Talk – Sandbox – Suggestions |
![]() |
This is an archive of past discussion. Please do not modify it.
|
|
I think it is a daisgrace that christians are so derogatory about Islam, especially the way they blame the whole of Islam for terrorism. I want to know, do you agree and support my views? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.2.48.70 ( talk) 11:59, 17 April 2007 (UTC).
I was about to respond to your comment on WP:AIV regarding the IP that only had two edits today, but the slate was wiped clean. My understanding was that as long as a last warning was recent (less than two hours), then it should be reported. Please let me know if I'm wrong. -- Joelmills 21:31, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, Luna. -- Joelmills 21:38, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thanks for blocking User:69.114.148.28. This user kept bugging me by vandalizing my user page by changing "Wikipedians in the United States" to "Wikipedians in the closet". If the block of 69.114.148.28 expires, would you mind keeping an eye on my user page? Amos Han Talk 01:26, 18 April 2007 (UTC) |
Hi, thanks for pointing that out to me, i would of never known. cheers Thenthornthing 06:28, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello! thank you very much for the nice welcome! I will try my best to help improve this wikipedia. The high and mighty 08:18, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Please let the user know that they are blocked by putting a block template on there talk page. I already did with the user User talk:24.4.15.40 which you just recently blocked. It is very confusing to know that they are blocked without warning them. Please do so when you block users. Thank you. King Lopez Contribs 08:33, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Comments and/or possible action from an uninvolved admin are needed here. The admins in this thread agree in their view of the situation, but are recusing themselves from taking action because of prior involvement with the individuals in question. Care to step in? Raymond Arritt 10:48, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi Luna Santin, I'm having trouble with changing my username. Can you help me? I want to change the present name, "Carmenj" to "Nooch-nombe". Can you do this or do I have to do it? Thanks for the help. Carmenj 20:58, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
OMG (flood). – Luna Santin ( talk) 03:52, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Enough is Enough! I need help with this user named Klyptzm, He dleates warning tamplets I put up to warn him about personal attacks, And also to get him to stop calling me sockpuppet for no apparent resion what so ever! He also thinks hes smart by vandlizing my page with his Sockpuppet tamplets! Im just a regular user and he just keeps harassing me can you help? I need a Admins help so please help me! This has gone on with this for to long!-- Tommy Montana 16:58, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Come on please help me you seen what he did I do not know this people please contact me and help me!-- Tommy Montana 05:03, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Klyptzm is annoying meng! Change the record Klyptzm your always after Butterrum and Craxy!! Don't be carful and you'll think hes everywhere...Hey Luna how come you don't talk to me after all it is to help repay after taking 15 YEARS from me! You can find me on Myspace don't talk to me i'll start talking to you then you answer! We need to talk si? I'll keep in touch. (your friend the that you toke 15 years from)
Please see the history for Dimitar Berbatov. I've reverted it a couple times, but there will probably be more. -- Charitwo 23:20, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Could you please block User:24.1.156.93? User:24.1.156.93 vandalized my user page three times and my talk page once, despite very strong messages (see contributions for more details). Amos Han Talk 00:40, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thanks for blocking User:24.1.156.93. Now I can rest for 31 hours. Amos Han Talk 00:46, 20 April 2007 (UTC) |
Heard you're the man to go to for range blocks - would you do a short one on the 84s? They're trolling Jimbo's userspace and having fun on random pages. Cheers, – Riana ऋ 02:03, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my page. Thanks! =) -- † Ðy§ep§ion † Speak your mind 02:42, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
And thanks from me as well. - Banyan Tree 10:52, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
Recently, I have been scanning the AfD backlogs to examine which discussions can be closed. You nominated Deep Stealth Productions for deletion; however, I would like to close it as "no consensus" based on the feedback.
Any objections? -- Aarktica 16:50, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Posted this to User talk:Dfrg.msc/Admin coaching - copy for your information:
“ | Nice work! As you know I'm currently on a MUCH needed wikibreak, however, should you need some guidance in the interim may I strongly suggest Daniel, Sarah, Riana and Luna - all very friendly and VERY helpful admins :) Enjoy! Glen 17:36, 20 April 2007 (UTC) | ” |
Thanks matey! Glen 17:44, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
I wasnt kiding when I said this user is bugging me and vandlizing my pages Señor! I really do need your help and now you won't help me?!-- Tommy Montana ~The World Chico and everything in it~ 20:58, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
I've forwarded the mail to permissions id more than 10 days back and disappointed that there is no response from them. Is there any other way to cut the red-tape?
Balajiviswanathan 22:10, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello, Thanks for your response. Every time I go to copy/paste that line, it won't let me paste to the bottom of username change page, unless I'm doing something wrong. You offered to do this so could you? I'd appreciate it very much. Just let me know what I should do after that. Thanks so much. Carmenj 19:03, 21 April 2007 (UTC) Hi again, I tried again and I think I got it. Would you check it fot me? You've been very helpful. Thanks again. Carmenj 19:23, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
I'm always willing to allow one more chance to someone who apologizes and promises not to vandalize again (obviously, on a one-strike-and-out basis). Thanks for asking! NawlinWiki 01:08, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Aaah...good times! *gives high five* ~ Giggy! Talk Contribs 05:13, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
hey. where are you from?
I was recently made an admin and am trying to get my arms around how long I should block vandals. I understand the default is 24 hours, but noticed that for User talk:89.172.86.37, you set the block to 31 hours. If you have time, could you explain the reason for what you did? Please understand, I'm not questioning what you did, but rather trying to learn. I have added your talk page to my watchlist, so you can reply here. Thanks! wrp103 (Bill Pringle) (Talk) 23:18, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Gosh, that is a late thanks - you're very, very welcome! Reminds me of a few I still have to hand out, too... :) – Riana ऋ 00:57, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
While browsing around on the "Recent Changes" page, I noticed how helpful you've been in reverting vandalism. CA387 09:24, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For your tireless quest to liberate the minds of Wikipedians from the opressive shackles of vandalism CA387 09:24, 23 April 2007 (UTC) |
Do you think you could do me a bit of a favor and block this guy? He keeps on vandalising Trout Quintet [1]. I'm a bit of a newbie, so I'm not quite sure if there's a formal procedure for this—I've already left a few warnings. Thanks! :) -- CA387 10:24, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Luna... I trusted you! And you toke 15 Years from me but..I wanna talk to you like human you know meng? Myspace Meng talk you happy promise! (15 YEARS Luna) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 208.125.114.250 ( talk) 14:56, 23 April 2007 (UTC).
I was interested in learning about Money Merge Accounts, but it seems the article has been deleted. How can I see the old information, and perhaps re-list it.
Any help or a push in the right direction would help.
Sorry if either: I used the incorrect method to contact you ~or~ You are not associated with this article —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Edgarjones ( talk • contribs) 23 April 2007.
Block me. I can live with it.
The mess that's being made of Parker v District of Columbia is why Wikipedia can't rise above the level of a sophisticated Blog.
The "Controversy" section doesn't belong there in the first place, and the fact that you and other non-experts are issuing "warnings" indicates Wikipedia has become a sandbox for idiots.
Sorry I can't be more polite, but that's the long and short of it.
Eblem 22:15, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
You deleted Justin Samuel for not asserting notability. It mentions that he was a federal criminal and that he is hated by much of a popular movement--animal rights--for his role in turning witness & cooperating with the government to convict his co-defendant in order to receive a lighter sentence. For someone to be on the FBI wanted list, serve in federal prison and be hated by many people, I think that assesses a degree of notability. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ryansmithxvx ( talk • contribs) 03:56, 24 April 2007 (UTC).
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 17 | 23 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:49, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
I like it; it's witty. :P (I saw it on UT:KOS) I wish I could have supported. — $PЯING rαgђ 14:42, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
I'll unblock and keep an eye on the account- may as well offer a second chance. Though the fact that the account was previously caught in an autoblock makes me suspicious. Still, AGF right? WjB scribe 18:04, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Shouldn't a message be left on User talk:67.79.148.42 as a record of the block? Tamino 18:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for blocking this vandal. :) Acalamari 22:57, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi there. Can you please have a look at User:68.35.123.63; their autoblock is affecting User:EnglishEfternamn who, as far as I know, is a good-faith editor. I was going to clear the autoblock but I saw your reason to block was "sock farm for EineNeueSchuhe", and that you had declined to unblock the IP already, so I thought I would speak to you before doing anything. You could either speak to EnglishEfternamn yourself or tell me what to do. Best wishes -- Guinnog 23:44, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for blocking Dark Lord Encyclopedia Dramatica -- I was beginning to get tired of all that reverting. ;) Switchercat talk cont 01:40, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
"* Decline reason: Let us know when you plan on acting your age. This one should last about 24 hours. Luna Santin (talk) 17:59, 24 April 2007 (UTC)"
You appear to have posted this in the wrong location. I did not request a block removal. In fact, I had requested my user page and talk page be *removed*. Because there was an IP block, my guess is that it snagged someone or someones else.
In North America it is considered rude to suggest an action that you know someone cannot take. In this case, knowing that I was blocked, you knew that I could not "let us know" anything, whoever "us" is (is there someone in there with you?). Except insofar as you have office or authority in Wikipedia, no one cares about your personal assessments. In fulfilling your office or in exercising your authority, sharing your personal assessments is inappropriate.
In the United States in particular derogatory references to age, national origin, race, and religion violate both Federal and various state laws, are subject to civil action, and in some cases criminal action, and were I you I would refrain from making them. You do not know me, my age or sex, and gross impertinence suggesting that I act some age or other is unwarranted. It was, in fact, a personal attack:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:NPA
If you wish to present as an impartial moderating influence in Wikipedia, leading by example in exercising office or authority, instead of presenting as an ill-bred boorish self-absorbed git, take these few observations in the spirit they were intended, control your editorializing, and familiarize yourself with internationally appropriate demeanor and etiquette. It will pay off in the long run, and I encourage you to learn from this and change your ways.
Bon appetit. Don't respond. Adieu.
Eblem 09:41, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the message and you're welcome for my support. I'm a little inactive from the wiki, but I still check it out regularly. I do believe that ascii art from Netstripe is a cow, it has udders
D e mos D e mon 16:39, 25 April 2007 (UTC) (I should really remove those green e's from my signature)
Reguarding the Money merge account, I wouldn't mind starting it up again, but the title is protected.
Thanks for your time
Eddie Jones 20:07, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
I was that close in asking bishzilla to vandalizing your userpage...that close. :-) Real96 21:15, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for fixing the problem. Miaers 03:48, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for your help on Column Width in Tables. I am relatively new to Wikipedia. To be honest, I barely understood a word of your response to me. Can you please re-read my question and respond in simpler terms. Think, "Dummy's Guide to Creating a Wiki Table." Thanks! ( JosephASpadaro 04:40, 26 April 2007 (UTC))
For example, if I have a column called "Name" -- and the longest name is JOHN, the column is very narrow, like the word JOHN. If I go in and add a name like GEORGE AND MARTHA WASHINGTON, then the column automatically gets wider (to accomodate the longer name). This happens regardless of the fact that I have entered a column width. Any ideas on why? I assumed that setting the column width made the column's width stable and fixed, and not fluid / changing.
Also -- I have been using the following format to set a column width: (which some one told me to use)
!width="150"|Name
Do you know what that number 150 means? Is "pixels" implied or used by default? Or does my above code mean something different than pixels? And why is the "150" in quote marks?
Maybe this is the source of my problem? Or maybe this code simply means the same exact thing as 150 pixels? Any ideas? THANKS! ( JosephASpadaro 05:11, 26 April 2007 (UTC))
Perhaps IP block from new account creation? This is the latest incarnation: User:3049. - Cquan ( talk, AMA Desk) 06:36, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Remember me? 66.218.13.32? The guy you had to deal with a little while ago? The guy that hates abortions. Listen, I'm sorry I made all those edits. You shouldn't have blocked me for editing on the Sandbox, but anyway. I left you a bad message in your Improve Me talk page. I reverted it and apologized. Once again, I'm sorry for doing this to you. -- 69.67.229.50 17:31, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
It looks like they were consistently removing the following link:
from various article spaces. However, if you look at how the user was removing this link, they were also removing the categories and other links pertinent to the subjects. They were also not specifying why they saw the need to remove that particular link, although it does appear in all of the articles that they edited. I'm not sure if it qualifies as link spam as it could be argued that it is relevant to most of the articles it is found on. -- BrokenSphere 18:39, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello, I've started using TWINKLE, and when I try to rollback a vandal's edit using the rollback button, it won't work. Thoughts as to the problem? Brain40 23:00, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
You know? Your alright! Thank you for cleaning up the vandalism on my user page and blocking that annoying vandal. I think you have enough barnstars already but have a cookie. King
Lopez Contribs 02:18, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
is there a reason you un-did the revisions I made to the macy's page? I'm a 19 year Marshall Field/Macy's sales manager, so i can verify the data. What gives? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chicagoblt ( talk • contribs) 27 April 2007.
Good evening ( GMT time); hope you don't mind - I've added {{ Uw-block1}} to User talk:Master123000, in lieu of your forgetting to (?) ... unless there was a reason you didn't. Feel free to remove!
Kindest regards,
AGK 22:15, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
I thought that usernames including sexualy inappropriete content are blocked without exceptions.-- U.S.A. cubed 23:01, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
That sounds logical to me.-- U.S.A. cubed 23:05, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello I am a new user on the wiki, and I need some help, for some reason on this website there are certain pages that I can't edit. Why? Eaomatrix 09:58, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for taking the time to acknowledge by modest anti-vandalism effort. It was appreciated.
RobertII 14:47, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Luna,
I am JuWiki. My old account stopped working, so I moved my old userpage to my new one. Don't blame me or block me, for I really am JuWiki (see here). JuWiki2 19:39, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Do you know what are you doing as admin?`. Your reverts support only cat's vandalism. Please see the map
and this [ |POV]. Thanks -- Bohater 22:39, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
I noticed you reformatted my Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/COFS, and just wanted to say thank you for the time and effort. I realize it wasn't too hard, but then again you probably don't get thanked much for helping out at WP:RCU. Anynobody 04:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
You're most welcome :) Anynobody 04:11, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For patrolling the recent changes very fast and very efficiently, I award this barnstar. Keep up the good work! Lradrama 10:24, 30 April 2007 (UTC) |
why cant i edit pages i already edited, and why has the things i hav edited gone away? Stamfordterry 15:02, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
i cant edit stuff....
Stamfordterry 15:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
By any normal logic, it's obvious that "Bwah123" richly deserved the indefinite block that you gave him. The trouble is, normal logic hardly applies to a site such as this where IDs are created effortlessly and instantly. Thus "Bwah123" took mere seconds before popping back, complete with obsessions about penises, as "Owangejuice".
If I ran this show, I'd both (i) make getting an ID a lot harder, and (ii) ban nitwits permanently and without any timewasting warnings. But I don't, and since I can't do anything about the nutty free handout of IDs, I tend to string the nitwits along. At least I then know their IDs, and their activities are easier to track.
All of this is daft, isn't it?
(I also occasionally wonder about this recurrent obsession of vandals with writing about anal sex. If they're so enthralled by the idea, why don't they just run off and do it, or (more likely) gaze at photos of others doing it? Still, I don't want to fathom the depths of the retard mind; it's too depressing a prospect.)
No need to reply; but if you want to, feel free to do so here. -- Hoary 02:03, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Why did you delete my page? It is fictional material that I worked hard on. I resent the fact that you deleted it. It was really well written, if I do say so myself. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mitsu666 ( talk • contribs) 1 May 2007.
To request unblocking: IP address: 203.52.130.138 Blocking admin: Nishkid64 Block reason: Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by " Flat chicken". The reason given for Flat chicken's block is: "Page-moving vandalism". Your account name (if you have one): Dwuu How do I get unblock. I have nothing to do with Flat Chicken. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dwuu ( talk • contribs)
Thanks for you help with getting me started with Wikipedia!!! I was able to publish a new article about Money merge account but it would seem an update has left it with a bit of a bias. I listed my concerns on the talk page. If you have a second, could you take a look? I'm thinking of just droping it. Eddie Jones 04:57, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 18 | 30 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:32, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Nah, my bad, I am the one that archived it first, when I added the 5th case. I am not sure of what is happening here to be honest. -- lucasbfr talk 18:17, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
hi you blocked my IP adress but I didn't do anything wrong. So...I don't understand why. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Emma dux ( talk • contribs) 2 May 2007.
I see that you just shut down the second thread by User:Annoynmous about how everyone's undoing his undoings. While he started it about others, his conduct is going beyond POINT into DICK, and I was about to post his continuing contribs as indicative of his desire to NOT listen, NOT abide by decisions, and NOT participate in the debate about this, and then ask about a block, so that the editors who keep undoing his edits can return to and focus on the debate. Anyways, I was hoping that since you're trying to de-escalate him, you could watch his contribs to make sure he doesn't jsut keep this up all night? thank you. ThuranX 06:04, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks very much for the warm welcome and see you around! :) Sweetpopcorn1 07:40, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you have been blocking a lot of vandals (which is good) without placing any information on the user talk page denoting that they've been blocked (which is not so good). It helps vandal patrollers as much as it informs the vandal. Please start placing the block templates on the user talk pages if you would be so kind. -- KirinX 15:27, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
An experienced user can obtain block details, including the blocking administrator and reason, by looking at the block log.
The blocked user will be notified of their block, including the blocking administrator and reason, when they try to edit a page.
That's all that is necessary. Anything else is a simply waste of time. Why do people not understand this? – Gurch 06:41, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
I hope youre playin around in the sandbox. Your edits say you are promoting vandalism. -- Meaneager 02:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Discussion has got very bad, very fast, as a member of the Mediation Cabal has proposed thatrape should not be discussed in a particular context exactly because it is too common to be noteworthy. — SlamDiego 04:36, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Thank you :) MojoTas 07:12, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page. Dismas| (talk) 14:02, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks very much for your greeting Luna - will be sure to come and knock on your door for advise in future. cheers, malchick —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Malchick79 ( talk • contribs) 3 May 2007.
Ok - this revert summary made me chuckle! :) - Alison ☺ 03:03, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Because if you looked Jofish was changing my user page that the reason but since then i have changed it back. Chad Sharman 04:07, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi Luna Santin,
Thank you very much to responding my plea for help. I appreciate it. The article looks clean, but the headings are still a bit wrong. Let me explain. The actual headings are as follows. (For some reason the Contents list is not proper in its indenting)
1 Brief history
2 Admission
2.1 Pilani & Goa Campuses
2.2 Dubai Campus
3 Reputation & Rankings
4 Pilani Campus
4.1 Highlights
4.2 Academics
4.2.1 Integrated First Degree
4.2.2 Higher Degree
4.2.3 Flexibilities, Dual Degree & Transfer Option
4.3 Initiatives
4.3.1 BitsConnect
4.3.2 International Projects
4.3.3 Practice Schools
4.3.4 University-Industry Linkage
4.3.5 Off Campus Programs
4.4 Annual Festivals
4.4.1 APOGEE
4.4.2 INTERFACE
4.4.3 CONQUEST
4.4.4 OASIS
4.4.5 SANGAMAM
4.4.6 BOSM
4.5 Research & Development Centres
5 Goa Campus
5.1 Highlights
5.2 Academics
5.3 Initiatives
5.4 Annual Festivals
5.4.1 Quark
5.4.2 Waves
5.4.3 Zephyr
5.5 Research & Development Centres
6 Dubai Campus
6.1 Highlights
6.2 Academics
6.3 Initiatives
7 BITSAA (BITS Alumni Association)
7.1 Chapters
7.2 Alumni of Note
8 Notes
9 External Links —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
Vinwe (
talk •
contribs) 07:17, 4 May 2007 (UTC).
Vinwe 07:18, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
To add on to the earlier comments, I just corrected the headings. They are all fine. the problem is with the contents list, where after heading 5, the spacings are not formatted, as in 5, 5.1 5.2 all start at the same place.
Vinwe 07:27, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
WP:REVERT - looks too complex for me - I'll just contact you or somother helpful person! Osborne
Why is the Twinrova article will never be put up for AfD? -- 210.50.14.172 13:33, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for restoring my page while I was away, jimfbleak 16:31, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
It appears that this user wants to create a new account, because he apparently did not vandalize, his brother did. I wish I could believe him, but I don't know why the user itself, posted the message. Presuming that the post is correct, would it be a good idea to lift the account creation block so that the leginamate person can create a new account?-- U.S.A. cubed 20:54, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Well done blocking User:85.119.157.52. Someone using this IP kept vandalizing despite warnings. NHRHS Class of 2010 22:16, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I couldn't help but notice that the Negima?! page is being constantly hit by vandals who apparently want the whole page gone. I saw some hints of an 'edit war' going on at the talk page ... What is the problem and what is being done to put a stop to them? Art is life and life is an art. 22:31, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Why is an anon user (193.224.247.34) banned without evidence just because he complains about the Duck test? There is no evidence he is a banned user! It could be a registered user who fears a summery block (which of course he got). Please go to [4] to provide any evidence or reasons. Hypnosadist 11:46, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Sir, These anon users whose IP are 59.95.30.220, 59.95.17.75, 59.95.8.116, 203.94.192.142, 203.94.200.55 are removing cited information even after several requests have been made not to vandalize. Please put anon lock (sblock?) on these articles below and block their IP's. The user with IP 203.. seems to have created an account User:Deccanwala and is continuing his personal attacks on me.
Vijayanagara
Origin of Vijayanagara Empire
Talk:Vijayanagara Empire-->personal attack
Seuna Yadavas of Devagiri
Talk:Political history of medieval Karnataka-->personal attack
Rashtrakuta Dynasty(FA)
Political history of medieval Karnataka
History of Karnataka
Thank you
Dineshkannambadi 15:57, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Sir, the IP address 59.95... has the same edit pattern, language of indef banned User:Sarvabhaum Thanks Dineshkannambadi 22:32, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Other IP's of same vandal. 59.95.58.31, 59.95.24.191, 59.95.27.152, 59.95.46.93, 59.95.0.6 Dineshkannambadi 00:20, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
59.95.27.87, 59.95.27.152, 59.95.17.176, 59.95.3.25, 59.95.23.215 Dineshkannambadi 11:47, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
This is not vandalism. questioning authenticity of information is not vandalism. I request admin to show ka'badi the door and do something abt yadavas of devagiri ASAP.
Sir neither am i a vandal nor am i sock. The ip range is owned by whole city of mine including the college. i have citations and i want history of my community should not be played with by the likes of kannambadi.
Sir, This indef banished User:Sarvabhaum is crawling through Karnataka/ Kannada related articles throwing citation needed tags. I request a wide ban on IP addresses from this region. I have also asked others to report this activity to you.Thanks Dineshkannambadi 14:32, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
It's very unfortunate to see hard work of dedicated editors being vandalized by some unknown IPs. I've been correcting the edits of these IPs for 3-4 days now. Every time this user logs in, he vandalizes certain articles with frivolous tags, deletion of content and adding unreferenced, irrelevant sentences. Personal attacks in talk pages are done time and again. If this user is not User:Sarvabhaum as he claims, why don't he log in or create and account? I request concerned admins to take appropriate action against these vandal IPs. Gnanapiti 15:34, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Nice question. This gnanapiti, kammanbadi, sarvagnya, knm and other kannadi gang kannadize each and evry article they go. Many Tamil nadu/Maharashtra and AP related historiacal articles are vandalised by these people. They roam in group so as to fare well in edit warring. I believe Gnanapiti and sarvagnya are sockpuppets and confirmed as well. KNM and kannambadi need to be checked. They have created a sytemized bias against Marathi people in yadavas of devagiri and rashtrakutas. They shamelessly market their theories and belittle other's history. This needs to be checked.
I am not Sarvabhaum,for the last time. The IP address is shared by whole city of mine or atleast whole college of mine. Atleast 7 people are in wikipedia from my college. Those who want to check might do so. I am not a vandaliser. Someone has to rise up against the kannadi vandalism. I am for justice and unless i dont get it let these kannadis feel the heat.
Dineshkannambadi's reply
Sir, please discuss with admin User talk:Blnguyen and he will confirm who this person 59.95.. is. This guy was banned permanently for sock puppetry, edit warring and avoiding bans through IP's and has been giving the same excuse about college students using common IP's etc. Words like "feel the heat" is a clear example of a mind set on vengence and stalking. This is not the case of many students on a common computer but a case of one person perhaps switching computers in a college or in a cyber cafe with one intention - Vandalism. The fact that he is watching our edits to your talk page proves that he is not a kid having fun either. Dineshkannambadi 15:59, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Now u see sir. First came gnanapiti than sarvagnya and now kannambadi. See the time of their posts. These guys play a dirty game of edit warring and bully others. Blnguyen blocks any ip/a/c which starts from 59.95 which is shared by whole of my city. Also, see my views and questions and not my ip.Now i will tell u why i am here. sarvabhaum, vishu, Mahawiki, Pratap are all in my college and they have tried many times to get this kannadis some sense and manners. But this jerks go on vandalising historical article sof others states of India and push their state's POV by using an idioctic auther's book who has no credentials or who's not even know outside his state. This should end and so should this combined arson of this kannadi editors.
Vandalizing articles and image pages with frivolous tags have to be stopped. What Sarvabhaum is exactly trying to prove here? I don't know what is the solution. May be blocking the range of IP?
Gnanapiti 16:16, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
One who's confirmed sockpuppet of User:Sarvagnya should not indulge in mudslinging. Sir, addition of tags questioning authenticity and accuracy of information isnt vandalism. If it was than how come this kannadi gang attacked various Marathi (eg.shivaji,Yadavas of devagiri) and other Tamil articles/images with tags? Again,Sarvabhaum isnt me.I am distinct than that of him. Another thing is that this Gnanapiti aka Sarvagnya, Dineshkannambadi, KNM have a unholy nexus and they assisit eact other for edit wars. This harrassment should stop. They use some references which have no value and are nothing but self-congratulatery idiotic historians. I cant allow my state's history to be maligned by kannadi sources. Why block my IP?Because i am giving tit for tat? I request admin to act in a impartial way and help curbing out kannadisation of articles and terrorism of this kannadi editors.
I am the one who kept an eye on Negima!? with you. I am User:Han Amos and had a bureaucrat rename me to User:NHRHS2010 and I made my 3000th edit recently. NHRHS Class of 2010 20:44, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Chad Sharman 04:06, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
why dont you talk to the dicks that changed my page also i sent you a measage last week about that
ha people changed my page why dont u talk to them.also i sent you a measage like last week
Right whats that is it like so people cant edit my page Chad Sharman 04:23, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 19 | 7 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:23, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
You have salted Talk:HD DVD Encryption Key with a comment that you will deal with it later. Now that HD DVD Encryption Key is a redirect to AACS encryption key controversy, maybe Talk:HD DVD Encryption Key should just redirect to Talk:AACS encryption key controversy. -- Derlay 09:12, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi! I'm the owner of the photo you had deleted, since I don't visit often Wikipedia, it will be nice to send an email in order to act about.. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chokyi ( talk • contribs) 09:51, 8 May 2007 (UTC).
Thanks by the reply.
Have recorded/copied article from Time magazine and loaded it in "AlGAE" - is this permitted? I suppose I should rephrase it, shorten it & use it only as the reference/footnote, in which case how should I do that? Osborne 11:14, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Why did you change Mars? "Hi" Is awesome? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.144.69.246 ( talk • contribs)
I hope you don't mind, but I switched this block [5] from a soft block to a hard block, as the name is bad faith. Just letting you know. HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 22:10, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Nice reverting on Mars, keep up the good work. :) Rosa 23:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC) |
I was wondering if you would not mind to change the Semi-Protection on List of Disney Channel Original Movies to Full Protection until some disputes about what constitutes a verifable source can be resolved. Thank you for your help. Lord Hawk 02:11, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello. I'm in agreement with the recent revert you made to
User:Meegs. You may already know about them, but you might find
Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the
sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. --
Kralizec! (
talk) 05:37, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for fixing my userpage. And FYI 84.9.229.240 ( talk • contribs) is not my IP address. Thanks again! Sincerely, Sir intellegent - smartr tahn eaver!!!! 21:49, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
And (I just checked your user page) can you semi-protect my user page if possible? I am a very sensitive person... I was bullied in Elementary through 8th grade. Sincerely, Sir intellegent - smartr tahn eaver!!!! 21:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
You better keep an eye on WP:AIV because it is being clogged up right now. NHRHS2010 Talk 23:07, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
When you blocked 64.215.82.94 you said "That's what you get for being white, moron". Can you explain this? This user is a vandal and a serious one but isn't it still a violation of WP:CIVIL to insult them? --
St.daniel
Talk 23:54, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
The user vandalised the block review. I've since reverted it. HalfShadow 23:55, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, I'm the author of a poorly executed AfD, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yamaha Banshee 350. I request early closure, because my nomination was made with terrible precedent and hasty judgement. Thank you. ALTON .ıl 06:24, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
If you type Vidya Shilp Academy in the google bar, you get a nonsensical article that appears as the 3rd hit from wikipedia! I've written the article myself about the school, but someone keeps changing/deleting it. At this point, I WANT TO GET RID OF THE ARTICLE AND DELETE IT ENTIRELY since im tired of the vandalism. HOW DO I DO THIS??
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vidyashilp_Academy —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dpkmallya ( talk • contribs) 09:00, 11 May 2007 (UTC).
Talk – Sandbox – Suggestions |
![]() |
This is an archive of past discussion. Please do not modify it.
|
|
I think it is a daisgrace that christians are so derogatory about Islam, especially the way they blame the whole of Islam for terrorism. I want to know, do you agree and support my views? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.2.48.70 ( talk) 11:59, 17 April 2007 (UTC).
I was about to respond to your comment on WP:AIV regarding the IP that only had two edits today, but the slate was wiped clean. My understanding was that as long as a last warning was recent (less than two hours), then it should be reported. Please let me know if I'm wrong. -- Joelmills 21:31, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, Luna. -- Joelmills 21:38, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thanks for blocking User:69.114.148.28. This user kept bugging me by vandalizing my user page by changing "Wikipedians in the United States" to "Wikipedians in the closet". If the block of 69.114.148.28 expires, would you mind keeping an eye on my user page? Amos Han Talk 01:26, 18 April 2007 (UTC) |
Hi, thanks for pointing that out to me, i would of never known. cheers Thenthornthing 06:28, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello! thank you very much for the nice welcome! I will try my best to help improve this wikipedia. The high and mighty 08:18, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Please let the user know that they are blocked by putting a block template on there talk page. I already did with the user User talk:24.4.15.40 which you just recently blocked. It is very confusing to know that they are blocked without warning them. Please do so when you block users. Thank you. King Lopez Contribs 08:33, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Comments and/or possible action from an uninvolved admin are needed here. The admins in this thread agree in their view of the situation, but are recusing themselves from taking action because of prior involvement with the individuals in question. Care to step in? Raymond Arritt 10:48, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi Luna Santin, I'm having trouble with changing my username. Can you help me? I want to change the present name, "Carmenj" to "Nooch-nombe". Can you do this or do I have to do it? Thanks for the help. Carmenj 20:58, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
OMG (flood). – Luna Santin ( talk) 03:52, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Enough is Enough! I need help with this user named Klyptzm, He dleates warning tamplets I put up to warn him about personal attacks, And also to get him to stop calling me sockpuppet for no apparent resion what so ever! He also thinks hes smart by vandlizing my page with his Sockpuppet tamplets! Im just a regular user and he just keeps harassing me can you help? I need a Admins help so please help me! This has gone on with this for to long!-- Tommy Montana 16:58, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Come on please help me you seen what he did I do not know this people please contact me and help me!-- Tommy Montana 05:03, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Klyptzm is annoying meng! Change the record Klyptzm your always after Butterrum and Craxy!! Don't be carful and you'll think hes everywhere...Hey Luna how come you don't talk to me after all it is to help repay after taking 15 YEARS from me! You can find me on Myspace don't talk to me i'll start talking to you then you answer! We need to talk si? I'll keep in touch. (your friend the that you toke 15 years from)
Please see the history for Dimitar Berbatov. I've reverted it a couple times, but there will probably be more. -- Charitwo 23:20, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Could you please block User:24.1.156.93? User:24.1.156.93 vandalized my user page three times and my talk page once, despite very strong messages (see contributions for more details). Amos Han Talk 00:40, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thanks for blocking User:24.1.156.93. Now I can rest for 31 hours. Amos Han Talk 00:46, 20 April 2007 (UTC) |
Heard you're the man to go to for range blocks - would you do a short one on the 84s? They're trolling Jimbo's userspace and having fun on random pages. Cheers, – Riana ऋ 02:03, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my page. Thanks! =) -- † Ðy§ep§ion † Speak your mind 02:42, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
And thanks from me as well. - Banyan Tree 10:52, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
Recently, I have been scanning the AfD backlogs to examine which discussions can be closed. You nominated Deep Stealth Productions for deletion; however, I would like to close it as "no consensus" based on the feedback.
Any objections? -- Aarktica 16:50, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Posted this to User talk:Dfrg.msc/Admin coaching - copy for your information:
“ | Nice work! As you know I'm currently on a MUCH needed wikibreak, however, should you need some guidance in the interim may I strongly suggest Daniel, Sarah, Riana and Luna - all very friendly and VERY helpful admins :) Enjoy! Glen 17:36, 20 April 2007 (UTC) | ” |
Thanks matey! Glen 17:44, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
I wasnt kiding when I said this user is bugging me and vandlizing my pages Señor! I really do need your help and now you won't help me?!-- Tommy Montana ~The World Chico and everything in it~ 20:58, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
I've forwarded the mail to permissions id more than 10 days back and disappointed that there is no response from them. Is there any other way to cut the red-tape?
Balajiviswanathan 22:10, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello, Thanks for your response. Every time I go to copy/paste that line, it won't let me paste to the bottom of username change page, unless I'm doing something wrong. You offered to do this so could you? I'd appreciate it very much. Just let me know what I should do after that. Thanks so much. Carmenj 19:03, 21 April 2007 (UTC) Hi again, I tried again and I think I got it. Would you check it fot me? You've been very helpful. Thanks again. Carmenj 19:23, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
I'm always willing to allow one more chance to someone who apologizes and promises not to vandalize again (obviously, on a one-strike-and-out basis). Thanks for asking! NawlinWiki 01:08, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Aaah...good times! *gives high five* ~ Giggy! Talk Contribs 05:13, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
hey. where are you from?
I was recently made an admin and am trying to get my arms around how long I should block vandals. I understand the default is 24 hours, but noticed that for User talk:89.172.86.37, you set the block to 31 hours. If you have time, could you explain the reason for what you did? Please understand, I'm not questioning what you did, but rather trying to learn. I have added your talk page to my watchlist, so you can reply here. Thanks! wrp103 (Bill Pringle) (Talk) 23:18, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Gosh, that is a late thanks - you're very, very welcome! Reminds me of a few I still have to hand out, too... :) – Riana ऋ 00:57, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
While browsing around on the "Recent Changes" page, I noticed how helpful you've been in reverting vandalism. CA387 09:24, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For your tireless quest to liberate the minds of Wikipedians from the opressive shackles of vandalism CA387 09:24, 23 April 2007 (UTC) |
Do you think you could do me a bit of a favor and block this guy? He keeps on vandalising Trout Quintet [1]. I'm a bit of a newbie, so I'm not quite sure if there's a formal procedure for this—I've already left a few warnings. Thanks! :) -- CA387 10:24, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Luna... I trusted you! And you toke 15 Years from me but..I wanna talk to you like human you know meng? Myspace Meng talk you happy promise! (15 YEARS Luna) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 208.125.114.250 ( talk) 14:56, 23 April 2007 (UTC).
I was interested in learning about Money Merge Accounts, but it seems the article has been deleted. How can I see the old information, and perhaps re-list it.
Any help or a push in the right direction would help.
Sorry if either: I used the incorrect method to contact you ~or~ You are not associated with this article —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Edgarjones ( talk • contribs) 23 April 2007.
Block me. I can live with it.
The mess that's being made of Parker v District of Columbia is why Wikipedia can't rise above the level of a sophisticated Blog.
The "Controversy" section doesn't belong there in the first place, and the fact that you and other non-experts are issuing "warnings" indicates Wikipedia has become a sandbox for idiots.
Sorry I can't be more polite, but that's the long and short of it.
Eblem 22:15, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
You deleted Justin Samuel for not asserting notability. It mentions that he was a federal criminal and that he is hated by much of a popular movement--animal rights--for his role in turning witness & cooperating with the government to convict his co-defendant in order to receive a lighter sentence. For someone to be on the FBI wanted list, serve in federal prison and be hated by many people, I think that assesses a degree of notability. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ryansmithxvx ( talk • contribs) 03:56, 24 April 2007 (UTC).
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 17 | 23 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:49, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
I like it; it's witty. :P (I saw it on UT:KOS) I wish I could have supported. — $PЯING rαgђ 14:42, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
I'll unblock and keep an eye on the account- may as well offer a second chance. Though the fact that the account was previously caught in an autoblock makes me suspicious. Still, AGF right? WjB scribe 18:04, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Shouldn't a message be left on User talk:67.79.148.42 as a record of the block? Tamino 18:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for blocking this vandal. :) Acalamari 22:57, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi there. Can you please have a look at User:68.35.123.63; their autoblock is affecting User:EnglishEfternamn who, as far as I know, is a good-faith editor. I was going to clear the autoblock but I saw your reason to block was "sock farm for EineNeueSchuhe", and that you had declined to unblock the IP already, so I thought I would speak to you before doing anything. You could either speak to EnglishEfternamn yourself or tell me what to do. Best wishes -- Guinnog 23:44, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for blocking Dark Lord Encyclopedia Dramatica -- I was beginning to get tired of all that reverting. ;) Switchercat talk cont 01:40, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
"* Decline reason: Let us know when you plan on acting your age. This one should last about 24 hours. Luna Santin (talk) 17:59, 24 April 2007 (UTC)"
You appear to have posted this in the wrong location. I did not request a block removal. In fact, I had requested my user page and talk page be *removed*. Because there was an IP block, my guess is that it snagged someone or someones else.
In North America it is considered rude to suggest an action that you know someone cannot take. In this case, knowing that I was blocked, you knew that I could not "let us know" anything, whoever "us" is (is there someone in there with you?). Except insofar as you have office or authority in Wikipedia, no one cares about your personal assessments. In fulfilling your office or in exercising your authority, sharing your personal assessments is inappropriate.
In the United States in particular derogatory references to age, national origin, race, and religion violate both Federal and various state laws, are subject to civil action, and in some cases criminal action, and were I you I would refrain from making them. You do not know me, my age or sex, and gross impertinence suggesting that I act some age or other is unwarranted. It was, in fact, a personal attack:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:NPA
If you wish to present as an impartial moderating influence in Wikipedia, leading by example in exercising office or authority, instead of presenting as an ill-bred boorish self-absorbed git, take these few observations in the spirit they were intended, control your editorializing, and familiarize yourself with internationally appropriate demeanor and etiquette. It will pay off in the long run, and I encourage you to learn from this and change your ways.
Bon appetit. Don't respond. Adieu.
Eblem 09:41, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the message and you're welcome for my support. I'm a little inactive from the wiki, but I still check it out regularly. I do believe that ascii art from Netstripe is a cow, it has udders
D e mos D e mon 16:39, 25 April 2007 (UTC) (I should really remove those green e's from my signature)
Reguarding the Money merge account, I wouldn't mind starting it up again, but the title is protected.
Thanks for your time
Eddie Jones 20:07, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
I was that close in asking bishzilla to vandalizing your userpage...that close. :-) Real96 21:15, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for fixing the problem. Miaers 03:48, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for your help on Column Width in Tables. I am relatively new to Wikipedia. To be honest, I barely understood a word of your response to me. Can you please re-read my question and respond in simpler terms. Think, "Dummy's Guide to Creating a Wiki Table." Thanks! ( JosephASpadaro 04:40, 26 April 2007 (UTC))
For example, if I have a column called "Name" -- and the longest name is JOHN, the column is very narrow, like the word JOHN. If I go in and add a name like GEORGE AND MARTHA WASHINGTON, then the column automatically gets wider (to accomodate the longer name). This happens regardless of the fact that I have entered a column width. Any ideas on why? I assumed that setting the column width made the column's width stable and fixed, and not fluid / changing.
Also -- I have been using the following format to set a column width: (which some one told me to use)
!width="150"|Name
Do you know what that number 150 means? Is "pixels" implied or used by default? Or does my above code mean something different than pixels? And why is the "150" in quote marks?
Maybe this is the source of my problem? Or maybe this code simply means the same exact thing as 150 pixels? Any ideas? THANKS! ( JosephASpadaro 05:11, 26 April 2007 (UTC))
Perhaps IP block from new account creation? This is the latest incarnation: User:3049. - Cquan ( talk, AMA Desk) 06:36, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Remember me? 66.218.13.32? The guy you had to deal with a little while ago? The guy that hates abortions. Listen, I'm sorry I made all those edits. You shouldn't have blocked me for editing on the Sandbox, but anyway. I left you a bad message in your Improve Me talk page. I reverted it and apologized. Once again, I'm sorry for doing this to you. -- 69.67.229.50 17:31, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
It looks like they were consistently removing the following link:
from various article spaces. However, if you look at how the user was removing this link, they were also removing the categories and other links pertinent to the subjects. They were also not specifying why they saw the need to remove that particular link, although it does appear in all of the articles that they edited. I'm not sure if it qualifies as link spam as it could be argued that it is relevant to most of the articles it is found on. -- BrokenSphere 18:39, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello, I've started using TWINKLE, and when I try to rollback a vandal's edit using the rollback button, it won't work. Thoughts as to the problem? Brain40 23:00, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
You know? Your alright! Thank you for cleaning up the vandalism on my user page and blocking that annoying vandal. I think you have enough barnstars already but have a cookie. King
Lopez Contribs 02:18, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
is there a reason you un-did the revisions I made to the macy's page? I'm a 19 year Marshall Field/Macy's sales manager, so i can verify the data. What gives? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chicagoblt ( talk • contribs) 27 April 2007.
Good evening ( GMT time); hope you don't mind - I've added {{ Uw-block1}} to User talk:Master123000, in lieu of your forgetting to (?) ... unless there was a reason you didn't. Feel free to remove!
Kindest regards,
AGK 22:15, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
I thought that usernames including sexualy inappropriete content are blocked without exceptions.-- U.S.A. cubed 23:01, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
That sounds logical to me.-- U.S.A. cubed 23:05, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello I am a new user on the wiki, and I need some help, for some reason on this website there are certain pages that I can't edit. Why? Eaomatrix 09:58, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for taking the time to acknowledge by modest anti-vandalism effort. It was appreciated.
RobertII 14:47, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Luna,
I am JuWiki. My old account stopped working, so I moved my old userpage to my new one. Don't blame me or block me, for I really am JuWiki (see here). JuWiki2 19:39, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Do you know what are you doing as admin?`. Your reverts support only cat's vandalism. Please see the map
and this [ |POV]. Thanks -- Bohater 22:39, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
I noticed you reformatted my Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/COFS, and just wanted to say thank you for the time and effort. I realize it wasn't too hard, but then again you probably don't get thanked much for helping out at WP:RCU. Anynobody 04:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
You're most welcome :) Anynobody 04:11, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For patrolling the recent changes very fast and very efficiently, I award this barnstar. Keep up the good work! Lradrama 10:24, 30 April 2007 (UTC) |
why cant i edit pages i already edited, and why has the things i hav edited gone away? Stamfordterry 15:02, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
i cant edit stuff....
Stamfordterry 15:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
By any normal logic, it's obvious that "Bwah123" richly deserved the indefinite block that you gave him. The trouble is, normal logic hardly applies to a site such as this where IDs are created effortlessly and instantly. Thus "Bwah123" took mere seconds before popping back, complete with obsessions about penises, as "Owangejuice".
If I ran this show, I'd both (i) make getting an ID a lot harder, and (ii) ban nitwits permanently and without any timewasting warnings. But I don't, and since I can't do anything about the nutty free handout of IDs, I tend to string the nitwits along. At least I then know their IDs, and their activities are easier to track.
All of this is daft, isn't it?
(I also occasionally wonder about this recurrent obsession of vandals with writing about anal sex. If they're so enthralled by the idea, why don't they just run off and do it, or (more likely) gaze at photos of others doing it? Still, I don't want to fathom the depths of the retard mind; it's too depressing a prospect.)
No need to reply; but if you want to, feel free to do so here. -- Hoary 02:03, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Why did you delete my page? It is fictional material that I worked hard on. I resent the fact that you deleted it. It was really well written, if I do say so myself. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mitsu666 ( talk • contribs) 1 May 2007.
To request unblocking: IP address: 203.52.130.138 Blocking admin: Nishkid64 Block reason: Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by " Flat chicken". The reason given for Flat chicken's block is: "Page-moving vandalism". Your account name (if you have one): Dwuu How do I get unblock. I have nothing to do with Flat Chicken. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dwuu ( talk • contribs)
Thanks for you help with getting me started with Wikipedia!!! I was able to publish a new article about Money merge account but it would seem an update has left it with a bit of a bias. I listed my concerns on the talk page. If you have a second, could you take a look? I'm thinking of just droping it. Eddie Jones 04:57, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 18 | 30 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:32, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Nah, my bad, I am the one that archived it first, when I added the 5th case. I am not sure of what is happening here to be honest. -- lucasbfr talk 18:17, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
hi you blocked my IP adress but I didn't do anything wrong. So...I don't understand why. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Emma dux ( talk • contribs) 2 May 2007.
I see that you just shut down the second thread by User:Annoynmous about how everyone's undoing his undoings. While he started it about others, his conduct is going beyond POINT into DICK, and I was about to post his continuing contribs as indicative of his desire to NOT listen, NOT abide by decisions, and NOT participate in the debate about this, and then ask about a block, so that the editors who keep undoing his edits can return to and focus on the debate. Anyways, I was hoping that since you're trying to de-escalate him, you could watch his contribs to make sure he doesn't jsut keep this up all night? thank you. ThuranX 06:04, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks very much for the warm welcome and see you around! :) Sweetpopcorn1 07:40, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you have been blocking a lot of vandals (which is good) without placing any information on the user talk page denoting that they've been blocked (which is not so good). It helps vandal patrollers as much as it informs the vandal. Please start placing the block templates on the user talk pages if you would be so kind. -- KirinX 15:27, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
An experienced user can obtain block details, including the blocking administrator and reason, by looking at the block log.
The blocked user will be notified of their block, including the blocking administrator and reason, when they try to edit a page.
That's all that is necessary. Anything else is a simply waste of time. Why do people not understand this? – Gurch 06:41, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
I hope youre playin around in the sandbox. Your edits say you are promoting vandalism. -- Meaneager 02:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Discussion has got very bad, very fast, as a member of the Mediation Cabal has proposed thatrape should not be discussed in a particular context exactly because it is too common to be noteworthy. — SlamDiego 04:36, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Thank you :) MojoTas 07:12, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page. Dismas| (talk) 14:02, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks very much for your greeting Luna - will be sure to come and knock on your door for advise in future. cheers, malchick —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Malchick79 ( talk • contribs) 3 May 2007.
Ok - this revert summary made me chuckle! :) - Alison ☺ 03:03, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Because if you looked Jofish was changing my user page that the reason but since then i have changed it back. Chad Sharman 04:07, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi Luna Santin,
Thank you very much to responding my plea for help. I appreciate it. The article looks clean, but the headings are still a bit wrong. Let me explain. The actual headings are as follows. (For some reason the Contents list is not proper in its indenting)
1 Brief history
2 Admission
2.1 Pilani & Goa Campuses
2.2 Dubai Campus
3 Reputation & Rankings
4 Pilani Campus
4.1 Highlights
4.2 Academics
4.2.1 Integrated First Degree
4.2.2 Higher Degree
4.2.3 Flexibilities, Dual Degree & Transfer Option
4.3 Initiatives
4.3.1 BitsConnect
4.3.2 International Projects
4.3.3 Practice Schools
4.3.4 University-Industry Linkage
4.3.5 Off Campus Programs
4.4 Annual Festivals
4.4.1 APOGEE
4.4.2 INTERFACE
4.4.3 CONQUEST
4.4.4 OASIS
4.4.5 SANGAMAM
4.4.6 BOSM
4.5 Research & Development Centres
5 Goa Campus
5.1 Highlights
5.2 Academics
5.3 Initiatives
5.4 Annual Festivals
5.4.1 Quark
5.4.2 Waves
5.4.3 Zephyr
5.5 Research & Development Centres
6 Dubai Campus
6.1 Highlights
6.2 Academics
6.3 Initiatives
7 BITSAA (BITS Alumni Association)
7.1 Chapters
7.2 Alumni of Note
8 Notes
9 External Links —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
Vinwe (
talk •
contribs) 07:17, 4 May 2007 (UTC).
Vinwe 07:18, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
To add on to the earlier comments, I just corrected the headings. They are all fine. the problem is with the contents list, where after heading 5, the spacings are not formatted, as in 5, 5.1 5.2 all start at the same place.
Vinwe 07:27, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
WP:REVERT - looks too complex for me - I'll just contact you or somother helpful person! Osborne
Why is the Twinrova article will never be put up for AfD? -- 210.50.14.172 13:33, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for restoring my page while I was away, jimfbleak 16:31, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
It appears that this user wants to create a new account, because he apparently did not vandalize, his brother did. I wish I could believe him, but I don't know why the user itself, posted the message. Presuming that the post is correct, would it be a good idea to lift the account creation block so that the leginamate person can create a new account?-- U.S.A. cubed 20:54, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Well done blocking User:85.119.157.52. Someone using this IP kept vandalizing despite warnings. NHRHS Class of 2010 22:16, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I couldn't help but notice that the Negima?! page is being constantly hit by vandals who apparently want the whole page gone. I saw some hints of an 'edit war' going on at the talk page ... What is the problem and what is being done to put a stop to them? Art is life and life is an art. 22:31, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Why is an anon user (193.224.247.34) banned without evidence just because he complains about the Duck test? There is no evidence he is a banned user! It could be a registered user who fears a summery block (which of course he got). Please go to [4] to provide any evidence or reasons. Hypnosadist 11:46, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Sir, These anon users whose IP are 59.95.30.220, 59.95.17.75, 59.95.8.116, 203.94.192.142, 203.94.200.55 are removing cited information even after several requests have been made not to vandalize. Please put anon lock (sblock?) on these articles below and block their IP's. The user with IP 203.. seems to have created an account User:Deccanwala and is continuing his personal attacks on me.
Vijayanagara
Origin of Vijayanagara Empire
Talk:Vijayanagara Empire-->personal attack
Seuna Yadavas of Devagiri
Talk:Political history of medieval Karnataka-->personal attack
Rashtrakuta Dynasty(FA)
Political history of medieval Karnataka
History of Karnataka
Thank you
Dineshkannambadi 15:57, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Sir, the IP address 59.95... has the same edit pattern, language of indef banned User:Sarvabhaum Thanks Dineshkannambadi 22:32, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Other IP's of same vandal. 59.95.58.31, 59.95.24.191, 59.95.27.152, 59.95.46.93, 59.95.0.6 Dineshkannambadi 00:20, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
59.95.27.87, 59.95.27.152, 59.95.17.176, 59.95.3.25, 59.95.23.215 Dineshkannambadi 11:47, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
This is not vandalism. questioning authenticity of information is not vandalism. I request admin to show ka'badi the door and do something abt yadavas of devagiri ASAP.
Sir neither am i a vandal nor am i sock. The ip range is owned by whole city of mine including the college. i have citations and i want history of my community should not be played with by the likes of kannambadi.
Sir, This indef banished User:Sarvabhaum is crawling through Karnataka/ Kannada related articles throwing citation needed tags. I request a wide ban on IP addresses from this region. I have also asked others to report this activity to you.Thanks Dineshkannambadi 14:32, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
It's very unfortunate to see hard work of dedicated editors being vandalized by some unknown IPs. I've been correcting the edits of these IPs for 3-4 days now. Every time this user logs in, he vandalizes certain articles with frivolous tags, deletion of content and adding unreferenced, irrelevant sentences. Personal attacks in talk pages are done time and again. If this user is not User:Sarvabhaum as he claims, why don't he log in or create and account? I request concerned admins to take appropriate action against these vandal IPs. Gnanapiti 15:34, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Nice question. This gnanapiti, kammanbadi, sarvagnya, knm and other kannadi gang kannadize each and evry article they go. Many Tamil nadu/Maharashtra and AP related historiacal articles are vandalised by these people. They roam in group so as to fare well in edit warring. I believe Gnanapiti and sarvagnya are sockpuppets and confirmed as well. KNM and kannambadi need to be checked. They have created a sytemized bias against Marathi people in yadavas of devagiri and rashtrakutas. They shamelessly market their theories and belittle other's history. This needs to be checked.
I am not Sarvabhaum,for the last time. The IP address is shared by whole city of mine or atleast whole college of mine. Atleast 7 people are in wikipedia from my college. Those who want to check might do so. I am not a vandaliser. Someone has to rise up against the kannadi vandalism. I am for justice and unless i dont get it let these kannadis feel the heat.
Dineshkannambadi's reply
Sir, please discuss with admin User talk:Blnguyen and he will confirm who this person 59.95.. is. This guy was banned permanently for sock puppetry, edit warring and avoiding bans through IP's and has been giving the same excuse about college students using common IP's etc. Words like "feel the heat" is a clear example of a mind set on vengence and stalking. This is not the case of many students on a common computer but a case of one person perhaps switching computers in a college or in a cyber cafe with one intention - Vandalism. The fact that he is watching our edits to your talk page proves that he is not a kid having fun either. Dineshkannambadi 15:59, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Now u see sir. First came gnanapiti than sarvagnya and now kannambadi. See the time of their posts. These guys play a dirty game of edit warring and bully others. Blnguyen blocks any ip/a/c which starts from 59.95 which is shared by whole of my city. Also, see my views and questions and not my ip.Now i will tell u why i am here. sarvabhaum, vishu, Mahawiki, Pratap are all in my college and they have tried many times to get this kannadis some sense and manners. But this jerks go on vandalising historical article sof others states of India and push their state's POV by using an idioctic auther's book who has no credentials or who's not even know outside his state. This should end and so should this combined arson of this kannadi editors.
Vandalizing articles and image pages with frivolous tags have to be stopped. What Sarvabhaum is exactly trying to prove here? I don't know what is the solution. May be blocking the range of IP?
Gnanapiti 16:16, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
One who's confirmed sockpuppet of User:Sarvagnya should not indulge in mudslinging. Sir, addition of tags questioning authenticity and accuracy of information isnt vandalism. If it was than how come this kannadi gang attacked various Marathi (eg.shivaji,Yadavas of devagiri) and other Tamil articles/images with tags? Again,Sarvabhaum isnt me.I am distinct than that of him. Another thing is that this Gnanapiti aka Sarvagnya, Dineshkannambadi, KNM have a unholy nexus and they assisit eact other for edit wars. This harrassment should stop. They use some references which have no value and are nothing but self-congratulatery idiotic historians. I cant allow my state's history to be maligned by kannadi sources. Why block my IP?Because i am giving tit for tat? I request admin to act in a impartial way and help curbing out kannadisation of articles and terrorism of this kannadi editors.
I am the one who kept an eye on Negima!? with you. I am User:Han Amos and had a bureaucrat rename me to User:NHRHS2010 and I made my 3000th edit recently. NHRHS Class of 2010 20:44, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Chad Sharman 04:06, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
why dont you talk to the dicks that changed my page also i sent you a measage last week about that
ha people changed my page why dont u talk to them.also i sent you a measage like last week
Right whats that is it like so people cant edit my page Chad Sharman 04:23, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 19 | 7 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:23, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
You have salted Talk:HD DVD Encryption Key with a comment that you will deal with it later. Now that HD DVD Encryption Key is a redirect to AACS encryption key controversy, maybe Talk:HD DVD Encryption Key should just redirect to Talk:AACS encryption key controversy. -- Derlay 09:12, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi! I'm the owner of the photo you had deleted, since I don't visit often Wikipedia, it will be nice to send an email in order to act about.. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chokyi ( talk • contribs) 09:51, 8 May 2007 (UTC).
Thanks by the reply.
Have recorded/copied article from Time magazine and loaded it in "AlGAE" - is this permitted? I suppose I should rephrase it, shorten it & use it only as the reference/footnote, in which case how should I do that? Osborne 11:14, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Why did you change Mars? "Hi" Is awesome? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.144.69.246 ( talk • contribs)
I hope you don't mind, but I switched this block [5] from a soft block to a hard block, as the name is bad faith. Just letting you know. HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 22:10, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Nice reverting on Mars, keep up the good work. :) Rosa 23:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC) |
I was wondering if you would not mind to change the Semi-Protection on List of Disney Channel Original Movies to Full Protection until some disputes about what constitutes a verifable source can be resolved. Thank you for your help. Lord Hawk 02:11, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello. I'm in agreement with the recent revert you made to
User:Meegs. You may already know about them, but you might find
Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the
sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. --
Kralizec! (
talk) 05:37, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for fixing my userpage. And FYI 84.9.229.240 ( talk • contribs) is not my IP address. Thanks again! Sincerely, Sir intellegent - smartr tahn eaver!!!! 21:49, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
And (I just checked your user page) can you semi-protect my user page if possible? I am a very sensitive person... I was bullied in Elementary through 8th grade. Sincerely, Sir intellegent - smartr tahn eaver!!!! 21:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
You better keep an eye on WP:AIV because it is being clogged up right now. NHRHS2010 Talk 23:07, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
When you blocked 64.215.82.94 you said "That's what you get for being white, moron". Can you explain this? This user is a vandal and a serious one but isn't it still a violation of WP:CIVIL to insult them? --
St.daniel
Talk 23:54, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
The user vandalised the block review. I've since reverted it. HalfShadow 23:55, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, I'm the author of a poorly executed AfD, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yamaha Banshee 350. I request early closure, because my nomination was made with terrible precedent and hasty judgement. Thank you. ALTON .ıl 06:24, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
If you type Vidya Shilp Academy in the google bar, you get a nonsensical article that appears as the 3rd hit from wikipedia! I've written the article myself about the school, but someone keeps changing/deleting it. At this point, I WANT TO GET RID OF THE ARTICLE AND DELETE IT ENTIRELY since im tired of the vandalism. HOW DO I DO THIS??
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vidyashilp_Academy —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dpkmallya ( talk • contribs) 09:00, 11 May 2007 (UTC).