Thanks for the help. Actually I was gonna ask you to delete the message anyway cuz a friend of mine just told me it was false.

Sorry for the trouble.

~Garfield Turtle Anime~ ( talk) 20:29, 1 May 2009 (UTC) Hajiru reply

Thanks for reverting the userpage vandalism. Much appreciated! (I don't count Huggle as editing per se since it's just mindless clicking of a dark box - reverting via your watchlist is far more flattering. That, and you've done it more than once.) Recognizance ( talk) 00:30, 8 May 2009 (UTC) reply

On May 3, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article List of number-one singles of 2008 (Japan), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass ( talk) 09:12, 3 May 2009 (UTC) reply

You read my mind, I was thinking of taking a look at that one, since I'm a moderate anime fan. Right now my schedule for this week is going to be EXTREMELY hectic, due to finals and exams and papers coming up, and I have two other GA reviews to do, so I'll definitely do the article. I just won't have any time to breathe until Thursday, and I may be able to take a look at your nomination on Saturday or so. Maybe even earlier if I can find some free time. How does that sound? :) CarpetCrawler ^{message me} 05:34, 4 May 2009 (UTC) reply

OK, I might as well put the GA Review template by the nomination while I'm here for a quick break. :) CarpetCrawler ^{message me} 19:55, 4 May 2009 (UTC) reply

OK, I'm starting the review right now. :) CarpetCrawler ^{message me} 05:48, 9 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Article is on hold, please view the talkpage for details. :) CarpetCrawler ^{message me} 06:01, 9 May 2009 (UTC) reply

OK, I'll take a look tomorrow, I'm about to go to bed. :) CarpetCrawler ^{message me} 07:18, 9 May 2009 (UTC) reply

OK, I've responded. :) CarpetCrawler ^{message me} 20:48, 9 May 2009 (UTC) reply

OK, I passed the article. Please view the talkpage for details. Thanks, and keep up the good work! CarpetCrawler ^{message me} 05:40, 10 May 2009 (UTC) reply

On May 7, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Share the World/We Are!, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Awadewit ( talk) 17:51, 7 May 2009 (UTC) reply

On May 8, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Best of Soul, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Royal broil 04:03, 8 May 2009 (UTC) reply

On May 8, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article List of number-one singles of 2009 (Japan), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass ( talk) 11:07, 8 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Question: Why did you remove the article about Himekas Asu e no Kizuna single? I though it was nicely done but now it's just gone! Why?!

Megami no Hikari —Preceding unsigned comment added by Megami no Hikari ( talk • contribs) 21:35, 11 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Regardless of if you think it was "nicely done" the page fails WP:MUSIC. So I redirected it to Himeka. 月 (Moon) と 暁 (Sunrise) 21:40, 11 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Excuse me but most Koda Kumi pages are done the same way... ~MNH~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Megami no Hikari ( talk • contribs) 09:41, 12 May 2009 (UTC) reply

I'm not editing most of Kumi Koda's pages, so bring it up isn't going to change anything. Anyway if you read WP:MUSIC, it said something along the lines that a song that has charted is notable so just wait until it gets released and I'll undo the redirect. And sign your post by using ~~~~. 月 (Moon) と 暁 (Sunrise) 10:21, 12 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Every page a person shall make is their's right?? I just don't want anybody to mess "mine" up and/or delete them.-- Das Ansehnlisch ( talk) 12:37, 27 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Read the nutshell tag

This page in a nutshell: You do not own articles (nor templates and other features of Wikipedia). If you create or edit an article, know that others will edit it, and within reason you should not prevent them from doing so.

月 (Moon) と 暁 (Sunrise) 12:50, 27 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Tell me the exact reason(s) why the page is a canidate for speedy deletion and I will (try) to do my best to fix them. I really wanna keep editing!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Das Ansehnlisch ( talk • contribs) 12:45, 27 May 2009 (UTC) reply

It's very clear that the article fails WP:NSONGS. In order for the article to stay, you would have to prove that the song charted on a music any music chart, other than iTunes. Read WP:GOODCHARTS, if "Glass of Water" charted on any of those then it'll have a chance of sticking around. 月 (Moon) と 暁 (Sunrise) 12:50, 27 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Did you use a tool to place Japanese Symbols into the article List of Case Closed episodes? If not, could you perhaps do the same great editing you did to the other season titles as well? Thank you. DragonZero ( talk) 02:23, 3 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Thanks but I didn't use a tool, just my keyboard. Uh, sure I'll do for you. All them right? MS (Talk| Contributions) 02:27, 3 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Yes if you can, thank you. DragonZero ( talk) 04:09, 3 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi. In the subject you are referring to I have an edit war with Legolas, who has reverted an edit more than 3 times, when there is a consensus against it. I firmly think that he is a protegé here, but should be blocked. He insists on maintaining the song "My Love", that obviously doesn't exits, when all of the other users want to remove it. He should be warned about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Saviour09 ( talk • contribs) 12:49, 3 June 2009 (UTC) ( edit conflict)::You haven't shown that there is consensus against it. Legolas; however, shown that he gained consensus for his edits. Leave the track list alone or else I'll report you. MS (Talk| Contributions) 13:06, 3 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi. A consensus regarding this had been reached days back at User talk:Kww. Thsi user and its sockpuppet IP is continuously reverting inspite of that when the information in concern has been reported by a RS like Billboard and consensus was reached that it should be kept as a note. I will not revert the page but I guess this kind of vandalism needs to stop. PS I loved your work on the Japan FLs. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 12:53, 3 June 2009 (UTC) reply

( edit conflict)::Yeah, I see that you've achieved consensus back in May. I reverted his edits pointing to the discussion, so if he reverts he'll be blocked. I'll keep a eye on the page for now so don't worry about. Thanks for your compliment. MS (Talk| Contributions) 13:06, 3 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Reverted again. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 13:03, 3 June 2009 (UTC) reply

I'm going to revert and report him. MS (Talk| Contributions) 13:13, 3 June 2009 (UTC) reply

This is far more serious than reverting a suspected sock puppet, this is reverting posts made by a confirmed, persistent and prolific sock puppet whose posts regarding myself and other editors have had to be oversighted and dealt with by Wikipedia beureautcrats on more than one occasion and has resulted in complaints filed with the state police in my home state. A WP:SSI isn't necessary, a post has already been made to WP:AN/I because the content the sock puppet posted on one of the talk pages consists of definitive prove of the account being a sock and it is being dealt with. This is precisely what I was advised to do the last time this editor showed up here and proceeded to post my personal information on his privately operated website - revert posts on sight and immediately post a notice atn WP:AN/I. This is a bit beyond the routine sock master behavior, the editor in question has been banned for life from Wikipedia because of off-WP harassment and outing of editors here on his websites. Wildhartlivie ( talk) 04:22, 4 June 2009 (UTC) reply

I am asking for help- she continues to revert cited and accurate content ThePizzaMakingCaveman ( talk) 05:16, 4 June 2009 (UTC) reply

I just wanted to let you know: the user was blocked as a sock. Wildhartlivie ( talk) 08:11, 4 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Your request for deletion of this file could not be processed, as it is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion on Commons if you still wish it to be deleted. Stifle ( talk) 15:33, 4 June 2009 (UTC) reply

This applies equally to File:Yui Sunflower.PNG. Stifle ( talk) 15:34, 4 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Can you tell me how to nominate the articles for deletion on Commons? Tanks for the heads up. MS (Talk| Contributions) 15:38, 4 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi, MS. I like the work I generally see you doing on the various JPop articles. Let's discuss and get consensus on handling Again (Yui single) on the pertinent talk page before deleting/blanking/redirecting, okay? TJRC ( talk) 17:35, 4 June 2009 (UTC) reply

It's nice that you want to achieve consensus about "Again" but WP:NSONGS aka WP:MUSIC is very clear. If the article fails it has to be redirected to the parent article. MS (Talk| Contributions) 17:39, 4 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Yes, let's discuss whether those assumptions are correct. TJRC ( talk) 17:41, 4 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Thank you for uploading File:BoA and Sean Garrett.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Σ xplicit 19:39, 4 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Hey.  :) Just an FYI: for statements that are most likely true but don't have sources (re: Shinee's recent #1), it may be better just to add a {{fact}} to such a statement rather than removing it completely. Of course, if something is just rumoured or else completely false, you should remove it, but in cases like these, all it needs is a source, right?

If someone is going to add something to a article they have to prove what they add. I know about the {{fact}} tag already but it's up to them to prove the statement is true not another user. MS (Talk| Contributions) 18:43, 5 June 2009 (UTC) reply

(I totally forgot to sign my earlier statement. Sorry.) Granted, that's true, but for short statements that need sources, the fact tag would be just fine. That way, someone (like me) can go find a source. SKS ( talk) 18:51, 5 June 2009 (UTC) reply

I'm a new user, and I just created pages for the bands Outrage and Ms. Adventures, and am going to do one for The Truth. These were albums I found at second hand stores, and am using the album inserts and lyric books to provide the information for the articles. I plan to scan and email these materials for verification, but I'd also like feedback and editing on my articles so they'll be up to Wikipedia standards. Thank you! Wikimaniac8317 ( talk) 23:04, 7 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. I'll be glad to help you with the articles. But be careful when you are creating the articles because after you submit it to the main space they are no longer "your articles". See WP:OWN for further information. MS (Talk| Contributions) 01:22, 8 June 2009 (UTC) reply

I do not see how it was needed, billboard is extremly reliable. Hey Boys and Girls (Welcome to the Show…) ° 06:13, 8 June 2009 (UTC) reply

What do you mean? No one ever said Billboard was never reliable. Reliability and nobility is two difference things. The Cherrytree Sessions has to chart in order for it to have its own article, if it hasn't charted then it should be merged into Lady Gaga's article or whatever article it would be best to merge into. And how is there a dispute? It's not like there is an argument or an edit war going on about it. MS (Talk| Contributions) 11:22, 8 June 2009 (UTC) reply

No point. Sockpuppetry reverted the edit again. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 12:44, 8 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi, I know you haven't been working on the record charts lists as much anymore, but could you comment at Talk:List of number-one Billboard Top Latin Albums of 1999? It could be influential on many record charting lists. Thanks, Dabomb87 ( talk) 03:32, 9 June 2009 (UTC) reply

A persistent hater from this IP; 124.104.18.247 is persistenly pasting false facts in David Archuleta's "Music Influence" page biased against Regine Velasquez. I kept on deleting his/her entry but keeps on putting it back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LUO7AN ( talk • contribs) 16:13, 11 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Can you (maybe with LUO's help) give me a list of all the IPs this vandal has used? If we're to do a rangeblock, we need to know the whole range. Daniel Case ( talk) 02:47, 12 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Alright, this is going to take a little time to work out the extent of the rangeblock. I'll have to ask a checkuser to see if there are any legit users within the range (and it may be larger than that). I don't want to block the entire Philippines, if that's what would happen, this casually.

Please tell any legitimate administrator that many IP addresses have been interchanged. I haven't edited any article in this Wikipedia site and yet they are saying that I have edited all Regine Velasquez and David Archuleta pages. It is so weird. I don't even check their pages. That editor may have a new IP again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.104.26.207 ( talk) 06:10, 12 June 2009 (UTC) reply

I am so sorry! I did it with intentions though. Reason is because Yukiko Okada's article does not resemble in anyway shape or form a Fan Site. Take a look at Selena's article, sure it may have more words but it has the same media content; Selena's article is not considered a fan page but yet Yukiko's is? Is this a racial thing?