2016
The article
Taxonomy of Liliaceae you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Taxonomy of Liliaceae for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Tylototriton --
Tylototriton (
talk) 23:21, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Maculation. Since you had some involvement with the Maculation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 05:47, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
To get the completely correct formatting of the "in" citations at
Lilioid monocots, as we've discussed before, the {{
harvc}} template would have to be used, because of the refusal to allow |contribution=
without |title=
in any of the cite/citation templates. I don't have the energy (at present anyway). Sigh...
Peter coxhead (
talk) 21:13, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
I had to return to the earlier version because the live one wasn't working correctly when used inline. My experience is that it can be very tricky to stop templates adding newlines; I think that somewhere among your added comments one slipped in. I suggest only updating the sandbox version and checking the testcases before going live. Have a look at Template:Botanist/testcases now, including the generated references. Peter coxhead ( talk) 17:32, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Although User:Ucucha/HarvErrors.js flags any use of {{citation ...}} or {{cite .. |mode=CS2 ..}} as an error if there is nothing actually using the generated id, this is not an error. There's no policy or guidance that requires these ids to be used; indeed, any such requirement would be against policy, since it would prevent CS2 formats in bibliographies, further reading, general sources, etc., whereas it's policy to be neutral on consistent citation style. Only the first of the checks in User:Ucucha/HarvErrors.js is actually an error check. The second check could be a warning note, perhaps, but certainly not an error.
This has already been raised at User talk:Ucucha/HarvErrors#Unused anchors. Peter coxhead ( talk) 17:55, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
|
Amaryllidoideae Barnstar |
For your amazing work on Amaryllidaceae and related articles. Your passion is very inspiring! MCEllis ( talk) 02:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC) |
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Emonocot.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:29, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Emonocot.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 10:21, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
I find it very odd that the most important source for monocots, namely WCSP, isn't included in the taxon bar template when it's added to articles like Habranthus. Can you explain the value of this template to me? I really can't see it. Peter coxhead ( talk) 22:33, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Lilioid monocots you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Sainsf --
Sainsf (
talk) 09:41, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
I truly like your friendly demeanor and cooperative nature. I have collaborated with you quite a while ago on an article I find difficult to recall, but your nature is the same as it was - one of those sunshiny, tireless Wikipedians! Cheers! Sainsf <^> Talk all words 15:52, 2 March 2016 (UTC) |
Rather than add to what's supposed to be a side issue in the MOS talk, I thought I'd comment here. I was very enthusiastic about {{ sfn}} and similar templates when I first found them, and gave up my earlier practice of
I'm wondering now if in a long article it might be better to:
This would seem to avoid the creation of long sfn's once there's a need for URLs, which is generally the case with pages of old documents at the BHL, for example.
I often get caught by old journal articles; these were regularly much longer than today, so I want to give a URL to a section, but {{ cite journal}} doesn't allow any level below title – you can't have a contribution as in a book. I'm still not sure of the best way to handle such cases. Peter coxhead ( talk) 18:43, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
I tried that in Gethyllis (ref 1) - it has to be harvnb -- Michael Goodyear ( talk) 14:42, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
The article
Lilioid monocots you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Lilioid monocots for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Sainsf --
Sainsf (
talk) 19:41, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hippeastrinae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fimbriate. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:51, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
This may be of interest, since you were involved in previous discussions about these guidelines and their impact: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Cleaning up and normalizing MOS:ENGVAR, WP:CITEVAR, etc. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 12:25, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Women Writers worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Sent by Rosiestep ( talk) 13:13, 26 March 2016 (UTC) via WP:MassMessage
Thanks for uploading File:Aloysandmarieliechstenstein.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:26, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Join us! | |
---|---|
Women Scientists - worldwide online edit-a-thon - ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 01:59, 1 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
Hi Michael Goodyear. I'm an editor (not very active till now) of the Italian Wikipedia, where the gender gap is a real issue. I'm trying to participate to an IEG with the project "Women are everywhere". You will find the draft at this link https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG/Women_are_everywhere It would be great if you could have a look at it. I need any kind of suggestion or advice to improve it. Support or endorsement would be fantastic. Many thanks, -- Kenzia ( talk) 11:10, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Women in Espionage worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
--
Rosiestep (
talk) 03:54, 12 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
(To subscribe,
Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe,
Women in Red/Opt-out list)
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Women in Photography
|
--
Rosiestep (
talk) 12:33, 24 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
(To subscribe,
Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe,
Women in Red/Opt-out list)
![]() | |
---|---|
Women artists of Middle East / North Africa
|
--
Rosiestep (
talk) 14:16, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
(To subscribe,
Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe,
Women in Red/Opt-out list)
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Women in Entertainment worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 02:14, 24 May 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage (To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
LGBTQ worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
Delivered by Rosiestep ( talk) 04:02, 10 June 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage. (To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Women in Halls of Fame worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 09:01, 23 June 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage (To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
I have removed part of your addition to the above article, as it appears to have been directly copied from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs110/en/, a copyright web page. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions or if you think I may have made a mistake. — Diannaa ( talk) 20:58, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Wikipedia and United Nations Women Project |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) Delivered by Rosiestep ( talk) via MassMessage 04:27, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Indigenous women editathon &
Polar women editathon |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 21:08, 24 July 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Women's health you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Bluerasberry --
Bluerasberry (
talk) 19:40, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence |
Thanks for all the work you're doing on women's health :-) Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 16:58, 2 August 2016 (UTC) |
I am eager to help edit this article in such a way that it could become a good article. I am completely unfamiliar with this type of referencing and have never used it at all. I don't know where to go from here. Is it possible to get up to speed on this style of referencing to improve this article in a timely manner? Best Regards,
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Berger (Politiker) Litho.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 18:32, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Women in Nursing editathon &
Women Labor Activists editathon |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
![]() ![]()
| |
---|---|
Women in Architecture &
Women in Archaeology editathons ![]() |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 20:05, 24 September 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]() |
The Writer's Barnstar |
Dear Michael Goodyear, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, especially your recent creation of Taxonomy of Allium. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, Anupam Talk 00:52, 27 September 2016 (UTC) |
Template:Anatolian themata has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Constantine
✍ 09:46, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]()
| |
---|---|
Announcing two exciting online editathons ![]() |
(To subscribe: Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:07, 23 October 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Michael, I've almost completed the GA review of this article, but a couple of images need attention. I think you didn't get pinged by the GA bot as there's already a premature notice for this article above, so I'm simulating the bot as best I can... All the best, Chiswick Chap ( talk) 16:28, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
The article
Women's health you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Women's health for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Chiswick Chap --
Chiswick Chap (
talk) 16:41, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Michael Goodyear. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
![]()
| |
---|---|
Two new topics for our online editathons ![]() |
(To subscribe: Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 22:43, 23 November 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi Michael, i made this macro stacked image of Pelargonium zonale (Geraniaceae). Looking inside, there are also derived by colors, foliage, size. Size of this flower is 25 mm in diameter, petal is around 2,5 mm (around 5-6 mm tall). Could you help me with taxonomy to select which Zonal is it. -- PetarM ( talk) 08:11, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
On 13 December 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Women's health, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the World Health Organization says that a focus on reproductive health alone prevents progress in ensuring quality women's healthcare? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Women's health. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Women's health), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Dear Michael - I see you've helped out with formatting the Rossini bibliography in the past. I'm unsure how best to reference different chapters (several potential good RS :-) from The Cambridge Companion to Rossini, [1] and I wondered if you might like to set the ball rolling. For example, strictly speaking I should be sourcing the statement in the lead beginning "A return to Paris from Italy in 1855 was followed by better health..." and Richard Osborne's chapter on Rossini's life would do the trick. [2] I'm not sure what the most reader-friendly approach is...
May I also CONGRATULATE you on improving Women's health?! A much-needed and highly relevant expansion, imo. [1]
Best wishes, Robin 86.190.132.143 ( talk) 23:12, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
{{
cite book}}
: |editor=
has generic name (
help)
2016
The article
Taxonomy of Liliaceae you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Taxonomy of Liliaceae for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Tylototriton --
Tylototriton (
talk) 23:21, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Maculation. Since you had some involvement with the Maculation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 05:47, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
To get the completely correct formatting of the "in" citations at
Lilioid monocots, as we've discussed before, the {{
harvc}} template would have to be used, because of the refusal to allow |contribution=
without |title=
in any of the cite/citation templates. I don't have the energy (at present anyway). Sigh...
Peter coxhead (
talk) 21:13, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
I had to return to the earlier version because the live one wasn't working correctly when used inline. My experience is that it can be very tricky to stop templates adding newlines; I think that somewhere among your added comments one slipped in. I suggest only updating the sandbox version and checking the testcases before going live. Have a look at Template:Botanist/testcases now, including the generated references. Peter coxhead ( talk) 17:32, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Although User:Ucucha/HarvErrors.js flags any use of {{citation ...}} or {{cite .. |mode=CS2 ..}} as an error if there is nothing actually using the generated id, this is not an error. There's no policy or guidance that requires these ids to be used; indeed, any such requirement would be against policy, since it would prevent CS2 formats in bibliographies, further reading, general sources, etc., whereas it's policy to be neutral on consistent citation style. Only the first of the checks in User:Ucucha/HarvErrors.js is actually an error check. The second check could be a warning note, perhaps, but certainly not an error.
This has already been raised at User talk:Ucucha/HarvErrors#Unused anchors. Peter coxhead ( talk) 17:55, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
|
Amaryllidoideae Barnstar |
For your amazing work on Amaryllidaceae and related articles. Your passion is very inspiring! MCEllis ( talk) 02:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC) |
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Emonocot.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:29, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Emonocot.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 10:21, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
I find it very odd that the most important source for monocots, namely WCSP, isn't included in the taxon bar template when it's added to articles like Habranthus. Can you explain the value of this template to me? I really can't see it. Peter coxhead ( talk) 22:33, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Lilioid monocots you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Sainsf --
Sainsf (
talk) 09:41, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
I truly like your friendly demeanor and cooperative nature. I have collaborated with you quite a while ago on an article I find difficult to recall, but your nature is the same as it was - one of those sunshiny, tireless Wikipedians! Cheers! Sainsf <^> Talk all words 15:52, 2 March 2016 (UTC) |
Rather than add to what's supposed to be a side issue in the MOS talk, I thought I'd comment here. I was very enthusiastic about {{ sfn}} and similar templates when I first found them, and gave up my earlier practice of
I'm wondering now if in a long article it might be better to:
This would seem to avoid the creation of long sfn's once there's a need for URLs, which is generally the case with pages of old documents at the BHL, for example.
I often get caught by old journal articles; these were regularly much longer than today, so I want to give a URL to a section, but {{ cite journal}} doesn't allow any level below title – you can't have a contribution as in a book. I'm still not sure of the best way to handle such cases. Peter coxhead ( talk) 18:43, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
I tried that in Gethyllis (ref 1) - it has to be harvnb -- Michael Goodyear ( talk) 14:42, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
The article
Lilioid monocots you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Lilioid monocots for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Sainsf --
Sainsf (
talk) 19:41, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hippeastrinae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fimbriate. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:51, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
This may be of interest, since you were involved in previous discussions about these guidelines and their impact: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Cleaning up and normalizing MOS:ENGVAR, WP:CITEVAR, etc. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 12:25, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Women Writers worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Sent by Rosiestep ( talk) 13:13, 26 March 2016 (UTC) via WP:MassMessage
Thanks for uploading File:Aloysandmarieliechstenstein.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:26, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Join us! | |
---|---|
Women Scientists - worldwide online edit-a-thon - ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 01:59, 1 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
Hi Michael Goodyear. I'm an editor (not very active till now) of the Italian Wikipedia, where the gender gap is a real issue. I'm trying to participate to an IEG with the project "Women are everywhere". You will find the draft at this link https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG/Women_are_everywhere It would be great if you could have a look at it. I need any kind of suggestion or advice to improve it. Support or endorsement would be fantastic. Many thanks, -- Kenzia ( talk) 11:10, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Women in Espionage worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
--
Rosiestep (
talk) 03:54, 12 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
(To subscribe,
Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe,
Women in Red/Opt-out list)
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Women in Photography
|
--
Rosiestep (
talk) 12:33, 24 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
(To subscribe,
Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe,
Women in Red/Opt-out list)
![]() | |
---|---|
Women artists of Middle East / North Africa
|
--
Rosiestep (
talk) 14:16, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
(To subscribe,
Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe,
Women in Red/Opt-out list)
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Women in Entertainment worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 02:14, 24 May 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage (To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
LGBTQ worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
Delivered by Rosiestep ( talk) 04:02, 10 June 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage. (To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Women in Halls of Fame worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 09:01, 23 June 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage (To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
I have removed part of your addition to the above article, as it appears to have been directly copied from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs110/en/, a copyright web page. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions or if you think I may have made a mistake. — Diannaa ( talk) 20:58, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Wikipedia and United Nations Women Project |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) Delivered by Rosiestep ( talk) via MassMessage 04:27, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Indigenous women editathon &
Polar women editathon |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 21:08, 24 July 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Women's health you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Bluerasberry --
Bluerasberry (
talk) 19:40, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence |
Thanks for all the work you're doing on women's health :-) Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 16:58, 2 August 2016 (UTC) |
I am eager to help edit this article in such a way that it could become a good article. I am completely unfamiliar with this type of referencing and have never used it at all. I don't know where to go from here. Is it possible to get up to speed on this style of referencing to improve this article in a timely manner? Best Regards,
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Berger (Politiker) Litho.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 18:32, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Women in Nursing editathon &
Women Labor Activists editathon |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
![]() ![]()
| |
---|---|
Women in Architecture &
Women in Archaeology editathons ![]() |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 20:05, 24 September 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]() |
The Writer's Barnstar |
Dear Michael Goodyear, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, especially your recent creation of Taxonomy of Allium. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, Anupam Talk 00:52, 27 September 2016 (UTC) |
Template:Anatolian themata has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Constantine
✍ 09:46, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]()
| |
---|---|
Announcing two exciting online editathons ![]() |
(To subscribe: Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:07, 23 October 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Michael, I've almost completed the GA review of this article, but a couple of images need attention. I think you didn't get pinged by the GA bot as there's already a premature notice for this article above, so I'm simulating the bot as best I can... All the best, Chiswick Chap ( talk) 16:28, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
The article
Women's health you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Women's health for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Chiswick Chap --
Chiswick Chap (
talk) 16:41, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Michael Goodyear. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
![]()
| |
---|---|
Two new topics for our online editathons ![]() |
(To subscribe: Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 22:43, 23 November 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi Michael, i made this macro stacked image of Pelargonium zonale (Geraniaceae). Looking inside, there are also derived by colors, foliage, size. Size of this flower is 25 mm in diameter, petal is around 2,5 mm (around 5-6 mm tall). Could you help me with taxonomy to select which Zonal is it. -- PetarM ( talk) 08:11, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
On 13 December 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Women's health, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the World Health Organization says that a focus on reproductive health alone prevents progress in ensuring quality women's healthcare? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Women's health. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Women's health), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Dear Michael - I see you've helped out with formatting the Rossini bibliography in the past. I'm unsure how best to reference different chapters (several potential good RS :-) from The Cambridge Companion to Rossini, [1] and I wondered if you might like to set the ball rolling. For example, strictly speaking I should be sourcing the statement in the lead beginning "A return to Paris from Italy in 1855 was followed by better health..." and Richard Osborne's chapter on Rossini's life would do the trick. [2] I'm not sure what the most reader-friendly approach is...
May I also CONGRATULATE you on improving Women's health?! A much-needed and highly relevant expansion, imo. [1]
Best wishes, Robin 86.190.132.143 ( talk) 23:12, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
{{
cite book}}
: |editor=
has generic name (
help)