From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Michael Stanz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Wane Enterprises, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{ helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  E. Fokker ( talk) 20:59, 26 October 2010 (UTC) reply

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wane Enterprises requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. E. Fokker ( talk) 20:59, 26 October 2010 (UTC) reply

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Wane Enterprises, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{ hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. E. Fokker ( talk) 21:13, 26 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Wane Enterprises. Please use the {{ hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Corvus cornix talk 21:52, 26 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Conflict of interest

Since you designed the company's logo, it's clear you have a conflict of interest with it:

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Wane Enterprises, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. — C.Fred ( talk) 21:51, 26 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Do not remove speedy deletion or maintenance templates from articles you created

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Wane Enterprises. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — C.Fred ( talk) 22:04, 26 October 2010 (UTC) reply

This is the last warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits; the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Wane Enterprises, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Kinu t/ c 22:15, 26 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The article Bruse Wane has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insufficient WP:RS indicating subject meets WP:BIO. Own albums are self-produced and only one album of dubious notability as a producer, and thus failing WP:MUSIC. Attempts to assert notability through association with others in industry, but none of this can be credibly or untrivially sourced. Also apparent WP:COI by the creator.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{ dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kinu t/ c 22:30, 28 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Why is this page being so intensely scrutinized for deletion. The article sites Bruse Wane as the artist/lyricist not the producer to the musical compositions. Artist like Jay-Z, and Buckshot have released there own music this is common place among many notable musicians. The article clearly state that the Ep that was released by Bruse Wane was done through Tuncore Distribution which a Major Distribution arm in the current preferred means of music distribution digital. Major artist such as Jay-Z, Aretha Franklin, And Trent Reznor to name a few utilize Tuncore Distribution. Attempts to assert notability through association with others in industry, but none of this can be credibly or untrivially sourced. The article provides links with video footage of Bruse Wane in the presence of the notable artist mentioned in this article. When has the human eye become a none reliable or credible source. The article should not be deleted. I will go over the WP:COI rules and re edit the article Michael Stanz ( talk) 00:03, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. User talk:Explicitξ xplicit 00:28, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The recent edit you made to User talk:Explicit constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tide rolls 00:28, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Michael Stanz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Wane Enterprises, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{ helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  E. Fokker ( talk) 20:59, 26 October 2010 (UTC) reply

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wane Enterprises requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. E. Fokker ( talk) 20:59, 26 October 2010 (UTC) reply

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Wane Enterprises, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{ hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. E. Fokker ( talk) 21:13, 26 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Wane Enterprises. Please use the {{ hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Corvus cornix talk 21:52, 26 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Conflict of interest

Since you designed the company's logo, it's clear you have a conflict of interest with it:

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Wane Enterprises, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. — C.Fred ( talk) 21:51, 26 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Do not remove speedy deletion or maintenance templates from articles you created

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Wane Enterprises. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — C.Fred ( talk) 22:04, 26 October 2010 (UTC) reply

This is the last warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits; the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Wane Enterprises, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Kinu t/ c 22:15, 26 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The article Bruse Wane has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insufficient WP:RS indicating subject meets WP:BIO. Own albums are self-produced and only one album of dubious notability as a producer, and thus failing WP:MUSIC. Attempts to assert notability through association with others in industry, but none of this can be credibly or untrivially sourced. Also apparent WP:COI by the creator.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{ dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kinu t/ c 22:30, 28 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Why is this page being so intensely scrutinized for deletion. The article sites Bruse Wane as the artist/lyricist not the producer to the musical compositions. Artist like Jay-Z, and Buckshot have released there own music this is common place among many notable musicians. The article clearly state that the Ep that was released by Bruse Wane was done through Tuncore Distribution which a Major Distribution arm in the current preferred means of music distribution digital. Major artist such as Jay-Z, Aretha Franklin, And Trent Reznor to name a few utilize Tuncore Distribution. Attempts to assert notability through association with others in industry, but none of this can be credibly or untrivially sourced. The article provides links with video footage of Bruse Wane in the presence of the notable artist mentioned in this article. When has the human eye become a none reliable or credible source. The article should not be deleted. I will go over the WP:COI rules and re edit the article Michael Stanz ( talk) 00:03, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. User talk:Explicitξ xplicit 00:28, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The recent edit you made to User talk:Explicit constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tide rolls 00:28, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook