:32, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Was nosing around and saw this massive vote for the main page redesign (687). Is that the record for any single vote? I wonder what the total number voting in the various ArbCom elections has been, and how many voted in the various Wikimedia Foundation Board Elections (though that is not just en-wiki)? Oh, and I replied to your comment on my talk page. Thanks for that. Carcharoth 03:26, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
You have voted both in support of and in opposition to this candidate. Please remove (at least) one of these. — Cryptic 14:42, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Ral315 wrote:
Sorry about that. The bot was working fine, but the internet was off for several hours. Not sure why, probably some sort of maintenance as it affected the whole area. It's working again now – Gurch 03:28, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi,
I've just started an award, why not come and see what it is? Don't forget to vote!
Carrot Man 07:52, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
I spotted the 100th Signpost anniversary thing, and was wondering if the Signpost will cover the sixth anniversary of Wikipedia in January? Carcharoth 13:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Ral. IMO, polls like that are a bad idea and I don't vote in them. But, since it is going on, it has to be presumed to be the poll on the merits of the ArbCom decision, not on the merits of the case itself. As such, it's to my mind inappropriate for ArbCom members to vote in it - it's like admin candidates voting on their own RFAs, to use the closest analogy we have. I fear your vote may be perceived to be disrupting the poll, which isn't likely to do anybody any good. Zocky | picture popups 13:03, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Look, I am happy to merge only if I can somehow be involved with the signpost. I am not letting my newspaper collapsp just because you started a rouge merge.Anyway, I were never told of these requirements ever. You shold have told me so I could fix up my writing. I am very,very sorry and I think I have just wrecked my chance of getting on ArbCom next year. (sob bob). Sorry again -- Nathannoblet 06:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Just confirming that if you're interested, you can write a Signpost article; I wasn't sure if you'd checked back at the Signpost pages. If you're going to do one this week, please get it in as soon as possible; it'll probably be later than 17:00 UTC this week, but I try to get it published ASAP. Ral315 ( talk) 08:12, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Are you going to include Husnock's emergency [and likely permanent] desysopping in this week's edition? – Ch acor 16:50, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Ral315, my article, User:Ragesoss/Wikipedia and academia, is as done as it's going to get, content-wise. If you're not going to publish it this week, let me know what I need to do to get it into publishable shape.-- ragesoss 05:40, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Sorry bout that - I didn't get home until 1 am fixing the comp issue and just woke up. I'll do the double issue next week. -- Trödel 11:23, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you were the admin that upheld this person's permanent block. I was the "victim", where this user posted to my talk page pretending to be me. Since then, this has gotten very strange with Coolcat and I talking on e-mail. Coolcat claims to know the person and states he sent him to Wikipedia and helped him establish an account. Then he claims to not know him, then he claims to know him again. I also got two e-mails from the person themself (he gave me his real name and e-mail which I can't post here) swearing this was all a misunderstanding. I have to say, I believe him. I think this is someone who didnt understand our policies and got sucked up into a very intense situation with me in the middle of an arbcom. Anyway, in all fairness, this person was not a sockpuppet and appears to be a real person. He is practically begging to be let back on the site and has apologized twice for what he did. I don't think he wants any trouble and, with regards to me, is not even involved with the arbcom. I would hate to see someone banned from this site because of trying to help me. Can we unblock him? if anything negative happens, by all means ban him for good. But, I would suggest assuming good faith and giving him a second chance. Thanks for your time. - Husnock 15:17, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi Ral315, on this: as the Signpost is fairly widely read in the community, it also sets de facto writing standards I'm certain some people follow. I therefore think it is important that the Signpost follow the applicable writing guidelines. Thanks, Mikker (...) 22:06, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Hello, I had a question in regards to a comment you made on WP:AN/I
:: Most major Wikipedia channels, including #wikipedia and #wikipedia-en-admins, allow logging for personal use only. Thus, keeping copies for one's own use would be fine, and, presumably, reading logs to generalize a situation and responses would be fine. Quoting logs, making logs public, or sharing logs without the permission of all participants in the discussion is prohibited. (It may be worth noting that even private logging is illegal in some jurisdictions, but that's another story.) Ral315 ( talk) 10:04, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
When I first saw that comment, I immediately thought that you were violating WP:NLT, which probably wasn't the intention of your words(and it probably wouldn't matter since the rules around here don't seem to matter that much anyway), but I was curious as to the meaning of what you meant.
Just to clarify since things there seem to be heated, I wish no ill will to you or anybody else in that thread, i'm just wondering how such a thing would be illegal. Just H 18:28, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Once again though, thank you for helping clear things up. Just H 03:01, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Real life, it sucks, and I hate it. Especially the holiday crap. :( -- Phroziac ♥♥♥♥ 10:17, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Ive done the ArbCom signpost story. -- Punk Boi 8 08:03, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you, Ral, and best of luck! Flcelloguy ( A note?) 20:22, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Ral, I was considering trying to write an opinion column on cases before the arbcom, in addition and seperate to the ROLL, just giving my opinion and comment. Would you be interested in seeing a pilot, or do you think it's a complete non-starter? David Mestel( Talk) 20:30, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Sorry if I'm being an idiot, but isn't Template:ArbitrationCommitteeChartRecent meant to cover the current, former, and coming year, which would be from 01-01-2006 to 31-12-2008 - but you've just changed it to be 01-01-2007 to 31-12-2009, and I'm confused. :-)
James F. (talk) 00:02, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Shouldn't there be a section in the infobox for awards? For example, the The Treasure of the Sierra Madre article has in its infobox, the following:
| awards = Oscars: Best Director John Huston
Best Writing, Screenplay, John Huston
Best Actor in a Supporting Role, Walter Huston
But it does not display because the infobox does not support an awards section. Infoboxes for actors have an awards section, shouldn't films? Fistful of Questions 15:08, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Protection of the talk page of a blocked editor should be saved for cases where it's actually required. This guy wasn't cursing, pasing in pictures of penisesus, he wasn't even using the "unblock" template. He made one comment, and a fairly mild one at that. I've lifted the protection. - brenneman 00:44, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
I won't be able to write the ROLL next Saturday, Sunday or Monday, as I'm going away. I'll most probably write a report on Thursday or Friday, and it would be great if you or someone else could update it to reflect any developments. David Mestel( Talk) 21:06, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Template:HouseCharacter has been nominated for deletion for similar reasons for The Bill episode template (for which you voted delete). You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. The JPS talk to me 13:17, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Can you help save over 14 hours of work? It started with the WV page. I'm about to leave Wiki again, it gets old when you bust your ass. No wonder they don't have they money the need, people what give when you screw with them all the time. -- 71Demon 01:33, 31 December 2006 (UTC)