![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
You can read my comment at Talk:Slovakia national bandy team. Bandy Hoppsan ( talk) 22:38, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello Meatsgains. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sonny arguinzoni, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims importance/significance of the subject. Thank you. So Why 07:00, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Hallo,
why did you tagged my article aboud JackEL? What is the problem with it? Can you please give me some advice what to change.
with kind regards Jakabl — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakabl ( talk • contribs) 02:26, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
ok. Thanks for your criticism. the article is not finished now. I'm going to work on it the next days. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakabl ( talk • contribs) 02:36, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Isn't it a little bit odd that after you reviewed the article, it got speedied? Doesn't reviewing it pretty much mean that you made a judgment that it didn't meet any speedy deletion criteria? How then could someone else come along and overturn that judgment?
It would be like if someone removed the speedy tag and then someone else added it back. I thought CSD was only for uncontroversial cases, yet if your judgment differed from someone else's, that means there was a controversy. Smooth alligator ( talk) 19:02, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
A thanks for withdrawing the recent AfD nom for the 2017–18 Ahmad Shah Abdali 4-day Tournament. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 06:41, 19 October 2017 (UTC) |
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I'm MRD2014. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, M.A.C.A., and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
— MRD2014 Talk • Edits • Help! 02:02, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Illusory truth effect you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Wugapodes --
Wugapodes (
talk)
06:41, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
The article
Illusory truth effect you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Illusory truth effect for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Wugapodes --
Wugapodes (
talk)
08:21, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi Meatsgains, thanks for fighting linkrot. However, I just ran into an edit [1] where so many things went wrong that it is provoking my comment. In the above mentioned edit you added:
|title=Sony präsentiert E PZ 18–110mm F4 G OSS für Videografen - photoscala|first=About The Author Redaktion|last=photoscala|publisher=
In this example, you erroneously added the publisher (photoscala) to the |title=
parameter, but added an empty parameter |publisher=
and also added the publisher to the |last=
parameter, which is meant for the surname of the author (Vieten), not the publisher. As |first=
parameter you added "About The Author Redaktion", which does not make sense at all. This entry should have had the author's forename "Martin". An alternative to specifying the actual name of the author Martin Vieten, it would also have been possible to use the |author=
parameter for a string like "photoscala Redaktion". If the author is not mentioned in the article at all, but it is clear that it must have been a staff writer, we typically leave this HTML comment |author=<!-- Staff writer, no byline -->
in order to keep future editors from searching for the author name again.
On the cosmetical side, if an article is already using a consistent style for citations, we usually try to maintain this for new entries. In this case, all the older citations had their parameter names prefixed by a space before the pipe symbol (example: " |parameter=xyz"), which creates a more readable flow in narrow edit windows than omitting the space. Old parameter names |first=
and |last=
are fine in general, but the usage of the more modern |author-first=
and |author-last=
(with hyphen) is preferred in order to better distinguish them from |editor-first=
and |editor-last=
parameters.
I haven't checked if this the only example where things went wrong, but please keep in mind that the {{ cite}} templates create metadata and are also "harvested" by bots to fill external databases, so it is quite important that parameters don't contain incorrect data. So, please check the data you fill into citations and don't blindly rely on the tools, or the whole effort might be counter-productive... Actually, if you are not sure about some citation data, it is better to just skip the citation and leave it to another editor to fill the gap than inserting incorrect data.
Another suggestion to fight linkrot: Still accessible links should be check for being archived in the Wayback machine ( http://www.archive.org) and the archived links be added to our references as well.
Hope it helps. -- Matthiaspaul ( talk) 12:26, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because International Society for Stereology & Image Analysis is respectful, non-profit organization, established decades ago and should be introduced to Wikipedia readers. I do not have any conflict of interest. I am the member of the society, but not involved in the management in any way. Members are scientists from all over the world. I will be happy to further explain the issue or modify the article. -- Mimag343 ( talk) 00:14, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello Meatsgains
Thank you for notifying me of your proposed deletion of Alison Hartson. I have removed your proposal, made some edits to the article, and wrote an explanation for why we should keep the article in the article's talk page, as you've kindly recommended. I hope we may continue our dialogue in that space.
Best, User:Mattomynameo ( talk) 01:56, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello Meatsgains I have put the source thanks for reminding me. -- Hichem algerino ( talk) 16:09, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi Meatsgains, many thanks for fixing this article Alaa Talbi, you added an Orphan tag to it; I linked it to other wiki-articles. What should I do more ? Thanks in advance. Emnamizouni ( talk) 18:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello! I made a page called "OGLE-2016-BLG-1190L, but it's impossible to visit the article, since it always redirects to another page called " OGLE-2016-BLG-1190Lb". What do I do? I-CANT-THINK-OF-USERNAME! ( talk) 14:59, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
I do have citations, i just don’t know how to properly set them. Could you help me? Dancitofilm ( talk) 00:13, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Here are a few citations. http://variety.com/2015/film/news/jennette-mccurdy-virginia-gardner-little-bitches-1201661873/ https://www.elsiglodetorreon.com.mx/noticia/1290953.estrena-sin-bandera-video-de-sobre-mi-una-colaboracion-con-maluma.html http://archivo.eluniversal.com.mx/espectaculos/123403.html https://www.huffingtonpost.com/gregory-weinkauf/hollyshorts-film-festival_b_3774287.html
Can you help me add them? Dancitofilm ( talk) 00:16, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
I did read and did it like that and it appears like this “Empty citation (help)” , I’m new at this, any chance you might help me add them? Thank you so much Dancitofilm ( talk) 00:20, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Yes the variety article talks about Carrillo Producing Little Bitches, and the Hufftington about the release of Zero Hour at the festival Dancitofilm ( talk) 00:28, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
I have more Dancitofilm ( talk) 00:28, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
This is the direct quote from Variety ““Little Bitches” is currently shooting in Los Angeles with Nick Kreiss directing from his own script. Producers are Scott Aversano, Will Russell-Shapiro, Jorge Garcia, Diego Del Rio, Dom Genest, Dan Carrillo-Levy and Eugenio Villamar” Dancitofilm ( talk) 00:29, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Direct quote from the HUfftington post article “Opening night’s block of shorts showcased eight compelling films, kicking off with the new “Zero Hour” by director-producer Dan Carrillo Levy, an intense desert drama written by Guillermo Arriga (Babel), starring Camilla Belle and Jaime Camil. Also, look out! ” Dancitofilm ( talk) 00:30, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Here’s another big reference that I’m trying to add, would love if you could help
https://www.mexico.mx/en/articles/moxie-88-mexican-movie-producers-in-hollywood Dancitofilm ( talk) 00:36, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
I know cause of IMDB. Someone else just deleted it. I thought you added the support. Thanks Dancitofilm ( talk) 18:21, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The New Page Patroller's Barnstar | |
Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! Keep up the good work! — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 05:11, 21 November 2017 (UTC) |
Hello Meatsgains, I need some help. I have created an article about the C. F. E. BACH motif, which has no wiki data item ID, so I can not connect it to the Hungarian article. Could someone help me? Thanks: -- Gömb Adél ( talk) 08:44, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Just a heads up on Bimal Shah. I declined your A1 speedy deletion request because there was plenty of context. A1 is pretty specific in its requirements -- you might want to take a minute to review that.-- Fabrictramp | talk to me 03:28, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Barnum effect you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Power~enwiki --
Power~enwiki (
talk)
22:01, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Denomination effect you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Bungle --
Bungle (
talk)
20:21, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
The article
Barnum effect you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Barnum effect for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Power~enwiki --
Power~enwiki (
talk)
20:42, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Meatsgains. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for the positive encouragement on the page I created, Utility scam! I really appreciate it. -- 1440wordpower ( talk) 19:47, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Normalcy bias you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Farang Rak Tham --
Farang Rak Tham (
talk)
17:21, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Backlog update:
Outreach and Invitations:
{{subst:NPR invite}}
. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.New Year New Page Review Drive
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni ( talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
The article Duquesne Family Office has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not enough coverage in reliable independent sources to satisfy CORPDEPTH or GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
James (
talk/
contribs)
18:06, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
The article
Illusory truth effect you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Illusory truth effect for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Wugapodes --
Wugapodes (
talk)
23:02, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
The article
Normalcy bias you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Normalcy bias for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Farang Rak Tham --
Farang Rak Tham (
talk)
09:21, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Disposition effect you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Mike Christie --
Mike Christie (
talk)
17:41, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
The article
Denomination effect you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Denomination effect for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Bungle --
Bungle (
talk)
14:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
The article
Normalcy bias you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Normalcy bias for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Farang Rak Tham --
Farang Rak Tham (
talk)
06:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Automation bias you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Georgejdorner --
Georgejdorner (
talk)
06:41, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Jim O'Neill (investor) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
CookieMonster755 --
CookieMonster755 (
talk)
02:41, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
The article
Jim O'Neill (investor) you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Jim O'Neill (investor) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
CookieMonster755 --
CookieMonster755 (
talk)
03:41, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
The article
Automation bias you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Automation bias for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Georgejdorner --
Georgejdorner (
talk)
04:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!
We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!
The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.
Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:
NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni ( talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Jay Obernolte you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Premeditated Chaos --
Premeditated Chaos (
talk)
12:02, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Duquesne Family Office is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duquesne Family Office until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. James ( talk/ contribs) 13:52, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
The article
Jay Obernolte you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Jay Obernolte for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Premeditated Chaos --
Premeditated Chaos (
talk)
00:41, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
The article
Jay Obernolte you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Jay Obernolte for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Premeditated Chaos --
Premeditated Chaos (
talk)
17:21, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing my page, however, it got deleted. I just republished it in a much simpler format as I did get a chance to copy the old page bc it was instantly deleted. Could you take a look at it again, please? Koncurrentkat ( talk) 01:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Koncurrentkat ( talk) 13:39, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
This Article Babak Rahnama In-line citations needed, I Added Citations To Article Can You Remove This Tag?????? (In-line citations needed) With Respect Mohammad MohammadRajabloo2 ( talk) 02:24, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Thank you so much for answering ❤❤, I'll be sure to add new References soon. Thanks ❤❤❤❤❤ MohammadRajabloo2 ( talk) 09:39, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
You can read my comment at Talk:Slovakia national bandy team. Bandy Hoppsan ( talk) 22:38, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello Meatsgains. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sonny arguinzoni, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims importance/significance of the subject. Thank you. So Why 07:00, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Hallo,
why did you tagged my article aboud JackEL? What is the problem with it? Can you please give me some advice what to change.
with kind regards Jakabl — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakabl ( talk • contribs) 02:26, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
ok. Thanks for your criticism. the article is not finished now. I'm going to work on it the next days. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakabl ( talk • contribs) 02:36, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Isn't it a little bit odd that after you reviewed the article, it got speedied? Doesn't reviewing it pretty much mean that you made a judgment that it didn't meet any speedy deletion criteria? How then could someone else come along and overturn that judgment?
It would be like if someone removed the speedy tag and then someone else added it back. I thought CSD was only for uncontroversial cases, yet if your judgment differed from someone else's, that means there was a controversy. Smooth alligator ( talk) 19:02, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
A thanks for withdrawing the recent AfD nom for the 2017–18 Ahmad Shah Abdali 4-day Tournament. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 06:41, 19 October 2017 (UTC) |
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I'm MRD2014. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, M.A.C.A., and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
— MRD2014 Talk • Edits • Help! 02:02, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Illusory truth effect you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Wugapodes --
Wugapodes (
talk)
06:41, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
The article
Illusory truth effect you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Illusory truth effect for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Wugapodes --
Wugapodes (
talk)
08:21, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi Meatsgains, thanks for fighting linkrot. However, I just ran into an edit [1] where so many things went wrong that it is provoking my comment. In the above mentioned edit you added:
|title=Sony präsentiert E PZ 18–110mm F4 G OSS für Videografen - photoscala|first=About The Author Redaktion|last=photoscala|publisher=
In this example, you erroneously added the publisher (photoscala) to the |title=
parameter, but added an empty parameter |publisher=
and also added the publisher to the |last=
parameter, which is meant for the surname of the author (Vieten), not the publisher. As |first=
parameter you added "About The Author Redaktion", which does not make sense at all. This entry should have had the author's forename "Martin". An alternative to specifying the actual name of the author Martin Vieten, it would also have been possible to use the |author=
parameter for a string like "photoscala Redaktion". If the author is not mentioned in the article at all, but it is clear that it must have been a staff writer, we typically leave this HTML comment |author=<!-- Staff writer, no byline -->
in order to keep future editors from searching for the author name again.
On the cosmetical side, if an article is already using a consistent style for citations, we usually try to maintain this for new entries. In this case, all the older citations had their parameter names prefixed by a space before the pipe symbol (example: " |parameter=xyz"), which creates a more readable flow in narrow edit windows than omitting the space. Old parameter names |first=
and |last=
are fine in general, but the usage of the more modern |author-first=
and |author-last=
(with hyphen) is preferred in order to better distinguish them from |editor-first=
and |editor-last=
parameters.
I haven't checked if this the only example where things went wrong, but please keep in mind that the {{ cite}} templates create metadata and are also "harvested" by bots to fill external databases, so it is quite important that parameters don't contain incorrect data. So, please check the data you fill into citations and don't blindly rely on the tools, or the whole effort might be counter-productive... Actually, if you are not sure about some citation data, it is better to just skip the citation and leave it to another editor to fill the gap than inserting incorrect data.
Another suggestion to fight linkrot: Still accessible links should be check for being archived in the Wayback machine ( http://www.archive.org) and the archived links be added to our references as well.
Hope it helps. -- Matthiaspaul ( talk) 12:26, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because International Society for Stereology & Image Analysis is respectful, non-profit organization, established decades ago and should be introduced to Wikipedia readers. I do not have any conflict of interest. I am the member of the society, but not involved in the management in any way. Members are scientists from all over the world. I will be happy to further explain the issue or modify the article. -- Mimag343 ( talk) 00:14, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello Meatsgains
Thank you for notifying me of your proposed deletion of Alison Hartson. I have removed your proposal, made some edits to the article, and wrote an explanation for why we should keep the article in the article's talk page, as you've kindly recommended. I hope we may continue our dialogue in that space.
Best, User:Mattomynameo ( talk) 01:56, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello Meatsgains I have put the source thanks for reminding me. -- Hichem algerino ( talk) 16:09, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi Meatsgains, many thanks for fixing this article Alaa Talbi, you added an Orphan tag to it; I linked it to other wiki-articles. What should I do more ? Thanks in advance. Emnamizouni ( talk) 18:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello! I made a page called "OGLE-2016-BLG-1190L, but it's impossible to visit the article, since it always redirects to another page called " OGLE-2016-BLG-1190Lb". What do I do? I-CANT-THINK-OF-USERNAME! ( talk) 14:59, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
I do have citations, i just don’t know how to properly set them. Could you help me? Dancitofilm ( talk) 00:13, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Here are a few citations. http://variety.com/2015/film/news/jennette-mccurdy-virginia-gardner-little-bitches-1201661873/ https://www.elsiglodetorreon.com.mx/noticia/1290953.estrena-sin-bandera-video-de-sobre-mi-una-colaboracion-con-maluma.html http://archivo.eluniversal.com.mx/espectaculos/123403.html https://www.huffingtonpost.com/gregory-weinkauf/hollyshorts-film-festival_b_3774287.html
Can you help me add them? Dancitofilm ( talk) 00:16, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
I did read and did it like that and it appears like this “Empty citation (help)” , I’m new at this, any chance you might help me add them? Thank you so much Dancitofilm ( talk) 00:20, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Yes the variety article talks about Carrillo Producing Little Bitches, and the Hufftington about the release of Zero Hour at the festival Dancitofilm ( talk) 00:28, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
I have more Dancitofilm ( talk) 00:28, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
This is the direct quote from Variety ““Little Bitches” is currently shooting in Los Angeles with Nick Kreiss directing from his own script. Producers are Scott Aversano, Will Russell-Shapiro, Jorge Garcia, Diego Del Rio, Dom Genest, Dan Carrillo-Levy and Eugenio Villamar” Dancitofilm ( talk) 00:29, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Direct quote from the HUfftington post article “Opening night’s block of shorts showcased eight compelling films, kicking off with the new “Zero Hour” by director-producer Dan Carrillo Levy, an intense desert drama written by Guillermo Arriga (Babel), starring Camilla Belle and Jaime Camil. Also, look out! ” Dancitofilm ( talk) 00:30, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Here’s another big reference that I’m trying to add, would love if you could help
https://www.mexico.mx/en/articles/moxie-88-mexican-movie-producers-in-hollywood Dancitofilm ( talk) 00:36, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
I know cause of IMDB. Someone else just deleted it. I thought you added the support. Thanks Dancitofilm ( talk) 18:21, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The New Page Patroller's Barnstar | |
Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! Keep up the good work! — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 05:11, 21 November 2017 (UTC) |
Hello Meatsgains, I need some help. I have created an article about the C. F. E. BACH motif, which has no wiki data item ID, so I can not connect it to the Hungarian article. Could someone help me? Thanks: -- Gömb Adél ( talk) 08:44, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Just a heads up on Bimal Shah. I declined your A1 speedy deletion request because there was plenty of context. A1 is pretty specific in its requirements -- you might want to take a minute to review that.-- Fabrictramp | talk to me 03:28, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Barnum effect you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Power~enwiki --
Power~enwiki (
talk)
22:01, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Denomination effect you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Bungle --
Bungle (
talk)
20:21, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
The article
Barnum effect you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Barnum effect for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Power~enwiki --
Power~enwiki (
talk)
20:42, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Meatsgains. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for the positive encouragement on the page I created, Utility scam! I really appreciate it. -- 1440wordpower ( talk) 19:47, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Normalcy bias you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Farang Rak Tham --
Farang Rak Tham (
talk)
17:21, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Backlog update:
Outreach and Invitations:
{{subst:NPR invite}}
. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.New Year New Page Review Drive
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni ( talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
The article Duquesne Family Office has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not enough coverage in reliable independent sources to satisfy CORPDEPTH or GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
James (
talk/
contribs)
18:06, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
The article
Illusory truth effect you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Illusory truth effect for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Wugapodes --
Wugapodes (
talk)
23:02, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
The article
Normalcy bias you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Normalcy bias for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Farang Rak Tham --
Farang Rak Tham (
talk)
09:21, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Disposition effect you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Mike Christie --
Mike Christie (
talk)
17:41, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
The article
Denomination effect you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Denomination effect for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Bungle --
Bungle (
talk)
14:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
The article
Normalcy bias you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Normalcy bias for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Farang Rak Tham --
Farang Rak Tham (
talk)
06:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Automation bias you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Georgejdorner --
Georgejdorner (
talk)
06:41, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Jim O'Neill (investor) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
CookieMonster755 --
CookieMonster755 (
talk)
02:41, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
The article
Jim O'Neill (investor) you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Jim O'Neill (investor) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
CookieMonster755 --
CookieMonster755 (
talk)
03:41, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
The article
Automation bias you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Automation bias for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Georgejdorner --
Georgejdorner (
talk)
04:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!
We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!
The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.
Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:
NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni ( talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Jay Obernolte you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Premeditated Chaos --
Premeditated Chaos (
talk)
12:02, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Duquesne Family Office is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duquesne Family Office until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. James ( talk/ contribs) 13:52, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
The article
Jay Obernolte you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Jay Obernolte for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Premeditated Chaos --
Premeditated Chaos (
talk)
00:41, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
The article
Jay Obernolte you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Jay Obernolte for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Premeditated Chaos --
Premeditated Chaos (
talk)
17:21, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing my page, however, it got deleted. I just republished it in a much simpler format as I did get a chance to copy the old page bc it was instantly deleted. Could you take a look at it again, please? Koncurrentkat ( talk) 01:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Koncurrentkat ( talk) 13:39, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
This Article Babak Rahnama In-line citations needed, I Added Citations To Article Can You Remove This Tag?????? (In-line citations needed) With Respect Mohammad MohammadRajabloo2 ( talk) 02:24, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Thank you so much for answering ❤❤, I'll be sure to add new References soon. Thanks ❤❤❤❤❤ MohammadRajabloo2 ( talk) 09:39, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |