Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! -- SineBot ( talk) 15:28, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to List of countries has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Jackol ๏̯͡๏﴿ 13:42, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to List of countries constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. — Angelo De La Paz ( talk) 13:56, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to
List of countries (
Evidence), you will be
blocked from editing.
Angelo De La Paz (
talk)
14:03, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to
List of flags by country (
Evidence), you will be
blocked from editing.
Angelo De La Paz (
talk)
14:07, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of countries. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Angelo De La Paz ( talk) 14:09, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Ahmed, please stop making personal attacks, as you did here. Please remember what I said: comment only on content and not other users. Comments such as "Justin, you aren't here on Wikipedia to spread impartiality. You are here to propagate Polisario Front theses" and "Justin, you are very young (26 old years) and you are far from the region, you have no idea about the reality of the ground" are inappropriate. I don't want to see you blocked which is why I'm asking you to stop and try to be more professional. Thanks. Khoi khoi 20:43, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Moroccansahraoui — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 07:34, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
You recently compiled and listed a case at requests for checkuser. A checkuser or clerk has requested you supply one or more diffs to justify the use of the checkuser procedure in the case, in accordance with the procedures listed in the table at the top of the requests for checkuser page. For an outcome to be achieved, we require that you provide these diffs as soon as possible. This has been implemented to reduce difficulties for checkusers, and is essential for your case to be processed. A link to your recently-created case which has this information missing is here. Thanks for your co-operation. -- lucasbfr talk 13:54, 15 September 2008 (UTC), checkuser clerk.
In a related note, since your name seemed familiar to me when you filled the RFCU case, I took the liberty to review the above sockpuppetry case. I admit that after carefully reviewing the contributions of the users Koavf reported, especially the logged out user, I am a bit puzzled. I would like to remind you that using multiple identities in order to mislead the other editors is a blockable offense. I don't wish to pursue the matter further and ask a checkuser to look at the server logs for now, but if you were indeed doing just that, I urge you to cease this behavior. Trust me, you'd get caught eventually. You can find my full comments on Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Moroccansahraoui. -- lucasbfr talk 15:57, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Following the results of Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Moroccansahraoui, I've blocked editing from several other accounts indefinitely, and from this account for one week. Please limit yourself to the use of one account, or carefully review Wikipedia's sockpuppetry policy before using multiple accounts in the future. – Luna Santin ( talk) 22:57, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
I do agree with the proposal of Orange Tuesday regarding the presentation of Western Sahara in the new list of countries. I have two little remarks : the first one is related to the claming entity which is Polisario Front and not "SADR" as mentionned in UN resolutions. Then the territory controlled by "SADR" isn't precised in UN resolutions. In the buffer zone, all activities are under Minurso control. I will say it differently : as there is no international recognition on the "moroccanity" of Western Sahara, I wonder how could the international community recognizes the "polisarity" of Western Sahara or part of it? It doesn't make sense to mention the control of Morocco neither Polisario Front. It's more about an effective adminstrative power.-- Moroccansahraoui ( talk) 02:48, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! -- SineBot ( talk) 15:28, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to List of countries has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Jackol ๏̯͡๏﴿ 13:42, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to List of countries constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. — Angelo De La Paz ( talk) 13:56, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to
List of countries (
Evidence), you will be
blocked from editing.
Angelo De La Paz (
talk)
14:03, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to
List of flags by country (
Evidence), you will be
blocked from editing.
Angelo De La Paz (
talk)
14:07, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of countries. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Angelo De La Paz ( talk) 14:09, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Ahmed, please stop making personal attacks, as you did here. Please remember what I said: comment only on content and not other users. Comments such as "Justin, you aren't here on Wikipedia to spread impartiality. You are here to propagate Polisario Front theses" and "Justin, you are very young (26 old years) and you are far from the region, you have no idea about the reality of the ground" are inappropriate. I don't want to see you blocked which is why I'm asking you to stop and try to be more professional. Thanks. Khoi khoi 20:43, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Moroccansahraoui — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 07:34, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
You recently compiled and listed a case at requests for checkuser. A checkuser or clerk has requested you supply one or more diffs to justify the use of the checkuser procedure in the case, in accordance with the procedures listed in the table at the top of the requests for checkuser page. For an outcome to be achieved, we require that you provide these diffs as soon as possible. This has been implemented to reduce difficulties for checkusers, and is essential for your case to be processed. A link to your recently-created case which has this information missing is here. Thanks for your co-operation. -- lucasbfr talk 13:54, 15 September 2008 (UTC), checkuser clerk.
In a related note, since your name seemed familiar to me when you filled the RFCU case, I took the liberty to review the above sockpuppetry case. I admit that after carefully reviewing the contributions of the users Koavf reported, especially the logged out user, I am a bit puzzled. I would like to remind you that using multiple identities in order to mislead the other editors is a blockable offense. I don't wish to pursue the matter further and ask a checkuser to look at the server logs for now, but if you were indeed doing just that, I urge you to cease this behavior. Trust me, you'd get caught eventually. You can find my full comments on Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Moroccansahraoui. -- lucasbfr talk 15:57, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Following the results of Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Moroccansahraoui, I've blocked editing from several other accounts indefinitely, and from this account for one week. Please limit yourself to the use of one account, or carefully review Wikipedia's sockpuppetry policy before using multiple accounts in the future. – Luna Santin ( talk) 22:57, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
I do agree with the proposal of Orange Tuesday regarding the presentation of Western Sahara in the new list of countries. I have two little remarks : the first one is related to the claming entity which is Polisario Front and not "SADR" as mentionned in UN resolutions. Then the territory controlled by "SADR" isn't precised in UN resolutions. In the buffer zone, all activities are under Minurso control. I will say it differently : as there is no international recognition on the "moroccanity" of Western Sahara, I wonder how could the international community recognizes the "polisarity" of Western Sahara or part of it? It doesn't make sense to mention the control of Morocco neither Polisario Front. It's more about an effective adminstrative power.-- Moroccansahraoui ( talk) 02:48, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.