Hello! -- Myosci ( talk) 21:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Here's the version of my German user talk page from July 24th, 2022.
"The effect of smoking on exhaled carbon monoxide and arterial elasticity during prolonged surgical mask use in the COVID-19 era". Retrieved 9 July 2022. PWV change Myosci ( talk) 20:14, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Myosci. Regarding comments like [1] and [2], please remember that talk pages are for discussing improvements to articles; they are not forums to discuss the article's topic or tangential matters. Also, please note:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
-- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 00:32, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 9-Euro-Ticket, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FDP. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:21, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Is it possiblie to create a true step function plot with the Template:Graph:Chart? It is possible to mimic it by a line plot with steep increases, but that graph has (almost) vertical lines that look "non-mathematican".
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
This workaround would be too complicated for large data sets:
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
-- Myosci ( talk) 08:00, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
see Talk:Myocarditis#Explanation_for_revert_of_well-sourced_information_needed -- Myosci ( talk) 12:28, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Myocarditis, you may be blocked from editing. You are violating talk page rules to argue your point of view. See WP:TALKNO and WP:NOTFORUM.
Make a proposal for a constructive change, and support it with a WP:MEDRS review. Zefr ( talk) 22:33, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
@ Zefr: Please refrain from false accusations: My edits (see below) aren't disruptive. -- Myosci ( talk) 22:37, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Background: On two occasions this wiki-article had two copies of the study doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.059970 and on two times only one copy was deleted. The explanation was that it was "redundant" (what is obvouisly true since it was a doublette). Then I pointed out that the source contained extra information regarding the 2nd vaccination with mRNA-1273 for men under 40(*) that qualified other information(**). Today the same editor scrapped it with the explanation "primary source".
I think that "primary sources" are so abundant and meta-analyses are so rare that it is impossible to have an article that rests only on meta-analyses. So some "primary sources" are retained and others aren't. Therefore "primary source" cannot be the sole explanation for a deletion.-- Myosci ( talk) 20:16, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
A meta-analysis can be marred with many errors, see wiki-article: Meta-analysis#Challenges
But here in Wikiepedia the meta-analysis with the blind spot by design and the intransparent data acquisation is retained and the "single study" from England was deleted. On the flawed notion that a "meta-analysis" is per se better than a "single study".-- Myosci ( talk) 22:29, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
...and who don't mind spending one hundred dollars (or pounds or euros) and four blood drawings. Test your troponin level before and after an arduous sports activity. And then the same before and after a vaccination. Then you could assess whether you reacted too sensitive to that vaccine.-- Myosci ( talk) 05:48, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Myosci. Thank you for creating 365-Euro-Ticket. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:56, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Please stop adding small text formatting to talk page comments. Making the page more difficult to read doesn't help anyone. MrOllie ( talk) 20:58, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, as you did at Talk:COVID-19 vaccine, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Acroterion (talk) 15:19, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
According to studies, the combination of two different COVID-19 vaccines, also called cross vaccination or mix-and-match method, provides protection equivalent to that of mRNA vaccines – including protection against the Delta variant. Individuals who receive the combination of two different vaccines produce strong immune responses, with the immediate side effects no worse than those caused by standard regimens. [1]
References
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Grant Wahl, you may be blocked from editing. Please engage with article talkpage discussion if you wish to make changes. Kingsif ( talk) 11:49, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
I don't get your editing on two talk pages for me doing nothing wrong. That is not how one treat each other. -- Myosci ( talk) 21:12, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
This is the content of your post on the article talk page [11], since the issue is addressed here I cite it here and it only belongs to here or on your talk page if you want. -- Myosci ( talk) 21:26, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
[Myosci] DO NOT continue to re-add indisputably factually incorrect information based on your interpretation of sources (date of death) or sources that were written early and inaccurately (no ibuprofen). There is no need to say "another source says X", when we know X isn't true: omitting it does not break WP:V. Indeed, omitting it makes the article better by not being needlessly confusing. As there have been clearly-explained edit reasons for removing your previous additions, and the discussions on the talk page here about some of the items, take this as your third disruptive editing warning; you have had the issue directly explained to you before, and the opportunity to come to discussion and see there was already a topic but didn't.
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! -- Myosci ( talk) 21:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Here's the version of my German user talk page from July 24th, 2022.
"The effect of smoking on exhaled carbon monoxide and arterial elasticity during prolonged surgical mask use in the COVID-19 era". Retrieved 9 July 2022. PWV change Myosci ( talk) 20:14, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Myosci. Regarding comments like [1] and [2], please remember that talk pages are for discussing improvements to articles; they are not forums to discuss the article's topic or tangential matters. Also, please note:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
-- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 00:32, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 9-Euro-Ticket, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FDP. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:21, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Is it possiblie to create a true step function plot with the Template:Graph:Chart? It is possible to mimic it by a line plot with steep increases, but that graph has (almost) vertical lines that look "non-mathematican".
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
This workaround would be too complicated for large data sets:
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
-- Myosci ( talk) 08:00, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
see Talk:Myocarditis#Explanation_for_revert_of_well-sourced_information_needed -- Myosci ( talk) 12:28, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Myocarditis, you may be blocked from editing. You are violating talk page rules to argue your point of view. See WP:TALKNO and WP:NOTFORUM.
Make a proposal for a constructive change, and support it with a WP:MEDRS review. Zefr ( talk) 22:33, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
@ Zefr: Please refrain from false accusations: My edits (see below) aren't disruptive. -- Myosci ( talk) 22:37, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Background: On two occasions this wiki-article had two copies of the study doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.059970 and on two times only one copy was deleted. The explanation was that it was "redundant" (what is obvouisly true since it was a doublette). Then I pointed out that the source contained extra information regarding the 2nd vaccination with mRNA-1273 for men under 40(*) that qualified other information(**). Today the same editor scrapped it with the explanation "primary source".
I think that "primary sources" are so abundant and meta-analyses are so rare that it is impossible to have an article that rests only on meta-analyses. So some "primary sources" are retained and others aren't. Therefore "primary source" cannot be the sole explanation for a deletion.-- Myosci ( talk) 20:16, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
A meta-analysis can be marred with many errors, see wiki-article: Meta-analysis#Challenges
But here in Wikiepedia the meta-analysis with the blind spot by design and the intransparent data acquisation is retained and the "single study" from England was deleted. On the flawed notion that a "meta-analysis" is per se better than a "single study".-- Myosci ( talk) 22:29, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
...and who don't mind spending one hundred dollars (or pounds or euros) and four blood drawings. Test your troponin level before and after an arduous sports activity. And then the same before and after a vaccination. Then you could assess whether you reacted too sensitive to that vaccine.-- Myosci ( talk) 05:48, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Myosci. Thank you for creating 365-Euro-Ticket. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:56, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Please stop adding small text formatting to talk page comments. Making the page more difficult to read doesn't help anyone. MrOllie ( talk) 20:58, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, as you did at Talk:COVID-19 vaccine, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Acroterion (talk) 15:19, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
According to studies, the combination of two different COVID-19 vaccines, also called cross vaccination or mix-and-match method, provides protection equivalent to that of mRNA vaccines – including protection against the Delta variant. Individuals who receive the combination of two different vaccines produce strong immune responses, with the immediate side effects no worse than those caused by standard regimens. [1]
References
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Grant Wahl, you may be blocked from editing. Please engage with article talkpage discussion if you wish to make changes. Kingsif ( talk) 11:49, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
I don't get your editing on two talk pages for me doing nothing wrong. That is not how one treat each other. -- Myosci ( talk) 21:12, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
This is the content of your post on the article talk page [11], since the issue is addressed here I cite it here and it only belongs to here or on your talk page if you want. -- Myosci ( talk) 21:26, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
[Myosci] DO NOT continue to re-add indisputably factually incorrect information based on your interpretation of sources (date of death) or sources that were written early and inaccurately (no ibuprofen). There is no need to say "another source says X", when we know X isn't true: omitting it does not break WP:V. Indeed, omitting it makes the article better by not being needlessly confusing. As there have been clearly-explained edit reasons for removing your previous additions, and the discussions on the talk page here about some of the items, take this as your third disruptive editing warning; you have had the issue directly explained to you before, and the opportunity to come to discussion and see there was already a topic but didn't.
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)