![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thought this might interest you, especially regarding your comments yesterday about rights issues. However, some potentially bad news. Amazon.co.uk has updated its status regarding the DVD from "This title will be released on June 28, 2016" to "Currently unavailable. We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock." Do you have a preorder with them, or did you order it somewhere else? I've emailed Illuminations Media to ask them what the situation is, so as soon as I hear back, I'll let you know. It's not a big issue for me, as the DVD is already available directly from their official site. However, from your perspective, they only ship within Europe (Brexit be damned, DVDs to sell!). So, worst case scenario, if you want, I'd be happy to buy two copies and send one on to you, as you'd likely be waiting a while for it to turn up anywhere else. But we'll see what happens. I'll be back in touch as soon as I know anything. Bertaut ( talk) 00:04, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Curiouser and curiouser! I haven't heard anything from Amazon regarding my order, which is still listed as pending. However, I did get this email back from Illuminations.
Hi Stephen, The reason it’s saying ‘currently unavailable’ is because we’ve had to pause it due to an error found with the labelling of the three discs :( So disc one is disc two etc etc. The plant are reprinting and it’ll be available again as soon as, once the trouble’s been sorted. It’s all very unfortunate. You are free to order from our website of course, but ultimately it won’t make any difference for the next few days. Would you like me to let you know specifically when we’ve got it back in? Very happy to. Sorry for the disappointment. Best, Louise
So that's strange. I guess we'll just wait and see what happens over the next few days. As a side note, I've only ever seen the 11 episode version as well. It's available on YouTube, but I got it on iOffer. A (slightly) better quality bootleg than YouTube's. But the blog is right about it being "awkwardly edited". The episodes end without natural climaxes and begin without natural beginnings, and, to make matters worse, the "cross over sections" between the three plays (from Henry VI to Edward IV and from Edward IV to Richard III) are both contained within the middle of episodes, so there's this weird mid-episode climax that completely throws the narrative trajectory off. Also, I don't know why, but for some strange reason, whilst the first 10 episodes are 50 minutes each, the last episode is only 20 minutes!! Really sloppy. But I guess at the time, they weren't thinking of such things as home video. Anyhow, we'll see what happens with the DVD. Any developments of interest I'll give you a shout. Bertaut ( talk) 22:09, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, but I know how to check and mark off Cyberbot II fixes. Check my edit history. As for there not being anything to update, I actually expanded a journal cite. -- Iryna Harpy ( talk) 02:06, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
Chasing after Cyberbot II is a big job. Your work speaks for itself. — cyberpower Chat:Online 13:54, 6 July 2016 (UTC) |
Network DVD is having a 50% off sale for one week: http://networkonair.com/ . As my friend who alerted me notes, "as usual the site is astonishingly slow at the moment, which usually happens for the first few days of their sales."
http://networkonair.com/features/2016/07/08/summer-sale/
Categories are at the top; the menus for genres appear when you hover over them.
(If I remember correctly, shipping is free or very minimal/reasonable to the U.S.)
-- Softlavender ( talk) 18:09, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Can you join us at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#TheLongTone. I agree that he needs to be disciplined and sanctioned. He called me and another editors "Sickos" during his AfD of the Riley Ann Sawyers article and got violently abusive to us after he lost the Sawyers AfD. Paul Benjamin Austin ( talk) 19:39, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
No need to call me an "ass" for reverting your edit. Your "the update was successful" summary didn't seem relevant to either of the changes you had made, although I guess you were referring to the bot's behavior. FYI, I despise Audacity and don't use the Userbox template that you removed. Some guy ( talk) 04:30, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Sorry it took forever, but I finally implemented your requested feature. InternetArchiveBot now only leaves a message if it doing more the source formatting corrections. This should still come in handy as InternetArchiveBot is waiting to make almost 200,000 new edits to pages. :p— cyberpower Chat:Online 14:30, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Many sources (such as history books) claim that MCA bought Paramount's pre-1950 sound feature film library in February 1958 (although they incorrectly label "pre-1950" as "pre-1948" even though Paramount films from 1948 to November 1949 are part of the MCA package). 71.95.50.94 ( talk) 16:47, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
There is an expression: "finger-trouble"....yeah, well, you just saw a demonstration of that! So, sorry! Huldra ( talk) 23:53, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Okay then. Here we go: User:Bertaut/sandbox5. How's that look? What I've done is fairly self-explanatory. Obviously, I've removed the cast lists from the 10 episode version and added them to the three episode version. I also removed the "directed by" credit from the ten episodes, and didn't bother adding it to the three episodes, as all three are credited to both directors, and the article already says who directed it for TV. Similarly, I didn't add a "content" section to the three episode version as the article already says where the splits are (although I did leave the content section for each of the ten episodes). I removed a couple of photos and left one for each of the three episodes, and I left the air dates for the ten episodes. Finally, I also limited the table of contents to 3 so as to prevent all thirteen episodes being listed. Feel free to tweak it as you see fit - I'll post it into the article once you give me the go-ahead. Bertaut ( talk) 01:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Marnette. I can't say I care if Til Eulenspiegel gets to edit his talkpage or not (and if I don't care, why should anybody?). It might as well be left open. But there's plenty of evidence for block evasion and trolling by him, most recently from the 71.246.148.152/20 range. Unfortunately he has access to large ranges, and they can't really be blocked. There was an ANI report recently, but I don't have the link. Just thought you might like to know. Bishonen | talk 03:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC).
@ Bishonen, MarnetteD, Adamfinmo, and Til Eulenspiegel: (smoke, fire .. ) Regarding this, I have reverted Adamfinmo (now as an IP) again, and have blocked both Adamfinmo and the IP. In the meantime, I also revoked talk-page access from Til Eulenspiegel, as they did find it necessary to be unnecessarily blunt towards Adamfinmo. Upon that, Til Eulenspiegel also found it necessary to make an IP edit to his talkpage (yet another IP to be blocked). Anyway, my take here is that Adamfinmo was unnecessarily trolling, or even trying to provoke Til Eulenspiegel (I will re-instate talkpage access at some point in the near future (in a week or so), the personal attacks were unnecessary but provoked). -- Dirk Beetstra T C 13:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
I'm cross-posting this to you and Holanthony.
refs added, Reflist talk added, refs changed to bare URLs, Reflist talk removed, another ref added, another ref added, Reflist talk re-added. And so on.
People generally don't use refs for diffs. It's more work—in adding the ref, adding the Reflist talk, and even in viewing the diff. There is no upside. I have no way of knowing whether you and Holanthony missed my refactoring (either in the page history or in its effect in the thread), or saw it and disagreed with it. Therefore I'm not going to do it again. But I disagree with the Reflist talk "fix" to the problem. It makes far more sense to convert the refs to bare URLs and forget the Reflist talk. ― Mandruss ☎ 22:15, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
If you have a better photo than the one you recently reverted, please put it in the infobox.. the current one is horrible. I may have been ill for two years, but I am not a newbie here. -- Leahtwosaints ( talk) 06:07, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Howdy! Thanks for jumping in as well on that death-date vandal a few minutes ago! Since you're here, I welcome your thoughts on how to handle this: I would love to leave a message for User:Mikewayne84 regarding a variety of issues on articles he has created and edited... but he has used his talk page to mirror his copy-editing-etc.-challenged article, Gerard Lima. I don't want to blank or otherwise mess with another user's talk page—or, at least, if I do, I do want to do it the "right" way (such as that might be). Your thoughts? Thanks in advance from a fellow textile-creation aficionada - Julietdeltalima (talk) 01:26, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
User:Mikewayne84 Hey I saw that this came up. I am not trying to commit any form of vandalism or ruin anything on here. I started creating the page for Gerard Lima and I just had really bad computer issues. My computer kept closing my window browser every time I went to save the article I was writing but I was not able to find it again when I got back on to re-edit or work on it. Gerard Lima this is the page I was finally able to create for this very talented filmmaker I have met and seen progressing in his career over the last few years. Again I apologize for any inconvenience I may have caused. —Preceding undated comment added 03:08, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello, ManetteD.
Could you explain this edit, please.
Best regards .
Bastien Sens-Méyé ( talk) 20:59, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Wow. Just...wow. So you and Sro23 and I and others are accused of cyber bullying (or cyber billing, as they said on my page on Commons), when they are the ones threatening legal action and violence. And constantly bringing up the D'Onofrio's wife thing; I let that go ages ago. I think they've resumed again under other IPs again today. *sigh* Still, I've now got my talk pages at Tardis Wikia, WikiVoyage and my Commons protected so they can't harass me there anymore. Though as I've said before, I find it amusing. All they have to do is ignore us and not respond. But they can't help themselves.
It's funny that they say that we have no life. Myself, I've started a WikiProject that now has dozens of members, written stubs for most of the NRHP sites in Florida, visited and photographed most of the NRHP sites in Florida and other places (over 20,000 photos uploaded to Commons, btw) and rated hundreds of articles. And that's just on Wikipedia. What has BSaK done? This is why what they say bothers me not a wit. I've been on the receiving end of bullying. I know what that is. I've been on the receiving end of a shotgun. I know what violence is. What we're doing, that ain't it. Anyway, maybe they'll just go off and edit on the Disney Wikia only. Which they could do to their hearts content, and not be bothered by us. But ironically, unlike the song, I don't think they can ever let it go. :) --‖ Ebyabe talk - Union of Opposites ‖ 17:14, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Hey MarnetteD,
You've stumbled into a pet peeve of mine. It actually makes things worse if you put a template in a thread title. If you do that, no one can follow the little grey "go to section" arrow in the edit summary. Try it in your page history on this thread; it won't work. It's actually much better to use square brackets. Sometimes when I see templates in a thread title at AN/ANI I change them, but it can be a Sisyphusian (sp?) task. Anyway, I doubt it's policy, and no one cares in this particular case because it's archived, but just FYI. -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 21:47, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello MarnetteD, I'm here to explain this edit which was recently reverted. I was attempting to fix the cite tweet errors by adding the date and used the content of the tweet as a title. If that is wrong, please tell me how I can fix it, because I have done the same on a number of other articles and would like to clean up my own mess if I made one. Thank you, Me, Myself & I (☮) ( talk) 23:40, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi! I thought you would like to know that /info/en/?search=Blake_Fitzpatrick was deleted and is currently under deletion review after an arguably unreliable Afd. Filmfan655321 ( talk) 12:16, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Ah, the wonders never cease. I've been doing some Freddie Fox article cleanup and research (and trying to verify his birthdate), when it came to my attention that he was suddenly plucked out of holiday three weeks ago to co-star as Romeo with Lily James in Kenneth Branagh's ongoing R&J production at the Garrick -- after not one but two Romeos were injured. Deets now in the lede of his article. So funny! Softlavender ( talk) 05:53, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, but I don't get it. Drmies ( talk) 00:41, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Just letting you know I removed your entry, since one was already there. It's Tikeem doing his usual thing by the way. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 18:43, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi Marnette, I noticed you've had a few interactions with the above editor (at Amadeus and Clockwork orange). I've just had to clean-up the Doctor Zhivago article after he edited it earlier today (OR and MOS violation). Anyway, I'm just giving you the heads up because I think we're going to have to keep an eye on him. I think the mistakes are more down to inexperience than anything else, but if you come across any more of his edits on articles you edit then it's a good idea to check them out. Betty Logan ( talk) 00:07, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Rest in peace Gene Wilder. Thanks for all the smiles and laughs. MarnetteD| Talk 19:45, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
You as well Jon Polito. So many wonderful performances on TV and film. You are one of the many reasons I can watch Miller's Crossing again and again. "I'm sick of the the high hat." MarnetteD| Talk 02:01, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for letting me know, Have a nice week.-- Jobas ( talk) 23:40, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
It's Vote (X). Just an FYI. -- Jayron 32 00:17, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Wiki Loves Women- Monthly Contest (September)! |
Hello, this is to notify you about a monthly article writing contest organized by Wikimedia User Group Nigeria in collaboration with Wiki Loves Women to increase the coverage of Nigerian women on Wikipedia! The theme for the month of September is Women in Entertainment. See the contest page here. Thank you. Delivered: 12:52, 17 September 2016 (UTC) |
I'm not sure why you reverted the bio on this public figure. All the information is correct and verifiable. There are 29 different references listed (new ones added today). Also, it adheres to the bios of similar public figures which include a ton of information (more than is listed here), and without references. Not sure why this one keeps getting targeted.-- Belloq69 ( talk) 04:35, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for updating the protection too, it comes with the territory, doesn't faze me in the least. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 17:00, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Illuminations Media are fast becoming my heroes. Check this out. I've never seen this version, as it's completely unavailable in any form. I've been looking for years. Even IOffer don't have any bootleg copies. Apart from one clip (the deposition scene, obviously) on YouTube, I've never seen any of it. Now, if only they'd make Alexander/Sher's Richard III available, I'd die happy...oh, and Warner/Cox's Titus...and Marowitz's The Shrew...and...okay, this could go on for a while... Bertaut ( talk) 01:52, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for helping me by reverting the unregistered user's unwarranted edits on my talk page. Garagepunk66 ( talk) 05:06, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Shiftyrye27 to MarnetteD greetings. Unfortunately I do not see the point in the reversal of my edit. It seems unhelpful to insert ambiguous text that is linked to specific pages. The current form of the statement is rather unclear and can be manifested much more plainly. Hoping that my message resolved this conflict, I have the honour to remain, your's deeply, Shiftyrye27. Shiftyrye27 ( talk) 17:59, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for cleaning up after 107.77.208.158 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS). That was an annoying one. It looks like you already encountered this editor earlier as 107.77.206.47 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS), which I guess means we're going to see it yet again under a different IP address. I sure hope I'm not the one to clean up after it. I think I'm on my fourth computer mouse since I installed Twinkle. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 21:35, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello MarnetteD,
My name is Zoe Wilson, the Assistant to the August Wilson Estate. I'm reaching out to inform you that the official title of Wilson's ten plays is the American Century Cycle. Wilson had a strong belief that his plays were for all Americans, not just those who live in Pittsburgh. In addition, not all ten plays take place in Pittsburgh. Naming the plays the Pittsburgh Cycle on Wikipedia is damaging Wilson's intention for his work. Theatre companies who are producing his work become confused when the Wiki page lists the incorrect title.
Thank you for your time, Zoe — Preceding unsigned comment added by Awestateassistant ( talk • contribs) 19:09, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
Hello71 3RR block review. Thank you. ⁓
Hello
71
20:05, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
That was Til Eulenspiegel complaining about being pinged. Typical language. Doug Weller talk 16:28, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
Good afternoon MarnetteD, Just to let you know that the previous version for Fantasia 2000 is wrong and unacceptable. Please let it be, Thank you. 76.66.146.48. 16:45, 1 November 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.66.146.48 ( talk)
Nah, you were fine! I already saw that he was going after me. Not sure what his/her deal is.... *shrugs* :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 20:26, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, would you please explain why you reverted my edit in Al-Muabbada? Thanks. Amr ibn Kulthoumعمرو بن كلثوم ( talk) 04:28, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Good morning MarnetteD, Just you let you know that your previous story for the sequel film, Fantasia 2000 has false summary. Please leave the correct one as it goes right. Rectify 54| Talk 13:55, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
I am sorry MarnetteD, I was asking politely and trying to help you. The sentence I made is suppose to be correct. I did not make disruptive edits to a few articles. Rectify 54| Talk 15:45, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Good morning MarnetteD, I am trying to listen to myself and rectifying a few appropriate article paragraphs. You did not use for Legaia 2: Duel Saga. Please, let me rectify the words they spelled wrong, Thank you. Rectify 54| Talk 15:26, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Please don't remove my question. I really want to know the answer (which I don't know yet). Am I the first one to notice the connection between Trump's name and Clinton's husband expertise in palying trumpet. HOTmag ( talk) 18:54, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the info Bish. The fact that they work like the Carousel slide projector that I grew up with adds to their delights. MarnetteD| Talk 23:15, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Good grief a RFC-mountain a molehill much |
---|
|
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thought this might interest you, especially regarding your comments yesterday about rights issues. However, some potentially bad news. Amazon.co.uk has updated its status regarding the DVD from "This title will be released on June 28, 2016" to "Currently unavailable. We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock." Do you have a preorder with them, or did you order it somewhere else? I've emailed Illuminations Media to ask them what the situation is, so as soon as I hear back, I'll let you know. It's not a big issue for me, as the DVD is already available directly from their official site. However, from your perspective, they only ship within Europe (Brexit be damned, DVDs to sell!). So, worst case scenario, if you want, I'd be happy to buy two copies and send one on to you, as you'd likely be waiting a while for it to turn up anywhere else. But we'll see what happens. I'll be back in touch as soon as I know anything. Bertaut ( talk) 00:04, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Curiouser and curiouser! I haven't heard anything from Amazon regarding my order, which is still listed as pending. However, I did get this email back from Illuminations.
Hi Stephen, The reason it’s saying ‘currently unavailable’ is because we’ve had to pause it due to an error found with the labelling of the three discs :( So disc one is disc two etc etc. The plant are reprinting and it’ll be available again as soon as, once the trouble’s been sorted. It’s all very unfortunate. You are free to order from our website of course, but ultimately it won’t make any difference for the next few days. Would you like me to let you know specifically when we’ve got it back in? Very happy to. Sorry for the disappointment. Best, Louise
So that's strange. I guess we'll just wait and see what happens over the next few days. As a side note, I've only ever seen the 11 episode version as well. It's available on YouTube, but I got it on iOffer. A (slightly) better quality bootleg than YouTube's. But the blog is right about it being "awkwardly edited". The episodes end without natural climaxes and begin without natural beginnings, and, to make matters worse, the "cross over sections" between the three plays (from Henry VI to Edward IV and from Edward IV to Richard III) are both contained within the middle of episodes, so there's this weird mid-episode climax that completely throws the narrative trajectory off. Also, I don't know why, but for some strange reason, whilst the first 10 episodes are 50 minutes each, the last episode is only 20 minutes!! Really sloppy. But I guess at the time, they weren't thinking of such things as home video. Anyhow, we'll see what happens with the DVD. Any developments of interest I'll give you a shout. Bertaut ( talk) 22:09, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, but I know how to check and mark off Cyberbot II fixes. Check my edit history. As for there not being anything to update, I actually expanded a journal cite. -- Iryna Harpy ( talk) 02:06, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
Chasing after Cyberbot II is a big job. Your work speaks for itself. — cyberpower Chat:Online 13:54, 6 July 2016 (UTC) |
Network DVD is having a 50% off sale for one week: http://networkonair.com/ . As my friend who alerted me notes, "as usual the site is astonishingly slow at the moment, which usually happens for the first few days of their sales."
http://networkonair.com/features/2016/07/08/summer-sale/
Categories are at the top; the menus for genres appear when you hover over them.
(If I remember correctly, shipping is free or very minimal/reasonable to the U.S.)
-- Softlavender ( talk) 18:09, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Can you join us at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#TheLongTone. I agree that he needs to be disciplined and sanctioned. He called me and another editors "Sickos" during his AfD of the Riley Ann Sawyers article and got violently abusive to us after he lost the Sawyers AfD. Paul Benjamin Austin ( talk) 19:39, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
No need to call me an "ass" for reverting your edit. Your "the update was successful" summary didn't seem relevant to either of the changes you had made, although I guess you were referring to the bot's behavior. FYI, I despise Audacity and don't use the Userbox template that you removed. Some guy ( talk) 04:30, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Sorry it took forever, but I finally implemented your requested feature. InternetArchiveBot now only leaves a message if it doing more the source formatting corrections. This should still come in handy as InternetArchiveBot is waiting to make almost 200,000 new edits to pages. :p— cyberpower Chat:Online 14:30, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Many sources (such as history books) claim that MCA bought Paramount's pre-1950 sound feature film library in February 1958 (although they incorrectly label "pre-1950" as "pre-1948" even though Paramount films from 1948 to November 1949 are part of the MCA package). 71.95.50.94 ( talk) 16:47, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
There is an expression: "finger-trouble"....yeah, well, you just saw a demonstration of that! So, sorry! Huldra ( talk) 23:53, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Okay then. Here we go: User:Bertaut/sandbox5. How's that look? What I've done is fairly self-explanatory. Obviously, I've removed the cast lists from the 10 episode version and added them to the three episode version. I also removed the "directed by" credit from the ten episodes, and didn't bother adding it to the three episodes, as all three are credited to both directors, and the article already says who directed it for TV. Similarly, I didn't add a "content" section to the three episode version as the article already says where the splits are (although I did leave the content section for each of the ten episodes). I removed a couple of photos and left one for each of the three episodes, and I left the air dates for the ten episodes. Finally, I also limited the table of contents to 3 so as to prevent all thirteen episodes being listed. Feel free to tweak it as you see fit - I'll post it into the article once you give me the go-ahead. Bertaut ( talk) 01:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Marnette. I can't say I care if Til Eulenspiegel gets to edit his talkpage or not (and if I don't care, why should anybody?). It might as well be left open. But there's plenty of evidence for block evasion and trolling by him, most recently from the 71.246.148.152/20 range. Unfortunately he has access to large ranges, and they can't really be blocked. There was an ANI report recently, but I don't have the link. Just thought you might like to know. Bishonen | talk 03:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC).
@ Bishonen, MarnetteD, Adamfinmo, and Til Eulenspiegel: (smoke, fire .. ) Regarding this, I have reverted Adamfinmo (now as an IP) again, and have blocked both Adamfinmo and the IP. In the meantime, I also revoked talk-page access from Til Eulenspiegel, as they did find it necessary to be unnecessarily blunt towards Adamfinmo. Upon that, Til Eulenspiegel also found it necessary to make an IP edit to his talkpage (yet another IP to be blocked). Anyway, my take here is that Adamfinmo was unnecessarily trolling, or even trying to provoke Til Eulenspiegel (I will re-instate talkpage access at some point in the near future (in a week or so), the personal attacks were unnecessary but provoked). -- Dirk Beetstra T C 13:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
I'm cross-posting this to you and Holanthony.
refs added, Reflist talk added, refs changed to bare URLs, Reflist talk removed, another ref added, another ref added, Reflist talk re-added. And so on.
People generally don't use refs for diffs. It's more work—in adding the ref, adding the Reflist talk, and even in viewing the diff. There is no upside. I have no way of knowing whether you and Holanthony missed my refactoring (either in the page history or in its effect in the thread), or saw it and disagreed with it. Therefore I'm not going to do it again. But I disagree with the Reflist talk "fix" to the problem. It makes far more sense to convert the refs to bare URLs and forget the Reflist talk. ― Mandruss ☎ 22:15, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
If you have a better photo than the one you recently reverted, please put it in the infobox.. the current one is horrible. I may have been ill for two years, but I am not a newbie here. -- Leahtwosaints ( talk) 06:07, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Howdy! Thanks for jumping in as well on that death-date vandal a few minutes ago! Since you're here, I welcome your thoughts on how to handle this: I would love to leave a message for User:Mikewayne84 regarding a variety of issues on articles he has created and edited... but he has used his talk page to mirror his copy-editing-etc.-challenged article, Gerard Lima. I don't want to blank or otherwise mess with another user's talk page—or, at least, if I do, I do want to do it the "right" way (such as that might be). Your thoughts? Thanks in advance from a fellow textile-creation aficionada - Julietdeltalima (talk) 01:26, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
User:Mikewayne84 Hey I saw that this came up. I am not trying to commit any form of vandalism or ruin anything on here. I started creating the page for Gerard Lima and I just had really bad computer issues. My computer kept closing my window browser every time I went to save the article I was writing but I was not able to find it again when I got back on to re-edit or work on it. Gerard Lima this is the page I was finally able to create for this very talented filmmaker I have met and seen progressing in his career over the last few years. Again I apologize for any inconvenience I may have caused. —Preceding undated comment added 03:08, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello, ManetteD.
Could you explain this edit, please.
Best regards .
Bastien Sens-Méyé ( talk) 20:59, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Wow. Just...wow. So you and Sro23 and I and others are accused of cyber bullying (or cyber billing, as they said on my page on Commons), when they are the ones threatening legal action and violence. And constantly bringing up the D'Onofrio's wife thing; I let that go ages ago. I think they've resumed again under other IPs again today. *sigh* Still, I've now got my talk pages at Tardis Wikia, WikiVoyage and my Commons protected so they can't harass me there anymore. Though as I've said before, I find it amusing. All they have to do is ignore us and not respond. But they can't help themselves.
It's funny that they say that we have no life. Myself, I've started a WikiProject that now has dozens of members, written stubs for most of the NRHP sites in Florida, visited and photographed most of the NRHP sites in Florida and other places (over 20,000 photos uploaded to Commons, btw) and rated hundreds of articles. And that's just on Wikipedia. What has BSaK done? This is why what they say bothers me not a wit. I've been on the receiving end of bullying. I know what that is. I've been on the receiving end of a shotgun. I know what violence is. What we're doing, that ain't it. Anyway, maybe they'll just go off and edit on the Disney Wikia only. Which they could do to their hearts content, and not be bothered by us. But ironically, unlike the song, I don't think they can ever let it go. :) --‖ Ebyabe talk - Union of Opposites ‖ 17:14, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Hey MarnetteD,
You've stumbled into a pet peeve of mine. It actually makes things worse if you put a template in a thread title. If you do that, no one can follow the little grey "go to section" arrow in the edit summary. Try it in your page history on this thread; it won't work. It's actually much better to use square brackets. Sometimes when I see templates in a thread title at AN/ANI I change them, but it can be a Sisyphusian (sp?) task. Anyway, I doubt it's policy, and no one cares in this particular case because it's archived, but just FYI. -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 21:47, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello MarnetteD, I'm here to explain this edit which was recently reverted. I was attempting to fix the cite tweet errors by adding the date and used the content of the tweet as a title. If that is wrong, please tell me how I can fix it, because I have done the same on a number of other articles and would like to clean up my own mess if I made one. Thank you, Me, Myself & I (☮) ( talk) 23:40, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi! I thought you would like to know that /info/en/?search=Blake_Fitzpatrick was deleted and is currently under deletion review after an arguably unreliable Afd. Filmfan655321 ( talk) 12:16, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Ah, the wonders never cease. I've been doing some Freddie Fox article cleanup and research (and trying to verify his birthdate), when it came to my attention that he was suddenly plucked out of holiday three weeks ago to co-star as Romeo with Lily James in Kenneth Branagh's ongoing R&J production at the Garrick -- after not one but two Romeos were injured. Deets now in the lede of his article. So funny! Softlavender ( talk) 05:53, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, but I don't get it. Drmies ( talk) 00:41, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Just letting you know I removed your entry, since one was already there. It's Tikeem doing his usual thing by the way. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 18:43, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi Marnette, I noticed you've had a few interactions with the above editor (at Amadeus and Clockwork orange). I've just had to clean-up the Doctor Zhivago article after he edited it earlier today (OR and MOS violation). Anyway, I'm just giving you the heads up because I think we're going to have to keep an eye on him. I think the mistakes are more down to inexperience than anything else, but if you come across any more of his edits on articles you edit then it's a good idea to check them out. Betty Logan ( talk) 00:07, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Rest in peace Gene Wilder. Thanks for all the smiles and laughs. MarnetteD| Talk 19:45, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
You as well Jon Polito. So many wonderful performances on TV and film. You are one of the many reasons I can watch Miller's Crossing again and again. "I'm sick of the the high hat." MarnetteD| Talk 02:01, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for letting me know, Have a nice week.-- Jobas ( talk) 23:40, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
It's Vote (X). Just an FYI. -- Jayron 32 00:17, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Wiki Loves Women- Monthly Contest (September)! |
Hello, this is to notify you about a monthly article writing contest organized by Wikimedia User Group Nigeria in collaboration with Wiki Loves Women to increase the coverage of Nigerian women on Wikipedia! The theme for the month of September is Women in Entertainment. See the contest page here. Thank you. Delivered: 12:52, 17 September 2016 (UTC) |
I'm not sure why you reverted the bio on this public figure. All the information is correct and verifiable. There are 29 different references listed (new ones added today). Also, it adheres to the bios of similar public figures which include a ton of information (more than is listed here), and without references. Not sure why this one keeps getting targeted.-- Belloq69 ( talk) 04:35, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for updating the protection too, it comes with the territory, doesn't faze me in the least. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 17:00, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Illuminations Media are fast becoming my heroes. Check this out. I've never seen this version, as it's completely unavailable in any form. I've been looking for years. Even IOffer don't have any bootleg copies. Apart from one clip (the deposition scene, obviously) on YouTube, I've never seen any of it. Now, if only they'd make Alexander/Sher's Richard III available, I'd die happy...oh, and Warner/Cox's Titus...and Marowitz's The Shrew...and...okay, this could go on for a while... Bertaut ( talk) 01:52, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for helping me by reverting the unregistered user's unwarranted edits on my talk page. Garagepunk66 ( talk) 05:06, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Shiftyrye27 to MarnetteD greetings. Unfortunately I do not see the point in the reversal of my edit. It seems unhelpful to insert ambiguous text that is linked to specific pages. The current form of the statement is rather unclear and can be manifested much more plainly. Hoping that my message resolved this conflict, I have the honour to remain, your's deeply, Shiftyrye27. Shiftyrye27 ( talk) 17:59, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for cleaning up after 107.77.208.158 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS). That was an annoying one. It looks like you already encountered this editor earlier as 107.77.206.47 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS), which I guess means we're going to see it yet again under a different IP address. I sure hope I'm not the one to clean up after it. I think I'm on my fourth computer mouse since I installed Twinkle. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 21:35, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello MarnetteD,
My name is Zoe Wilson, the Assistant to the August Wilson Estate. I'm reaching out to inform you that the official title of Wilson's ten plays is the American Century Cycle. Wilson had a strong belief that his plays were for all Americans, not just those who live in Pittsburgh. In addition, not all ten plays take place in Pittsburgh. Naming the plays the Pittsburgh Cycle on Wikipedia is damaging Wilson's intention for his work. Theatre companies who are producing his work become confused when the Wiki page lists the incorrect title.
Thank you for your time, Zoe — Preceding unsigned comment added by Awestateassistant ( talk • contribs) 19:09, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
Hello71 3RR block review. Thank you. ⁓
Hello
71
20:05, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
That was Til Eulenspiegel complaining about being pinged. Typical language. Doug Weller talk 16:28, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
Good afternoon MarnetteD, Just to let you know that the previous version for Fantasia 2000 is wrong and unacceptable. Please let it be, Thank you. 76.66.146.48. 16:45, 1 November 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.66.146.48 ( talk)
Nah, you were fine! I already saw that he was going after me. Not sure what his/her deal is.... *shrugs* :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 20:26, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, would you please explain why you reverted my edit in Al-Muabbada? Thanks. Amr ibn Kulthoumعمرو بن كلثوم ( talk) 04:28, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Good morning MarnetteD, Just you let you know that your previous story for the sequel film, Fantasia 2000 has false summary. Please leave the correct one as it goes right. Rectify 54| Talk 13:55, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
I am sorry MarnetteD, I was asking politely and trying to help you. The sentence I made is suppose to be correct. I did not make disruptive edits to a few articles. Rectify 54| Talk 15:45, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Good morning MarnetteD, I am trying to listen to myself and rectifying a few appropriate article paragraphs. You did not use for Legaia 2: Duel Saga. Please, let me rectify the words they spelled wrong, Thank you. Rectify 54| Talk 15:26, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Please don't remove my question. I really want to know the answer (which I don't know yet). Am I the first one to notice the connection between Trump's name and Clinton's husband expertise in palying trumpet. HOTmag ( talk) 18:54, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the info Bish. The fact that they work like the Carousel slide projector that I grew up with adds to their delights. MarnetteD| Talk 23:15, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Good grief a RFC-mountain a molehill much |
---|
|