This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
It's me Valkyrie Red. I remember those good times we had a while back, and I would like to inform that I am a changed man, though I don't intend on staying with Wikipedia for much longer.
Well, the reason I contact you is that I want to understand something. You always seemed to be against me during our arguments, and I even suspect that you abused your powers on me, though you had plenty of support to get through this without repercussions.
Nonetheless, I have decided to forgive you for our past nonsense. I only ask in return for an apology. After that, you shant hear from me again.-- Valkyrie Red ( talk) 00:48, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
...that you may wish to be aware of. [1] Best, Rob ROBERTMFROMLI TALK/ CNTRB 03:09, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
In wake of the latest plagiarism/copyright uproar on ANI, User:SandyGeorgia has suggested that we do something that can be publicized in the Signpost. I'm collecting thoughts at User talk:Moonriddengirl/Copyright. Yours would be most welcome! -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:29, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi !
Just a feedback regarding your rant, it was much needed. You also may want to take a look at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents/Plagiarism and copyright concerns on the main page. The discussion of plagiarism there is much worse (imho it has gone completely overboard), it is particularly disturbing that many editors don't distinguish between plagiarism and copyvio at all and worse they apparently intend to apply the approach of universities/schools towards plagiarism to WP articles, which is completely inappropriate.
regards, -- Kmhkmh ( talk) 11:11, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
hi - this was deleted by you a while ago and want to make you aware that i recently stumbled across it and wanted to create a better version
Diginerd84 ( talk) 19:58, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Do you have time to review a rewrite at Talk:Marcelline Jayakody/Temp? Diversity of review is important in close paraphrasing issues, and I tagged the article. See the bottom of his talk page here for some examples from the original and note the bottom here. Another contributor has been helping him, so perhaps it's okay now, but I'd really like a second set of eyes on it. :) It's at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 October 25. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:16, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
I don't find your syntax bad at all! If I can find any constructive comments to make on the draft, I shall make them: however, you know my positions on "plagiarism", so I shall try not to bore you with a rehash of those. Physchim62 (talk) 19:31, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
In some situations where I've used {{ copyvio-histpurge}}, the URL that was being plagiarised was itself linking to a copyright violation (eg. scanlation aggregator sites). I feel that including the specific URL that is being plagiarised would be counterproductive in such circumstances, especially if the infringing history revisions include the URL. (as in "Download this manga here!") -- Malkinann ( talk) 22:45, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
WP:DENY MLauba ( Talk) 16:45, 13 November 2010 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
? Dylan Flaherty ( talk) 00:45, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
ClarificationMLauba, I just read WP:DENY, and it turned out to be an essay that was about vandalism, specifically excluding harassment. At risk of being overly sensitive, I'm concerned that you might be inadvertently suggesting that I'm a vandal. Would you please consider changing the label on your collapse section to something more appropriate? Dylan Flaherty ( talk) 19:10, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
|
Hi MLauba! Thanks for your note on the interaction ban. As I am not an admin, I can do little about it if it happens. Would you be willing to assist me in enforcing the ban? I can keep an eye out, and will let you know of any violations I see. Thanks again. Ham tech person 18:14, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Hallo M.Lauba,
I did as you asked, and posted a reply on my talk page. Thanks. Malke 2010 ( talk) 20:15, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello MLauba, you seem to have inadvertently posted the same question to multiple candidates in the ArbCom elections. The general questions, which are asked of all candidates, are here and were open to discussion and alteration by the community until the opening of nominations. Voters are welcome to ask an individual question of each specific question, but mass-posting isn't fair on the other voters, so I've removed your question for now. Please take a minute to read over the election page and the questions page for background and guidelines. Thanks, and sorry for the inconvenience, Skomorokh 13:49, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
I have removed all but one instance of your question about paraphrasing as the rules do not allow mass posting the same question to all candidates. Feel free to ask one specific question customized to each candidate. Questions must be 75 words or less. Thank you. Jehochman Talk 15:30, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi. There's a rewrite at the CP from Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 October 31 on which I'd like a second opinion. Would you mind? I've already weighed in at the talk page. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:45, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
If you have spare time, could you pitch in at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 November 7? There are a couple of outstanding issues. :) I'm going to try to get a dent on today's listings, but have to leave in about 45 minutes and will be gone all day. (please read that in a properly whiny tone.) Meanwhile, I am distracted by a multiple article issue which I'm checking for need of a CCI. Copyright work. Never ending. :) -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:04, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
The above article was deleted 3 times, twice by yourself for copyright problems, it has been recreated and I can't check the website you cited in you deletion edit summary as it appears to be under construction. Could you check to see if it still has copyright problems thanks. Mo ainm ~Talk 11:01, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Boujour, je te contacte pour une purge de l'article Toubou people. La partie "Society" a été directement recopiée depuis "Encyclopaedia of the muslim world" p.32 (a partir du second paragraphe) et p.33. Voir ici Cordialement-- Kimdime ( talk) 04:22, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
Können sie Deutsch lesen? Ich weiß, sie sind in der lage. Mein Deutsch ist nicht so gut. Werden sie kümmern sich um diese? Bitte? -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:17, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi. There's a question about a paraphrase on my talk page, here, with which I'd be grateful for a second opinion. Any chance you can provide one? -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:25, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Thank you very much for getting the shot of the Privatair HQ! WhisperToMe ( talk) 16:36, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Sorry to bother you, the same user you reverted and blocked here is at it again here and here. I've had a few "discussions" with him on Moonriddengirl's page and I simply cannot talk logically with him anymore. Please note the multiple IP addresses on her page as well in the "Warning" section of her talk page. CanadianLinuxUser ( talk) 19:52, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi. :) If you have a chance, would you mind addressing Communities That Care at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 December 9? It's not up until tomorrow, but I think we may not need to wait for it. I'd rather fresh eyes make the call. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:59, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Another one that could benefit from your eyes is at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/Older consolidated--specifically, the (currently) second listing down on Glücksgas Stadium. A contributor thinks it may be a machine translation, and since the source is likely to be German I thought perhaps you could help out. More info at the listing. :) -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:20, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
MLauba - Thanks for assessing Winter of Terror for me. It's appreciated. Anything in return I can or could do for you please let me know on my talkpage. Adamdaley ( talk) 00:05, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
A while ago PhanuelB sent me an email in which you were mentioned. If you are interested you can see both the text of the email and my response to it at User talk:PhanuelB#Response to email request for help. JamesBWatson ( talk) 11:48, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
While the IP's comments were probably not in the correct forum, I feel both that your reversion of his civil comments was unwarranted, and that your warning to him on his talk page borders on unfair bullying. I think that there are more constructive ways to engage other editors, and I respectfully request that you try these before taking drastic steps like reverting talk posts and making threats. LedRush ( talk) 17:20, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
I would appreciate it if you could endeavor to be more civil with regards to the edits and discussions involving the Murder of Meredith Kercher article. I am trying to assume good faith, but it seems as if you are trying to threaten anyone with a dissenting view point so that the current group of editors can continue to mold the article as they wish. Your bullying of editors and your disruptive attempts to end discussions only foster more ill will in an article that already has high tensions and strong feelings. Things have remained relatively civil on the board despite some temper flares, but your actions serve to inflame the situation. LedRush ( talk) 01:24, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Just to make you aware that I've requested more information about permissions from the website. This was granted by Victor and permission has been sent to OTRS volunteers.
Biggleswiki ( talk) 08:56, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
I attempted to creat this page when I was made its new webmaster but didn't yet have an email that reflected ownership. The contact parallels closely the website content because that's the logical place to start. I'd like to have this page activated again so I can edit it. The email that I can be contacted at as being a representative of the copyright owner is (redacted). Thank you. Canonpayneus ( talk) 04:39, 9 February 2011 (UTC).
I responded at [ [2]] Ruigeroeland ( talk) 10:33, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
In the light of recent edits example, example 2, example 3, some level of page protection might be useful. pablo 13:37, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Can you explain a bit about your block of User:ChrisStefan? I'm sure it's justified, it's only that I can't see any sign of any warnings, or any discussion at noticeboards, so I'm not sure what the history to the block is. I'm curious as I was going to try and help him out with understanding why his page has been deleted and what he can do about it, and I wanted to know what I'm dealing with! Thanks.-- Korruski Talk 14:29, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
It's me Valkyrie Red. I remember those good times we had a while back, and I would like to inform that I am a changed man, though I don't intend on staying with Wikipedia for much longer.
Well, the reason I contact you is that I want to understand something. You always seemed to be against me during our arguments, and I even suspect that you abused your powers on me, though you had plenty of support to get through this without repercussions.
Nonetheless, I have decided to forgive you for our past nonsense. I only ask in return for an apology. After that, you shant hear from me again.-- Valkyrie Red ( talk) 00:48, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
...that you may wish to be aware of. [1] Best, Rob ROBERTMFROMLI TALK/ CNTRB 03:09, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
In wake of the latest plagiarism/copyright uproar on ANI, User:SandyGeorgia has suggested that we do something that can be publicized in the Signpost. I'm collecting thoughts at User talk:Moonriddengirl/Copyright. Yours would be most welcome! -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:29, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi !
Just a feedback regarding your rant, it was much needed. You also may want to take a look at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents/Plagiarism and copyright concerns on the main page. The discussion of plagiarism there is much worse (imho it has gone completely overboard), it is particularly disturbing that many editors don't distinguish between plagiarism and copyvio at all and worse they apparently intend to apply the approach of universities/schools towards plagiarism to WP articles, which is completely inappropriate.
regards, -- Kmhkmh ( talk) 11:11, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
hi - this was deleted by you a while ago and want to make you aware that i recently stumbled across it and wanted to create a better version
Diginerd84 ( talk) 19:58, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Do you have time to review a rewrite at Talk:Marcelline Jayakody/Temp? Diversity of review is important in close paraphrasing issues, and I tagged the article. See the bottom of his talk page here for some examples from the original and note the bottom here. Another contributor has been helping him, so perhaps it's okay now, but I'd really like a second set of eyes on it. :) It's at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 October 25. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:16, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
I don't find your syntax bad at all! If I can find any constructive comments to make on the draft, I shall make them: however, you know my positions on "plagiarism", so I shall try not to bore you with a rehash of those. Physchim62 (talk) 19:31, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
In some situations where I've used {{ copyvio-histpurge}}, the URL that was being plagiarised was itself linking to a copyright violation (eg. scanlation aggregator sites). I feel that including the specific URL that is being plagiarised would be counterproductive in such circumstances, especially if the infringing history revisions include the URL. (as in "Download this manga here!") -- Malkinann ( talk) 22:45, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
WP:DENY MLauba ( Talk) 16:45, 13 November 2010 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
? Dylan Flaherty ( talk) 00:45, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
ClarificationMLauba, I just read WP:DENY, and it turned out to be an essay that was about vandalism, specifically excluding harassment. At risk of being overly sensitive, I'm concerned that you might be inadvertently suggesting that I'm a vandal. Would you please consider changing the label on your collapse section to something more appropriate? Dylan Flaherty ( talk) 19:10, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
|
Hi MLauba! Thanks for your note on the interaction ban. As I am not an admin, I can do little about it if it happens. Would you be willing to assist me in enforcing the ban? I can keep an eye out, and will let you know of any violations I see. Thanks again. Ham tech person 18:14, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Hallo M.Lauba,
I did as you asked, and posted a reply on my talk page. Thanks. Malke 2010 ( talk) 20:15, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello MLauba, you seem to have inadvertently posted the same question to multiple candidates in the ArbCom elections. The general questions, which are asked of all candidates, are here and were open to discussion and alteration by the community until the opening of nominations. Voters are welcome to ask an individual question of each specific question, but mass-posting isn't fair on the other voters, so I've removed your question for now. Please take a minute to read over the election page and the questions page for background and guidelines. Thanks, and sorry for the inconvenience, Skomorokh 13:49, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
I have removed all but one instance of your question about paraphrasing as the rules do not allow mass posting the same question to all candidates. Feel free to ask one specific question customized to each candidate. Questions must be 75 words or less. Thank you. Jehochman Talk 15:30, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi. There's a rewrite at the CP from Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 October 31 on which I'd like a second opinion. Would you mind? I've already weighed in at the talk page. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:45, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
If you have spare time, could you pitch in at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 November 7? There are a couple of outstanding issues. :) I'm going to try to get a dent on today's listings, but have to leave in about 45 minutes and will be gone all day. (please read that in a properly whiny tone.) Meanwhile, I am distracted by a multiple article issue which I'm checking for need of a CCI. Copyright work. Never ending. :) -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:04, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
The above article was deleted 3 times, twice by yourself for copyright problems, it has been recreated and I can't check the website you cited in you deletion edit summary as it appears to be under construction. Could you check to see if it still has copyright problems thanks. Mo ainm ~Talk 11:01, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Boujour, je te contacte pour une purge de l'article Toubou people. La partie "Society" a été directement recopiée depuis "Encyclopaedia of the muslim world" p.32 (a partir du second paragraphe) et p.33. Voir ici Cordialement-- Kimdime ( talk) 04:22, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
Können sie Deutsch lesen? Ich weiß, sie sind in der lage. Mein Deutsch ist nicht so gut. Werden sie kümmern sich um diese? Bitte? -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:17, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi. There's a question about a paraphrase on my talk page, here, with which I'd be grateful for a second opinion. Any chance you can provide one? -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:25, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Thank you very much for getting the shot of the Privatair HQ! WhisperToMe ( talk) 16:36, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Sorry to bother you, the same user you reverted and blocked here is at it again here and here. I've had a few "discussions" with him on Moonriddengirl's page and I simply cannot talk logically with him anymore. Please note the multiple IP addresses on her page as well in the "Warning" section of her talk page. CanadianLinuxUser ( talk) 19:52, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi. :) If you have a chance, would you mind addressing Communities That Care at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 December 9? It's not up until tomorrow, but I think we may not need to wait for it. I'd rather fresh eyes make the call. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:59, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Another one that could benefit from your eyes is at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/Older consolidated--specifically, the (currently) second listing down on Glücksgas Stadium. A contributor thinks it may be a machine translation, and since the source is likely to be German I thought perhaps you could help out. More info at the listing. :) -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:20, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
MLauba - Thanks for assessing Winter of Terror for me. It's appreciated. Anything in return I can or could do for you please let me know on my talkpage. Adamdaley ( talk) 00:05, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
A while ago PhanuelB sent me an email in which you were mentioned. If you are interested you can see both the text of the email and my response to it at User talk:PhanuelB#Response to email request for help. JamesBWatson ( talk) 11:48, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
While the IP's comments were probably not in the correct forum, I feel both that your reversion of his civil comments was unwarranted, and that your warning to him on his talk page borders on unfair bullying. I think that there are more constructive ways to engage other editors, and I respectfully request that you try these before taking drastic steps like reverting talk posts and making threats. LedRush ( talk) 17:20, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
I would appreciate it if you could endeavor to be more civil with regards to the edits and discussions involving the Murder of Meredith Kercher article. I am trying to assume good faith, but it seems as if you are trying to threaten anyone with a dissenting view point so that the current group of editors can continue to mold the article as they wish. Your bullying of editors and your disruptive attempts to end discussions only foster more ill will in an article that already has high tensions and strong feelings. Things have remained relatively civil on the board despite some temper flares, but your actions serve to inflame the situation. LedRush ( talk) 01:24, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Just to make you aware that I've requested more information about permissions from the website. This was granted by Victor and permission has been sent to OTRS volunteers.
Biggleswiki ( talk) 08:56, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
I attempted to creat this page when I was made its new webmaster but didn't yet have an email that reflected ownership. The contact parallels closely the website content because that's the logical place to start. I'd like to have this page activated again so I can edit it. The email that I can be contacted at as being a representative of the copyright owner is (redacted). Thank you. Canonpayneus ( talk) 04:39, 9 February 2011 (UTC).
I responded at [ [2]] Ruigeroeland ( talk) 10:33, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
In the light of recent edits example, example 2, example 3, some level of page protection might be useful. pablo 13:37, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Can you explain a bit about your block of User:ChrisStefan? I'm sure it's justified, it's only that I can't see any sign of any warnings, or any discussion at noticeboards, so I'm not sure what the history to the block is. I'm curious as I was going to try and help him out with understanding why his page has been deleted and what he can do about it, and I wanted to know what I'm dealing with! Thanks.-- Korruski Talk 14:29, 9 February 2011 (UTC)