![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 45 | ← | Archive 50 | Archive 51 | Archive 52 |
Happy
New Year!
Send New Year cheer by adding {{
subst:Happy New Year snowman}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.
![]() |
Women in Red Women in Asia contest |
Missvain Thank you for your December 2020 additions! WomenArtistUpdates ( talk) 01:57, 1 January 2021 (UTC) |
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Dr. Paras. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Barmitzg ( talk) 12:44, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
Thank you for your hard work and efforts with AFD-closing and relisting,
Without your help here (and on Commons) both projects would be worse off without your help so wanted to say thank you for what you do. Unfortunately AFD is one of those areas where you're damned if you do and you're damned if you don't! so ignore the comments and keep doing what you're doing which is helping the project and like other areas doing a thankless mundane task so thank you for all that you do here!. Take care and I hope you and yours have a happy, healthy and safe 2021, Warm Regards, – Davey2010 Talk 17:51, 1 January 2021 (UTC) |
I just wanted to share, I've recently spent a lot of time working on articles about Portland restaurants, even promoting 20+ to Good article status in the last couple months. I'm not much of a "foodie" but your work on restaurant articles inspired me to document Portland's dining scene, especially given the pandemic's impact on the food and restaurant industries. Anyway, just wanted to say thanks for the inspiration. I'd love to see many more Wikipedia articles about notable restaurants for various cities. Stay healthy, and Happy New Year and happy editing, --- Another Believer ( Talk) 15:56, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
I want to express my gratitude for your diligent work with AfD. As a deletionist at heart, I know how difficult AfD can be. Please don't feel downhearted or deflated. Wikipedia sometimes tends to focus on those who do the most work, as you are doing, and not those areas which need work.
Be good, and strong, and happy. You're doing a great job. doktorb words deeds 19:06, 1 January 2021 (UTC)}} |
Hi, I notice that you have a tendency to relist AfDs with few but unanimous "delete" opinions, such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yogi Bizerk and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unicorn Gallery. What's your thinking behind this? In my view, an unanimous discussion after 7 days should be closed, no ifs or buts - we cannot expect all AfDs to attract more than a handful of opinions. Sandstein 13:08, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
I don't keep rhyme and reason around my AfDs.but it also doesn't seem encouraging. If you weren't an admin I would be off to a noticeboard to request a topic ban from administrative action at AfD. However, you are an admin and so that option feels different and seems to me that it would play out there differently, one way or another, because you're an admin. So yes I am asking you to voluntarily consider working some of the other backlogs we have instead of continuing to close AfDs as the easiest, and hopefully best, option. Barkeep49 ( talk) 18:32, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Not a single example has been provided where you action was inconsistent with guidelines or unreasonable. It's particularly disturbing that User:Barkeep49 found it appropriate to pile on to Sandstein's misguided and inapproptiate nitpicking.
Please keep up your terrific collegial work in whatever are you choose Missvain. Your work here is enormously helpful. That these two editors choose to be less than collegial and demanding of their personal standards instead of allowing editors to exercise their respective styles and good judgment is distressing but certainly goes far in explaining the many departures and the unhealthy editing environment we see here. Your reasonable, considerate, and collegial approach Missvain shines as a glowing example of how we should all aspire to edit and work together. Wikipedia would be a much better place with more grtting done by happier volunteers.
The relist guideline says "generally". We are always encouraged to use good judgment and your actions were quite reasonable in every example provided. We should be seeking more participation at AfDs not less. Happy New Year 2021. Enjoy life. Thank you for everything you do and all that you add to the project. FloridaArmy ( talk) 15:17, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
I'd also like to offer my many thanks for all your good work Missvain. I think I saw something about you working on chefs. I came across Draft:Hillel Echo-Hawk on User:Whisperjanes's page. I think it may be too soon but was an interestingnsubject worth keeping am eye on. I hope 2021 has lots of great things cooking up for you. Party on. FloridaArmy ( talk) 20:37, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for your work at AfD. I think the complaints you've received are ridiculous. For what it's worth, I think that your reasons for relisting three times when there's very little discussion is eminently clear, considering the fact that the template says the reasoning: to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus
. It might save you headache to just copy and paste that quote when relisting if people want to find reasons to complain. (And, by the way, it does not surprise me that there are so few women working in AfD.)
Urve (
talk)
10:42, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eliza Jane Ashley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Francis Cherry.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:20, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Missvain Last year, I created one article Sameera Aziz and with help of your neutral review and moderation, that article was accepted and put live on Wikipedia. This year, I have created one more article titled as Lahari Shari with in-depth research and have provided all relevant strong reliable sources. But there is one user on Wikipedia, who has nominated the page for deletion and there is no one else in participation who supports deletion in the discussion. I need your help to get it reviewed neutrally and to help me to improve the article and get approved. Also please ask your peer editors to jump in the discussion and do the needful. Mapd43 ( talk) 04:15, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for having closed the deletion discussion ;)
DYK ... that the choral conductor Michael Gläser was called in to lead the Thomanerchor in Leipzig when its musical director Georg Christoph Biller fell ill?
Have a good new year! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 09:14, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:30, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
|
|
Hi Missvain, thanks for supporting the art world and being a great Wikipedian! I picked up where someone else left off on Ayana Evans. I have had it looked over by two different Wikipedians and it was accepted by Chicdat, now, however, it is flagged for possible deletion.
What do you think I should do to save the page? There is a New York Times feature on the artist, that is the strongest source, and a number of sources ranging from features in major art publications (Hyperallergic) to mentions in books and blogazines. I do not think there are technical errors but I am not sure. I am not the subject, I do not know the subject, I am merely an art world professional who cares about female artists. Matriarch-info ( talk) 00:17, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for tips! Much appreciated Missvain. I have left a rationale for the article and made deletions of copyrighted text. Two people have voted Keep. Excuse the canvassing. Just getting the hang of this. Matriarch-info ( talk) 00:45, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
I don't appreciate the edit summary here, especially in light of the gatekeeping going on in that article while the main pov pusher is inserting BLP violations to democratic/leftist politicians, sourced to now deleted Facebook posts (and taken out of context.) But yeah, including that a primary proponent of conspiracy theories that lead to an act of terrorism, losing one of her largest platforms for agenda pushing is totally stupid. CUPIDICAE💕 19:05, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
I think Second impeachment of Donald Trump may need semi-protection again. Twenty minutes after expiration it got a disruptive edit, but idk how page protection works. Cheers, Ovinus ( talk) 23:29, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
You criticized me on the talk page and pined me, for not discussing an edit I made before posting it. I think that criticism was unwarranted as I had commented before I edited. I stated this on the talk page and you never bothered to correct your entry. -- FantinoFalco ( talk) 19:38, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia&diff=1001701273&oldid=1001623438
I added Recursion to the See Also section of Wikipedia's page about itself. Recursion is when an object is defined in terms of itself, so does the Recursion link fit?
The Epicness9000 ( talk) 22:05, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prerna Gupta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
DGG ( talk ) 10:05, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 14:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi, its kishandevpillai9472 I need help on publishing a drafted article... Idk how to do it because I'm a newcomer Tq Kishandevpillai9472 ( talk) 17:50, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Christa Winsloe 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
|
You may have noted the changes on this article: Sonoma County Historic Landmarks and Districts. It looks to me like and editor deleted numbers 178-192. I've tried to contact the editor, but have not seen him fix this. Maybe you have source data to fix this? Stay safe! MikeVdP ( talk) 20:40, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Happy New Year 2021 I hope your New Year holiday is enjoyable and the coming year is much better than the one we are leaving behind. Best wishes from Los Angeles. // Timothy :: talk |
Thank you and hello Rose Bulma ( talk) 16:59, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Friday Night Funkin'. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. BlackholeWA ( talk) 07:07, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Missvain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Lucas Zwirner, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 19:04, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
|
![]() | |
Six years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:23, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
![]()
|
--
Megalibrarygirl (
talk)
20:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello, Missvain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Lucas Zwirner".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford ( talk) 18:44, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
User:Missvain - I posted this to Wikipedia:Teahouse but saw your name on my Talk page.
I'm not a new editor at Wikipedia. My computer was murdered (RIP) and my Wiki password lost forever. Wiki says it can do nothing about accessing my account. Hence my User:Stretchrunner is dead (DNRIP). I created a new account, same name but now User:Stretchrunner II. So, I'm now a newbie and can't create a new article, not even a Redirect. When I created a new Draft Article, the message says to now wait up to five (5) months for a Review and they will determine if my article is okay and maybe will then allow me to create more new articles. Who can help solve this? Thanks. Stretchrunner II ( talk) 16:32, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
|
Hello, Missvain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Bharat Kamma, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 19:03, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
In the past, you've mentioned that you review congressional articles. I'm writing because of that, but from the heads up you left, that might not be something you're doing now. There's a race in LA CD2 (New Orleans) that has attracted the attention of a Polish national. He or she posts word salad at times and also doesn't understand that one can't post text that's not supported by the sources. The poster also can't understand how to fill in templates as directed in English, so botches such posts regularly. I've posted at the Karen Carter Peterson article, a runoff candidate running against Troy Carter (politician). He or she posts on the article about her opponent as well. Another editor also objected to and reverted one of the same deletions that Qba0202 repeatedly made to one of my posts. Today USER Qba0202 posted without logging in, apparently to avoid being blocked for repeated deletions. The sockpuppet IP# from which Qba0202 posted is 94.42.56.188 located in...Poland Mazowieckie Warsaw Immediately afterward he or she logged in to make another edit. If you can't take a look at this if the unfortunate circumstances to which you referred are ongoing, can you suggest some administrator or user who might be helpful? Either way, I do hope your situation to which you referred has improved. Thanks very much: Activist ( talk) 09:48, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 21:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi Missvain, you closed the Titcoin AfC discussion that I had launched by thanking everyone for assuming good faith. I couldn't help but wonder whether that was addressed to me, as nominator. Have I done something wrong? : JBchrch ( talk) 19:25, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Can I please get a copy of this deleted article in my user space or something. I'd like to try and create a redirect or something. ~ Kvng ( talk) 15:21, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of How I Quit Google to Sell Samosas. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. CommanderWaterford ( talk) 22:39, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, can you please re-check my comments at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soumendu Lahiri? The deletion discussion was not even properly sorted. No Bengali poet related categories were added to it. Any Bengali language editor can tell you the subject easily pass
WP:GNG. Can you please restore it and re-list the AfD? I will try to do the AfD sorting myself. Thanks.
AniksDutta (
talk) 12:34, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Done
Missvain (
talk)
16:53, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello: You recently did an AfD relisting of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palm Springs in popular culture. You know I am an interested editor on the article and I thank you. In order to expand the discussion I added PS in Pop Culture to Wikipedia:WikiProject Bibliographies. But I am unclear on how to post the AfD discussion on their project page. Would you please assist? Thank you. – S. Rich ( talk) 02:58, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi dear please check Behrad Shahriari article and remove speed delete because very good references Thanks
Behrad Shahriari Aliasghar ghorbandokht ( talk) 21:50, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Not remove tag? Why?
Aliasghar ghorbandokht ( talk) 21:51, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
More +15 Website have music and biography please help and remove tag
Thank you
Aliasghar ghorbandokht ( talk) 21:53, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
|
Hello; You just deleted Arman Darvish page, Can you notify me how to return it? I do appreciate Atena ak2 ( talk) 19:07, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello Missavain, you deleted the page "Hasan Moghimi" without being discussed properly. After two times being listed, there was only one person in favor of deletion. I clearly brought examples of the pages with less information and less references, but no one addressed my reasoning. This would discourage people to participate in the growth of Wikipedia. If I don't understand what is wrong with my article which I had created after days and days of research and work, why would I do that again? Here are three examples: Nikol Faridani, Parisa Damandan and Mauricio Alejo. Moreover, if references in Persian language (including Iranian national awards) are not valued, there would be a sense of discrimination. Please note that search result for "Hasan Moghimi" returns 1130 in the English language and more than 40K in the Persian. If only the English language is matter of importance, it means giving priority to people living in English speaking countries. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erfan2017 ( talk • contribs) 21:01, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
There is a difference between a delete and speedy delete, I am curious why you say speedy delete for a normal delete process. :/ Govvy ( talk) 08:29, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Also, why are you closing articles a little earlier than the full seven days? here and here, it certainly hasn't been 168 hours yet :/ Govvy ( talk) 09:07, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Hasan Moghimi. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Erfan2017 ( talk) 20:38, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Please Missvain ( talk) you unfairly deleted the SHE (Yvonne Ohene Djan) article despite no consensus reached. Please I'm requesting for a deletion review because I believe it was wrongly deleted. Thank you. Mellowdeaous ( talk) 10:45, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Heavy equipment modelling. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:00, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, both above mentioned articles were deleted per G8 as redirects to Nagi-P Software (deleted via AfD you closed: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nagi-P Software). However, both NS-Tower and NS-Shaft were stand-alone articles at the time of that AfD (or my memory fails me again?). I wonder, what happened? Pavlor ( talk) 05:12, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 45 | ← | Archive 50 | Archive 51 | Archive 52 |
Happy
New Year!
Send New Year cheer by adding {{
subst:Happy New Year snowman}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.
![]() |
Women in Red Women in Asia contest |
Missvain Thank you for your December 2020 additions! WomenArtistUpdates ( talk) 01:57, 1 January 2021 (UTC) |
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Dr. Paras. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Barmitzg ( talk) 12:44, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
Thank you for your hard work and efforts with AFD-closing and relisting,
Without your help here (and on Commons) both projects would be worse off without your help so wanted to say thank you for what you do. Unfortunately AFD is one of those areas where you're damned if you do and you're damned if you don't! so ignore the comments and keep doing what you're doing which is helping the project and like other areas doing a thankless mundane task so thank you for all that you do here!. Take care and I hope you and yours have a happy, healthy and safe 2021, Warm Regards, – Davey2010 Talk 17:51, 1 January 2021 (UTC) |
I just wanted to share, I've recently spent a lot of time working on articles about Portland restaurants, even promoting 20+ to Good article status in the last couple months. I'm not much of a "foodie" but your work on restaurant articles inspired me to document Portland's dining scene, especially given the pandemic's impact on the food and restaurant industries. Anyway, just wanted to say thanks for the inspiration. I'd love to see many more Wikipedia articles about notable restaurants for various cities. Stay healthy, and Happy New Year and happy editing, --- Another Believer ( Talk) 15:56, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
I want to express my gratitude for your diligent work with AfD. As a deletionist at heart, I know how difficult AfD can be. Please don't feel downhearted or deflated. Wikipedia sometimes tends to focus on those who do the most work, as you are doing, and not those areas which need work.
Be good, and strong, and happy. You're doing a great job. doktorb words deeds 19:06, 1 January 2021 (UTC)}} |
Hi, I notice that you have a tendency to relist AfDs with few but unanimous "delete" opinions, such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yogi Bizerk and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unicorn Gallery. What's your thinking behind this? In my view, an unanimous discussion after 7 days should be closed, no ifs or buts - we cannot expect all AfDs to attract more than a handful of opinions. Sandstein 13:08, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
I don't keep rhyme and reason around my AfDs.but it also doesn't seem encouraging. If you weren't an admin I would be off to a noticeboard to request a topic ban from administrative action at AfD. However, you are an admin and so that option feels different and seems to me that it would play out there differently, one way or another, because you're an admin. So yes I am asking you to voluntarily consider working some of the other backlogs we have instead of continuing to close AfDs as the easiest, and hopefully best, option. Barkeep49 ( talk) 18:32, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Not a single example has been provided where you action was inconsistent with guidelines or unreasonable. It's particularly disturbing that User:Barkeep49 found it appropriate to pile on to Sandstein's misguided and inapproptiate nitpicking.
Please keep up your terrific collegial work in whatever are you choose Missvain. Your work here is enormously helpful. That these two editors choose to be less than collegial and demanding of their personal standards instead of allowing editors to exercise their respective styles and good judgment is distressing but certainly goes far in explaining the many departures and the unhealthy editing environment we see here. Your reasonable, considerate, and collegial approach Missvain shines as a glowing example of how we should all aspire to edit and work together. Wikipedia would be a much better place with more grtting done by happier volunteers.
The relist guideline says "generally". We are always encouraged to use good judgment and your actions were quite reasonable in every example provided. We should be seeking more participation at AfDs not less. Happy New Year 2021. Enjoy life. Thank you for everything you do and all that you add to the project. FloridaArmy ( talk) 15:17, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
I'd also like to offer my many thanks for all your good work Missvain. I think I saw something about you working on chefs. I came across Draft:Hillel Echo-Hawk on User:Whisperjanes's page. I think it may be too soon but was an interestingnsubject worth keeping am eye on. I hope 2021 has lots of great things cooking up for you. Party on. FloridaArmy ( talk) 20:37, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for your work at AfD. I think the complaints you've received are ridiculous. For what it's worth, I think that your reasons for relisting three times when there's very little discussion is eminently clear, considering the fact that the template says the reasoning: to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus
. It might save you headache to just copy and paste that quote when relisting if people want to find reasons to complain. (And, by the way, it does not surprise me that there are so few women working in AfD.)
Urve (
talk)
10:42, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eliza Jane Ashley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Francis Cherry.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:20, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Missvain Last year, I created one article Sameera Aziz and with help of your neutral review and moderation, that article was accepted and put live on Wikipedia. This year, I have created one more article titled as Lahari Shari with in-depth research and have provided all relevant strong reliable sources. But there is one user on Wikipedia, who has nominated the page for deletion and there is no one else in participation who supports deletion in the discussion. I need your help to get it reviewed neutrally and to help me to improve the article and get approved. Also please ask your peer editors to jump in the discussion and do the needful. Mapd43 ( talk) 04:15, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for having closed the deletion discussion ;)
DYK ... that the choral conductor Michael Gläser was called in to lead the Thomanerchor in Leipzig when its musical director Georg Christoph Biller fell ill?
Have a good new year! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 09:14, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:30, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
|
|
Hi Missvain, thanks for supporting the art world and being a great Wikipedian! I picked up where someone else left off on Ayana Evans. I have had it looked over by two different Wikipedians and it was accepted by Chicdat, now, however, it is flagged for possible deletion.
What do you think I should do to save the page? There is a New York Times feature on the artist, that is the strongest source, and a number of sources ranging from features in major art publications (Hyperallergic) to mentions in books and blogazines. I do not think there are technical errors but I am not sure. I am not the subject, I do not know the subject, I am merely an art world professional who cares about female artists. Matriarch-info ( talk) 00:17, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for tips! Much appreciated Missvain. I have left a rationale for the article and made deletions of copyrighted text. Two people have voted Keep. Excuse the canvassing. Just getting the hang of this. Matriarch-info ( talk) 00:45, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
I don't appreciate the edit summary here, especially in light of the gatekeeping going on in that article while the main pov pusher is inserting BLP violations to democratic/leftist politicians, sourced to now deleted Facebook posts (and taken out of context.) But yeah, including that a primary proponent of conspiracy theories that lead to an act of terrorism, losing one of her largest platforms for agenda pushing is totally stupid. CUPIDICAE💕 19:05, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
I think Second impeachment of Donald Trump may need semi-protection again. Twenty minutes after expiration it got a disruptive edit, but idk how page protection works. Cheers, Ovinus ( talk) 23:29, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
You criticized me on the talk page and pined me, for not discussing an edit I made before posting it. I think that criticism was unwarranted as I had commented before I edited. I stated this on the talk page and you never bothered to correct your entry. -- FantinoFalco ( talk) 19:38, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia&diff=1001701273&oldid=1001623438
I added Recursion to the See Also section of Wikipedia's page about itself. Recursion is when an object is defined in terms of itself, so does the Recursion link fit?
The Epicness9000 ( talk) 22:05, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prerna Gupta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
DGG ( talk ) 10:05, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 14:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi, its kishandevpillai9472 I need help on publishing a drafted article... Idk how to do it because I'm a newcomer Tq Kishandevpillai9472 ( talk) 17:50, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Christa Winsloe 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
|
You may have noted the changes on this article: Sonoma County Historic Landmarks and Districts. It looks to me like and editor deleted numbers 178-192. I've tried to contact the editor, but have not seen him fix this. Maybe you have source data to fix this? Stay safe! MikeVdP ( talk) 20:40, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Happy New Year 2021 I hope your New Year holiday is enjoyable and the coming year is much better than the one we are leaving behind. Best wishes from Los Angeles. // Timothy :: talk |
Thank you and hello Rose Bulma ( talk) 16:59, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Friday Night Funkin'. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. BlackholeWA ( talk) 07:07, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Missvain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Lucas Zwirner, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 19:04, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
|
![]() | |
Six years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:23, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
![]()
|
--
Megalibrarygirl (
talk)
20:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello, Missvain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Lucas Zwirner".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford ( talk) 18:44, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
User:Missvain - I posted this to Wikipedia:Teahouse but saw your name on my Talk page.
I'm not a new editor at Wikipedia. My computer was murdered (RIP) and my Wiki password lost forever. Wiki says it can do nothing about accessing my account. Hence my User:Stretchrunner is dead (DNRIP). I created a new account, same name but now User:Stretchrunner II. So, I'm now a newbie and can't create a new article, not even a Redirect. When I created a new Draft Article, the message says to now wait up to five (5) months for a Review and they will determine if my article is okay and maybe will then allow me to create more new articles. Who can help solve this? Thanks. Stretchrunner II ( talk) 16:32, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
|
Hello, Missvain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Bharat Kamma, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 19:03, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
In the past, you've mentioned that you review congressional articles. I'm writing because of that, but from the heads up you left, that might not be something you're doing now. There's a race in LA CD2 (New Orleans) that has attracted the attention of a Polish national. He or she posts word salad at times and also doesn't understand that one can't post text that's not supported by the sources. The poster also can't understand how to fill in templates as directed in English, so botches such posts regularly. I've posted at the Karen Carter Peterson article, a runoff candidate running against Troy Carter (politician). He or she posts on the article about her opponent as well. Another editor also objected to and reverted one of the same deletions that Qba0202 repeatedly made to one of my posts. Today USER Qba0202 posted without logging in, apparently to avoid being blocked for repeated deletions. The sockpuppet IP# from which Qba0202 posted is 94.42.56.188 located in...Poland Mazowieckie Warsaw Immediately afterward he or she logged in to make another edit. If you can't take a look at this if the unfortunate circumstances to which you referred are ongoing, can you suggest some administrator or user who might be helpful? Either way, I do hope your situation to which you referred has improved. Thanks very much: Activist ( talk) 09:48, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 21:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi Missvain, you closed the Titcoin AfC discussion that I had launched by thanking everyone for assuming good faith. I couldn't help but wonder whether that was addressed to me, as nominator. Have I done something wrong? : JBchrch ( talk) 19:25, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Can I please get a copy of this deleted article in my user space or something. I'd like to try and create a redirect or something. ~ Kvng ( talk) 15:21, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of How I Quit Google to Sell Samosas. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. CommanderWaterford ( talk) 22:39, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, can you please re-check my comments at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soumendu Lahiri? The deletion discussion was not even properly sorted. No Bengali poet related categories were added to it. Any Bengali language editor can tell you the subject easily pass
WP:GNG. Can you please restore it and re-list the AfD? I will try to do the AfD sorting myself. Thanks.
AniksDutta (
talk) 12:34, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Done
Missvain (
talk)
16:53, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello: You recently did an AfD relisting of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palm Springs in popular culture. You know I am an interested editor on the article and I thank you. In order to expand the discussion I added PS in Pop Culture to Wikipedia:WikiProject Bibliographies. But I am unclear on how to post the AfD discussion on their project page. Would you please assist? Thank you. – S. Rich ( talk) 02:58, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi dear please check Behrad Shahriari article and remove speed delete because very good references Thanks
Behrad Shahriari Aliasghar ghorbandokht ( talk) 21:50, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Not remove tag? Why?
Aliasghar ghorbandokht ( talk) 21:51, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
More +15 Website have music and biography please help and remove tag
Thank you
Aliasghar ghorbandokht ( talk) 21:53, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
|
Hello; You just deleted Arman Darvish page, Can you notify me how to return it? I do appreciate Atena ak2 ( talk) 19:07, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello Missavain, you deleted the page "Hasan Moghimi" without being discussed properly. After two times being listed, there was only one person in favor of deletion. I clearly brought examples of the pages with less information and less references, but no one addressed my reasoning. This would discourage people to participate in the growth of Wikipedia. If I don't understand what is wrong with my article which I had created after days and days of research and work, why would I do that again? Here are three examples: Nikol Faridani, Parisa Damandan and Mauricio Alejo. Moreover, if references in Persian language (including Iranian national awards) are not valued, there would be a sense of discrimination. Please note that search result for "Hasan Moghimi" returns 1130 in the English language and more than 40K in the Persian. If only the English language is matter of importance, it means giving priority to people living in English speaking countries. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erfan2017 ( talk • contribs) 21:01, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
There is a difference between a delete and speedy delete, I am curious why you say speedy delete for a normal delete process. :/ Govvy ( talk) 08:29, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Also, why are you closing articles a little earlier than the full seven days? here and here, it certainly hasn't been 168 hours yet :/ Govvy ( talk) 09:07, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Hasan Moghimi. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Erfan2017 ( talk) 20:38, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Please Missvain ( talk) you unfairly deleted the SHE (Yvonne Ohene Djan) article despite no consensus reached. Please I'm requesting for a deletion review because I believe it was wrongly deleted. Thank you. Mellowdeaous ( talk) 10:45, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Heavy equipment modelling. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:00, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, both above mentioned articles were deleted per G8 as redirects to Nagi-P Software (deleted via AfD you closed: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nagi-P Software). However, both NS-Tower and NS-Shaft were stand-alone articles at the time of that AfD (or my memory fails me again?). I wonder, what happened? Pavlor ( talk) 05:12, 17 May 2021 (UTC)