![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I think there is a problem with Miyajima, Hiroshima page. I think there needs to be details about the township on this page. The page refers to the "former" town, but the town still exists (ie the buildings). What has happened is the delegation of the town has now joined with another city. Whats up skip ( talk) 05:16, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for opening the talk and please feel free to voice you opinion as well. I do not seek to destroy other peoples good faith (hard!) work however I found the choices made very "unhelpful" and in literally no way improving.
I myself now the table-style very well - however i don't think that we should only write for people who already "know stuff" we should try to keep it KISS principle.
Btw: I was aware of the 3 edit rule ;) I just don't like people undoing me after I wrote a good explanation (and they don't)...
My regards 79.192.239.160 ( talk) 00:02, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Are you so into this that you had to do an indefinite protect? I'm not trying to be rude, but while you're at it discussing new ideas for the table, I'd strongly suggest that you revert to the old table which has stood for years. The current table does not show well in any browser and the old one was very satisfactory all the time that I used it.--10:45, 9 July 2009 (UTC) —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
59.96.141.146 (
talk)
Okay, I finally looked up the 穣 in your signature, and chuckled for a minute. But I gotta ask, of all the kanji for じょう (or じょ), why that one? — Quasirandom ( talk) 05:01, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Good morning. You recently made a cogent and articulate comment at WT:NOT on the topic of plot summaries. Would you consider joining the effort at Wikipedia:Plot-only description of fictional works?
The goal is to more fully explain all the nuance and detail about dealing with plot summaries without bloating WP:NOT any more than it already is. In that regard, this page is intended to parallel WP:WINAD, a drill-down page which very successfully elaborates on and clarifies WP:NOTDICDEF.
Thanks in advance for any thoughts you might have. Rossami (talk) 14:12, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for working on the UAA backlog. Seems like lots of admins must be on vacation. Some of my notes from last night are still there. ありがとうございます 7 talk | Δ | 02:17, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey Joe. Thanks for the the Kamon Tatsuo article. I haven't heard that name in a while, but it sure brings back memories. The article does not really mention anything to the fact that his music is known for its humor. I have always considered him to be the "Weird Al" Yankovic of Japan. Unfortunately I do not have any references to contribute, though. As always, thanks for your many contributions. Regards, Bendono ( talk) 03:54, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
If you can have a spare time, would you evaluate the two links from Korean Tourism Organization and Seoul Metropolitan Government? Ronz has accused me of restoring "spam links" [1] [2] to Insadong one of favorite tourist zones in Seoul, but I've used sources from the sites for DYKs, and reviewers confirmed them as "reliable sites". Dekkappai saw his visits to my talk page regardless of my pleas not to visit my talk page, and he lived in South Korea, so he edited to remove the accusation from the article. Ronz violated 3RR today, but he reverted his edit after he seemed to realize that, so I'm not gonna report him to AN3 board. I just need your objective evaluations on the article's status quo. Thanks.-- Caspian blue 21:32, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
"Ronz has accused me of restoring 'spam links'" Let's look at the facts:
I don't see any such accusations. I see a misunderstanding by Caspian blue, his advise-giving in response, his accusations of disruption, and more advise-giving. All in edit summaries. -- Ronz ( talk) 21:51, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Hmm..Sorry, Nihonjoe for being dragged into the dispute. I just needed your objective evaluation on the two sites. However, I might have brought to AN3 board, since Ronz clearly violated 3RR instead of the generosity.
What's more, I explicitly pointed out the misunderstanding and apologized for any confustion caused by my edits.
[7]. This apology wasn't taken well
[8]. --
Ronz (
talk)
22:11, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Yep. I would have refactored if given a chance.
Meanwhile, by taking sides in this dispute it has encouraged more statements like those already used to attack meyou appear to be encouraging statements such as: (refactored 7/10)
-- Ronz ( talk) 21:34, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
You're right, I should've not brought the matter on your talk page, but gone to RS board instead and discussed with him calmly. I am sorry for causing the trouble on your page, and I apologize for that. I felt cornered and just needed a 3rd opinion on the sites. Admin GTBacchus who knows both of us seemed inactive at that time and you were there. In the meantime, the article of Insadong is now in good shape by Dekkappai and Bendono's nice expansions with many reliable sources other than the two sites. Bendono was also helping in a similar discussion with Ronz at BoA, so he seemed to see another dispute at Insadong. User:MS, the highly established content builder with 5 GAs and 1FL is challenged by Ronz for the interpretation on WP:EL and WP:SPAM that I also can not agree. Perhaps, there also requires your 3 opinion. Anyway, I really appreciate your help. Thanks again.-- Caspian blue 05:38, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Please explain yourself or apologize for your threat to block me for supposed incivilities here on your talk page that were state were "completely unacceptable".
I'm at a loss as to why you've decided to threaten me for supposed incivilities that you deem "completely unacceptable". Could you explain with quotes or diffs as required per
WP:NPA? (refactored 7/10)
I came here to discuss the problems after you gave me a warning. Instead of responding to my concerns, you threaten me? You brought yourself into the situation, and did so unilaterally. In my experience, that was a poor choice on your part. Your continued threats are actionable, but I'm here once again hoping you can discuss the situation this time.
When I came here, I said I would have refactored my comments for which you were concerned if I had been given a chance. I then pointed out the incivilities that you appeared to be overlooking. I provided diffs to point out that accusations against me were without merit. I refactored my comments so to appease the other editors.
As I pointed out, you appeared to encourage attacks against me. I was concerned that your taking sides would encourage more attacks on me. As expected, the attacks continued. (refactored 7/10) I think I handled it well and without "completely unacceptable" incivility as you accuse me. --
Ronz (
talk)
15:28, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
OK-- I'll just butt in once to say: The "personal attacks" above (most of them) were mine. They were of my own volition, and neither NihonJoe nor nor Caspian "encouraged" me. They were my own bluntly-spoken responses to your own actions, and, as I stated on my talk page, the tone was inappropriate, but I still feel the meaning was accurate-- Indeed you seem to confirm their accuracy more and more. During one of our interactions I made reference to Santayana's definition of
fanaticism. I'd really like you to think about this: "redoubling your effort when you have forgotten your aim". Our aim here at Wikipedia is to build an encyclopedia-- a populist encyclopedia of "the sum of human knowledge." This should be the aim of every editor here. We are not here to fight vandals, write a manual of style, build a bureaucracy, fight "spam", delete other people's work, etc. All these things may be necessary at some point, but they should never take the place of, much less interfere with our aim here-- to build an encyclopedia. When you take spam-fighting to the level of removing perfectly good sources, just because you (or some "consensus" of like-minded editors) feel they are used at too many articles, you have forgotten Wikipedia's aim and redoubled your effort. When I've asked you to try to take a constructive hand in some article here, you've taken offense and accused me of "Battling" or "Personal Attacking" or not "Assume Good Faithing"-- or one of those other handy self-made rules so beloved of wiki-cops. Again, I ask this sincerely, just try this: Find a subject area in which you have some interest and try to build up content in that area. Try avoiding Wiki-cop-like activities for a while and work on an article or two. See if your outlook on Wikipedia and your fellow editors doesn't change, and for the better. I've said it before: Researching, writing and building articles here is fun, challenging, and educational. And not only does it make contributing here a pleasure, it should be the aim of every editor here.
Dekkappai (
talk)
17:37, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm trying to write up a new article, but I'm not quite sure what one of the references I want to use says. Could you take a look at the third reference here? I know he's talking about the lyrics of the song, but I'm not sure on the specifics.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙) 03:53, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Quick request. May I have you move Late Old Japanese to Early Middle Japanese? After discussing the issue with an established expert as well as reviewing several other more modern resources, I am slightly updating the nomenclature to match. I'll take care the redirects and updating links. Thanks. Bendono ( talk) 10:07, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
I have unblocked ICSC ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) so that he can change his name. I have counseled him regarding Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations. Fred Talk 01:19, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
hi Nihonjoe,
Anyway no need to apologies, Thank you so much for releasing my block. My name is Rasik Dave and I am working in one of the leading Company. I used to spare time for contributing in our Wikipedia. I request you to represent my candidature for Administrator role. I will definitely add value with additional responsibilities.
Regards....Rasik —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bamnera ( talk • contribs)
Hello Nihonjoe, it appears you have alot of experience with Japan-related articles, so I've come to ask for your opinion about an incident. Referring to these edits on Japanese architecture made by User:Cherry Blossom OK, he claims that Japanese architecture comes from "The Three Kingdoms of Korea", while adding a few printed sources. Since he has only added the titles and names of the "books" (some are in Korean) and not publishing detail (such as ISBN numbers, etc), it would be very difficult to verify if these books actually exist. Also, he has been screwing up the WikiSyntax, and completely ruining the grammar of sentences by copypasting in the strangest of places. What do you think should be done? -- 李博杰 | — Talk contribs email 12:34, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 09:37, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
I need some advice on the articles about present members of the House of Kujō. There is a whole group of these articles, but I can't find any evidence for any of those people (in, admittedly, searches with the Western alphabet, not with the Japanese). Furthermore (and this rang my alarm bells) the source used in e.g. Kyousuke Fujiwara or Sadako Kuroi is a book published before the subjects were even born. The majority of the articles list these persons as if they are royalty (e.g. Fujiwara Manami). It seems strange that I can not find any evidence for any of these people in reliable sources. Can you confirm that a) these are not hoaxes, and b) these people are notable? Thanks! Fram ( talk) 19:04, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
All twenty-one articles plus one template are now at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fujiwara Manami. Fram ( talk) 13:14, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
I thank for your advice. [41] I wrote my opinion about Baekje in TalkPage. when you have spare time, Please write your opinion. -- 青鬼よし ( talk) 14:49, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi Nihonjoe, this user has made an unblock request. In the context of agreeing to a username change, I think an unblock could be possible. What are your thoughts? PhilKnight ( talk) 17:40, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your concern. I appreciate your effort, even if you are Japanese, I think you try to keep neutral stance in my opinion, so i appreciate it. However, your recent 3rr warning is truly inappropriate. [42]
and please try keep an neutral stance, shall you? I think you need more attention to 青鬼よし's POV pushing. and i want discuss with him. and i can discuss it, and i can point out why his POV pushed edit is wrong. till now, 青鬼よし did not satatement why his edit is right at discussion page. Cherry Blossom OK ( talk) 18:57, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi NihonJoe, The article Sairuki Mourino, which you deleted on July 5 (thanks - I had proposed deletion), has been created again, with all-new contents, apparently nonsense. Fg2 ( talk) 21:38, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello Nihonjoe! Recently a Supply Chain Compliance Article was deleted. I'd like to request to get that article back.
Thanks! Jmiles1107 ( talk) 19:40, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
I would suggest you taking a look at the Management Dynamics page. That article references their products and services and has not been flagged for advertising. The Integration Point article is not bias nor an advertisement since there is no mention of any products or services. The article simply talks about managing global trade and how that can be done with any system from any company. I am not an employee, but simply an interested party. The people referenced in the article are reputable amongst US Customs and Border Protection and other US government agencies and are often used as resources when there are questions of global regulatory changes. The materials written by those referenced in the Integration Point article have been published by several publications, which makes them "secondary sources" - what Wiki requires for an article to meet credibility. Wikipedia is a tool where people learn and educate themselves. International Trade is growing and it is important that there are company pages on Wikipedia to support the growth and educate those people who are importing and exporting around the world. Jmiles1107 ( talk) 13:08, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
If you're going to remove templates on pages because they allegedly don't belong there, please replace them with one that should be there. Thanks. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 20:56, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Apologies for the nudge, but I've had a note from Enigmaman about this, which is still outstanding. As you're the reviewing admin, if you have the time are you able to take a final look and close things up? There have been no further responses from the editor. Thanks! EyeSerene talk 08:22, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello Nihonjoe. Cherry Blossom OK destroyed my page. [44] And, he suddenly participated in the article Kofun period in which I participated, and rewound the article the day before when I participated. (He rewound the article until March 15, 2009. [45]) As a result, information accumulated for Five months is being thrown away by Cherry Blossom OK. (The explanation of "Aristocratic system of ancient Japan" and "Famous aristocrats" was thrown away by him.) [46]. Please return the article to the state of "302226007" [47] (14:13, 15 July 2009 ), and protect it. -- 青鬼よし ( talk) 11:37, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi, you say yet they refuse to accept that their username is misleading. I had actually said, in the text that you were responding to I'm pretty sure (after my recent experience) that consensus will be that blocking usernames that are IP addresses is correct. - that's pretty clear that I accept that consensus is against me. I'll try to be clear about what I want - admins block usernames (have done for ages, will continue to do so) that resemble IP addresses. I do not want to change that. I do want to change the text on the policy page, so that it says that admins will block usernames that resemble IP addresses. I hope this helps. Hurr87.113.86.207durr ( talk) 11:44, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
I know you believe you were doing the right thing by blocking User:87.113.86.207 (talk) because his username looked like his IP, but a polite request that he change his username would have done the same thing without biting a newbie. There is a discussion going on at WT:UAA about this. rspεεr ( talk) 16:10, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I think there is a problem with Miyajima, Hiroshima page. I think there needs to be details about the township on this page. The page refers to the "former" town, but the town still exists (ie the buildings). What has happened is the delegation of the town has now joined with another city. Whats up skip ( talk) 05:16, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for opening the talk and please feel free to voice you opinion as well. I do not seek to destroy other peoples good faith (hard!) work however I found the choices made very "unhelpful" and in literally no way improving.
I myself now the table-style very well - however i don't think that we should only write for people who already "know stuff" we should try to keep it KISS principle.
Btw: I was aware of the 3 edit rule ;) I just don't like people undoing me after I wrote a good explanation (and they don't)...
My regards 79.192.239.160 ( talk) 00:02, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Are you so into this that you had to do an indefinite protect? I'm not trying to be rude, but while you're at it discussing new ideas for the table, I'd strongly suggest that you revert to the old table which has stood for years. The current table does not show well in any browser and the old one was very satisfactory all the time that I used it.--10:45, 9 July 2009 (UTC) —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
59.96.141.146 (
talk)
Okay, I finally looked up the 穣 in your signature, and chuckled for a minute. But I gotta ask, of all the kanji for じょう (or じょ), why that one? — Quasirandom ( talk) 05:01, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Good morning. You recently made a cogent and articulate comment at WT:NOT on the topic of plot summaries. Would you consider joining the effort at Wikipedia:Plot-only description of fictional works?
The goal is to more fully explain all the nuance and detail about dealing with plot summaries without bloating WP:NOT any more than it already is. In that regard, this page is intended to parallel WP:WINAD, a drill-down page which very successfully elaborates on and clarifies WP:NOTDICDEF.
Thanks in advance for any thoughts you might have. Rossami (talk) 14:12, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for working on the UAA backlog. Seems like lots of admins must be on vacation. Some of my notes from last night are still there. ありがとうございます 7 talk | Δ | 02:17, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey Joe. Thanks for the the Kamon Tatsuo article. I haven't heard that name in a while, but it sure brings back memories. The article does not really mention anything to the fact that his music is known for its humor. I have always considered him to be the "Weird Al" Yankovic of Japan. Unfortunately I do not have any references to contribute, though. As always, thanks for your many contributions. Regards, Bendono ( talk) 03:54, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
If you can have a spare time, would you evaluate the two links from Korean Tourism Organization and Seoul Metropolitan Government? Ronz has accused me of restoring "spam links" [1] [2] to Insadong one of favorite tourist zones in Seoul, but I've used sources from the sites for DYKs, and reviewers confirmed them as "reliable sites". Dekkappai saw his visits to my talk page regardless of my pleas not to visit my talk page, and he lived in South Korea, so he edited to remove the accusation from the article. Ronz violated 3RR today, but he reverted his edit after he seemed to realize that, so I'm not gonna report him to AN3 board. I just need your objective evaluations on the article's status quo. Thanks.-- Caspian blue 21:32, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
"Ronz has accused me of restoring 'spam links'" Let's look at the facts:
I don't see any such accusations. I see a misunderstanding by Caspian blue, his advise-giving in response, his accusations of disruption, and more advise-giving. All in edit summaries. -- Ronz ( talk) 21:51, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Hmm..Sorry, Nihonjoe for being dragged into the dispute. I just needed your objective evaluation on the two sites. However, I might have brought to AN3 board, since Ronz clearly violated 3RR instead of the generosity.
What's more, I explicitly pointed out the misunderstanding and apologized for any confustion caused by my edits.
[7]. This apology wasn't taken well
[8]. --
Ronz (
talk)
22:11, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Yep. I would have refactored if given a chance.
Meanwhile, by taking sides in this dispute it has encouraged more statements like those already used to attack meyou appear to be encouraging statements such as: (refactored 7/10)
-- Ronz ( talk) 21:34, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
You're right, I should've not brought the matter on your talk page, but gone to RS board instead and discussed with him calmly. I am sorry for causing the trouble on your page, and I apologize for that. I felt cornered and just needed a 3rd opinion on the sites. Admin GTBacchus who knows both of us seemed inactive at that time and you were there. In the meantime, the article of Insadong is now in good shape by Dekkappai and Bendono's nice expansions with many reliable sources other than the two sites. Bendono was also helping in a similar discussion with Ronz at BoA, so he seemed to see another dispute at Insadong. User:MS, the highly established content builder with 5 GAs and 1FL is challenged by Ronz for the interpretation on WP:EL and WP:SPAM that I also can not agree. Perhaps, there also requires your 3 opinion. Anyway, I really appreciate your help. Thanks again.-- Caspian blue 05:38, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Please explain yourself or apologize for your threat to block me for supposed incivilities here on your talk page that were state were "completely unacceptable".
I'm at a loss as to why you've decided to threaten me for supposed incivilities that you deem "completely unacceptable". Could you explain with quotes or diffs as required per
WP:NPA? (refactored 7/10)
I came here to discuss the problems after you gave me a warning. Instead of responding to my concerns, you threaten me? You brought yourself into the situation, and did so unilaterally. In my experience, that was a poor choice on your part. Your continued threats are actionable, but I'm here once again hoping you can discuss the situation this time.
When I came here, I said I would have refactored my comments for which you were concerned if I had been given a chance. I then pointed out the incivilities that you appeared to be overlooking. I provided diffs to point out that accusations against me were without merit. I refactored my comments so to appease the other editors.
As I pointed out, you appeared to encourage attacks against me. I was concerned that your taking sides would encourage more attacks on me. As expected, the attacks continued. (refactored 7/10) I think I handled it well and without "completely unacceptable" incivility as you accuse me. --
Ronz (
talk)
15:28, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
OK-- I'll just butt in once to say: The "personal attacks" above (most of them) were mine. They were of my own volition, and neither NihonJoe nor nor Caspian "encouraged" me. They were my own bluntly-spoken responses to your own actions, and, as I stated on my talk page, the tone was inappropriate, but I still feel the meaning was accurate-- Indeed you seem to confirm their accuracy more and more. During one of our interactions I made reference to Santayana's definition of
fanaticism. I'd really like you to think about this: "redoubling your effort when you have forgotten your aim". Our aim here at Wikipedia is to build an encyclopedia-- a populist encyclopedia of "the sum of human knowledge." This should be the aim of every editor here. We are not here to fight vandals, write a manual of style, build a bureaucracy, fight "spam", delete other people's work, etc. All these things may be necessary at some point, but they should never take the place of, much less interfere with our aim here-- to build an encyclopedia. When you take spam-fighting to the level of removing perfectly good sources, just because you (or some "consensus" of like-minded editors) feel they are used at too many articles, you have forgotten Wikipedia's aim and redoubled your effort. When I've asked you to try to take a constructive hand in some article here, you've taken offense and accused me of "Battling" or "Personal Attacking" or not "Assume Good Faithing"-- or one of those other handy self-made rules so beloved of wiki-cops. Again, I ask this sincerely, just try this: Find a subject area in which you have some interest and try to build up content in that area. Try avoiding Wiki-cop-like activities for a while and work on an article or two. See if your outlook on Wikipedia and your fellow editors doesn't change, and for the better. I've said it before: Researching, writing and building articles here is fun, challenging, and educational. And not only does it make contributing here a pleasure, it should be the aim of every editor here.
Dekkappai (
talk)
17:37, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm trying to write up a new article, but I'm not quite sure what one of the references I want to use says. Could you take a look at the third reference here? I know he's talking about the lyrics of the song, but I'm not sure on the specifics.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙) 03:53, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Quick request. May I have you move Late Old Japanese to Early Middle Japanese? After discussing the issue with an established expert as well as reviewing several other more modern resources, I am slightly updating the nomenclature to match. I'll take care the redirects and updating links. Thanks. Bendono ( talk) 10:07, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
I have unblocked ICSC ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) so that he can change his name. I have counseled him regarding Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations. Fred Talk 01:19, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
hi Nihonjoe,
Anyway no need to apologies, Thank you so much for releasing my block. My name is Rasik Dave and I am working in one of the leading Company. I used to spare time for contributing in our Wikipedia. I request you to represent my candidature for Administrator role. I will definitely add value with additional responsibilities.
Regards....Rasik —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bamnera ( talk • contribs)
Hello Nihonjoe, it appears you have alot of experience with Japan-related articles, so I've come to ask for your opinion about an incident. Referring to these edits on Japanese architecture made by User:Cherry Blossom OK, he claims that Japanese architecture comes from "The Three Kingdoms of Korea", while adding a few printed sources. Since he has only added the titles and names of the "books" (some are in Korean) and not publishing detail (such as ISBN numbers, etc), it would be very difficult to verify if these books actually exist. Also, he has been screwing up the WikiSyntax, and completely ruining the grammar of sentences by copypasting in the strangest of places. What do you think should be done? -- 李博杰 | — Talk contribs email 12:34, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 09:37, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
I need some advice on the articles about present members of the House of Kujō. There is a whole group of these articles, but I can't find any evidence for any of those people (in, admittedly, searches with the Western alphabet, not with the Japanese). Furthermore (and this rang my alarm bells) the source used in e.g. Kyousuke Fujiwara or Sadako Kuroi is a book published before the subjects were even born. The majority of the articles list these persons as if they are royalty (e.g. Fujiwara Manami). It seems strange that I can not find any evidence for any of these people in reliable sources. Can you confirm that a) these are not hoaxes, and b) these people are notable? Thanks! Fram ( talk) 19:04, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
All twenty-one articles plus one template are now at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fujiwara Manami. Fram ( talk) 13:14, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
I thank for your advice. [41] I wrote my opinion about Baekje in TalkPage. when you have spare time, Please write your opinion. -- 青鬼よし ( talk) 14:49, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi Nihonjoe, this user has made an unblock request. In the context of agreeing to a username change, I think an unblock could be possible. What are your thoughts? PhilKnight ( talk) 17:40, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your concern. I appreciate your effort, even if you are Japanese, I think you try to keep neutral stance in my opinion, so i appreciate it. However, your recent 3rr warning is truly inappropriate. [42]
and please try keep an neutral stance, shall you? I think you need more attention to 青鬼よし's POV pushing. and i want discuss with him. and i can discuss it, and i can point out why his POV pushed edit is wrong. till now, 青鬼よし did not satatement why his edit is right at discussion page. Cherry Blossom OK ( talk) 18:57, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi NihonJoe, The article Sairuki Mourino, which you deleted on July 5 (thanks - I had proposed deletion), has been created again, with all-new contents, apparently nonsense. Fg2 ( talk) 21:38, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello Nihonjoe! Recently a Supply Chain Compliance Article was deleted. I'd like to request to get that article back.
Thanks! Jmiles1107 ( talk) 19:40, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
I would suggest you taking a look at the Management Dynamics page. That article references their products and services and has not been flagged for advertising. The Integration Point article is not bias nor an advertisement since there is no mention of any products or services. The article simply talks about managing global trade and how that can be done with any system from any company. I am not an employee, but simply an interested party. The people referenced in the article are reputable amongst US Customs and Border Protection and other US government agencies and are often used as resources when there are questions of global regulatory changes. The materials written by those referenced in the Integration Point article have been published by several publications, which makes them "secondary sources" - what Wiki requires for an article to meet credibility. Wikipedia is a tool where people learn and educate themselves. International Trade is growing and it is important that there are company pages on Wikipedia to support the growth and educate those people who are importing and exporting around the world. Jmiles1107 ( talk) 13:08, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
If you're going to remove templates on pages because they allegedly don't belong there, please replace them with one that should be there. Thanks. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 20:56, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Apologies for the nudge, but I've had a note from Enigmaman about this, which is still outstanding. As you're the reviewing admin, if you have the time are you able to take a final look and close things up? There have been no further responses from the editor. Thanks! EyeSerene talk 08:22, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello Nihonjoe. Cherry Blossom OK destroyed my page. [44] And, he suddenly participated in the article Kofun period in which I participated, and rewound the article the day before when I participated. (He rewound the article until March 15, 2009. [45]) As a result, information accumulated for Five months is being thrown away by Cherry Blossom OK. (The explanation of "Aristocratic system of ancient Japan" and "Famous aristocrats" was thrown away by him.) [46]. Please return the article to the state of "302226007" [47] (14:13, 15 July 2009 ), and protect it. -- 青鬼よし ( talk) 11:37, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi, you say yet they refuse to accept that their username is misleading. I had actually said, in the text that you were responding to I'm pretty sure (after my recent experience) that consensus will be that blocking usernames that are IP addresses is correct. - that's pretty clear that I accept that consensus is against me. I'll try to be clear about what I want - admins block usernames (have done for ages, will continue to do so) that resemble IP addresses. I do not want to change that. I do want to change the text on the policy page, so that it says that admins will block usernames that resemble IP addresses. I hope this helps. Hurr87.113.86.207durr ( talk) 11:44, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
I know you believe you were doing the right thing by blocking User:87.113.86.207 (talk) because his username looked like his IP, but a polite request that he change his username would have done the same thing without biting a newbie. There is a discussion going on at WT:UAA about this. rspεεr ( talk) 16:10, 17 July 2009 (UTC)