Hello, I'm
Kleuske. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Octocat have been undone because they appeared to be promotional.
Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "
soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a
neutral perspective. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Kleuske (
talk) 13:58, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Your recent edit to
Octocat appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list
should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's
notability guideline. Thank you.
MarginalCost (
talk) 14:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Octocat. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our
help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Octocat was changed by Qwerty 12345688999 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.90252 on 2018-06-22T14:27:39+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 14:27, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Octocat, you may be blocked from editing. Kleuske ( talk) 14:30, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Octocat shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Kleuske ( talk) 14:35, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Qwerty_12345688999 reported by User:Kleuske (Result: ). Thank you.
Kleuske (
talk) 14:40, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Jauerback
dude?/
dude. 14:42, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Kleuske. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Octocat have been undone because they appeared to be promotional.
Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "
soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a
neutral perspective. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Kleuske (
talk) 13:58, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Your recent edit to
Octocat appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list
should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's
notability guideline. Thank you.
MarginalCost (
talk) 14:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Octocat. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our
help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Octocat was changed by Qwerty 12345688999 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.90252 on 2018-06-22T14:27:39+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 14:27, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Octocat, you may be blocked from editing. Kleuske ( talk) 14:30, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Octocat shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Kleuske ( talk) 14:35, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Qwerty_12345688999 reported by User:Kleuske (Result: ). Thank you.
Kleuske (
talk) 14:40, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Jauerback
dude?/
dude. 14:42, 22 June 2018 (UTC)