Hello! Rahulmdinesh,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
|
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Gilgit–Baltistan, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Shovon ( talk) 18:43, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Azad Kashmir. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shovon ( talk) 18:44, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at K2. Favonian ( talk) 09:59, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Favonian (
talk) 10:06, 17 April 2014 (UTC)Fiddle Faddle 10:42, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 10:49, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Fiddle Faddle 11:06, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
As it has been said, sourcing from reputable sources is needed to establish notability. If there aren't proper sources to get your article published, it may just not be notable. Keep searching but for the moment I would take a break from article creation. In time the school may prove notable and get wider coverage, but at the moment it does not have that. hewhoam areismyself 17:00, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
— CutestPenguin Hangout 15:25, 8 October 2014 (UTC){{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist ( talk) 10:41, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Your recent changes on the article National Centre for Excellence as been removed since it seems to be the case of conflict of interest. You are requested to maintain neutral point of view while editing and writing articles on Wikipedia. Also, make sure the information you add should be aided with reliable sources so that it can be verified. You are requested to avoid reverting without discussing. Cheers! — CutestPenguin Hangout 16:22, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with National Centre for Excellence. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. — CutestPenguin Hangout 14:32, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at National Centre for Excellence, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. If you have an issue with the content that has been repeatedly been removed by CutestPenguin and myself, bring it up on the talk page for a discussion to occur. Do not keep reverting or you will be blocked for violating the edit warring rules. Primefac ( talk) 00:23, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Content dispute and other issues. Thank you. Primefac ( talk) 03:30, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
National Centre for Excellence. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Bladesmulti ( talk) 03:50, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Bladesmulti ( talk) 04:01, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Bbb23 (
talk) 05:36, 20 December 2014 (UTC) |
Hello, Rahulmdinesh. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled " sandbox".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at
WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:Rahulmdinesh/sandbox}}
, paste it in the edit box at
this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo ( talk) 20:15, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Rahulmdinesh ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #15842 was submitted on May 23, 2016 09:15:26. This review is now closed.
Hello! Rahulmdinesh,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
|
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Gilgit–Baltistan, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Shovon ( talk) 18:43, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Azad Kashmir. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shovon ( talk) 18:44, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at K2. Favonian ( talk) 09:59, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Favonian (
talk) 10:06, 17 April 2014 (UTC)Fiddle Faddle 10:42, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 10:49, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Fiddle Faddle 11:06, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
As it has been said, sourcing from reputable sources is needed to establish notability. If there aren't proper sources to get your article published, it may just not be notable. Keep searching but for the moment I would take a break from article creation. In time the school may prove notable and get wider coverage, but at the moment it does not have that. hewhoam areismyself 17:00, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
— CutestPenguin Hangout 15:25, 8 October 2014 (UTC){{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist ( talk) 10:41, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Your recent changes on the article National Centre for Excellence as been removed since it seems to be the case of conflict of interest. You are requested to maintain neutral point of view while editing and writing articles on Wikipedia. Also, make sure the information you add should be aided with reliable sources so that it can be verified. You are requested to avoid reverting without discussing. Cheers! — CutestPenguin Hangout 16:22, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with National Centre for Excellence. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. — CutestPenguin Hangout 14:32, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at National Centre for Excellence, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. If you have an issue with the content that has been repeatedly been removed by CutestPenguin and myself, bring it up on the talk page for a discussion to occur. Do not keep reverting or you will be blocked for violating the edit warring rules. Primefac ( talk) 00:23, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Content dispute and other issues. Thank you. Primefac ( talk) 03:30, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
National Centre for Excellence. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Bladesmulti ( talk) 03:50, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Bladesmulti ( talk) 04:01, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Bbb23 (
talk) 05:36, 20 December 2014 (UTC) |
Hello, Rahulmdinesh. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled " sandbox".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at
WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:Rahulmdinesh/sandbox}}
, paste it in the edit box at
this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo ( talk) 20:15, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Rahulmdinesh ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #15842 was submitted on May 23, 2016 09:15:26. This review is now closed.