![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Welcome!
Hello, OSborn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! I'm glad you are starting as a new page patroller :) -
Domthedude001
01:49, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Hey there, I noticed you tagged the page Dr. Mark Hamilton as being possibly unnotable. If you look here you will find this statement: 'With significant roles in notable films, television, stage performances, and other productions.' Do you think this will cover this presenter as he is the presenter of a radio show on BBC Radio 1? If not, I will go any try and find some other proof that he is notable :P Thanks, Tiddly-Tom 19:08, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
I mainly contribute on French History, Chinese History, and Chinese Calligraphy articles, this "software stub" is my first one. Can you give me some advice to make it more "standard".
I'm currently writing some question in the talk page (readable in 5 mins). Yug (talk) 05:50, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Heya - may want to remove your AfD, as the article seems to have been speedied. Cheers! - superβεεcat 21:15, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
It took the items which in members are only worth for fire training and low level fletch, and put em in the one thousnads, in a single day, and all the items dropped price, jsut as the dragon 2h did. but con put worthless items like planks, oak and normal logs and nails, which litterly had no use, and make them some of the most valued items in the game simply because they were in rare stock and all trees and rocks were being mined up simply for resources in the house. If this dosn't represent a massive shift and some inflation i don't know what does.-- Cody6 22:26, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I am currently working on updating the University of Windsor Baja Page. I will put all of the stats into a Wiki Table. I am working on gathering all of the information to put it all together. I took out all of the < br / > tags. I am currently working on building my understanding on Wikipedia and i appreciate your feedback.Thanks.
-- UWBaja 21:58, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this article. What a mess, what a potential lawsuit! I had to speedy it. Bearian 15:28, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Why did you twice delete Underlight: Shades of Truth from the list of free MMOGs? It was a commercially run MMORPG for 8 years that is now offered for free by a motivated group of players. It is totally free, no ads, no gimmicks. It's exactly what that list is meant for.?
Cheers, LucasTMW —Preceding unsigned comment added by LucasTMW ( talk • contribs) 17:23, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
It started in 1998, and was made free in Oct 2007. If you go to the Underlight page, you can read about the history of the game, and that the current free version was renamed.
Noticed you tagging a couple of pages with notenglish. Thought this might be handy. Couple of sites you might want to look at for working out the language: TextCat XEROX Language Identifier ARendedWinter 15:37, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Just a quick question - did you have evidence to suggest that there would be canvassing or shenanigans at this AfD? I ask because that's why the notavote template is usually added to the debate, whereas you've added with the nomination. Thanks, UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 15:55, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Why do these white jelly beans taste like black licorice? Seriously, what the heck? 209.213.9.125 ( talk) 21:06, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Please don't add {{ stub}} tags to articles like Park Place Productions which already have a subject-specific stub tag. And if you're adding a stub tag, please add it at the end, as specified in WP:LAYOUT, not at the start of the article. Thanks. PamD ( talk) 22:48, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
I have been on a source hunt for the AfD and would ask you to revisit the discussion. Thanks, Bigger digger ( talk) 00:38, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
I have reinstated the CSD that you removed from the article. According to WP:ORG, "Simply stated, an organization is a group of more than one person formed together for a purpose. This includes commercial and non-commercial activities, such as charitable organizations, educational institutions, hospitals, institutions, interest groups, social clubs, companies, partnerships, proprietorships, religious denominations, sects, etc." If I am reading this wrong or if there is another article that supersedes this inclusion please let me know. ttonyb ( talk) 01:42, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Have I put enough on the page for you to remove the speedy deletion template? I will work on it some more later, but right now want to go eat dinner and I don't want it deleted in the meantime.-- 2008Olympian chitchat 01:35, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with the 1saleaday references. I'm new to Wikipedia, at least the writing/editing side of the site, and I'm wondering why the article was marked for speedy deletion? Yes, it's about a company but I don't see how one can say the "article is written like an advertisement." There are numerous sources to anything written and the trademark dispute is of significant interest to many. Thanks, Mordechai10 ( talk) 18:42, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Much appreciated explanation of the terms. I also noticed your comment on the 1saleaday Article For Speedy Deletion. This is simply because I'm new to this side of the site. I've already made two more edits to other articles and hope to find more ways to improve the content on Wikipedia. Mordechai10 ( talk) 21:06, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your edits on the article. Looking at it now, I can see how the "Marketing Section" seemed promotional. Mordechai10 ( talk) 19:43, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Article was once again nominated for deletion, see you said the nom has been blocked. What does that mean from here? When will the tag be removed? Thanks Mordechai10 ( talk) 15:52, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 08:50, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.
If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:11, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
I inadvertently restore a version of the above when the author had blanked it - in Huggle it looked like a removal of content. I have therefore marked it as a speedy delete. I hadn't intended to stumble over your PROD but the article urgently needs to go! Velella Velella Talk 23:42, 20 January 2011 (UTC) sorry I was drunk at a party when I did that Bieber edit, and someone dared me to do it for a laugh-- Louis Taylor ( talk) 22:49, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
sorry, but i found your reasons wanting. so i reverted it back to the way i liked it. would you like a change? how about you try not cutting wholesale paragraphs and sections without anything more than simple platitudes? thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scarmudgeon ( talk • contribs) 17:27, 30 January 2011 (UTC) -- Scarmudgeon ( talk) 17:35, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Get going! The February 2011 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive has begun. Please get started, as the drive aims to wikify over 2,000 articles this month. We're going to need all the firepower we can get, so please remind your friends to join up as well. In case you didn't know, wikification is fairly simple: just add wiki markup, links, and similar formatting. Thanks for joining; we're looking forward to an exciting time this month! Regards, Guoguo12 ( talk · contribs), Mono ( talk · contribs), Nolelover ( talk · contribs), and Sumsum2010 ( talk · contribs). |
![]() |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 01:08, 2 February 2011 (UTC).
Thanks for your intervention at Hilton_Family. The (new) user had already reached 3RR but I was reluctant to deploy it, per WP:BITE, and also reluctant to appear to be seen as being draconian without some form of backup - which you have provided. As it happens, I think that the article should be at AfD anyway but I need to firm up my understanding of the policies before letting loose. - Sitush ( talk) 00:19, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, my first barnstar! :) OSborn arf contribs. 00:19, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi, OSborn. I saw you commented on my big edit of the article about FreeHand. Yes I got that "Interest" warning, did very surprise me. Its right I am a long time user of that software and I am also co founder of FreeFreeHand who wants to revive it. Now, I am not trying to sell anything, just paying contribution to the application I love so much and use every day for the past 23 years - simply said, it deserves a better, more profound entry in Wikipedia. And who else would be able and willing to do such a work, if not the ones who know it best? However, I only put the facts in there. But see for yourself. Maybe the only point that may be problematic from the "interest warning" point of view may be that some references point to FreeFreeHand. Just because we are part of (if any tehere will be) future of FreeHand. But if thats a problem, I am willing to delete those of course. What do you think? Thü Hürlimann ( talk) 21:57, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Could you give some more solid, specific suggestions for improving the Pixelmetrix page??? I did a lot of editing already (adding 3rd-party sources and neutralizing the tone of the article. How come you still insist that it's 1. advertising 2. no 3rd-party sources 3. close connection. I appreciate your help. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suksme ( talk • contribs)
Thanks. 1. which words exactly? 2. I'm a college business student doing a project and this is my very first time editing a wikipedia article. Of course I want to make sure that the article achieves perfect neutrality because I move on to other articles.
I just removed the list of awards. Please take a look again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suksme ( talk • contribs)
When you tag something as a CSD G12, such as Miss dolly dollars, please remember to include the url of the site being copied.-- SPhilbrick T 00:57, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello OSborn, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Miss dolly dollars, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: You have not indicated where this page has been copied from, and I cannot find any candidates. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. -- Lear's Fool 02:56, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Please help! The February 2011 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive is almost complete. Please help, as the backlog is still very large. Still exceeding 20,000 articles! The goal is 18,000 or less. Lets see if we can do it! We're going to need all the firepower we can get, so please remind your friends to help as well.Thank you for all your help thus far! Regards, Guoguo12 ( talk · contribs), Mono ( talk · contribs), Nolelover ( talk · contribs), Sumsum2010 ( talk · contribs), and WikiCopter ( talk · contribs). |
![]() |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 04:25, 24 February 2011 (UTC).
Hi OSborn,
I saw that you are in the Wikification Leaderboard of February 2011 and I would like to ask you if you want to participate in an initiative [Public Policy Initiative (PPI)] carried out by
Wikipedia:WikiProject United States Public Policy. If you are interested in research and want to experiment with article assessment or just want to help out, please, join our group of assessors because we really need your help. If you have questions or need more information, please check out
the discussion on the assessment tab and the
WPUSPP Assessment department, or contact
ARoth (Public Policy Initiative) (
talk ·
contribs), who is the Research Analyst for the project. Also, if you know valuable and trusted editors who are expert in USPP and/or articles assessment, please invite them to participate to this project. The work to be done is not so much, and will start next spring. Your help would be much needed and greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance and all the best. –
pjoef (
talk •
contribs)
10:24, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
If you don't like that message for its religious connotation, change it to whatever you want.
posted by
43?9enter (
talk ·
contribs)
Hello OSborn. I'm trying to create a sub-category entry in the Afro-Latin American section, and having paused from a first effort, return to find myself in an edit conflict with you. As a result I had to cancel changes. Could you please restore them, I have to quit working right now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beepsie ( talk • contribs) 17:45, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Welcome!
Hello, OSborn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! I'm glad you are starting as a new page patroller :) -
Domthedude001
01:49, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Hey there, I noticed you tagged the page Dr. Mark Hamilton as being possibly unnotable. If you look here you will find this statement: 'With significant roles in notable films, television, stage performances, and other productions.' Do you think this will cover this presenter as he is the presenter of a radio show on BBC Radio 1? If not, I will go any try and find some other proof that he is notable :P Thanks, Tiddly-Tom 19:08, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
I mainly contribute on French History, Chinese History, and Chinese Calligraphy articles, this "software stub" is my first one. Can you give me some advice to make it more "standard".
I'm currently writing some question in the talk page (readable in 5 mins). Yug (talk) 05:50, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Heya - may want to remove your AfD, as the article seems to have been speedied. Cheers! - superβεεcat 21:15, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
It took the items which in members are only worth for fire training and low level fletch, and put em in the one thousnads, in a single day, and all the items dropped price, jsut as the dragon 2h did. but con put worthless items like planks, oak and normal logs and nails, which litterly had no use, and make them some of the most valued items in the game simply because they were in rare stock and all trees and rocks were being mined up simply for resources in the house. If this dosn't represent a massive shift and some inflation i don't know what does.-- Cody6 22:26, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I am currently working on updating the University of Windsor Baja Page. I will put all of the stats into a Wiki Table. I am working on gathering all of the information to put it all together. I took out all of the < br / > tags. I am currently working on building my understanding on Wikipedia and i appreciate your feedback.Thanks.
-- UWBaja 21:58, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this article. What a mess, what a potential lawsuit! I had to speedy it. Bearian 15:28, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Why did you twice delete Underlight: Shades of Truth from the list of free MMOGs? It was a commercially run MMORPG for 8 years that is now offered for free by a motivated group of players. It is totally free, no ads, no gimmicks. It's exactly what that list is meant for.?
Cheers, LucasTMW —Preceding unsigned comment added by LucasTMW ( talk • contribs) 17:23, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
It started in 1998, and was made free in Oct 2007. If you go to the Underlight page, you can read about the history of the game, and that the current free version was renamed.
Noticed you tagging a couple of pages with notenglish. Thought this might be handy. Couple of sites you might want to look at for working out the language: TextCat XEROX Language Identifier ARendedWinter 15:37, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Just a quick question - did you have evidence to suggest that there would be canvassing or shenanigans at this AfD? I ask because that's why the notavote template is usually added to the debate, whereas you've added with the nomination. Thanks, UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 15:55, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Why do these white jelly beans taste like black licorice? Seriously, what the heck? 209.213.9.125 ( talk) 21:06, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Please don't add {{ stub}} tags to articles like Park Place Productions which already have a subject-specific stub tag. And if you're adding a stub tag, please add it at the end, as specified in WP:LAYOUT, not at the start of the article. Thanks. PamD ( talk) 22:48, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
I have been on a source hunt for the AfD and would ask you to revisit the discussion. Thanks, Bigger digger ( talk) 00:38, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
I have reinstated the CSD that you removed from the article. According to WP:ORG, "Simply stated, an organization is a group of more than one person formed together for a purpose. This includes commercial and non-commercial activities, such as charitable organizations, educational institutions, hospitals, institutions, interest groups, social clubs, companies, partnerships, proprietorships, religious denominations, sects, etc." If I am reading this wrong or if there is another article that supersedes this inclusion please let me know. ttonyb ( talk) 01:42, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Have I put enough on the page for you to remove the speedy deletion template? I will work on it some more later, but right now want to go eat dinner and I don't want it deleted in the meantime.-- 2008Olympian chitchat 01:35, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with the 1saleaday references. I'm new to Wikipedia, at least the writing/editing side of the site, and I'm wondering why the article was marked for speedy deletion? Yes, it's about a company but I don't see how one can say the "article is written like an advertisement." There are numerous sources to anything written and the trademark dispute is of significant interest to many. Thanks, Mordechai10 ( talk) 18:42, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Much appreciated explanation of the terms. I also noticed your comment on the 1saleaday Article For Speedy Deletion. This is simply because I'm new to this side of the site. I've already made two more edits to other articles and hope to find more ways to improve the content on Wikipedia. Mordechai10 ( talk) 21:06, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your edits on the article. Looking at it now, I can see how the "Marketing Section" seemed promotional. Mordechai10 ( talk) 19:43, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Article was once again nominated for deletion, see you said the nom has been blocked. What does that mean from here? When will the tag be removed? Thanks Mordechai10 ( talk) 15:52, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 08:50, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.
If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:11, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
I inadvertently restore a version of the above when the author had blanked it - in Huggle it looked like a removal of content. I have therefore marked it as a speedy delete. I hadn't intended to stumble over your PROD but the article urgently needs to go! Velella Velella Talk 23:42, 20 January 2011 (UTC) sorry I was drunk at a party when I did that Bieber edit, and someone dared me to do it for a laugh-- Louis Taylor ( talk) 22:49, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
sorry, but i found your reasons wanting. so i reverted it back to the way i liked it. would you like a change? how about you try not cutting wholesale paragraphs and sections without anything more than simple platitudes? thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scarmudgeon ( talk • contribs) 17:27, 30 January 2011 (UTC) -- Scarmudgeon ( talk) 17:35, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Get going! The February 2011 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive has begun. Please get started, as the drive aims to wikify over 2,000 articles this month. We're going to need all the firepower we can get, so please remind your friends to join up as well. In case you didn't know, wikification is fairly simple: just add wiki markup, links, and similar formatting. Thanks for joining; we're looking forward to an exciting time this month! Regards, Guoguo12 ( talk · contribs), Mono ( talk · contribs), Nolelover ( talk · contribs), and Sumsum2010 ( talk · contribs). |
![]() |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 01:08, 2 February 2011 (UTC).
Thanks for your intervention at Hilton_Family. The (new) user had already reached 3RR but I was reluctant to deploy it, per WP:BITE, and also reluctant to appear to be seen as being draconian without some form of backup - which you have provided. As it happens, I think that the article should be at AfD anyway but I need to firm up my understanding of the policies before letting loose. - Sitush ( talk) 00:19, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, my first barnstar! :) OSborn arf contribs. 00:19, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi, OSborn. I saw you commented on my big edit of the article about FreeHand. Yes I got that "Interest" warning, did very surprise me. Its right I am a long time user of that software and I am also co founder of FreeFreeHand who wants to revive it. Now, I am not trying to sell anything, just paying contribution to the application I love so much and use every day for the past 23 years - simply said, it deserves a better, more profound entry in Wikipedia. And who else would be able and willing to do such a work, if not the ones who know it best? However, I only put the facts in there. But see for yourself. Maybe the only point that may be problematic from the "interest warning" point of view may be that some references point to FreeFreeHand. Just because we are part of (if any tehere will be) future of FreeHand. But if thats a problem, I am willing to delete those of course. What do you think? Thü Hürlimann ( talk) 21:57, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Could you give some more solid, specific suggestions for improving the Pixelmetrix page??? I did a lot of editing already (adding 3rd-party sources and neutralizing the tone of the article. How come you still insist that it's 1. advertising 2. no 3rd-party sources 3. close connection. I appreciate your help. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suksme ( talk • contribs)
Thanks. 1. which words exactly? 2. I'm a college business student doing a project and this is my very first time editing a wikipedia article. Of course I want to make sure that the article achieves perfect neutrality because I move on to other articles.
I just removed the list of awards. Please take a look again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suksme ( talk • contribs)
When you tag something as a CSD G12, such as Miss dolly dollars, please remember to include the url of the site being copied.-- SPhilbrick T 00:57, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello OSborn, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Miss dolly dollars, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: You have not indicated where this page has been copied from, and I cannot find any candidates. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. -- Lear's Fool 02:56, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Please help! The February 2011 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive is almost complete. Please help, as the backlog is still very large. Still exceeding 20,000 articles! The goal is 18,000 or less. Lets see if we can do it! We're going to need all the firepower we can get, so please remind your friends to help as well.Thank you for all your help thus far! Regards, Guoguo12 ( talk · contribs), Mono ( talk · contribs), Nolelover ( talk · contribs), Sumsum2010 ( talk · contribs), and WikiCopter ( talk · contribs). |
![]() |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 04:25, 24 February 2011 (UTC).
Hi OSborn,
I saw that you are in the Wikification Leaderboard of February 2011 and I would like to ask you if you want to participate in an initiative [Public Policy Initiative (PPI)] carried out by
Wikipedia:WikiProject United States Public Policy. If you are interested in research and want to experiment with article assessment or just want to help out, please, join our group of assessors because we really need your help. If you have questions or need more information, please check out
the discussion on the assessment tab and the
WPUSPP Assessment department, or contact
ARoth (Public Policy Initiative) (
talk ·
contribs), who is the Research Analyst for the project. Also, if you know valuable and trusted editors who are expert in USPP and/or articles assessment, please invite them to participate to this project. The work to be done is not so much, and will start next spring. Your help would be much needed and greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance and all the best. –
pjoef (
talk •
contribs)
10:24, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
If you don't like that message for its religious connotation, change it to whatever you want.
posted by
43?9enter (
talk ·
contribs)
Hello OSborn. I'm trying to create a sub-category entry in the Afro-Latin American section, and having paused from a first effort, return to find myself in an edit conflict with you. As a result I had to cancel changes. Could you please restore them, I have to quit working right now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beepsie ( talk • contribs) 17:45, 7 March 2011 (UTC)