![]() | On 1 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Eston railway station, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the opening of Eston railway station (pictured in 1902) enabled passengers to travel from Middlesbrough, England, to California in only 15 minutes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Eston railway station.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 08:03, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi, the project page says that applications will officially begin being accepted between April 2 and April 9th, with accounts distributed by April 16th. That's the timeline, and everything is going as planned. Glad you signed up! Ocaasi t | c 17:53, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Titanic Memorial, Belfast, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Andrews ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:57, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Prioryman. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click
HERE to participate. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 11:56, 5 April 2012 (UTC) |
Please check out
suggestions here -- In case you haven't noticed, the 100th anniversary of the Titanic event is comming soon, and there will certainly be increased traffic on the subject.
~Regards, Eric F
184.76.225.106 (
talk)
14:32, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
P.s.:
See also. ~E
184.76.225.106 (
talk)
16:47, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello. I took out the reference to Olympic's weight, as the figure given would have been her maximum displacement. I saw somewhere that the liner burned 600+ tons of fuel a day, and stores and water would have been depleted. In addition, the ship likely was nowhere near capacity in passengers and baggage. Some work has been done on Titanic's displacement when sunk; I believe it was about 48,000t, or 5,000t less than maximum. Olympic had nearly completed her crossing when she demolished the lightship. Does Chirnside give displacement figures for when the collision occurred? Regards, Kablammo ( talk) 19:50, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Incidentally, the terms gross tonnage and gross register tonnage are measures of volume, not of weight, and should never be used to refer to weight in marine usage. Kablammo ( talk) 14:28, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Kablammo ( talk) 16:33, 6 April 2012 (UTC)if Olympic was loaded to a light draught of 27 feet 10½ inches, she would displace 40,850 tons. In this condition, the light draught, the ship’s boilers would be full, but there would be no fuel, fresh water or stores onboard the ship
I've been doing stuff with the list, you might want to check on it to see if the changes meet with your approval. I just thought I'd help get that page "ship-shape"[pun intended] before the April 15 launch. ~Eric F 184.76.225.106 ( talk) 02:11, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Titanic Belfast at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Harrias
talk
14:10, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Please see my entry on the RMS Titanic lifeboat talk page, re: "S.S. Titanic" designation. ~Eric F 184.76.225.106 ( talk) 16:48, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I've reviewed the above nomination and there are several issues. Thank you Crisco 1492 ( talk) 13:02, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
You've broken a lot of citations with your rewrite of the "Culture" section. Can you please clean that up? See the end of the "References" section. — Diiscool ( talk) 17:52, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
This is a note to let the main editors of Sinking of the RMS Titanic know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on April 15, 2012. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 15, 2012. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 ( talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:
The sinking of the RMS Titanic on 15 April 1912, with the loss of over 1,500 lives, was one of the deadliest peacetime maritime disasters in history. Four days into her maiden voyage from Southampton to New York, Titanic – at the time the world's largest ship – struck an iceberg in the North Atlantic off Newfoundland. Five of her watertight compartments were holed, causing the ship to flood deck by deck. She carried too few lifeboats for her 2,223 passengers and crew, and many seats were left empty due to a poorly managed evacuation. Titanic's officers loaded the lifeboats "women and children first", leaving most of the men aboard the ship. Two hours and forty minutes after the collision, Titanic sank with over a thousand people still aboard. Almost all those who jumped or fell into the freezing water soon died of hypothermia or drowned. The RMS Carpathia rescued the survivors from the lifeboats a few hours later. Public outrage at the loss of life led to tougher maritime safety regulations. Titanic's wreck was not found until 1985. The disaster has inspired a wealth of popular culture including many films, most notably James Cameron's Titanic in 1997. ( more...)
UcuchaBot ( talk) 23:02, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
For clarity, the caption for image: Titanic porting around (on Sinking of the RMS Titanic page) should include: Red = path of stern, Blue = path of bow. -- Note: I added that to image description. ~Eric F 184.76.225.106 ( talk) 03:05, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:09, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
I believe your statement that the lounge is a dining room, but the article doesn't mention that fact. A DYK hook needs to be clearly supported by the article. If you want to use the word "taste" in the DYK hook, the article should tell about food. -- Orlady ( talk) 13:22, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know:
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:57, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 14 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article United States lightship LV-117, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that seven men died when United States lightship LV-117 (pictured), the Nantucket lightship, was rammed and sunk on 14 May 1934 by RMS Olympic, sister ship of the lost RMS Titanic? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/United States lightship LV-117.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 16:03, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 15 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article A Night to Remember (book), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Walter Lord's 1955 book A Night to Remember has been described as a "defining moment" in the creation of the myth of the RMS Titanic? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/A Night to Remember (book).You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 00:03, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your efforts on the Sinking of the RMS Titanic article; it's a pleasure to read. It's not often we get such a massive article featured, and it's just unspeakably wonderful when we do. Thank you. ceran thor 04:26, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 15 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Titanic Memorial, Belfast, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Titanic Memorial in Belfast (pictured) depicts a personification of Death holding a wreath above the head of a drowned sailor who is borne above the waves by mermaids? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Titanic Memorial, Belfast.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady ( talk) 08:03, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 15 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Animals aboard the RMS Titanic, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that 100 English foxhounds narrowly avoided being among the animals aboard the RMS Titanic during her disastrous maiden voyage? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Animals aboard the RMS Titanic.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady ( talk) 08:03, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 15 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article RMS Titanic in popular culture, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that commemorations of the RMS Titanic in popular culture have included songs, poems, plays, musicals, films, books and even black teddy bears? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/RMS Titanic in popular culture.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady ( talk) 08:04, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
My apologies for changing the class from B to List for Lifeboats of the RMS Titanic. I know you are a hardworker on that; sometimes, I see things differently, such as List of Sailor Moon characters. To make up my misconceptions, I am proposing a merger of the below orchestra members into Orchestra of the RMS Titanic:
What do you say? -- George Ho ( talk) 11:55, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
I have created
Musicians of the RMS Titanic. Also, I have created a proposal in
WP:Proposed mergers. --
George Ho (
talk)
18:37, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 15 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Saved from the Titanic, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Saved from the Titanic, starring Titanic survivor Dorothy Gibson (shown in poster), was the first film made about the sinking of the Titanic and was released only 29 days after the disaster? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Saved from the Titanic.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 16:03, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 15 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Titanic Belfast, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the new Titanic Belfast visitor attraction tells the story of the ill-fated RMS Titanic through interactive videos, audio, replicas and displays? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Titanic Belfast.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 16:06, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 15 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article White Swan Hotel, Alnwick, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a sample of the First Class experience aboard the RMS Titanic and Olympic can be found at the White Swan Hotel in Alnwick? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 16:07, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
WikiProject Ships Barnstar | |
Thank you for the barnstar. Soerfm ( talk) 22:05, 15 April 2012 (UTC) |
![]() | On 16 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Masabumi Hosono, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the only Japanese passenger aboard the Titanic survived, but was then shunned as a coward in his home country for not going down with the ship? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Masabumi Hosono.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 00:03, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
I noticed the flurry of Titanic-related articles at DYK for this weekend. I'd intended to finish off two I was working on, but missed the boat, so to speak... (yeah, terrible pun). I'd still like to nominate them for DYK, but as you (and others) have done such huge amounts of work on the Titanic articles recently, I thought I'd drop off links to the two new articles here first, in the hope that you or others could help polish them up a bit, add stuff I've missed or don't have sources for, that sort of thing (and add in links from the existing Titanic articles, something I never remember to do). The articles are on the two inquiries that took place following the disaster: United States Senate inquiry into the sinking of the RMS Titanic and British Wreck Commissioner's inquiry into the sinking of the RMS Titanic. Possibly some additional redirects are needed as well. Oh, and the trick to make part of the title italics (as in the Sinking of the RMS Titanic article). Talking of which, hope the day on the main page with that article went OK. Carcharoth ( talk) 00:20, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
I have now nominated the two article at DYK, and am starting the rather long task of adding links from existing Titanic articles. I'll also mention the two new articles on the talk pages of the articles on Titanic and its sinking, as that might help bring in other editors as well. I am also going to ask at WT:DYK if there is an outside chance of them being put up this week, to still catch some of the centenary feel (the US inquiry opened on 19 April), but I'm not sure whether that argument will fly for just these two articles.
At the moment, the articles are mostly just basic facts and figures. There is a fair amount of opinion out there about them (in the vast literature about Titanic), but that will take time to add in a way that doesn't unbalance the articles. Also, the French Wikipedia has an article that combines the two topics. I only became aware of that after doing the two separately. Some articles refer to "the inquiries" (plural) and it is hard to link at that point, so maybe a brief overview page might help - it could include some of the less well known inquiries or hearings, such as something called the limitations of liabilities hearings, and something even more obscure, called the 'Second Bulkhead Committee' (established by the Board of Trade), and chaired by Archibald Denny, the same guy who unveiled one of the memorials (the Southampton one to the engineers, I think). Carcharoth ( talk) 21:28, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Update: I added you to the British inquiry DYK nomination here. Do you want to suggest an alternate hook there? QPQs are done, just waiting for someone to pick up the review. I did post to WT:DYK, but I think the moment may have passed, so may have to wait a while in the queue. Carcharoth ( talk) 06:33, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Briefly following up on a side-matter here. I had seen references to that play you mentioned, and had notes on it in my draft article, but it didn't make it into the version I saved (it should have done). An external link and something based on that Guardian article you mentioned would go nicely in the article. Do you have a link to the article if it is online? Never been to Northern Ireland, but I did consider asking someone to ask if pictures were possible for the article, unlikely but you never know. Can't remember how long it runs for. If there is independent coverage of the TV drama that was broadcast by BBC Northern Ireland (the one that included Paul McGann), that could be worth mentioning (currently only an external link). I did vaguely notice some other dramatisations done on the inquiry over the years (BBC radio, I think?), so a small section on all this might even be possible. Not sure how stable the article needs to be for DYK though. Carcharoth ( talk) 23:31, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for working to clarify the username policy. As changes here may affect the work performed by administrators working to review UAA I have asked for their input so we may see some other suggestions on the policy talkpage. Regards, 7 23:34, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I was looking through new pages for Mother's Day DYK hooks. I presume that's the intention of Leontina Albina Espinoza? If so, well done sir. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja
I've responded to your concerns for the Bat'leth DYK. I'm not sure a rewrite is nessecary as I've virtually removed the unencyclopedic canon section (which also included the stuff that was similar to the other page) and it is now (just) over the limit so it doesn't really need expansion. The C of E. God Save The Queen! ( talk) 11:14, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
You seem like you need one for all you've been through.
Bearian (
talk)
23:49, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
I've nominated Mothers and Other Liars. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 00:06, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! I hope I'm not intruding, I've just been wondering about a stance I've heard regarding the page, namely that it is a synthesis. I read the first citation, and though much of it seemed pertinent, let me focus on one part.
"Language both reflected socialist isolation and promoted socialist consciousness. For example, it was an important factor in distinguishing supporters of the German social democracy from other Germans. Four particular words - vorwärts, Arbeiter, Genosse, and frei - took on distinctive connotations that made them special if not exclusive property of the social-democratic movement in the years before the first world war. Vorwärts simply means "forward", but as a name for a journal or an organization such as a singing club, it was generally applied only to socialist undertakings."
(I bolded what I felt to be a pertinent section) I read that and I said okay, what is in the article seems sourced, but will it survive a notability challenge? The source refers to a limited time frame and limited geographical scope, should that factor in to its use as a citation, etc. What I've found (besides two clashing ideologies which both have seemed to decide that 'socialist' can only be a pejorative as opposed to something that has historical meaning) is that many people continue to argue synthesis. I can't edit there at the moment, but I wanted to ask something of you as you seemed experienced with the AFD process (by the way I found your argument pointing out the other AFD's closure, maintaining the knowledge for use in other articles, to be incredibly compelling).
Had you read the section I quoted above? If so is there a way I'm interpreting original research that misses some subtlety? I'm thinking I may return to the discussion since I was vocal to begin with and I might as well advance the conversation for my part, but in doing so I want my contribution to be as informed and reasoned as is possible. Thank you for your time! 68.229.93.129 ( talk) 01:34, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Please let other editors hammer out the details of the ban. Nobody Ent 17:33, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Does this work for you? (Please focus only on the wording and make no statements about the other editor). Nobody Ent 17:44, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Can you agree to this?
The community is imposing a binding interaction ban on Delicious Carbuncle and Prioryman. Each will not comment on, or otherwise interact with the other at any venue on Wikipedia. Reporting or otherwise mentioning the other editor is not permitted on Wikipedia. If either editor wishes to report a suspected violation of the interaction ban or has a question regarding the ban they will email any administrator of their choice. Per policy, appeals to the ban may be made to Arbcom.
-- Avanu ( talk) 19:58, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
The article
Black Stone you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Black Stone for comments about the article. Well done! There is a backlog of articles waiting for review, why not help out and
review a nominated article yourself?
GoP
T
C
N
08:45, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 13 May 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Human–animal breastfeeding, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that human–animal breastfeeding – women breastfeeding young animals, or animals breastfeeding human children, such as goats (pictured) – has been practised throughout history? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady ( talk) 08:02, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 13 May 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Leontina Albina Espinoza, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Leontina Albina Espinoza of Colina, Chile, claimed to have given birth to 58 children and was cited for a time by the Guinness Book of Records as the world's most prolific mother? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Leontina Albina Espinoza.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 16:06, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for catching that, it was completely unintentional. SwisterTwister talk 01:04, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, I was on a break. Can't advise you anyway, I don't get involved in that. Dougweller ( talk) 14:27, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Pont Flavien at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Zanhe (
talk)
21:29, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 21 May 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pont Flavien, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Pont Flavien (pictured) in southern France is the only bridge with an arch over each end to have survived from the time of the Roman emperor Augustus? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pont Flavien.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Carabinieri ( talk) 08:02, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Please don't re-add that inappropriate summary. NE should be trouted or worse for that sweeping attack. You and Dan both mean well here. Br'er Rabbit ( talk) 19:22, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
I wanted to let you know that after both hooks on the investigations were put into Prep 3, one after the other, Carabinieri subsequently merged them into a single hook. If you have a problem with this, or with the resulting double hook, you'll need to say something very soon. There's a discussion section in WT:DYK about it. BlueMoonset ( talk) 02:47, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 24 May 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article British Wreck Commissioner's inquiry into the sinking of the RMS Titanic, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the British inquiry into the sinking of the RMS Titanic was criticised as a "whitewash" after Lord Mersey (pictured) found that the disaster had not been caused by negligence? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/British Wreck Commissioner's inquiry into the sinking of the RMS Titanic.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 08:03, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 24 May 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article United States Senate inquiry into the sinking of the RMS Titanic, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the United States Senate inquiry into the sinking of the RMS Titanic declared the disaster an " act of God" because nobody could be held liable for it under maritime law? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/United States Senate inquiry into the sinking of the RMS Titanic.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 16:04, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Just checking on the page views for those two Titanic DYKs, and the British inquiry (in the lead position with an image) got over 9000, while the US inquiry (in the second position in its set) got just under 5000. Nothing to match the 28,000 of Wreck of the RMS Titanic from March, but still not too bad compared to the other Titanic DYKs I found on DYKSTATS. Do you know where that listing of Titanic articles by page views that you compiled is? Carcharoth ( talk) 07:27, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Prioryman, I've passed Bare-faced Messiah as a good article, good work on that. I've been working on William S. Sadler for a while, you might find that article interesting--there are some parallels between him and Hubbard. (Notable difference too, not the least of which is that Sadler was a psychiatrist.) Martin Gardner wrote one of the books I'm using for a source on Sadler, so it was interesting to see his name pop up in the review. Alright, BTW, I'll try to review your Iceland museum article, that looks quite interesting. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:56, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
For your terrific work on Street House Anglo-Saxon cemetery and in general on wikipedia. Thankyou! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:40, 30 May 2012 (UTC) |
Thought you might want to expand Taxatio Ecclesiastica.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:54, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Resolved by motion that:
The restriction imposed on Prioryman ( talk · contribs) by Remedy 11.6 of the Climate change case (" ChrisO topic-banned") is hereby lifted.
For the Arbitration Committee,
Lord Roem (
talk)
17:52, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
I mentioned you here. Cla68 ( talk) 00:25, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Resolved by motion that:
The restriction imposed on Prioryman ( talk · contribs) by Remedy 17 of the Scientology case (" ChrisO restricted") is hereby lifted.
For the Arbitration Committee, Lord Roem ( talk) 02:41, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 1 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Eston railway station, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the opening of Eston railway station (pictured in 1902) enabled passengers to travel from Middlesbrough, England, to California in only 15 minutes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Eston railway station.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 08:03, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi, the project page says that applications will officially begin being accepted between April 2 and April 9th, with accounts distributed by April 16th. That's the timeline, and everything is going as planned. Glad you signed up! Ocaasi t | c 17:53, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Titanic Memorial, Belfast, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Andrews ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:57, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Prioryman. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click
HERE to participate. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 11:56, 5 April 2012 (UTC) |
Please check out
suggestions here -- In case you haven't noticed, the 100th anniversary of the Titanic event is comming soon, and there will certainly be increased traffic on the subject.
~Regards, Eric F
184.76.225.106 (
talk)
14:32, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
P.s.:
See also. ~E
184.76.225.106 (
talk)
16:47, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello. I took out the reference to Olympic's weight, as the figure given would have been her maximum displacement. I saw somewhere that the liner burned 600+ tons of fuel a day, and stores and water would have been depleted. In addition, the ship likely was nowhere near capacity in passengers and baggage. Some work has been done on Titanic's displacement when sunk; I believe it was about 48,000t, or 5,000t less than maximum. Olympic had nearly completed her crossing when she demolished the lightship. Does Chirnside give displacement figures for when the collision occurred? Regards, Kablammo ( talk) 19:50, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Incidentally, the terms gross tonnage and gross register tonnage are measures of volume, not of weight, and should never be used to refer to weight in marine usage. Kablammo ( talk) 14:28, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Kablammo ( talk) 16:33, 6 April 2012 (UTC)if Olympic was loaded to a light draught of 27 feet 10½ inches, she would displace 40,850 tons. In this condition, the light draught, the ship’s boilers would be full, but there would be no fuel, fresh water or stores onboard the ship
I've been doing stuff with the list, you might want to check on it to see if the changes meet with your approval. I just thought I'd help get that page "ship-shape"[pun intended] before the April 15 launch. ~Eric F 184.76.225.106 ( talk) 02:11, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Titanic Belfast at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Harrias
talk
14:10, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Please see my entry on the RMS Titanic lifeboat talk page, re: "S.S. Titanic" designation. ~Eric F 184.76.225.106 ( talk) 16:48, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I've reviewed the above nomination and there are several issues. Thank you Crisco 1492 ( talk) 13:02, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
You've broken a lot of citations with your rewrite of the "Culture" section. Can you please clean that up? See the end of the "References" section. — Diiscool ( talk) 17:52, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
This is a note to let the main editors of Sinking of the RMS Titanic know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on April 15, 2012. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 15, 2012. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 ( talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:
The sinking of the RMS Titanic on 15 April 1912, with the loss of over 1,500 lives, was one of the deadliest peacetime maritime disasters in history. Four days into her maiden voyage from Southampton to New York, Titanic – at the time the world's largest ship – struck an iceberg in the North Atlantic off Newfoundland. Five of her watertight compartments were holed, causing the ship to flood deck by deck. She carried too few lifeboats for her 2,223 passengers and crew, and many seats were left empty due to a poorly managed evacuation. Titanic's officers loaded the lifeboats "women and children first", leaving most of the men aboard the ship. Two hours and forty minutes after the collision, Titanic sank with over a thousand people still aboard. Almost all those who jumped or fell into the freezing water soon died of hypothermia or drowned. The RMS Carpathia rescued the survivors from the lifeboats a few hours later. Public outrage at the loss of life led to tougher maritime safety regulations. Titanic's wreck was not found until 1985. The disaster has inspired a wealth of popular culture including many films, most notably James Cameron's Titanic in 1997. ( more...)
UcuchaBot ( talk) 23:02, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
For clarity, the caption for image: Titanic porting around (on Sinking of the RMS Titanic page) should include: Red = path of stern, Blue = path of bow. -- Note: I added that to image description. ~Eric F 184.76.225.106 ( talk) 03:05, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:09, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
I believe your statement that the lounge is a dining room, but the article doesn't mention that fact. A DYK hook needs to be clearly supported by the article. If you want to use the word "taste" in the DYK hook, the article should tell about food. -- Orlady ( talk) 13:22, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know:
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:57, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 14 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article United States lightship LV-117, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that seven men died when United States lightship LV-117 (pictured), the Nantucket lightship, was rammed and sunk on 14 May 1934 by RMS Olympic, sister ship of the lost RMS Titanic? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/United States lightship LV-117.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 16:03, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 15 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article A Night to Remember (book), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Walter Lord's 1955 book A Night to Remember has been described as a "defining moment" in the creation of the myth of the RMS Titanic? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/A Night to Remember (book).You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 00:03, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your efforts on the Sinking of the RMS Titanic article; it's a pleasure to read. It's not often we get such a massive article featured, and it's just unspeakably wonderful when we do. Thank you. ceran thor 04:26, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 15 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Titanic Memorial, Belfast, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Titanic Memorial in Belfast (pictured) depicts a personification of Death holding a wreath above the head of a drowned sailor who is borne above the waves by mermaids? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Titanic Memorial, Belfast.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady ( talk) 08:03, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 15 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Animals aboard the RMS Titanic, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that 100 English foxhounds narrowly avoided being among the animals aboard the RMS Titanic during her disastrous maiden voyage? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Animals aboard the RMS Titanic.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady ( talk) 08:03, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 15 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article RMS Titanic in popular culture, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that commemorations of the RMS Titanic in popular culture have included songs, poems, plays, musicals, films, books and even black teddy bears? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/RMS Titanic in popular culture.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady ( talk) 08:04, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
My apologies for changing the class from B to List for Lifeboats of the RMS Titanic. I know you are a hardworker on that; sometimes, I see things differently, such as List of Sailor Moon characters. To make up my misconceptions, I am proposing a merger of the below orchestra members into Orchestra of the RMS Titanic:
What do you say? -- George Ho ( talk) 11:55, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
I have created
Musicians of the RMS Titanic. Also, I have created a proposal in
WP:Proposed mergers. --
George Ho (
talk)
18:37, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 15 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Saved from the Titanic, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Saved from the Titanic, starring Titanic survivor Dorothy Gibson (shown in poster), was the first film made about the sinking of the Titanic and was released only 29 days after the disaster? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Saved from the Titanic.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 16:03, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 15 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Titanic Belfast, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the new Titanic Belfast visitor attraction tells the story of the ill-fated RMS Titanic through interactive videos, audio, replicas and displays? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Titanic Belfast.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 16:06, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 15 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article White Swan Hotel, Alnwick, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a sample of the First Class experience aboard the RMS Titanic and Olympic can be found at the White Swan Hotel in Alnwick? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 16:07, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
WikiProject Ships Barnstar | |
Thank you for the barnstar. Soerfm ( talk) 22:05, 15 April 2012 (UTC) |
![]() | On 16 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Masabumi Hosono, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the only Japanese passenger aboard the Titanic survived, but was then shunned as a coward in his home country for not going down with the ship? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Masabumi Hosono.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 00:03, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
I noticed the flurry of Titanic-related articles at DYK for this weekend. I'd intended to finish off two I was working on, but missed the boat, so to speak... (yeah, terrible pun). I'd still like to nominate them for DYK, but as you (and others) have done such huge amounts of work on the Titanic articles recently, I thought I'd drop off links to the two new articles here first, in the hope that you or others could help polish them up a bit, add stuff I've missed or don't have sources for, that sort of thing (and add in links from the existing Titanic articles, something I never remember to do). The articles are on the two inquiries that took place following the disaster: United States Senate inquiry into the sinking of the RMS Titanic and British Wreck Commissioner's inquiry into the sinking of the RMS Titanic. Possibly some additional redirects are needed as well. Oh, and the trick to make part of the title italics (as in the Sinking of the RMS Titanic article). Talking of which, hope the day on the main page with that article went OK. Carcharoth ( talk) 00:20, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
I have now nominated the two article at DYK, and am starting the rather long task of adding links from existing Titanic articles. I'll also mention the two new articles on the talk pages of the articles on Titanic and its sinking, as that might help bring in other editors as well. I am also going to ask at WT:DYK if there is an outside chance of them being put up this week, to still catch some of the centenary feel (the US inquiry opened on 19 April), but I'm not sure whether that argument will fly for just these two articles.
At the moment, the articles are mostly just basic facts and figures. There is a fair amount of opinion out there about them (in the vast literature about Titanic), but that will take time to add in a way that doesn't unbalance the articles. Also, the French Wikipedia has an article that combines the two topics. I only became aware of that after doing the two separately. Some articles refer to "the inquiries" (plural) and it is hard to link at that point, so maybe a brief overview page might help - it could include some of the less well known inquiries or hearings, such as something called the limitations of liabilities hearings, and something even more obscure, called the 'Second Bulkhead Committee' (established by the Board of Trade), and chaired by Archibald Denny, the same guy who unveiled one of the memorials (the Southampton one to the engineers, I think). Carcharoth ( talk) 21:28, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Update: I added you to the British inquiry DYK nomination here. Do you want to suggest an alternate hook there? QPQs are done, just waiting for someone to pick up the review. I did post to WT:DYK, but I think the moment may have passed, so may have to wait a while in the queue. Carcharoth ( talk) 06:33, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Briefly following up on a side-matter here. I had seen references to that play you mentioned, and had notes on it in my draft article, but it didn't make it into the version I saved (it should have done). An external link and something based on that Guardian article you mentioned would go nicely in the article. Do you have a link to the article if it is online? Never been to Northern Ireland, but I did consider asking someone to ask if pictures were possible for the article, unlikely but you never know. Can't remember how long it runs for. If there is independent coverage of the TV drama that was broadcast by BBC Northern Ireland (the one that included Paul McGann), that could be worth mentioning (currently only an external link). I did vaguely notice some other dramatisations done on the inquiry over the years (BBC radio, I think?), so a small section on all this might even be possible. Not sure how stable the article needs to be for DYK though. Carcharoth ( talk) 23:31, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for working to clarify the username policy. As changes here may affect the work performed by administrators working to review UAA I have asked for their input so we may see some other suggestions on the policy talkpage. Regards, 7 23:34, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I was looking through new pages for Mother's Day DYK hooks. I presume that's the intention of Leontina Albina Espinoza? If so, well done sir. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja
I've responded to your concerns for the Bat'leth DYK. I'm not sure a rewrite is nessecary as I've virtually removed the unencyclopedic canon section (which also included the stuff that was similar to the other page) and it is now (just) over the limit so it doesn't really need expansion. The C of E. God Save The Queen! ( talk) 11:14, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
You seem like you need one for all you've been through.
Bearian (
talk)
23:49, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
I've nominated Mothers and Other Liars. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 00:06, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! I hope I'm not intruding, I've just been wondering about a stance I've heard regarding the page, namely that it is a synthesis. I read the first citation, and though much of it seemed pertinent, let me focus on one part.
"Language both reflected socialist isolation and promoted socialist consciousness. For example, it was an important factor in distinguishing supporters of the German social democracy from other Germans. Four particular words - vorwärts, Arbeiter, Genosse, and frei - took on distinctive connotations that made them special if not exclusive property of the social-democratic movement in the years before the first world war. Vorwärts simply means "forward", but as a name for a journal or an organization such as a singing club, it was generally applied only to socialist undertakings."
(I bolded what I felt to be a pertinent section) I read that and I said okay, what is in the article seems sourced, but will it survive a notability challenge? The source refers to a limited time frame and limited geographical scope, should that factor in to its use as a citation, etc. What I've found (besides two clashing ideologies which both have seemed to decide that 'socialist' can only be a pejorative as opposed to something that has historical meaning) is that many people continue to argue synthesis. I can't edit there at the moment, but I wanted to ask something of you as you seemed experienced with the AFD process (by the way I found your argument pointing out the other AFD's closure, maintaining the knowledge for use in other articles, to be incredibly compelling).
Had you read the section I quoted above? If so is there a way I'm interpreting original research that misses some subtlety? I'm thinking I may return to the discussion since I was vocal to begin with and I might as well advance the conversation for my part, but in doing so I want my contribution to be as informed and reasoned as is possible. Thank you for your time! 68.229.93.129 ( talk) 01:34, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Please let other editors hammer out the details of the ban. Nobody Ent 17:33, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Does this work for you? (Please focus only on the wording and make no statements about the other editor). Nobody Ent 17:44, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Can you agree to this?
The community is imposing a binding interaction ban on Delicious Carbuncle and Prioryman. Each will not comment on, or otherwise interact with the other at any venue on Wikipedia. Reporting or otherwise mentioning the other editor is not permitted on Wikipedia. If either editor wishes to report a suspected violation of the interaction ban or has a question regarding the ban they will email any administrator of their choice. Per policy, appeals to the ban may be made to Arbcom.
-- Avanu ( talk) 19:58, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
The article
Black Stone you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Black Stone for comments about the article. Well done! There is a backlog of articles waiting for review, why not help out and
review a nominated article yourself?
GoP
T
C
N
08:45, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 13 May 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Human–animal breastfeeding, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that human–animal breastfeeding – women breastfeeding young animals, or animals breastfeeding human children, such as goats (pictured) – has been practised throughout history? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady ( talk) 08:02, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 13 May 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Leontina Albina Espinoza, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Leontina Albina Espinoza of Colina, Chile, claimed to have given birth to 58 children and was cited for a time by the Guinness Book of Records as the world's most prolific mother? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Leontina Albina Espinoza.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 16:06, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for catching that, it was completely unintentional. SwisterTwister talk 01:04, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, I was on a break. Can't advise you anyway, I don't get involved in that. Dougweller ( talk) 14:27, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Pont Flavien at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Zanhe (
talk)
21:29, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 21 May 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pont Flavien, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Pont Flavien (pictured) in southern France is the only bridge with an arch over each end to have survived from the time of the Roman emperor Augustus? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pont Flavien.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Carabinieri ( talk) 08:02, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Please don't re-add that inappropriate summary. NE should be trouted or worse for that sweeping attack. You and Dan both mean well here. Br'er Rabbit ( talk) 19:22, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
I wanted to let you know that after both hooks on the investigations were put into Prep 3, one after the other, Carabinieri subsequently merged them into a single hook. If you have a problem with this, or with the resulting double hook, you'll need to say something very soon. There's a discussion section in WT:DYK about it. BlueMoonset ( talk) 02:47, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 24 May 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article British Wreck Commissioner's inquiry into the sinking of the RMS Titanic, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the British inquiry into the sinking of the RMS Titanic was criticised as a "whitewash" after Lord Mersey (pictured) found that the disaster had not been caused by negligence? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/British Wreck Commissioner's inquiry into the sinking of the RMS Titanic.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 08:03, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 24 May 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article United States Senate inquiry into the sinking of the RMS Titanic, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the United States Senate inquiry into the sinking of the RMS Titanic declared the disaster an " act of God" because nobody could be held liable for it under maritime law? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/United States Senate inquiry into the sinking of the RMS Titanic.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 16:04, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Just checking on the page views for those two Titanic DYKs, and the British inquiry (in the lead position with an image) got over 9000, while the US inquiry (in the second position in its set) got just under 5000. Nothing to match the 28,000 of Wreck of the RMS Titanic from March, but still not too bad compared to the other Titanic DYKs I found on DYKSTATS. Do you know where that listing of Titanic articles by page views that you compiled is? Carcharoth ( talk) 07:27, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Prioryman, I've passed Bare-faced Messiah as a good article, good work on that. I've been working on William S. Sadler for a while, you might find that article interesting--there are some parallels between him and Hubbard. (Notable difference too, not the least of which is that Sadler was a psychiatrist.) Martin Gardner wrote one of the books I'm using for a source on Sadler, so it was interesting to see his name pop up in the review. Alright, BTW, I'll try to review your Iceland museum article, that looks quite interesting. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:56, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
For your terrific work on Street House Anglo-Saxon cemetery and in general on wikipedia. Thankyou! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:40, 30 May 2012 (UTC) |
Thought you might want to expand Taxatio Ecclesiastica.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:54, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Resolved by motion that:
The restriction imposed on Prioryman ( talk · contribs) by Remedy 11.6 of the Climate change case (" ChrisO topic-banned") is hereby lifted.
For the Arbitration Committee,
Lord Roem (
talk)
17:52, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
I mentioned you here. Cla68 ( talk) 00:25, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Resolved by motion that:
The restriction imposed on Prioryman ( talk · contribs) by Remedy 17 of the Scientology case (" ChrisO restricted") is hereby lifted.
For the Arbitration Committee, Lord Roem ( talk) 02:41, 1 June 2012 (UTC)