You gave User:Xiekaibei a warning about the speedy deletion of Www.handbags.style.com, then shortly afterward you tagged User talk:Xiekaibei for speedy deletion because it contained promotional/advertising content as well. However, if the page had been speedy deleted, the user might never have seen your original warning. If someone has promotional/advertising content on their user talk page, but there are postings from other users (such as yourself) on the page, I believe it's better to just remove the promotional/advertising material rather than deleting the user talk page. -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:19, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
User:9035chimi just vandalized Siddharth Velamoor again. Cadwallader ( talk) 00:32, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
I am Yamila Abraham the publisher/owner of Yaoi Press LLC. Anime St G canceled my appearance at their small convention last month. Due to the rude manner in which they did this all other guests of the show canceled in protest of their treatment to me. They are harassing me and the another guest in retaliation. This wiki was created by Anime St G to further defame me. I have been a guest at 150 conventions and have at times had to cancel my appearances or had my appearances canceled by the shows. This stub summarizes so little about my 10 year career. There is no reason for Anime St G to be mentioned. They are harassing me with this wiki, and promoting their show at my expense. I will continue to fight having my wikipedia biography used in this malicious way by Anime St G. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yaoipress ( talk • contribs) 16:57, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
I find that it is unecessary to delete the Palos Verdes Cross Country page. I am a member of the team, and have watched it grow to great standards. People should know about our team. And it is not all opinion based. It is true facts. I would like to know EXCACTLY what in the article makes it a nomination for ban. I thought wikipedia was to share information. This is a true event and I am trying to share it. Jratman ( talk) 14:20, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Re:
"Onedotzero [1] [not in citation given] " - See the pasted lowercase text underlined below
"onedotzero’s 10th anniversary continues, and following previous events at the tate modern and victoria and albert museum, the celebrations move to the hayward gallery, southbank for an evening of shifting identities and digital rituals as part of the undercover surrealism exhibition.
if you haven't already booked your tickets for onedotzero_counter:vision, book fast!
featuring short films, illustration and animation from spencer bewley [lazy eye], peepshow, new, black convoy and pandemonium, lighting show by willie williams [the lighting genius behind u2 + rem's world tours] and live av performances including the onedotzero commissioned av show, ‘the paradiso effect’ by saam [clor, the rapture], and a mix of cabaret, live vocals and music from george demure [output recordings]. there are also very special dj sets from britain’s hottest fashion designer giles deacon, and nathan gregory wilkins [electric stew, bugged out] plus other special guests and happenings. compere for the evening is the legendary matthew glammore [smashing, kashpoint]. expect naked people, costumes and props, and enjoy al fresco drinks in the sculpture courtyard.
the hayward gallery, upper gallery, south bank, london, uk. box office: +44 [0] 870 169 1000
www.hayward.org.uk"
- It clearly says "NEW" and "Black Convoy" please clarify why this is [not in citation given] ?
Thanks - Oz71 ( talk) 20:37, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
New to Wiki - happy for any help... Oz71 ( talk) 17:17, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
I know you're just patrolling with Twinkle, but I think a new contributor who has just made a test page would feel more welcome without an automated template. :) A little insignificant Bloated on candy 13:40, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi MuffledThud, cheers for removing the speedy delete on SMPI, i intend to grow the article over the next few days, including relevant citations etc. Best, 86.145.55.187 ( talk) 21:01, 7 November 2009 (UTC) ((sorry, didn't realise that i wasn't logged in Darigan ( talk) 21:02, 7 November 2009 (UTC)))
Hi please read my reply to your deletion of High Speed Data Link. thx
Thanks! Deb ( talk) 12:51, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
I find it insulting that you can put that up for a deletion when you have lots of pointless topics going. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cloughy96 ( talk • contribs) 17:20, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
please delete my todd turfe article(s) as i will start them up later. greatly appreciated thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prowrestling101 ( talk • contribs) 21:28, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
I recently created an article "Sir Thomas Picton School-Year 10 Portal" and it was "speedily deleted" for not containing any real meaning, even though it did contain valuable content and other information about the topic in question. Is there any chance it can be restored, even if its just to let me ellaborate more? TGLewis ( talk) 19:07, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Some references have been added to Kuhn's Quality Foods You may wish to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuhn's Quality Foods -- Eastmain ( talk) 19:15, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with this! Much appreciated. Best wishes, Invertzoo ( talk) 23:20, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi you deleted a page a made on the subject of The Beatle a newly formed up and coming techno band. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grayrocks27 ( talk • contribs) 01:12, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the editorial support you are giving this article. I will continue to 'clean it up' using wiki standards and a broader range of references. I created this article because it was long overdue and because as a scholar in this field I felt I had sufficient knowledge to do this. I recognize there may be a conflict of interest given my own webwork and published materials, but the field is still a relatively small one. PetrineA-S ( talk) 10:14, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks again for the editorial support you have given Jamaican Art. I have made the changes suggested. I also plan to volunteer my services for the Visual Arts and Jamaican portals so that I can help to structure those areas with reference to the Caribbean. Can you take a look and if you approve remove the tags from the Jamaican Art page. Many thanks -- PetrineA-S ( talk) 06:32, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
OK, Thank you again. I will get to work on that paragraph and get back to you-- PetrineA-S ( talk) 19:37, 14 November 2009 (UTC) I would appreciate you taking another look at the Jamaican Art page and hopefully removing the tags regarding conflict of interest. I have revisited the last paragraphs and offered additional references alongside my own text. Many thanks, -- PetrineA-S ( talk) 01:32, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you again for the support you have been giving my edits. I have revisited the last paragraphs and offered additional references alongside my own text. would you cansider removing theg tags regarding conflict of interest now? .Many thanks, -- PetrineA-S ( talk) 20:19, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
The Jamaican Art page I have been working on seems stuck. Can you recommend a way forward? Thank you again -- PetrineA-S ( talk) 15:16, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you again, as advised, I have listed Jamaican Art with the above portals to ask for their support. Even so, I am keen for you to review the page again to see if the banner regarding conflict of interest can be removed. I have removed references to my own scholarship where possible; significantly rewritten those sections of the page that shared similarities with material on my site, and offered other citations the Recent Trends section. I have done all this because I understand and agree with Wikipedia's concerns for neutrality. As discussed previously, I am very keen to support the Caribbean and Jamaican portals but I want to get this page cleaned up first.-- PetrineA-S ( talk) 20:48, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for looking at this article and for recognizing the changes made. Yes, I agree about having a broader range of opinion and I am actively trying to engage other art historian colleagues to support my efforts. I appreciate you removing the 'conflict of interest' banner. Hopefully you will begin to see more changes soon. I am also going to try to get support for the art sections related to the Caribbean Portal that is still an orphan page. With regard to the issue of bling funerals, I can remove it, but it does represent a current debate in Jamaica related to popular culture and African retentions. Bling funerals are a very real phenomenon related to African traditions that have been discussed in academic journals, one of which, I have cited. I will await a consensus on this.-- PetrineA-S ( talk) 16:04, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
why, thank you! and from the nominator, no less! -- Milowent ( talk) 21:19, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:Legal blogs ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Blogs about law ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. LeSnail ( talk) 01:05, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Please may you explain the necessary changes for this article to remain on wikipedia. The article isn't promoting the business practises of the company, it merely states what the company offers and what others have said about it, much like many other articles on Wiki. The company are truly unique in their field, this isn't to say that other companies can not replicate this business model - but it would be most appreciated if you could fully explain the necessary changes so that this page can meet your requirements. Thank-you.
Retrieved from " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:FS61" Hidden categories: User talk pages with Uw-spam1 notices | User talk pages with Uw-spam2 notices —Preceding unsigned comment added by FS61 ( talk • contribs) 12:42, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
No problems, this article will be dumbed down and the sentences you have highlighted will be removed and given a less 'less promotional' description. The rest of the verbiage shall also be scrutinising revised in order to remove perceived bias.
Sorry - new user, although thankful for the advice and will make changes accordingly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FS61 ( talk • contribs) 13:03, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Cheers thank you, I have removed the biased sections - so they have gone, and will now work to gather more facts before developing the article in a more factually streamlined mannor. Appreciate you removing the tag, as well as pointing out the necessary changes. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
FS61 (
talk •
contribs)
14:00, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi MuffledThud, may you please now remove the 'warning sign' as it no longer reads bias, nor advertising. More facts are to be supplied helping the continuation of bolstering this article. Cheers, FS61 (
FS61 (
talk)
15:40, 17 November 2009 (UTC)).
Please review the references that are already included in the Vendormate article. Apart from the company press release, the rest seem to be from reliable sources. -- Eastmain ( talk) 21:24, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Directed to Rgannonc
Please read your first heading and opening two sentences, and compare to the second paragraph of this paper
Competency-based education
|
---|
What is Competency Based Education? The major premise of competency based education (CBE) is that diplomas and credentials should be awarded on the basis of demonstrated performance on competency and on results, rather than on accumulated or completed credits. In fact, CBE is often tied directly to the occupational requirements of working professionals. CBE presents adult learners with opportunities to solve the real-world problems of managers, teachers, computer programmers, nurses, engineers and others. |
Comparing Institutional Approaches to Competency-Based Distance
Education
|
---|
What is competency-based education? Its major premise is that diplomas and credentials should be awarded on the basis of demonstrated student performance – on outcomes and results – rather than on the accumulation of credits, the number of successful semesters completed (seat-time), and adherence to campus residency requirements. CBE is often tied directly to the occupational requirements of working professionals, requiring degree candidates to solve real-world problems of nurses, teachers, computer scientists, and business managers. |
Can you explain?--
SPhilbrick
T
02:40, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
After not hearing an explanation from the editor, I went ahead and reported this to Copyright issues. I wrote some comments to Moonriddengirl here SPhilbrick T 16:00, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for noticing that Ustad Rais Khan was a copyvio. An alternative to deleting the copyvio is to turn the article into a stub, thereby eliminating the copyvio, as I have just done for Ustad Rais Khan. -- Eastmain ( talk) 14:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Hey there! As you have been editing an article that User:IHaveaSpoon created, I am telling you that you became a participant in WP:NEWT. The meaning of it is to see how more experienced editors deal with newbies that create new articles. I apologise that I have spent your time. You can discuss about this in Wikipedia:Newbie treatment at CSD/Ilyushka88 where I have explained how things were going with the articles I created.
Again, sorry for the misrepresentation. If there's anything I can do to make up for your lost time, please let me know. Ilyushka88 Talk to me 11:50, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I have (reluctantly) removed your A2 speedy from this article, because it really is more than a test page, though it certainly fails WP:N and looks very like something made up one day. I wish there was a speedy for this kind of thing, but as it is I'm afraid we have to PROD, and maybe on to AfD. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 13:56, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello MuffledThud, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I contested the speedy deletion of Дизајн - a page you tagged - because: R3 does not apply to redirect in another language. Consider WP:RFD. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. Tim Song ( talk) 20:52, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Why did you recommend the page R=Dogg for speedy deletion? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigquas614 ( talk • contribs) 23:48, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
You speedied that as an attack page - had you already translated it from Russian? -- SquidSK (1MC• log) 00:01, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
I do NOT WANT to break any rules — Preceding unsigned comment added by OriginalOwnerSE ( talk • contribs)
everything i post is NOT online right —Preceding unsigned comment added by OriginalOwnerSE ( talk • contribs) 07:14, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
But will all be factual. Is anything I am say now going online as I think it should be in my sandbox just for administrators - correct
I just want the community to approve everything before it gets posted
kk —Preceding unsigned comment added by OriginalOwnerSE ( talk • contribs) 07:27, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
And I went through lots of pain to try to make it work. And even to this day - it does not work. I have some insight as to why.
I do NOT have encylopedia writing skills ... I am NOT stupid .. but I require help to explain
kk —Preceding unsigned comment added by OriginalOwnerSE ( talk • contribs) 07:32, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Please delete any comments on SexEducation.com public on Wiki I want private advice from the community before I proceede with this Link coming fast stand by —Preceding unsigned comment added by OriginalOwnerSE ( talk • contribs) 07:41, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Now its not there I will have to brush up on my surfing skills for webpages 10+ years ago
Interesting —Preceding unsigned comment added by OriginalOwnerSE ( talk • contribs) 07:47, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Why can i not sign this page with four tildes or question marks —Preceding unsigned comment added by OriginalOwnerSE ( talk • contribs) 07:49, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
I have been trying they keep coming up slashes
Same thing happened when I tried to make the original SexEducation.com website
shut down shut down
delete delete delete
lol
I thought this website was different
I will try again
but not today —Preceding unsigned comment added by OriginalOwnerSE ( talk • contribs) 08:01, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Maybe its security by Wiki
And if so - they would be correct not to post my IP
I received many NOT SO WELCOME physical threats
when i began SexEducation.com
and guess what
its still a stupid link page and not what I programmed it for for almost two years
fyi —Preceding unsigned comment added by OriginalOwnerSE ( talk • contribs) 08:07, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
It is a declaration of human sexual rights that the United Nations has failed to declare after decades of ....
well whatever ... here u go ..
help me write the history of SexEducation.com please my friend please
here u go ...
EVERY person that is reproductively capable has a self evident right to and understanding of such.
Thats what I learned in 10 years of study. —Preceding unsigned comment added by OriginalOwnerSE ( talk • contribs) 08:12, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Can u help me make a decent page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by OriginalOwnerSE ( talk • contribs) 08:25, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
roflmao ---
Brother - help me write a factual history of SexEducation.com
thats are job as Wiki's "is in not" —Preceding unsigned comment added by OriginalOwnerSE ( talk • contribs) 08:30, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
OriginalOwnerSE ( talk) 09:05, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
nice J. E. Beacock The original owner of SexEducation.com
I did NOTHING to allow using four tildes to sign this page even though i tried lots
but now it works
OriginalOwnerSE ( talk) 09:08, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your welcome to Wikipedia. I am confused however on how to edit the article I put up that has been so quickly deleted without any time to make edits. Please advise on how I can modify my content to meet the criteria. As it is now, I am being threatened by one of the Administrators, even though this is the first content I have ever attempted to place on these pages. Is there any way to contest their decisions? —Preceding unsigned comment added by StarJimV ( talk • contribs) 15:52, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your input. The problem was that the speedy deletion seemed to happen within minutes, and I was unable to respond with any edits. I have been writing web content as well as marketing materials for many years, and I honestly believe that I could write any article with a neutral point of view. As far as the project itself being of low notability, I am surprised. This was a huge venture that was covered by hundreds of news outlets all across the country. It was a massive effort to pull off the World's Largest Pizza Party, and with nothing but volunteers and support from a lot of people.
When I put a message on my talk page, the immediate response surprised me. Sometimes, emotions and attitudes can become apparent in postings!
Thanks again for your comments. I will consider having someone else write the article, and I agree, that it should be about the project more so than the person. The only thing I would say though, is that the project is only interesting because of the backstory about someone that is seemingly a "nobody" that does something that has such a huge impact. Please go to: www.OperationPizza.com to get more information about this program and how others see it.
StarJimV ( talk) 16:21, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Could I take you up on that offer to learn how to do the sandbox process? Thanks StarJimV ( talk) 16:58, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
I might be an idiot for I really don't understand why my first article, which I spent half an hour to write up, got deleted. When I wanted info on that subject, I couldn't find anything useful anywhere on the web, so that's why I decided to create an account and write up the article because I didn't know how to put up a reqeust for it. This kind of thing happens to me a lot in Yahoo answers, so no big deal. That's all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dollhouser ( talk • contribs) 19:51, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi Muffled thud. I've declined this speedy deletion nomination, as by use of "What links here" I was able to establish context for this article and categorise it. Ϣere SpielChequers 08:30, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Ϣere
SpielChequers is offering you a Wiki Beer! Liquid refreshment promotes
WikiHarmony and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the harmony by offering a beer to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Best served refrigerated (not applicable in England). Temperature and Alcoholic strength varies according to age, religion and geographic location of recipient, US residents below the age of 21 are best advised to keep this beerstar until travelling in a country with less ageist drinking laws. NB This Beerstar is compatible with all known fake IDs
Thanks, and good point about the other articles, I think I'll turn one into a dab page. BTW I'm beginning to come to the view that No-context should be treated as prods rather than speedies. What do you think of that and would you mind if I quoted this as an example if I formally proposed that? Ϣere SpielChequers 10:40, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi MuffledThud. I removed your CSD tag from The Threeep - Part I - Starting since the existence of an article on the band, Matt Pond PA, seems to make A9 non-applicable. Let me know if I've missed something. Cheers, Olaf Davis ( talk) 22:44, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
I submitted a permission email from the owner of the copywright info that was part of the deleted submission. How can I find out the status? Tdantonio ( talk) 09:21, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Kissaki Kai Karate has had messages on it for several days even after all corrections/deletions were made. I will be editing the page and adding the reference sources shortly but is there some reason why it still shows those messages? This is definitely a process! Tdantonio ( talk) 11:32, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Hey what's the big idea? I was up at 10pm last night writting that page, and i also had a major science test coming up. Ur user name should be 'munted thug' what'd you do that for? im warning you mate, dont come crawling around my pages! or theres going to be trouble... Tiffany Rafter ( talk) 11:41, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Well excuse me you're not the only person here with feelings you know. So Sorry for hurting you, but come on, really. Get a Life!!! Dont be a munted thug. Tiffany Rafter ( talk) 11:50, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi. The definition of WP:CSD#G1 is actually very tightly drawn: "Pages consisting entirely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history." - it is intended only for a*Sx^55D&#!h and the like. Things that are not incoherent or gibberish but are "nonsense" as generally understood can often be tagged as WP:CSD#G3 "blatant misinformation", like Codlapper just now; but Exocious doesn't really qualify for any speedy, though it clearly needs to go per WP:NEO and WP:NFT, so I have converted it to a PROD. I wish we had a speedy for "blatantly made up one day," and I have suggested it more than once, but it never gets much support. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 14:09, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello Muffled, hope you are doing great! can you do me a little favor and look into Pio Colonnello, I think it matches CSD unremarkable person, but I want to be sure before I tag it. Taqi Haider ( talk) 16:29, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
GilHecht ( talk) 16:38, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi there, i've edited the article 'Spin Out Records'... could you take a look at it and tell me if you think it's suitable. We've avoided advertising, simply listed the facts about our releases and where we got the information from.
Spin Out Records Spinoutrecords ( talk) 11:53, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Re: Michael Burks. The information posted at Reverb Nation is from his official biography written and provided courtesy of Alligator Records. We are not infringing on any content —Preceding unsigned comment added by JoshGator ( talk • contribs) 17:09, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
I just sent an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with the details that we hold the copyrights for all text included in this article, which was originally posted at Alligator Records' website at www.alligator.com and was subsequently reposted at http://www.reverbnation.com/michaelburks —Preceding unsigned comment added by JoshGator ( talk • contribs) 17:17, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
All of the information contained within the article has been released publicly. There is no opinion content included and the quotes I have included are cited properly.
We were very careful when composing the article to ensure that it was entirely factual.—Preceding unsigned comment added by JoshGator ( talk • contribs) 17:19, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
-- JoshGator ( talk) 17:27, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
I'm still confused as to why this cannot be donated. We stripped out any subjective adjectives and opinions. We were careful to only include factual historical information and properly cited quotations
It seems that not having an article on Michael Burks does not serve the Wikipedia community. We want to ensure that if press or the general public are searching for information on Michael Burks that they only get the facts.
Could you indicate what content is seen as objectionable or subjective? We will do whatever is required to conform to Wikipedia standards.
-- JoshGator ( talk) 17:41, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
You gave me a speedy deletion mark because of copyright violation. Gray Line Austria gives full copyright to the contributed text about Gray Line Austria —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sspind ( talk • contribs) 15:16, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
I removed the csd tag you placed as I found a few sources for this person. Please take a look and nom for AFD or Prod if you still feel it should be deleted. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 15:25, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Conflict with article Minimum principle (Mathematics) was resolved. Henry Delforn ( talk) 09:02, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
My mistake on opening that AfD, I didn't look closely enough at possible speedies. You've taught me something today, thanks. RaseaC ( talk) 17:14, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for patrolling new pages and marking the bad ones for speedy deletion! fetch comms ☛ 21:18, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
You gave User:Xiekaibei a warning about the speedy deletion of Www.handbags.style.com, then shortly afterward you tagged User talk:Xiekaibei for speedy deletion because it contained promotional/advertising content as well. However, if the page had been speedy deleted, the user might never have seen your original warning. If someone has promotional/advertising content on their user talk page, but there are postings from other users (such as yourself) on the page, I believe it's better to just remove the promotional/advertising material rather than deleting the user talk page. -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:19, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
User:9035chimi just vandalized Siddharth Velamoor again. Cadwallader ( talk) 00:32, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
I am Yamila Abraham the publisher/owner of Yaoi Press LLC. Anime St G canceled my appearance at their small convention last month. Due to the rude manner in which they did this all other guests of the show canceled in protest of their treatment to me. They are harassing me and the another guest in retaliation. This wiki was created by Anime St G to further defame me. I have been a guest at 150 conventions and have at times had to cancel my appearances or had my appearances canceled by the shows. This stub summarizes so little about my 10 year career. There is no reason for Anime St G to be mentioned. They are harassing me with this wiki, and promoting their show at my expense. I will continue to fight having my wikipedia biography used in this malicious way by Anime St G. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yaoipress ( talk • contribs) 16:57, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
I find that it is unecessary to delete the Palos Verdes Cross Country page. I am a member of the team, and have watched it grow to great standards. People should know about our team. And it is not all opinion based. It is true facts. I would like to know EXCACTLY what in the article makes it a nomination for ban. I thought wikipedia was to share information. This is a true event and I am trying to share it. Jratman ( talk) 14:20, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Re:
"Onedotzero [1] [not in citation given] " - See the pasted lowercase text underlined below
"onedotzero’s 10th anniversary continues, and following previous events at the tate modern and victoria and albert museum, the celebrations move to the hayward gallery, southbank for an evening of shifting identities and digital rituals as part of the undercover surrealism exhibition.
if you haven't already booked your tickets for onedotzero_counter:vision, book fast!
featuring short films, illustration and animation from spencer bewley [lazy eye], peepshow, new, black convoy and pandemonium, lighting show by willie williams [the lighting genius behind u2 + rem's world tours] and live av performances including the onedotzero commissioned av show, ‘the paradiso effect’ by saam [clor, the rapture], and a mix of cabaret, live vocals and music from george demure [output recordings]. there are also very special dj sets from britain’s hottest fashion designer giles deacon, and nathan gregory wilkins [electric stew, bugged out] plus other special guests and happenings. compere for the evening is the legendary matthew glammore [smashing, kashpoint]. expect naked people, costumes and props, and enjoy al fresco drinks in the sculpture courtyard.
the hayward gallery, upper gallery, south bank, london, uk. box office: +44 [0] 870 169 1000
www.hayward.org.uk"
- It clearly says "NEW" and "Black Convoy" please clarify why this is [not in citation given] ?
Thanks - Oz71 ( talk) 20:37, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
New to Wiki - happy for any help... Oz71 ( talk) 17:17, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
I know you're just patrolling with Twinkle, but I think a new contributor who has just made a test page would feel more welcome without an automated template. :) A little insignificant Bloated on candy 13:40, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi MuffledThud, cheers for removing the speedy delete on SMPI, i intend to grow the article over the next few days, including relevant citations etc. Best, 86.145.55.187 ( talk) 21:01, 7 November 2009 (UTC) ((sorry, didn't realise that i wasn't logged in Darigan ( talk) 21:02, 7 November 2009 (UTC)))
Hi please read my reply to your deletion of High Speed Data Link. thx
Thanks! Deb ( talk) 12:51, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
I find it insulting that you can put that up for a deletion when you have lots of pointless topics going. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cloughy96 ( talk • contribs) 17:20, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
please delete my todd turfe article(s) as i will start them up later. greatly appreciated thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prowrestling101 ( talk • contribs) 21:28, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
I recently created an article "Sir Thomas Picton School-Year 10 Portal" and it was "speedily deleted" for not containing any real meaning, even though it did contain valuable content and other information about the topic in question. Is there any chance it can be restored, even if its just to let me ellaborate more? TGLewis ( talk) 19:07, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Some references have been added to Kuhn's Quality Foods You may wish to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuhn's Quality Foods -- Eastmain ( talk) 19:15, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with this! Much appreciated. Best wishes, Invertzoo ( talk) 23:20, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi you deleted a page a made on the subject of The Beatle a newly formed up and coming techno band. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grayrocks27 ( talk • contribs) 01:12, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the editorial support you are giving this article. I will continue to 'clean it up' using wiki standards and a broader range of references. I created this article because it was long overdue and because as a scholar in this field I felt I had sufficient knowledge to do this. I recognize there may be a conflict of interest given my own webwork and published materials, but the field is still a relatively small one. PetrineA-S ( talk) 10:14, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks again for the editorial support you have given Jamaican Art. I have made the changes suggested. I also plan to volunteer my services for the Visual Arts and Jamaican portals so that I can help to structure those areas with reference to the Caribbean. Can you take a look and if you approve remove the tags from the Jamaican Art page. Many thanks -- PetrineA-S ( talk) 06:32, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
OK, Thank you again. I will get to work on that paragraph and get back to you-- PetrineA-S ( talk) 19:37, 14 November 2009 (UTC) I would appreciate you taking another look at the Jamaican Art page and hopefully removing the tags regarding conflict of interest. I have revisited the last paragraphs and offered additional references alongside my own text. Many thanks, -- PetrineA-S ( talk) 01:32, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you again for the support you have been giving my edits. I have revisited the last paragraphs and offered additional references alongside my own text. would you cansider removing theg tags regarding conflict of interest now? .Many thanks, -- PetrineA-S ( talk) 20:19, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
The Jamaican Art page I have been working on seems stuck. Can you recommend a way forward? Thank you again -- PetrineA-S ( talk) 15:16, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you again, as advised, I have listed Jamaican Art with the above portals to ask for their support. Even so, I am keen for you to review the page again to see if the banner regarding conflict of interest can be removed. I have removed references to my own scholarship where possible; significantly rewritten those sections of the page that shared similarities with material on my site, and offered other citations the Recent Trends section. I have done all this because I understand and agree with Wikipedia's concerns for neutrality. As discussed previously, I am very keen to support the Caribbean and Jamaican portals but I want to get this page cleaned up first.-- PetrineA-S ( talk) 20:48, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for looking at this article and for recognizing the changes made. Yes, I agree about having a broader range of opinion and I am actively trying to engage other art historian colleagues to support my efforts. I appreciate you removing the 'conflict of interest' banner. Hopefully you will begin to see more changes soon. I am also going to try to get support for the art sections related to the Caribbean Portal that is still an orphan page. With regard to the issue of bling funerals, I can remove it, but it does represent a current debate in Jamaica related to popular culture and African retentions. Bling funerals are a very real phenomenon related to African traditions that have been discussed in academic journals, one of which, I have cited. I will await a consensus on this.-- PetrineA-S ( talk) 16:04, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
why, thank you! and from the nominator, no less! -- Milowent ( talk) 21:19, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:Legal blogs ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Blogs about law ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. LeSnail ( talk) 01:05, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Please may you explain the necessary changes for this article to remain on wikipedia. The article isn't promoting the business practises of the company, it merely states what the company offers and what others have said about it, much like many other articles on Wiki. The company are truly unique in their field, this isn't to say that other companies can not replicate this business model - but it would be most appreciated if you could fully explain the necessary changes so that this page can meet your requirements. Thank-you.
Retrieved from " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:FS61" Hidden categories: User talk pages with Uw-spam1 notices | User talk pages with Uw-spam2 notices —Preceding unsigned comment added by FS61 ( talk • contribs) 12:42, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
No problems, this article will be dumbed down and the sentences you have highlighted will be removed and given a less 'less promotional' description. The rest of the verbiage shall also be scrutinising revised in order to remove perceived bias.
Sorry - new user, although thankful for the advice and will make changes accordingly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FS61 ( talk • contribs) 13:03, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Cheers thank you, I have removed the biased sections - so they have gone, and will now work to gather more facts before developing the article in a more factually streamlined mannor. Appreciate you removing the tag, as well as pointing out the necessary changes. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
FS61 (
talk •
contribs)
14:00, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi MuffledThud, may you please now remove the 'warning sign' as it no longer reads bias, nor advertising. More facts are to be supplied helping the continuation of bolstering this article. Cheers, FS61 (
FS61 (
talk)
15:40, 17 November 2009 (UTC)).
Please review the references that are already included in the Vendormate article. Apart from the company press release, the rest seem to be from reliable sources. -- Eastmain ( talk) 21:24, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Directed to Rgannonc
Please read your first heading and opening two sentences, and compare to the second paragraph of this paper
Competency-based education
|
---|
What is Competency Based Education? The major premise of competency based education (CBE) is that diplomas and credentials should be awarded on the basis of demonstrated performance on competency and on results, rather than on accumulated or completed credits. In fact, CBE is often tied directly to the occupational requirements of working professionals. CBE presents adult learners with opportunities to solve the real-world problems of managers, teachers, computer programmers, nurses, engineers and others. |
Comparing Institutional Approaches to Competency-Based Distance
Education
|
---|
What is competency-based education? Its major premise is that diplomas and credentials should be awarded on the basis of demonstrated student performance – on outcomes and results – rather than on the accumulation of credits, the number of successful semesters completed (seat-time), and adherence to campus residency requirements. CBE is often tied directly to the occupational requirements of working professionals, requiring degree candidates to solve real-world problems of nurses, teachers, computer scientists, and business managers. |
Can you explain?--
SPhilbrick
T
02:40, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
After not hearing an explanation from the editor, I went ahead and reported this to Copyright issues. I wrote some comments to Moonriddengirl here SPhilbrick T 16:00, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for noticing that Ustad Rais Khan was a copyvio. An alternative to deleting the copyvio is to turn the article into a stub, thereby eliminating the copyvio, as I have just done for Ustad Rais Khan. -- Eastmain ( talk) 14:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Hey there! As you have been editing an article that User:IHaveaSpoon created, I am telling you that you became a participant in WP:NEWT. The meaning of it is to see how more experienced editors deal with newbies that create new articles. I apologise that I have spent your time. You can discuss about this in Wikipedia:Newbie treatment at CSD/Ilyushka88 where I have explained how things were going with the articles I created.
Again, sorry for the misrepresentation. If there's anything I can do to make up for your lost time, please let me know. Ilyushka88 Talk to me 11:50, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I have (reluctantly) removed your A2 speedy from this article, because it really is more than a test page, though it certainly fails WP:N and looks very like something made up one day. I wish there was a speedy for this kind of thing, but as it is I'm afraid we have to PROD, and maybe on to AfD. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 13:56, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello MuffledThud, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I contested the speedy deletion of Дизајн - a page you tagged - because: R3 does not apply to redirect in another language. Consider WP:RFD. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. Tim Song ( talk) 20:52, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Why did you recommend the page R=Dogg for speedy deletion? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigquas614 ( talk • contribs) 23:48, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
You speedied that as an attack page - had you already translated it from Russian? -- SquidSK (1MC• log) 00:01, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
I do NOT WANT to break any rules — Preceding unsigned comment added by OriginalOwnerSE ( talk • contribs)
everything i post is NOT online right —Preceding unsigned comment added by OriginalOwnerSE ( talk • contribs) 07:14, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
But will all be factual. Is anything I am say now going online as I think it should be in my sandbox just for administrators - correct
I just want the community to approve everything before it gets posted
kk —Preceding unsigned comment added by OriginalOwnerSE ( talk • contribs) 07:27, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
And I went through lots of pain to try to make it work. And even to this day - it does not work. I have some insight as to why.
I do NOT have encylopedia writing skills ... I am NOT stupid .. but I require help to explain
kk —Preceding unsigned comment added by OriginalOwnerSE ( talk • contribs) 07:32, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Please delete any comments on SexEducation.com public on Wiki I want private advice from the community before I proceede with this Link coming fast stand by —Preceding unsigned comment added by OriginalOwnerSE ( talk • contribs) 07:41, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Now its not there I will have to brush up on my surfing skills for webpages 10+ years ago
Interesting —Preceding unsigned comment added by OriginalOwnerSE ( talk • contribs) 07:47, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Why can i not sign this page with four tildes or question marks —Preceding unsigned comment added by OriginalOwnerSE ( talk • contribs) 07:49, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
I have been trying they keep coming up slashes
Same thing happened when I tried to make the original SexEducation.com website
shut down shut down
delete delete delete
lol
I thought this website was different
I will try again
but not today —Preceding unsigned comment added by OriginalOwnerSE ( talk • contribs) 08:01, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Maybe its security by Wiki
And if so - they would be correct not to post my IP
I received many NOT SO WELCOME physical threats
when i began SexEducation.com
and guess what
its still a stupid link page and not what I programmed it for for almost two years
fyi —Preceding unsigned comment added by OriginalOwnerSE ( talk • contribs) 08:07, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
It is a declaration of human sexual rights that the United Nations has failed to declare after decades of ....
well whatever ... here u go ..
help me write the history of SexEducation.com please my friend please
here u go ...
EVERY person that is reproductively capable has a self evident right to and understanding of such.
Thats what I learned in 10 years of study. —Preceding unsigned comment added by OriginalOwnerSE ( talk • contribs) 08:12, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Can u help me make a decent page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by OriginalOwnerSE ( talk • contribs) 08:25, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
roflmao ---
Brother - help me write a factual history of SexEducation.com
thats are job as Wiki's "is in not" —Preceding unsigned comment added by OriginalOwnerSE ( talk • contribs) 08:30, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
OriginalOwnerSE ( talk) 09:05, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
nice J. E. Beacock The original owner of SexEducation.com
I did NOTHING to allow using four tildes to sign this page even though i tried lots
but now it works
OriginalOwnerSE ( talk) 09:08, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your welcome to Wikipedia. I am confused however on how to edit the article I put up that has been so quickly deleted without any time to make edits. Please advise on how I can modify my content to meet the criteria. As it is now, I am being threatened by one of the Administrators, even though this is the first content I have ever attempted to place on these pages. Is there any way to contest their decisions? —Preceding unsigned comment added by StarJimV ( talk • contribs) 15:52, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your input. The problem was that the speedy deletion seemed to happen within minutes, and I was unable to respond with any edits. I have been writing web content as well as marketing materials for many years, and I honestly believe that I could write any article with a neutral point of view. As far as the project itself being of low notability, I am surprised. This was a huge venture that was covered by hundreds of news outlets all across the country. It was a massive effort to pull off the World's Largest Pizza Party, and with nothing but volunteers and support from a lot of people.
When I put a message on my talk page, the immediate response surprised me. Sometimes, emotions and attitudes can become apparent in postings!
Thanks again for your comments. I will consider having someone else write the article, and I agree, that it should be about the project more so than the person. The only thing I would say though, is that the project is only interesting because of the backstory about someone that is seemingly a "nobody" that does something that has such a huge impact. Please go to: www.OperationPizza.com to get more information about this program and how others see it.
StarJimV ( talk) 16:21, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Could I take you up on that offer to learn how to do the sandbox process? Thanks StarJimV ( talk) 16:58, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
I might be an idiot for I really don't understand why my first article, which I spent half an hour to write up, got deleted. When I wanted info on that subject, I couldn't find anything useful anywhere on the web, so that's why I decided to create an account and write up the article because I didn't know how to put up a reqeust for it. This kind of thing happens to me a lot in Yahoo answers, so no big deal. That's all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dollhouser ( talk • contribs) 19:51, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi Muffled thud. I've declined this speedy deletion nomination, as by use of "What links here" I was able to establish context for this article and categorise it. Ϣere SpielChequers 08:30, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Ϣere
SpielChequers is offering you a Wiki Beer! Liquid refreshment promotes
WikiHarmony and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the harmony by offering a beer to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Best served refrigerated (not applicable in England). Temperature and Alcoholic strength varies according to age, religion and geographic location of recipient, US residents below the age of 21 are best advised to keep this beerstar until travelling in a country with less ageist drinking laws. NB This Beerstar is compatible with all known fake IDs
Thanks, and good point about the other articles, I think I'll turn one into a dab page. BTW I'm beginning to come to the view that No-context should be treated as prods rather than speedies. What do you think of that and would you mind if I quoted this as an example if I formally proposed that? Ϣere SpielChequers 10:40, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi MuffledThud. I removed your CSD tag from The Threeep - Part I - Starting since the existence of an article on the band, Matt Pond PA, seems to make A9 non-applicable. Let me know if I've missed something. Cheers, Olaf Davis ( talk) 22:44, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
I submitted a permission email from the owner of the copywright info that was part of the deleted submission. How can I find out the status? Tdantonio ( talk) 09:21, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Kissaki Kai Karate has had messages on it for several days even after all corrections/deletions were made. I will be editing the page and adding the reference sources shortly but is there some reason why it still shows those messages? This is definitely a process! Tdantonio ( talk) 11:32, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Hey what's the big idea? I was up at 10pm last night writting that page, and i also had a major science test coming up. Ur user name should be 'munted thug' what'd you do that for? im warning you mate, dont come crawling around my pages! or theres going to be trouble... Tiffany Rafter ( talk) 11:41, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Well excuse me you're not the only person here with feelings you know. So Sorry for hurting you, but come on, really. Get a Life!!! Dont be a munted thug. Tiffany Rafter ( talk) 11:50, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi. The definition of WP:CSD#G1 is actually very tightly drawn: "Pages consisting entirely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history." - it is intended only for a*Sx^55D&#!h and the like. Things that are not incoherent or gibberish but are "nonsense" as generally understood can often be tagged as WP:CSD#G3 "blatant misinformation", like Codlapper just now; but Exocious doesn't really qualify for any speedy, though it clearly needs to go per WP:NEO and WP:NFT, so I have converted it to a PROD. I wish we had a speedy for "blatantly made up one day," and I have suggested it more than once, but it never gets much support. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 14:09, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello Muffled, hope you are doing great! can you do me a little favor and look into Pio Colonnello, I think it matches CSD unremarkable person, but I want to be sure before I tag it. Taqi Haider ( talk) 16:29, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
GilHecht ( talk) 16:38, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi there, i've edited the article 'Spin Out Records'... could you take a look at it and tell me if you think it's suitable. We've avoided advertising, simply listed the facts about our releases and where we got the information from.
Spin Out Records Spinoutrecords ( talk) 11:53, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Re: Michael Burks. The information posted at Reverb Nation is from his official biography written and provided courtesy of Alligator Records. We are not infringing on any content —Preceding unsigned comment added by JoshGator ( talk • contribs) 17:09, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
I just sent an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with the details that we hold the copyrights for all text included in this article, which was originally posted at Alligator Records' website at www.alligator.com and was subsequently reposted at http://www.reverbnation.com/michaelburks —Preceding unsigned comment added by JoshGator ( talk • contribs) 17:17, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
All of the information contained within the article has been released publicly. There is no opinion content included and the quotes I have included are cited properly.
We were very careful when composing the article to ensure that it was entirely factual.—Preceding unsigned comment added by JoshGator ( talk • contribs) 17:19, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
-- JoshGator ( talk) 17:27, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
I'm still confused as to why this cannot be donated. We stripped out any subjective adjectives and opinions. We were careful to only include factual historical information and properly cited quotations
It seems that not having an article on Michael Burks does not serve the Wikipedia community. We want to ensure that if press or the general public are searching for information on Michael Burks that they only get the facts.
Could you indicate what content is seen as objectionable or subjective? We will do whatever is required to conform to Wikipedia standards.
-- JoshGator ( talk) 17:41, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
You gave me a speedy deletion mark because of copyright violation. Gray Line Austria gives full copyright to the contributed text about Gray Line Austria —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sspind ( talk • contribs) 15:16, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
I removed the csd tag you placed as I found a few sources for this person. Please take a look and nom for AFD or Prod if you still feel it should be deleted. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 15:25, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Conflict with article Minimum principle (Mathematics) was resolved. Henry Delforn ( talk) 09:02, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
My mistake on opening that AfD, I didn't look closely enough at possible speedies. You've taught me something today, thanks. RaseaC ( talk) 17:14, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for patrolling new pages and marking the bad ones for speedy deletion! fetch comms ☛ 21:18, 29 November 2009 (UTC)