Feel free to leave a message
Welcome to
Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent
genre changes, such as the one you made to
Sight of You, have conflicted with our
neutral point of view and
verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide
reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek
consensus for certain edits. Thank you.
Tbhotch.
™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it!
See terms and conditions.
19:35, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello there
I would like you to take a moment to reflect on your edits. At present you are being disruptive. You added information to Julie Carp claiming that she was leaving in 2013. You failed to cite a source, so I am well within my rights to issue a warning template. However TW is not working and I am having to explain instead. Next time you should cite a source. But from the stories I read there was no maternity leave mentioned and that means there has been some guess work. I'd also like to point out that you changed a value on Paul Lambert's article changing Johnny as Paul's husband instead of civil partner. It was a civil partnership.. Rain the 1 00:35, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello i would first off like to apologize for this i did not intend to cause any distribution firstly with the Julie Carp incident i assumed that as the actress confirmed pregnancy and has a family she would go on maternity and secondly regarding the Paul Lambert incident in multiple soap civil partnerships have been listed at 'husbands' so i apologize but was just following these other soap -- Onlythetruthisappropriate ( talk) 01:16, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Onlythetruthisappropriate! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Talk That Talk, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Rain
the 1
21:37, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Chris Brown discography, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. —
Oz
(talk)
22:32, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:39, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or
synthesis into articles, as you did at
Ren Harvieu, you may be
blocked from editing.
Rain
the 1
23:08, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Labrinth with
this edit, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
—Entropy (
T/
C)
23:18, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
You will not be getting an apology from me because you added information without a source. I was correct to issue a warning because it is certainly not the first time. You have four warnings then a block may be issued if the problems persist. I just noticed that you blanked a valid warning... Here are a few things you can do to limit disruption:
If you can demonstrate this rather than ignore the valid warnings you have earned so far - you'll progress and improve. Which is all anyone wants. Thank you. Rain the 1 23:24, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
When adding information use a citation - there is a list of citation layouts available at WP:CT. You have to include a source otherwise you are breaking the projects WP:OR policy. Here is a quick example - You can copy this citation and fill out the fields replacing the "value" with the relevant information. The work is field is the work cited - e.g. "Digital Spy, The Official Charts Company, The Daily Mail, Billboard, The Australian"... the publisher field is the name of the publisher "Hearst Magazines UK, Associated Newspapers, Northern & Shell, Newsquest"... the access date is todays date, the date is the date provided on the source/article, the first and last field is for the article author's first and last names and the URL is self-explanatory. Rain the 1 23:36, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
<ref>{{cite web|last=Value|first=Value|title=Value|url=Value|work=Value|publisher=Value|accessdate=Value|date=Value}}</ref>
Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an
edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks!
Tonywalton
Talk
00:01, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Zymurgy. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made to
Lana Del Rey, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks,
Zymurgy (
talk)
01:01, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Tulisa Contostavlos with
this edit. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Zymurgy (
talk)
01:19, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to
Tulisa Contostavlos with
this edit, you may be
blocked from editing.
Zymurgy (
talk)
01:22, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Tyger Drew-Honey with
this edit, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Mediran (
t •
c)
01:32, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at
Unorthodox Jukebox, you may be
blocked from editing. Thank you.
Dan56 (
talk)
18:38, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did to
Beyoncé Knowles discography, without
verifying it by citing
reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —
Oz
22:01, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Yes, but it had been tagged for improvement (not by me) for a long time. I hope to finish updating it today and then you can comment on the finished product. It is an uphill struggle trying to streamline it whilst trying not to undo all the hard work that has been done by others. Deb ( talk) 14:08, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012 in British music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MDNA ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:27, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at
Nobody's Perfect (Jessie J song), you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. 01:31, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Jennifer Lopez, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
TBr
and
ley (
what's up)
21:19, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Toddst1 (
talk)
06:16, 31 January 2013 (UTC) Please stop. Wikipedia is
not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to
List of Hollyoaks characters, will be regarded as
vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Rain
the 1
01:19, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from changing
genres, as you did to
What You've Done to Me, without providing a
source and without establishing a
consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own
point of view are considered
disruptive. Thank you.
0z (
talk)
03:23, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Bo Bruce. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been
reverted or removed.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges.
Whilst I do appreciate the work of all editors on Wikipedia, I have been forced to revert your edits to three articles (
Bo Bruce,
Before I Sleep (album) and
Bo Bruce discography) yet again. As has been stated in other warnings on your talk page above, please do not remove properly sourced material from articles as you did here.
The midweek chart position of the album has never been referred to as anything but this and the midweeks are valid chart within the UK, operated by The Official Charts Company, so I'm unsure why you believe, as you stated in your most recent edit summary, that the "midweek does not count". I also know of no Wikipedia rules which support your reasoning for deleting this information.
In addition to this, the first time you chose to delete properly sourced material from these three articles on Wikipedia you also failed to include any edit summaries, which I notice you have been warned for previously. In regards to your most recent set of edits, I do not believe the fact that the edit "made the article look neater" to be a suitable reason to delete sourced information from any article.
If you would like to dispute this please find Wikipedia rules which support your decision to remove the material and please do so on talk pages, rather than continuously removing information from articles which is well within Wikipedia's rules and guidelines as this is disruptive to other editors.
Thank you for your time. Gracec250 ( talk) 21:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Katy Perry discography, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. —
Status (
talk ·
contribs)
02:00, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi, please be careful when moving pages around. You moved Walks like Rihanna to another title and then back to Walks likeRihanna which means I had to ask an administrator to move it back to the correct title. Please do not use the move function unless you know what you're doing. Regards, -- Snow Blizzard 13:52, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Closer to the Truth (Cher album), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ⁓
Hello
71
02:01, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Everybody Hurts may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 01:33, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Roaring 20s (album) may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 13:11, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Feel free to leave a message
Welcome to
Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent
genre changes, such as the one you made to
Sight of You, have conflicted with our
neutral point of view and
verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide
reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek
consensus for certain edits. Thank you.
Tbhotch.
™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it!
See terms and conditions.
19:35, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello there
I would like you to take a moment to reflect on your edits. At present you are being disruptive. You added information to Julie Carp claiming that she was leaving in 2013. You failed to cite a source, so I am well within my rights to issue a warning template. However TW is not working and I am having to explain instead. Next time you should cite a source. But from the stories I read there was no maternity leave mentioned and that means there has been some guess work. I'd also like to point out that you changed a value on Paul Lambert's article changing Johnny as Paul's husband instead of civil partner. It was a civil partnership.. Rain the 1 00:35, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello i would first off like to apologize for this i did not intend to cause any distribution firstly with the Julie Carp incident i assumed that as the actress confirmed pregnancy and has a family she would go on maternity and secondly regarding the Paul Lambert incident in multiple soap civil partnerships have been listed at 'husbands' so i apologize but was just following these other soap -- Onlythetruthisappropriate ( talk) 01:16, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Onlythetruthisappropriate! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Talk That Talk, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Rain
the 1
21:37, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Chris Brown discography, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. —
Oz
(talk)
22:32, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:39, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or
synthesis into articles, as you did at
Ren Harvieu, you may be
blocked from editing.
Rain
the 1
23:08, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Labrinth with
this edit, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
—Entropy (
T/
C)
23:18, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
You will not be getting an apology from me because you added information without a source. I was correct to issue a warning because it is certainly not the first time. You have four warnings then a block may be issued if the problems persist. I just noticed that you blanked a valid warning... Here are a few things you can do to limit disruption:
If you can demonstrate this rather than ignore the valid warnings you have earned so far - you'll progress and improve. Which is all anyone wants. Thank you. Rain the 1 23:24, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
When adding information use a citation - there is a list of citation layouts available at WP:CT. You have to include a source otherwise you are breaking the projects WP:OR policy. Here is a quick example - You can copy this citation and fill out the fields replacing the "value" with the relevant information. The work is field is the work cited - e.g. "Digital Spy, The Official Charts Company, The Daily Mail, Billboard, The Australian"... the publisher field is the name of the publisher "Hearst Magazines UK, Associated Newspapers, Northern & Shell, Newsquest"... the access date is todays date, the date is the date provided on the source/article, the first and last field is for the article author's first and last names and the URL is self-explanatory. Rain the 1 23:36, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
<ref>{{cite web|last=Value|first=Value|title=Value|url=Value|work=Value|publisher=Value|accessdate=Value|date=Value}}</ref>
Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an
edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks!
Tonywalton
Talk
00:01, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Zymurgy. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made to
Lana Del Rey, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks,
Zymurgy (
talk)
01:01, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Tulisa Contostavlos with
this edit. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Zymurgy (
talk)
01:19, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to
Tulisa Contostavlos with
this edit, you may be
blocked from editing.
Zymurgy (
talk)
01:22, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Tyger Drew-Honey with
this edit, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Mediran (
t •
c)
01:32, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at
Unorthodox Jukebox, you may be
blocked from editing. Thank you.
Dan56 (
talk)
18:38, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did to
Beyoncé Knowles discography, without
verifying it by citing
reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —
Oz
22:01, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Yes, but it had been tagged for improvement (not by me) for a long time. I hope to finish updating it today and then you can comment on the finished product. It is an uphill struggle trying to streamline it whilst trying not to undo all the hard work that has been done by others. Deb ( talk) 14:08, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012 in British music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MDNA ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:27, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at
Nobody's Perfect (Jessie J song), you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. 01:31, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Jennifer Lopez, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
TBr
and
ley (
what's up)
21:19, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Toddst1 (
talk)
06:16, 31 January 2013 (UTC) Please stop. Wikipedia is
not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to
List of Hollyoaks characters, will be regarded as
vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Rain
the 1
01:19, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from changing
genres, as you did to
What You've Done to Me, without providing a
source and without establishing a
consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own
point of view are considered
disruptive. Thank you.
0z (
talk)
03:23, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Bo Bruce. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been
reverted or removed.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges.
Whilst I do appreciate the work of all editors on Wikipedia, I have been forced to revert your edits to three articles (
Bo Bruce,
Before I Sleep (album) and
Bo Bruce discography) yet again. As has been stated in other warnings on your talk page above, please do not remove properly sourced material from articles as you did here.
The midweek chart position of the album has never been referred to as anything but this and the midweeks are valid chart within the UK, operated by The Official Charts Company, so I'm unsure why you believe, as you stated in your most recent edit summary, that the "midweek does not count". I also know of no Wikipedia rules which support your reasoning for deleting this information.
In addition to this, the first time you chose to delete properly sourced material from these three articles on Wikipedia you also failed to include any edit summaries, which I notice you have been warned for previously. In regards to your most recent set of edits, I do not believe the fact that the edit "made the article look neater" to be a suitable reason to delete sourced information from any article.
If you would like to dispute this please find Wikipedia rules which support your decision to remove the material and please do so on talk pages, rather than continuously removing information from articles which is well within Wikipedia's rules and guidelines as this is disruptive to other editors.
Thank you for your time. Gracec250 ( talk) 21:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Katy Perry discography, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. —
Status (
talk ·
contribs)
02:00, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi, please be careful when moving pages around. You moved Walks like Rihanna to another title and then back to Walks likeRihanna which means I had to ask an administrator to move it back to the correct title. Please do not use the move function unless you know what you're doing. Regards, -- Snow Blizzard 13:52, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Closer to the Truth (Cher album), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ⁓
Hello
71
02:01, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Everybody Hurts may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 01:33, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Roaring 20s (album) may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 13:11, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)