![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 |
Could you explain this? Mistake, perhaps? — MusikAnimal talk 01:54, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello OSX:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable
Halloween!
– –
Davey2010 •
(talk)
22:39, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
There is a discussion at WikiProject Motorsport you may or may not have an opinion on. V7867 ( talk) 17:38, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi OSX. Since you are one of the experts in Toyota's vehicles, I would like to consult with you that now that Toyota named is series production Toyota FCV as Toyota Mirai, shall we renamed the FCV article, or keep the FCV as the concept/preproduction and create a new article for the Mirai? In the mean time I created a redirect from Mirai to the FCV article. Also, please feel free to do any appropriate changes yourself. --Cheers. Mariordo ( talk) 13:58, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
I'm afraid it's not true that it was "not discussed first". It was in fact discussed here almost three weeks ago. I'm sorry you missed it. If you wish to join to the discussion, rather late than enver, please do it there, not here. -- Cornellier ( talk) 07:12, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello sir, great catch on the Falcon article about the Mustang & Mondeo generation. I've rechecked and at least on caradvice.com.au the Mondeo they quote is the "5th" generation! But you're correction to "4th" is correct... must be because it is known as the "Mk5"? Anyway, also wanted to raise the retail price issues, mainly in the Magna article. I note it was fully referenced but one of the moderators made it go (abusively in my mind). Unfortunately just removing the listed prices has you had to endure has resulted in some sentences not reading right... and I think I have done enough on that page to leave things as they are. UNLESS, you were not to feel compelled to disallow the reinclusion of prices (accidentally or otherwise lol). It is quite farcical that that moderator had an issue with it when (a) the prices were fully referenced; (b) the car is out of production so it can't be said that listing prices can result in people taking advantage; (c) I see prices included in other car articles - e.g. just saw the Ferrari F430 page. Where do you stand on this? P.S. looking to your FG X photography! Cheers CtrlXctrlV ( talk) 12:25, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Just noticed you previously moved it yourself [1]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ummmyeahreally ( talk • contribs) 04:54, 24 November 2014
Hi,
It's your best friend Nim
On the article Subaru Impreza I have been changing the subtitle of User:EurovisionNim's photo as then it would make some more sense. Could you please not change it because it is actually my image and I am using this IP because my account has been BLOCKED under my request for three months. I am editing under an IP address because the blocking user User:Graeme Bartlett and then the Wikibreak enforcer is preventing me to log onto the site.
Can you please forgive me if I have caused any hassles. But I like the subtitles to make sense because if a reader wants to know about the car then if it is subtitled properly then they can recognise the model of the car
60.224.249.55 ( talk) 09:17, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi OSX,
It's Nim again
Could you tell me the reason why you needed to revert User:EurovisionNim's images. The images were only illustrating the Australian version of cars available. If you want to revert an image you need to tell why you reverted the images. I am not upset in fact I have most of it removed. It can be slightly annoying when you don't put into the edit summary why you reverted it because then users will not know why it had been deleted.
I miss editing Wikipedia and now I have changed the way I edit articles. If you can could you tell me in brief why you reverted my car photos off Wikipedia without putting it in the edit summary. If you can tell me that would be excellent.
- 60.224.249.55 ( talk) 04:03, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Just thought I'd drop you a line - the IP editor who kept changing the size on the Opel Corsa article was also active in the same vein on the Ford Sierra article. That page has just had protection lifted, and straight away the IP changed the car size again with no discussion. It's not unreasonable to assume that they may appear back on the Corsa page as well at some point. Chaheel Riens ( talk) 12:43, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
I found it here. This could lead to other internet based sources of GM-Holden platform information. ( Regushee ( talk) 15:57, 5 January 2015 (UTC))
Thank you very much for the The Original Barnstar! I appreciate!-- Arado ( talk) 18:13, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Is User talk:OSX II linked to you in any way or just a similar name? Stepho talk 07:00, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Oh you're a fucking idiot bastard right?! Many of Wikipedia users thinks that my editing is very very very constructive only you're who is too far from constructive comment to any other editing. Wikipedia is free to edit as we are here members and have sufficient knowledge to give information to world citizens am I right hot damn bastard?? James British 05:00, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
I do agree that the citation needed tag should only be used in a article, but there is a reason why I placed that tag there. The reason was that, there is a discussion over whether the category page I created named Super cars, should be deleted or not because it does not comply with the classification rules on the wiki project conventions page. This convention that super cars are not a classification is a big problem. Since, on many pages of cars the info box has super car set for its classification, some even have a reference (although those cars may not be on the category page since I did not add all the supercars in the world on that category page yet. ). This also means that the Wikipedia article supercar should also get deleted if it is not a car classification. Also, the convention seems baseless, anyone could have just typed it in, it is like as if some one says that there should not be a category for electric or fuel engines because they are both engines and should be in a common category named engines. That would not make any sense, so please consider that decision that you made, if you do not want to undo your edit I do not mind, just tell me the reason why. Please respond soon. Thank you. Doorknob747 01:32, 9 March 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doorknob747 ( talk • contribs)
What was the reason to remove Template:Distinguish from the Toyota Land Cruiser page? Salmin ( talk) 04:53, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This user has been awarded with the Big interest in car award. |
Doorknob747 20:35, 19 March 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doorknob747 ( talk • contribs)
Hi, sorry, looks like I am unintentionally keeping you busy tonight undoing my work! I guess I only briefly contemplated the merit of crowding the main Commodore page with more photos or removing non-Chevy Omega photos... no issue with either of your reverts of course. On the Omega article though, why feature a VX Holden when there's a VTII Chevy available? Surely that's fit to feature in that article somewhere? CtrlXctrlV ( talk) 12:24, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
@ CtrlXctrlV, the images at Wiki Commons have now been deleted. I strongly suggest that you DO NOT upload anymore copyright violations in the future. I have not filed any formal complaint this time, but if it happens again you will leave me with no choice but to do this. You will probably end up with a block.
Should you wish to use an image found somewhere on the internet that is not licensed under a compatible Wiki license please ask me to assist you with the OTRS work required to get the appropriate permissions. Regards, OSX ( talk • contributions) 07:28, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, looks like your photo renaming caused some pix to disappear, from here Tickford Vehicle Engineering and whatever other page used the same material. CtrlXctrlV ( talk) 13:08, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello. I know the Ford Ranger in its first generation was basically a 1983-1989/1990 compact pickup truck. I also know that the Ford Ranger in its first generation and in production as early as January 1991. That's all I know where I see commercials off of youtube so I think the Ford Ranger ended production of the first generation in 1991 of early January. So basically the Rangers model years of the first generation was 1983 to 1989/1990. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.4.56.149 ( talk) 00:38, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Better be prepared, as the Perodua Myvi article might get vandalized within the week due to a controversial car accident in Malaysia. - Areaseven ( talk) 16:33, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX, Hope you are well and thanks for the comment about my improvements of my photos,
I recently purchased a DSLR so that might've been the reason why they are at excellent quality.
Now down to business :D
I am looking back at the following articles: Holden Commodore (VE) and Chevrolet Omega
Now both of them have the following image: File:2007 Holden Berlina (VE MY07) sedan (2007-03-08).jpg which I think it is at low quality that I do not think is the best because it only shows the rear view of the car. Now have a look at the following image I photographed: File:2006-2009 Holden VE Berlina sedan (2015-05-29).JPG - I believe that image is better because it shows the front view and also shows the sides. I read WP:CARPIX and photographed the car accordingly. I waited for the sun to dim and when there was only a little bit of sun I took a photograph of the car.
Please OSX, could you find which is the better image and reply.
Thanks and keep up the good work EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 07:23, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX. In this comment, did you mean "I'm not proposing a deletion"? Regards. DH85868993 ( talk) 00:29, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX,
Well done on uploading some more Australian new car photos. Looks like you stole the job from me.
I will be heading to singapore and vietnam on a holiday so I will be photographing cars to add to illustrate the different cars available in Singapore and Vietnam. Please if possible can you reply on my talk page and tell me which cars I should be photographing. I will then take those photos of these cars and add them to Wikipedia. I will be taking my Canon DSLR and take photographs of those cars.
If you reply on my talkpage then what I can do is write down the cars and then when I head on holidays on December 22 - January 18 I will if possible photograph those cars and add them to Wikipedia.
Be aware that I will be picking up the pieces of the cars you forgot to photograph.
However if you wish to reply on your talkpage it is not a problem.
Anyway please keep up the great work and happy editing and photographing EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 08:34, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
You do realize that all of those trim lists are unsourced, right? And that they're UK specific, which isn't appropriate. Plus, the way they're written looks almost exactly like the brochure, which makes me think it is probably a copyvio. So why on earth are you trying to edit-war to keep in totally unsourced information that is UK specific and contains OR commentary to boot? Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 00:38, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX, I don't know about you, but I strongly dislike using a spacer (comma or space) whenever there is a four-digit number. That is, I would like to write 1998 and 12,043, but never 1,998. I found that the tag "comma=5" allows for just that. Now, since the WP style guide says that the spacer is optional for four-digit numerals, is there any way to make a bot add "|comma=5" to all conversion templates used on automotive pages? I reckon a conversation before such a large scale edit is carried out would be good, I just wanted to know a) if it is possible and b) if anyone agreed with me on this. Cheers, Mr.choppers | ✎ 16:36, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I hope I haven't wasted my time but I just created a new page on Corsa Specialised Vehicles. I just realised its contents correctly states "Specialised" but the title reads "Special"! How can it be fixed? And can you independently review it so that it remains permanently published? Cheers CtrlXctrlV ( talk) 16:25, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
I didn't even do anything wrong, i was jus saying its the de facto replacement. no reason to edit it out. if you want to edit it out, edit out the part where it says the buick verano replaced it in canada. -- 50.180.208.181 ( talk) 21:22, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Any reason to do this? © Tbhotch ™ ( en-2.5). 02:57, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX,
A lot of your images have been placed however it is cluttering the articles. Some images are fine but is it alright if I use my Canon EOS 700D and photograph the cars in my Nedlands area and they turn up as high quality could I please replace them.
I would suggest having a few images removed but I do like your images with the Panasonic LX100. My aim is to photograph the Toyota Camry facelift but the front view so if you could kindly leave that out if possible. I live not far from a dealership and a mate and myself are catching up over the weekend so I will be photographing more cars. I will be aiming at the newer cars like the Mercedes, BMW, Ford and all the other cars I find.
One question - if my images are of same quality do you have a problem with me replacing your image.
Kind Regards -- EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 05:58, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX,
I hope you are well. I am focusing now on the Ford Falcon (AU) article. Your image File:2000-2001 Ford AUII Falcon Futura 01.jpg is only showing the rear view of the Futura whilst my image File:2000-2001 Ford AUII Falcon Futura Station Wagon 01.jpg is showing the front view of the car. Do you think my image is better than yours in showing the view of the Ford Falcon AUII Futura. Cheers -- EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 05:35, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX, Again we chat!! I am a bit curious as I have been for a while. Is the car photography you do a hobby or is it a job. Regards -- EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 11:33, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
(Classic reply above haha). Just wondering, now that I discovered a/the official webpage for recalls by manufacturers, do you think it would be a waste of time or be frowned upon just adding it as an "external link" at the bottom of the articles? CtrlXctrlV ( talk) 04:11, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
I find them really boring, but it's nearly impossible to find the specs of the everyday imports from the seventies and eighties. I will probably buy a few more old buyer's guides to get some more info. Thanks for noticing! Mr.choppers | ✎ 14:51, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kia. Since you had some involvement with the Kia redirect (the move discussion), you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Godsy( TALK CONT) 21:03, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Please do not edit Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.39.15.225 ( talk) 15:06, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi, firstly, I hope I won't have caused any hassles with the Chevrolet Omega re-gig of the photos - just pointing this out, out of courtesy. Secondly, apologies for the extra work I seemed to have caused you lately (e.g. had no idea you should not bold a link, but you learn every day... just unfortunate there's inconsistencies on here). Thirdly, the HSV cars and especially the VN GTS. I have seen on Holden forums that the NZ model was definitely an HSV. Why do you say otherwise? And I think in the VN article, some HSV special editions may have been deleted since my edits. The approach I took was to list as "HSV" any car by them, even if "Holden" badged (the most notorious being the VN Group A SS SV). Is this perhaps where we differ on the "LE"? If it is Holden badged but HSV built, it should be attributed to HSV like the SS above. Not being argumentative, just trying to understand as I just relied on (consistent) online resources to reconcile the HSV list, and you might have superior knowledge and resources. CtrlXctrlV ( talk) 17:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX,
Long time since we haven't had a chat.
I am just curious to find out how you manage to get the cars that have had damage back to factory specifications on Photoshop.
For example some files below:
Can you please give me instructions and uploading on Wikimedia Commons, would that be against the rules for overwriting files, please can you tell me, thanks -- EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 10:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
I have come across rather unusual information regarding development histories of various vehicles manufactured during late 20th century and 2000s. Japanese patents have now given a clearer idea of some past models development timelines. This website has full patent filings of various Japanese and European brands, including some with actual approval dates. Apparently it takes a very long time between design freeze and actual launch at Toyota, despite how they "officially" pretend otherwise for marketing purposes. The E120 Corolla Altis/U.S. Corolla was already on by July 22, 1999 and designed many months earlier, despite being launched in late 2001/March 2002.
E110 Corolla was a 1992 design effort, even though some markets had barely received the E100 Corolla that autumn. I work in this area at Jaguar Land Rover (mostly design/production feasibility engineering), so this stuff interests me. The XV20 Camry looked like this in January-February 1994. The Camry Solara design was finished about 2.5 - 3 years before going on sale in August 1998, as shown by this January 18, 1996 patent. For patents sometimes a CGI or CAD file is used or an actual photo of a clay model or master model. In cases of the former, it is almost immediate following design programme approval. The latter or with a running prototype, usually is some significant time afterward (months to 1 year+).---- Carmaker1 ( talk) 06:34, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX,
I went recently on a school camp and as a mate passed a soccer ball to play a game, I dropped my compact camera and is unable to be used. I will not be very active in photographing cars in Australia. I will be going to Vietnam and Singapore to take the photographs of cars.
I am going to be purchasing a new camera, an advanced compact, i.e. Nikon Coolpix S7000 or Panasonic Lumix TZ 70. The camera is too expensive to repair and I only have a DSLR however this is used mainly for serious photography.
I will do my best to get back to the project but i have to get a new one to resume photographing cars in Australia. My primary focus will be on Vietnamese and Singapore cars. Kind regards, -- EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 08:53, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX,
Thank you for photographing more cars. I am struggling to find some old cars in my neighbourhood. I am in Nedlands and it is difficult to find those old timers. I am still photographing cars, but not as often as I did before with my compact camera, as I do not use my iPhone as it takes low quality shots. I was lucky to find a Series II Hyundai i30 on Verdun Street as me and my friend were walking around as he has never seen Nedlands.
I am still taking photos of cars with my DSLR and by December should be able to acquire an advanced compact as the camera was not fixable. Have a nice day -- EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 01:59, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! Though I haven't been completely gone, I just have been editing from IPs instead of my account. Karrmann ( talk) 06:57, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
How did you make change the font on your table of contents of this page? Catmando999 Check out his talk page! 20:49, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX,
User:Davey2010, thinks that File:2015 Ford Mondeo 1.6 Zetec Econetic TDCi Estate (16922091829).jpg is better than File:2015 Ford Mondeo (MD) Ambiente station wagon (2015-11-14) 01.jpg. I do believe that my image is better, albeit its brightness. I do believe mine is better because it is better quality and it does not have the other cars surrounding it. Could you have a look and judge through which of the images are better because I do believe mine is the best and I do not want to go into an edit war and end up blocked.
Please can you help and figure out which one is the best, Thanks -- EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 01:16, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX,
About Overlaet's image of the Ford Mondeo rear view, Davey2010 reverted it. I do believe my image File:2015 Ford Mondeo (MD) Ambiente station wagon (2015-11-14) 02.jpg is better than his image, because of there are no heavy distracting backgrounds. I would like you to decide which is the better one. Thanks -- EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 09:53, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX, Re this edit [4] - Infobox spacing is the norm here and to be honest I assumed it looked okay on them all ?, I use Chrome and everything's spaced fine, Then again I guess if you're using a laptop with a lower screen resolution then it perhaps does look weird, Anyway thanks, – Davey2010 Talk 02:19, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX,
I understand you're a prolific Flickr user, uploading plenty of pictures of cars. However, I'm having great difficulties when it comes to searching through the "Melbourne" tag for free images of Melbourne, its surroundings, beaches, architecture etc. – and instead of quickly finding said images, I'm constantly finding a barrage of images of cars. Would you be able to, if possible, cease tagging said uploads of yours under the "Melbourne" tag, as it is proving to be quite frustrating navigating through the tag to find images for Wikipedia.
A fellow Melburnian, — MelbourneStar☆ talk 08:25, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Please stop reverting changes I made, except it really needs to change. Juan20102006 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:08, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi, remember the page Suzuki XL-7? Well,the second generation was really called "XL7". That´s why I created a page called Suzuki XL7 that did not redirect. And I also used it to put it for main article in the page Suzuki XL-7 About Holden Captiva pages: I created those pages. Please stop changing redirects. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Juan20102006 ( talk • contribs) 22:20, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX,
Could you please upload some more images from jeremyg3030. I am struggling to find photos of cars necessary for the article. He has some new images of the cars that I can use to replace the poor quality images. I cannot seem to activate my Flickr to Commons, as it requires a lot of work and I am unsure how to activate it.
Could you please do me a favour and upload all the car images from jeremyg3030 so I can use it on the articles, to replace the low quality images, Thanks, and have a nice day -- EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 09:00, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Suzuki Cultus. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit-warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 174.23.115.41 ( talk) 08:26, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Reversion has failed, Discussion is obviously failing. Time for an administrator to remove this troll. Stepho talk 11:40, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX,
Thanks for uploading more files. I have never been more appreciated for someone to take the role.
I am going to be heading to Vietnam next week. I am purchasing a Nikon Coolpix S9600, with my grandmother. I have done all the listing of cars in Vietnam that I need for the articles. I would be using a DSLR and Compact to take photos of the cars that are in Vietnam and Singapore which could be of heavy use for the articles as no-one wants to take a photo of cars in Vietnam. The reason I am doing cars in Western Australia is that I would take care of the cars, however in WA it is very sunny and therefore can cause the images to become washed out. In Victoria normally the images are better quality as the weather is a lot of the time cloudy.
I would have to give up the congrats to you mate, however I will be carefully looking for cars in original condition as I did some research and found that cars in Asia are customised which can hinder the quality.
Have a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year :) -- EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 02:23, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX,
I purchased a new camera yesterday. The model is a Nikon Coolpix S7000. I am back in action with the car photography. I also am catching up with a girl that I really like over the holidays so I hope to take some photos of cars when she and I go for a walk together. She told me that she wants me to find some cars around where she lives as she said that Mosman Park, Western Australia is a good hotspot as well as Cottesloe because that is where most of the well maintained cars are. I have done a lot of work looking for cars around my suburbs. I hope to find some cars that is needed for the article on Wikipedia around WA.
I would like to wish you the best of the festive season :) -- EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 02:09, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
|
Thanks for all your help on the 'pedia!
|
Hi OSX,
I would like to wish you and your family a Merry Christmas. Hope for the best in the new year
Please place one on my talkpage please, if you wish. :) -- EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 22:48, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
OSX,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. –
Davey2010
Merry Xmas / Happy New Year
11:13, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
I have created a wiki markup version of File:Australian large car sales 1991 onwards.png using Template:Line chart. Looking to see if others are happy to switch from the image to the wiki markup, which will be placed in its own template. Thanks. – Ky ta bu 00:41, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Since we have articles with titles such as Toyota Corolla (E80), what do you think of having redirect pages such as Lexus GX (J120) that links to Lexus GX#J120? The idea is that we can just link to Lexus GX (J120) regardless of whether it is an individual page or a link to a section within another page. It also means that we can start an article with one page covering all models, then later split it up into individual generations without breaking links. Of course this requires us to build up a lot of redirection pages for existing articles but I can do that. Stepho talk 01:45, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
I reverted his edit to Lexus GX mostly to prod him into providing references himself. He added figures to a number of Toyota articles without references and so far has ignored my request to add references. Hopefully we can train him to do it right instead of just being a fly by nighter that relies on others to clean up after him. Stepho talk 01:37, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Why did you insult me about the pics of the 5th generation Celica? Do you think the pic of your red SX (ST184) with black car in the background is better? Because it's an Aussie spec? Don't you realize that for the pre-facelift, there is a light blue US-spec 1.6 ST (AT180), and the higher model grade is GT-Four? I admit that the pic of red JDM GT-Four A that I took is not so good to be displayed, since it's a pre-facelift but has facelift hood emblem. The pic of my grey metallic All-Trac is a much better one, and currently the black Carlos Sainz model from Italy is the only available pic of the top of the line model which should represents the whole 5th generation (put in the info box). Celica21gtfour 2:00, 8 January 2016
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 |
Could you explain this? Mistake, perhaps? — MusikAnimal talk 01:54, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello OSX:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable
Halloween!
– –
Davey2010 •
(talk)
22:39, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
There is a discussion at WikiProject Motorsport you may or may not have an opinion on. V7867 ( talk) 17:38, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi OSX. Since you are one of the experts in Toyota's vehicles, I would like to consult with you that now that Toyota named is series production Toyota FCV as Toyota Mirai, shall we renamed the FCV article, or keep the FCV as the concept/preproduction and create a new article for the Mirai? In the mean time I created a redirect from Mirai to the FCV article. Also, please feel free to do any appropriate changes yourself. --Cheers. Mariordo ( talk) 13:58, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
I'm afraid it's not true that it was "not discussed first". It was in fact discussed here almost three weeks ago. I'm sorry you missed it. If you wish to join to the discussion, rather late than enver, please do it there, not here. -- Cornellier ( talk) 07:12, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello sir, great catch on the Falcon article about the Mustang & Mondeo generation. I've rechecked and at least on caradvice.com.au the Mondeo they quote is the "5th" generation! But you're correction to "4th" is correct... must be because it is known as the "Mk5"? Anyway, also wanted to raise the retail price issues, mainly in the Magna article. I note it was fully referenced but one of the moderators made it go (abusively in my mind). Unfortunately just removing the listed prices has you had to endure has resulted in some sentences not reading right... and I think I have done enough on that page to leave things as they are. UNLESS, you were not to feel compelled to disallow the reinclusion of prices (accidentally or otherwise lol). It is quite farcical that that moderator had an issue with it when (a) the prices were fully referenced; (b) the car is out of production so it can't be said that listing prices can result in people taking advantage; (c) I see prices included in other car articles - e.g. just saw the Ferrari F430 page. Where do you stand on this? P.S. looking to your FG X photography! Cheers CtrlXctrlV ( talk) 12:25, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Just noticed you previously moved it yourself [1]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ummmyeahreally ( talk • contribs) 04:54, 24 November 2014
Hi,
It's your best friend Nim
On the article Subaru Impreza I have been changing the subtitle of User:EurovisionNim's photo as then it would make some more sense. Could you please not change it because it is actually my image and I am using this IP because my account has been BLOCKED under my request for three months. I am editing under an IP address because the blocking user User:Graeme Bartlett and then the Wikibreak enforcer is preventing me to log onto the site.
Can you please forgive me if I have caused any hassles. But I like the subtitles to make sense because if a reader wants to know about the car then if it is subtitled properly then they can recognise the model of the car
60.224.249.55 ( talk) 09:17, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi OSX,
It's Nim again
Could you tell me the reason why you needed to revert User:EurovisionNim's images. The images were only illustrating the Australian version of cars available. If you want to revert an image you need to tell why you reverted the images. I am not upset in fact I have most of it removed. It can be slightly annoying when you don't put into the edit summary why you reverted it because then users will not know why it had been deleted.
I miss editing Wikipedia and now I have changed the way I edit articles. If you can could you tell me in brief why you reverted my car photos off Wikipedia without putting it in the edit summary. If you can tell me that would be excellent.
- 60.224.249.55 ( talk) 04:03, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Just thought I'd drop you a line - the IP editor who kept changing the size on the Opel Corsa article was also active in the same vein on the Ford Sierra article. That page has just had protection lifted, and straight away the IP changed the car size again with no discussion. It's not unreasonable to assume that they may appear back on the Corsa page as well at some point. Chaheel Riens ( talk) 12:43, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
I found it here. This could lead to other internet based sources of GM-Holden platform information. ( Regushee ( talk) 15:57, 5 January 2015 (UTC))
Thank you very much for the The Original Barnstar! I appreciate!-- Arado ( talk) 18:13, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Is User talk:OSX II linked to you in any way or just a similar name? Stepho talk 07:00, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Oh you're a fucking idiot bastard right?! Many of Wikipedia users thinks that my editing is very very very constructive only you're who is too far from constructive comment to any other editing. Wikipedia is free to edit as we are here members and have sufficient knowledge to give information to world citizens am I right hot damn bastard?? James British 05:00, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
I do agree that the citation needed tag should only be used in a article, but there is a reason why I placed that tag there. The reason was that, there is a discussion over whether the category page I created named Super cars, should be deleted or not because it does not comply with the classification rules on the wiki project conventions page. This convention that super cars are not a classification is a big problem. Since, on many pages of cars the info box has super car set for its classification, some even have a reference (although those cars may not be on the category page since I did not add all the supercars in the world on that category page yet. ). This also means that the Wikipedia article supercar should also get deleted if it is not a car classification. Also, the convention seems baseless, anyone could have just typed it in, it is like as if some one says that there should not be a category for electric or fuel engines because they are both engines and should be in a common category named engines. That would not make any sense, so please consider that decision that you made, if you do not want to undo your edit I do not mind, just tell me the reason why. Please respond soon. Thank you. Doorknob747 01:32, 9 March 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doorknob747 ( talk • contribs)
What was the reason to remove Template:Distinguish from the Toyota Land Cruiser page? Salmin ( talk) 04:53, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This user has been awarded with the Big interest in car award. |
Doorknob747 20:35, 19 March 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doorknob747 ( talk • contribs)
Hi, sorry, looks like I am unintentionally keeping you busy tonight undoing my work! I guess I only briefly contemplated the merit of crowding the main Commodore page with more photos or removing non-Chevy Omega photos... no issue with either of your reverts of course. On the Omega article though, why feature a VX Holden when there's a VTII Chevy available? Surely that's fit to feature in that article somewhere? CtrlXctrlV ( talk) 12:24, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
@ CtrlXctrlV, the images at Wiki Commons have now been deleted. I strongly suggest that you DO NOT upload anymore copyright violations in the future. I have not filed any formal complaint this time, but if it happens again you will leave me with no choice but to do this. You will probably end up with a block.
Should you wish to use an image found somewhere on the internet that is not licensed under a compatible Wiki license please ask me to assist you with the OTRS work required to get the appropriate permissions. Regards, OSX ( talk • contributions) 07:28, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, looks like your photo renaming caused some pix to disappear, from here Tickford Vehicle Engineering and whatever other page used the same material. CtrlXctrlV ( talk) 13:08, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello. I know the Ford Ranger in its first generation was basically a 1983-1989/1990 compact pickup truck. I also know that the Ford Ranger in its first generation and in production as early as January 1991. That's all I know where I see commercials off of youtube so I think the Ford Ranger ended production of the first generation in 1991 of early January. So basically the Rangers model years of the first generation was 1983 to 1989/1990. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.4.56.149 ( talk) 00:38, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Better be prepared, as the Perodua Myvi article might get vandalized within the week due to a controversial car accident in Malaysia. - Areaseven ( talk) 16:33, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX, Hope you are well and thanks for the comment about my improvements of my photos,
I recently purchased a DSLR so that might've been the reason why they are at excellent quality.
Now down to business :D
I am looking back at the following articles: Holden Commodore (VE) and Chevrolet Omega
Now both of them have the following image: File:2007 Holden Berlina (VE MY07) sedan (2007-03-08).jpg which I think it is at low quality that I do not think is the best because it only shows the rear view of the car. Now have a look at the following image I photographed: File:2006-2009 Holden VE Berlina sedan (2015-05-29).JPG - I believe that image is better because it shows the front view and also shows the sides. I read WP:CARPIX and photographed the car accordingly. I waited for the sun to dim and when there was only a little bit of sun I took a photograph of the car.
Please OSX, could you find which is the better image and reply.
Thanks and keep up the good work EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 07:23, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX. In this comment, did you mean "I'm not proposing a deletion"? Regards. DH85868993 ( talk) 00:29, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX,
Well done on uploading some more Australian new car photos. Looks like you stole the job from me.
I will be heading to singapore and vietnam on a holiday so I will be photographing cars to add to illustrate the different cars available in Singapore and Vietnam. Please if possible can you reply on my talk page and tell me which cars I should be photographing. I will then take those photos of these cars and add them to Wikipedia. I will be taking my Canon DSLR and take photographs of those cars.
If you reply on my talkpage then what I can do is write down the cars and then when I head on holidays on December 22 - January 18 I will if possible photograph those cars and add them to Wikipedia.
Be aware that I will be picking up the pieces of the cars you forgot to photograph.
However if you wish to reply on your talkpage it is not a problem.
Anyway please keep up the great work and happy editing and photographing EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 08:34, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
You do realize that all of those trim lists are unsourced, right? And that they're UK specific, which isn't appropriate. Plus, the way they're written looks almost exactly like the brochure, which makes me think it is probably a copyvio. So why on earth are you trying to edit-war to keep in totally unsourced information that is UK specific and contains OR commentary to boot? Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 00:38, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX, I don't know about you, but I strongly dislike using a spacer (comma or space) whenever there is a four-digit number. That is, I would like to write 1998 and 12,043, but never 1,998. I found that the tag "comma=5" allows for just that. Now, since the WP style guide says that the spacer is optional for four-digit numerals, is there any way to make a bot add "|comma=5" to all conversion templates used on automotive pages? I reckon a conversation before such a large scale edit is carried out would be good, I just wanted to know a) if it is possible and b) if anyone agreed with me on this. Cheers, Mr.choppers | ✎ 16:36, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I hope I haven't wasted my time but I just created a new page on Corsa Specialised Vehicles. I just realised its contents correctly states "Specialised" but the title reads "Special"! How can it be fixed? And can you independently review it so that it remains permanently published? Cheers CtrlXctrlV ( talk) 16:25, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
I didn't even do anything wrong, i was jus saying its the de facto replacement. no reason to edit it out. if you want to edit it out, edit out the part where it says the buick verano replaced it in canada. -- 50.180.208.181 ( talk) 21:22, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Any reason to do this? © Tbhotch ™ ( en-2.5). 02:57, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX,
A lot of your images have been placed however it is cluttering the articles. Some images are fine but is it alright if I use my Canon EOS 700D and photograph the cars in my Nedlands area and they turn up as high quality could I please replace them.
I would suggest having a few images removed but I do like your images with the Panasonic LX100. My aim is to photograph the Toyota Camry facelift but the front view so if you could kindly leave that out if possible. I live not far from a dealership and a mate and myself are catching up over the weekend so I will be photographing more cars. I will be aiming at the newer cars like the Mercedes, BMW, Ford and all the other cars I find.
One question - if my images are of same quality do you have a problem with me replacing your image.
Kind Regards -- EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 05:58, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX,
I hope you are well. I am focusing now on the Ford Falcon (AU) article. Your image File:2000-2001 Ford AUII Falcon Futura 01.jpg is only showing the rear view of the Futura whilst my image File:2000-2001 Ford AUII Falcon Futura Station Wagon 01.jpg is showing the front view of the car. Do you think my image is better than yours in showing the view of the Ford Falcon AUII Futura. Cheers -- EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 05:35, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX, Again we chat!! I am a bit curious as I have been for a while. Is the car photography you do a hobby or is it a job. Regards -- EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 11:33, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
(Classic reply above haha). Just wondering, now that I discovered a/the official webpage for recalls by manufacturers, do you think it would be a waste of time or be frowned upon just adding it as an "external link" at the bottom of the articles? CtrlXctrlV ( talk) 04:11, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
I find them really boring, but it's nearly impossible to find the specs of the everyday imports from the seventies and eighties. I will probably buy a few more old buyer's guides to get some more info. Thanks for noticing! Mr.choppers | ✎ 14:51, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kia. Since you had some involvement with the Kia redirect (the move discussion), you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Godsy( TALK CONT) 21:03, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Please do not edit Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.39.15.225 ( talk) 15:06, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi, firstly, I hope I won't have caused any hassles with the Chevrolet Omega re-gig of the photos - just pointing this out, out of courtesy. Secondly, apologies for the extra work I seemed to have caused you lately (e.g. had no idea you should not bold a link, but you learn every day... just unfortunate there's inconsistencies on here). Thirdly, the HSV cars and especially the VN GTS. I have seen on Holden forums that the NZ model was definitely an HSV. Why do you say otherwise? And I think in the VN article, some HSV special editions may have been deleted since my edits. The approach I took was to list as "HSV" any car by them, even if "Holden" badged (the most notorious being the VN Group A SS SV). Is this perhaps where we differ on the "LE"? If it is Holden badged but HSV built, it should be attributed to HSV like the SS above. Not being argumentative, just trying to understand as I just relied on (consistent) online resources to reconcile the HSV list, and you might have superior knowledge and resources. CtrlXctrlV ( talk) 17:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX,
Long time since we haven't had a chat.
I am just curious to find out how you manage to get the cars that have had damage back to factory specifications on Photoshop.
For example some files below:
Can you please give me instructions and uploading on Wikimedia Commons, would that be against the rules for overwriting files, please can you tell me, thanks -- EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 10:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
I have come across rather unusual information regarding development histories of various vehicles manufactured during late 20th century and 2000s. Japanese patents have now given a clearer idea of some past models development timelines. This website has full patent filings of various Japanese and European brands, including some with actual approval dates. Apparently it takes a very long time between design freeze and actual launch at Toyota, despite how they "officially" pretend otherwise for marketing purposes. The E120 Corolla Altis/U.S. Corolla was already on by July 22, 1999 and designed many months earlier, despite being launched in late 2001/March 2002.
E110 Corolla was a 1992 design effort, even though some markets had barely received the E100 Corolla that autumn. I work in this area at Jaguar Land Rover (mostly design/production feasibility engineering), so this stuff interests me. The XV20 Camry looked like this in January-February 1994. The Camry Solara design was finished about 2.5 - 3 years before going on sale in August 1998, as shown by this January 18, 1996 patent. For patents sometimes a CGI or CAD file is used or an actual photo of a clay model or master model. In cases of the former, it is almost immediate following design programme approval. The latter or with a running prototype, usually is some significant time afterward (months to 1 year+).---- Carmaker1 ( talk) 06:34, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX,
I went recently on a school camp and as a mate passed a soccer ball to play a game, I dropped my compact camera and is unable to be used. I will not be very active in photographing cars in Australia. I will be going to Vietnam and Singapore to take the photographs of cars.
I am going to be purchasing a new camera, an advanced compact, i.e. Nikon Coolpix S7000 or Panasonic Lumix TZ 70. The camera is too expensive to repair and I only have a DSLR however this is used mainly for serious photography.
I will do my best to get back to the project but i have to get a new one to resume photographing cars in Australia. My primary focus will be on Vietnamese and Singapore cars. Kind regards, -- EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 08:53, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX,
Thank you for photographing more cars. I am struggling to find some old cars in my neighbourhood. I am in Nedlands and it is difficult to find those old timers. I am still photographing cars, but not as often as I did before with my compact camera, as I do not use my iPhone as it takes low quality shots. I was lucky to find a Series II Hyundai i30 on Verdun Street as me and my friend were walking around as he has never seen Nedlands.
I am still taking photos of cars with my DSLR and by December should be able to acquire an advanced compact as the camera was not fixable. Have a nice day -- EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 01:59, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! Though I haven't been completely gone, I just have been editing from IPs instead of my account. Karrmann ( talk) 06:57, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
How did you make change the font on your table of contents of this page? Catmando999 Check out his talk page! 20:49, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX,
User:Davey2010, thinks that File:2015 Ford Mondeo 1.6 Zetec Econetic TDCi Estate (16922091829).jpg is better than File:2015 Ford Mondeo (MD) Ambiente station wagon (2015-11-14) 01.jpg. I do believe that my image is better, albeit its brightness. I do believe mine is better because it is better quality and it does not have the other cars surrounding it. Could you have a look and judge through which of the images are better because I do believe mine is the best and I do not want to go into an edit war and end up blocked.
Please can you help and figure out which one is the best, Thanks -- EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 01:16, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX,
About Overlaet's image of the Ford Mondeo rear view, Davey2010 reverted it. I do believe my image File:2015 Ford Mondeo (MD) Ambiente station wagon (2015-11-14) 02.jpg is better than his image, because of there are no heavy distracting backgrounds. I would like you to decide which is the better one. Thanks -- EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 09:53, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX, Re this edit [4] - Infobox spacing is the norm here and to be honest I assumed it looked okay on them all ?, I use Chrome and everything's spaced fine, Then again I guess if you're using a laptop with a lower screen resolution then it perhaps does look weird, Anyway thanks, – Davey2010 Talk 02:19, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX,
I understand you're a prolific Flickr user, uploading plenty of pictures of cars. However, I'm having great difficulties when it comes to searching through the "Melbourne" tag for free images of Melbourne, its surroundings, beaches, architecture etc. – and instead of quickly finding said images, I'm constantly finding a barrage of images of cars. Would you be able to, if possible, cease tagging said uploads of yours under the "Melbourne" tag, as it is proving to be quite frustrating navigating through the tag to find images for Wikipedia.
A fellow Melburnian, — MelbourneStar☆ talk 08:25, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Please stop reverting changes I made, except it really needs to change. Juan20102006 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:08, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi, remember the page Suzuki XL-7? Well,the second generation was really called "XL7". That´s why I created a page called Suzuki XL7 that did not redirect. And I also used it to put it for main article in the page Suzuki XL-7 About Holden Captiva pages: I created those pages. Please stop changing redirects. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Juan20102006 ( talk • contribs) 22:20, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX,
Could you please upload some more images from jeremyg3030. I am struggling to find photos of cars necessary for the article. He has some new images of the cars that I can use to replace the poor quality images. I cannot seem to activate my Flickr to Commons, as it requires a lot of work and I am unsure how to activate it.
Could you please do me a favour and upload all the car images from jeremyg3030 so I can use it on the articles, to replace the low quality images, Thanks, and have a nice day -- EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 09:00, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Suzuki Cultus. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit-warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 174.23.115.41 ( talk) 08:26, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Reversion has failed, Discussion is obviously failing. Time for an administrator to remove this troll. Stepho talk 11:40, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX,
Thanks for uploading more files. I have never been more appreciated for someone to take the role.
I am going to be heading to Vietnam next week. I am purchasing a Nikon Coolpix S9600, with my grandmother. I have done all the listing of cars in Vietnam that I need for the articles. I would be using a DSLR and Compact to take photos of the cars that are in Vietnam and Singapore which could be of heavy use for the articles as no-one wants to take a photo of cars in Vietnam. The reason I am doing cars in Western Australia is that I would take care of the cars, however in WA it is very sunny and therefore can cause the images to become washed out. In Victoria normally the images are better quality as the weather is a lot of the time cloudy.
I would have to give up the congrats to you mate, however I will be carefully looking for cars in original condition as I did some research and found that cars in Asia are customised which can hinder the quality.
Have a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year :) -- EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 02:23, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi OSX,
I purchased a new camera yesterday. The model is a Nikon Coolpix S7000. I am back in action with the car photography. I also am catching up with a girl that I really like over the holidays so I hope to take some photos of cars when she and I go for a walk together. She told me that she wants me to find some cars around where she lives as she said that Mosman Park, Western Australia is a good hotspot as well as Cottesloe because that is where most of the well maintained cars are. I have done a lot of work looking for cars around my suburbs. I hope to find some cars that is needed for the article on Wikipedia around WA.
I would like to wish you the best of the festive season :) -- EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 02:09, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
|
Thanks for all your help on the 'pedia!
|
Hi OSX,
I would like to wish you and your family a Merry Christmas. Hope for the best in the new year
Please place one on my talkpage please, if you wish. :) -- EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 22:48, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
OSX,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. –
Davey2010
Merry Xmas / Happy New Year
11:13, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
I have created a wiki markup version of File:Australian large car sales 1991 onwards.png using Template:Line chart. Looking to see if others are happy to switch from the image to the wiki markup, which will be placed in its own template. Thanks. – Ky ta bu 00:41, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Since we have articles with titles such as Toyota Corolla (E80), what do you think of having redirect pages such as Lexus GX (J120) that links to Lexus GX#J120? The idea is that we can just link to Lexus GX (J120) regardless of whether it is an individual page or a link to a section within another page. It also means that we can start an article with one page covering all models, then later split it up into individual generations without breaking links. Of course this requires us to build up a lot of redirection pages for existing articles but I can do that. Stepho talk 01:45, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
I reverted his edit to Lexus GX mostly to prod him into providing references himself. He added figures to a number of Toyota articles without references and so far has ignored my request to add references. Hopefully we can train him to do it right instead of just being a fly by nighter that relies on others to clean up after him. Stepho talk 01:37, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Why did you insult me about the pics of the 5th generation Celica? Do you think the pic of your red SX (ST184) with black car in the background is better? Because it's an Aussie spec? Don't you realize that for the pre-facelift, there is a light blue US-spec 1.6 ST (AT180), and the higher model grade is GT-Four? I admit that the pic of red JDM GT-Four A that I took is not so good to be displayed, since it's a pre-facelift but has facelift hood emblem. The pic of my grey metallic All-Trac is a much better one, and currently the black Carlos Sainz model from Italy is the only available pic of the top of the line model which should represents the whole 5th generation (put in the info box). Celica21gtfour 2:00, 8 January 2016