![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 |
Archive 17: April 2015
Hello . Thanks for your review of my submission of article : Yasmina My username is Yasmina Fan I don't know how to make the citation in English if the source website is completely in Arabic , can you explain a way to do that ? Also I tried to write in a neutral tone and avoid all peacock terms. Almost every sentence I wrote is referenced , so the opinion is not mine, its from the reference website. So I don't really understand where is the error in my writing tone. Please explain and I will fix. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yasmina Fan ( talk • contribs) 21:54, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
NeoLife1958 ( talk) 02:47, 1 April 2015 (UTC) My page is /info/en/?search=Draft:Arthur_Furst. I don't understand what changes have to be made. I cited sources. I am making this wiki page on behalf of my company, GNLD International and most of the info is from a site we made for Arthur Furst: http://www.gnldcontent.com/ArthurFurst/index.html NeoLife1958 ( talk) 02:47, 1 April 2015 (UTC)NeoLife1958
Hi, just wondering what more I should do with Draft:Tricot (band). As far as I can tell the article satisfies criteria 1, 2 and 4 of the notability guidelines. Could you explain why it doesn't satisfy any of these? Pwrong ( talk) 02:53, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969. I reviewed this article: /info/en/?search=Draft:Disinfect_(band). Should show the validity of the sources.
Hi Onel5969. It helped me out, thanks for that. I still have problems with the validity of the sources. In this case I listed renown sources in several languages, still the referencing seems to be an issue. I thought Magazines do count as 3rd party sources.
Bichetteln ( talk) 14:56, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello,
i added new documents on the page : one on ( Reference ) , one "offical website" on (External links) and sources from Wikipedia on (See also )
am i on the good way ??????
Bichetteln ( talk) 14:56, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi there,
Just noticed you reverted an edit of mine on a list of learning management systems. What are the parameters for adding new LMS's? The one I added seemed to fit in well and I was going to add more before I noticed your edit.
Warm regards, Jimmy
JMelons ( talk) 15:06, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969,
A couple months ago you declined my article for "JAM Paper & Envelope". I'm wondering, was it close to being accepted? I thought I referenced a good amount of legitimate sources. Is there a certain type of source I would need that would push my article to be accepted? Do I need a company profile from a big news source?
Thanks, Vargarnar ( talk) 16:09, 1 April 2015 (UTC)Vargarnar
Dear onel5969, we got your message and we edited the page so it can meet the requirements of wikipedia. We are actually trying to translate the Italian page http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamponatura already available in wikipedia, since there's no wiki page for this masonry type. Moreover I would like to underline that the Italian page has no reference, whereas we referred to european standards and a european approved project. Please, let us know if it is still not worth to be accepted.
Best regards.
Dept. of civil engineering of the university of Padova — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dicea.unipd ( talk • contribs) 16:26, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
I'd like to ask for advice on how to formalize the tone of the article.
Hi Onel5969, would you please let me know how to formalize the tone of the article so that it is in line with Wikipedia's standards? I'm also having a little trouble figuring out which details are worthy of the article (such as the show that he produces and which comedy publications have written about him). I think he's definitely notable enough for inclusion based on other comedians who have Wikipedia entries. Thank you.
Davidwrubin ( talk) 16:52, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I am AnkaIva
/info/en/?search=Draft:Bjorn_Gunnar_Lefnaer
I understand that more reliable sources are needed. We found two articles about Mr.Lefnaer. Both in foreign magazines. One in French and another in German. One talks about his hobby as an avid luxury cars collector. Another is talking about him running his multimilloan euro company.
but We only have hard copies, no electronic links to it. If I make a reference to both magazines, names and dates of publication but without an electronic links, would they be accepted by Wiki editors?
Thanks so much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ankaiva ( talk • contribs) 17:10, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Onel5969,
First, thank you for reviewing my submission: /info/en/?search=Draft:Mark_Anthony_%28Author/Psychic%29
I was hoping you could point out any examples where the Article (NPOV) could be improved so that I could make the edits required for approval. Thank you, ewaretroy — Preceding unsigned comment added by EwareTroy ( talk • contribs) 21:56, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Onel5969,
Thank you again for the clarification. I will try to clear up the article and resubmit. Your feedback and assistance is appreciated. EwareTroy — Preceding unsigned comment added by EwareTroy ( talk • contribs) 20:21, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi One15969 Thanks for reviewing the Chris King article. you say he is not a notable person. Is this because he doesn't have a college education? He's a serial entrepreneur with quite a large social media following. He's also involved in charitable work. Can you give me a steer to improve the chances of approval. Kind regards
Harold Sloan (
talk)
22:06, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia (7th nomination)... Hafspajen ( talk) 22:25, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for taking the time to review my page.
I'd appreciate some clarity on one aspect of the feedback: 'should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources'
My sources include CNBC, Economic Times and Forbes India, in addition to sites like Afaqs.com and campaignindia.in which are well-known advertising sites in India. Could you explain why these sites are considered less-than-suitable? And what sort of sites should I include instead?
I'm rather new at this, so I really would appreciate your help.
Thothbubble ( talk) 05:26, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
If I had the flair for writing, then there would not have been the need for editors. Your explanation on what needs to be done in order for the draft to be approved is quite unclear for me. Could you please be able to provide a much simpler outline of what exactly are you looking for to approve of the draft. The person is an author of 4 books, that is not just a directory listing, that is considered a reference as per APA and other methodologies. Like the Apple process of app approval, the acceptance or rejections are based on your feelings and perceptions. The links that you have outlined do not explain your perspective and perceptions. So could you please outline what it would require for this article to be approved? There are more links and resources in that article than in many of the approved articles on other similar personalities. I am sure that you are a fair editor that wants to help create history not be selective about who is worthy enough based on your choices. There are so many other individuals that are NON American and do more amazing things but since they are not covered in the media or have links cannot be included. That is totally unfair to the achievements of those individuals. The article in question is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jayant_Varma — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.211.153.60 ( talk) 16:08, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
I think this time the draft has merit and deserves your acceptance. What do you think about it ? Thanks, Iulian Vamanu
Ivamanu ( talk) 16:56, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969,
I was responsible for the addition to the Sacramento Magazines Section of the Sacramento, Ca Wikipedia page. My I inquire as to why you removed this information? It is neither offensive nor inaccurate.
Your feedback is welcome however your edit is unwarrented.
A Big Sacramento Fan!
Dmanis2kool — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmanis2kool ( talk • contribs) 18:08, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
I am not actually asking for a re-review, please read. I have added several references to the bottom of the article. I am not sure where to put them inline as they basically all have the same info. I was wondering if there is a way I could invite others to help finish it?
Other than that I'm really not sure why it would have been declined. She does fit the following criteria: Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart & Has had a record certified gold or higher in at least one country. Her other tours are already posted on their own pages. This one was just announced 3/31/2015, so there won't be a whole lot of articles. However, I have found several. I believe Entertainment Weekly & onlyciara.com would constitute as reputable.
MoJo3161981 ( talk) 19:11, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello, i would like to know how i would make my article more notable, i believe that it is an important article showing notability. she is a person who shows how the justice system is flawed, but i would like your opinion on how i could improve my article. Thank you.
/info/en/?search=Draft:Detention_of_Kam_Brock — Preceding unsigned comment added by Areed06 ( talk • contribs) 19:57, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Hey there. Sorry for the late response, I have been very busy and it easy for me to lose track of things. I greatly appreciate you going through and adding places where I require citation. It was very helpful.
I do have a question though. While I can see some places where the citations need to be found, there are many points you labeled where all I have done is paraphrased the article which is linked within that paragraph, or is linked in a previous/later citation, but not within that exact paragraph. Should I link everything even if it is to the same source? How do I go about doing that without cluttering up my sources?
I know some cases this isn't the issue and I need to go back through my personal list of sites and whatnot, but in other cases it is listed explicitly in one of the two books I am citing, both published by universities, so cited it within the paragraph, not each individual thought that way I would avoid quoting too much.
Thank you again for the time and effort you have put into this. -Sage
[ [1]] — Preceding unsigned comment added by SageheartBK ( talk • contribs) 23:55, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
I took a look at the articles you suggested, and drastically cut the content of the article back to indisputably essential and encylopedic facts. Since venture capital firms are mostly notable for the companies that they have funded - removing the portfolio section is rather like removing the "artists produced" section from a music producers entry or "author's edited" from a publisher entry, but that's just my opinion I guess :)
76.21.41.198 (
talk)
03:31, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello ,
Thanks for your advice ,
so today in "See Also" i added 3 new articles .and i take off ""Linked in "
Waiting for your answer .
Regards
Bichetteln ( talk) 13:47, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
14:56:16, 1 April 2015 review of submission by Bichetteln
Hello ,
Thanks for your advice ,
today in "See Also" i took off "Linked in " and i added 3 articles as you ask ....
Regards
Bichetteln ( talk) 14:07, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you so much for taking the time to review my article and leave notes on what I could do to make it better. This was my first wikipage to create and the advice will help me get this page published. Once again thank you so much and if you have any more advice I would love to recieve some. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrohde13 ( talk • contribs) 14:11, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I have now completely re-jigged the entire article as you suggested. Am I getting there? Even found a ref for the brain abscess story. What's next? Eagerly, Sean M Jones ( talk) 16:48, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
I contancted the person for more details of his early and personal life as you said it was needed and he sent me more info which I included but some of these details are minor and dating from the 1960s or earlier, and therefore they are not independently verifiable with external citations. Nevertheless, since they fit with the rest of the picture I have included them in good faith without attaching any independent citations, adding phrases like "he recounts", "he recalls" and "he remembers". So how to deal with that? The High School has no archives about the tennis team or the philosophy club from the 2000s never mind the 1960s. Should I delete it all again? Thanks for your help with this, I did spend a lot of time looking for citations which don't exist but you said we need details of his early life. Sean M Jones ( talk) 14:04, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
No Hostility,
Can you clarify the standards then? Because the 'Government Technology Magazine' has neither the circulation, Presence, nor the history of Inside Publications nor Sacramento News & Review. What facts do you have to support that either of the magazines do not meet the Wiki Standards?
Any Clarification would be greatly appreciated.
Many Thanks,
Dmanis2kool — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmanis2kool ( talk • contribs) 19:55, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
I had an online chat with the help desk. We discussed the validity of the citations for the entry. I was told they were just lists. They are indeed "lists" of the times, places and events participated in by a notable track athlete. The entry is a factual narrative of the information. These sources are the same sources an author of a NYTimes article on the subject would use to verify one's accomplishments. These are the most credible sources to confirm a track athlete's success. All other information comes from information not on the web which the web help person said was fine to use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trb127 ( talk • contribs) 23:08, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, can you please copyedit Gemini (2002 Tamil film)? It is about to be TFA on 13 April, although nominator Sriram Vikram did not place a TFA request, and he was unhappy with the FAC outcome - passing despite unsatisfactory prose. and he is currently absent from Wiki. Kailash29792 ( talk) 03:07, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
User: Ramanhome Article: /info/en/?search=Draft:Thiru_Narayana_Iyengar
Hi Onel5969
Thanks a lot for your detailed help and guidance. Based on your suggestions, i have changed all the things that you had requested in your previous post as below. Please check the draft and let me know if i can resubmit.
Thanks Raman Ramanhome ( talk)Ramanhome
First, even though the underlying links might be in Tamil, the reference notes themselves need to be in English.
Reply>>> He is Tamil scholar in the pre-internet times. One of the references is in English, rest are in Tamil because articles about him were written in the Tamil vernacular since he is a Tamil scholar.
You misunderstand, Ramanhome, I'm speaking about the citation footnote in the article, not the underlying citation. The underlying citation may be in Tamil, but when you create the footnote, that needs to be in English. To me, it looks like only 3 or 4 sources are referenced.
Reply>>> How many references do you need to accept the article? This cannot be a reason to reject the article.
You need at least 3 solid references to show notability. Then, since this is a biography, you need a fair amount of references to validate the underlying assertions in the article. Most of the Tamil language in the article also needs to go away.
Reply>>> yes i have removed most of the tamil language in the article. Pls check and let me know.
Much better. I think the quotes in the original are okay, but you could (if you wanted to), simply leave the English translations. All the raw links in the article have to go away.
Reply>>> what do you mean by the raw links? pls give an example of a raw link.
A raw link is simply inserting a link to an external source by using a weblink. An example would be in the Literary Work section, Madurai Tamil Sangam is a raw link. Simply put the name of the item, since the link does not have anything to do with the subject of the article, you shouldn't even use it as a reference. If the link showed the subject's relationship to the item, than you should use it as a reference. Your first two references are also raw links. You can find out how to format citations at WP:CIT. And finally, the article has an WP:NPOV issue
Reply>>>Please be specific in places where you do not find no neutrality. Identify those places in the article.
Avoid using peacock or overly positive terms. "detailed work" should simply be work. "well discussed" should simply be discussed. "fully dedicated" should simply be dedicated. Get rid of words like that (other examples: "elaborate", "novel" (as in novel way), "important". Ramanhome (talk)Ramanhome
Hope all this helps. Onel5969 (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
thanks for your help....
Best regards Bichetteln ( talk) 13:50, 4 April 2015 (UTC) |
Hi, I am writing about this:
A Saucerful of Secrets (song): Difference between revisions From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Revision as of 10:42, 4 April 2015 (edit) 87.7.43.20 (talk) ← Previous edit
Latest revision as of 13:55, 4 April 2015 (edit) (undo) Onel5969 (talk | contribs) (Reverted 1 good faith edit by 87.7.43.20 using STiki)
Probably good faith is yours, have you ever listened to ASOS?
In the studio version the low rumbling sound is made by vari speeded timpanies, playing A♯ and C♯, the infamous cymbals* are in the high spectrum they are sounding like pieces of glass§.
"We did the first part starting from the high pitches of the cymbals. We placed a mike right next to the cymbals and we hit them very lightly with wooden hammers. Actually, this creates a sound that is very different from that of the cymbals§." (D. Gilmour talking with D. Frikte in Musician, n. 50, Dec. 1982)
In the live version the bass is playing A♯ and C♯, so is the bass instead of the timpanies. :-)
Hope it could help, take care! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rabarbarum3000 ( talk • contribs) 20:18, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
I won't dispute your judgment there, but perhaps you could have saved both of us a little time by using a more descriptive editsum than "rev incorrect edit". I think that much was self-evident; it was obviously a revert, and reverts are generally used to remove "incorrect edits" of one kind or another. Cheers,― Mandruss ☎ 00:44, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969: Puzzled about your reversion of my addition to < /info/en/?search=Paradise_Valley,_Arizona> earlier today -- not clear how this was a copyright violation since I rephrased the source in my own words. ?? How can I add this historical information without being reverted again? thanks for any help... wcwkS15 — Preceding unsigned comment added by WcwkS15 ( talk • contribs) 02:15, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! -- WcwkS15 ( talk) 17:26, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Is it appropriate to ask you to review a revision for this addition? If so, how's this? (I didn't format the refs yet because I don't know how these would go up on your Talk page). Thanks! WcwkS15 ( talk) 20:36, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
The land that became Paradise Valley was first used by European settlers as a grazing ground for cattle. The name was given in the 1880s by Frank Conkey, Manager of the Rio Verde Canal Company, which surveyed the land to develop it for agricultural purposes.[Will Barnes, Arizona Place Names (University of Arizona Press, 1997), p. 318] Legend has it that he named the area "Paradise Valley" because of the abundance of spring wildflowers and Palo Verde trees.[“About Paradise Valley”, http://www.paradisevalleyliving.com/about/, accessed 4/7/15] Modest homes and small resorts began to be built in the area, which was notable for large lot sizes (1-5 acres).[”Town of Paradise Valley History”, http://www.ci.paradise-valley.az.us/DocumentCenter/Home/View/223, accessed 4/7/15] As development accelerated after World War II, residents began to fear annexation by nearby and expanding Phoenix and Scottsdale, threatening the low density, non-commercial character of the area. To prevent this, a “Citizens Committee for the Incorporation of The Town of Paradise Valley, Arizona” was formed and gathered enough signatures to present a petition for incorporation to the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors. On May 24, 1961, the Board incorporated the Town of Paradise Valley.[”Town of Paradise Valley History”, http://www.ci.paradise-valley.az.us/DocumentCenter/Home/View/223, accessed 4/7/15]
Thanks! I will go ahead and post this. Frank Conkey is specifically cited in the reference given (I have updated it to the newer expanded edition). WcwkS15 ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 17:40, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for the review of the article. I think I have now added enough references from notable sources (news agencies and international conferences) to show the importance of the company. I have also gone to the "live chat" and asked the helpers there. They have told me that the article is now good enough for re-submission. Thanks.
Leashoffreedom ( talk) 10:30, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Am very confused as to what Wikipedia wants as proof that Robert Honablue was employed as a recording engineer for CBS Records (NYC) -as well as what proof Wikipedia needs to show that he engineered albums for them -especially in light of the fact that Wikipedia has these albums posted elsewhere that cleary states him as the Recording Engineer, Mastering Engineer, or both. Robert was employed by CBS Records, Motown Studios, and did in fact run a recording studio with George Benson in the 70's. Tape-Op did a featured story on Robert which ran last year -and is still running. Getting on Wikipedia is really a very, very hard thing for credited people to get on because of the red tape that makes no sense. Please check out your listing of Edgar Winter's White Trash LP and Laura Nyro's Christmas and the Beads of Sweat -and explain to me how Robert is noted on them -yet can't be recognized for such on his own page. And likewise, on his previous school's site (www.THIaudio.org) he has endorsements from the late Dave Brubeck, Dave's oldest son, Darius, and the legendary George Benson. Yet that seems to have no merit with Wikipedia. Just trying to help a retired person who has been in the industry for 48 years to get his props. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Recording1948 ( talk • contribs) 15:24, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
I am really having a difficult time with getting Robert Honablue on your pages. I have researched a lot of your pages of recording artists that are on Wikipedia and found Robert Honablue's name attached to several of their recordings -which is indicated on the pages of Wikipedia. Is this an error by Wikipedia??? And did CBS Records err by noting Robert Honablue on many of their released albums that cite Robert Honablue's name??? Can someone talk to me man-on-man about submissions that are accepted on other Wikipedia pages -but not good enough for Robert to have his own page about such??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Recording1948 ( talk • contribs) 16:04, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Sir, I believe that I have included the references that support this book as being noteworthy and am resubmitting my article for your reveiew, suggestions and more helpful comments. I have contacted the book's author seeking permission to add the book cover image to the commons list so that it can be used for this article. Thanks for helping me with my first book article.
Rich23 (
talk) 17:31, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Rich23 (
talk)
17:31, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Dear Editor,
thanks a lot for your feedback. I have added some new references, as recommended. Please let me know if anything else is needed to complete the article.
Link: /info/en/?search=Draft:Gheorghe_Morosanu
Username: ivamanu
89.135.34.187 ( talk) 17:56, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
I have edited this article and am requesting a re-review in hopes it now meets Wikipedia's guidelines. When you review it again, please let me know if there is any specific part of the article that needs amending and I will change it according to your direction.
Hrosato (
talk) 11:59, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Hrosato (
talk)
11:59, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you!!! Hrosato ( talk) 13:57, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969!
Please let me know why my addition (11:21, 6 April 2015) was reverted.
What was wrong?
85.197.21.89 (
talk)
13:05, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
<ref>
</ref>
tags not allowed?
Because you've been reverted,
this SPI might interest you. Thanks,
Poeticbent
talk
14:54, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
You said that there "is a definite argument to be made that the sources (at least some of them which were affected by the content removal) are not unreliable". Can you please elaborate on which sources you are referring to, and why you say they are reliable - be it here or at the article talk page? If that's the case, I clearly have been operating at a standard which is too high, and there are plenty of articles which will warrant changes to include the lower standard sourcing. Ncmvocalist ( talk) 17:17, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
I have asked a question at teahouse. But I would like to know third person's view-- Cosmic Emperor ( talk) 01:19, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
I am unsure as to why the V-Dem Institute is not worthy of a wikipedia article. I have included references and attached a link to the webpage.
ValeriyaMechkova (
talk)
13:10, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello. I am a total newbie to writing WP articles, though of course I have used the service countless times. Thank you for reviewing my recent submission Charles Ernst Scharlau. When I submitted it, just yesterday, I was under the impression that I would have days, even weeks, before it was reviewed. So unwisely I planned to research how to make certain improvements to it in the interim, rather than waiting to submit. One planned improvement was to change the name of the article from "Charles Ernst Scharlau" to "Charles E. Scharlau". Although the individual's German middle name was indeed Ernst, the anglicised name he actually used is obscure, and all references to him that I've discovered indicate he went by "Charles E. Scharlau". This name change will also fix at least one "red link" on another page without having to edit the other topic.
Can the name of the article still be changed without too much effort? If so, can you point me in the right direction for accomplishing the change?
Again, thank you for your help.
KE5JK ( talk) 13:45, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
You may find the conversations here and also here relevant. I see you declined it for lack of notability as well. Fiddle Faddle 14:56, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969 - thank you for editing my article "BaFa' BaFa' - Cross Cultural/Diversity Simulation" and for the suggestions about releasing the copyright from this article:
http://www.simulationtrainingsystems.com/history-bafa-bafa/. I have followed the instructions about releasing the copyright to Wikipedia and posted the suggested note at the bottom of the article "The text of this webpage “History of BaFa’ BaFa’ – A Cross Cultural / Diversity /Inclusion Simulation” is available for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts)."
As per your suggestion I will resubmit the article. Please let me know if I need to do anything else. Again I appreciate your help. Sincerely Mgshirts Mgshirts ( talk) 19:29, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Mgshirts ( talk) 19:29, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Greetings! I am new to submitting to WikiPedia, and have been trying to get a living person bio published for a man named Jayme Illien, who is the founder of the International Day of Happiness. I am not sure if I have taken the right approach in my previous submissions. For instance, it may be more appropriate as a 'stub' rather than an 'article.' I'm really not sure what method to take in submitting this bio and would really appreciate some help!
As a reference, please visit /info/en/?search=Mark_Williamson. This is about the length (perhaps even shorter) of the article I would like to submit. It does not have any references at all, only one external link (which appears to be broken). If I wanted to publish something like this, simply to give credit where it is due in acknowledging Mr. Illien as the UN adviser who conceived of the IDoH, how should I go about that? Again, any help would be greatly appreciated! Thank you.
EDIT: Sorry, here is the link to the article in question - /info/en/?search=Draft:Jayme_Illien - thanks!
Juniperusco ( talk) 23:30, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi again and thanks for the very fast reply. Can you advise me on how to improve the article so that it achieves the necessary standards?
Provide more references that show the importance of the subject?
ValeriyaMechkova (
talk)
07:37, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
User: Ramanhome Article: /info/en/?search=Draft:Thiru_Narayana_Iyengar
Hi Ramanhome - You still have to remove the raw links. I removed one to give you an example. Also, that paragraph should have a citation which verifies the facts it includes.
The citations themselves are still in Tamil, not English. Again, I'm not talking about the underlying articles, but the footnotes in this article have to be in English.
The Literary work section needs a lot more citations (same reason I just cited above).
But on the whole, MUCH better! Nice job so far. Let me know when you've made the above changes and I'll take another look.
Onel5969
Hi Onel5969
Thanks a lot for your detailed help and guidance. Based on your suggestions, i have changed all the things that you had requested in your previous post as stated above. Please check the draft and let me know if i can resubmit.
Thanks Raman Ramanhome ( talk)Ramanhome — Preceding undated comment added 09:44, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969 -
Thanks for your feedback on the article draft - you noted it was a paraphrasing issue, and I have tried to make changes in line with your suggestions, focusing on the sections for the header and consultancy, which you pointed out were too similar (in a paraphrase sense) to a source article. Would you be able to take a look at the article again? I have redrafted it and was hoping you could take a look so I can resubmit it? Many thanks for your advice and help!
/info/en/?search=Draft:Rebecca_Harding
Ilovetomatoes321 Ilovetomatoes321 ( talk) 10:39, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
I am requesting a re-review by the esteem reviewer(s) because the articles had been improvised based on the reviewers' comments hence it is cited accordingly. Moreover, the nominee had achieve many recognition(citation listed), award(citation listed), publication(references listed), experience in diverse discipline of research(citation listed) and had many pages cited his name in Google search (kindly search "khalisanni") regardless to his young ages. Thus, I would like to thanks the reviewer for his suggestion and hopefully, the article can be accepted as a part of Wikipedia sources. I believe it would helps the users to retrieve the nominee concise information (early life, achievements, etc) with references through esteem Wikipedia page without Googling many website. Thank you
Khalisanni khalid (
talk)
15:57, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your kind assistance.
Some time ago I uploaded Morosanu's picture from his personal webpage http://mathematics.ceu.edu/people/gheorghe-morosanu and put it in the right place. Unfortunately, it was removed after a while for copyright reasons.
The picture is available to the public without any restriction. His institution wanted to have a picture there. There is no copyright issue !!!
Could you please upload it from http://mathematics.ceu.edu/people/gheorghe-morosanu and insert it into his wiki page ?
Thank you, ivamanu — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivamanu ( talk • contribs) 17:04, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Who would have thought that one space could cause such problems? People are having trouble find the page because it is R. T. instead of R.T. Also most people know him as Skip. So I want to change the title to the following: R.T. "Skip" Wallen
I have never changed the title of an existing article so hopefully you can help me with this. cheers, from Down Undah, Reefswaggie ( talk) 01:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
how about this? put in a redirect if someone looks for Skip Wallen ? is that possible? Reefswaggie ( talk) 23:26, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
user name: Yatin Rewale article: /info/en/?search=Draft:Jayantilal_Gada Hello - My Article Draft:Jayantilal Gada has been rejected after review, with the Expert's feedback that This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. The feedback seems very general and I would like to amend and resubmit, but would like more specifics in order to do so.Please tell me what changes i have to do to get this article accepted.Now I added more references about person from news papers and others web cites .I Also improved my Article .Please help me thank you Yatin Rewale ( talk) 10:34, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
I have added best reliable resources to justify my article. Please review my article again and do let me know.
AB (
talk)
12:22, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969 - I sent you the following message on March 16. I see that you have replied to messages before and after my message, but you have not replied to my message. I have copied it below and would greatly appreciate a response since I think that we have established the required notability to publish the article for the reasons explained below. Thank you !
16:53:03, 16 March 2015 review of submission by 24.13.237.93[edit] 24.13.237.93 (talk · contribs) Draft:Kol Hadash Humanistic Congregation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
I don't understand why the submission for Kol Hadash Humanistic Congregation was declined. The congregation is "notable" both as the "oldest and largest Humanistic Jewish congregation in Illinois" and for its rabbi emeritus being "the first Humanistic rabbi in Illinois." There are citations to articles ABOUT the congregation (not just a passing reference) in two different editions of the Chicago Tribune (Jan 13, 2008 and Sept 15, 2014), the Daily Herald (Dec 23, 2009), and WBEZ radio (July 16 2014).
Wikipedia has published articles about other Jewish congregations that have almost no citations or special distinction. See the links below:
1. Congregation Solel in Highland Park, Illinois - This article has almost no references, and none of the three references cited are independent, third-party references like a newspaper. The article was printed asking for additional submissions. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congregation_Solel
2. North Shore Congregation Israel in Glencoe, Illinois – This article has only two references, one of which is just a “dictionary and sourcebook,” and the other is a reference to the synagogue’s building. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Shore_Congregation_Israel
3. Temple Beth El in Madison, Wisconsin – This article has NO citations at all. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_Beth_El_(Madison,_Wisconsin)
4. Temple Beth El in San Antonio, Texas – This article has only one citation, and not for anything that makes them “notable” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_Beth-El_(San_Antonio)
5. Temple Beth El in Great Neck, New York – No citation for anything other than its location. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_Beth-El_(Great_Neck,_New_York)
6. Beth Shalom in Frederick, Maryland – Nothing notable about it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beth_Sholom_Congregation_(Frederick,_Maryland)
I would appreciate any explanation or specific instruction that would enable me to edit the article and have it approved for publication.
Thank you!
24.13.237.93 ( talk) 14:38, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
I appreciate you taking the time to go over the proposed changes to the Mitchell Kriegman. In my draft article, you should know that all of the references are in the References section (Reflist|ref=), I use shortcuts in the body of the article to reduce the clutter and it helps me avoid duplicate references. Kriegman is a nice guy and he has refrained from editing his article for many years, now as a novelist, he'd like to have his film career documented and have an article without banners in the header. Thanks Again! 009o9 ( talk) 20:44, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Wow, a lot of activity on this page. Just wanted to thank you again for agreeing to go over the updates for Mitchell Kriegman. I'll see if I can spend a couple of hours this evening in AfC, maybe find a worthy article that can be helped along. Thanks again! 009o9 ( talk) 02:27, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Dear Editor Onel5969, I appreciate your time and effort in review and acceptance of “Brooks Benedict” biography page as an addition to Wikipedia. Similarly, I am grateful for your kind note, in reference to which, I thought that I had directly submitted the page. Also, I am not very familiar with the rating system. However the page that I submitted contains historical references important to him and the topic. They are not found in any other collective. Please note that all that was known about him as reported in public databases did not surpass 3-4 sentences. Thereby his page at Wikipedia is the most comprehensive, and importantly underlines his education, military service, and challenges in an acting career spanning silent movies to television. In this respect, I would be grateful if you could advise me as to how further improve this page so that it reaches a level higher stub. I understand that stub articles can be deleted. Also, I am curious to see if I am credited with the creation of the page. Respectfully, M. Neshat, Ph.D. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mneshat ( talk • contribs) 23:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
User: Ramanhome Article: /info/en/?search=Draft:Thiru_Narayana_Iyengar
Hi Onel5969
Thanks a lot for all your help. As requested by you, have resubmitted for review.
Regards Raman
Hi Ramanhome - yup, looks good. Resubmit and let me know. Onel5969 (talk) 15:47, 9 April 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramanhome ( talk • contribs)
Hey Onel5969: A few days back I posted a proposed revision as a question for you under "copyvio" reversion of Paradise Valley additions, above -- have not heard back though I see other action on your talk page -- so maybe you didn't see it? If it's appropriate, I'd appreciate your feedback on this proposed revision -- this process occasioned quite a bit more useful research and a much better submission --thanks for that! and hope you agree. WcwkS15 ( talk) 02:11, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
I have noticed that you reverted some valuable edits here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=MIME&diff=637466320&oldid=637421367
Please undo your revert.
Piotr Jurkiewicz ( talk) 02:38, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi
My submission was declined by you " Onel5969". I still got the same message I got earlier on after editing and resubmitting the article.
I want to learn please. What exactly do you want me to do so that the article will be accepted.
Here's the link:
/info/en/?search=Draft:Joshua_Letcher
Thanks
Hilary Umeoka — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hilumeoka2000 ( talk • contribs) 03:20, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for taking the time to review my page ( /info/en/?search=Draft:Alok_Nanda_%26_Company_Communications_Pvt._Ltd.)
I was hoping you could shed some light on your feedback.
'refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources': My sources include CNBC, Forbes India and Economic Times. Since the subject is an Indian advertising firm, I've also included sources like CampaignIndia and Afaqs, that are known and respected by the Indian advertising community. Could you specify why these sources are unacceptable so that I may improve my article?
'This submission appears to read more like an advertisement...articles need to be written from a neutral point of view': I have avoided what might be considered as 'peacock terms'; there are, however a few instances where I've used words taken directly from sources. For instance: 'India is the fastest-growing luxury market' from CNBC.com. Do you object to words/phrases like these or is there something else you'd like me to change?
I'd appreciate your help. Thothbubble ( talk) 07:06, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
As per your suggestion, i have added three more reliable resources to justify my article.
Kindly, review my article again.
AB ( talk) 07:21, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Good Morning:
Your long list of Wikipedia articles is most impressive. And although I am from the deep South, I do like New York. Having been there several times, I enjoyed each visit. Hanging on my wall is a chalk drawing of my daughter and me from a sidewalk artist in Manhattan.
Now, for my article on Von Lombard. My last two rejections were over notability. I truly respect Wikipedia's standing in this regard, yet it does seem there is a great deal of latitude on what an editor determines to be notable.
Please consider:
Von Lombard has written four books. VL has baptized over 1000 people in water. Only one percent of pastors in America have baptized that many people. VL has been published in one magazine and one journal. VL has been on Fox News and had his own TV and radio programs.
There are about a dozen third party references in the article at Von Lombard.
Can you plz reconsider your decision on notability? https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Draft:Von_Lombard&redirect=no
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crimsontidealabama ( talk • contribs) 10:49, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Dear reviewer
Please read the clarifications that I sent regarding the article that you rejected
Thank your very much for your attention
Nolberto Munier
User name: reinumrub Password: Valencor — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.90.148.96 ( talk) 12:43, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello,
re: /info/en/?search=Draft:Ilan_Rechtman
Thank you for your review of the article, I was google-ing information on artists who had played with Brazilian orchestras and decided to make this article. I used the article on Sonia Rubinsky ( /info/en/?search=Sonia_Rubinsky) as a basis for comparison. I have added citations to Mr. Rechtman's recorded work and to the recent broadcast of his music on the US TV Show Dancing with the Stars.
Thank you,
user: AKonanur
Hi, thank you so much for reviewing the Jo Loves draft page. Please could you clarify where you identify peacock terms, is this av example: "The reaction from the industry was instantaneous"? All other sentences are written factually without positive adjectives or superlatives. Is the use of Jo's quotes the reason for decline? Many thanks, would love to make this work.
Teriw ( talk) 06:18, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I want to ask for your advise on article about TV show. I initially write this info to be put on their filmography. However other editors said that we can't put long details about a show on filmography article. There are 2 main reality show and I actually think it will be better if we can combined it in one page instead of two separate articles but I'm not too sure if we can do that here. Here is the draft. Kindly need your advise. Thank you so much :) Sonflower0210 ( talk) 07:00, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi! I know that you do great work in this area. Nevertheless, I'm going to stick my neck out and ask you to be a little more careful in what you accept. Lee Harris Pomeroy was created by an editor called Leeharrispomeroy; that suggests that there is a serious conflict of interest problem there at the very least. WP:COI, WP:AUTO apply; it should probably be speedy-deleted as G11, unambiguous advertising. Conflict-of-interest editors and would-be autobiographers are supposed to be strongly discouraged from editing related articles; one way of discouraging them might be to decline their drafts. Rather more worrying is PREMature (TV Series), where the copyvio blanking was removed by the article creator; just for future reference: that is never acceptable. If should ever happen to see it again, please restore the copyvio template or revert to the last version before it was removed. Many thanks for all you do, best regards, Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 15:06, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Onel5969
I do need your assistance. It may take some of your valuable time, but I really do need your help. You recently rejected my article on the artist Paluzzi. I have personally talked to the curator of a major museum in Los Angeles, who agreed with me that Rinaldo Paluzzi is considered to be a Notable American Abstract Expressionist artist. I do understand the need to establish the Notability of Paluzzi and include references; and I believe I have done so in my article.
But please explain something to me?
Since Paluzzi was an American Abstract Expressionist Artist, I examined the list of artists whose mature work related to the American Abstract Expressionist movement (see: /info/en/?search=Abstract_expressionism) (Note: 7.2 Other artists) and may I suggest my article on Paluzzi includes more information establishing his notability and references than do the articles on the following artists listed there: William Brice , Alexander Bogen (was neither significant nor American), Charles Ragland Bunnell, Edward Corbett, Lynne Mapp Drexler, Jean Dubuffet, Sam Gilliam, Joseph Glasco, JohnD. Graham, Stephen Greene, Gino Hollander, Frances Kornbluth, André Lansky, Michael Lowe, John Levee, Herbert Matter (he was not an Abstract Expressionist, he was a photographer and graphic designer), Seong Moy, Jan Müller, Pat Passlof, Earle M. Pilgraim, Aaron Siskind (a photographer who had little to do with the Abstract Expressionist movement), Ary Stillman, and Cora Kelley Ward. PLEASE look at the WIKIPEDIA articles on each of the above and explain why they have an article and Paluzzi does not?
By the age of 32, his work was already in major collections and being shown in major exhibitions. [1]
Also, may I suggest you look at the following:
http://www.javierbmartin.com/index.php/textos/535-obito-rinaldo-paluzzi
http://www.javierbmartin.com/index.php/pintores-javier-b-martin/222-rinaldo-paluzzi
Please go to: http://www.inwhiteriver.com/attractioncategory/public-art/ Scroll down to “Totem” and read the bio on Paluzzi. If that doesn’t establish his nobility and references more than all the artists listed in section 7.2 of the American Abstract Expressionist article, I don’t understand what will?
After taking the time to do what I have requested, please let me know exactly what needs to be added to my article for it to be included in WIKIPEDIA.
I am age 90.85 and may not live long enough to see my article in WIKIPEDIA.
With cordial regards, SirSwindon
Sirswindon ( talk) 19:31, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Joél Célestin Filsaime, is a well known musician as J-Pimp, with reliable natural resource on his music career. Can you re-review this draft article and accepted this article?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jo%C3%A9l_C%C3%A9lestin_Filsaime
I remind you that the criterion Speedy A7 only applies to people, organizations, organized events, and web content. It does not apply to concepts, or films, or any creative work. I am removing your tags, and I very strongly advise you not to do any further deletion tagging until you have carefully read WP:CSD and WP:Deletion policy. DGG ( talk ) 22:28, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
I just declined three pages you tagged with WP:CSD#A7. Please read the criterion more carefully. Ordinary films are not eligible for A7. Neither is a neologism.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 22:32, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Can you please copy edit this article's plot? I believe it is a bit improper and long. However read it carefully and make sure the plot's basic essence is not lost in translation (i may be junior to you, but call it my desperation.)
Pavanjandhyala (
talk)
05:04, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I've made a request for dispute resolution regarding the Moon Landing article. Just wanted to let you know :) LadyLeitMotif ( talk) 12:43, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
thank you for your help, apologies if i didn't do it correctly. was listening to a 1981 bbc radio doc about the ripper case, and truth be told was trying to 'crowbar' the fact that sutcliffe showed his friend his VD in the men's room. (yuck) the part of the page i was trying to edit said something like 'other analysis showed no proof that he went to prostitutes'. how should i have done it, if at all? thanks again for your help, hope you are well. feel free to delete this after reading/ response. :) Onemorebrando ( talk) 13:21, 12 April 2015 (UTC)chip
Hi,
Could you please tell me what data could help improve the page, will references form the following sites help? In addition to the references, I will be adding more content on the Pre School as well.
My username: Muthad Page: /info/en/?search=Kidoz_Montessori_and_Pre_School
Thank you! Muthad ( talk) 14:09, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
I am making a first time article submission on Wikipedia and we haven't hired any agency to do the same and hence have put up the entire article on my own. This is one of the most successful cultural festivals of Hyderabad (India) and the only festival that spans across 100 days in the entire country of India. Please let me know how do I go about the editing or please suggest if we have any professional help that I can ask for. You could google for the term HYDOURITE and see the kind of responses you get for the same; if that helps.
Hydourite (
talk)
06:28, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Even though I'm not the author of She-She-She Camps, I appreciate the time that you put into helping the author get the article into main space because I think the information it contains is very interesting. I wasn't involved as much as I wanted to be in helping to improve the article so at this time I was wondering if you could share with me some of the things that you still think need to be improved.
Hi, you edited and rejected the article with Regina E. Herzlinger. I created a usename TrentTrout59 AFTER the article was edited. Do you have any guidance for us? Dr. Herzlinger is one of the foremost health policy analysts in the United States, one of the most admired professors at Harvard Business School, the first woman to earn tenure on the faculty of Harvard Business School, and the author of numerous influential books and articles on health care. I think you're looking for references that aren't HBS websites.
Hi I was asked to provide inline references, this I did. I have waited 2 weeks and now rejected again. I hope you can provide a clue as to what is missing, I did what was asked. /info/en/?search=Draft:Guitar_pickup_potting Thanks The Naughty Badger ( talk) 16:33, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi and thanks, I have added two more inline citations and another video demonstrating the process. I would say that pickup potting is indeed notable and a very important aspect of guitar electronics and certainly not just an aside in the main category. I will certainly add further information and refernces to this article over time. The Naughty Badger ( talk) 09:04, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello! Thank you for your review and feedback. (And also for your nice note.) I am hoping that you could give me some more specific suggestions. About ten days ago, this article was declined for a similar reason, namely that I needed to add more inline citations. I wrote to that reviewer and asked him if he had any ideas about where I should put more citations. I explained that I had been trying to gauge how many citations to put in based on looking at articles about similar academics and using them as models. The two I had chosen were Nelson Lichtenstein (another faculty member at the same institution) and James T. Richardson (another sociologist). Based on those examples (they each only have two), I was afraid that I had actually put too many citations into mine as it is now, and I did not put even more in for fear of looking amateurish. In response, the reviewer said that upon considering my article again, he had concluded that he'd had "brain failure" when reviewing it the first time, and he put it back in the line to be reviewed again. So I did not end up getting any specific feedback as to where more citations might be effective. I'm wondering if you have any that might help me?
Thanks! :)
Lizseach (
talk)
18:49, 13 April 2015 (UTC)Lizseach
Lizseach ( talk) 18:49, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you, Onel5969! That was very helpful. I have revised now with the "more is more" philosophy in mind and resubmitted. I found it somewhat tricky: in order to assert aspects of notability as "facts," and thereby create opportunities to cite them, I was required to say things that felt less neutral. I hope I have managed to strike the right balance. Any further editing suggestions are welcome. Again, many thanks for your help. :) Lizseach ( talk) 07:19, 15 April 2015 (UTC)Lizseacg
Hi! I would like to discuss this edit.
I want to emphasize that sometimes red links are a good thing. Wikipedians want to encourage others to write contents at topics which don't yet have their articles. School districts in the United States have been shown to be notable, and this is a common outcome at AFD. This is especially so for the state of Missouri, where school districts are independent of municipal boundaries and have their own taxation departments. Every single Missouri school district should have a Wikipedia article, and removing redlinks to those topics impedes that goal.
Please don't remove redlinks of Missouri school districts. If you want to have something other than redlinks, please consider writing stubs for these school districts.
I am aware that one of the links points to the wrong target, so I'll hunt it and retarget the link.
Thank you, WhisperToMe ( talk) 14:28, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello ,
In your last message you said that everything was ok about my work ...
so i submit it but it's rejected again ???? i don't understand why
Regards
Bichetteln ( talk) 14:54, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Can you please perform a complete c/e on this article which i am aiming to take to GA status? Please let me know whether you are interested in doing so and if yes, please inform me before beginning the process.
Pavanjandhyala (
talk)
15:45, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing this submission. I am unclear on which of the references are considered unverifiable. All of the selected works are available online via the various journal webpages. The Google Scholar page shows a much larger research base than the selected references and all remaining references are independent of the article subject. Also, after reading the notability guidelines and reviewing many published articles about Dr. Marakas' peers in information research, I am unclear as to how to proceed to further establish notability. Most of Dr. Marakas' works are published in the premiere journals with his field. Would it help to include citation counts from Web of Science? He has been my research mentor for many years and I believe his notability within the field of information systems is beyond reproach. Please guide me in how to proceed to reach a successful publication.
Thanks in advance for any help you can provide. Gomegas ( talk) 15:56, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Gomegas ( talk) 15:56, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Upon reviewing and rejecting my draft you proposed moving this information to "List of surface-to-air missiles".
There are two main problems to this and I am currently looking for solutions.
1. MODERN. "List of surface-to-air missiles" attempts to encompass all of them in existence. My intended scope was relevant, moderns SAMs. Including all SAMs into the list would make the comparison cluttered, and inefficient.
2. By Country. "List of surface-to-air missiles" arranges them by country in alphabetical order. It makes it easy to see what one country has developed. Splitting SAMs up into range categories makes comparing missiles easy, but does not accomplish the task of "List of surface-to-air missiles".
Info Type | "List of surface-to-air missiles" name implicates | List of surface-to-air missiles accomplishes | My article |
---|---|---|---|
All encompassing history | Yes | Yes | No |
In a list format | Yes | Yes | No |
In a table format | No | No | Yes |
A Modern Scope | No | No | Yes |
Comparison | No | No | Yes |
Technical Data | No | No | Yes |
If there was an article named "modern SAMS" or "List of modern SAMS", I would merge without hesitation. There are plenty of articles about modern SAMS(on a case by case basis), but there is no all encompassing article. This is my attempt and making that article.
OK I will propose a new solution that you can critique: -Create an new article called "list of modern surface-to-air missiles" and then add in the comparison tables.
Then there is always the option of accepting my original article. I believe it would be unique article with a unique purpose. Whether its an article about a specific MANPADS, short range SAM, medium range SAM, long range SAM or ABM. My article will remove the need for all the "See also:"s at the end of these pages and reduce the clutter on Wikipedia by a lot. Brovich
Never mind, I fixed the typos in the title.
Thank you,
Brovich
Hi Onel, a colleague of mine asked me to take a look at this page they submitted and asked me to do what I can to edit it. Since I've done a couple of other wiki pages, they thought I might be better able to edit the page and get it up to standard. I would like to submit it by the end of the week, but thought I would check with you first to see if you have any suggestions.
The import of this page Silbermann is primarily his position in the Middle East Cancer Consortium (a stub page that I will also be updating shortly. I want to link to Silbermann's page, as I believe these should be two separate topics).
Your advice is greatly appreciated.
777desha777 ( talk) 17:34, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Onel5969. User:Ktscurria here, back from travels. Regarding /info/en/?search=Draft:Thomas_A._Nazario, they (Tom Nazario and his organization) understandably don’t want to give up their copyright. But if I rewrite the article such that the material objected to is no longer part, is that sufficient, or are there other problems with the material I’ve submitted? Ktscurria ( talk) 20:04, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing my article: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Draft:Cooper_Phillip
Unfortunately it wasn't accepted due to notability issues. I have created citations using 8 reliable sources. Just wondering what could be the problem. Are the sources are not reliable enough?
user name: Yatin Rewale article: /info/en/?search=Draft:Jayantilal_Gada Hello - I got expert feedback that This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. The feedback seems very general and I would like to amend and resubmit, but would like more specifics in order to do so.Please tell me what changes i have to do to get this article accepted.Now I added more references about person from news papers and others web cites.Jayantilal_Gada is one of the famous personality in bollywood industry.Many articles are published on him in news papers and other media.Please help me how can i solve this problem Yatin Rewale ( talk) 06:27, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969, Thanks for your review and for your time. I added many references as you suggested about Stefano Siragusa's new page. Can I do something to improve on the quality of this page? Kind regards, Arfidalocin
Hello Onel5969
this was your two last answer :
[User:Bichetteln|Bichetteln]] ( talk) 14:56, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
+ +
Bichetteln (
talk)
14:07, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
+ +
Bichetteln ( talk) 09:40, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Draft:Jacob_Whitesides
cleaned it up added solid sources please review Danandrewsreporter ( talk) 04:08, 16 April 2015 (UTC)Danandrewsreporter
How and why did you decide so quickly that the above was non-notable? She is a published author. It certainly wasn't advertising as I have no connection with the subject. Smokey TheCat 08:52, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello SmokeyTheCat,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Christelyn Karazin for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Onel5969 (talk) 21:06, 11 April 2015 (UTC) <<< Your entry on my talk page. Smokey TheCat 05:28, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
How can an artist who has a number one hit on Itunes be borderline? An artist in music can go no higher then #1. So we have a number 1 selling artist, 1.5 million twitter followers, in Billboard, Vogue, American Songwriter, and that is borderline? As far as cleaning up grammar...I am not going to invest anymore time in this article until it either gets a green light or a second review from someone with more realistic standards. In all do professionalism, few artists reach number one...in sales on Itunes. That is what makes someone noteworthy. Again, I see no real point of spending time cleaning this up if you are going to be unrealistic in the process of what defines notability.
On a side note this is part of the reason why I hate wikipedia...common sense states if someone reaches number one on the music charts then that is a clearly noteworthy accomplishment...
Hi Danandrewsreporter - Hi. You might pass the notability criteria, it's borderline. I'll let another editor take a crack at it, and see what they think. In the meantime, the article still has a slightly Non-neutral tone, and there are some formatting/grammar issues which need cleaning up. Onel5969 (talk) 15:28, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Danandrewsreporter (
talk)
15:47, 16 April 2015 (UTC)danandrewsreporter
You offered to assist me 10 days ago when I received a rejection notice. Finally, I now have a presentable edit. However, I am not able to resubmit for some unknown (to me) reason. My only writing is an attempt to update the bio of General Richard H Ellis. It is in my sandbox page. I recognize that I do not have full working knowledge of proper reference protocol, and for that, I ask your help. Thank you RubyJMDE ( talk) 20:32, 16 April 2015 (UTC)RubyJMDE
I have completely revised the last few sentences of the bio I would like to edit. Reference sources have been provided. It is now an accurate update for future generations. RubyJMDE ( talk) 20:45, 16 April 2015 (UTC)RubyJMDE
RubyJMDE ( talk) 20:45, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
10 days ago upon my first submission, I was not ready for the final edit. I now have completed it and given accurate references. When trying to resubmit, the edited sandbox does not allow me to finalize the changed edit. Can you provide help or guidance? RubyJMDE ( talk) 20:49, 16 April 2015 (UTC)RubyJMDE
You might want to keep an eye on this. It got out of hand the moment you accepted it. Fiddle Faddle 20:58, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing the article on Alexander Beridze. I have made revisions that I hope will satisfy the copyright concerns and I added a photo of him that was posted on Wikimedia. Wikiawesome also reviewed the article and suggested some changes which I have made. If there are any specific sections or sentences that you think are in need of revision, it would be a big help if you could identify those. I appreciate your help. AnnRos ( talk) 21:31, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Thanks for reviewing my article. I have read the guidelines but wonder if you could tell me what you think is the major reason it's rated a C and not above. My thoughts were, it's a bit rambly and the lead in could be crisper. Any suggestions?
Redilion (
talk) 22:33, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Redilion (
talk)
22:33, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, You very kindly reviewed my submission for a page to be created for my late Father who passed away last year. Unfortunately you denied my article on the basis that it appeared to infringe copyright. The article that has created the conflict was infact written by me - its just that the reporters who published Trevor's Bio never acknowledged that they were my words. I'd still like to try to create an entry for Trevor. He had an interesting life and made a significant contribution to Tourism and Cruising in Sydney a in Fiji. Given the amount of time Id have to invest in writing this getting the formatting correct, figuring out how Wiki works etc, I would therefore like to ask you if you could assist with publishing the article for me? I have volumes of information on Trevor, his life and contribution. Can I send these to you? Do you do this on a paid basis? If you are unable to help, can you recommend someone who might be able to assist me?
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Draft:Captain_Trevor_Haworth&action=edit&redlink=1
Look forward to hearing from you. Best regards, Anthony AnthonyHaworth ( talk) 02:33, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for helping out as I am getting started! MMSS4S ( talk) 06:04, 17 April 2015 (UTC) |
I'm not sure i understand all your answers :
about inline citations when you said he moved to Paris : do you mean i have to explain the reason ???
so i wrote a reason ....
About Reference : i added one link about his work with the French singer Sheila
and one article about CD of the French singer Serge Lama . His CD was succesfull and a new direction for his career . Yann Benoist is credited as arranger and composer on this CD
Bichetteln ( talk) 13:02, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Talimagnum ( talk) 18:32, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, My name is ivan. i have been requested by the son of Alfonso Valdés jr. to write a certain type of biography of his father in wikipedia. Same as his father Alfonso Alfonso_Valdés_Cobián and his daughter Camalia_Valdés he have been involved in a lot of relevant activities as i wrote on the bio. Alfonso Valdes III whos is his son is really confused by why the information he gave is not being taken in a relevant manner since, both his daughter and father got accepted. i really want to help him since i also belive he have been an important person in the industry of island of Puerto Rico.
Hello, I am not sure what other criteria to include for David R. Gastfriend, as it seems to me that he does fit the description, and the details included, for your guidelines of a notable person. Please advise as to how I can make this information more notable. Thank you 38.98.222.171 ( talk) 19:46, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I am at a loss how being a best selling author and having your books being picked up for film doesn't warrant being "notable." I have not referenced Riddle's personal website; I have used Amazon as a reference regarding his book sales, and have used independent sources regarding movie adaptations. What else can I do/reference? It seems strange that I could probably create a page for one of his books, or when the film comes out a page for the film, but I can't create a page for the one who created them? Please advise! Steven C. Price 21:33, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for the review of the article on Alexander Beidze. It was extremely helpful to see the link to the earwig copyvio detector to see the problem areas. I have made quite a few revisions and added some new references that I hope will work to make the article publishable. Could you please review it again? Thanks so much. AnnRos ( talk) 12:38, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your review and your subsequent suggestions. This is my first time using wikipedia to write an article and i did not follow the guidelines needed in citation. Kindly give me another chance to edit and make the article compatible to the guidelines as set by wikipedia. I would start the necessary editing of the whole document and looking forward to your further advice and suggestion please.
Cyberinfo24 ( talk) 13:41, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for approving my article on James B. Drew. Happy to say that I now have 4 articles on Wikipedia. I believe that you have been involved in all of them - my sincere thanks to you. My next goal is to get one of them ranked above Start Class. Buckmor54 ( talk) 16:03, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Articles For Creation Hard Work Barnstar |
For your solid hard work at the WP:AFC coalface Fiddle Faddle 17:28, 18 April 2015 (UTC) |
I made several revisions to avoid any paraphrasing of the references sources. Could you please review the article again? Thank you, AnnRos ( talk) 18:06, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
My article /info/en/?search=Draft:Military_Working_Dog_Teams_National_Monument was declined by you stating it was not naotable. In fact, it is a US NATIONAL MONUMENT and there are dozens of articles about other US national monuments on wikipedia. It was extensively referenced including national media sources. What else is required? Why would a US National Monument not be notable when many others are? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akjayintx ( talk • contribs) 12:40, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deletion of article Janne Kyttanen
Hi, my article (Janne Kyttanen) was deleted for copyright infringement. I wrote the original copy which is featured on this designer's site (ie it is my own copyright). What can I provide as proof of this? Susanemma ( talk) 15:26, 19 April 2015 (UTC) Susanemma ( talk) 15:26, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Thank you for offering to assist with the article. I know Im sounding like a complete Philistine, however can you let me know how I can send you the info? regards, Anthony 58.162.130.101 ( talk) 21:48, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Dear Onel5969,
The following is a link to a dropbox which contains Trevors story and photos.
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/winoibi11x257jw/AABcSZhvh52z8gvUXlCVvc8pa?dl=0
Ive also indicated some further online links below which quote some of the information contained in the document in the dropbox.
http://www.expeditioncruising.com/2014/03/vale-trevor-haworth-am-master-mariner.html
Let me know if you need anything further Best regards, Anthony 58.162.130.101 ( talk) 07:47, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969!
I have a last question concerning my submission. I have read the notability-guidelines and I see how Mr. Rabe doesn't fit into those. You mentioned that we have written "Rabe became internationally well known ..." which suggests that there should be publications in news and media about him and his work. I was thinking about this and the problem here is that notability in this case is also meant as notability within a particular scientific community. A reliable(ish) criterion for this could be the h- and i10-indexes, which are quite high for Mr. Rabe. A problem with scientific work and its notability is, that it often takes decades to evaluate the actual use of research that has been done.
Regarding the publication in news and media: I have found the following, but this again is a very specific publication for scientists working in nano-technology. Nevertheless it is reporting a finding of Mr. Rabe, though it has an advertising character to it and it is not clear who has written the article: http://www.azonano.com/news.aspx?newsID=23930
I have also found several articles from german newspapers but I think those might not be relevant for the english version of wikipedia. If that is not the case, I'd be glad about a notification.
Best regards, pfeilers
Pfeilers ( talk) 10:14, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
The Morris Quinlan Experience
/info/en/?search=Draft:The_Morris_Quinlan_Experience — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeoTheDobermann (talk • contribs) 14:54, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969 Respectfully, I wrote before on 7th March, but it seems I didn't get an answer. Having read the notability guidelines for musical ensembles, it does appear that two of the criteria are met. Here's what I wrote to you earlier:-
/info/en/?search=Draft:The_Morris_Quinlan_Experience
You declined this article (3rd March 2015) on the grounds of not being sufficiently notable. However, I believe at least two of Wikipedia's notability guidelines are indeed met for this ensemble, as follows...
"1. Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself.[note 1] This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media, and television documentaries[note 2] except for the following: Any reprints of press releases, other publications where the musician or ensemble talks about themselves, and all advertising that mentions the musician or ensemble, including manufacturers' advertising.[note 3]
Works consisting merely of trivial coverage, such as articles that simply report performance dates, release information or track listings, or the publications of contact and booking details in directories."
Album reviews in The Times and Melody Maker, as well as the feature article in the Newcastle Journal were all independently written, and despite being unavailable online, are all verifiable.
"12. Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or TV network."
Does not the group's live appearance as guests on Ned Sherrin's Loose Ends programme on BBC Radio 4 (Saturday 11th August 2001) count here? It was a segment of approaching 10 minutes duration, during which Sherrin gave a lengthy introduction to the band, and talked further about them after their live performance of one of their pieces, all in front of a live audience. Most notably, the segment was repeated on the Loose Ends Pick Of The Year show at the end of 2001.
The band can not yet claim 'rotation' play for any of their releases, but they are regulars on Bob Harris's BBC Radio 2 Sunday Show (considered to be a very influential rock music programme, if not the most influential currently on UK radio), and indeed a playlist search shows they have received more Bob Harris plays than even (for instance) Kate Bush!!!
That said their most recent singe release 'Scarborough Fair' received multiple plays on the Radio 2 network, not just from Bob Harris.
BBC Radio 4 and BBC Radio 2 are major national radio networks in the UK.
One of the band's members, Dave Maughan, is well known as a record producer, having recorded and produced Mercury Music Prize nominated Little Black Numbers album by Kathryn Williams, who herself has guested on an MQE released track. Would it be helpful to this article if Dave Maughan had a Wikipedia entry?
Hoping you can reconsider the article...
LeoTheDobermann (talk) 16:29, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Question resubmitted 20th April 2015
LeoTheDobermann LeoTheDobermann ( talk) 11:53, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969,
Thank you very much for your comments on the draft article I submitted to Wikipedia ( /info/en/?search=Draft:Karnabharam_by_Bhasa) a few months back. I have removed the overkill ( :) ) of references in one place, have distributed them across sections and have also included two new ones.
You have an impressive profile! Best wishes, margie — Preceding unsigned comment added by Margieparikh ( talk • contribs) 17:17, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Resubmitting!! This is a fun, learning experience! Thank you! PattiMoly99 ( talk) 19:29, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Good Afternoon! Thank you for your note about my submission. Please help me understand the reason for the decline. I used the Phoenix Nuclear Labe Wikipedia as my template and was as factual using non-expressive language. Any pointers would be welcome. I will re-read the Articles of Notability. The only medical isotope production facility for North America is shutting down (NRU), and we will step in as that does shut down to provide Medical Isotope's, we are working with the US NRC and DOE. I thought I couldn't write more than I did, but if I can in a neutral voice I will! Thank you for your help!
PattiMoly99 ( talk) 17:22, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you OneL5969! Everyone is so helpful here!! One of our Nuclear engineers found some scientific articles written about SHINE by National Labs! So everyone here is pitching in! Thank you again. Lots of reading and trying to understand are in my future today!
PattiMoly99 ( talk) 14:32, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Onel!
Thanks for reviewing my article. I have understood that it is not really ready yet in order to be a real article for Wikipedia.
Anyway, I have inserted the following at the end:
This article on a United States punk rock band is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
Would it work this way?
Thanks!
Angel Spent ( talk) 19:15, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Dear Onel5969,
I hope this finds you well. I am surprised you deleted my article, which was intended to be a stub to allow others to include more information. The reason given concerns notability. However, I would like to stress that the sources used are enough for a short stub. I included three references, none of which was directly related to the subject. Te two books are from reliable publishers; one of them is available on Google Books (snippet view); the other source is a publicly available archive search of the Abbey Theatre (Ireland's National Theatre). I would like to think that these sources are enough. I have recently been introduced to Wiki editing and was hoping to use my expertise to create new articles and to cover some gaps in Irish literary history. I am discouraged and disappointed by what happened, and I hope you would reconsider. All best
irabarbanel — Preceding unsigned comment added by Irabarbanel ( talk • contribs) 19:40, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your response to my latest submission. This is my third submission and I still don't understand what is wrong with it. I have included several independent verifiable sources about the company and I have reviewed several of our competitors in Australia that have Wikipedia entries. I have closely matched the style of information they provided and their reference approach. I have also revieewed your guidelines about the golden triangle but I still don't know what I have to do. Could you please give me some guidance. Do I need more references? Do I need more information on the company? eg We are the fastest growing life insurance company in Australia. What do I need to include to show that we are 'notable'? Thank you in advance for any assistance you can provide. Maplepond ( talk) 22:00, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
I wanted to write regarding your rejection of my recent wiki submission for Spinnaker International.
/info/en/?search=User:Spinnaker-UK/sandbox#Intelligent_Cash_Protection
I am a little disappointed that the article has been rejected on the grounds of lack of notability. This is a unique company in the UK, operating in a very select environment, this alone should be notable.
There are 6 reference links, 5 of which refer directly to industry bodies and/or news articles pertaining to this technology.
Furthermore, an almost identical article for a competitor company has been approved and is on Wikipedia EN & FR today:
/info/en/?search=Oberthur_Cash_Protection
I have purposefully changed the structure of my submission, in the hope it would be published.
Would you be able to take a look at this article again and see if it can be published?
Many thanks
Richard Sokl (Spinnaker-UK) Spinnaker-UK ( talk) 13:41, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for notifying me about your comments on Draft:Philip Robert Presants article. I have stripped out unnecessary and possibly 'informal' text or commentary. Hoping it is now acceptable? JulianHeyes ( talk) 19:22, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Onel55969!
I made an article of an actor but your review of it says it needs more notability stuff, wondered if you could give me some guidance on what would be suitable? its my 1st article so i want it to work! thanks, Mishmash5
Mishmash5 (
talk)
20:31, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Articles for Creation barnstar | |
Whenever I go around AfC, I'm bound to see something reviewed by you. Thank you for your prolific contributions to the wikiproject! Winner 42 Talk to me! 00:05, 22 April 2015 (UTC) |
Hello - thanks for your review. Our updates are complete. Apologies - my staff assumed my web articles and credits spoke for themselves. But we understand the need for corroboration. Please review the new "Recognition" section. Simply put, one does not write for the Oxford press or curate exhibits in public museums by being "un-notable". Thanks for your time. Gregg Miner 66.133.207.13 ( talk) 00:46, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
66.133.207.13 ( talk) 00:46, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
To parse the basic definition a bit: substantive treatment means not just mere mention but real content about the subject, which can be used to verify detailed statements about it. Independent, third party sources means that the sources cited should be completely unconnected to the subject. Reliable sources are those with a reputation for checking the facts, editorial oversight and accuracy – so not some unknown persons on blog or random websites, not Facebook or Linkin, not the subject's own website or any connected to them, not press releases, but books published by major publishing houses, newspaper articles, magazine write-ups, treatment in peer-reviewed scholarly journals and websites that meet the same requirements as reputable print-based sources, etc.
You have not demonstrated the existence of such sources. The draft already notes some of this in its reviews. The recognition section you talk about above does not help. First, articles should be made up of prose paragraphs exploring the topic, not long lists of accomplishments or credits. This article has one sentence of prose followed by lists. Encyclopedia articles are not directories or résumés. The recognition section lists other Wikipedia articles which is useless. Wikipedia is itself not a reliable source but user generated content and citation to other articles is circular. Everything else is mere mentions, all in a section which doesn't belong in the first place. All this is not to say the sources we want don't exist and the type of writing we seek can't be accomplished, but it's distinctly lacking from this draft. A proper article would strip out 90% of the list material, all of which reads as promotional and résumé fodder, and would instead have a few paragraphs of prose with reliable sources cited. To give you an example of some sources that might help, possibly this and this. Neither would be enough to sustain an article – I don't know if enough exist to sustain an article – but those are far more in the realm of the types of sources we're looking for.-- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 11:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Just typing that name on google alone will show you how notable the man is.
You may also want to look into this article in the scholar library http://www.naulibrary.org/dglibrary/admin/book_directory/Thesis/9940.pdf
75.134.126.188 ( talk) 02:49, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your answer ..
I try to understand what you mean so i added some détails in the Contents about " Biography"
and "References"
Regards
Bichetteln ( talk) 12:21, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=User_talk:Klara_cabi#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_GODAN_.28April_21.29
Hi,
I'm writing in about the GODAN draft I did. Just to let you know, I had GODAN send the appropriate copyrights to your copyright department by email. Can you check, please? They cc'd me in so I know it has been sent.
Thanks,
Klara — Preceding unsigned comment added by Klara cabi ( talk • contribs) 12:39, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello! I am looking for advice on what to change in order for my article to be accepted. Nearly every piece of information is substantiated from external/independent source. Could you give me a concrete example of something that I should take out or write differently?
Thank you! Fiona
Fboyd20 ( talk) 14:39, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Hallo. I can make some contributions to subjects related with the study of subatomic particles: deep-inelastic scattering, Quantum chromodynamics, the structure of the proton and so on. For example, the BFKL equation is a missing link of the article about Lev Lipatov (al least). So, I started with article about BFKL. OK, I added link to independet reference, to Particle Data Group. I do not know more "reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject". Could you explain me briefly, what do you expect? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.20.41.39 ( talk) 15:22, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello you were kind enough to review the Wikipedia Post Betty Lane, and further promote it to start class. Since then I have gotten permission to add images of works by Betty Lane to Wikimedia, as well as clippings and exhibition catalogs. Do you think the entry is at C on the Wikipedia Quality scale? Thank you for your feedback, -- 1offby ( talk) 03:00, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Onel5969--very happy to see the C quality rating. Thanks again for your work on the project.-- 1offby ( talk) 00:38, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Archiwriter ( talk) 14:10, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello,
I made edits to this article 10 days ago, including a longer list of sources that point to the notability of the subject, including two documentary films, several academic books both by and about the subject, and an obituary in the most important German cultural newspaper (Die Zeit). I have also included a link to her German Wikipedia page. Please let me know if these edits are sufficient or if something else is required.
Many thanks, Daniela
Thank you and it's really nice of you to help me
i think now i understand specially about footnotes
tell me if it seems ok for you or if i'm on the good way
Regards
Bichetteln ( talk) 16:17, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
I don't understand what that means "an encyclopedia format"? Did yoy need more references?
75.111.82.26 ( talk) 20:20, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969,
I am only here to help, I've done a few articles in the past to try and help East African Artists understand what Wikipedia was about and now I am back. My new article /info/en/?search=Draft:Meaku_%28Musician%29 was declined by you and I understood, I made some changes and added some more reliable sources. If you can please reevaluate it, I would be grateful.
Thank you
-- Hemdee31 ( talk) 20:21, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
PS: How rude of me... Thank you for all the work that you do and taking time to look over our articles.
I don't understand what that means when you say you want my article in a encyclopedia format and something about peacocks. Did you want more references? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.111.82.26 ( talk) 20:23, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I think you were too hard on the draft Karola Bloch -- you declined it even though one of the cited references is a book held by a number of libraries that is exclusively about Bloch. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 20:26, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
I'm getting in touch to learn more about a recently declined page submission for the Learning Technologies Group.
It's my first time adding a page to wikipedia, so I'm not too sure how best to improve it in order to get the page made live, can you provide some feedback on - why exactly the page is declined - how far away the page is from being accepted - what would you be looking for in the page to get it accepted.
I had based the page on other AIM listed companies (such as this : /info/en/?search=Daisy_Group), so I would like to know what you think I should do in order to get the page accepted. I had considered possibly adding a section on the board of directors, as they are well known investors/ directors of other companies... or was the page declined in it's current state because of another reason - citations maybe?
Anyway, I'm all ears on this, I will be creating pages for each company within the group once the LTG page is accepted, so would like to be able to improve how I'm creating the pages in order to ensure I can get them accepted with little trouble.
Look forward to hearing back, kind regards JakeStory ( talk) 08:29, 24 April 2015 (UTC) JakeStory
Hello Onel5969 and thanks for reviewing the page. Are there particular elements of the draft that read like an advertisement and I should look to revise? Thank you!
Fashionista888 ( talk) 10:20, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi there. . . you reviewed a recent submission I made for a french horn player named Fred Fox ( /info/en/?search=Draft:Fred_Fox) and rejected it based on notability issues. I wonder if you might be able to give me any more specific feedback on why the page doesn't meet the notability guidelines. Any advice would be much appreciated! Thank you. Pitneyj ( talk) 14:42, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969 and thanks so much for reviewing my draft. I saw that you declined it on grounds that it read like an advertisement and I was hoping you could point out the specific areas that were of concern? Thanks again really appreciate your help
Slainte12 (
talk)
17:55, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi. You rejected my article for lack of sufficient resources/notability. I've fleshed it out with a couple more sources (that aren't from the Press-Democrat). If you have a moment, could you take a look and let me know if anything else needs to be fixed or if these were sufficient? /info/en/?search=Draft:Nagasawa_Kanaye Thank you. Fuzchia ( talk) 18:54, 24 April 2015 (UTC)Fuzchia
Hi there Onel5969. Ok, I know that he is not that famous, but he will be!!! /info/en/?search=Draft:Muhammed_Emin_%C3%96zt%C3%BCrk
Can you reconsider this article!
Thanks!!!
Sintiminti — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sintiminti ( talk • contribs) 22:57, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments. I've tried to answer all the viewers but last time didn't get any response but and the viewer (Vchimpanzee) copied my answer, so I assumed that my answer was accepted. I'll do as many adaptations as needed in the article in order to follow the rules. Will you be kind enough to respond to my last post in this page?
Here is my last answer from this page:
Hi Vchimpanzee,
Re Fishelov's notability: according to the list of criteria specified in "Wikipeida: Notability (academics)" Fishelov definitely meets the first two criteria: 1. Fishelov's work has made significant impact in his scholarly discipline, i.e. literary studies. His book Metaphors of Genre is widely discussed and cited by scholars working in the field: Google-Scholar counts more than 130 citations of this book, much above the average of scholarly books in that field. It is no coincidence that the article on "Genre studies" on Wikipedia devotes a significant part of its section on "Generic Conventions" to present Fishelov's contribution to that field. 2. Fishelov's book Samson's Locks won the first Bahat Prize. The Bahat Prize is a prestigious Israeli national award for a scholarly, non-fiction book and many Israeli scholars in the Humanities and the Social Sciences compete for that prize. Moreover, Fishelov has also made a substantial impact outside academia in his academic capacity, hence he also meets criterion #7: based on his reputation as a literary scholar Fishelov was invited to chair the committee appointed by the Israeli Ministry of Culture and the Jerusalem municipality, to award the prestigious Yehuda Amichai Prize in poetry. Furthermore, the numerous reviews and essays Fishelov published in the literary supplements of three national Israeli newspapers made a significant impact outside academia. Note also the important role he played in introducing to Israeli readers to several classical works of modern English literature (e.g. Robinson Crusoe) by writing comprehensive afterword to their Hebrew translations.
Let me also mention the fact that Fishelov was invited to teach at several distinguished universities, including UC Berkeley, University of Chicago, Columbia University and EHESS in Paris. Perhaps this last fact, in and of itself, does not fall exactly into the list of criteria listed in "Wikipedia: Notability (academics)", but it is definitely another indication of his reputation as a leading scholar in the field of literary studies.
Re Fishelov's books: I elaborated a bit on the content of Fishelov's books and briefly described several reviews in order to illustrate his contribution to literary studies both in Israel and abroad. If you want me to shorten or to change that part, please let me know. Davidgute ( talk) 05:44, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
the article is rejected for the reason of references .. unfortunately this 1000 year old temple in India do not have anything written on internet, hence I was trying to add information on this beautiful temple, please guide me how to add references if they are not available at all ? ?Unfortunately many old temples in India like this are no documentation by government authorities too !
Thank you Mahesh Pathak ( talk) 12:27, 25 April 2015 (UTC)Mahesh Pathak
I don't understand why you declined my article for Watch What U Wish... In regards to Notability because I checked the qualifications for an Album to be Notable on the following page --> Wikipedia:MUSIC and it has passed TWO of the requirements. The two that my article passed are as follows;
The two published works are HipHopDX and Faygoluvers which both have NOTHING to do with the artists who made the album.
And it has also passed;
The chart it appeared on was Billboard's Top 25 Heatseakers. It doesn't get any bigger and more notable than Billboard as far as Charts are concerned.
So please re-review my article and consider accepting it for creation. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CECB:5060:75C2:28BF:C45F:D8E7 ( talk) 17:11, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969!
I posted that article on the french wikipedia (with some help). But the french wikipedia isn't working exactly as this one obviously. So I would definitely appreciate your help for my article. I'm kinda lost.
/info/en/?search=Draft:Robert_Gbian.
Merci beaucoup!
-- Afiavi2014 ( talk) 18:36, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Dear One:
First of all, I hope you are having a great weekend. The reason I'm writing is because you had rejected an article draft I had made on a Mexican TV conductress from Monterrey whose name is Michelle Gonzalez. The reason I was given is that this person is not notheworthy enough to have an article on Wikipedia, which I don't believe is the case. I have worked on this draft and added more sources than it initially had when you first reviewed it. I don't know if it would be possible for you or another editor to look at it and give me anymore suggestions as to how to further improve it in order to get it published. Thank you in advance for your invaluable help. This is the link to my most current draft on this person: /info/en/?search=User:OmarIsahuCorral/sandbox#Grace_Michelle_Gonz.C3.A1lez_T.C3.A1mez
OmarIsahuCorral ( talk) 01:19, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
A number of our competitors already have pages approved on Wikipedia. We feel that we have as much history and interest for readers as they do to justify a wikipedia page. I have amended the opening paragraph, and would be interested to know which bits the editor felt were too much like an advert so that I can amend these too? Wherever possible, I have referenced external journal articles that relate to the research undertaken by the company in the development of its products as external links to verify the credentials of the page.
Many thanks for your help and look forward to hearing from you soon
Katie
Dartex123 (
talk)
07:41, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
Just dropping you a message to see if my draft is now ready to be published? Would be great if it could be, as many of my professional contacts are requesting that we have a wikipedia page on Romail.
I have inserted the link to the draft, it would be much appreciated if you could have a look at it.
/info/en/?search=Draft:Romail_Gulzar
Kind Regards
Immie — Preceding unsigned comment added by Romg10 ( talk • contribs) 08:18, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your answer
i have done some corrections in "Réference" is that you talk about in your last message ????
tell me about ..
if it seems ok next time i think i will submit again???? What do you think
Best regards
Bichetteln ( talk) 14:06, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
My article on Onissim Goldovsky was rejected due to insufficient footnotes. I placed additional footnotes in the indicated places and resubmitted for review. I have not heard back. Are there additional problems?
PalmerWolf ( talk) 15:41, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello,
I'm creating an article on the company "Education at Work." It has been declined twice due to it sounding "more like an advertisement." I'd like to know exactly what I can do to fix that issue because I've made numerous edits and ensured of its credibility with my references. At the moment, I'm just a little confused as to what your reasoning is and would like some insight.
Thanks, Mahmike7 ( talk) 19:00, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Bhimsworth ( talk) 19:37, 27 April 2015 (UTC) Hi OneL5969. I was wondering if you could provide me with insight on what changes I need to make towards my article to have it approved. I would appreciate any advice you can give me. Thank you. I would like the article to be approved, as it is for one of my classes and I am willing to make the required changes. Thank you for your time.
Hi there,
Can you please give me some feedback for my client Sfhome who has submitted an article for inclusion on Wikipedia that has been denied. Here is a link
/info/en/?search=Draft:David_Gardner
Thank you and Sincerely, 76.113.71.168 ( talk) 22:58, 27 April 2015 (UTC) Audrey Nadia Rubinstein
Hi there, Hope you are doing well. My client is getting ready to launch a large non-profit project that gives back to the community. His previous experience and notable past is that he is a cofounder of Ishares. His profile was rejected by Wikipedia and I would really appreciate any and all advice you have for resubmission.
Here is a link to the article: /info/en/?search=Draft:David_Gardner
Many thanks,
Audrey Nadia Rubinstein Sfhome ( talk) 23:15, 27 April 2015 (UTC) Sfhome ( talk) 23:15, 27 April 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sfhome ( talk • contribs) 23:02, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm finally getting around to revising and expanding the sandbox page for Saving and Preserving Arts and Cultural Environments ( /info/en/?search=User:Joyamerica/sandbox), which you reviewed and declined a bit ago. I'll be sure to have good sources for everything before resubmitting.
First question for ya: I'm not understanding how to get an image in the image box. Right now, it just shows the file-name "Slidshow-Seymour-2.jpg" -- Let me know if you can help!
Thanks, Jenn — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joyamerica ( talk • contribs) 00:40, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
user name: Yatin Rewale article: /info/en/?search=Draft:Jayantilal_Gada Hello - My Article Draft:Jayantilal Gada has been rejected after review, with the Expert's feedback .I would like to amend and resubmit, but would like more specifics in order to do so.Please tell me what changes i have to do to get this article accepted.Now I made some changes for improve my article.Please check and help me. Yatin Rewale ( talk) 10:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969, thank you for reviewing my article. would it be possible for you to help me make it appropriate for Wikipedia as I'm a little unsure on how to do this. Maybe you could give me some further advice in how to do this. thank you chris Christiannaps ( talk) 10:32, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Rêve En Vert was founded in 2013 by Cora Hilts and Natasha Tucker and was born from a blog that Hilts started during her Masters course in Environmental Politics and Sustainability. Tucker has a degree in Art History and an MA in Art and Politics, and spent a year working on an organic farm in Bermuda, which is where her love for sustainability stems from.[3] Together they were shocked at the realisation that the fashion industry - second only to energy - is the second worst polluting industry in the world,[4] and thus Rêve En Vert was born.
While studying for her masters in environmental politics and sustainability, Cora Hilts began a blog centering on ________ in _____. Natasha Tucker had developed an interest in sustainability while working on an organic farm. Tucker responded to Hilts blog, and when the two discovered that the fashion industry is the second worst polluting industry in the world (the foremost being the energy industry), they decided to form a company to attempt to address that situation. The result was the creation of Rêve En Vert.
Hanjush (
talk)
13:28, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
My draft on de:Jürgen Neffe: His biography on Einstein was not only published in the US, it was highly acclaimed. Shall I add more reviews on "Einstein - A biography". Further on he has developed de:Libroid, a new multimedia interactive ebook which, being multilingual, can also be read and consumed in English and was reviewed by English and American media (see there). What else is needed to make a person like him, who has lived and worked in the US as a correspondent for Der Spiegel, "notable". Thanks for your help! Hanjush Hanjush ( talk) 13:28, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for looking at the new page patrol and for commenting at Wikipedia_talk:New_pages_patrol#Proposal_for_a_.22wait.22_tag. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:45, 28 April 2015 (UTC) |
I do not understand what within my submitted article is considered copyright infringement. Please specify so I can make the proper changes.
Prreyes ( talk) 16:22, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I must've been looking at something else. Which sources are insufficient? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prreyes ( talk • contribs) 17:53, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi-
It is not clear to me how to modify this to meet the request of better references.
The page submission was an attempt to link this person to his name on the Guggenheim Fellowship awardee list on this page: /info/en/?search=List_of_Guggenheim_Fellowships_awarded_in_2010
and was modeled after similar awardee stub pages, e.g.:
/info/en/?search=C._Josh_Donlan
/info/en/?search=Christy_Anderson
There are many many pages like this, which seem to be made to complete the connectivity of the wiki Guggenheim Fellowship list to individuals. Indeed the Guggenheim award on its own appears to be enough to have a stub included.
Maxvs91 ( talk) 21:33, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi There! I saw you didn't approve the SkyTechSport page. Seen here: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Draft:SkyTechSport&redirect=no. I have no idea what else to change. I seriously have done everything people have told me and can't catch a break. ha Please advise what else you think I need to change. Thanks so much for your help! :) Alex at SkyTechSport ( talk) 00:23, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the ping thanks O. Turns out that 65.183.78.112 ( talk · contribs) was adding bogus numbers to any article that they touched. I filed an AIV but it hasn't been replied to yet. Thus, I wanted to let you know about this so you can keep an eye out for in case this IP continuous on. Thanks for your time and cheers. MarnetteD| Talk 01:38, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
User Name: Gkwork Article Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Music_Fest_Perugia
Hi, thanks for the reviewing. what kind of citations should I add? I have these articles from the internet: Link 1 Link 2 Link 3 Link 4 Link 5 Link 6 Link 7 Link 8
I didn't provide all of them as citaition since most are in italian and the 2 that I have provided contain all the information on the page.
in addition to these there are articles in printed newspaper mostly in italian which I didn't know how and if to include.
thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gkwork ( talk • contribs) 05:16, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks!
Hi! This is the article that my message refers to /info/en/?search=Draft:CaratLane. You recently reviewed it and declined its submission, I have changed the article based on the reasons for rejection. Could you please take another look at it and let me know if you have any further suggestions?
Thanks very much for your time!
([[User:Kiranbramakrishna|Kiranbramakrishna]]|[[User talk:Kiranbramakrishna|t]] )([[User:Kiranbramakrishna|COI]]) ( talk) 10:13, 29 April 2015 (UTC)Kiranbramakrishna
Hi, you just reviewed an article about Herve Moulin ( /info/en/?search=Draft:Herv%C3%A9_Moulin) You claimed that his article "do not adequately show the subject's notability". I have provided evidence that Moulin's work is relevant by showing it was quoted in a Nobel Laureate speech. Also, I provided links to already existing pages in wikipedia which talk about his work, see /info/en/?search=Participation_criterion, /info/en/?search=Mathematical_economics or /info/en/?search=Entitlement_(fair_division). Moreover, I am providing evidence of scientific journals: I do not know of any material which I can quote that is more verifiable (I am even providing the ISBNs and DOIs) or notable of including in an encyclopedia.
Your feedback and reevaluation will be very acknowledged.
You rejected Hilary Paynter, which I have now published, and which is about someone who has works in the Victoria & Albert Museum, and The Ashmolean; who is an Honorary Member of the Royal Birmingham Society of Artists; and a Past President of the Royal Society of Painter Printmakers, as non-notable. Rejecting good articles such as this is damaging to Wikipedia, and demotivating to editors. Please review WP:N and WP:BITE. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:59, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
You and I usually disagree, and therefore I think you are usually wrong, but, irregardless, I greatly appreciate your hard work at Articles for Creation! Please keep up your great work, with more care or more cookies as appropriate. Arthur goes shopping ( talk) 23:14, 29 April 2015 (UTC) |
Hi I have done my very best to provide the most accurate information about my article to your esteemed office. I even went as far as sending soft copies of the 2 separate articles from the 2 different magazines from 1987 to Mr Axl Matulic so as to verify the sources of the draft of my article.
As for notability, I believe anyone who had escaped with about 2 to 3 million dollars of money through fraudulent mail order business in 1986 in the USA and had done something similar in 2012 in Singapore taking unsecured loans from almost all major banks here) and again escaping to an overseas location is worth reading and taking note of.
I cant figure out what else could I do to encourage your office to publish my article on your homepage.
I would be obliged if you could please reply to me directly at jerry.mohinani@yahoo.com.
Regards
Jerry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victim86 ( talk • contribs) 04:42, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, One15969, you might remember me from the article on Barry Kerzin which you kindly helped me with and eventually approved. I wonder if you could advise me, please? I have been working on a related article, on the Dalai Lama, since I saw what was written really needed some correction and improvement, and over the last week or so I added quite a bit of carefully researched information, with citations, to state what I know to be the facts (I've known the present Dalai Lama personally and been a Tibetan Buddhist myself for the last 40 years). However, someone called Victoria Grayson has just come in and deleted everything I added wholesale saying it was "original research". Could you have time to take a look and let me know if it is right, that my addition is inappropriate, or whether it's just a case of vandalism. It's the second time he/she's deleted all my work here and this person seems to have an axe to grind and is determined to cling to his/her views - despite all my careful research and addition of what I thought were adequate citations along with references to other related Wikipedia articles; and also detailed explanations which I posted in the related discussion on the article's 'talk' page. If it's a form of vandalism, what can I do about it? Many thanks, MacPraughan ( talk) 09:17, 30 April 2015 (UTC) P.S> I changed my user name from Sean M Jones
Hello,
Thank you very much for reviewing the article I submit. I would really appriciate it if you can give me some more details of how i can improve my article. I understand that the references are not notable, however is the content right? Should I add more information, like awards? Also, I found some good references in websites such as postonline.co.uk and insurancetimes.co.uk, however you need to subscrive to view the articles. Is this a problem?
This is the link to my article
/info/en/?search=Draft:RIAS_insuranceCite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
Thank you very much, Antonia.christodoulou 80.0.219.171 ( talk) 14:01, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
One15969
I truly respect your editor status and wanting WIKI to present itself in the highest mode. Can you help the Club Manitou article? It truly was an important part of Michigan history in 1930's-1940's. It then morphed into the Club Ponytail in 1962. The Ponytail was the premier mid-west teen dance club from 1962 until it was destroyed by fire in 1969. Both articles are important to Michigan history. Thank you-EFV — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eugene Francois Vidocq ( talk • contribs) 17:10, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I really need some help and guidance in creating this page. The subject: Charles Edward Hall has been santa for Radio City Music Hall for 30 years and his book is being turned into a movie. I feel like that is noteworthy enough for wikipedia. Could you please help me organize this information correctly.
Thanks,
100.33.115.76 (
talk)
17:37, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi One5969 -
I was just in Scottsdale last weekend. Great weather as it was cooler than normal. I have updated the draft for Florence Morse Kingsley located at: /info/en/?search=Draft:Florence_Morse_Kingsley#Professional_life
Much of her work is still available even though it was written a century ago. Not sure if it meets Wikipedia's standards. Let me know. Regards, Sfo1980 Sfo1980 ( talk) 20:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 |
Archive 17: April 2015
Hello . Thanks for your review of my submission of article : Yasmina My username is Yasmina Fan I don't know how to make the citation in English if the source website is completely in Arabic , can you explain a way to do that ? Also I tried to write in a neutral tone and avoid all peacock terms. Almost every sentence I wrote is referenced , so the opinion is not mine, its from the reference website. So I don't really understand where is the error in my writing tone. Please explain and I will fix. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yasmina Fan ( talk • contribs) 21:54, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
NeoLife1958 ( talk) 02:47, 1 April 2015 (UTC) My page is /info/en/?search=Draft:Arthur_Furst. I don't understand what changes have to be made. I cited sources. I am making this wiki page on behalf of my company, GNLD International and most of the info is from a site we made for Arthur Furst: http://www.gnldcontent.com/ArthurFurst/index.html NeoLife1958 ( talk) 02:47, 1 April 2015 (UTC)NeoLife1958
Hi, just wondering what more I should do with Draft:Tricot (band). As far as I can tell the article satisfies criteria 1, 2 and 4 of the notability guidelines. Could you explain why it doesn't satisfy any of these? Pwrong ( talk) 02:53, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969. I reviewed this article: /info/en/?search=Draft:Disinfect_(band). Should show the validity of the sources.
Hi Onel5969. It helped me out, thanks for that. I still have problems with the validity of the sources. In this case I listed renown sources in several languages, still the referencing seems to be an issue. I thought Magazines do count as 3rd party sources.
Bichetteln ( talk) 14:56, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello,
i added new documents on the page : one on ( Reference ) , one "offical website" on (External links) and sources from Wikipedia on (See also )
am i on the good way ??????
Bichetteln ( talk) 14:56, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi there,
Just noticed you reverted an edit of mine on a list of learning management systems. What are the parameters for adding new LMS's? The one I added seemed to fit in well and I was going to add more before I noticed your edit.
Warm regards, Jimmy
JMelons ( talk) 15:06, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969,
A couple months ago you declined my article for "JAM Paper & Envelope". I'm wondering, was it close to being accepted? I thought I referenced a good amount of legitimate sources. Is there a certain type of source I would need that would push my article to be accepted? Do I need a company profile from a big news source?
Thanks, Vargarnar ( talk) 16:09, 1 April 2015 (UTC)Vargarnar
Dear onel5969, we got your message and we edited the page so it can meet the requirements of wikipedia. We are actually trying to translate the Italian page http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamponatura already available in wikipedia, since there's no wiki page for this masonry type. Moreover I would like to underline that the Italian page has no reference, whereas we referred to european standards and a european approved project. Please, let us know if it is still not worth to be accepted.
Best regards.
Dept. of civil engineering of the university of Padova — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dicea.unipd ( talk • contribs) 16:26, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
I'd like to ask for advice on how to formalize the tone of the article.
Hi Onel5969, would you please let me know how to formalize the tone of the article so that it is in line with Wikipedia's standards? I'm also having a little trouble figuring out which details are worthy of the article (such as the show that he produces and which comedy publications have written about him). I think he's definitely notable enough for inclusion based on other comedians who have Wikipedia entries. Thank you.
Davidwrubin ( talk) 16:52, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I am AnkaIva
/info/en/?search=Draft:Bjorn_Gunnar_Lefnaer
I understand that more reliable sources are needed. We found two articles about Mr.Lefnaer. Both in foreign magazines. One in French and another in German. One talks about his hobby as an avid luxury cars collector. Another is talking about him running his multimilloan euro company.
but We only have hard copies, no electronic links to it. If I make a reference to both magazines, names and dates of publication but without an electronic links, would they be accepted by Wiki editors?
Thanks so much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ankaiva ( talk • contribs) 17:10, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Onel5969,
First, thank you for reviewing my submission: /info/en/?search=Draft:Mark_Anthony_%28Author/Psychic%29
I was hoping you could point out any examples where the Article (NPOV) could be improved so that I could make the edits required for approval. Thank you, ewaretroy — Preceding unsigned comment added by EwareTroy ( talk • contribs) 21:56, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Onel5969,
Thank you again for the clarification. I will try to clear up the article and resubmit. Your feedback and assistance is appreciated. EwareTroy — Preceding unsigned comment added by EwareTroy ( talk • contribs) 20:21, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi One15969 Thanks for reviewing the Chris King article. you say he is not a notable person. Is this because he doesn't have a college education? He's a serial entrepreneur with quite a large social media following. He's also involved in charitable work. Can you give me a steer to improve the chances of approval. Kind regards
Harold Sloan (
talk)
22:06, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia (7th nomination)... Hafspajen ( talk) 22:25, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for taking the time to review my page.
I'd appreciate some clarity on one aspect of the feedback: 'should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources'
My sources include CNBC, Economic Times and Forbes India, in addition to sites like Afaqs.com and campaignindia.in which are well-known advertising sites in India. Could you explain why these sites are considered less-than-suitable? And what sort of sites should I include instead?
I'm rather new at this, so I really would appreciate your help.
Thothbubble ( talk) 05:26, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
If I had the flair for writing, then there would not have been the need for editors. Your explanation on what needs to be done in order for the draft to be approved is quite unclear for me. Could you please be able to provide a much simpler outline of what exactly are you looking for to approve of the draft. The person is an author of 4 books, that is not just a directory listing, that is considered a reference as per APA and other methodologies. Like the Apple process of app approval, the acceptance or rejections are based on your feelings and perceptions. The links that you have outlined do not explain your perspective and perceptions. So could you please outline what it would require for this article to be approved? There are more links and resources in that article than in many of the approved articles on other similar personalities. I am sure that you are a fair editor that wants to help create history not be selective about who is worthy enough based on your choices. There are so many other individuals that are NON American and do more amazing things but since they are not covered in the media or have links cannot be included. That is totally unfair to the achievements of those individuals. The article in question is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jayant_Varma — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.211.153.60 ( talk) 16:08, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
I think this time the draft has merit and deserves your acceptance. What do you think about it ? Thanks, Iulian Vamanu
Ivamanu ( talk) 16:56, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969,
I was responsible for the addition to the Sacramento Magazines Section of the Sacramento, Ca Wikipedia page. My I inquire as to why you removed this information? It is neither offensive nor inaccurate.
Your feedback is welcome however your edit is unwarrented.
A Big Sacramento Fan!
Dmanis2kool — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmanis2kool ( talk • contribs) 18:08, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
I am not actually asking for a re-review, please read. I have added several references to the bottom of the article. I am not sure where to put them inline as they basically all have the same info. I was wondering if there is a way I could invite others to help finish it?
Other than that I'm really not sure why it would have been declined. She does fit the following criteria: Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart & Has had a record certified gold or higher in at least one country. Her other tours are already posted on their own pages. This one was just announced 3/31/2015, so there won't be a whole lot of articles. However, I have found several. I believe Entertainment Weekly & onlyciara.com would constitute as reputable.
MoJo3161981 ( talk) 19:11, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello, i would like to know how i would make my article more notable, i believe that it is an important article showing notability. she is a person who shows how the justice system is flawed, but i would like your opinion on how i could improve my article. Thank you.
/info/en/?search=Draft:Detention_of_Kam_Brock — Preceding unsigned comment added by Areed06 ( talk • contribs) 19:57, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Hey there. Sorry for the late response, I have been very busy and it easy for me to lose track of things. I greatly appreciate you going through and adding places where I require citation. It was very helpful.
I do have a question though. While I can see some places where the citations need to be found, there are many points you labeled where all I have done is paraphrased the article which is linked within that paragraph, or is linked in a previous/later citation, but not within that exact paragraph. Should I link everything even if it is to the same source? How do I go about doing that without cluttering up my sources?
I know some cases this isn't the issue and I need to go back through my personal list of sites and whatnot, but in other cases it is listed explicitly in one of the two books I am citing, both published by universities, so cited it within the paragraph, not each individual thought that way I would avoid quoting too much.
Thank you again for the time and effort you have put into this. -Sage
[ [1]] — Preceding unsigned comment added by SageheartBK ( talk • contribs) 23:55, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
I took a look at the articles you suggested, and drastically cut the content of the article back to indisputably essential and encylopedic facts. Since venture capital firms are mostly notable for the companies that they have funded - removing the portfolio section is rather like removing the "artists produced" section from a music producers entry or "author's edited" from a publisher entry, but that's just my opinion I guess :)
76.21.41.198 (
talk)
03:31, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello ,
Thanks for your advice ,
so today in "See Also" i added 3 new articles .and i take off ""Linked in "
Waiting for your answer .
Regards
Bichetteln ( talk) 13:47, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
14:56:16, 1 April 2015 review of submission by Bichetteln
Hello ,
Thanks for your advice ,
today in "See Also" i took off "Linked in " and i added 3 articles as you ask ....
Regards
Bichetteln ( talk) 14:07, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you so much for taking the time to review my article and leave notes on what I could do to make it better. This was my first wikipage to create and the advice will help me get this page published. Once again thank you so much and if you have any more advice I would love to recieve some. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrohde13 ( talk • contribs) 14:11, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I have now completely re-jigged the entire article as you suggested. Am I getting there? Even found a ref for the brain abscess story. What's next? Eagerly, Sean M Jones ( talk) 16:48, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
I contancted the person for more details of his early and personal life as you said it was needed and he sent me more info which I included but some of these details are minor and dating from the 1960s or earlier, and therefore they are not independently verifiable with external citations. Nevertheless, since they fit with the rest of the picture I have included them in good faith without attaching any independent citations, adding phrases like "he recounts", "he recalls" and "he remembers". So how to deal with that? The High School has no archives about the tennis team or the philosophy club from the 2000s never mind the 1960s. Should I delete it all again? Thanks for your help with this, I did spend a lot of time looking for citations which don't exist but you said we need details of his early life. Sean M Jones ( talk) 14:04, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
No Hostility,
Can you clarify the standards then? Because the 'Government Technology Magazine' has neither the circulation, Presence, nor the history of Inside Publications nor Sacramento News & Review. What facts do you have to support that either of the magazines do not meet the Wiki Standards?
Any Clarification would be greatly appreciated.
Many Thanks,
Dmanis2kool — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmanis2kool ( talk • contribs) 19:55, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
I had an online chat with the help desk. We discussed the validity of the citations for the entry. I was told they were just lists. They are indeed "lists" of the times, places and events participated in by a notable track athlete. The entry is a factual narrative of the information. These sources are the same sources an author of a NYTimes article on the subject would use to verify one's accomplishments. These are the most credible sources to confirm a track athlete's success. All other information comes from information not on the web which the web help person said was fine to use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trb127 ( talk • contribs) 23:08, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, can you please copyedit Gemini (2002 Tamil film)? It is about to be TFA on 13 April, although nominator Sriram Vikram did not place a TFA request, and he was unhappy with the FAC outcome - passing despite unsatisfactory prose. and he is currently absent from Wiki. Kailash29792 ( talk) 03:07, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
User: Ramanhome Article: /info/en/?search=Draft:Thiru_Narayana_Iyengar
Hi Onel5969
Thanks a lot for your detailed help and guidance. Based on your suggestions, i have changed all the things that you had requested in your previous post as below. Please check the draft and let me know if i can resubmit.
Thanks Raman Ramanhome ( talk)Ramanhome
First, even though the underlying links might be in Tamil, the reference notes themselves need to be in English.
Reply>>> He is Tamil scholar in the pre-internet times. One of the references is in English, rest are in Tamil because articles about him were written in the Tamil vernacular since he is a Tamil scholar.
You misunderstand, Ramanhome, I'm speaking about the citation footnote in the article, not the underlying citation. The underlying citation may be in Tamil, but when you create the footnote, that needs to be in English. To me, it looks like only 3 or 4 sources are referenced.
Reply>>> How many references do you need to accept the article? This cannot be a reason to reject the article.
You need at least 3 solid references to show notability. Then, since this is a biography, you need a fair amount of references to validate the underlying assertions in the article. Most of the Tamil language in the article also needs to go away.
Reply>>> yes i have removed most of the tamil language in the article. Pls check and let me know.
Much better. I think the quotes in the original are okay, but you could (if you wanted to), simply leave the English translations. All the raw links in the article have to go away.
Reply>>> what do you mean by the raw links? pls give an example of a raw link.
A raw link is simply inserting a link to an external source by using a weblink. An example would be in the Literary Work section, Madurai Tamil Sangam is a raw link. Simply put the name of the item, since the link does not have anything to do with the subject of the article, you shouldn't even use it as a reference. If the link showed the subject's relationship to the item, than you should use it as a reference. Your first two references are also raw links. You can find out how to format citations at WP:CIT. And finally, the article has an WP:NPOV issue
Reply>>>Please be specific in places where you do not find no neutrality. Identify those places in the article.
Avoid using peacock or overly positive terms. "detailed work" should simply be work. "well discussed" should simply be discussed. "fully dedicated" should simply be dedicated. Get rid of words like that (other examples: "elaborate", "novel" (as in novel way), "important". Ramanhome (talk)Ramanhome
Hope all this helps. Onel5969 (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
thanks for your help....
Best regards Bichetteln ( talk) 13:50, 4 April 2015 (UTC) |
Hi, I am writing about this:
A Saucerful of Secrets (song): Difference between revisions From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Revision as of 10:42, 4 April 2015 (edit) 87.7.43.20 (talk) ← Previous edit
Latest revision as of 13:55, 4 April 2015 (edit) (undo) Onel5969 (talk | contribs) (Reverted 1 good faith edit by 87.7.43.20 using STiki)
Probably good faith is yours, have you ever listened to ASOS?
In the studio version the low rumbling sound is made by vari speeded timpanies, playing A♯ and C♯, the infamous cymbals* are in the high spectrum they are sounding like pieces of glass§.
"We did the first part starting from the high pitches of the cymbals. We placed a mike right next to the cymbals and we hit them very lightly with wooden hammers. Actually, this creates a sound that is very different from that of the cymbals§." (D. Gilmour talking with D. Frikte in Musician, n. 50, Dec. 1982)
In the live version the bass is playing A♯ and C♯, so is the bass instead of the timpanies. :-)
Hope it could help, take care! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rabarbarum3000 ( talk • contribs) 20:18, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
I won't dispute your judgment there, but perhaps you could have saved both of us a little time by using a more descriptive editsum than "rev incorrect edit". I think that much was self-evident; it was obviously a revert, and reverts are generally used to remove "incorrect edits" of one kind or another. Cheers,― Mandruss ☎ 00:44, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969: Puzzled about your reversion of my addition to < /info/en/?search=Paradise_Valley,_Arizona> earlier today -- not clear how this was a copyright violation since I rephrased the source in my own words. ?? How can I add this historical information without being reverted again? thanks for any help... wcwkS15 — Preceding unsigned comment added by WcwkS15 ( talk • contribs) 02:15, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! -- WcwkS15 ( talk) 17:26, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Is it appropriate to ask you to review a revision for this addition? If so, how's this? (I didn't format the refs yet because I don't know how these would go up on your Talk page). Thanks! WcwkS15 ( talk) 20:36, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
The land that became Paradise Valley was first used by European settlers as a grazing ground for cattle. The name was given in the 1880s by Frank Conkey, Manager of the Rio Verde Canal Company, which surveyed the land to develop it for agricultural purposes.[Will Barnes, Arizona Place Names (University of Arizona Press, 1997), p. 318] Legend has it that he named the area "Paradise Valley" because of the abundance of spring wildflowers and Palo Verde trees.[“About Paradise Valley”, http://www.paradisevalleyliving.com/about/, accessed 4/7/15] Modest homes and small resorts began to be built in the area, which was notable for large lot sizes (1-5 acres).[”Town of Paradise Valley History”, http://www.ci.paradise-valley.az.us/DocumentCenter/Home/View/223, accessed 4/7/15] As development accelerated after World War II, residents began to fear annexation by nearby and expanding Phoenix and Scottsdale, threatening the low density, non-commercial character of the area. To prevent this, a “Citizens Committee for the Incorporation of The Town of Paradise Valley, Arizona” was formed and gathered enough signatures to present a petition for incorporation to the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors. On May 24, 1961, the Board incorporated the Town of Paradise Valley.[”Town of Paradise Valley History”, http://www.ci.paradise-valley.az.us/DocumentCenter/Home/View/223, accessed 4/7/15]
Thanks! I will go ahead and post this. Frank Conkey is specifically cited in the reference given (I have updated it to the newer expanded edition). WcwkS15 ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 17:40, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for the review of the article. I think I have now added enough references from notable sources (news agencies and international conferences) to show the importance of the company. I have also gone to the "live chat" and asked the helpers there. They have told me that the article is now good enough for re-submission. Thanks.
Leashoffreedom ( talk) 10:30, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Am very confused as to what Wikipedia wants as proof that Robert Honablue was employed as a recording engineer for CBS Records (NYC) -as well as what proof Wikipedia needs to show that he engineered albums for them -especially in light of the fact that Wikipedia has these albums posted elsewhere that cleary states him as the Recording Engineer, Mastering Engineer, or both. Robert was employed by CBS Records, Motown Studios, and did in fact run a recording studio with George Benson in the 70's. Tape-Op did a featured story on Robert which ran last year -and is still running. Getting on Wikipedia is really a very, very hard thing for credited people to get on because of the red tape that makes no sense. Please check out your listing of Edgar Winter's White Trash LP and Laura Nyro's Christmas and the Beads of Sweat -and explain to me how Robert is noted on them -yet can't be recognized for such on his own page. And likewise, on his previous school's site (www.THIaudio.org) he has endorsements from the late Dave Brubeck, Dave's oldest son, Darius, and the legendary George Benson. Yet that seems to have no merit with Wikipedia. Just trying to help a retired person who has been in the industry for 48 years to get his props. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Recording1948 ( talk • contribs) 15:24, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
I am really having a difficult time with getting Robert Honablue on your pages. I have researched a lot of your pages of recording artists that are on Wikipedia and found Robert Honablue's name attached to several of their recordings -which is indicated on the pages of Wikipedia. Is this an error by Wikipedia??? And did CBS Records err by noting Robert Honablue on many of their released albums that cite Robert Honablue's name??? Can someone talk to me man-on-man about submissions that are accepted on other Wikipedia pages -but not good enough for Robert to have his own page about such??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Recording1948 ( talk • contribs) 16:04, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Sir, I believe that I have included the references that support this book as being noteworthy and am resubmitting my article for your reveiew, suggestions and more helpful comments. I have contacted the book's author seeking permission to add the book cover image to the commons list so that it can be used for this article. Thanks for helping me with my first book article.
Rich23 (
talk) 17:31, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Rich23 (
talk)
17:31, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Dear Editor,
thanks a lot for your feedback. I have added some new references, as recommended. Please let me know if anything else is needed to complete the article.
Link: /info/en/?search=Draft:Gheorghe_Morosanu
Username: ivamanu
89.135.34.187 ( talk) 17:56, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
I have edited this article and am requesting a re-review in hopes it now meets Wikipedia's guidelines. When you review it again, please let me know if there is any specific part of the article that needs amending and I will change it according to your direction.
Hrosato (
talk) 11:59, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Hrosato (
talk)
11:59, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you!!! Hrosato ( talk) 13:57, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969!
Please let me know why my addition (11:21, 6 April 2015) was reverted.
What was wrong?
85.197.21.89 (
talk)
13:05, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
<ref>
</ref>
tags not allowed?
Because you've been reverted,
this SPI might interest you. Thanks,
Poeticbent
talk
14:54, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
You said that there "is a definite argument to be made that the sources (at least some of them which were affected by the content removal) are not unreliable". Can you please elaborate on which sources you are referring to, and why you say they are reliable - be it here or at the article talk page? If that's the case, I clearly have been operating at a standard which is too high, and there are plenty of articles which will warrant changes to include the lower standard sourcing. Ncmvocalist ( talk) 17:17, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
I have asked a question at teahouse. But I would like to know third person's view-- Cosmic Emperor ( talk) 01:19, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
I am unsure as to why the V-Dem Institute is not worthy of a wikipedia article. I have included references and attached a link to the webpage.
ValeriyaMechkova (
talk)
13:10, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello. I am a total newbie to writing WP articles, though of course I have used the service countless times. Thank you for reviewing my recent submission Charles Ernst Scharlau. When I submitted it, just yesterday, I was under the impression that I would have days, even weeks, before it was reviewed. So unwisely I planned to research how to make certain improvements to it in the interim, rather than waiting to submit. One planned improvement was to change the name of the article from "Charles Ernst Scharlau" to "Charles E. Scharlau". Although the individual's German middle name was indeed Ernst, the anglicised name he actually used is obscure, and all references to him that I've discovered indicate he went by "Charles E. Scharlau". This name change will also fix at least one "red link" on another page without having to edit the other topic.
Can the name of the article still be changed without too much effort? If so, can you point me in the right direction for accomplishing the change?
Again, thank you for your help.
KE5JK ( talk) 13:45, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
You may find the conversations here and also here relevant. I see you declined it for lack of notability as well. Fiddle Faddle 14:56, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969 - thank you for editing my article "BaFa' BaFa' - Cross Cultural/Diversity Simulation" and for the suggestions about releasing the copyright from this article:
http://www.simulationtrainingsystems.com/history-bafa-bafa/. I have followed the instructions about releasing the copyright to Wikipedia and posted the suggested note at the bottom of the article "The text of this webpage “History of BaFa’ BaFa’ – A Cross Cultural / Diversity /Inclusion Simulation” is available for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts)."
As per your suggestion I will resubmit the article. Please let me know if I need to do anything else. Again I appreciate your help. Sincerely Mgshirts Mgshirts ( talk) 19:29, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Mgshirts ( talk) 19:29, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Greetings! I am new to submitting to WikiPedia, and have been trying to get a living person bio published for a man named Jayme Illien, who is the founder of the International Day of Happiness. I am not sure if I have taken the right approach in my previous submissions. For instance, it may be more appropriate as a 'stub' rather than an 'article.' I'm really not sure what method to take in submitting this bio and would really appreciate some help!
As a reference, please visit /info/en/?search=Mark_Williamson. This is about the length (perhaps even shorter) of the article I would like to submit. It does not have any references at all, only one external link (which appears to be broken). If I wanted to publish something like this, simply to give credit where it is due in acknowledging Mr. Illien as the UN adviser who conceived of the IDoH, how should I go about that? Again, any help would be greatly appreciated! Thank you.
EDIT: Sorry, here is the link to the article in question - /info/en/?search=Draft:Jayme_Illien - thanks!
Juniperusco ( talk) 23:30, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi again and thanks for the very fast reply. Can you advise me on how to improve the article so that it achieves the necessary standards?
Provide more references that show the importance of the subject?
ValeriyaMechkova (
talk)
07:37, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
User: Ramanhome Article: /info/en/?search=Draft:Thiru_Narayana_Iyengar
Hi Ramanhome - You still have to remove the raw links. I removed one to give you an example. Also, that paragraph should have a citation which verifies the facts it includes.
The citations themselves are still in Tamil, not English. Again, I'm not talking about the underlying articles, but the footnotes in this article have to be in English.
The Literary work section needs a lot more citations (same reason I just cited above).
But on the whole, MUCH better! Nice job so far. Let me know when you've made the above changes and I'll take another look.
Onel5969
Hi Onel5969
Thanks a lot for your detailed help and guidance. Based on your suggestions, i have changed all the things that you had requested in your previous post as stated above. Please check the draft and let me know if i can resubmit.
Thanks Raman Ramanhome ( talk)Ramanhome — Preceding undated comment added 09:44, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969 -
Thanks for your feedback on the article draft - you noted it was a paraphrasing issue, and I have tried to make changes in line with your suggestions, focusing on the sections for the header and consultancy, which you pointed out were too similar (in a paraphrase sense) to a source article. Would you be able to take a look at the article again? I have redrafted it and was hoping you could take a look so I can resubmit it? Many thanks for your advice and help!
/info/en/?search=Draft:Rebecca_Harding
Ilovetomatoes321 Ilovetomatoes321 ( talk) 10:39, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
I am requesting a re-review by the esteem reviewer(s) because the articles had been improvised based on the reviewers' comments hence it is cited accordingly. Moreover, the nominee had achieve many recognition(citation listed), award(citation listed), publication(references listed), experience in diverse discipline of research(citation listed) and had many pages cited his name in Google search (kindly search "khalisanni") regardless to his young ages. Thus, I would like to thanks the reviewer for his suggestion and hopefully, the article can be accepted as a part of Wikipedia sources. I believe it would helps the users to retrieve the nominee concise information (early life, achievements, etc) with references through esteem Wikipedia page without Googling many website. Thank you
Khalisanni khalid (
talk)
15:57, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your kind assistance.
Some time ago I uploaded Morosanu's picture from his personal webpage http://mathematics.ceu.edu/people/gheorghe-morosanu and put it in the right place. Unfortunately, it was removed after a while for copyright reasons.
The picture is available to the public without any restriction. His institution wanted to have a picture there. There is no copyright issue !!!
Could you please upload it from http://mathematics.ceu.edu/people/gheorghe-morosanu and insert it into his wiki page ?
Thank you, ivamanu — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivamanu ( talk • contribs) 17:04, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Who would have thought that one space could cause such problems? People are having trouble find the page because it is R. T. instead of R.T. Also most people know him as Skip. So I want to change the title to the following: R.T. "Skip" Wallen
I have never changed the title of an existing article so hopefully you can help me with this. cheers, from Down Undah, Reefswaggie ( talk) 01:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
how about this? put in a redirect if someone looks for Skip Wallen ? is that possible? Reefswaggie ( talk) 23:26, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
user name: Yatin Rewale article: /info/en/?search=Draft:Jayantilal_Gada Hello - My Article Draft:Jayantilal Gada has been rejected after review, with the Expert's feedback that This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. The feedback seems very general and I would like to amend and resubmit, but would like more specifics in order to do so.Please tell me what changes i have to do to get this article accepted.Now I added more references about person from news papers and others web cites .I Also improved my Article .Please help me thank you Yatin Rewale ( talk) 10:34, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
I have added best reliable resources to justify my article. Please review my article again and do let me know.
AB (
talk)
12:22, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969 - I sent you the following message on March 16. I see that you have replied to messages before and after my message, but you have not replied to my message. I have copied it below and would greatly appreciate a response since I think that we have established the required notability to publish the article for the reasons explained below. Thank you !
16:53:03, 16 March 2015 review of submission by 24.13.237.93[edit] 24.13.237.93 (talk · contribs) Draft:Kol Hadash Humanistic Congregation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
I don't understand why the submission for Kol Hadash Humanistic Congregation was declined. The congregation is "notable" both as the "oldest and largest Humanistic Jewish congregation in Illinois" and for its rabbi emeritus being "the first Humanistic rabbi in Illinois." There are citations to articles ABOUT the congregation (not just a passing reference) in two different editions of the Chicago Tribune (Jan 13, 2008 and Sept 15, 2014), the Daily Herald (Dec 23, 2009), and WBEZ radio (July 16 2014).
Wikipedia has published articles about other Jewish congregations that have almost no citations or special distinction. See the links below:
1. Congregation Solel in Highland Park, Illinois - This article has almost no references, and none of the three references cited are independent, third-party references like a newspaper. The article was printed asking for additional submissions. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congregation_Solel
2. North Shore Congregation Israel in Glencoe, Illinois – This article has only two references, one of which is just a “dictionary and sourcebook,” and the other is a reference to the synagogue’s building. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Shore_Congregation_Israel
3. Temple Beth El in Madison, Wisconsin – This article has NO citations at all. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_Beth_El_(Madison,_Wisconsin)
4. Temple Beth El in San Antonio, Texas – This article has only one citation, and not for anything that makes them “notable” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_Beth-El_(San_Antonio)
5. Temple Beth El in Great Neck, New York – No citation for anything other than its location. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_Beth-El_(Great_Neck,_New_York)
6. Beth Shalom in Frederick, Maryland – Nothing notable about it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beth_Sholom_Congregation_(Frederick,_Maryland)
I would appreciate any explanation or specific instruction that would enable me to edit the article and have it approved for publication.
Thank you!
24.13.237.93 ( talk) 14:38, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
I appreciate you taking the time to go over the proposed changes to the Mitchell Kriegman. In my draft article, you should know that all of the references are in the References section (Reflist|ref=), I use shortcuts in the body of the article to reduce the clutter and it helps me avoid duplicate references. Kriegman is a nice guy and he has refrained from editing his article for many years, now as a novelist, he'd like to have his film career documented and have an article without banners in the header. Thanks Again! 009o9 ( talk) 20:44, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Wow, a lot of activity on this page. Just wanted to thank you again for agreeing to go over the updates for Mitchell Kriegman. I'll see if I can spend a couple of hours this evening in AfC, maybe find a worthy article that can be helped along. Thanks again! 009o9 ( talk) 02:27, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Dear Editor Onel5969, I appreciate your time and effort in review and acceptance of “Brooks Benedict” biography page as an addition to Wikipedia. Similarly, I am grateful for your kind note, in reference to which, I thought that I had directly submitted the page. Also, I am not very familiar with the rating system. However the page that I submitted contains historical references important to him and the topic. They are not found in any other collective. Please note that all that was known about him as reported in public databases did not surpass 3-4 sentences. Thereby his page at Wikipedia is the most comprehensive, and importantly underlines his education, military service, and challenges in an acting career spanning silent movies to television. In this respect, I would be grateful if you could advise me as to how further improve this page so that it reaches a level higher stub. I understand that stub articles can be deleted. Also, I am curious to see if I am credited with the creation of the page. Respectfully, M. Neshat, Ph.D. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mneshat ( talk • contribs) 23:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
User: Ramanhome Article: /info/en/?search=Draft:Thiru_Narayana_Iyengar
Hi Onel5969
Thanks a lot for all your help. As requested by you, have resubmitted for review.
Regards Raman
Hi Ramanhome - yup, looks good. Resubmit and let me know. Onel5969 (talk) 15:47, 9 April 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramanhome ( talk • contribs)
Hey Onel5969: A few days back I posted a proposed revision as a question for you under "copyvio" reversion of Paradise Valley additions, above -- have not heard back though I see other action on your talk page -- so maybe you didn't see it? If it's appropriate, I'd appreciate your feedback on this proposed revision -- this process occasioned quite a bit more useful research and a much better submission --thanks for that! and hope you agree. WcwkS15 ( talk) 02:11, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
I have noticed that you reverted some valuable edits here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=MIME&diff=637466320&oldid=637421367
Please undo your revert.
Piotr Jurkiewicz ( talk) 02:38, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi
My submission was declined by you " Onel5969". I still got the same message I got earlier on after editing and resubmitting the article.
I want to learn please. What exactly do you want me to do so that the article will be accepted.
Here's the link:
/info/en/?search=Draft:Joshua_Letcher
Thanks
Hilary Umeoka — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hilumeoka2000 ( talk • contribs) 03:20, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for taking the time to review my page ( /info/en/?search=Draft:Alok_Nanda_%26_Company_Communications_Pvt._Ltd.)
I was hoping you could shed some light on your feedback.
'refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources': My sources include CNBC, Forbes India and Economic Times. Since the subject is an Indian advertising firm, I've also included sources like CampaignIndia and Afaqs, that are known and respected by the Indian advertising community. Could you specify why these sources are unacceptable so that I may improve my article?
'This submission appears to read more like an advertisement...articles need to be written from a neutral point of view': I have avoided what might be considered as 'peacock terms'; there are, however a few instances where I've used words taken directly from sources. For instance: 'India is the fastest-growing luxury market' from CNBC.com. Do you object to words/phrases like these or is there something else you'd like me to change?
I'd appreciate your help. Thothbubble ( talk) 07:06, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
As per your suggestion, i have added three more reliable resources to justify my article.
Kindly, review my article again.
AB ( talk) 07:21, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Good Morning:
Your long list of Wikipedia articles is most impressive. And although I am from the deep South, I do like New York. Having been there several times, I enjoyed each visit. Hanging on my wall is a chalk drawing of my daughter and me from a sidewalk artist in Manhattan.
Now, for my article on Von Lombard. My last two rejections were over notability. I truly respect Wikipedia's standing in this regard, yet it does seem there is a great deal of latitude on what an editor determines to be notable.
Please consider:
Von Lombard has written four books. VL has baptized over 1000 people in water. Only one percent of pastors in America have baptized that many people. VL has been published in one magazine and one journal. VL has been on Fox News and had his own TV and radio programs.
There are about a dozen third party references in the article at Von Lombard.
Can you plz reconsider your decision on notability? https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Draft:Von_Lombard&redirect=no
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crimsontidealabama ( talk • contribs) 10:49, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Dear reviewer
Please read the clarifications that I sent regarding the article that you rejected
Thank your very much for your attention
Nolberto Munier
User name: reinumrub Password: Valencor — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.90.148.96 ( talk) 12:43, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello,
re: /info/en/?search=Draft:Ilan_Rechtman
Thank you for your review of the article, I was google-ing information on artists who had played with Brazilian orchestras and decided to make this article. I used the article on Sonia Rubinsky ( /info/en/?search=Sonia_Rubinsky) as a basis for comparison. I have added citations to Mr. Rechtman's recorded work and to the recent broadcast of his music on the US TV Show Dancing with the Stars.
Thank you,
user: AKonanur
Hi, thank you so much for reviewing the Jo Loves draft page. Please could you clarify where you identify peacock terms, is this av example: "The reaction from the industry was instantaneous"? All other sentences are written factually without positive adjectives or superlatives. Is the use of Jo's quotes the reason for decline? Many thanks, would love to make this work.
Teriw ( talk) 06:18, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I want to ask for your advise on article about TV show. I initially write this info to be put on their filmography. However other editors said that we can't put long details about a show on filmography article. There are 2 main reality show and I actually think it will be better if we can combined it in one page instead of two separate articles but I'm not too sure if we can do that here. Here is the draft. Kindly need your advise. Thank you so much :) Sonflower0210 ( talk) 07:00, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi! I know that you do great work in this area. Nevertheless, I'm going to stick my neck out and ask you to be a little more careful in what you accept. Lee Harris Pomeroy was created by an editor called Leeharrispomeroy; that suggests that there is a serious conflict of interest problem there at the very least. WP:COI, WP:AUTO apply; it should probably be speedy-deleted as G11, unambiguous advertising. Conflict-of-interest editors and would-be autobiographers are supposed to be strongly discouraged from editing related articles; one way of discouraging them might be to decline their drafts. Rather more worrying is PREMature (TV Series), where the copyvio blanking was removed by the article creator; just for future reference: that is never acceptable. If should ever happen to see it again, please restore the copyvio template or revert to the last version before it was removed. Many thanks for all you do, best regards, Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 15:06, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Onel5969
I do need your assistance. It may take some of your valuable time, but I really do need your help. You recently rejected my article on the artist Paluzzi. I have personally talked to the curator of a major museum in Los Angeles, who agreed with me that Rinaldo Paluzzi is considered to be a Notable American Abstract Expressionist artist. I do understand the need to establish the Notability of Paluzzi and include references; and I believe I have done so in my article.
But please explain something to me?
Since Paluzzi was an American Abstract Expressionist Artist, I examined the list of artists whose mature work related to the American Abstract Expressionist movement (see: /info/en/?search=Abstract_expressionism) (Note: 7.2 Other artists) and may I suggest my article on Paluzzi includes more information establishing his notability and references than do the articles on the following artists listed there: William Brice , Alexander Bogen (was neither significant nor American), Charles Ragland Bunnell, Edward Corbett, Lynne Mapp Drexler, Jean Dubuffet, Sam Gilliam, Joseph Glasco, JohnD. Graham, Stephen Greene, Gino Hollander, Frances Kornbluth, André Lansky, Michael Lowe, John Levee, Herbert Matter (he was not an Abstract Expressionist, he was a photographer and graphic designer), Seong Moy, Jan Müller, Pat Passlof, Earle M. Pilgraim, Aaron Siskind (a photographer who had little to do with the Abstract Expressionist movement), Ary Stillman, and Cora Kelley Ward. PLEASE look at the WIKIPEDIA articles on each of the above and explain why they have an article and Paluzzi does not?
By the age of 32, his work was already in major collections and being shown in major exhibitions. [1]
Also, may I suggest you look at the following:
http://www.javierbmartin.com/index.php/textos/535-obito-rinaldo-paluzzi
http://www.javierbmartin.com/index.php/pintores-javier-b-martin/222-rinaldo-paluzzi
Please go to: http://www.inwhiteriver.com/attractioncategory/public-art/ Scroll down to “Totem” and read the bio on Paluzzi. If that doesn’t establish his nobility and references more than all the artists listed in section 7.2 of the American Abstract Expressionist article, I don’t understand what will?
After taking the time to do what I have requested, please let me know exactly what needs to be added to my article for it to be included in WIKIPEDIA.
I am age 90.85 and may not live long enough to see my article in WIKIPEDIA.
With cordial regards, SirSwindon
Sirswindon ( talk) 19:31, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Joél Célestin Filsaime, is a well known musician as J-Pimp, with reliable natural resource on his music career. Can you re-review this draft article and accepted this article?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jo%C3%A9l_C%C3%A9lestin_Filsaime
I remind you that the criterion Speedy A7 only applies to people, organizations, organized events, and web content. It does not apply to concepts, or films, or any creative work. I am removing your tags, and I very strongly advise you not to do any further deletion tagging until you have carefully read WP:CSD and WP:Deletion policy. DGG ( talk ) 22:28, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
I just declined three pages you tagged with WP:CSD#A7. Please read the criterion more carefully. Ordinary films are not eligible for A7. Neither is a neologism.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 22:32, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Can you please copy edit this article's plot? I believe it is a bit improper and long. However read it carefully and make sure the plot's basic essence is not lost in translation (i may be junior to you, but call it my desperation.)
Pavanjandhyala (
talk)
05:04, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I've made a request for dispute resolution regarding the Moon Landing article. Just wanted to let you know :) LadyLeitMotif ( talk) 12:43, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
thank you for your help, apologies if i didn't do it correctly. was listening to a 1981 bbc radio doc about the ripper case, and truth be told was trying to 'crowbar' the fact that sutcliffe showed his friend his VD in the men's room. (yuck) the part of the page i was trying to edit said something like 'other analysis showed no proof that he went to prostitutes'. how should i have done it, if at all? thanks again for your help, hope you are well. feel free to delete this after reading/ response. :) Onemorebrando ( talk) 13:21, 12 April 2015 (UTC)chip
Hi,
Could you please tell me what data could help improve the page, will references form the following sites help? In addition to the references, I will be adding more content on the Pre School as well.
My username: Muthad Page: /info/en/?search=Kidoz_Montessori_and_Pre_School
Thank you! Muthad ( talk) 14:09, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
I am making a first time article submission on Wikipedia and we haven't hired any agency to do the same and hence have put up the entire article on my own. This is one of the most successful cultural festivals of Hyderabad (India) and the only festival that spans across 100 days in the entire country of India. Please let me know how do I go about the editing or please suggest if we have any professional help that I can ask for. You could google for the term HYDOURITE and see the kind of responses you get for the same; if that helps.
Hydourite (
talk)
06:28, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Even though I'm not the author of She-She-She Camps, I appreciate the time that you put into helping the author get the article into main space because I think the information it contains is very interesting. I wasn't involved as much as I wanted to be in helping to improve the article so at this time I was wondering if you could share with me some of the things that you still think need to be improved.
Hi, you edited and rejected the article with Regina E. Herzlinger. I created a usename TrentTrout59 AFTER the article was edited. Do you have any guidance for us? Dr. Herzlinger is one of the foremost health policy analysts in the United States, one of the most admired professors at Harvard Business School, the first woman to earn tenure on the faculty of Harvard Business School, and the author of numerous influential books and articles on health care. I think you're looking for references that aren't HBS websites.
Hi I was asked to provide inline references, this I did. I have waited 2 weeks and now rejected again. I hope you can provide a clue as to what is missing, I did what was asked. /info/en/?search=Draft:Guitar_pickup_potting Thanks The Naughty Badger ( talk) 16:33, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi and thanks, I have added two more inline citations and another video demonstrating the process. I would say that pickup potting is indeed notable and a very important aspect of guitar electronics and certainly not just an aside in the main category. I will certainly add further information and refernces to this article over time. The Naughty Badger ( talk) 09:04, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello! Thank you for your review and feedback. (And also for your nice note.) I am hoping that you could give me some more specific suggestions. About ten days ago, this article was declined for a similar reason, namely that I needed to add more inline citations. I wrote to that reviewer and asked him if he had any ideas about where I should put more citations. I explained that I had been trying to gauge how many citations to put in based on looking at articles about similar academics and using them as models. The two I had chosen were Nelson Lichtenstein (another faculty member at the same institution) and James T. Richardson (another sociologist). Based on those examples (they each only have two), I was afraid that I had actually put too many citations into mine as it is now, and I did not put even more in for fear of looking amateurish. In response, the reviewer said that upon considering my article again, he had concluded that he'd had "brain failure" when reviewing it the first time, and he put it back in the line to be reviewed again. So I did not end up getting any specific feedback as to where more citations might be effective. I'm wondering if you have any that might help me?
Thanks! :)
Lizseach (
talk)
18:49, 13 April 2015 (UTC)Lizseach
Lizseach ( talk) 18:49, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you, Onel5969! That was very helpful. I have revised now with the "more is more" philosophy in mind and resubmitted. I found it somewhat tricky: in order to assert aspects of notability as "facts," and thereby create opportunities to cite them, I was required to say things that felt less neutral. I hope I have managed to strike the right balance. Any further editing suggestions are welcome. Again, many thanks for your help. :) Lizseach ( talk) 07:19, 15 April 2015 (UTC)Lizseacg
Hi! I would like to discuss this edit.
I want to emphasize that sometimes red links are a good thing. Wikipedians want to encourage others to write contents at topics which don't yet have their articles. School districts in the United States have been shown to be notable, and this is a common outcome at AFD. This is especially so for the state of Missouri, where school districts are independent of municipal boundaries and have their own taxation departments. Every single Missouri school district should have a Wikipedia article, and removing redlinks to those topics impedes that goal.
Please don't remove redlinks of Missouri school districts. If you want to have something other than redlinks, please consider writing stubs for these school districts.
I am aware that one of the links points to the wrong target, so I'll hunt it and retarget the link.
Thank you, WhisperToMe ( talk) 14:28, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello ,
In your last message you said that everything was ok about my work ...
so i submit it but it's rejected again ???? i don't understand why
Regards
Bichetteln ( talk) 14:54, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Can you please perform a complete c/e on this article which i am aiming to take to GA status? Please let me know whether you are interested in doing so and if yes, please inform me before beginning the process.
Pavanjandhyala (
talk)
15:45, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing this submission. I am unclear on which of the references are considered unverifiable. All of the selected works are available online via the various journal webpages. The Google Scholar page shows a much larger research base than the selected references and all remaining references are independent of the article subject. Also, after reading the notability guidelines and reviewing many published articles about Dr. Marakas' peers in information research, I am unclear as to how to proceed to further establish notability. Most of Dr. Marakas' works are published in the premiere journals with his field. Would it help to include citation counts from Web of Science? He has been my research mentor for many years and I believe his notability within the field of information systems is beyond reproach. Please guide me in how to proceed to reach a successful publication.
Thanks in advance for any help you can provide. Gomegas ( talk) 15:56, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Gomegas ( talk) 15:56, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Upon reviewing and rejecting my draft you proposed moving this information to "List of surface-to-air missiles".
There are two main problems to this and I am currently looking for solutions.
1. MODERN. "List of surface-to-air missiles" attempts to encompass all of them in existence. My intended scope was relevant, moderns SAMs. Including all SAMs into the list would make the comparison cluttered, and inefficient.
2. By Country. "List of surface-to-air missiles" arranges them by country in alphabetical order. It makes it easy to see what one country has developed. Splitting SAMs up into range categories makes comparing missiles easy, but does not accomplish the task of "List of surface-to-air missiles".
Info Type | "List of surface-to-air missiles" name implicates | List of surface-to-air missiles accomplishes | My article |
---|---|---|---|
All encompassing history | Yes | Yes | No |
In a list format | Yes | Yes | No |
In a table format | No | No | Yes |
A Modern Scope | No | No | Yes |
Comparison | No | No | Yes |
Technical Data | No | No | Yes |
If there was an article named "modern SAMS" or "List of modern SAMS", I would merge without hesitation. There are plenty of articles about modern SAMS(on a case by case basis), but there is no all encompassing article. This is my attempt and making that article.
OK I will propose a new solution that you can critique: -Create an new article called "list of modern surface-to-air missiles" and then add in the comparison tables.
Then there is always the option of accepting my original article. I believe it would be unique article with a unique purpose. Whether its an article about a specific MANPADS, short range SAM, medium range SAM, long range SAM or ABM. My article will remove the need for all the "See also:"s at the end of these pages and reduce the clutter on Wikipedia by a lot. Brovich
Never mind, I fixed the typos in the title.
Thank you,
Brovich
Hi Onel, a colleague of mine asked me to take a look at this page they submitted and asked me to do what I can to edit it. Since I've done a couple of other wiki pages, they thought I might be better able to edit the page and get it up to standard. I would like to submit it by the end of the week, but thought I would check with you first to see if you have any suggestions.
The import of this page Silbermann is primarily his position in the Middle East Cancer Consortium (a stub page that I will also be updating shortly. I want to link to Silbermann's page, as I believe these should be two separate topics).
Your advice is greatly appreciated.
777desha777 ( talk) 17:34, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Onel5969. User:Ktscurria here, back from travels. Regarding /info/en/?search=Draft:Thomas_A._Nazario, they (Tom Nazario and his organization) understandably don’t want to give up their copyright. But if I rewrite the article such that the material objected to is no longer part, is that sufficient, or are there other problems with the material I’ve submitted? Ktscurria ( talk) 20:04, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing my article: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Draft:Cooper_Phillip
Unfortunately it wasn't accepted due to notability issues. I have created citations using 8 reliable sources. Just wondering what could be the problem. Are the sources are not reliable enough?
user name: Yatin Rewale article: /info/en/?search=Draft:Jayantilal_Gada Hello - I got expert feedback that This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. The feedback seems very general and I would like to amend and resubmit, but would like more specifics in order to do so.Please tell me what changes i have to do to get this article accepted.Now I added more references about person from news papers and others web cites.Jayantilal_Gada is one of the famous personality in bollywood industry.Many articles are published on him in news papers and other media.Please help me how can i solve this problem Yatin Rewale ( talk) 06:27, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969, Thanks for your review and for your time. I added many references as you suggested about Stefano Siragusa's new page. Can I do something to improve on the quality of this page? Kind regards, Arfidalocin
Hello Onel5969
this was your two last answer :
[User:Bichetteln|Bichetteln]] ( talk) 14:56, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
+ +
Bichetteln (
talk)
14:07, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
+ +
Bichetteln ( talk) 09:40, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Draft:Jacob_Whitesides
cleaned it up added solid sources please review Danandrewsreporter ( talk) 04:08, 16 April 2015 (UTC)Danandrewsreporter
How and why did you decide so quickly that the above was non-notable? She is a published author. It certainly wasn't advertising as I have no connection with the subject. Smokey TheCat 08:52, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello SmokeyTheCat,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Christelyn Karazin for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Onel5969 (talk) 21:06, 11 April 2015 (UTC) <<< Your entry on my talk page. Smokey TheCat 05:28, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
How can an artist who has a number one hit on Itunes be borderline? An artist in music can go no higher then #1. So we have a number 1 selling artist, 1.5 million twitter followers, in Billboard, Vogue, American Songwriter, and that is borderline? As far as cleaning up grammar...I am not going to invest anymore time in this article until it either gets a green light or a second review from someone with more realistic standards. In all do professionalism, few artists reach number one...in sales on Itunes. That is what makes someone noteworthy. Again, I see no real point of spending time cleaning this up if you are going to be unrealistic in the process of what defines notability.
On a side note this is part of the reason why I hate wikipedia...common sense states if someone reaches number one on the music charts then that is a clearly noteworthy accomplishment...
Hi Danandrewsreporter - Hi. You might pass the notability criteria, it's borderline. I'll let another editor take a crack at it, and see what they think. In the meantime, the article still has a slightly Non-neutral tone, and there are some formatting/grammar issues which need cleaning up. Onel5969 (talk) 15:28, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Danandrewsreporter (
talk)
15:47, 16 April 2015 (UTC)danandrewsreporter
You offered to assist me 10 days ago when I received a rejection notice. Finally, I now have a presentable edit. However, I am not able to resubmit for some unknown (to me) reason. My only writing is an attempt to update the bio of General Richard H Ellis. It is in my sandbox page. I recognize that I do not have full working knowledge of proper reference protocol, and for that, I ask your help. Thank you RubyJMDE ( talk) 20:32, 16 April 2015 (UTC)RubyJMDE
I have completely revised the last few sentences of the bio I would like to edit. Reference sources have been provided. It is now an accurate update for future generations. RubyJMDE ( talk) 20:45, 16 April 2015 (UTC)RubyJMDE
RubyJMDE ( talk) 20:45, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
10 days ago upon my first submission, I was not ready for the final edit. I now have completed it and given accurate references. When trying to resubmit, the edited sandbox does not allow me to finalize the changed edit. Can you provide help or guidance? RubyJMDE ( talk) 20:49, 16 April 2015 (UTC)RubyJMDE
You might want to keep an eye on this. It got out of hand the moment you accepted it. Fiddle Faddle 20:58, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing the article on Alexander Beridze. I have made revisions that I hope will satisfy the copyright concerns and I added a photo of him that was posted on Wikimedia. Wikiawesome also reviewed the article and suggested some changes which I have made. If there are any specific sections or sentences that you think are in need of revision, it would be a big help if you could identify those. I appreciate your help. AnnRos ( talk) 21:31, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Thanks for reviewing my article. I have read the guidelines but wonder if you could tell me what you think is the major reason it's rated a C and not above. My thoughts were, it's a bit rambly and the lead in could be crisper. Any suggestions?
Redilion (
talk) 22:33, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Redilion (
talk)
22:33, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, You very kindly reviewed my submission for a page to be created for my late Father who passed away last year. Unfortunately you denied my article on the basis that it appeared to infringe copyright. The article that has created the conflict was infact written by me - its just that the reporters who published Trevor's Bio never acknowledged that they were my words. I'd still like to try to create an entry for Trevor. He had an interesting life and made a significant contribution to Tourism and Cruising in Sydney a in Fiji. Given the amount of time Id have to invest in writing this getting the formatting correct, figuring out how Wiki works etc, I would therefore like to ask you if you could assist with publishing the article for me? I have volumes of information on Trevor, his life and contribution. Can I send these to you? Do you do this on a paid basis? If you are unable to help, can you recommend someone who might be able to assist me?
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Draft:Captain_Trevor_Haworth&action=edit&redlink=1
Look forward to hearing from you. Best regards, Anthony AnthonyHaworth ( talk) 02:33, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for helping out as I am getting started! MMSS4S ( talk) 06:04, 17 April 2015 (UTC) |
I'm not sure i understand all your answers :
about inline citations when you said he moved to Paris : do you mean i have to explain the reason ???
so i wrote a reason ....
About Reference : i added one link about his work with the French singer Sheila
and one article about CD of the French singer Serge Lama . His CD was succesfull and a new direction for his career . Yann Benoist is credited as arranger and composer on this CD
Bichetteln ( talk) 13:02, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Talimagnum ( talk) 18:32, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, My name is ivan. i have been requested by the son of Alfonso Valdés jr. to write a certain type of biography of his father in wikipedia. Same as his father Alfonso Alfonso_Valdés_Cobián and his daughter Camalia_Valdés he have been involved in a lot of relevant activities as i wrote on the bio. Alfonso Valdes III whos is his son is really confused by why the information he gave is not being taken in a relevant manner since, both his daughter and father got accepted. i really want to help him since i also belive he have been an important person in the industry of island of Puerto Rico.
Hello, I am not sure what other criteria to include for David R. Gastfriend, as it seems to me that he does fit the description, and the details included, for your guidelines of a notable person. Please advise as to how I can make this information more notable. Thank you 38.98.222.171 ( talk) 19:46, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I am at a loss how being a best selling author and having your books being picked up for film doesn't warrant being "notable." I have not referenced Riddle's personal website; I have used Amazon as a reference regarding his book sales, and have used independent sources regarding movie adaptations. What else can I do/reference? It seems strange that I could probably create a page for one of his books, or when the film comes out a page for the film, but I can't create a page for the one who created them? Please advise! Steven C. Price 21:33, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for the review of the article on Alexander Beidze. It was extremely helpful to see the link to the earwig copyvio detector to see the problem areas. I have made quite a few revisions and added some new references that I hope will work to make the article publishable. Could you please review it again? Thanks so much. AnnRos ( talk) 12:38, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your review and your subsequent suggestions. This is my first time using wikipedia to write an article and i did not follow the guidelines needed in citation. Kindly give me another chance to edit and make the article compatible to the guidelines as set by wikipedia. I would start the necessary editing of the whole document and looking forward to your further advice and suggestion please.
Cyberinfo24 ( talk) 13:41, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for approving my article on James B. Drew. Happy to say that I now have 4 articles on Wikipedia. I believe that you have been involved in all of them - my sincere thanks to you. My next goal is to get one of them ranked above Start Class. Buckmor54 ( talk) 16:03, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Articles For Creation Hard Work Barnstar |
For your solid hard work at the WP:AFC coalface Fiddle Faddle 17:28, 18 April 2015 (UTC) |
I made several revisions to avoid any paraphrasing of the references sources. Could you please review the article again? Thank you, AnnRos ( talk) 18:06, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
My article /info/en/?search=Draft:Military_Working_Dog_Teams_National_Monument was declined by you stating it was not naotable. In fact, it is a US NATIONAL MONUMENT and there are dozens of articles about other US national monuments on wikipedia. It was extensively referenced including national media sources. What else is required? Why would a US National Monument not be notable when many others are? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akjayintx ( talk • contribs) 12:40, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deletion of article Janne Kyttanen
Hi, my article (Janne Kyttanen) was deleted for copyright infringement. I wrote the original copy which is featured on this designer's site (ie it is my own copyright). What can I provide as proof of this? Susanemma ( talk) 15:26, 19 April 2015 (UTC) Susanemma ( talk) 15:26, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Thank you for offering to assist with the article. I know Im sounding like a complete Philistine, however can you let me know how I can send you the info? regards, Anthony 58.162.130.101 ( talk) 21:48, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Dear Onel5969,
The following is a link to a dropbox which contains Trevors story and photos.
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/winoibi11x257jw/AABcSZhvh52z8gvUXlCVvc8pa?dl=0
Ive also indicated some further online links below which quote some of the information contained in the document in the dropbox.
http://www.expeditioncruising.com/2014/03/vale-trevor-haworth-am-master-mariner.html
Let me know if you need anything further Best regards, Anthony 58.162.130.101 ( talk) 07:47, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969!
I have a last question concerning my submission. I have read the notability-guidelines and I see how Mr. Rabe doesn't fit into those. You mentioned that we have written "Rabe became internationally well known ..." which suggests that there should be publications in news and media about him and his work. I was thinking about this and the problem here is that notability in this case is also meant as notability within a particular scientific community. A reliable(ish) criterion for this could be the h- and i10-indexes, which are quite high for Mr. Rabe. A problem with scientific work and its notability is, that it often takes decades to evaluate the actual use of research that has been done.
Regarding the publication in news and media: I have found the following, but this again is a very specific publication for scientists working in nano-technology. Nevertheless it is reporting a finding of Mr. Rabe, though it has an advertising character to it and it is not clear who has written the article: http://www.azonano.com/news.aspx?newsID=23930
I have also found several articles from german newspapers but I think those might not be relevant for the english version of wikipedia. If that is not the case, I'd be glad about a notification.
Best regards, pfeilers
Pfeilers ( talk) 10:14, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
The Morris Quinlan Experience
/info/en/?search=Draft:The_Morris_Quinlan_Experience — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeoTheDobermann (talk • contribs) 14:54, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969 Respectfully, I wrote before on 7th March, but it seems I didn't get an answer. Having read the notability guidelines for musical ensembles, it does appear that two of the criteria are met. Here's what I wrote to you earlier:-
/info/en/?search=Draft:The_Morris_Quinlan_Experience
You declined this article (3rd March 2015) on the grounds of not being sufficiently notable. However, I believe at least two of Wikipedia's notability guidelines are indeed met for this ensemble, as follows...
"1. Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself.[note 1] This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media, and television documentaries[note 2] except for the following: Any reprints of press releases, other publications where the musician or ensemble talks about themselves, and all advertising that mentions the musician or ensemble, including manufacturers' advertising.[note 3]
Works consisting merely of trivial coverage, such as articles that simply report performance dates, release information or track listings, or the publications of contact and booking details in directories."
Album reviews in The Times and Melody Maker, as well as the feature article in the Newcastle Journal were all independently written, and despite being unavailable online, are all verifiable.
"12. Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or TV network."
Does not the group's live appearance as guests on Ned Sherrin's Loose Ends programme on BBC Radio 4 (Saturday 11th August 2001) count here? It was a segment of approaching 10 minutes duration, during which Sherrin gave a lengthy introduction to the band, and talked further about them after their live performance of one of their pieces, all in front of a live audience. Most notably, the segment was repeated on the Loose Ends Pick Of The Year show at the end of 2001.
The band can not yet claim 'rotation' play for any of their releases, but they are regulars on Bob Harris's BBC Radio 2 Sunday Show (considered to be a very influential rock music programme, if not the most influential currently on UK radio), and indeed a playlist search shows they have received more Bob Harris plays than even (for instance) Kate Bush!!!
That said their most recent singe release 'Scarborough Fair' received multiple plays on the Radio 2 network, not just from Bob Harris.
BBC Radio 4 and BBC Radio 2 are major national radio networks in the UK.
One of the band's members, Dave Maughan, is well known as a record producer, having recorded and produced Mercury Music Prize nominated Little Black Numbers album by Kathryn Williams, who herself has guested on an MQE released track. Would it be helpful to this article if Dave Maughan had a Wikipedia entry?
Hoping you can reconsider the article...
LeoTheDobermann (talk) 16:29, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Question resubmitted 20th April 2015
LeoTheDobermann LeoTheDobermann ( talk) 11:53, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969,
Thank you very much for your comments on the draft article I submitted to Wikipedia ( /info/en/?search=Draft:Karnabharam_by_Bhasa) a few months back. I have removed the overkill ( :) ) of references in one place, have distributed them across sections and have also included two new ones.
You have an impressive profile! Best wishes, margie — Preceding unsigned comment added by Margieparikh ( talk • contribs) 17:17, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Resubmitting!! This is a fun, learning experience! Thank you! PattiMoly99 ( talk) 19:29, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Good Afternoon! Thank you for your note about my submission. Please help me understand the reason for the decline. I used the Phoenix Nuclear Labe Wikipedia as my template and was as factual using non-expressive language. Any pointers would be welcome. I will re-read the Articles of Notability. The only medical isotope production facility for North America is shutting down (NRU), and we will step in as that does shut down to provide Medical Isotope's, we are working with the US NRC and DOE. I thought I couldn't write more than I did, but if I can in a neutral voice I will! Thank you for your help!
PattiMoly99 ( talk) 17:22, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you OneL5969! Everyone is so helpful here!! One of our Nuclear engineers found some scientific articles written about SHINE by National Labs! So everyone here is pitching in! Thank you again. Lots of reading and trying to understand are in my future today!
PattiMoly99 ( talk) 14:32, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Onel!
Thanks for reviewing my article. I have understood that it is not really ready yet in order to be a real article for Wikipedia.
Anyway, I have inserted the following at the end:
This article on a United States punk rock band is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
Would it work this way?
Thanks!
Angel Spent ( talk) 19:15, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Dear Onel5969,
I hope this finds you well. I am surprised you deleted my article, which was intended to be a stub to allow others to include more information. The reason given concerns notability. However, I would like to stress that the sources used are enough for a short stub. I included three references, none of which was directly related to the subject. Te two books are from reliable publishers; one of them is available on Google Books (snippet view); the other source is a publicly available archive search of the Abbey Theatre (Ireland's National Theatre). I would like to think that these sources are enough. I have recently been introduced to Wiki editing and was hoping to use my expertise to create new articles and to cover some gaps in Irish literary history. I am discouraged and disappointed by what happened, and I hope you would reconsider. All best
irabarbanel — Preceding unsigned comment added by Irabarbanel ( talk • contribs) 19:40, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your response to my latest submission. This is my third submission and I still don't understand what is wrong with it. I have included several independent verifiable sources about the company and I have reviewed several of our competitors in Australia that have Wikipedia entries. I have closely matched the style of information they provided and their reference approach. I have also revieewed your guidelines about the golden triangle but I still don't know what I have to do. Could you please give me some guidance. Do I need more references? Do I need more information on the company? eg We are the fastest growing life insurance company in Australia. What do I need to include to show that we are 'notable'? Thank you in advance for any assistance you can provide. Maplepond ( talk) 22:00, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
I wanted to write regarding your rejection of my recent wiki submission for Spinnaker International.
/info/en/?search=User:Spinnaker-UK/sandbox#Intelligent_Cash_Protection
I am a little disappointed that the article has been rejected on the grounds of lack of notability. This is a unique company in the UK, operating in a very select environment, this alone should be notable.
There are 6 reference links, 5 of which refer directly to industry bodies and/or news articles pertaining to this technology.
Furthermore, an almost identical article for a competitor company has been approved and is on Wikipedia EN & FR today:
/info/en/?search=Oberthur_Cash_Protection
I have purposefully changed the structure of my submission, in the hope it would be published.
Would you be able to take a look at this article again and see if it can be published?
Many thanks
Richard Sokl (Spinnaker-UK) Spinnaker-UK ( talk) 13:41, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for notifying me about your comments on Draft:Philip Robert Presants article. I have stripped out unnecessary and possibly 'informal' text or commentary. Hoping it is now acceptable? JulianHeyes ( talk) 19:22, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Onel55969!
I made an article of an actor but your review of it says it needs more notability stuff, wondered if you could give me some guidance on what would be suitable? its my 1st article so i want it to work! thanks, Mishmash5
Mishmash5 (
talk)
20:31, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Articles for Creation barnstar | |
Whenever I go around AfC, I'm bound to see something reviewed by you. Thank you for your prolific contributions to the wikiproject! Winner 42 Talk to me! 00:05, 22 April 2015 (UTC) |
Hello - thanks for your review. Our updates are complete. Apologies - my staff assumed my web articles and credits spoke for themselves. But we understand the need for corroboration. Please review the new "Recognition" section. Simply put, one does not write for the Oxford press or curate exhibits in public museums by being "un-notable". Thanks for your time. Gregg Miner 66.133.207.13 ( talk) 00:46, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
66.133.207.13 ( talk) 00:46, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
To parse the basic definition a bit: substantive treatment means not just mere mention but real content about the subject, which can be used to verify detailed statements about it. Independent, third party sources means that the sources cited should be completely unconnected to the subject. Reliable sources are those with a reputation for checking the facts, editorial oversight and accuracy – so not some unknown persons on blog or random websites, not Facebook or Linkin, not the subject's own website or any connected to them, not press releases, but books published by major publishing houses, newspaper articles, magazine write-ups, treatment in peer-reviewed scholarly journals and websites that meet the same requirements as reputable print-based sources, etc.
You have not demonstrated the existence of such sources. The draft already notes some of this in its reviews. The recognition section you talk about above does not help. First, articles should be made up of prose paragraphs exploring the topic, not long lists of accomplishments or credits. This article has one sentence of prose followed by lists. Encyclopedia articles are not directories or résumés. The recognition section lists other Wikipedia articles which is useless. Wikipedia is itself not a reliable source but user generated content and citation to other articles is circular. Everything else is mere mentions, all in a section which doesn't belong in the first place. All this is not to say the sources we want don't exist and the type of writing we seek can't be accomplished, but it's distinctly lacking from this draft. A proper article would strip out 90% of the list material, all of which reads as promotional and résumé fodder, and would instead have a few paragraphs of prose with reliable sources cited. To give you an example of some sources that might help, possibly this and this. Neither would be enough to sustain an article – I don't know if enough exist to sustain an article – but those are far more in the realm of the types of sources we're looking for.-- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 11:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Just typing that name on google alone will show you how notable the man is.
You may also want to look into this article in the scholar library http://www.naulibrary.org/dglibrary/admin/book_directory/Thesis/9940.pdf
75.134.126.188 ( talk) 02:49, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your answer ..
I try to understand what you mean so i added some détails in the Contents about " Biography"
and "References"
Regards
Bichetteln ( talk) 12:21, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=User_talk:Klara_cabi#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_GODAN_.28April_21.29
Hi,
I'm writing in about the GODAN draft I did. Just to let you know, I had GODAN send the appropriate copyrights to your copyright department by email. Can you check, please? They cc'd me in so I know it has been sent.
Thanks,
Klara — Preceding unsigned comment added by Klara cabi ( talk • contribs) 12:39, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello! I am looking for advice on what to change in order for my article to be accepted. Nearly every piece of information is substantiated from external/independent source. Could you give me a concrete example of something that I should take out or write differently?
Thank you! Fiona
Fboyd20 ( talk) 14:39, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Hallo. I can make some contributions to subjects related with the study of subatomic particles: deep-inelastic scattering, Quantum chromodynamics, the structure of the proton and so on. For example, the BFKL equation is a missing link of the article about Lev Lipatov (al least). So, I started with article about BFKL. OK, I added link to independet reference, to Particle Data Group. I do not know more "reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject". Could you explain me briefly, what do you expect? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.20.41.39 ( talk) 15:22, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello you were kind enough to review the Wikipedia Post Betty Lane, and further promote it to start class. Since then I have gotten permission to add images of works by Betty Lane to Wikimedia, as well as clippings and exhibition catalogs. Do you think the entry is at C on the Wikipedia Quality scale? Thank you for your feedback, -- 1offby ( talk) 03:00, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Onel5969--very happy to see the C quality rating. Thanks again for your work on the project.-- 1offby ( talk) 00:38, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Archiwriter ( talk) 14:10, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello,
I made edits to this article 10 days ago, including a longer list of sources that point to the notability of the subject, including two documentary films, several academic books both by and about the subject, and an obituary in the most important German cultural newspaper (Die Zeit). I have also included a link to her German Wikipedia page. Please let me know if these edits are sufficient or if something else is required.
Many thanks, Daniela
Thank you and it's really nice of you to help me
i think now i understand specially about footnotes
tell me if it seems ok for you or if i'm on the good way
Regards
Bichetteln ( talk) 16:17, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
I don't understand what that means "an encyclopedia format"? Did yoy need more references?
75.111.82.26 ( talk) 20:20, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969,
I am only here to help, I've done a few articles in the past to try and help East African Artists understand what Wikipedia was about and now I am back. My new article /info/en/?search=Draft:Meaku_%28Musician%29 was declined by you and I understood, I made some changes and added some more reliable sources. If you can please reevaluate it, I would be grateful.
Thank you
-- Hemdee31 ( talk) 20:21, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
PS: How rude of me... Thank you for all the work that you do and taking time to look over our articles.
I don't understand what that means when you say you want my article in a encyclopedia format and something about peacocks. Did you want more references? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.111.82.26 ( talk) 20:23, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I think you were too hard on the draft Karola Bloch -- you declined it even though one of the cited references is a book held by a number of libraries that is exclusively about Bloch. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 20:26, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
I'm getting in touch to learn more about a recently declined page submission for the Learning Technologies Group.
It's my first time adding a page to wikipedia, so I'm not too sure how best to improve it in order to get the page made live, can you provide some feedback on - why exactly the page is declined - how far away the page is from being accepted - what would you be looking for in the page to get it accepted.
I had based the page on other AIM listed companies (such as this : /info/en/?search=Daisy_Group), so I would like to know what you think I should do in order to get the page accepted. I had considered possibly adding a section on the board of directors, as they are well known investors/ directors of other companies... or was the page declined in it's current state because of another reason - citations maybe?
Anyway, I'm all ears on this, I will be creating pages for each company within the group once the LTG page is accepted, so would like to be able to improve how I'm creating the pages in order to ensure I can get them accepted with little trouble.
Look forward to hearing back, kind regards JakeStory ( talk) 08:29, 24 April 2015 (UTC) JakeStory
Hello Onel5969 and thanks for reviewing the page. Are there particular elements of the draft that read like an advertisement and I should look to revise? Thank you!
Fashionista888 ( talk) 10:20, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi there. . . you reviewed a recent submission I made for a french horn player named Fred Fox ( /info/en/?search=Draft:Fred_Fox) and rejected it based on notability issues. I wonder if you might be able to give me any more specific feedback on why the page doesn't meet the notability guidelines. Any advice would be much appreciated! Thank you. Pitneyj ( talk) 14:42, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969 and thanks so much for reviewing my draft. I saw that you declined it on grounds that it read like an advertisement and I was hoping you could point out the specific areas that were of concern? Thanks again really appreciate your help
Slainte12 (
talk)
17:55, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi. You rejected my article for lack of sufficient resources/notability. I've fleshed it out with a couple more sources (that aren't from the Press-Democrat). If you have a moment, could you take a look and let me know if anything else needs to be fixed or if these were sufficient? /info/en/?search=Draft:Nagasawa_Kanaye Thank you. Fuzchia ( talk) 18:54, 24 April 2015 (UTC)Fuzchia
Hi there Onel5969. Ok, I know that he is not that famous, but he will be!!! /info/en/?search=Draft:Muhammed_Emin_%C3%96zt%C3%BCrk
Can you reconsider this article!
Thanks!!!
Sintiminti — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sintiminti ( talk • contribs) 22:57, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments. I've tried to answer all the viewers but last time didn't get any response but and the viewer (Vchimpanzee) copied my answer, so I assumed that my answer was accepted. I'll do as many adaptations as needed in the article in order to follow the rules. Will you be kind enough to respond to my last post in this page?
Here is my last answer from this page:
Hi Vchimpanzee,
Re Fishelov's notability: according to the list of criteria specified in "Wikipeida: Notability (academics)" Fishelov definitely meets the first two criteria: 1. Fishelov's work has made significant impact in his scholarly discipline, i.e. literary studies. His book Metaphors of Genre is widely discussed and cited by scholars working in the field: Google-Scholar counts more than 130 citations of this book, much above the average of scholarly books in that field. It is no coincidence that the article on "Genre studies" on Wikipedia devotes a significant part of its section on "Generic Conventions" to present Fishelov's contribution to that field. 2. Fishelov's book Samson's Locks won the first Bahat Prize. The Bahat Prize is a prestigious Israeli national award for a scholarly, non-fiction book and many Israeli scholars in the Humanities and the Social Sciences compete for that prize. Moreover, Fishelov has also made a substantial impact outside academia in his academic capacity, hence he also meets criterion #7: based on his reputation as a literary scholar Fishelov was invited to chair the committee appointed by the Israeli Ministry of Culture and the Jerusalem municipality, to award the prestigious Yehuda Amichai Prize in poetry. Furthermore, the numerous reviews and essays Fishelov published in the literary supplements of three national Israeli newspapers made a significant impact outside academia. Note also the important role he played in introducing to Israeli readers to several classical works of modern English literature (e.g. Robinson Crusoe) by writing comprehensive afterword to their Hebrew translations.
Let me also mention the fact that Fishelov was invited to teach at several distinguished universities, including UC Berkeley, University of Chicago, Columbia University and EHESS in Paris. Perhaps this last fact, in and of itself, does not fall exactly into the list of criteria listed in "Wikipedia: Notability (academics)", but it is definitely another indication of his reputation as a leading scholar in the field of literary studies.
Re Fishelov's books: I elaborated a bit on the content of Fishelov's books and briefly described several reviews in order to illustrate his contribution to literary studies both in Israel and abroad. If you want me to shorten or to change that part, please let me know. Davidgute ( talk) 05:44, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
the article is rejected for the reason of references .. unfortunately this 1000 year old temple in India do not have anything written on internet, hence I was trying to add information on this beautiful temple, please guide me how to add references if they are not available at all ? ?Unfortunately many old temples in India like this are no documentation by government authorities too !
Thank you Mahesh Pathak ( talk) 12:27, 25 April 2015 (UTC)Mahesh Pathak
I don't understand why you declined my article for Watch What U Wish... In regards to Notability because I checked the qualifications for an Album to be Notable on the following page --> Wikipedia:MUSIC and it has passed TWO of the requirements. The two that my article passed are as follows;
The two published works are HipHopDX and Faygoluvers which both have NOTHING to do with the artists who made the album.
And it has also passed;
The chart it appeared on was Billboard's Top 25 Heatseakers. It doesn't get any bigger and more notable than Billboard as far as Charts are concerned.
So please re-review my article and consider accepting it for creation. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CECB:5060:75C2:28BF:C45F:D8E7 ( talk) 17:11, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969!
I posted that article on the french wikipedia (with some help). But the french wikipedia isn't working exactly as this one obviously. So I would definitely appreciate your help for my article. I'm kinda lost.
/info/en/?search=Draft:Robert_Gbian.
Merci beaucoup!
-- Afiavi2014 ( talk) 18:36, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Dear One:
First of all, I hope you are having a great weekend. The reason I'm writing is because you had rejected an article draft I had made on a Mexican TV conductress from Monterrey whose name is Michelle Gonzalez. The reason I was given is that this person is not notheworthy enough to have an article on Wikipedia, which I don't believe is the case. I have worked on this draft and added more sources than it initially had when you first reviewed it. I don't know if it would be possible for you or another editor to look at it and give me anymore suggestions as to how to further improve it in order to get it published. Thank you in advance for your invaluable help. This is the link to my most current draft on this person: /info/en/?search=User:OmarIsahuCorral/sandbox#Grace_Michelle_Gonz.C3.A1lez_T.C3.A1mez
OmarIsahuCorral ( talk) 01:19, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
A number of our competitors already have pages approved on Wikipedia. We feel that we have as much history and interest for readers as they do to justify a wikipedia page. I have amended the opening paragraph, and would be interested to know which bits the editor felt were too much like an advert so that I can amend these too? Wherever possible, I have referenced external journal articles that relate to the research undertaken by the company in the development of its products as external links to verify the credentials of the page.
Many thanks for your help and look forward to hearing from you soon
Katie
Dartex123 (
talk)
07:41, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
Just dropping you a message to see if my draft is now ready to be published? Would be great if it could be, as many of my professional contacts are requesting that we have a wikipedia page on Romail.
I have inserted the link to the draft, it would be much appreciated if you could have a look at it.
/info/en/?search=Draft:Romail_Gulzar
Kind Regards
Immie — Preceding unsigned comment added by Romg10 ( talk • contribs) 08:18, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your answer
i have done some corrections in "Réference" is that you talk about in your last message ????
tell me about ..
if it seems ok next time i think i will submit again???? What do you think
Best regards
Bichetteln ( talk) 14:06, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
My article on Onissim Goldovsky was rejected due to insufficient footnotes. I placed additional footnotes in the indicated places and resubmitted for review. I have not heard back. Are there additional problems?
PalmerWolf ( talk) 15:41, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello,
I'm creating an article on the company "Education at Work." It has been declined twice due to it sounding "more like an advertisement." I'd like to know exactly what I can do to fix that issue because I've made numerous edits and ensured of its credibility with my references. At the moment, I'm just a little confused as to what your reasoning is and would like some insight.
Thanks, Mahmike7 ( talk) 19:00, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Bhimsworth ( talk) 19:37, 27 April 2015 (UTC) Hi OneL5969. I was wondering if you could provide me with insight on what changes I need to make towards my article to have it approved. I would appreciate any advice you can give me. Thank you. I would like the article to be approved, as it is for one of my classes and I am willing to make the required changes. Thank you for your time.
Hi there,
Can you please give me some feedback for my client Sfhome who has submitted an article for inclusion on Wikipedia that has been denied. Here is a link
/info/en/?search=Draft:David_Gardner
Thank you and Sincerely, 76.113.71.168 ( talk) 22:58, 27 April 2015 (UTC) Audrey Nadia Rubinstein
Hi there, Hope you are doing well. My client is getting ready to launch a large non-profit project that gives back to the community. His previous experience and notable past is that he is a cofounder of Ishares. His profile was rejected by Wikipedia and I would really appreciate any and all advice you have for resubmission.
Here is a link to the article: /info/en/?search=Draft:David_Gardner
Many thanks,
Audrey Nadia Rubinstein Sfhome ( talk) 23:15, 27 April 2015 (UTC) Sfhome ( talk) 23:15, 27 April 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sfhome ( talk • contribs) 23:02, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm finally getting around to revising and expanding the sandbox page for Saving and Preserving Arts and Cultural Environments ( /info/en/?search=User:Joyamerica/sandbox), which you reviewed and declined a bit ago. I'll be sure to have good sources for everything before resubmitting.
First question for ya: I'm not understanding how to get an image in the image box. Right now, it just shows the file-name "Slidshow-Seymour-2.jpg" -- Let me know if you can help!
Thanks, Jenn — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joyamerica ( talk • contribs) 00:40, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
user name: Yatin Rewale article: /info/en/?search=Draft:Jayantilal_Gada Hello - My Article Draft:Jayantilal Gada has been rejected after review, with the Expert's feedback .I would like to amend and resubmit, but would like more specifics in order to do so.Please tell me what changes i have to do to get this article accepted.Now I made some changes for improve my article.Please check and help me. Yatin Rewale ( talk) 10:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969, thank you for reviewing my article. would it be possible for you to help me make it appropriate for Wikipedia as I'm a little unsure on how to do this. Maybe you could give me some further advice in how to do this. thank you chris Christiannaps ( talk) 10:32, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Rêve En Vert was founded in 2013 by Cora Hilts and Natasha Tucker and was born from a blog that Hilts started during her Masters course in Environmental Politics and Sustainability. Tucker has a degree in Art History and an MA in Art and Politics, and spent a year working on an organic farm in Bermuda, which is where her love for sustainability stems from.[3] Together they were shocked at the realisation that the fashion industry - second only to energy - is the second worst polluting industry in the world,[4] and thus Rêve En Vert was born.
While studying for her masters in environmental politics and sustainability, Cora Hilts began a blog centering on ________ in _____. Natasha Tucker had developed an interest in sustainability while working on an organic farm. Tucker responded to Hilts blog, and when the two discovered that the fashion industry is the second worst polluting industry in the world (the foremost being the energy industry), they decided to form a company to attempt to address that situation. The result was the creation of Rêve En Vert.
Hanjush (
talk)
13:28, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
My draft on de:Jürgen Neffe: His biography on Einstein was not only published in the US, it was highly acclaimed. Shall I add more reviews on "Einstein - A biography". Further on he has developed de:Libroid, a new multimedia interactive ebook which, being multilingual, can also be read and consumed in English and was reviewed by English and American media (see there). What else is needed to make a person like him, who has lived and worked in the US as a correspondent for Der Spiegel, "notable". Thanks for your help! Hanjush Hanjush ( talk) 13:28, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for looking at the new page patrol and for commenting at Wikipedia_talk:New_pages_patrol#Proposal_for_a_.22wait.22_tag. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:45, 28 April 2015 (UTC) |
I do not understand what within my submitted article is considered copyright infringement. Please specify so I can make the proper changes.
Prreyes ( talk) 16:22, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I must've been looking at something else. Which sources are insufficient? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prreyes ( talk • contribs) 17:53, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi-
It is not clear to me how to modify this to meet the request of better references.
The page submission was an attempt to link this person to his name on the Guggenheim Fellowship awardee list on this page: /info/en/?search=List_of_Guggenheim_Fellowships_awarded_in_2010
and was modeled after similar awardee stub pages, e.g.:
/info/en/?search=C._Josh_Donlan
/info/en/?search=Christy_Anderson
There are many many pages like this, which seem to be made to complete the connectivity of the wiki Guggenheim Fellowship list to individuals. Indeed the Guggenheim award on its own appears to be enough to have a stub included.
Maxvs91 ( talk) 21:33, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi There! I saw you didn't approve the SkyTechSport page. Seen here: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Draft:SkyTechSport&redirect=no. I have no idea what else to change. I seriously have done everything people have told me and can't catch a break. ha Please advise what else you think I need to change. Thanks so much for your help! :) Alex at SkyTechSport ( talk) 00:23, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the ping thanks O. Turns out that 65.183.78.112 ( talk · contribs) was adding bogus numbers to any article that they touched. I filed an AIV but it hasn't been replied to yet. Thus, I wanted to let you know about this so you can keep an eye out for in case this IP continuous on. Thanks for your time and cheers. MarnetteD| Talk 01:38, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
User Name: Gkwork Article Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Music_Fest_Perugia
Hi, thanks for the reviewing. what kind of citations should I add? I have these articles from the internet: Link 1 Link 2 Link 3 Link 4 Link 5 Link 6 Link 7 Link 8
I didn't provide all of them as citaition since most are in italian and the 2 that I have provided contain all the information on the page.
in addition to these there are articles in printed newspaper mostly in italian which I didn't know how and if to include.
thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gkwork ( talk • contribs) 05:16, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks!
Hi! This is the article that my message refers to /info/en/?search=Draft:CaratLane. You recently reviewed it and declined its submission, I have changed the article based on the reasons for rejection. Could you please take another look at it and let me know if you have any further suggestions?
Thanks very much for your time!
([[User:Kiranbramakrishna|Kiranbramakrishna]]|[[User talk:Kiranbramakrishna|t]] )([[User:Kiranbramakrishna|COI]]) ( talk) 10:13, 29 April 2015 (UTC)Kiranbramakrishna
Hi, you just reviewed an article about Herve Moulin ( /info/en/?search=Draft:Herv%C3%A9_Moulin) You claimed that his article "do not adequately show the subject's notability". I have provided evidence that Moulin's work is relevant by showing it was quoted in a Nobel Laureate speech. Also, I provided links to already existing pages in wikipedia which talk about his work, see /info/en/?search=Participation_criterion, /info/en/?search=Mathematical_economics or /info/en/?search=Entitlement_(fair_division). Moreover, I am providing evidence of scientific journals: I do not know of any material which I can quote that is more verifiable (I am even providing the ISBNs and DOIs) or notable of including in an encyclopedia.
Your feedback and reevaluation will be very acknowledged.
You rejected Hilary Paynter, which I have now published, and which is about someone who has works in the Victoria & Albert Museum, and The Ashmolean; who is an Honorary Member of the Royal Birmingham Society of Artists; and a Past President of the Royal Society of Painter Printmakers, as non-notable. Rejecting good articles such as this is damaging to Wikipedia, and demotivating to editors. Please review WP:N and WP:BITE. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:59, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
You and I usually disagree, and therefore I think you are usually wrong, but, irregardless, I greatly appreciate your hard work at Articles for Creation! Please keep up your great work, with more care or more cookies as appropriate. Arthur goes shopping ( talk) 23:14, 29 April 2015 (UTC) |
Hi I have done my very best to provide the most accurate information about my article to your esteemed office. I even went as far as sending soft copies of the 2 separate articles from the 2 different magazines from 1987 to Mr Axl Matulic so as to verify the sources of the draft of my article.
As for notability, I believe anyone who had escaped with about 2 to 3 million dollars of money through fraudulent mail order business in 1986 in the USA and had done something similar in 2012 in Singapore taking unsecured loans from almost all major banks here) and again escaping to an overseas location is worth reading and taking note of.
I cant figure out what else could I do to encourage your office to publish my article on your homepage.
I would be obliged if you could please reply to me directly at jerry.mohinani@yahoo.com.
Regards
Jerry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victim86 ( talk • contribs) 04:42, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, One15969, you might remember me from the article on Barry Kerzin which you kindly helped me with and eventually approved. I wonder if you could advise me, please? I have been working on a related article, on the Dalai Lama, since I saw what was written really needed some correction and improvement, and over the last week or so I added quite a bit of carefully researched information, with citations, to state what I know to be the facts (I've known the present Dalai Lama personally and been a Tibetan Buddhist myself for the last 40 years). However, someone called Victoria Grayson has just come in and deleted everything I added wholesale saying it was "original research". Could you have time to take a look and let me know if it is right, that my addition is inappropriate, or whether it's just a case of vandalism. It's the second time he/she's deleted all my work here and this person seems to have an axe to grind and is determined to cling to his/her views - despite all my careful research and addition of what I thought were adequate citations along with references to other related Wikipedia articles; and also detailed explanations which I posted in the related discussion on the article's 'talk' page. If it's a form of vandalism, what can I do about it? Many thanks, MacPraughan ( talk) 09:17, 30 April 2015 (UTC) P.S> I changed my user name from Sean M Jones
Hello,
Thank you very much for reviewing the article I submit. I would really appriciate it if you can give me some more details of how i can improve my article. I understand that the references are not notable, however is the content right? Should I add more information, like awards? Also, I found some good references in websites such as postonline.co.uk and insurancetimes.co.uk, however you need to subscrive to view the articles. Is this a problem?
This is the link to my article
/info/en/?search=Draft:RIAS_insuranceCite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
Thank you very much, Antonia.christodoulou 80.0.219.171 ( talk) 14:01, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
One15969
I truly respect your editor status and wanting WIKI to present itself in the highest mode. Can you help the Club Manitou article? It truly was an important part of Michigan history in 1930's-1940's. It then morphed into the Club Ponytail in 1962. The Ponytail was the premier mid-west teen dance club from 1962 until it was destroyed by fire in 1969. Both articles are important to Michigan history. Thank you-EFV — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eugene Francois Vidocq ( talk • contribs) 17:10, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I really need some help and guidance in creating this page. The subject: Charles Edward Hall has been santa for Radio City Music Hall for 30 years and his book is being turned into a movie. I feel like that is noteworthy enough for wikipedia. Could you please help me organize this information correctly.
Thanks,
100.33.115.76 (
talk)
17:37, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi One5969 -
I was just in Scottsdale last weekend. Great weather as it was cooler than normal. I have updated the draft for Florence Morse Kingsley located at: /info/en/?search=Draft:Florence_Morse_Kingsley#Professional_life
Much of her work is still available even though it was written a century ago. Not sure if it meets Wikipedia's standards. Let me know. Regards, Sfo1980 Sfo1980 ( talk) 20:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)