Archives ( Index) |
This page is archived by
ClueBot III.
|
Hi QuietHere, I just wanted to let you know that I removed the rcat you added to this category redirect, as the docs for {{ R from alternative spelling}} say that it shouldn't be used on soft redirects.
All the best, — a smart kitten[ meow 22:17, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
This is a documentation subpage) in the documentation - "This template should not be...used to tag soft redirects". WP:REDCAT § When to categorize a redirect also says that soft-redirects shouldn't be tagged with rcats, with the exception (for categories) of {{ R category with possibilities}}. All the best, — a smart kitten[ meow 07:54, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
QuietHere, you reverted an edit I made on Letter to Yu, where the original genre listing was shown as synthpop, but I converted it to match the genre article listing of synth-pop. I do not understand your reversion, as one is a misspelling and the other was the correct spelling, as shown by matching the article, Synth-pop. There was debate at the synth-pop article talk page about whether it should be synthpop or synth-pop, see Talk:Synth-pop/Archive 3#Requested move 19 February 2017, and it landed on naming the article synth-pop. Therefore, every time I see a misapplied synthpop, I correct it to synth-pop. I will probably be reverting your reversion at Letter to Yu, but I will pause to allow a discussion or debate why it should not be corrected. Mburrell ( talk) 10:42, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Should in most cases be the most important value, because it's the rowheader [1]. That is not the year, which is less important than the title of the single. There is obviously no hard and fast rule about how to layout discography tables, but the title takes precedence over the year because it's a section about which singles were released, not when they were released. I know you think you do, but you do not need to take issue with literally almost every formatting-related edit I make to an article you have contributed to or created. Ss 112 09:06, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
WP:3RR. Stop reverting. Stop being condescending in your edit summaries. Oh and juust because something has been done a certain way for a period of time doesn't mean it always have to be that way. Things can change. Plus, you never directed to any discussion where consensus was reached. Mr. C.C. Hey yo! I didn't do it! 12:22, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi, you added "This article uses they for consistency." to the refs but the page uses she and they pronouns interchangeably. Is this an oversight or am I missing something? Thanks. Estiblue ( talk) 22:54, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Do you know exactly where more citations are needed for Vended, why it looks like an ad, and how it needs cleanup? -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 14:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi QuietHere, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.
Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.
Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Muboshgu ( talk) 19:29, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
I saw your suggestion to me on the Super Magick page to add citations to info, which is fine. I don’t usually see citations in infoboxes, so I left them out. As there are only two citations on the page, I think it’d be a cool move to check those references for data suspected to not be sourced rather than removing the data as unsourced or suggesting someone’s making it up. It’s totally cool if you don’t want to do that, but I think in that case, it’s maybe more friendly to use the talk page to hash out a plan than to just remove data that you don’t want to verify in citations already present on the page. I appreciate you taking the time to sort that out, though! Louie Mantia ( talk) 10:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi @ QuietHere. Take a look for which one you prefer at the "Release history" table: "Distributor", "Licensee", "Marketer" or "Promoter". 183.171.122.169 ( talk) 17:43, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Hey, umm, can you please help me on something i am doing? Toby2023 ( talk) 19:49, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=White_Roses%2C_My_God&oldid=prev&diff=1219445105 re: MOS:SEASON. Thanks. ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 20:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Hey Buddy,
Would you be interested in starting a page for this album? KARANSUTTA ( talk) 18:05, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Category:American men centenarians has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 23:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello there. So I've been thinking about the nomination for Category:American men centenarians and I realize you are right about diffusing it. For that reason I've withdrawn my nomination. I wanted to ask if you're willing to help out on the matter and expand this particular tree beyond just "American men centenarians". We can start by populating this category and making an American women's category as well. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 14:29, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi @ QuietHere! I'm currently working on a draft for Jasper Marsalis and I've clocked you as the creator and primary contributor to the article surrounding his 2023 album Excelsior. Would you be interested in taking a look at what I've got so far (which, at the time of my writing this, is not much) and potentially contributing to this draft? There seems to be a lot of content about him online - definitely enough to warrant an article.
Also - you have great music taste! I've been tapped in for quite a while, and I've always wondered why Jasper didn't have a standalone article or really any significant mention on Wikipedia until recently. His content, in my opinion, is too interesting and genre-bending not to write about. Joeyquism ( talk) 04:32, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk) 23:02, 13 May 2024 (UTC)One year! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Archives ( Index) |
This page is archived by
ClueBot III.
|
Hi QuietHere, I just wanted to let you know that I removed the rcat you added to this category redirect, as the docs for {{ R from alternative spelling}} say that it shouldn't be used on soft redirects.
All the best, — a smart kitten[ meow 22:17, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
This is a documentation subpage) in the documentation - "This template should not be...used to tag soft redirects". WP:REDCAT § When to categorize a redirect also says that soft-redirects shouldn't be tagged with rcats, with the exception (for categories) of {{ R category with possibilities}}. All the best, — a smart kitten[ meow 07:54, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
QuietHere, you reverted an edit I made on Letter to Yu, where the original genre listing was shown as synthpop, but I converted it to match the genre article listing of synth-pop. I do not understand your reversion, as one is a misspelling and the other was the correct spelling, as shown by matching the article, Synth-pop. There was debate at the synth-pop article talk page about whether it should be synthpop or synth-pop, see Talk:Synth-pop/Archive 3#Requested move 19 February 2017, and it landed on naming the article synth-pop. Therefore, every time I see a misapplied synthpop, I correct it to synth-pop. I will probably be reverting your reversion at Letter to Yu, but I will pause to allow a discussion or debate why it should not be corrected. Mburrell ( talk) 10:42, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Should in most cases be the most important value, because it's the rowheader [1]. That is not the year, which is less important than the title of the single. There is obviously no hard and fast rule about how to layout discography tables, but the title takes precedence over the year because it's a section about which singles were released, not when they were released. I know you think you do, but you do not need to take issue with literally almost every formatting-related edit I make to an article you have contributed to or created. Ss 112 09:06, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
WP:3RR. Stop reverting. Stop being condescending in your edit summaries. Oh and juust because something has been done a certain way for a period of time doesn't mean it always have to be that way. Things can change. Plus, you never directed to any discussion where consensus was reached. Mr. C.C. Hey yo! I didn't do it! 12:22, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi, you added "This article uses they for consistency." to the refs but the page uses she and they pronouns interchangeably. Is this an oversight or am I missing something? Thanks. Estiblue ( talk) 22:54, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Do you know exactly where more citations are needed for Vended, why it looks like an ad, and how it needs cleanup? -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 14:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi QuietHere, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.
Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.
Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Muboshgu ( talk) 19:29, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
I saw your suggestion to me on the Super Magick page to add citations to info, which is fine. I don’t usually see citations in infoboxes, so I left them out. As there are only two citations on the page, I think it’d be a cool move to check those references for data suspected to not be sourced rather than removing the data as unsourced or suggesting someone’s making it up. It’s totally cool if you don’t want to do that, but I think in that case, it’s maybe more friendly to use the talk page to hash out a plan than to just remove data that you don’t want to verify in citations already present on the page. I appreciate you taking the time to sort that out, though! Louie Mantia ( talk) 10:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi @ QuietHere. Take a look for which one you prefer at the "Release history" table: "Distributor", "Licensee", "Marketer" or "Promoter". 183.171.122.169 ( talk) 17:43, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Hey, umm, can you please help me on something i am doing? Toby2023 ( talk) 19:49, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=White_Roses%2C_My_God&oldid=prev&diff=1219445105 re: MOS:SEASON. Thanks. ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 20:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Hey Buddy,
Would you be interested in starting a page for this album? KARANSUTTA ( talk) 18:05, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Category:American men centenarians has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 23:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello there. So I've been thinking about the nomination for Category:American men centenarians and I realize you are right about diffusing it. For that reason I've withdrawn my nomination. I wanted to ask if you're willing to help out on the matter and expand this particular tree beyond just "American men centenarians". We can start by populating this category and making an American women's category as well. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 14:29, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi @ QuietHere! I'm currently working on a draft for Jasper Marsalis and I've clocked you as the creator and primary contributor to the article surrounding his 2023 album Excelsior. Would you be interested in taking a look at what I've got so far (which, at the time of my writing this, is not much) and potentially contributing to this draft? There seems to be a lot of content about him online - definitely enough to warrant an article.
Also - you have great music taste! I've been tapped in for quite a while, and I've always wondered why Jasper didn't have a standalone article or really any significant mention on Wikipedia until recently. His content, in my opinion, is too interesting and genre-bending not to write about. Joeyquism ( talk) 04:32, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk) 23:02, 13 May 2024 (UTC)One year! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC)