Hi, I really like this script, it's really helpful! I have a minor concern about the colours. They are currently a little bit to dark and make the references hard to read, and have a few accesibility concerns. Have you considered making them lighter? If you don't want to, would you mind if I forked the script to change the colours? — Berrely • Talk∕ Contribs 16:47, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
window.citeHighlighterLighterColors = true;
to the top of your common.js file. If you want me to tweak any of the colors, let me know. You can use
Google's color picker to let me know what shade you want (the "hex" number is what I need). Hope that helps. –
Novem Linguae (
talk)
02:15, 9 June 2021 (UTC)This is a self-publishing site, probably needs to be highlighted as generally unreliable. —valereee ( talk) 14:36, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
isssuu is a publishing platform, so each publication that uses it should be considered by itself, rather than as a group. Vexations ( talk) 19:57, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
maybe this could support the citation style used in articles such as Ike for President (advertisement) and C. J. Cregg? (also, I greatly appreciate the needle/haystack variable :D clever clever) theleekycauldron ( talk • contribs) (she/ they) 04:26, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
Let's say we want to add the references in this Swedish list and many other Swedish sources to this list, what is the best way? I guess you don't want us to fork the script to our own copy?
Another question: Would it be possible to make this nice script visible outside of the main name space (in non-articles)? For testing and demonstration purposes.
A third question: Many scientific journals have Danish Bibliometric Research Indicator level (P1240) journal rank (score 1, 2 or 3 based on journal impact factor/citation analysis) at Wikidata on my initiative. For example Nature (Q180445) has score 3 out of three. I suggest that all three scores should be dark green - not only medical journals. In non-medicin fields, secondary/meta studies are typically not required. Many of the scientific publications also have other types of scores in review score (P444) that may be useful.SHould the list of scores be imported manually into this list, or should it be imported automatically from Wikidata? Tomastvivlaren ( talk) 21:07, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
;Reliable
or ;No consensus
or ;Unreliable
on a line to indicate the reliability, then *
[1]
on a line below it to indicate the website. Then let me know and I can import it into CiteHighlighter using an offline tool I made.window.citeHighlighterHighlightEverything = true;
to the top of your common.js. May increase lag on some pages though.Hi again! Thanks for tackling my previous thing :) The program seems to be throwing a red flag for worldradiohistory.com over at KXRR, despite the source not being listed in the program – what's going on there? theleekycauldron ( talk • contribs) (she/ they) 22:24, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Line 60 contains an error; colors
should be this.colors
. See
GH#135.
elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him)
03:31, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
I was looking at draft:Creepy Nuts and I think the script highlights one of the headers in the contents. Image example link: https://imgur.com/a/W6BXZYq BhamBoi ( talk) 18:02, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Another weird problem, at w:Draft:Me_vs._Myself#References, there is a highlighted link within a differently-highlighted ref... Example image: https://imgur.com/a/Y4S1eCV BhamBoi ( talk) 19:11, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
When viewing this for some reason the script will highlight the following things: the Draft assessment icon, the pagieviews link, the full page statistics link, the links to view the current and prior revision, the edit button on both revisions, the undo button, my talk page and the IPs talk page, the rollback button, the previous edit button, and the changes since my last edit button (as well as the "welcome" button from Twinkle).On the draft the script will also highlight the center of the image (presumably where the link would be if it weren't displaying the image). All of these are highlighted in orange. This doesn't happen on every article either. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 21:00, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
Should all of McClatchy's newspapers be added as RS? Every time it's mentioned briefly on RSN, its saying it's not unreliable, but maybe a little bit more consensus should be reached and/or only the News Agency and not their subsidiary papers should be added? BhamBoi ( talk) 04:36, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
I feel as though it's an important distinction between the quality, same as the light green/dark green distinction. DecafPotato ( talk) 05:56, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Digital Trends is currently highlighted in Orange (see Draft:The Crew Motorfest) however WP:VG/S shows that it's reliable based on 2 discussions. This should be changed to be highlighted in green. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:50, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
inquirer.com should be treated as generally reliable, I assume? theleekycauldron ( talk • contribs) (she/her) 22:09, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
@ Novem Linguae I listed some unreliable sources at add to this script at User:137a/sandbox/sources. 137a ( talk • edits) 16:09, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
* https://abc.com/ comment goes here
As you probably know,
Science is a top-tier academic journal and is likely okay to be listed here considering is it on
WP:NPPSG. But the link added to the highlighter is
sciencemag
Also, what about the URL for Wired UK? BhamBoi ( talk) 18:47, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
thoughtco should be yellow, not green. it falls under dotdash (about.com). lettherebedarklight 晚安 08:00, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Some otherwise-reliable websites let users post reviews about video games and movies, stuff life that. Here is an example. 137a ( talk • edits) 16:11, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Hey Novem, have you added the links from here? Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#Topic-specific pages BhamBoi ( talk) 17:25, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Hey, I edit in French Wikipedia as well, this would be a useful tool there, does the script work on other language versions of wiki? Oaktree b ( talk) 01:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
importScript('en:User:Novem Linguae/Scripts/CiteHighlgihter.js');
to your common.js. –
Novem Linguae (
talk)
14:02, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
The AP's site is generally highlighted green, however press releases (under the pattern apnews.com/press-release/pr-newswire/), such as [3], should probably note be. LittlePuppers ( talk) 01:48, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that Kirkus Reviews has been marked red on articles despite WP:KIRKUS suggesting that it is generally reliable. Thank you for this great tool! ⇒ Lucie Person (talk| contribs) 01:55, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
hi, the guardian is marked yellow despite rsp and nppsg saying it is reliable. ltbdl ( talk) 02:21, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi! I'm not sure why, but Politico is not highlighted by CH. It has an entry at WP:RSPSS. I noticed this on this article. Other sources are still appropriately highlighted. Actualcpscm ( talk) 15:52, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello
Novem Linguae, thank you for writing this script 🙏, as an AfC reviewer (and formerly
NPR) and an editor who works heavily on music, I noticed the script does not recognize roughly 98% of the sources listed under
WP:RSMUSIC (it highlights
Billboard and maybe few others), and also marks
Rolling Stone as marginally reliable or no census.
Could you please adjust the script to recognize the reliable sources and of course unreliable source listed under RSMUSIC, thank you.
dxneo (
talk)
13:23, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello NL, I've just noticed that the above mentioned domains are now highlighted yellow (from green), is there something I'm missing? dxneo ( talk) 05:47, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi Novem Linguae, I took a deeper look at Billboard sites that were added to your script and found Brazil is owned by Penske (same as US) so is under the same editorial board ("While Billboard takes on editorial claims...") but the others are brand licensing agreements with different ownership: Japan (see bottom right), Argentina, Arabia. Looking at WP:CHARTS, Billboard Japan, Brazil and Argentina are listed but not Arabia. Just an FYI, Forbes is another one that has licensing agreements to use their name. It appears the script only lists Forbes.com but something to be aware of.
As for the ones from WP:WikiProject Africa/Africa Sources List, I noticed this discussion back in 2021 where a couple editors urged caution because it was not clear they had gone through any discussion. Looking at now, it appears to be a mixed bag. S0091 ( talk) 15:07, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello -
The Express Tribune
tribune
Hi @ Novem Linguae! Dark mode support is rolling out shortly! Could you modify this script to work with it? I think the quickest way to do this is by adding the notheme class whenever you add the classes cite-highlighter-red, cite-highlighter-yellow etc.. Let me know if I can help in any way! Jon (WMF) ( talk) 22:30, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi! I've come here from Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#panarmenian.net. As far as I can see there has been no community consensus to declare this source unreliable. Unless I'm missing something, could you remove this source from the script's list of unreliable sources? Alaexis ¿question? 22:02, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I really like this script, it's really helpful! I have a minor concern about the colours. They are currently a little bit to dark and make the references hard to read, and have a few accesibility concerns. Have you considered making them lighter? If you don't want to, would you mind if I forked the script to change the colours? — Berrely • Talk∕ Contribs 16:47, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
window.citeHighlighterLighterColors = true;
to the top of your common.js file. If you want me to tweak any of the colors, let me know. You can use
Google's color picker to let me know what shade you want (the "hex" number is what I need). Hope that helps. –
Novem Linguae (
talk)
02:15, 9 June 2021 (UTC)This is a self-publishing site, probably needs to be highlighted as generally unreliable. —valereee ( talk) 14:36, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
isssuu is a publishing platform, so each publication that uses it should be considered by itself, rather than as a group. Vexations ( talk) 19:57, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
maybe this could support the citation style used in articles such as Ike for President (advertisement) and C. J. Cregg? (also, I greatly appreciate the needle/haystack variable :D clever clever) theleekycauldron ( talk • contribs) (she/ they) 04:26, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
Let's say we want to add the references in this Swedish list and many other Swedish sources to this list, what is the best way? I guess you don't want us to fork the script to our own copy?
Another question: Would it be possible to make this nice script visible outside of the main name space (in non-articles)? For testing and demonstration purposes.
A third question: Many scientific journals have Danish Bibliometric Research Indicator level (P1240) journal rank (score 1, 2 or 3 based on journal impact factor/citation analysis) at Wikidata on my initiative. For example Nature (Q180445) has score 3 out of three. I suggest that all three scores should be dark green - not only medical journals. In non-medicin fields, secondary/meta studies are typically not required. Many of the scientific publications also have other types of scores in review score (P444) that may be useful.SHould the list of scores be imported manually into this list, or should it be imported automatically from Wikidata? Tomastvivlaren ( talk) 21:07, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
;Reliable
or ;No consensus
or ;Unreliable
on a line to indicate the reliability, then *
[1]
on a line below it to indicate the website. Then let me know and I can import it into CiteHighlighter using an offline tool I made.window.citeHighlighterHighlightEverything = true;
to the top of your common.js. May increase lag on some pages though.Hi again! Thanks for tackling my previous thing :) The program seems to be throwing a red flag for worldradiohistory.com over at KXRR, despite the source not being listed in the program – what's going on there? theleekycauldron ( talk • contribs) (she/ they) 22:24, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Line 60 contains an error; colors
should be this.colors
. See
GH#135.
elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him)
03:31, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
I was looking at draft:Creepy Nuts and I think the script highlights one of the headers in the contents. Image example link: https://imgur.com/a/W6BXZYq BhamBoi ( talk) 18:02, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Another weird problem, at w:Draft:Me_vs._Myself#References, there is a highlighted link within a differently-highlighted ref... Example image: https://imgur.com/a/Y4S1eCV BhamBoi ( talk) 19:11, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
When viewing this for some reason the script will highlight the following things: the Draft assessment icon, the pagieviews link, the full page statistics link, the links to view the current and prior revision, the edit button on both revisions, the undo button, my talk page and the IPs talk page, the rollback button, the previous edit button, and the changes since my last edit button (as well as the "welcome" button from Twinkle).On the draft the script will also highlight the center of the image (presumably where the link would be if it weren't displaying the image). All of these are highlighted in orange. This doesn't happen on every article either. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 21:00, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
Should all of McClatchy's newspapers be added as RS? Every time it's mentioned briefly on RSN, its saying it's not unreliable, but maybe a little bit more consensus should be reached and/or only the News Agency and not their subsidiary papers should be added? BhamBoi ( talk) 04:36, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
I feel as though it's an important distinction between the quality, same as the light green/dark green distinction. DecafPotato ( talk) 05:56, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Digital Trends is currently highlighted in Orange (see Draft:The Crew Motorfest) however WP:VG/S shows that it's reliable based on 2 discussions. This should be changed to be highlighted in green. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:50, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
inquirer.com should be treated as generally reliable, I assume? theleekycauldron ( talk • contribs) (she/her) 22:09, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
@ Novem Linguae I listed some unreliable sources at add to this script at User:137a/sandbox/sources. 137a ( talk • edits) 16:09, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
* https://abc.com/ comment goes here
As you probably know,
Science is a top-tier academic journal and is likely okay to be listed here considering is it on
WP:NPPSG. But the link added to the highlighter is
sciencemag
Also, what about the URL for Wired UK? BhamBoi ( talk) 18:47, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
thoughtco should be yellow, not green. it falls under dotdash (about.com). lettherebedarklight 晚安 08:00, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Some otherwise-reliable websites let users post reviews about video games and movies, stuff life that. Here is an example. 137a ( talk • edits) 16:11, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Hey Novem, have you added the links from here? Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#Topic-specific pages BhamBoi ( talk) 17:25, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Hey, I edit in French Wikipedia as well, this would be a useful tool there, does the script work on other language versions of wiki? Oaktree b ( talk) 01:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
importScript('en:User:Novem Linguae/Scripts/CiteHighlgihter.js');
to your common.js. –
Novem Linguae (
talk)
14:02, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
The AP's site is generally highlighted green, however press releases (under the pattern apnews.com/press-release/pr-newswire/), such as [3], should probably note be. LittlePuppers ( talk) 01:48, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that Kirkus Reviews has been marked red on articles despite WP:KIRKUS suggesting that it is generally reliable. Thank you for this great tool! ⇒ Lucie Person (talk| contribs) 01:55, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
hi, the guardian is marked yellow despite rsp and nppsg saying it is reliable. ltbdl ( talk) 02:21, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi! I'm not sure why, but Politico is not highlighted by CH. It has an entry at WP:RSPSS. I noticed this on this article. Other sources are still appropriately highlighted. Actualcpscm ( talk) 15:52, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello
Novem Linguae, thank you for writing this script 🙏, as an AfC reviewer (and formerly
NPR) and an editor who works heavily on music, I noticed the script does not recognize roughly 98% of the sources listed under
WP:RSMUSIC (it highlights
Billboard and maybe few others), and also marks
Rolling Stone as marginally reliable or no census.
Could you please adjust the script to recognize the reliable sources and of course unreliable source listed under RSMUSIC, thank you.
dxneo (
talk)
13:23, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello NL, I've just noticed that the above mentioned domains are now highlighted yellow (from green), is there something I'm missing? dxneo ( talk) 05:47, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi Novem Linguae, I took a deeper look at Billboard sites that were added to your script and found Brazil is owned by Penske (same as US) so is under the same editorial board ("While Billboard takes on editorial claims...") but the others are brand licensing agreements with different ownership: Japan (see bottom right), Argentina, Arabia. Looking at WP:CHARTS, Billboard Japan, Brazil and Argentina are listed but not Arabia. Just an FYI, Forbes is another one that has licensing agreements to use their name. It appears the script only lists Forbes.com but something to be aware of.
As for the ones from WP:WikiProject Africa/Africa Sources List, I noticed this discussion back in 2021 where a couple editors urged caution because it was not clear they had gone through any discussion. Looking at now, it appears to be a mixed bag. S0091 ( talk) 15:07, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello -
The Express Tribune
tribune
Hi @ Novem Linguae! Dark mode support is rolling out shortly! Could you modify this script to work with it? I think the quickest way to do this is by adding the notheme class whenever you add the classes cite-highlighter-red, cite-highlighter-yellow etc.. Let me know if I can help in any way! Jon (WMF) ( talk) 22:30, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi! I've come here from Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#panarmenian.net. As far as I can see there has been no community consensus to declare this source unreliable. Unless I'm missing something, could you remove this source from the script's list of unreliable sources? Alaexis ¿question? 22:02, 6 July 2024 (UTC)