This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 90 | ← | Archive 95 | Archive 96 | Archive 97 | Archive 98 | Archive 99 | Archive 100 |
Archive 85: December 2021
See my latest edits and new league link, lot of updates needed 93.140.228.133 ( talk) 13:39, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:LionelRoyce.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:23, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
A Certain Scientific Railgun (2009 TV series) is not the name for the series that covers season 1 only, that is why I am using the A Certain Scientific Railgun (season 1). How do you propose getting that latter name if that name already existed and can't be used? Centcom08 ( talk) 01:16, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Not that I care much, but I at least want to make my argument:
-- MichaelFrey ( talk) 19:28, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Why Did you redirect the article for too soon 98.186.54.177 ( talk) 20:07, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Why Didn't You Answer me for. 98.186.54.177 ( talk) 21:19, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Welcome back to NPP | |
you can come and play with us if you get stressed! JW 1961 Talk 16:04, 8 December 2021 (UTC) |
Hello! Why did you revert my edits? How can these movies be not notable? They are as notable as for example all Godzilla movies. Ultra Series is one of the most popular and one of the biggest franchises in Japan. Japanese versions of these pages cite numerous mentions of these movies in notable sources. If there's a rule these articles broke, please cite it exactly. For example, if a page doesn't cite enough sources, it's not because it's not notable, but because people didn't paste them. -- Дейноніх ( talk) 12:09, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Please nominate for deletion rather than having the embarrassing tag at the top of the article! Those tags do damage. That tag is your opinion only. Notability needs discussion, and I see you did not care to use the talk page. -- SergeWoodzing ( talk) 15:17, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Sir, I saw you are the last editor of the Article. May i expand that article. This is well known Municipal Corporation in Bihar i think it should be expanded. Please help. Thank you. Bihariboy Rahul ( talk) 06:50, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=BMW_2_Series_(G42)&diff=1059926288&oldid=1059908896 This page is supposed to be the individual page of the model. And I removed the detailed information of the new model in the model series article to better fit the other models in that article. This is a recent model and needs to have it's own article in order to be more consistent with the previous model. Please explain why you turned it into a redirect to the model range article and what "covered in target" means if you want to improve this article go ahead but someone has to make a standalone article to fit more information. Speedyboi69 ( talk) 18:22, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi , you recently changed the name of the page maharaja ishwari prasad narayan singh to ishwari prasad nrayan singh. please explain Gaurav 3894 ( talk) 05:16, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
My apologies if you're the wrong person to request this, but your name was the last person who edited the piece before it was deleted. The feature was deleted for reasons, as you wrote, for not enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to pass the GNG. There were also issues with how the summary biography was written. I feel as if I can fix the piece by reworking the summary section, and providing more independent sources to prove that the piece has notoriety. In general, I think the fictional character is the biggest icon from a very popular video game, and I do believe the character deserves their own page. I think the deletion was a little bit hasty. Thanks for the time reading this. Transformers03( talk) 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Im 애국심 존중. I have a Questions. I was from korean Wikipedia. And, Im korean. So, I can't Understand many Things in English Wikipedia. In Eternatus, It was REDIRECT. But, I was thought I need to make new pages for Eternatus. In korean Wikipedia, Many people is deleting Redirect page. Thank you. ( It is different) 애국심 존중 ( talk) 09:10, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Was it really not worth it? Ugo1970 ( talk) 17:19, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I'm elemimele, the person who was daft enough to translate the German version of
Gasolin AG. You've quite rightly noticed that the article is a bit thin on references. This is partly because I was relying on translation, and of course standards of referencing vary. You've used the general tag rather than tagging any specific bits, but were there any sections/statements that leapt out at you as particular offenders? If so, let me know, and I'll see if Google can turn up anything.
As background, I speak reasonable German but I'm not an expert on the petrol industry; the article arose because English WP decided to delete its article on Bruno Bergner on grounds there was only one really good secondary source for his work. Had Gasolin AG existed at the time, it would have been a perfect merge-target for Bergner, his notability stemming from a very long-term output of widely-known work for Gasolin. Since it didn't, I decided to translate it! Poor old Bruno got rather neglected in the process, and I'd like to add a picture of two of his, and maybe a brief statement of his background based on the one source we have (obviously I mustn't overdo it, he's only one person in Gasolin's history, albeit their public face).
Elemimele (
talk)
18:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
I have noticed that the page for ocean engineering continues to be redirected to marine engineering's page due to a "forking" issue, under the supposition that the articles cover the same (or indistinguishably similar) topic matter. Although the difference between ocean engineering and marine engineering is admittedly not well-known to the general public, I believe I can provide some clarification that justifies ocean engineering having its own article – both as an ocean engineer with graduate and undergraduate degrees in the subject and as a colleague of marine engineers with whom I have worked closely. More importantly, my colleagues and I have some great supporting information and sources to share with the world to educate them about what ocean engineers do!
The difference between naval architecture, marine engineering, and ocean engineering is actually quite simple: naval architecture deals with the design of ships and submarines; marine engineering deals with the design and integration of shipboard systems (e.g. propulsion, electronics, mechanical equipment); and ocean engineering deals with the design of other ocean systems not directly related to ships and submarines. Ocean engineering is mostly focused on structures (e.g. offshore platforms, coastal structures, port and harbor design), but underwater life support systems and wave power also fall within our education and training (and not naval architects or marine engineers), so I plan to include sections for those on the ocean engineering page. You can see my most recent edits of ocean engineering for a few sources that provide a good distinction between these topics.
As previously mentioned, the difference I just described is not well-known outside of industry and academia, so I understand why some people may be eager to group everything under a single topic (i.e. “marine engineering”). To satisfy this predilection, I could try to overlook the inconsistency in nomenclature and add my contributions to the marine engineering page, but the fact is that ocean engineering as it is taught and practiced today simply does not belong there. There are accredited ocean engineering programs at several institutions across multiple countries, as well as a number of journals, conferences, and companies dedicated to ocean engineering (also in my most recent edit). These things alone would probably justify ocean engineering having its own article, but I wanted to paint the whole picture.
I don’t want to go longer than I already have, but suffice it to say that there is a lot of helpful information specific to ocean engineering that the world would benefit from knowing here on Wikipedia. We have experts from industry and academia who are ready to contribute sources and information toward this effort. The result will be an extensive, well-cited, and well-connected article on ocean engineering. (I also plan to bring the marine engineering page up to speed, since it is a bit lacking in citations right now.) Thanks for your help! Oceaneng21 ( talk) 16:49, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello Why should Hossein Mohammadi Vahidi's article be deleted so quickly? I think this article has a criterion of recognition. If you do a little research on graphic designers, you will see that he is active and has attended many event Jackpet11 ( talk) 14:39, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
This is unfair. I ask you to help me keep this article. Jackpet11 ( talk) 14:47, 18 December 2021 (UTC) Can I draft the article? I do not want to be deleted again Jackpet11 ( talk) 15:19, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Yes this is better. I do not know why this article should be deleted but other articles like this should stay Jackpet11 ( talk) 15:23, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Ummm why isn’t the backlog still ballooning every day? I asked myself. Then I saw you’d come back, so mystery solved. Very decent of you not to come back for the notability drive so I could earn a bit of virtual silverware during your absence - I could never keep up with you in a normal month, let alone a backlog drive. Welcome back. Mccapra ( talk) 16:47, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Why have you moved three football articles into draftspace?
Each of the articles have citations from reliable, independent sources and meet notability requirements per WP:FOOTY. Mooretwin ( talk) 23:15, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Holiday cheer | ||
Here is a snowman a gift a boar's head and something blue for your listening pleasure. Enjoy and have a wonderful 2022. MarnetteD| Talk 02:45, 19 December 2021 (UTC) |
Hey, I noticed you reviewed a few Turkish village stubs including Kadıköy, Baskil, Düğüntepe, Baskil and Doğancık, Baskil. Lugnuts' geostubs have been discussed multiple times [1] [2] [3] with consensus that anything sourced only to Koyumuz should be redirected to the district. These particular ones might be a grey area since they have a second source and I don't want to pull you into that debate, but at the very least Koyumuz should probably be tagged as Better Source Needed. – dlthewave ☎ 12:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi, you marked List of book publishing houses in India as reviewed. But should this article be on the mainspace. I don't think so. I would have moved it directly to draft space, but thought to ask you first. What is your opinion? ― Itcouldbepossible Talk 14:18, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
if the group or set is notable, the individual items in the list do not need to be independently notable, but it is also stated that
editors may, at their discretion, choose to limit large lists by only including entries for independently notable items or those with Wikipedia articles. So, it is rather tough to decide. But lets just wait. I am leaving a message to the user who created the page.
Hello, Onel5969! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year!
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T)
09:39, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Why did you give no reason for deleting the wiki page for Alexander Kluge's Die Macht Der Gefuhle. Many of his other films have pages and the information on there was of note for film fans. Now when I click the page link it just goes to Kluge's own wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liveartlegend ( talk • contribs) 11:56, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
To: Onel5969 ... thank you for your industrious year on New Page Patrol! Spread the Merry! WikiGnomes 4ever!!!
From: WhiteguruMany thanks; same to you! Giant Snowman 12:34, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice. Thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Polyamorph ( talk) 17:47, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, JW 1961 Talk 11:46, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, John B123 ( talk) 15:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Merry Christmas Onel5969 | |
Hi Onel5969, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas Share similar holiday wishes by adding {{
subst:User:Davey2010/MerryChristmas}} to your friends' talk pages.
|
I have a question. I recently started this article on a Canadian abstract artist. An editor put an Orphan tag on it. I deleted the tag because the individual has so-many categories and he`s a well-known abstract artist. Now I`m wondering if I did the right thing. Can you advise? Thanks, Joan arden murray ( talk) 18:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Dear friend: I was touched by your message and deeply grateful to you for all your help. Wikipedia is a great force for the good and like all the editors, I am glad to add my contribution! Merriest! Joan arden murray (talk) 11:20, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
★Trekker (
talk) is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{ subst:Xmas5}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Onel5969,
First, thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia. I'm concerned about how quickly a page I created, Peraton, was marked for speedy deletion by you, simply because you found a website (theladders.com) that had the exact same content. I have since proven that theladders.com copies Wikipedia articles for nearly all of their company entries, you can see for yourself, but the real concern is that this shows a lack of investigative effort and I don't think articles should be speedily-deleted like this, I mean there are many sites that scrape Wikipedia and copy off of it, so just because the content of a relatively new article is found somewhere else word-for-word, doesn't mean it was a plagiarized Wikipedia article. I think that in these types of situations, there's nothing wrong with marking a page as to be considered for deletion, but it should only be after looking deeper into the issue. In this situation it was deleted less than an hour after marked which left no time for me to defend it, and that doesn't seem right. Anyway, hopefully it won't happen again and Peraton can get restored. Supremedemency ( talk) 23:13, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2022!! | |
Hello Onel5969, warm wishes to you and your family throughout the holiday season. May your heart and home be filled with all of the joys the festive season brings. Here is a toast to a Merry Christmas and prosperous New Year!. scope_creep Talk 01:10, 24 December 2021 (UTC) |
Dear One15969: I think I understand about Orphan now. Thank you for saving Blake Fitzgerald! You know what? This is a real Christmas present! Joan arden murray ( talk) 12:32, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
https://www.oricon.co.jp/prof/297008/products/521166/1/ https://www.billboard-japan.com/goods/detail/274107 https://music.apple.com/gb/album/viva-rock-ep/1537386692 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cluT6HNO1bI — Preceding unsigned comment added by NickWX28 ( talk • contribs) 20:21, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, looks like you reviewed the page for the music album Muh Dikhai and removed all contents entirely? It is now redirecting to the album artiste Shafqat Amanat Ali's page which I don't think it should? Could you please undo this and restore the original Muh Dikhai album page? Or, please let me know what your concerns are with the original page (notability or otherwise) so I can attempt to address them. Thank you for your time. Priyanka2330 ( talk) 20:40, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Foot Clan Piñata Farms — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4455:1A9:E100:D4C6:BEAD:DCA0:C710 ( talk) 07:26, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you reverted my recent changes and additions to the articles Scouting in Puerto Rico and Guajataka Scout Reservation. I currently working to expand specifically the content around GSR and I would like to understand your reasoning in doing so.
HI, this is a different article from Zembîlfiroş, this article about grave and location this grave but Zembîlfiroş article speak about the person how he was live , I hope you understand what I mean and do not merge this article with Zembîlfiroş, Thank you Hamaredha ( talk) 16:47, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969 Merry Christmas, Could you please review it Draft:Dhadkan Zindaggi Kii. What's more changes required in it. Thanks, eargerly wait for your response. -- C1K98V ( 💬 ✒️ 📂) 05:17, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I don't understand on the basis of which parameters the page Motettu de tristura was brought to the draft. The information is coherent and the piece is part of a very specific cultural tradition. After all, I think it is equivalent, for example, with the song The Bitter Withy which has been part of wikipedia for several years. Waiting for some explanation, thanks Fpittui ( talk) 07:28, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969 Merry Christmas. It is not exactly clear why you have placed the article Tamaš Hryb to draft category - it is well-referenced and complete. Could you please clarify? Seems to be a mistake-- Czalex 11:13, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Merry Christimas! I wish you much health and peace. I would also like to wish you an excellent 2022. Best regards. ✍A.WagnerC ( talk) 14:29, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
I have had to decline your speedy deletion nomination of Viy Cortez. Unfortunately, the creator of the article requested and obtained speedy deletion, thus leading to closure of the deletion discussion without its reaching a conclusion, and then re-created the article. That has the unfortunate effect of making a G4 deletion impossible. I suggest taking it back to AfD. Naturally I hope this was not deliberate gaming of the system. JBW ( talk) 21:23, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
I noticed you reviewed The United States of Anxiety, but I'm not totally sure what that means. I think I've seen mentions of this specific review process, but it appears to be largely done in the background. Would you mind pointing me to the relevant pages discussing the process? I don't remember what it's called exactly. TipsyElephant ( talk) 21:36, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello! I am seeing that you reviewed the page Jonathan Trichter and turned it into a redirect. I understand that Trichter was not elected to the office he ran for, but I believe the article is important enough because it is the only time in modern history to my knowledge that a Wilson Pakula was used. This fact alone got the article on the front page of Wikipedia in September 2021. I realize now that I never actually mentioned the Wilson Pakula in the article, and if you would be willing to reconsider your decision, I would write the Wilson Pakula aspect of Trichter's candidacy into the article. Thank you! Capisred ( talk) 17:35, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
Is it notable yet? Skyerise ( talk) 16:16, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
I would point out I have seen articles on writers with far less biographical information, so not sure the "not in depth enough" point is valid. Ummunmutamnag ( talk) 21:25, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Onel5969,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (
talk)
15:24, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Onel5969,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
John B123 (
talk)
17:17, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Hey One5969, I reviewed your speedy deletion request for Ryan Persaud, and the previous AFD request. It looks like the new authors of the page substantially expanded the article and added a great deal more references, so I think this one needs to go back to AfD to be deleted again.
Let me know if you have any questions! Prodego talk 21:03, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive | |
January 2022 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.
Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. |
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 90 | ← | Archive 95 | Archive 96 | Archive 97 | Archive 98 | Archive 99 | Archive 100 |
Archive 85: December 2021
See my latest edits and new league link, lot of updates needed 93.140.228.133 ( talk) 13:39, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:LionelRoyce.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:23, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
A Certain Scientific Railgun (2009 TV series) is not the name for the series that covers season 1 only, that is why I am using the A Certain Scientific Railgun (season 1). How do you propose getting that latter name if that name already existed and can't be used? Centcom08 ( talk) 01:16, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Not that I care much, but I at least want to make my argument:
-- MichaelFrey ( talk) 19:28, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Why Did you redirect the article for too soon 98.186.54.177 ( talk) 20:07, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Why Didn't You Answer me for. 98.186.54.177 ( talk) 21:19, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Welcome back to NPP | |
you can come and play with us if you get stressed! JW 1961 Talk 16:04, 8 December 2021 (UTC) |
Hello! Why did you revert my edits? How can these movies be not notable? They are as notable as for example all Godzilla movies. Ultra Series is one of the most popular and one of the biggest franchises in Japan. Japanese versions of these pages cite numerous mentions of these movies in notable sources. If there's a rule these articles broke, please cite it exactly. For example, if a page doesn't cite enough sources, it's not because it's not notable, but because people didn't paste them. -- Дейноніх ( talk) 12:09, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Please nominate for deletion rather than having the embarrassing tag at the top of the article! Those tags do damage. That tag is your opinion only. Notability needs discussion, and I see you did not care to use the talk page. -- SergeWoodzing ( talk) 15:17, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Sir, I saw you are the last editor of the Article. May i expand that article. This is well known Municipal Corporation in Bihar i think it should be expanded. Please help. Thank you. Bihariboy Rahul ( talk) 06:50, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=BMW_2_Series_(G42)&diff=1059926288&oldid=1059908896 This page is supposed to be the individual page of the model. And I removed the detailed information of the new model in the model series article to better fit the other models in that article. This is a recent model and needs to have it's own article in order to be more consistent with the previous model. Please explain why you turned it into a redirect to the model range article and what "covered in target" means if you want to improve this article go ahead but someone has to make a standalone article to fit more information. Speedyboi69 ( talk) 18:22, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi , you recently changed the name of the page maharaja ishwari prasad narayan singh to ishwari prasad nrayan singh. please explain Gaurav 3894 ( talk) 05:16, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
My apologies if you're the wrong person to request this, but your name was the last person who edited the piece before it was deleted. The feature was deleted for reasons, as you wrote, for not enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to pass the GNG. There were also issues with how the summary biography was written. I feel as if I can fix the piece by reworking the summary section, and providing more independent sources to prove that the piece has notoriety. In general, I think the fictional character is the biggest icon from a very popular video game, and I do believe the character deserves their own page. I think the deletion was a little bit hasty. Thanks for the time reading this. Transformers03( talk) 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Im 애국심 존중. I have a Questions. I was from korean Wikipedia. And, Im korean. So, I can't Understand many Things in English Wikipedia. In Eternatus, It was REDIRECT. But, I was thought I need to make new pages for Eternatus. In korean Wikipedia, Many people is deleting Redirect page. Thank you. ( It is different) 애국심 존중 ( talk) 09:10, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Was it really not worth it? Ugo1970 ( talk) 17:19, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I'm elemimele, the person who was daft enough to translate the German version of
Gasolin AG. You've quite rightly noticed that the article is a bit thin on references. This is partly because I was relying on translation, and of course standards of referencing vary. You've used the general tag rather than tagging any specific bits, but were there any sections/statements that leapt out at you as particular offenders? If so, let me know, and I'll see if Google can turn up anything.
As background, I speak reasonable German but I'm not an expert on the petrol industry; the article arose because English WP decided to delete its article on Bruno Bergner on grounds there was only one really good secondary source for his work. Had Gasolin AG existed at the time, it would have been a perfect merge-target for Bergner, his notability stemming from a very long-term output of widely-known work for Gasolin. Since it didn't, I decided to translate it! Poor old Bruno got rather neglected in the process, and I'd like to add a picture of two of his, and maybe a brief statement of his background based on the one source we have (obviously I mustn't overdo it, he's only one person in Gasolin's history, albeit their public face).
Elemimele (
talk)
18:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
I have noticed that the page for ocean engineering continues to be redirected to marine engineering's page due to a "forking" issue, under the supposition that the articles cover the same (or indistinguishably similar) topic matter. Although the difference between ocean engineering and marine engineering is admittedly not well-known to the general public, I believe I can provide some clarification that justifies ocean engineering having its own article – both as an ocean engineer with graduate and undergraduate degrees in the subject and as a colleague of marine engineers with whom I have worked closely. More importantly, my colleagues and I have some great supporting information and sources to share with the world to educate them about what ocean engineers do!
The difference between naval architecture, marine engineering, and ocean engineering is actually quite simple: naval architecture deals with the design of ships and submarines; marine engineering deals with the design and integration of shipboard systems (e.g. propulsion, electronics, mechanical equipment); and ocean engineering deals with the design of other ocean systems not directly related to ships and submarines. Ocean engineering is mostly focused on structures (e.g. offshore platforms, coastal structures, port and harbor design), but underwater life support systems and wave power also fall within our education and training (and not naval architects or marine engineers), so I plan to include sections for those on the ocean engineering page. You can see my most recent edits of ocean engineering for a few sources that provide a good distinction between these topics.
As previously mentioned, the difference I just described is not well-known outside of industry and academia, so I understand why some people may be eager to group everything under a single topic (i.e. “marine engineering”). To satisfy this predilection, I could try to overlook the inconsistency in nomenclature and add my contributions to the marine engineering page, but the fact is that ocean engineering as it is taught and practiced today simply does not belong there. There are accredited ocean engineering programs at several institutions across multiple countries, as well as a number of journals, conferences, and companies dedicated to ocean engineering (also in my most recent edit). These things alone would probably justify ocean engineering having its own article, but I wanted to paint the whole picture.
I don’t want to go longer than I already have, but suffice it to say that there is a lot of helpful information specific to ocean engineering that the world would benefit from knowing here on Wikipedia. We have experts from industry and academia who are ready to contribute sources and information toward this effort. The result will be an extensive, well-cited, and well-connected article on ocean engineering. (I also plan to bring the marine engineering page up to speed, since it is a bit lacking in citations right now.) Thanks for your help! Oceaneng21 ( talk) 16:49, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello Why should Hossein Mohammadi Vahidi's article be deleted so quickly? I think this article has a criterion of recognition. If you do a little research on graphic designers, you will see that he is active and has attended many event Jackpet11 ( talk) 14:39, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
This is unfair. I ask you to help me keep this article. Jackpet11 ( talk) 14:47, 18 December 2021 (UTC) Can I draft the article? I do not want to be deleted again Jackpet11 ( talk) 15:19, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Yes this is better. I do not know why this article should be deleted but other articles like this should stay Jackpet11 ( talk) 15:23, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Ummm why isn’t the backlog still ballooning every day? I asked myself. Then I saw you’d come back, so mystery solved. Very decent of you not to come back for the notability drive so I could earn a bit of virtual silverware during your absence - I could never keep up with you in a normal month, let alone a backlog drive. Welcome back. Mccapra ( talk) 16:47, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Why have you moved three football articles into draftspace?
Each of the articles have citations from reliable, independent sources and meet notability requirements per WP:FOOTY. Mooretwin ( talk) 23:15, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Holiday cheer | ||
Here is a snowman a gift a boar's head and something blue for your listening pleasure. Enjoy and have a wonderful 2022. MarnetteD| Talk 02:45, 19 December 2021 (UTC) |
Hey, I noticed you reviewed a few Turkish village stubs including Kadıköy, Baskil, Düğüntepe, Baskil and Doğancık, Baskil. Lugnuts' geostubs have been discussed multiple times [1] [2] [3] with consensus that anything sourced only to Koyumuz should be redirected to the district. These particular ones might be a grey area since they have a second source and I don't want to pull you into that debate, but at the very least Koyumuz should probably be tagged as Better Source Needed. – dlthewave ☎ 12:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi, you marked List of book publishing houses in India as reviewed. But should this article be on the mainspace. I don't think so. I would have moved it directly to draft space, but thought to ask you first. What is your opinion? ― Itcouldbepossible Talk 14:18, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
if the group or set is notable, the individual items in the list do not need to be independently notable, but it is also stated that
editors may, at their discretion, choose to limit large lists by only including entries for independently notable items or those with Wikipedia articles. So, it is rather tough to decide. But lets just wait. I am leaving a message to the user who created the page.
Hello, Onel5969! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year!
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T)
09:39, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Why did you give no reason for deleting the wiki page for Alexander Kluge's Die Macht Der Gefuhle. Many of his other films have pages and the information on there was of note for film fans. Now when I click the page link it just goes to Kluge's own wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liveartlegend ( talk • contribs) 11:56, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
To: Onel5969 ... thank you for your industrious year on New Page Patrol! Spread the Merry! WikiGnomes 4ever!!!
From: WhiteguruMany thanks; same to you! Giant Snowman 12:34, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice. Thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Polyamorph ( talk) 17:47, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, JW 1961 Talk 11:46, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, John B123 ( talk) 15:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Merry Christmas Onel5969 | |
Hi Onel5969, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas Share similar holiday wishes by adding {{
subst:User:Davey2010/MerryChristmas}} to your friends' talk pages.
|
I have a question. I recently started this article on a Canadian abstract artist. An editor put an Orphan tag on it. I deleted the tag because the individual has so-many categories and he`s a well-known abstract artist. Now I`m wondering if I did the right thing. Can you advise? Thanks, Joan arden murray ( talk) 18:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Dear friend: I was touched by your message and deeply grateful to you for all your help. Wikipedia is a great force for the good and like all the editors, I am glad to add my contribution! Merriest! Joan arden murray (talk) 11:20, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
★Trekker (
talk) is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{ subst:Xmas5}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Onel5969,
First, thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia. I'm concerned about how quickly a page I created, Peraton, was marked for speedy deletion by you, simply because you found a website (theladders.com) that had the exact same content. I have since proven that theladders.com copies Wikipedia articles for nearly all of their company entries, you can see for yourself, but the real concern is that this shows a lack of investigative effort and I don't think articles should be speedily-deleted like this, I mean there are many sites that scrape Wikipedia and copy off of it, so just because the content of a relatively new article is found somewhere else word-for-word, doesn't mean it was a plagiarized Wikipedia article. I think that in these types of situations, there's nothing wrong with marking a page as to be considered for deletion, but it should only be after looking deeper into the issue. In this situation it was deleted less than an hour after marked which left no time for me to defend it, and that doesn't seem right. Anyway, hopefully it won't happen again and Peraton can get restored. Supremedemency ( talk) 23:13, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2022!! | |
Hello Onel5969, warm wishes to you and your family throughout the holiday season. May your heart and home be filled with all of the joys the festive season brings. Here is a toast to a Merry Christmas and prosperous New Year!. scope_creep Talk 01:10, 24 December 2021 (UTC) |
Dear One15969: I think I understand about Orphan now. Thank you for saving Blake Fitzgerald! You know what? This is a real Christmas present! Joan arden murray ( talk) 12:32, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
https://www.oricon.co.jp/prof/297008/products/521166/1/ https://www.billboard-japan.com/goods/detail/274107 https://music.apple.com/gb/album/viva-rock-ep/1537386692 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cluT6HNO1bI — Preceding unsigned comment added by NickWX28 ( talk • contribs) 20:21, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, looks like you reviewed the page for the music album Muh Dikhai and removed all contents entirely? It is now redirecting to the album artiste Shafqat Amanat Ali's page which I don't think it should? Could you please undo this and restore the original Muh Dikhai album page? Or, please let me know what your concerns are with the original page (notability or otherwise) so I can attempt to address them. Thank you for your time. Priyanka2330 ( talk) 20:40, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Foot Clan Piñata Farms — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4455:1A9:E100:D4C6:BEAD:DCA0:C710 ( talk) 07:26, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you reverted my recent changes and additions to the articles Scouting in Puerto Rico and Guajataka Scout Reservation. I currently working to expand specifically the content around GSR and I would like to understand your reasoning in doing so.
HI, this is a different article from Zembîlfiroş, this article about grave and location this grave but Zembîlfiroş article speak about the person how he was live , I hope you understand what I mean and do not merge this article with Zembîlfiroş, Thank you Hamaredha ( talk) 16:47, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969 Merry Christmas, Could you please review it Draft:Dhadkan Zindaggi Kii. What's more changes required in it. Thanks, eargerly wait for your response. -- C1K98V ( 💬 ✒️ 📂) 05:17, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I don't understand on the basis of which parameters the page Motettu de tristura was brought to the draft. The information is coherent and the piece is part of a very specific cultural tradition. After all, I think it is equivalent, for example, with the song The Bitter Withy which has been part of wikipedia for several years. Waiting for some explanation, thanks Fpittui ( talk) 07:28, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969 Merry Christmas. It is not exactly clear why you have placed the article Tamaš Hryb to draft category - it is well-referenced and complete. Could you please clarify? Seems to be a mistake-- Czalex 11:13, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Merry Christimas! I wish you much health and peace. I would also like to wish you an excellent 2022. Best regards. ✍A.WagnerC ( talk) 14:29, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
I have had to decline your speedy deletion nomination of Viy Cortez. Unfortunately, the creator of the article requested and obtained speedy deletion, thus leading to closure of the deletion discussion without its reaching a conclusion, and then re-created the article. That has the unfortunate effect of making a G4 deletion impossible. I suggest taking it back to AfD. Naturally I hope this was not deliberate gaming of the system. JBW ( talk) 21:23, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
I noticed you reviewed The United States of Anxiety, but I'm not totally sure what that means. I think I've seen mentions of this specific review process, but it appears to be largely done in the background. Would you mind pointing me to the relevant pages discussing the process? I don't remember what it's called exactly. TipsyElephant ( talk) 21:36, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello! I am seeing that you reviewed the page Jonathan Trichter and turned it into a redirect. I understand that Trichter was not elected to the office he ran for, but I believe the article is important enough because it is the only time in modern history to my knowledge that a Wilson Pakula was used. This fact alone got the article on the front page of Wikipedia in September 2021. I realize now that I never actually mentioned the Wilson Pakula in the article, and if you would be willing to reconsider your decision, I would write the Wilson Pakula aspect of Trichter's candidacy into the article. Thank you! Capisred ( talk) 17:35, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
Is it notable yet? Skyerise ( talk) 16:16, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
I would point out I have seen articles on writers with far less biographical information, so not sure the "not in depth enough" point is valid. Ummunmutamnag ( talk) 21:25, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Onel5969,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (
talk)
15:24, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Onel5969,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
John B123 (
talk)
17:17, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Hey One5969, I reviewed your speedy deletion request for Ryan Persaud, and the previous AFD request. It looks like the new authors of the page substantially expanded the article and added a great deal more references, so I think this one needs to go back to AfD to be deleted again.
Let me know if you have any questions! Prodego talk 21:03, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive | |
January 2022 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.
Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. |
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).