This is M.parvage's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
no archives yet ( create) |
Dear Concern, I hope you are doing well, most of the information here in this article is not right and it is vandalizing the reputation of this page. Regards Ucbassetmanagement ( talk) 09:46, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Suzanne Bernert is a verified cast member with news article and IMDB...what more you need ?? https://www.outlookindia.com/art-entertainment/suzanne-bernert-on-shooting-barun-sobti-arshad-warsi-s-asur-2-ott-is-more-like-shooting-a-movie-no-stress-of-day-to-day-telecast-news-293417/amp 103.174.159.191 ( talk) 05:54, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi. I'm writing about your comments at the articles for deletion discussion entry for Alim Industries.
In general, on Wikipedia, we try to keep things civil and not level personal attacks at other editors. If your goal was to discredit my comments, I suggest this was neither a polite nor effective way to do it. The goal is to reach WP:CONSENSUS, not to win arguments.
I apologize if I offended you by suggesting that you consider WP:BEFORE. Before doing so I also noted your nomination of Khulna Shipyard which appears to be the subject of even more in-depth coverage (I may get to that later). I tried to keep my comments polite, and your responses were disproportionate to anything I did.
If there's something else you have to say to me, I suggest you say it here. Otherwise, I hope you can reflect on this for the future. Oblivy ( talk) 10:40, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
The source you added [2] clearly says "The acclaimed Hindi-language crime thriller web series, will premier on 1st June." "Mythology, mystery, thrill with dash of horror" are some elements used in series not the Genre. Sid95Q ( talk) 11:30, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or
synthesis into articles, you may be
blocked from editing.
OhNoitsJamie
Talk 04:23, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Abdul Monem Limited, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 10:12, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
I believe the first page you created was Draft:Sharif Zahir, about a business executive. It was speedily deleted on 18 February 2023 as unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company or person. A month later a second draft was moved to Sharif Zahar by an Articles for Creation reviewer. It was nominated for deletion and deleted on 21 May. The article on Zahir's company, Ananta Group, was nominated for deletion and deleted on 3 June. When it was recreated, it was speedily deleted on 6 June.
Behavioral guideline Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point cautions, if someone nominates one of your favorite articles for deletion, against reflexively nominating another article for deletion for the same reason. But that's what you did, nominating eight companies and two real estate projects in Bangladesh for deletion between 10 and 14 June (as well as proposing deletion of two additional companies in Bangladesh). You aren't wrong that many articles need to be deleted, but you have been too hasty and failed to first determine whether the articles could be improved. ( Khulna Shipyard, for example).
Somewhere, I don't remember where, there's a guideline or essay about not flooding AfD with nominations. I think it's particularly about not nominating lots of one editor's articles at the same time, but the principle also applies to not overwhelming any deletion sorting category. A limited number of volunteers participate in these discussions, and it's courteous to spread out nominations so that everyone has time to do their own research (particularly when it needs to be done in Bengali as well as English) and give each topic due consideration. -- Worldbruce ( talk) 16:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Courtesy pings: (
Alivardi—
Aszx5000—
bonadea—
Carpimaps—
CastJared—
Curb Safe Charmer—
Eastmain—
HighKing—
JML1148—
Oaktree b)
Worldbruce (
talk) 16:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
(
Oblivy—
ParadaJulio—
Pharaoh of the Wizards—
Phil Bridger—
Red-tailed hawk—
Scope creep—
SportingFlyer—
Timothy—
Vinegarymass911—
আফতাবুজ্জামান)
Worldbruce (
talk) 16:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
There is something odd about seeing someone who has had an account for 4 months, and made 359 edits, claiming that someone who has had an account for 17 years old, and made 1,594 edits, is "not familiar" with Wikipedia, and does "not know how to contribute". JBW ( talk) 19:03, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, M.parvage!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Hitro
talk 09:23, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
|
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Vinegarymass911 ( talk) 12:08, 23 June 2023 (UTC)-- 10:16, Saturday, June 24, 2023 ( UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
-- 10:18, Saturday, June 24, 2023 ( UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Real estate in Bangladesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gulshan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:09, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Please post your views here. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:37, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
I know you have already been warned about promotional editing, but both some of your talk page messages and some of your article edits suggest that you may not fully grasp what that means. A Wikipedia article should never contain language such as "Shwapno provides an extensive assortment of products and services, aiming to meet the diverse requirements of customers". That is marketing language, pure and simple. If you continue to post stuff such as that you are likely be blocked from editing before long. Please think about it, and be careful. JBW ( talk) 15:06, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Real estate in Bangladesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Founder.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello M.parvage. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Abass Ibrahim, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. BangJan1999 22:50, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello M.parvage. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Aatish Bhalaik, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. BangJan1999 22:50, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Please do not re-add speedy deletion tags. Once they have been removed, use other methods of deletion such as proposed deletion or articles for deletion. Thank you. BangJan1999 22:53, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
I have no idea what you were doing here, but please don't do it again. Black Kite (talk) 11:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Narutolovehinata5 ( talk · contributions) 10:02, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
The page IDB Bhaban has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 10:23, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --
Tamzin
cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 10:26, 12 July 2023 (UTC)M.parvage ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I wrote an article on IDB bhaban yesterday night. My intention was to work on this topic to improve the article as it is a high rise building in Bangladesh. I believe that it was my wrong to publish content before finishing. I should write it at my sandbox. But as you saying about my promotional writing warning, I would like to request you to review that, it was about my writing regarding neutrality not for promotion related. I also encourage you to see my edits. I am trying to fix the promotional writing in Wikipedia articles. Again I want to say that I will work for new articles in my sandbox. The activity I did for IDB will never happen again. Thanks @ Tamzin:.-- PARVAGE talk! 11:19, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
There are several reasons why unblocking you would be unlikely to benefit the project. However, even if we just consider the issue of promotional editing, which Tamzin gave as the reason for the block, you have unambiguously been editing for promotional purposes, and nothing you have said indicates that you are unlikely to do so again. See also comments below concerning the nature of your editing. JBW ( talk) 19:09, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our
guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
at the end of
your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:
-- Blablubbs ( talk) 05:55, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
M.parvage ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I want to be completely transparent and honest with you - I have never engaged in any paid editing on this platform. I understand that my previous edit may have appeared promotional, but I can assure you it was not paid for. Also, I have never operated any other accounts or didn't perform any edits in the past except this account. I sincerely request the administrators reconsider the block placed on my account, and I assure you that from this point onward, I will refrain from any behavior that may raise concerns. If I make any future edits, I will fully accept any consequences that come my way. -- PARVAGE talk! 04:30, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Even without seeing the information sent to the paid editing queue, I have seen evidence which persuades me beyond any reasonable doubt that you have been editing for pay. JBW ( talk) 08:49, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
M.parvage ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Hello JBW: I find myself in a difficult situation as I am unable to prove that I have not engaged in any paid activities. I am also uncertain about the appropriate things to do in the next phase of this process.
However, I acknowledge that my previous activities appeared to be conflicts of interest and accept responsibility for that. At this point, I assure you that I am fully committed to having my future activities monitored closely, and I am willing to accept any consequences that may arise from my actions. Apart from these, I have no further comments or explanations to say. -- PARVAGE talk! 10:44, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
There is no pathway forward until you acknowledge that you are a paid editor- which I have found for myself without even asking anyone for it. 331dot ( talk) 08:24, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
M.parvage ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I apologize for my previous actions. I acknowledge that my involvement with Ananta Group and related activities was financially motivated in a passive way. I now pledge to refrain from engaging in such matters and particularly tasks of this nature in the future. I kindly request the administrators to take this into consideration. -- PARVAGE talk! 10:25, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla ( talk) 12:12, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
As a result of my previous actions for Conflict of interest, I have been blocked and now realize how important it is to follow Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. Although I have little experience, I am eager to learn and contribute to the community in a positive way.
As a blocked contributor who has requested unblocking, my curiosity has led me to wonder how long it takes to accept or decline unblock requests. I am aware that Wikipedia administrators are volunteers with their own commitments, and their availability might affect the processing time. However, I am curious to know more about the general timeframe for reviewing unblock requests. If any experienced editor or administrator could kindly shed some light on this matter, I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you.-- PARVAGE talk! 07:05, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello, M.parvage. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Ghulam Sumdany Don, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 16:06, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
The page Draft:Ghulam Sumdany Don has been deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 02:52, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
M.parvage ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I accept my fault and I made a huge mistake in Wikipedia, where I have included PR articles as sources and also added write-ups related to the real estate industry where I work. However, I should refrain from doing this since I work in this industry as well as Ananta group. I also raised deletion requests for a few pages intentionally. The punishment I received was necessary. However, I would like to ask once again for my unblocking. Moreover, I assure you that I won't do anything like that in the future. -- PARVAGE talk! 8:10 am, 6 March 2024, Wednesday (12 days ago) (UTC−5)
Accept reason:
Per discussion. Please heed WP:PAID as required. Welcome back. -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 19:17, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Noting @ Blablubbs: block log entry. "(uw-upeblock) taking over block per Ticket:2023071510002208," which of course I cannot see. Unsure of the ins and outs, so leaving the ticket untranscluded and assuming it needs a check user(?) -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 19:36, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
For the past 1 hour or so I've spent time on your case. I gotta say it was fun reading all the discussions and checking some of your actions. Especially tagging the Wikipedia's founder's user page for deletion, had me going.[no pun intended] I hope you've learned from your mistakes and will contribute to this project out of volunteer zeals instead of personal gain. As a friendly advice, please refrain from using AI chatbots while editing (articles, as well as discussions). I noticed and could tell you generated a lot of your responses in this very talk page and other noticeboard discussions with AI bots, further evident by your Google BARD screenshot. Note that AI tools can/should be used only to fine-tune the text you've written, but they can't be used solely as they tend to generate made-up jargon at times and incoherent/twisted facts that you might not intend.
With hindsight, I hope realize that you could've avoided being blocked by simply being honest and declaring your COIs. Nonetheless, I welcome you back and hope to see heartfelt contributions from you. Regards. X ( talk) 22:34, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
This is M.parvage's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
no archives yet ( create) |
Dear Concern, I hope you are doing well, most of the information here in this article is not right and it is vandalizing the reputation of this page. Regards Ucbassetmanagement ( talk) 09:46, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Suzanne Bernert is a verified cast member with news article and IMDB...what more you need ?? https://www.outlookindia.com/art-entertainment/suzanne-bernert-on-shooting-barun-sobti-arshad-warsi-s-asur-2-ott-is-more-like-shooting-a-movie-no-stress-of-day-to-day-telecast-news-293417/amp 103.174.159.191 ( talk) 05:54, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi. I'm writing about your comments at the articles for deletion discussion entry for Alim Industries.
In general, on Wikipedia, we try to keep things civil and not level personal attacks at other editors. If your goal was to discredit my comments, I suggest this was neither a polite nor effective way to do it. The goal is to reach WP:CONSENSUS, not to win arguments.
I apologize if I offended you by suggesting that you consider WP:BEFORE. Before doing so I also noted your nomination of Khulna Shipyard which appears to be the subject of even more in-depth coverage (I may get to that later). I tried to keep my comments polite, and your responses were disproportionate to anything I did.
If there's something else you have to say to me, I suggest you say it here. Otherwise, I hope you can reflect on this for the future. Oblivy ( talk) 10:40, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
The source you added [2] clearly says "The acclaimed Hindi-language crime thriller web series, will premier on 1st June." "Mythology, mystery, thrill with dash of horror" are some elements used in series not the Genre. Sid95Q ( talk) 11:30, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or
synthesis into articles, you may be
blocked from editing.
OhNoitsJamie
Talk 04:23, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Abdul Monem Limited, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 10:12, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
I believe the first page you created was Draft:Sharif Zahir, about a business executive. It was speedily deleted on 18 February 2023 as unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company or person. A month later a second draft was moved to Sharif Zahar by an Articles for Creation reviewer. It was nominated for deletion and deleted on 21 May. The article on Zahir's company, Ananta Group, was nominated for deletion and deleted on 3 June. When it was recreated, it was speedily deleted on 6 June.
Behavioral guideline Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point cautions, if someone nominates one of your favorite articles for deletion, against reflexively nominating another article for deletion for the same reason. But that's what you did, nominating eight companies and two real estate projects in Bangladesh for deletion between 10 and 14 June (as well as proposing deletion of two additional companies in Bangladesh). You aren't wrong that many articles need to be deleted, but you have been too hasty and failed to first determine whether the articles could be improved. ( Khulna Shipyard, for example).
Somewhere, I don't remember where, there's a guideline or essay about not flooding AfD with nominations. I think it's particularly about not nominating lots of one editor's articles at the same time, but the principle also applies to not overwhelming any deletion sorting category. A limited number of volunteers participate in these discussions, and it's courteous to spread out nominations so that everyone has time to do their own research (particularly when it needs to be done in Bengali as well as English) and give each topic due consideration. -- Worldbruce ( talk) 16:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Courtesy pings: (
Alivardi—
Aszx5000—
bonadea—
Carpimaps—
CastJared—
Curb Safe Charmer—
Eastmain—
HighKing—
JML1148—
Oaktree b)
Worldbruce (
talk) 16:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
(
Oblivy—
ParadaJulio—
Pharaoh of the Wizards—
Phil Bridger—
Red-tailed hawk—
Scope creep—
SportingFlyer—
Timothy—
Vinegarymass911—
আফতাবুজ্জামান)
Worldbruce (
talk) 16:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
There is something odd about seeing someone who has had an account for 4 months, and made 359 edits, claiming that someone who has had an account for 17 years old, and made 1,594 edits, is "not familiar" with Wikipedia, and does "not know how to contribute". JBW ( talk) 19:03, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, M.parvage!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Hitro
talk 09:23, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
|
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Vinegarymass911 ( talk) 12:08, 23 June 2023 (UTC)-- 10:16, Saturday, June 24, 2023 ( UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
-- 10:18, Saturday, June 24, 2023 ( UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Real estate in Bangladesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gulshan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:09, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Please post your views here. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:37, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
I know you have already been warned about promotional editing, but both some of your talk page messages and some of your article edits suggest that you may not fully grasp what that means. A Wikipedia article should never contain language such as "Shwapno provides an extensive assortment of products and services, aiming to meet the diverse requirements of customers". That is marketing language, pure and simple. If you continue to post stuff such as that you are likely be blocked from editing before long. Please think about it, and be careful. JBW ( talk) 15:06, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Real estate in Bangladesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Founder.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello M.parvage. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Abass Ibrahim, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. BangJan1999 22:50, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello M.parvage. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Aatish Bhalaik, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. BangJan1999 22:50, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Please do not re-add speedy deletion tags. Once they have been removed, use other methods of deletion such as proposed deletion or articles for deletion. Thank you. BangJan1999 22:53, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
I have no idea what you were doing here, but please don't do it again. Black Kite (talk) 11:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Narutolovehinata5 ( talk · contributions) 10:02, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
The page IDB Bhaban has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 10:23, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --
Tamzin
cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 10:26, 12 July 2023 (UTC)M.parvage ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I wrote an article on IDB bhaban yesterday night. My intention was to work on this topic to improve the article as it is a high rise building in Bangladesh. I believe that it was my wrong to publish content before finishing. I should write it at my sandbox. But as you saying about my promotional writing warning, I would like to request you to review that, it was about my writing regarding neutrality not for promotion related. I also encourage you to see my edits. I am trying to fix the promotional writing in Wikipedia articles. Again I want to say that I will work for new articles in my sandbox. The activity I did for IDB will never happen again. Thanks @ Tamzin:.-- PARVAGE talk! 11:19, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
There are several reasons why unblocking you would be unlikely to benefit the project. However, even if we just consider the issue of promotional editing, which Tamzin gave as the reason for the block, you have unambiguously been editing for promotional purposes, and nothing you have said indicates that you are unlikely to do so again. See also comments below concerning the nature of your editing. JBW ( talk) 19:09, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our
guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
at the end of
your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:
-- Blablubbs ( talk) 05:55, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
M.parvage ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I want to be completely transparent and honest with you - I have never engaged in any paid editing on this platform. I understand that my previous edit may have appeared promotional, but I can assure you it was not paid for. Also, I have never operated any other accounts or didn't perform any edits in the past except this account. I sincerely request the administrators reconsider the block placed on my account, and I assure you that from this point onward, I will refrain from any behavior that may raise concerns. If I make any future edits, I will fully accept any consequences that come my way. -- PARVAGE talk! 04:30, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Even without seeing the information sent to the paid editing queue, I have seen evidence which persuades me beyond any reasonable doubt that you have been editing for pay. JBW ( talk) 08:49, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
M.parvage ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Hello JBW: I find myself in a difficult situation as I am unable to prove that I have not engaged in any paid activities. I am also uncertain about the appropriate things to do in the next phase of this process.
However, I acknowledge that my previous activities appeared to be conflicts of interest and accept responsibility for that. At this point, I assure you that I am fully committed to having my future activities monitored closely, and I am willing to accept any consequences that may arise from my actions. Apart from these, I have no further comments or explanations to say. -- PARVAGE talk! 10:44, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
There is no pathway forward until you acknowledge that you are a paid editor- which I have found for myself without even asking anyone for it. 331dot ( talk) 08:24, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
M.parvage ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I apologize for my previous actions. I acknowledge that my involvement with Ananta Group and related activities was financially motivated in a passive way. I now pledge to refrain from engaging in such matters and particularly tasks of this nature in the future. I kindly request the administrators to take this into consideration. -- PARVAGE talk! 10:25, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla ( talk) 12:12, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
As a result of my previous actions for Conflict of interest, I have been blocked and now realize how important it is to follow Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. Although I have little experience, I am eager to learn and contribute to the community in a positive way.
As a blocked contributor who has requested unblocking, my curiosity has led me to wonder how long it takes to accept or decline unblock requests. I am aware that Wikipedia administrators are volunteers with their own commitments, and their availability might affect the processing time. However, I am curious to know more about the general timeframe for reviewing unblock requests. If any experienced editor or administrator could kindly shed some light on this matter, I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you.-- PARVAGE talk! 07:05, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello, M.parvage. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Ghulam Sumdany Don, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 16:06, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
The page Draft:Ghulam Sumdany Don has been deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 02:52, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
M.parvage ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I accept my fault and I made a huge mistake in Wikipedia, where I have included PR articles as sources and also added write-ups related to the real estate industry where I work. However, I should refrain from doing this since I work in this industry as well as Ananta group. I also raised deletion requests for a few pages intentionally. The punishment I received was necessary. However, I would like to ask once again for my unblocking. Moreover, I assure you that I won't do anything like that in the future. -- PARVAGE talk! 8:10 am, 6 March 2024, Wednesday (12 days ago) (UTC−5)
Accept reason:
Per discussion. Please heed WP:PAID as required. Welcome back. -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 19:17, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Noting @ Blablubbs: block log entry. "(uw-upeblock) taking over block per Ticket:2023071510002208," which of course I cannot see. Unsure of the ins and outs, so leaving the ticket untranscluded and assuming it needs a check user(?) -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 19:36, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
For the past 1 hour or so I've spent time on your case. I gotta say it was fun reading all the discussions and checking some of your actions. Especially tagging the Wikipedia's founder's user page for deletion, had me going.[no pun intended] I hope you've learned from your mistakes and will contribute to this project out of volunteer zeals instead of personal gain. As a friendly advice, please refrain from using AI chatbots while editing (articles, as well as discussions). I noticed and could tell you generated a lot of your responses in this very talk page and other noticeboard discussions with AI bots, further evident by your Google BARD screenshot. Note that AI tools can/should be used only to fine-tune the text you've written, but they can't be used solely as they tend to generate made-up jargon at times and incoherent/twisted facts that you might not intend.
With hindsight, I hope realize that you could've avoided being blocked by simply being honest and declaring your COIs. Nonetheless, I welcome you back and hope to see heartfelt contributions from you. Regards. X ( talk) 22:34, 6 April 2024 (UTC)