Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barney Cheng, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:38, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to post them at User talk:Vice regent. VR talk 00:34, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Love at first sight, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Drmies (
talk)
00:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, but "His motivation is not supported by a verification of the actual content he's removing" doesn't make any sense. Motivations aren't usually supported, and the content I removed precisely lacked secondary verification. If you don't understand that content in Wikipedia needs secondary sourcing AND needs to be relevant, then please re-read our guidelines. Plus, the whole thing is ridiculous. Imagine adding a list to Beer of all the people in literature or the media or politics or whatever who drank a beer. Drmies ( talk) 00:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
this isn't just unsourced, it's not even mentioned in the article which is almost worse. You are clearly capable of sourcing but you seem to have ignored your discussion with User:Drmies - this doesn't bode well for you. Doug Weller talk 13:27, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
RegentsPark. I noticed that you made a comment on the page
Talk:Yamnaya culture that didn't seem very
civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
RegentsPark (
comment)
12:42, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of gay characters in anime, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Donghua.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:10, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of animated series with LGBTQ characters: 2015–2019, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Donghua.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:21, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
In the course of the 2021 Gaza War, Gendelman drew attention from several news outlets, such as Sky News, Reuters, Haaretz, the BBC and the New York Times, for using his Twitter account to spread disinformation about the actions of Palestinian militants. On May 11, Gendelman published an Arabic-language post accusing Hamas of attacking Israel from residential areas in the Gaza Strip, using as proof a video that depicts the launch of numerous rockets on a street surrounded by buildings. The video, however, was found by other posters and media fact-checkers to have been filmed in 2018 at the latest in either Syria or Libya, having therefore no links with the unfolding conflict. Dozens of people corrected Gendelman's post in the replies, but he only deleted it after it had been tagged "media manipulation" by the Twitter administration.
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rafael Silva (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madam Secretary.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
nableezy - 00:50, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia does not cite itself. I do not speak German, and I don't think the readers of the English encyclopedia understand German, so quoting another citation that is written in German is harder to verify. Among Us for POTUS ( talk) 21:17, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Libs of TikTok, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC10.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 19:48, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
-- Kyohyi ( talk) 13:01, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi there Peleio, sorry to intrude like this. I tend to think Korny and I would agree on roughly nothing, but your tiff with them is becoming uncomfortably personal. I understand the aggravation, but I think it would be for everyone's best if you could try to stick closer to content complaints. I would appreciate it, anyway, though that may not change your opinion at all. Whatever you decide, all the best, and happy editing. Cheers. Dumuzid ( talk) 20:29, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elon Musk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antifa.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
You need to read wp:bludgeon. Slatersteven ( talk) 17:04, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
You may be interested to know that I have added some notes to the article on the sexuality of Frederick the Great. Kunst-Theodor ( talk) 17:21, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
PerryPerryD
Talk To Me
17:57, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 05:42, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Libs of TikTok, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hill.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:06, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
I believe you violated the current 1RR rule on the Libs of TikTok article with these two edits. One of them has already been reverted, so I think you're obligated to self-revert the other one. Korny O'Near ( talk) 14:12, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi PA. Please use edit summaries, especially when reverting other editors (except in cases of vandalism). If your recent LoTT revert was meant to signal frustration, trust me I share it. Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 02:08, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
I have reverted your edit to Aaron Yan. Yan does not state that he is gay in the reference you have given, as you claim. The reference itself is comes from ''Mirror Media'' which is a gossip mag. A full year later, Yan was asked directly if he was gay, and would neither confirm or deny that he is. Is he gay? Maybe. Probably. But, until he himself openly states it, then we're not in the business of outing people based on celebrity gossip. ExRat ( talk) 22:56, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Taiwanese gay musicians indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 03:35, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
Nemov ( talk) 01:00, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
It seems like your Misinformation in the Israel–Hamas war contributions aren't accurately summarizing what the sources say. It wasn't Channel 4 who concluded that recording was an "obvious fabrication", it was Hamas - that's what your source says explicitly.
In your other edit, your summary seems to imply that IDF claimed the detainees were all Hamas soldiers, when actually they were all civilians. Both seem to misrepresent what the sources say. For starters, neither source mentions any claims by the IDF. One mentions a claim by "Israel" about them being suspects, the other mentions a suggestion by "Israeli media" that they were soldiers. The sources also claim that "several" detainees, not all of them, were identified as civilians.
There should also be more attribution about where some of these claims are coming from, e.g. The Guardian mentions a Hamas spokesperson behind the UN school claim, rather than just reporting them uncritically as if they were established facts. XDanielx ( talk) 17:57, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Content, not contributor. If you continue with the personalized commentary you will be topic banned. If you believe there is a behavioral issue being it to AE or ANI. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 21:34, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Click here to add a new enforcement requestlink at AE it will give you a template you can fill out. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 22:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello. You have made several reversions to Misinformation in the Israel–Hamas war within the last hour. Per WP:ArbCom and WP:PIA, editors are only allowed to make a single reversion to any article related to the Israel-Palestine conflict within a 24-hour window. Your first edit on the article today was a direct reversion of XDanielx. Any subsequent reversions following that edit should be self-reverted. A very quick check confirmed this edit was a violation of the WP:1RR rule, as it reverted this addition. Please make all the necessary self-reversions, otherwise, you may be reported. The Weather Event Writer ( Talk Page) 21:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Peleio Aquiles. Thank you. — xDanielx T/ C\ R 01:20, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
You have put your response in the wrong place put it in the section "Statement by Peleio Aquiles" Selfstudier ( talk) 00:26, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
The following topic ban now applies to you:
You are indefinitely topic banned from the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed.
You have been sanctioned per consensus of administrators at this arbitration enforcement thread.
This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please read WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with the topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period to enforce the ban.
If you wish to appeal the ban, please read the appeals process. You are free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 14:59, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
ScottishFinnishRadish (
talk)
14:00, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barney Cheng, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:38, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to post them at User talk:Vice regent. VR talk 00:34, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Love at first sight, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Drmies (
talk)
00:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, but "His motivation is not supported by a verification of the actual content he's removing" doesn't make any sense. Motivations aren't usually supported, and the content I removed precisely lacked secondary verification. If you don't understand that content in Wikipedia needs secondary sourcing AND needs to be relevant, then please re-read our guidelines. Plus, the whole thing is ridiculous. Imagine adding a list to Beer of all the people in literature or the media or politics or whatever who drank a beer. Drmies ( talk) 00:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
this isn't just unsourced, it's not even mentioned in the article which is almost worse. You are clearly capable of sourcing but you seem to have ignored your discussion with User:Drmies - this doesn't bode well for you. Doug Weller talk 13:27, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
RegentsPark. I noticed that you made a comment on the page
Talk:Yamnaya culture that didn't seem very
civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
RegentsPark (
comment)
12:42, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of gay characters in anime, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Donghua.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:10, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of animated series with LGBTQ characters: 2015–2019, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Donghua.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:21, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
In the course of the 2021 Gaza War, Gendelman drew attention from several news outlets, such as Sky News, Reuters, Haaretz, the BBC and the New York Times, for using his Twitter account to spread disinformation about the actions of Palestinian militants. On May 11, Gendelman published an Arabic-language post accusing Hamas of attacking Israel from residential areas in the Gaza Strip, using as proof a video that depicts the launch of numerous rockets on a street surrounded by buildings. The video, however, was found by other posters and media fact-checkers to have been filmed in 2018 at the latest in either Syria or Libya, having therefore no links with the unfolding conflict. Dozens of people corrected Gendelman's post in the replies, but he only deleted it after it had been tagged "media manipulation" by the Twitter administration.
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rafael Silva (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madam Secretary.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
nableezy - 00:50, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia does not cite itself. I do not speak German, and I don't think the readers of the English encyclopedia understand German, so quoting another citation that is written in German is harder to verify. Among Us for POTUS ( talk) 21:17, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Libs of TikTok, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC10.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 19:48, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
-- Kyohyi ( talk) 13:01, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi there Peleio, sorry to intrude like this. I tend to think Korny and I would agree on roughly nothing, but your tiff with them is becoming uncomfortably personal. I understand the aggravation, but I think it would be for everyone's best if you could try to stick closer to content complaints. I would appreciate it, anyway, though that may not change your opinion at all. Whatever you decide, all the best, and happy editing. Cheers. Dumuzid ( talk) 20:29, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elon Musk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antifa.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
You need to read wp:bludgeon. Slatersteven ( talk) 17:04, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
You may be interested to know that I have added some notes to the article on the sexuality of Frederick the Great. Kunst-Theodor ( talk) 17:21, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
PerryPerryD
Talk To Me
17:57, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 05:42, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Libs of TikTok, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hill.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:06, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
I believe you violated the current 1RR rule on the Libs of TikTok article with these two edits. One of them has already been reverted, so I think you're obligated to self-revert the other one. Korny O'Near ( talk) 14:12, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi PA. Please use edit summaries, especially when reverting other editors (except in cases of vandalism). If your recent LoTT revert was meant to signal frustration, trust me I share it. Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 02:08, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
I have reverted your edit to Aaron Yan. Yan does not state that he is gay in the reference you have given, as you claim. The reference itself is comes from ''Mirror Media'' which is a gossip mag. A full year later, Yan was asked directly if he was gay, and would neither confirm or deny that he is. Is he gay? Maybe. Probably. But, until he himself openly states it, then we're not in the business of outing people based on celebrity gossip. ExRat ( talk) 22:56, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Taiwanese gay musicians indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 03:35, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
Nemov ( talk) 01:00, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
It seems like your Misinformation in the Israel–Hamas war contributions aren't accurately summarizing what the sources say. It wasn't Channel 4 who concluded that recording was an "obvious fabrication", it was Hamas - that's what your source says explicitly.
In your other edit, your summary seems to imply that IDF claimed the detainees were all Hamas soldiers, when actually they were all civilians. Both seem to misrepresent what the sources say. For starters, neither source mentions any claims by the IDF. One mentions a claim by "Israel" about them being suspects, the other mentions a suggestion by "Israeli media" that they were soldiers. The sources also claim that "several" detainees, not all of them, were identified as civilians.
There should also be more attribution about where some of these claims are coming from, e.g. The Guardian mentions a Hamas spokesperson behind the UN school claim, rather than just reporting them uncritically as if they were established facts. XDanielx ( talk) 17:57, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Content, not contributor. If you continue with the personalized commentary you will be topic banned. If you believe there is a behavioral issue being it to AE or ANI. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 21:34, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Click here to add a new enforcement requestlink at AE it will give you a template you can fill out. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 22:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello. You have made several reversions to Misinformation in the Israel–Hamas war within the last hour. Per WP:ArbCom and WP:PIA, editors are only allowed to make a single reversion to any article related to the Israel-Palestine conflict within a 24-hour window. Your first edit on the article today was a direct reversion of XDanielx. Any subsequent reversions following that edit should be self-reverted. A very quick check confirmed this edit was a violation of the WP:1RR rule, as it reverted this addition. Please make all the necessary self-reversions, otherwise, you may be reported. The Weather Event Writer ( Talk Page) 21:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Peleio Aquiles. Thank you. — xDanielx T/ C\ R 01:20, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
You have put your response in the wrong place put it in the section "Statement by Peleio Aquiles" Selfstudier ( talk) 00:26, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
The following topic ban now applies to you:
You are indefinitely topic banned from the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed.
You have been sanctioned per consensus of administrators at this arbitration enforcement thread.
This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please read WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with the topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period to enforce the ban.
If you wish to appeal the ban, please read the appeals process. You are free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 14:59, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
ScottishFinnishRadish (
talk)
14:00, 13 July 2024 (UTC)